Insolvency proceedings — debtors and creditors
Insolvency proceedings lawyer in Paris: safeguard, reorganisation, liquidation and claim filing.
Insolvency proceedings run on a timeline: each step opens a time limit and demands a quick decision. The firm acts as insolvency proceedings lawyer in Paris, assisting the debtor at the opening and during the observation period, and creditors in filing, contesting and reclaiming.
Two countdowns dominate: forty-five days to declare cessation of payments (cessation des paiements) on the director's side, and two months from publication in the BODACC (the French official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements) to file a claim on the creditor's side — failing which the claim is unenforceable against the proceedings.
Insolvency proceedings · Paris
Get a first analysis
Cessation of payments to declare, a claim to save or a director to defend: send the cash-flow statement or the opening judgment. In this field every day counts — reply within 24 business hours.
24 à 48 h
first legal
review
Kohen Avocats, Paris 17
Insolvency proceedings: what really decides the case
Business law · Paris 17th arrondissement
What an insolvency proceedings lawyer in Paris does
- Paris Bar
- Business law
- Firm in Paris 17th
Lawyer at the Paris Bar — safeguard, judicial reorganisation, judicial liquidation and claim filing.
Cessation of payments — liabilities that are due and payable and not covered by available assets, credit reserves included — must be declared within forty-five days. The opening judgment suspends individual proceedings, freezes pre-opening liabilities and appoints the supervising judge (juge-commissaire), the administrator and the creditors' representative. Prior claims must be filed within two months; post-judgment claims useful to the proceedings are paid when due, under Article L. 622-17 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce). In liquidation, the shortfall in assets exposes a director at fault, within the limit of its amount.
Send what you have, even if incomplete: the firm will prioritise and complete the file with you. In an emergency, call +33 6 46 60 58 22.
Official profile in the directory of French lawyers (CNB)Firm at 11 rue Margueritte, 75017 Paris
Three proceedings, one dividing line
Safeguard without cessation of payments (Article L. 620-1), reorganisation as soon as payments have ceased (Article L. 631-1), liquidation when reorganisation is manifestly impossible (Article L. 640-1).
Filing a claim is vital
Within two months of the BODACC publication (Article L. 622-24): the filing counts as a claim in court, interrupts the limitation period and preserves security interests. Failing that, the claim becomes unenforceable against the proceedings.
Three exits from the observation period
A continuation plan after debt restructuring, a sale plan with a buyer, or liquidation — cash flow during the observation period decides.
The timeline
From the finding of cessation to the plan or liquidation
Four rules structure insolvency proceedings.
- Cessation of payments is assessed at a given moment: a director who can show credit reserves or moratoria covering the liabilities due is not in cessation (Article L. 631-1); otherwise, it must be declared within forty-five days (Article L. 631-4).
- The opening judgment suspends individual proceedings, freezes pre-opening liabilities and appoints the bodies of the proceedings: supervising judge, administrator, creditors' representative.
- Prior claims are filed with the creditors' representative within two months of the BODACC publication (Article L. 622-24): amount, nature, security interests — the filing counts as a claim in court.
- A shortfall in assets (Article L. 651-2) requires a contributory management fault assessed individually (decision linked on this page), with the amount of the liability set by the trial judges, within the limit of the shortfall, without review of its proportionality by the Court of Cassation (Cass. com., 9 May 2018, No. 16-26.684).
Exits from the observation period need preparing: a continuation plan if margins are rebuilt, a sale plan if a buyer preserves the business and jobs, liquidation otherwise. Commingling of assets (Article L. 621-2) extends the proceedings to companies linked by abnormal financial flows (decision linked on this page).
Your documents
What to gather depending on your position
Strict time limits leave no time to build the file after the event.
Position A
Debtor
- Cash-flow statement and dated liabilities due
- Annual accounts and a recent financial position
- List of creditors and ongoing proceedings
- Headcount, key contracts, leases and financing
Position B
Creditor
- Opening judgment and BODACC date
- Supporting documents for the claim: contracts, invoices, signed payment schedules, emails confirming the service
- Security interests and retention-of-title clauses
- For rent: a statement separating amounts before and after the judgment
Frequent errors: a claim filed out of time (an application for relief from time bar must be brought before the supervising judge within six months); post-judgment rent not claimed when due.
The firm also handles:
- Relief from the time bar
- Challenge to a claim
- Reclaiming goods
- Suspect period
The method
How the firm supports you
Identifying the current stage calibrates the defence, the timetable and the effort required.
Step 1
Diagnosis and filing
Finding of cessation of payments, calculation of the available time, declaration or application for conciliation within forty-five days.
Step 2
Opening and bodies of the proceedings
Opening hearing, appointment of the bodies, communication with the administrator and the creditors' representative.
Step 3
Observation period
Continued trading under supervision, preparation of the continuation plan or sale plan, management of post-judgment claims.
Step 4
Exit and defence
Adoption of the plan or liquidation; filing and contesting of claims on the creditor's side; defence of the director against penalty actions.
Key points: observation period of six months, renewable; claim filed within two months; action for shortfall in assets time-barred after three years.
The timetable
The typical timeline of a proceeding
Each step opens a time limit and demands a quick decision.
Finding
Day 0. Cessation of payments diagnosed from the cash position: the forty-five-day countdown begins.
Referral
Within 45 days. Declaration of cessation of payments or application for conciliation to the commercial court.
Opening judgment
Safeguard, reorganisation or liquidation; supervising judge, administrator and creditors' representative appointed; individual proceedings suspended.
2 months from the BODACC
Prior claims filed with the creditors' representative, security interests stated.
Observation
6 months, renewable. Continued trading, economic and social assessment, preparation of the plan.
Exit
Continuation plan, sale plan or liquidation; possible examination of the director's liability.
The checks
What the firm checks from the outset
Strict time limits govern everything.
- Exact date of cessation of payments and computation of the forty-five days.
- Choice of proceedings: safeguard, reorganisation, liquidation — documented viability.
- On the creditor's side: BODACC date, two-month time limit, content of the claim.
- Useful post-judgment claims (Article L. 622-17) paid when due.
- Suspect period: preferential payments and voidable acts.
- Director's exposure: management fault, commingling of assets, personal bankruptcy.
Summary
Situation, risk, act, decision
The most frequent configurations the firm sees in insolvency proceedings.
Creditor's situation
Claim arising before the opening judgment
Main risk: Total unenforceability for want of filing.
Action required: File the claim with the creditors' representative within two months.
Recommended decision: Send the claim by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt, with supporting documents.
Creditor's situation
Creditor holding a registered security interest
Main risk: Time limit running from the personal notice.
Action required: File the claim within the time limit notified.
Recommended decision: Keep the notice as evidence.
Creditor's situation
Claim filed out of time
Main risk: Time bar and loss of the right.
Action required: Apply for relief from time bar (L. 622-26).
Recommended decision: Show that the default is not attributable to the creditor.
Creditor's situation
Challenge by the creditors' representative
Main risk: Partial or total rejection of the claim.
Action required: Refer the matter to the supervising judge within the time limits.
Recommended decision: Prepare the documents and a written defence.
Creditor's situation
Claim arising after the opening judgment
Main risk: Confusion with pre-opening liabilities.
Action required: Payment when due by the administrator.
Recommended decision: Article L. 622-17, privileged claim.
Creditor's situation
Foreign creditor
Main risk: Time limit extended to four months.
Action required: File the claim within four months of publication.
Recommended decision: Check the translation of the documents.
Frequently asked questions
Your questions: insolvency proceedings
What is the difference between safeguard, reorganisation and judicial liquidation?
The dividing line rests on cessation of payments and viability. Safeguard (Article L. 620-1 of the French Commercial Code) is open to a debtor who shows difficulties it cannot overcome, without being in cessation of payments. Judicial reorganisation (Article L. 631-1) applies as soon as payments have ceased, where the business remains viable. Judicial liquidation (Article L. 640-1) is opened when reorganisation is manifestly impossible. All three proceedings suspend individual proceedings and freeze pre-opening liabilities, but their purpose differs: continuation, reorganisation or winding up.
How is cessation of payments defined?
Cessation of payments is defined in Article L. 631-1 of the French Commercial Code as the inability to meet liabilities that are due and payable with the available assets. Available assets comprise cash and sums that can be mobilised immediately (credit reserves, moratoria granted by creditors). Liabilities due and payable comprise debts that have fallen due and are certain, liquid and uncontested. Rescheduling obtained suspends the due date. The diagnosis is made at a given moment and checked against the most recent accounts.
What is the forty-five-day time limit for declaring cessation of payments?
Article L. 631-4 of the French Commercial Code requires the director to apply for the opening of reorganisation proceedings within forty-five days of cessation of payments, unless an application for conciliation has been made within that period. Exceeding the time limit is a management fault that can ground an action for liability for shortfall in assets (L. 651-2) and an application for personal bankruptcy or a ban on managing a business (L. 653-8). The time limit runs from the day the director had objective knowledge of the cessation.
What are the immediate consequences of the opening of insolvency proceedings?
The opening judgment suspends individual proceedings, freezes pre-opening liabilities and appoints the supervising judge, the creditors' representative and, where applicable, the administrator. Ongoing contracts are not terminated automatically; the administrator or the liquidator chooses whether to continue or to renounce them (Article L. 622-13 of the French Commercial Code). Clauses providing for automatic termination on the opening of proceedings are deemed unwritten. Publication in the BODACC starts the time limit for filing claims.
How long does the observation period last and what can the director do?
The observation period lasts six months and may be renewed for a further six months by decision of the court. During this period, the director stays in place in safeguard proceedings, and stays in place under the supervision or with the assistance of the administrator in reorganisation. The powers are set by the opening judgment. The director can no longer pay a pre-opening claim without the authorisation of the supervising judge. The director continues to run the business, but under supervision, and takes part in drawing up the draft plan.
How must a creditor file a claim, and within what time limit?
Article L. 622-24 of the French Commercial Code requires every creditor whose claim arose before the opening judgment to send a filing to the creditors' representative. The ordinary time limit is two months from publication of the opening judgment in the BODACC. It is extended to four months for creditors who do not reside in metropolitan France (or, where the proceedings are opened overseas, in the relevant department or territorial collectivity). Creditors holding a registered security interest or a registered contract are notified personally, and the time limit runs from that notice. The filing counts as a claim in court and preserves security interests.
What should I do if the creditors' representative challenges my claim?
The creditors' representative checks each claim filed. If it proposes a partial or total rejection, it informs the creditor, who has a period in which to reply. If there is no reply or if the parties disagree, the matter is brought before the supervising judge, who rules by order. That order may be appealed to the court of appeal. The defence requires solid documents: invoices, purchase orders, delivery notes, emails confirming the service, signed payment schedules. A challenge may result in partial admission rather than total rejection.
What is a continuation plan and on what conditions is it granted?
The continuation plan is adopted by judgment at the end of the observation period. It sets out how the business will continue, the rescheduling of liabilities and the debtor's commitments. Its maximum duration is ten years (fifteen years for farmers). The court assesses the viability of the project, the consistency of the forecasts and the commitment of the directors. For companies subject to classes of affected parties (companies above the thresholds), a favourable vote of the classes is required. The plan makes it possible to avoid liquidation and preserve the business.
What is the difference between a continuation plan and a sale plan?
The continuation plan keeps the debtor at the head of the business after restructuring. The sale plan transfers all or part of the business to a buyer selected by the court. The sale may be total or partial (a branch of activity). The sale price is applied to pay creditors according to their ranking. Contracts necessary to continue the business (lease, employment contracts, commercial contracts) may be transferred to the buyer by decision of the court. A sale in reorganisation is governed by Articles L. 631-13 et seq.
When is judicial liquidation ordered and how does it work?
Liquidation is opened when the debtor is in cessation of payments and its reorganisation is manifestly impossible (Article L. 640-1 of the French Commercial Code). The court appoints a liquidator, who takes full powers, the debtor being divested of its assets (Article L. 641-9). The liquidator verifies the claims, sells the assets (as a whole or separately) and pays creditors according to their ranking. The proceedings may be closed for insufficiency of assets or for extinction of liabilities. Closure for insufficiency opens, where appropriate, an examination of the director's liability.
How are assets sold in judicial liquidation?
The liquidator realises the assets in several ways: sale of the business as a whole, separate sale of a branch of activity, or sale of individual assets (equipment, stock, real estate, receivables). Sale as a whole is preferred if it preserves jobs and pays creditors better. Real estate is sold at public auction or by private agreement with the authorisation of the supervising judge. Intellectual assets (trademarks, patents) may be sold separately. The proceeds are applied to pay claims according to the ranking of privileges and security interests.
Can proceedings be converted from safeguard to reorganisation, or from reorganisation to liquidation?
Yes. Safeguard may be converted into reorganisation if cessation of payments occurs during the observation period. Reorganisation may be converted into liquidation if the situation deteriorates and reorganisation becomes manifestly impossible. Conversion does not require waiting for the end of the observation period: the court rules as soon as the conditions are met, on application by the debtor, the public prosecutor, the creditors' representative or of its own motion. This possibility of conversion makes it possible to adapt the proceedings to how the situation actually develops.
What is an action for liability for shortfall in assets and who can bring it?
Article L. 651-2 of the French Commercial Code allows the court, where the judicial liquidation of a legal entity reveals a shortfall in assets, to place all or part of that shortfall on the director or directors who committed a contributory management fault. Mere negligence has been excluded since the law of 9 December 2016. The action may be brought by the liquidator or the public prosecutor or, where the liquidator fails to act after a formal notice, by the majority of the creditors appointed as supervisors. It is time-barred after three years from the liquidation judgment. The amount is assessed at the court's sole discretion (Cass. com., 9 May 2018, No. 16-26.684).
What criteria justify personal bankruptcy of a director?
Personal bankruptcy, known as faillite personnelle (Articles L. 653-1 et seq. of the French Commercial Code), penalises serious breaches: abusively continuing a loss-making business, diverting or concealing all or part of the assets, keeping fictitious or fraudulent accounts, failing to keep accounts, or disposing of company assets as if they were personal property. It entails a ban on directing, managing, administering or controlling any commercial or craft business and any legal entity, for a maximum of fifteen years. Entry in the criminal record is mandatory. The penalty may be limited to a simple ban on managing a business.
What is fraudulent bankruptcy and what penalties apply?
Fraudulent bankruptcy (banqueroute, Article L. 654-1 of the French Commercial Code) is a standalone offence, which requires the opening of reorganisation or liquidation proceedings and the commission of listed acts: purchases for resale below market price, preferential payments, diversion or concealment of assets, fraudulent increase of liabilities, fictitious or missing accounts. The penalties are five years' imprisonment and a fine of €75,000, raised to seven years and €100,000 where the offender is a director of an investment services provider (Article L. 654-4). Additional penalties of a ban on managing a business and ineligibility may be imposed.
What happens to the commercial lease in insolvency proceedings?
The commercial lease is an ongoing contract subject to Article L. 622-13 of the French Commercial Code. The administrator (in safeguard and reorganisation) or the liquidator (in liquidation) has an option: to require the lease to continue or to renounce it. Rent that fell due before the opening judgment is declared as a liability. Later rent consists of post-judgment claims (Article L. 622-17), to be paid when due in order to preserve the lease. The landlord cannot take any eviction measure based on a payment default prior to the judgment during the observation period. The lease may be assigned to the buyer under a sale plan.
How are employees protected in insolvency proceedings?
Employees benefit from threefold protection. Unpaid wages and indemnities are guaranteed by the AGS, the employees' wage-claims guarantee scheme (Association pour la gestion du régime de Garantie des créances des Salariés), within the statutory ceilings. Employees are represented by an employee representative appointed from the opening, who attends hearings and checks the drawing up of the statement of wage claims. Preservation of employment is given priority in sale plans, the court having to choose the offer that best safeguards jobs. Economic dismissal during the proceedings follows specific authorisation rules.
Is the director's guarantor released by the opening of reorganisation?
No. The opening of insolvency proceedings does not release the guarantor. However, a guarantor who is an individual benefits from the provisional stay of proceedings during the observation period and the performance of the safeguard or reorganisation plan. The guarantor may raise all defences inherent in the debt: extinction, limitation, challenge. Where a claim is to be filed, the guarantor is released if the creditor fails to file within the time limit. A director who has stood as guarantor must anticipate this risk from the opening by organising a personal defence.
Does the stay of individual proceedings apply to all actions?
The opening judgment prohibits or suspends any legal action seeking payment of a sum of money or termination of a contract for non-payment, as well as any enforcement procedure against the debtor's assets (Article L. 622-21 of the French Commercial Code). Proceedings based on other grounds (liability action, action to reclaim goods, action for nullity) remain possible. Creditors holding a post-judgment claim may act individually when it falls due. Actions by unsecured creditors are postponed until closure, unless the claim is admitted.
Can a director start a new business after judicial liquidation?
Yes, unless the court has imposed a ban on managing a business or personal bankruptcy. A director who has not been subject to such a penalty may create or run a new company. Closure for insufficiency of assets does not automatically entail a ban on managing a business. However, the history of insolvency proceedings can affect access to credit, relations with suppliers and the confidence of future partners. The firm systematically advises the director on the conditions for resuming business, the separation of personal and business assets and the documentation of management decisions.
Sources and related pages
Official texts and related pages
The sources for this page and the firm's related areas of practice.
Further reading
Page updated on 11 June 2026.
Let's discuss your situation, without delay.
Cessation of payments to declare, a claim to save or a director to defend: send the cash-flow statement or the opening judgment. In this field every day counts — reply within 24 business hours.
The latest news.
What our clients say
Best real estate law and business law lawyer in Paris. A humane and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN
Translated from French
Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law on fraudulent non-disclosure in property sales. It reassures me about an action for annulment that I am considering after buying a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterised by spreading through-cracks and damp stains, not reported by the estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or at his instigation, under a coat of paint and by polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And the said estate agent drafted the preliminary contract, which of course contains no information about any of these defects. Just to add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain that the estate agent thought I would not be able to discover the deception and above all to establish the fraudulent intent, still less to bring legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the procedure... That is why I am opting for the criminal route, insofar as the intentional concealment of the defects by the seller and then by the estate agent amounts to the fraudulent manoeuvres of art. 313-1 of
Translated from French
Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.
Translated from French
I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!
Translated from French
Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.
Translated from French
Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.
Translated from French
As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!
Translated from French
I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz
Translated from French
Very satisfied! I would like to thank Maître Esther Cornu here, who managed to resolve a very complicated dispute in a divorce and family law matter...Thanks to Maître Cornu, a judgment was handed down in my favour even though it was far from a foregone conclusion...So I recommend this law firm
Translated from French
A precise and concrete analysis and an immediate response. Excellent.
Translated from French
I highly recommend this lawyer for his professionalism, honesty, and transparency. He helped me successfully and guided me through the process with great care and expertise. What I particularly appreciated was his honest approach and the fact that he recommended practical, cost-effective options instead of immediately pushing for the most expensive solution. He genuinely focused on finding the right approach for my situation. I’m very grateful for his support and would definitely recommend him to anyone looking for a trustworthy and professional lawyer in France.
Thank you for this detailed, precise help, with a proposal at the end on whether or not to continue (very quick response as well)
Translated from French
Very good advice given by Maître Cornu during our meeting on 16 October.
Translated from French
Very professional and responsive service. The lawyer quickly and carefully checked the validity of my wife’s residence permit in light of a specific legal regime. His work gave us clarity, whereas the usual administrative procedures were long and ambiguous. I appreciated his efficiency and professionalism, and I recommend his services.
Translated from French
I would like to warmly thank Maître Esther Cornu for her professionalism, her availability and the quality of her support. In a case of particular importance for my professional future, she showed great responsiveness, rigour and a gift for explaining things, taking the time to answer my questions precisely and to explain the various legal steps to me. I particularly appreciate the clarity of her analyses, her seriousness and her commitment in following up my case. Many thanks to Maître Esther Cornu for listening and for her support. I highly recommend!
Translated from French
I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Mr Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions about my case instantly. It has become so rare these days to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive and attentive, even when it is simply a matter of answering questions. His answers are clear, precise and reassuring. You can tell that he takes the time to understand the situation and to provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent ratings on Google, it is above all this availability and this seriousness that make the difference. Many thanks to Mr Reda Cohen for his professionalism and his responsiveness. I highly recommend!
Translated from French
A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.
Translated from French
Good experience. And good work, thank you for everything.
Translated from French
Saw Hassan on the TV news
Translated from French
very clear article
Translated from French
Loading…
Your cookies
We use cookies to measure the effectiveness of our campaigns and improve the site. You can change your choice at any time.
