Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your First French Employee Agrees to Leave While You Live Abroad: Rupture Conventionnelle Interviews, Homologation and Severance

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore and you run a French company from abroad. Eighteen months ago you completed your first hire in France: a permanent contract, a CDI (contrat à durée indéterminée, the open-ended employment contract that is the normal form of hiring under French law), a DPAE (déclaration préalable à l’embauche, the pre-hiring declaration filed with URSSAF, the network of offices that collects French social security contributions) and a trial period that went well. Today the situation has changed. The role no longer fits, or the employee wants to move on, or the relationship has simply run its course. Nobody committed misconduct, nobody is at fault, and neither side wants a dismissal procedure or a resignation that leaves the employee without unemployment benefits. Your French adviser mentions two words: rupture conventionnelle. This is the mutually agreed termination of an employment contract created by the French Labour Code, a procedure in which employer and employee jointly decide the conditions of the separation, including a specific severance payment, and then ask the administration to approve their agreement. It is neither a dismissal nor a resignation, and it cannot be imposed by either side. For a foreign founder it looks like the clean solution, and it often is, but only when every step is completed in the right order. Sign the agreement before holding a genuine interview, file the approval request one day too early, offer one euro less than the legal floor, or set the end date before the administration answers, and the whole separation collapses: the labour court reclassifies the rupture as a dismissal without real and serious cause, with back pay, notice, severance and damages. This article explains how to part company with your first French employee by mutual agreement while you live abroad, from the interviews to the State approval called homologation, from the severance calculation to the documents that close the file.

I. Sign a rupture conventionnelle your employee cannot undo: interviews, retraction and homologation from abroad

The rupture conventionnelle follows a strict timetable set by statute. The Labour Code organises it in three stages: one or more interviews, a written agreement with a 15-day cooling-off period, and an administrative approval. Each stage protects the freedom of consent of both parties, and each stage has traps for an employer who manages the process from another country. The leading principle is stated in the first article of the section: article L. 1237-11 of the Labour Code provides that the employer and the employee may jointly agree the conditions of the termination of their contract, and it adds, word for word, that “La rupture conventionnelle, exclusive du licenciement ou de la démission, ne peut être imposée par l’une ou l’autre des parties”, which means that the mutually agreed termination, which excludes dismissal or resignation, cannot be imposed by either party. It continues: “Elle résulte d’une convention signée par les parties au contrat”, meaning it results from an agreement signed by the parties to the contract. Everything that follows exists to guarantee that this consent is free, and the labour courts verify it.

A. Hold one or more genuine interviews and sign a written agreement that states the severance and the end date

The procedure starts with dialogue, not paperwork. Article L. 1237-12 of the Labour Code requires the parties to agree the principle of a rupture conventionnelle during one or more interviews. These interviews are not a formality: the official approval form asks for their dates, and an agreement signed without any real discussion exposes you to a later claim that consent was not free. If you live abroad, organise the interviews seriously. Travel to France for at least one of them, or hold a properly scheduled video meeting that both sides treat as the formal interview, keep the invitation and confirm the date in writing, and never present the employee with a pre-signed agreement to rubber-stamp. The interview is also the moment when the employee exercises a right you must respect: during these meetings the employee may be assisted, either by a person of their choice from the staff of the company, or, where the company has no staff representative institution, which is the normal case for a foreign founder with one employee, by an outside employee adviser called a conseiller du salarié chosen from a list drawn up by the administration. The statute adds a mirror rule for you: when the employee uses this assistance, you may also be assisted, provided each side warns the other beforehand. In a one-employee company, inform the employee in writing before the interview that they may come assisted, note who attended, and keep that record with the file.

The written agreement, called the convention de rupture, is the heart of the file. In practice it is signed on the official form, cerfa number 14598, which can also be filed online through TéléRC (téléprocédure de la rupture conventionnelle, the online filing service of the Ministry of Labour). The agreement must define the conditions of the rupture, and article L. 1237-13 of the Labour Code names the two mandatory clauses. First, the amount of the specific rupture indemnity, the indemnité spécifique de rupture conventionnelle, which the same article frames with a floor: “le montant de l’indemnité spécifique de rupture conventionnelle qui ne peut pas être inférieur à celui de l’indemnité prévue à l’article L. 1234-9”, meaning the amount of the specific indemnity cannot be lower than the statutory dismissal indemnity. The detailed calculation of that floor is explained in Part II below, but the rule at the signature stage is simple: never offer less than the legal or conventional minimum, because the administration refuses approval below that line, as the case law confirms. Second, the agreement must fix the date of termination of the contract, with a constraint that structures the whole timetable: “Elle fixe la date de rupture du contrat de travail, qui ne peut intervenir avant le lendemain du jour de l’homologation”, meaning it sets the date of termination, which cannot fall before the day after the approval. In plain terms, the contract ends the day after the administration approves or is deemed to approve, at the earliest. Any earlier date written into the agreement is unlawful and must be moved. Attach useful annexes where relevant, such as the fate of a non-compete clause or the schedule for returning equipment, and have both parties sign and date each page. If your French company was set up as an SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or a SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company), the person who signs for the employer must have authority to bind the company, typically the president of the SAS or the gérant of the SARL, or a person holding a written delegation. A founder living abroad often mandates a French lawyer or accountant for the practical steps, but the interviews and the consent remain those of the employer, so the mandate should be written, dated and kept in the file.

Two categories of employees follow a different track, and you must identify them before signing. Employees with protected status, salariés protégés such as staff representatives or pregnant employees in certain cases, do not go through homologation at all: their rupture conventionnelle requires the authorisation of the labour inspector, and the contract can only end the day after that authorisation. With a single employee this is rare, but check the situation before starting. Conversely, collective departure schemes, work-force reduction plans and collective mutual-separation agreements are excluded from this section of the Code entirely, so the individual rupture conventionnelle described here is strictly a one-by-one procedure. If you chose your company vehicle recently, the companion guide on choosing between an SAS, a SARL and a branch in France explains who signs for the company, and the guide on hiring your first employee in France from abroad covers the contract and trial period that precede any separation.

B. Let the 15-day retraction period run, then obtain the administration approval before the contract ends

Signature does not end the matter; it starts two successive waiting periods, and confusing them is the most common cause of nullity. The first is the right of retraction, the délai de rétractation. Article L. 1237-13 of the Labour Code states it plainly: “A compter de la date de sa signature par les deux parties, chacune d’entre elles dispose d’un délai de quinze jours calendaires pour exercer son droit de rétractation”, meaning that from the date of signature by both parties, each of them has 15 calendar days to exercise the right to change their mind. Either side can withdraw, without giving reasons, by a letter sent through any means that proves the date of receipt by the other party, typically registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or hand delivery against a signed receipt. The official guidance on service-public.fr adds two practical points: the period starts the day after the signature date, and when the last day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, public holiday or equivalent day off, it is extended to the next working day. During these 15 days, do nothing irreversible: do not file the approval request, do not announce the departure as final, and do not stop paying the salary. If either party retracts, the procedure simply dies and the contract continues.

Only once the retraction period has fully expired may the approval stage begin. The request for homologation is sent by the more diligent party to the administrative authority with a copy of the agreement. Article L. 1237-14 of the Labour Code gives the administration “un délai d’instruction de quinze jours ouvrables”, a 15-working-day examination period running from receipt, to verify that the conditions of the section are met and that consent was free. The competent authority is the DREETS (direction régionale de l’économie, de l’emploi, du travail et des solidarités, the regional directorate for the economy, employment, labour and solidarities) of the place where the employer is established, acting through the local DDETSPP (direction départementale de l’emploi, du travail, des solidarités et de la protection des populations, the departmental directorate), as article R. 1237-3 of the Labour Code designates it. Filing is free and is done online via TéléRC or on paper with the cerfa form. Then comes the rule that protects employers against administrative silence: “A défaut de notification dans ce délai, l’homologation est réputée acquise”, meaning that without notification within that period, approval is deemed granted. Keep the proof of filing and the acknowledgement of receipt, because the deemed approval runs from the expiry of the 15 working days, and your termination date must sit after it. The statute closes with the sentence that gives this stage its full weight: “La validité de la convention est subordonnée à son homologation”, meaning the validity of the agreement depends on its approval. No approval, no rupture: the contract continues, and any separation carried out regardless is analysed as a dismissal without procedure.

The Cour de cassation (the highest French court for civil, commercial and labour matters) enforces this timetable strictly, and two decisions every foreign employer should know illustrate the two main dangers. First, never file early and never recycle an old cooling-off period. In a judgment of 13 June 2018, the Social Chamber held, on the combined application of articles L. 1237-13 and L. 1237-14, and I quote the operative words, “qu’une partie à une convention de rupture ne peut valablement demander l’homologation de cette convention à l’autorité administrative avant l’expiration du délai de rétractation de quinze jours”, meaning that a party cannot validly request approval before the 15-day retraction period has expired (Cass. soc., 13 June 2018, appeal no. 16-24.830). In that case the administration had refused a first agreement because the severance was below the conventional minimum; the parties signed a second agreement with a higher amount but kept the expired retraction deadline of the first. The Court ruled the employee should have benefited from a fresh retraction period, declared the second agreement void, and treated the end of the contract as a dismissal without real and serious cause, ordering severance, notice and damages. The lesson for a founder abroad is direct: after any refusal, restart the full sequence with a new retraction period, and never backdate interviews, signatures or deadlines on the new form. Second, keep consent genuine. In a judgment of 23 January 2019 the same chamber corrected a court of appeal that had annulled a rupture merely because the employee proved moral harassment, without any defect of consent: the Court held that, and these are its words, “l’existence de faits de harcèlement moral n’affecte pas en elle-même la validité de la convention de rupture”, meaning that the existence of moral harassment facts does not in itself affect the validity of the agreement, where no vice of consent is established (Cass. soc., 23 January 2019, appeal no. 17-21.550). Harassment remains unlawful and can be punished as such, but it annuls the rupture only when it actually vitiated consent through fraud, violence or similar pressure. Document calm, unpressured interviews, and the agreement stands; exert pressure to force a signature, and it falls.

II. Pay the right severance and close the file so no labour court case follows

An approved agreement is not yet a closed file. The second half of the operation is financial and administrative: compute a severance that clears the legal floor, apply the correct tax and social treatment through payroll, deliver the end-of-contract documents, and organise the company so that a later challenge fails. Foreign founders sometimes treat the indemnity as a freely negotiated bonus. It is not. The amount is negotiated above a statutory minimum, the slice above that minimum is handled differently for tax and social charges, and the payslip, the DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly electronic payroll return through which the employer declares wages and contributions) and the final documents must reflect the operation exactly. Get this half right and the separation becomes what it should be: a former employee who received a fair sum, keeps unemployment rights, and has no reason to sue.

A. Compute a severance at or above the legal floor and run it correctly through payroll, tax and social charges

The floor first. Article L. 1234-9 of the Labour Code grants the dismissal indemnity to an employee on a permanent contract with at least 8 months of uninterrupted seniority with the same employer, except in cases of serious misconduct, and the rupture indemnity cannot fall below it. The rates are set by regulation: article R. 1234-2 of the Labour Code fixes them, word for word, at “Un quart de mois de salaire par année d’ancienneté pour les années jusqu’à dix ans”, one quarter of a month’s salary per year of seniority for the first ten years, and “Un tiers de mois de salaire par année d’ancienneté pour les années à partir de dix ans”, one third of a month’s salary per year beyond ten years, with pro-rata counting of complete months for incomplete years. Take a concrete example: your first employee earns 3,000 euros gross per month with two full years of seniority. The legal floor is 2 multiplied by one quarter of 3,000, which is 1,500 euros. If your sector collective agreement, the convention collective applicable to your company, provides a higher formula, that higher conventional amount becomes the floor, and the administration checks it: remember the 2018 case, where approval was refused precisely because the agreed sum sat below the conventional minimum. In practice, foreign employers usually offer more than the floor to secure a genuinely free consent and a fast signature, often several months of salary. That supplement is lawful and common, but it changes the tax and social treatment, so compute both slices separately: the slice corresponding to the legal or conventional minimum, and the negotiated supplement above it.

The tax and social treatment then follows the slices. The specific rupture indemnity is exempt from income tax within statutory ceilings, and partly exempt from employee and employer social contributions, from the CSG-CRDS (contribution sociale généralisée and contribution au remboursement de la dette sociale, the two social levies on income) and from the payroll declaration bases, again within ceilings that depend on the amounts and on whether the employee can claim a full pension. Above those ceilings, the surplus is taxable and subject to contributions like salary, and since 2023 a specific employer levy applies to rupture indemnities paid to employees who can already draw a full retirement pension. The exact ceilings move with the PASS (plafond annuel de la Sécurité sociale, the annual social security ceiling, 47,100 euros for 2025, updated each year) and with the employee’s situation, so do not apply a remembered percentage from another year or another country. Ask your French accountant or payroll provider to model the two slices before you sign, because the net amount the employee receives and the total cost to the company both depend on it, and the model should appear in the interview discussion so consent covers the real figures. Run the payment through the final payslip and the DSN like any wage item with its specific contribution codes, keep the payslip, the DSN acknowledgements and the transfer proof, and never pay the indemnity in cash or from a foreign account outside payroll: URSSAF (the contribution collection network) treats off-payroll payments as concealed wages, and the audit guide on facing a URSSAF audit from abroad shows how expensive that finding becomes. One further payroll point: the rupture indemnity does not replace the sums the employee has already earned. Untaken paid leave, the pro-rata contractual bonus, the compensatory payment for accrued RTT days where applicable, and the notice that is not worked are settled separately in the final payment, the solde de tout compte, and each line should be itemised so the employee understands what is severance and what is earned wage.

Timing matters as much as arithmetic. The severance is due at the end of the contract, which by law falls the day after approval at the earliest, and late payment produces interest and a credible grievance. If cash flow is tight, negotiate the termination date further out rather than promising a deferred indemnity the form does not provide for: a rupture date two or three months after the expected approval leaves time to fund the payment while keeping the procedure clean. Where the employee holds company equipment, access badges or a vehicle, organise restitution around the end date in a written inventory signed by both sides. And if the employee asks for a reference letter or an agreed description of the departure for future employers, provide a truthful one: it costs nothing and removes a frequent source of post-separation bitterness. By contrast, never make the signature conditional on the employee waiving in advance any right to challenge the agreement. Advance waivers of the right to sue are void in French employment law, and proposing one suggests the very pressure that annuls consent.

B. Deliver the closing documents and survive the 12-month challenge window

When the contract ends, three documents must be handed to the employee with the final payment: the certificat de travail (the employment certificate stating the positions held and the dates of employment), the attestation France Travail (the certificate for France Travail, the public employment service formerly called Pôle emploi, which allows the former employee to claim unemployment benefits), and the solde de tout compte (the itemised receipt for all sums paid at departure). Generate the attestation through the France Travail employer portal or your payroll software, transmit the DSN termination signals, and remove the employee from the registre unique du personnel (the single staff register every employer must keep) with the departure date. A rupture conventionnelle preserves unemployment rights, unlike a resignation, which is one reason employees accept it: make sure the France Travail attestation bears the correct reason for departure, because an error here delays benefits and creates the dispute you paid to avoid. If your employee was still in the trial period, the rupture conventionnelle was the wrong tool altogether: during the probationary period either side can end the contract under the lighter trial rules, as explained in the guide on managing the trial period from abroad, and signing a rupture conventionnelle for an employee who could simply be released wastes the severance and the approval procedure.

Then comes the quiet period. Article L. 1237-14 of the Labour Code closes its approval paragraph with the jurisdictional rule: “Tout litige concernant la convention, l’homologation ou le refus d’homologation relève de la compétence du conseil des prud’hommes”, meaning every dispute about the agreement, the approval or its refusal belongs to the labour court, the conseil de prud’hommes, the elected court that hears individual employment disputes. The employee has 12 months from the notification of the rupture to challenge it: article L. 1471-1 of the Labour Code states that “Toute action portant sur la rupture du contrat de travail se prescrit par douze mois à compter de la notification de la rupture”, meaning any action concerning the termination of the contract is time-barred 12 months after notification of the rupture. If the court annuls the agreement, for a missing interview, an indemnity below the floor, a truncated retraction period, an early filing, or a proven vice of consent, the rupture produces the effects of a dismissal without real and serious cause: back pay from the unlawful end date, payment in lieu of notice with its paid leave, the dismissal indemnity, and damages assessed under the statutory scale. The 2018 judgment ended exactly there. Your defence, if a claim ever comes, is the file you built at the time: dated interview invitations, the signed agreement with its two mandatory clauses, proof of the retraction computation, the TéléRC filing receipt, the approval or the expiry calculation, the payroll records and the closing documents. Keep that file for the limitation period and beyond, in the French company’s records, accessible even if you change accountant. Founders who instead need to end a contract for misconduct or for personal reasons such as poor performance face a different procedure with its own formalities, described in the guide on dismissing a French employee from abroad: never disguise a disciplinary dismissal as a friendly rupture, because a court that finds the consent was forced will reclassify the operation and add the sanctions for dismissal without cause to the sanctions for procedural breach.

Conclusion

The rupture conventionnelle is the French way to part on good terms: a real interview where the employee may come assisted, a written agreement that states a severance at or above the legal floor and an end date after the approval, 15 calendar days during which either side may withdraw, then a 15-working-day examination by the DREETS with silence counting as approval. From abroad, the discipline is the same as from Paris, with one extra requirement: organise every step so it leaves a dated trace, from the interview invitation to the TéléRC receipt, because distance makes oral arrangements unverifiable. Price the severance honestly with your accountant before signing, pay it through payroll with the final documents, and keep the complete file for the 12-month challenge period. Handled this way, the separation gives the employee money and unemployment rights, gives the company a clean departure without a dismissal procedure, and gives both sides the one thing a labour dispute can never provide: a certain end date.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago