Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Just Received Its First CFE Bill While You Live Abroad: Pay Before 15 December, Cut It Down or Contest It

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. In 2025 you created a French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or a French SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company divided into parts sociales rather than shares). The Kbis (the official identity certificate of the company, an extract from the trade and companies register kept by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court) arrived, the company started trading, and you thought the tax side was settled: corporate income tax once a year, VAT (value added tax) on invoices, payroll charges through URSSAF (the network of offices that collects French social security contributions) if you hired. Then October 2026 brings a surprise inside your espace professionnel (the professional online account of the company on the impots.gouv.fr website, the portal of the French tax administration): an avis de CFE (a CFE tax notice, the bill for the cotisation foncière des entreprises, the local business tax every French company pays). The amount runs from a few hundred to a few thousand euros, the deadline reads 15 December, no paper letter was ever posted to you, and nobody told you this tax existed. This article explains who really owes the CFE, why your first bill is computed the way it is, and how to pay it, reduce it or challenge it without flying to France.

French local business taxation follows its own calendar and its own logic, and foreign founders discover it late because it has no equivalent in most Anglo-Saxon systems. It is not a tax on profit, it is not VAT, and it is due even when the company loses money. Part I describes the scope of the tax and the arithmetic behind your bill: the persons liable, the exemption for the year of creation, the rental value of the premises used two years earlier, and the minimum base that catches almost every domiciled startup. Part II gives the operating method from abroad: which forms to file and when, how to pay inside the professional account before 15 December, which reliefs to claim, and how to file a formal tax complaint and, if needed, go to the administrative court. Every decisive statement below is anchored to the article of the French Tax Code (the Code général des impôts, abbreviated CGI) or the Tax Procedures Code (the Livre des procédures fiscales, abbreviated LPF) that creates it.

I. Your first CFE bill explained: who pays the French local business tax and why the amount looks wrong

A. Who owes the CFE, who escapes it in year one, and why your foreign-run SAS or SARL is caught

The CFE is one of the two parts of the contribution économique territoriale (the territorial economic contribution, abbreviated CET, the local tax package paid by businesses). The Tax Code states that “Il est institué une contribution économique territoriale composée d’une cotisation foncière des entreprises et d’une cotisation sur la valeur ajoutée des entreprises.” The second part, the cotisation sur la valeur ajoutée des entreprises (the contribution on business value added, abbreviated CVAE), concerns larger companies; the CFE concerns almost everybody. The persons liable are defined broadly: “La cotisation foncière des entreprises est due chaque année par les personnes physiques ou morales, les entités non dotées de la personnalité morale ou les fiduciaires pour leur activité exercée en vertu d’un contrat de fiducie qui exercent à titre habituel une activité professionnelle non salariée.” Read that sentence carefully: what triggers the tax is carrying on a habitual self-employed professional activity in France, not making a profit, not employing staff, not owning the office. The full text of article 1447 of the French Tax Code adds that renting out buildings, except bare residential lettings below set receipts thresholds, counts as such an activity, and the composition of the territorial contribution is fixed by article 1447-0 of the French Tax Code.

In practice the administration applies this to every legal vehicle: SAS, SASU (the one-person SAS), SARL, EURL (the one-person SARL), branches (succursales) of foreign companies registered in France, and even micro-entrepreneurs (the simplified self-employed regime). If you are still hesitating between vehicles for a new project, our guide to choosing between a French SAS, SARL, branch and subsidiary explains the liability, tax and staffing consequences of each option before you register. Whatever you chose, once the company carries on its activity on 1 January of the tax year, the CFE for the whole year is due. The official guide of the Ministry of the Economy confirms that the tax applies whatever the legal status, the activity or the tax regime, and that micro-enterprises are covered too. That is why your accountant may never have mentioned it: for a French practitioner it is background noise, while for you it is a bill that arrives in a language you do not read, in an online account you rarely open.

Three exemptions matter immediately for a young foreign-run company. First, the year of creation is free of CFE. The Code provides that “En cas de création d’un établissement autre que ceux mentionnés au III, la cotisation foncière des entreprises n’est pas due pour l’année de la création.” So a company created at any point in 2025 owes nothing for 2025 and receives its first bill for 2026, which is exactly your situation if you incorporated last year. The current version of article 1478 of the French Tax Code also states the yearly rule behind the bill: “La cotisation foncière des entreprises est due pour l’année entière par le redevable qui exerce l’activité le 1er janvier.” If you exercised the activity on 1 January 2026, the full 2026 CFE is due even if you close the company in November. Second, businesses whose annual turnover or receipts stay at or below 5,000 euros are exempt; this threshold is recalled in the official doctrine and helps the smallest side projects but rarely a real operating subsidiary. Third, a long list of permanent and temporary exemptions exists: the Code opens that list with the words “Sont exonérés de la cotisation foncière des entreprises”, and article 1459 of the French Tax Code illustrates the logic with cases such as the owner who occasionally rents part of their own home without any repetition. Beyond these illustrations, articles 1449 to 1466F of the Code grant exemptions of right or on request, permanent or temporary, to categories ranging from certain new businesses to specific activities; a foreign founder should always ask the SIE (Service des impôts des entreprises, the business tax office that manages the company’s file) in writing whether one of those provisions covers the company before paying without discussion.

A common misunderstanding must be cleared up at this stage. The CFE is not the taxe foncière (the property tax paid by the owner of a building) and it is not a rent. When you rent an office in Paris, Lyon or Bordeaux, the landlord pays the taxe foncière as owner and you pay the CFE as the business occupying the premises; when you only buy a domiciliation address (a registered-office service that lends you a prestigious address plus mail forwarding, without real floor space), you still pay the CFE on a minimum base, as Part I.B explains. Another misunderstanding concerns groups: each French company of the group is taxed separately where its own principal establishment sits, and a French branch of your foreign parent is taxed in France on the same basis as a subsidiary for the activity it carries on here. Intra-group re-invoicing does not move the CFE elsewhere.

B. How the amount is computed: the rental value of year N-2, the minimum base that catches startups, and the Paris specifics

The base of the CFE is not your turnover and not your profit. It is the valeur locative (the notional rental value used by French local taxation) of the premises subject to property tax that the taxpayer had at its disposal for its professional activity during the reference period. The Code states that “La cotisation foncière des entreprises a pour base la valeur locative des biens passibles d’une taxe foncière situés en France”, and the applicable version is article 1467 of the French Tax Code. The reference period mechanism means, in plain terms, that the CFE billed in year N is computed on the premises used in year N-2: the official doctrine gives the example that the CFE due for 2026 looks at the property occupied in 2024. For industrial premises the rental value is reduced by 30 percent before the rate is applied, and property destroyed or sold during the reference period is excluded. The amount of the tax is then the base multiplied by the rate voted each year by the commune (the municipality) or the EPCI (établissement public de coopération intercommunale, the inter-municipal body that may receive the tax instead of the commune). Two identical offices in two neighbouring towns therefore produce two different bills, and Paris, which is both commune and département (county), votes its own rate, which is why a Paris address systematically costs more than the same surface in a small town.

Most foreign founders are not taxed on real premises at all in their first billed year. Because the company was created in 2025, it occupied nothing in 2024, the N-2 reference year, so the rental-value base is zero or tiny — and that is precisely when the cotisation minimum (the minimum CFE contribution) takes over. The Code provides that “Les redevables de la cotisation foncière des entreprises sont assujettis à une cotisation minimum établie au lieu de leur principal établissement”, and the current article 1647 D of the French Tax Code organises that minimum around a base fixed by the municipal council within a statutory scale driven by the turnover or receipts of year N-2. In plain figures, the scale runs from a base of a few hundred euros for turnover up to 10,000 euros to a base of several thousand euros above 500,000 euros of turnover, with intermediate steps at 32,600, 100,000 and 250,000 euros. Your commune then multiplies the base it chose inside that scale by its rate. A domiciled SAS with no office and 40,000 euros of first turnover typically receives a bill between 500 and 1,200 euros depending on the commune; the same company domiciled in Paris pays the Paris minimum base at the Paris rate, which is public and consultable, and that single line explains nine first bills out of ten that look arbitrary to a founder abroad.

Two additions complete the bill. The CFE carries a taxe additionnelle (an additional levy) that finances the CCI (chambre de commerce et d’industrie, the chamber of commerce and industry) and, for craft businesses, the CMA (chambre de métiers et de l’artisanat, the chamber of trades); it is assessed on the same base and its regional rate is voted each year. And the bill you see online already includes the collection costs of the State. None of this is negotiable by phone: the rate, the minimum base and the additional levies are voted by local bodies and applied by software. What is negotiable — or rather contestable — is the factual basis: the premises attributed to you, the turnover bracket used for the minimum base, the principal establishment taken into account, and your eligibility for an exemption. That is the whole subject of Part II, and the sooner you check those four points, the sooner an excessive bill shrinks to its lawful size.

Paris and the Île-de-France (the Paris region) deserve a special paragraph because most foreign-run companies are domiciled there. In Paris the minimum base and the rate are voted by the Council of Paris, acting as municipal council, and they apply uniformly whether your real activity sits in the 8th arrondissement or your company only holds a domiciliation address near Opéra while you work from abroad. The competent SIE for a Paris company depends on the arrondissement of the registered office, and it is that office — not the head office in London or Delaware — that receives your letters and your complaint. Practical consequence: keep the registered-office address stable during your first three years, because every move changes the taxing commune, the minimum base and the SIE in charge, and the N-2 mechanism will make you pay the consequences of a 2026 move on your 2028 bill, when you have long forgotten the move itself. Founders who hop between domiciliators to save fifty euros a month regularly manufacture their own CFE disputes two years later.

II. Pay, reduce or contest your CFE from abroad before 15 December: forms, payment and remedies

A. Declare and pay from abroad: the 1447-C form, the online notice, the 15 June instalment and the 15 December balance

Start with the declaration duty, because missing it is the most frequent and most expensive mistake of foreign founders. The Code requires taxpayers to declare the elements used to assess the CFE in the year before the tax year, and the wording is strict: “Les contribuables doivent déclarer les éléments servant à l’établissement de la cotisation foncière des entreprises l’année précédant celle de l’imposition au plus tard le deuxième jour ouvré suivant le 1er mai”. That is article 1477 of the French Tax Code, and it also imposes a provisional declaration before 1 January of the year following a creation, a change of operator or a change of activity. In everyday terms: after creating your company in 2025, you had to file the initial declaration, form 1447-C-SD, before 1 January 2026 for the CFE due in 2027 and the following years, and you must file form 1447-M-SD before the second working day after 1 May whenever a change affects the base — new premises, larger surface, closure of an establishment, end of an exemption. Once filed, there is no annual return to repeat: the administration rolls the file forward and bills every autumn. But if you never filed the initial declaration, the SIE assesses you by default, often on an overstated base, and the bill you discover in October is the price of that silence. Filing the missing form now does not cancel the current bill automatically, but it secures the following years and it supports the complaint you file against the current one.

The notice itself lives only online, and this is the second shock for founders abroad. Since the general move to paperless business taxation, the CFE notice is posted in the espace professionnel on impots.gouv.fr and no paper copy is mailed; the Ministry of the Economy states that your notice is available online and must be consulted from your professional account. If your accountant created that account with their own email address, you may never see the notice until a reminder with penalties arrives. Fix the access chain today: professional account activated, your own backup email or your accountant’s address monitored weekly between September and December, bank details (a SEPA-compatible business account, French or not) registered for online payment. Payment itself must use a dematerialised channel: direct online payment inside the account, monthly direct debit, or debit on the due date. The Ministry’s doctrine is explicit that the amount must be settled by a dematerialised means of payment, and a taxpayer who already holds an automatic debit contract is debited in the days following the deadline without any new step. For a founder abroad, the monthly debit (prélèvement mensuel) is usually the safest choice: it spreads the unknown local taxes across the year and removes the December scramble, provided you join before 30 June of the current year.

The payment calendar for 2026 works as follows. If your company’s CFE for the previous year reached or exceeded 3,000 euros and you did not choose monthly payment, you pay in two parts: an instalment of 50 percent of the previous year’s CFE by 15 June 2026 inclusive, then the balance by 15 December 2026 inclusive after deduction of the instalment. Below that threshold you pay once, by 15 December. These dates sit inside the broader annual discipline of a French company — approving the accounts within six months of the year end, filing them with the greffe, paying corporate tax instalments — which our annual legal calendar for French companies run from abroad maps month by month. Mark 15 December as a hard wall: after that date the standard 10 percent increase and late interest attach automatically, the file passes to enforced collection, and any later complaint must fight both the base and the penalties. Paying on time never prevents you from complaining afterwards; the payment and the complaint are two separate tracks, and the wise founder runs both in parallel rather than withholding payment as a protest, which French tax law treats as a second mistake added to the first.

Paying from abroad raises three concrete questions. First, the account: online payment inside the espace professionnel accepts the registered bank details, so register valid SEPA details well before December and test them with a small amount if the interface allows; a rejected debit on 14 December leaves no time to fix anything. Second, the proof: download and keep the payment receipt and the notice itself as PDFs every year, because the N-2 mechanism means today’s notice is tomorrow’s evidence — when you contest the 2028 bill computed on 2026 premises, the 2026 notice and the 2026 lease will be your exhibits. Third, the delegation: if your French accountant pays on your behalf, give a written mandate limited to viewing notices and paying local taxes, and require a monthly screenshot of the professional account between September and January. Founders who learn in March that their accountant never opened the October notice pay the penalties for someone else’s inbox.

B. Cut the bill down or have it cancelled: exemptions, cessation, wrong base, formal complaint and the administrative court

Before paying an excessive bill without discussion, work through the four checks that actually reduce or cancel a CFE assessment. First check: the creation-year exemption. If the company, or the establishment billed, was created during the billed year, the Code exempts it, and the SIE cancels on simple proof of the creation date shown on the Kbis. This check also catches a frequent error: an establishment created in the billed year but billed because the SIE coded it as a transfer of an existing business rather than a creation. A transfer keeps the tax alive; a genuine creation kills it for that year. Second check: cessation and change of operator. A taxpayer who stops every activity in an establishment owes nothing for the remaining full months, except where the business was sold or transferred. Close the Paris office in March, terminate the lease, strike the establishment off the trade register, and the months after cessation drop out — but only if the cessation is real, dated and registered, not merely the end of actual use while the lease and the registration survive. The same article that grants the creation-year exemption governs this pro-rata rule, so read article 1478 of the French Tax Code as a whole before writing to the SIE.

Third check: the exemptions of articles 1449 to 1466F and the small-turnover exclusion. Beyond the illustrations of article 1459 of the French Tax Code, the Code shelters categories that a foreign founder would never guess: certain new businesses, businesses in designated development or innovation zones, young innovative companies, and specific activities from press publishers to live-show entrepreneurs. Each exemption has its own conditions, duration and formalities — some apply automatically, others require an express request before a deadline — and the official doctrine lists them zone by zone. Do not claim a zone exemption from memory of a blog post: write to the SIE, describe the registered office, the activity code (the APE code, the official activity classification assigned at registration), the headcount and the creation date, and ask which provision, if any, covers the company. Fourth check: the base itself. Compare the notice line by line with reality: the address of the principal establishment, the surface and rental value retained, the N-2 turnover bracket used for the minimum base, and any premises you vacated before the reference year. A company domiciled with a domiciliator but billed on a full office it never occupied, a minimum base computed on a turnover year that included an exceptional one-off invoice, or premises kept on the roll two years after the lease ended — each of these is a factual error that a documented complaint corrects.

The complaint procedure starts with a réclamation (a formal tax complaint) sent to the SIE, and French law gives this step a precise legal nature. The Procedures Code provides that “Les réclamations relatives aux impôts, contributions, droits, taxes, redevances, soultes et pénalités de toute nature, établis ou recouvrés par les agents de l’administration, relèvent de la juridiction contentieuse lorsqu’elles tendent à obtenir soit la réparation d’erreurs commises dans l’assiette ou le calcul des impositions, soit le bénéfice d’un droit résultant d’une disposition législative ou réglementaire.” That is article L190 of the Tax Procedures Code: your letter asking for the correction of the base or the benefit of an exemption is contentious litigation from day one, not a favour requested from the administration. Send it from the secure messaging of the espace professionnel so the filing is timestamped, state the tax, the year and the amount, set out each ground separately with its exhibit (Kbis, lease and its termination, turnover statement for year N-2, exemption provision invoked), and quantify the discharge or reduction requested. Keep the tone factual and the file complete: an SIE officer who finds every proof in the first message grants faster than one who must write back for the lease.

If the SIE rejects the complaint expressly or stays silent, the dispute moves to the tribunal administratif (the administrative court that hears tax cases at first instance), and the clock is short. The justice rules state that “La juridiction ne peut être saisie que par voie de recours formé contre une décision, et ce, dans les deux mois à partir de la notification ou de la publication de la décision attaquée.” That is article R421-1 of the Administrative Justice Code: two months from the express rejection, or, where the administration stayed silent, from the implied rejection born after its silence period. File through Télérecours (the online filing system of the administrative courts), attach the complaint and its exhibits plus the rejection, and ask for the discharge of the assessment and, where applicable, the penalties. A founder living abroad needs no travel: representation by a French lawyer covers the written procedure, and the company’s registered office in France fixes jurisdiction at the court of that place. One warning closes this section: never let the two-month window expire while negotiating informally with the SIE. Negotiation does not suspend the deadline, and a director who discovers in month three that the friendly emails changed nothing has lost the case on procedure before ever arguing the base.

Conclusion

Your first CFE bill is not a fine, not a scam and not a mistake of principle: it is the entry ticket to French local business taxation, computed on premises used two years ago or, for young companies, on a statutory minimum base at the registered office. The founders who pay too much are rarely those with the largest offices; they are those who never filed form 1447-C-SD, never opened the espace professionnel, moved the registered office without thinking of the N-2 mirror, or let 15 December pass while hoping the bill would vanish. Run the method in order: confirm the creation-year position, verify the principal establishment and the N-2 turnover bracket, file the missing declarations, pay by dematerialised means before 15 December, and send a documented réclamation for every error you found. Do this once, properly, and the CFE becomes what it should be for a well-run foreign-owned French company: a predictable local charge, billed every autumn, paid in a few clicks from abroad, and forgotten until the next year.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago