Shareholders' agreement — founders, investors, managers
Shareholders agreement lawyer Paris: organising decision-making, exit and valuation.
Confidential where the articles of association are public, a shareholders' agreement sets out the priced exit, the detailed governance, anti-dilution and vesting. A shareholders agreement lawyer in Paris relies on its contractual force under Article 1103 of the French Civil Code (Code civil), and promises to transfer shares can now be enforced by the courts.
The agreement is negotiated before signing the investor's term sheet, never after: the exit terms imposed by the fund are discussed while you can still say no.
Shareholders' agreement · Paris
Get a first analysis
Before a fundraising, when an equity manager joins or in the face of a breach: send the articles of association, the capitalisation table and the existing agreement. The firm replies within 24 business hours.
24 à 48 h
first legal
review
Kohen Avocats, Paris 17
Shareholders' agreement: what really decides the case
Company law · Paris 17th arrondissement
What a shareholders' agreement lawyer in Paris does
- Paris Bar
- Company law
- Firm in Paris, 17th arrondissement
Lawyer at the Paris Bar — shareholders' agreements and governance.
A shareholders' agreement is relevant from two shareholders onwards and becomes indispensable when an investor or an equity manager comes in. It governs governance (veto, information), exit (drag, tag, leaver, vesting), valuation (formula or expert under Article 1843-4) and anti-dilution. As a contract within the meaning of Article 1103, its breach opens the way to specific performance, damages or termination. The promisor's withdrawal no longer prevents the promised sale from being formed: forced transfer can be argued and won.
Send what you have, even if incomplete: the firm will prioritise and complete the file with you. In an emergency, call +33 6 46 60 58 22.
Official profile in the directory of French lawyers (CNB)Firm at 11 rue Margueritte, 75017 Paris
Detailed governance
Veto over key decisions, quorum, strategic committee, enhanced information rights: the agreement organises power without exposing the strategy on the public register.
Organised exit
Drag along (forced exit), tag along (joint exit), good and bad leaver with a discounted price: the promises rest on Article 1124 of the French Civil Code and have been enforceable by the courts since 2016.
Valuation planned in advance
Price formula (EBITDA multiple, last round) or expert under Article 1843-4: an agreement without a price formula ends up being settled before a judge.
The clauses
What the agreement regulates and the articles of association cannot say
Four families of clauses structure the agreement.
- Governance: veto decisions (sale of assets, borrowing, issue of securities, change of corporate object), supervisory committee, enhanced information rights, arbitration clause.
- Exit: drag along, tag along, good and bad leaver, founder vesting with a cliff — each clause rests on the unilateral promise under Article 1124 of the French Civil Code.
- Valuation: a calculation formula updated annually, or an expert appointed by the parties or by the president of the commercial court (Article 1843-4) — a shareholder who refuses to provide the accounts to the expert is exposed to urgent application proceedings (Cass. com., 27 November 2024, No. 23-17.536).
- Anti-dilution and liquidation preference: protection of value in the event of a down round, with formulas whose dilutive effects differ greatly for founders.
Courts enforce promises in shareholders' agreements: a clause requiring the defaulting shareholder to buy or sell their shares is not annulled under Article L. 227-15 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) on the ground that it contravenes a clause of the articles of association on exclusion, as that provision governs neither the exclusion of a shareholder nor the forced transfer of shares that follows (Cass. com., 21 June 2023, No. 21-25.952), and a unilateral promise to sell is specifically enforceable despite the promisor's withdrawal, even for a contract predating the 2016 reform (Cass. com., 15 March 2023, No. 21-20.399).
Your documents
What you need to provide to draft or audit
The agreement is drafted around the actual shareholder structure and the exit horizon.
Position A
Founders
- Current articles of association and capitalisation table
- Exit intentions and liquidity horizon
- Investor's term sheet, if any
- Job offers to equity managers
Position B
Investor or manager
- Existing agreement and amendments
- Desired governance terms
- Protection mechanisms requested: anti-dilution, liquidation preference
- Proposed vesting schedule
Frequent mistakes: signing the term sheet before negotiating the agreement; drafting a vague leaver clause that is inoperative at closing.
The firm also drafts:
- Shotgun clause (buy or sell)
- Arbitration clause
- Inalienability (10 years maximum in an SAS)
- Enforcement mandates
The method
How the firm supports you
Rushing the price formula turns an hour saved into months of litigation.
Step 1
Strategic framing
Shareholder structure, intentions, exit horizon, trade-offs on capital and operations.
Step 2
Review of the articles of association
Consistency with the public articles of association, identification of contradictions to be resolved, hierarchy of the instruments.
Step 3
Drafting and negotiation
Drag, tag, leaver, anti-dilution, price formulas, penalty clause; exchange of drafts and quantified compromises.
Step 4
Signature and enforcement
Signature on the same day as the articles of association, safekeeping, then enforcement: formal notice, specific performance or termination in the event of a breach.
In the event of a breach: specific performance of the transfer, damages (penalty clause) or unilateral termination by notification (Article 1226 of the French Civil Code).
The timetable
The timeline of a shareholders' agreement
From the term sheet to signature, then to enforcement.
Framing
Week 1. Shareholder structure, intentions, exit horizon, difficult points identified.
Review of the articles
Week 2. Consistency between articles and agreement, contradictions resolved article by article.
Outline
Weeks 2-3. Term sheet or first outline, alternatives on sensitive clauses, validation by the founders.
Drafting
Weeks 3-4. Full agreement: governance, exit, valuation, anti-dilution, penalty clause.
Negotiation
Weeks 4-5. Drafts exchanged, quantified compromises, approval by each signatory.
Signing
Electronic signature on the same day as the articles of association, recording in the register of commitments.
The checks
What the firm checks before signature
Nothing is signed until these points have been validated.
- Consistency between agreement and articles, hierarchy of the two instruments clarified.
- Robust price formula or Article 1843-4 expert clause with an obligation to provide the accounts.
- Precise leaver clauses: definitions of good and bad leaver, quantified discount, vesting schedule.
- Calibrated drag and tag: thresholds, floor price, notification procedures.
- Anti-dilution: formula chosen with knowledge of the dilutive effects for founders.
- Enforceability: Article 1124 promises, enforcement mandates, proportionate penalty clause.
Summary
Situation, risk, clause, decision
The most frequent configurations seen in practice in shareholders' agreements.
Situation
Two 50/50 founders
Main risk: Complete deadlock and impossibility of selling.
Clause to include: Buy or sell (shotgun clause) or arbitration.
Recommended decision: Provide a pre-agreed exit mechanism.
Situation
First investor round within twelve months
Main risk: Exit terms imposed by the fund.
Clause to include: Drag along, tag along, liquidation preference.
Recommended decision: Negotiate the agreement before signing the term sheet.
Situation
Equity manager hired on a permanent contract
Main risk: Departure before maturity, loss of founder value.
Clause to include: Four-year vesting, twelve-month cliff, leaver.
Recommended decision: Align the agreement with the job offer.
Situation
Historic investor not yet cashed out
Main risk: No transfer mechanism, capital locked in.
Clause to include: Unilateral promise to repurchase, dated deadline.
Recommended decision: Document liquidity before three years.
Situation
Agreement signed without a price formula
Main risk: Disagreement on valuation, lengthy expert assessment.
Clause to include: Quantified formula or recourse to an Article 1843-4 expert.
Recommended decision: Draft the formula in an appendix, with annual review.
Situation
Founder removed from office
Main risk: Keeps the shares without any contribution to the project.
Clause to include: Bad leaver with discount, good leaver at value.
Recommended decision: Distinguish the reasons for departure and put figures on them.
Frequently asked questions
Your questions: shareholders' agreement
What is the difference between the articles of association and a shareholders' agreement?
The articles of association are public, enforceable against third parties and establish the company's existence. A shareholders' agreement is a private contract between its signatories: more flexible and confidential, it regulates what the articles cannot say with as much precision: priced exit, valuation, enhanced governance, anti-dilution, founder vesting. The articles bind everyone; the agreement binds only its signatories. In practice, the two documents are drafted together and signed on the same day.
How long should a shareholders' agreement last?
Most often ten years, with tacit renewal. Beyond that, certain commitments, notably inalienability in an SAS under Article L. 227-13 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce), are capped at ten years. The agreement may provide for a term aligned with the intended exit (stock market listing, industrial sale) or with the duration of a structuring loan. An annual review is recommended.
Can a shareholders' agreement be enforced by the courts?
Yes, where the clause amounts to a unilateral promise to sell or buy that is sufficiently precise as to its subject matter and price. The Court of Cassation has confirmed that Article 1124 of the French Civil Code allows the beneficiary to obtain the promised contract despite the promisor's withdrawal (Cass. com., 15 March 2023, No. 21-20.399, under the law prior to the 2016 reform). For shares of an SAS, the Court held in 2023 that the nullity provided for by Article L. 227-15 of the Commercial Code sanctions only breach of a clause in the articles of association concerning a freely agreed transfer of shares, and not the forced transfer that follows the exclusion of a shareholder (Cass. com., 21 June 2023, No. 21-25.952).
What are the standard exit clauses in a shareholders' agreement?
Three families: drag along (forced exit imposed by the majority shareholder), tag along (joint exit for the benefit of the minority shareholder), leaver (the fate of the shares of a founder or manager who leaves). These are often supplemented by a right of first refusal, a right of pre-emption for the other shareholders, and a buy or sell (shotgun) clause in the event of a 50/50 deadlock.
How is valuation set in a shareholders' agreement?
Three options: a fixed value annexed and revised annually, a formula with figures (EBITDA multiple, net asset value), or recourse to an expert appointed under Article 1843-4 of the French Civil Code in the event of disagreement. Best practice combines a readable formula with recourse to an expert in the event of a dispute. The expert assessment binds the parties within the limits of the procedures laid down in the agreement.
Drag along and tag along: what should be negotiated?
For the drag: the trigger threshold (often 50% or 66% of the share capital), the scope (all shares or only certain categories), the information timetable, enforceability against new entrants. For the tag: the eligible share (proportional or full), the response period, the price formula applied. Vague drafting makes the clause inoperative at closing.
Bad leaver and good leaver: what is the impact on the price?
The good leaver (departure through retirement, disability, dismissal without serious cause) allows the shares to be bought back at full expert-assessed value. The bad leaver (resignation before maturity, gross misconduct, unfair competition) triggers a buy-back at a heavily discounted value (often 30 to 70% lower) or at nominal value. The grounds must be listed precisely, and the assessment must be objective.
What is an anti-dilution ratchet clause?
A clause under which an investor receives new shares at no cost if a later capital increase is made at a lower valuation than at its entry (down round). It protects the economic value of the previous round. Several formulas exist (full ratchet, broad-based weighted average, narrow-based weighted average) with very different dilutive effects for founders.
What is the difference between ordinary shares and preference shares?
Preference shares (preferred stock) confer enhanced voting or financial rights: priority dividend, liquidation preference, veto rights, automatic conversion. They are authorised by Articles L. 228-11 et seq. of the Commercial Code and are mainly used in an SAS for fundraising. The agreement specifies the attached rights and the conditions of conversion into ordinary shares.
What should be done if a signatory breaches the agreement?
Three remedies are available: specific performance of the commitment (transfer or buy-back), damages (the penalty clause provided in the agreement or full compensation), and unilateral termination by notification under the conditions of Article 1226 of the French Civil Code. The choice depends on the nature of the commitment and the creditor's commercial interest. A prior formal notice is recommended.
Is a shareholders' agreement enforceable against third parties?
No, as a rule. The agreement binds only its signatories (relative effect of contracts, Article 1199 of the French Civil Code). Third parties acting in good faith cannot have imposed on them a clause of which they are unaware. This is why heavy commitments (inalienability, approval, exclusion) must also appear in the articles of association if they are to take effect against new shareholders or transferees.
Should the agreement be signed by notarial deed or by private signature?
A private signature is sufficient in almost all cases. Qualified electronic signature is now widely used for remote signing between founders and investors. A notarial deed becomes useful where the agreement contains transfers of real estate or gifts between shareholders. The firm manages the electronic signature for you.
How much does it cost to draft a shareholders' agreement?
For a simple agreement between two or three founders with no outside investor, fees start at around €1,800 incl. VAT. For a full agreement with an investor, drag, tag, leaver, anti-dilution and a price formula, the budget is generally between €3,500 and €7,000 incl. VAT depending on the complexity of the round. The firm sends a written quote after an initial discussion.
Which court hears a dispute over the agreement?
Disputes between shareholders fall within the jurisdiction of the commercial court of the registered office, that is, the Paris commercial court (tribunal de commerce) for a company registered in Paris. The agreement may provide for an arbitration clause before a sole arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal, which speeds up the decision and preserves confidentiality. The firm regularly pleads before the Paris commercial court.
Can a shareholders' agreement be amended after signature?
Yes, by an amendment signed between the original parties and any new signatories. Every change must be traceable, dated and signed. When a new investor becomes a shareholder, it is common to sign a new agreement that cancels and replaces the previous one (novation clause). The firm ensures consistency between the old and new commitments.
Sources and related pages
Official texts and related pages
The sources for this page and the firm's related areas of practice.
Further reading
Page updated on 11 June 2026.
Let us arrange a discussion about your agreement.
Before a fundraising, when an equity manager joins or in the face of a breach: send the articles of association, the capitalisation table and the existing agreement. The firm replies within 24 business hours.
The latest news.
What our clients say
Best real estate law and business law lawyer in Paris. A humane and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN
Translated from French
Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law on fraudulent non-disclosure in property sales. It reassures me about an action for annulment that I am considering after buying a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterised by spreading through-cracks and damp stains, not reported by the estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or at his instigation, under a coat of paint and by polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And the said estate agent drafted the preliminary contract, which of course contains no information about any of these defects. Just to add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain that the estate agent thought I would not be able to discover the deception and above all to establish the fraudulent intent, still less to bring legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the procedure... That is why I am opting for the criminal route, insofar as the intentional concealment of the defects by the seller and then by the estate agent amounts to the fraudulent manoeuvres of art. 313-1 of
Translated from French
Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.
Translated from French
I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!
Translated from French
Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.
Translated from French
Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.
Translated from French
As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!
Translated from French
I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz
Translated from French
Very satisfied! I would like to thank Maître Esther Cornu here, who managed to resolve a very complicated dispute in a divorce and family law matter...Thanks to Maître Cornu, a judgment was handed down in my favour even though it was far from a foregone conclusion...So I recommend this law firm
Translated from French
A precise and concrete analysis and an immediate response. Excellent.
Translated from French
I highly recommend this lawyer for his professionalism, honesty, and transparency. He helped me successfully and guided me through the process with great care and expertise. What I particularly appreciated was his honest approach and the fact that he recommended practical, cost-effective options instead of immediately pushing for the most expensive solution. He genuinely focused on finding the right approach for my situation. I’m very grateful for his support and would definitely recommend him to anyone looking for a trustworthy and professional lawyer in France.
Thank you for this detailed, precise help, with a proposal at the end on whether or not to continue (very quick response as well)
Translated from French
Very good advice given by Maître Cornu during our meeting on 16 October.
Translated from French
Very professional and responsive service. The lawyer quickly and carefully checked the validity of my wife’s residence permit in light of a specific legal regime. His work gave us clarity, whereas the usual administrative procedures were long and ambiguous. I appreciated his efficiency and professionalism, and I recommend his services.
Translated from French
I would like to warmly thank Maître Esther Cornu for her professionalism, her availability and the quality of her support. In a case of particular importance for my professional future, she showed great responsiveness, rigour and a gift for explaining things, taking the time to answer my questions precisely and to explain the various legal steps to me. I particularly appreciate the clarity of her analyses, her seriousness and her commitment in following up my case. Many thanks to Maître Esther Cornu for listening and for her support. I highly recommend!
Translated from French
I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Mr Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions about my case instantly. It has become so rare these days to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive and attentive, even when it is simply a matter of answering questions. His answers are clear, precise and reassuring. You can tell that he takes the time to understand the situation and to provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent ratings on Google, it is above all this availability and this seriousness that make the difference. Many thanks to Mr Reda Cohen for his professionalism and his responsiveness. I highly recommend!
Translated from French
A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.
Translated from French
Good experience. And good work, thank you for everything.
Translated from French
Saw Hassan on the TV news
Translated from French
very clear article
Translated from French
Loading…
Your cookies
We use cookies to measure the effectiveness of our campaigns and improve the site. You can change your choice at any time.
