Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Needs a French VAT Number While You Live Abroad: Registration, Returns, Refunds and Audits

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, and your French company has just been registered. The Kbis — the official certificate of existence issued by the greffe, the clerk’s office of the commercial court — has arrived, the corporate bank account is open, and the first invoices are about to go out. One question then decides whether your first months in France run smoothly or end in penalties: does your company need a French value added tax number, and if so, how do you obtain it and live with it while managing everything from abroad? This article answers that question from start to finish. It explains which sales and services push a foreign-owned French company into the French VAT system, how a founder who never sets foot in France gets the VAT identification number through the French registration chain, how returns, payments, deductions and refunds work in practice from another country, and what happens when the French tax administration audits your VAT and how you defend yourself at a distance. Every acronym is explained, every rule is tied to the statute or court decision that states it, and the practical path is described step by step so that a business reader with no French legal training can act with precision.

I. Does your French company need a French VAT number when you live abroad?

A. Which sales and services force a foreign-owned French company into French VAT?

French VAT applies to a wide range of business transactions, and the starting point is deliberately broad. Article 256 of the French General Tax Code (Code général des impôts, abbreviated CGI) provides that “Sont soumises à la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée les livraisons de biens et les prestations de services effectuées à titre onéreux par un assujetti agissant en tant que tel.” (Article 256 CGI, Légifrance). In plain English, supplies of goods and services made for consideration by a taxable person acting as such fall within French VAT. A taxable person (assujetti) is, in substance, anyone who independently carries out an economic activity, whatever its purpose or result. Your French société par actions simplifiée (SAS, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or société à responsabilité limitée (SARL, the limited liability company with stricter statutory rules) is therefore a taxable person from the day it starts trading, even if its sole shareholder and president live abroad.

The fact that the company is French-registered matters enormously. A company entered on the French Trade and Companies Register (Registre du commerce et des sociétés, abbreviated RCS) and operating from a French registered office is established in France for VAT purposes. Its domestic sales of goods, its services performed in France, and its purchases follow the standard French VAT rules: it charges French VAT on its taxable output, recovers French VAT on its business inputs under the deduction rules, and reports the balance to the French tax office. The company that merely holds a French registration but makes no taxable transactions yet still needs to understand when the obligation bites, because the line between preparation and taxable operation is crossed earlier than many foreign founders expect. Receiving the Kbis does not by itself create VAT liability, but the first domestic invoice issued, the first French customer billed, or the first taxable service rendered from the French structure does.

Cross-border situations add a second layer that foreign shareholders frequently misunderstand. Article 283 of the same code states the default rule that “La taxe sur la valeur ajoutée doit être acquittée par les personnes qui réalisent les opérations imposables” (Article 283 CGI, Légifrance). VAT is in principle paid by the person who carries out the taxable transaction. But the same article immediately organises the reverse-charge mechanism for supplies covered by Article 259 A made by a supplier established outside France: in that case, “la taxe est acquittée par l’acquéreur, le destinataire ou le preneur qui agit en tant qu’assujetti et qui dispose d’un numéro d’identification à la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée en France.” (Article 283 CGI, reverse charge, Légifrance). In other words, when a supplier established outside France sells to a French taxable customer that holds a French VAT identification number, the French customer accounts for the VAT, not the foreign supplier. This matters in both directions for your group: your French subsidiary will apply the reverse charge when it buys services from its foreign parent, and your foreign parent will expect the French subsidiary to hold a valid French VAT number so that intra-group flows are treated correctly.

Three common patterns illustrate where foreign founders go wrong. First, the founder who invoices French customers from the foreign parent company, believing the French subsidiary can remain dormant and outside VAT, discovers that the French customers demand a French VAT number on invoices and that the administration treats the activity as carried out in France. Second, the e-commerce founder who ships goods from a warehouse outside France to French consumers assumes that distance-selling thresholds of the past still shelter small volumes; since the reform of intra-Community distance sales, most business-to-consumer supplies of goods dispatched to France are taxable in France and require French VAT identification, often through the One-Stop Shop or a direct French registration. Third, the services founder — consulting, software, design, marketing — who performs work remotely for French clients from abroad assumes no French presence means no French VAT; yet once the French subsidiary exists and participates in the supply, or once the services fall within the French territoriality rules, French VAT registration becomes unavoidable. The prudent reflex is therefore simple: as soon as your French company will bill, buy, import or move goods or services connected with France, plan for a French VAT number rather than discovering the need when the first large invoice is blocked by a customer whose accounting department refuses to pay an invoice without a valid VAT identifier.

One nuance deserves attention because it reassures many small structures at the start. French law provides a small-business exemption (franchise en base) that relieves the smallest turnovers from charging VAT, but it is an exception with strict conditions and turnover ceilings, it varies by sector, and it removes the right to deduct input VAT at the same time. A foreign-owned company that expects rapid growth, that bears significant French input VAT on rent, fit-out works, equipment or professional fees, or that trades with VAT-registered business customers who recover VAT anyway, will usually prefer to be fully taxable from day one rather than locked into an exemption that prevents recovery. The choice is structural and should be made before the first return falls due, not after. If you are still hesitating between company forms at this stage, the companion guide on choosing between SAS, single-shareholder SASU, SARL and branch structures sets out the broader framework within which the VAT decision sits (choosing your French company form from abroad), and the general formation walkthrough covers the bank account, the Kbis certificate and the first administrative steps that precede the VAT analysis (setting up your company in France as a foreign founder).

B. How a founder living abroad gets the VAT number through the French registration chain

French VAT identification is not a standalone application filed in isolation. It flows from the creation and tax registration of the company, and a founder living abroad obtains it by following the same chain as a resident founder, with a few additional practical arrangements. The chain has three links: registration of the company with the business formalities office, tax identification by the French tax administration, and issuance of the intra-Community VAT number used on invoices and verified by customers across Europe.

The first link is the declaration of existence. Article 286 of the General Tax Code requires that every taxable person file a statement of commencement: “Dans les quinze jours du commencement de ses opérations, souscrire au bureau désigné par un arrêté une déclaration conforme au modèle fourni par l’administration.” (Article 286 CGI, Légifrance). The fifteen-day period runs from the start of operations, and the declaration is filed at the office designated by regulation. In today’s procedure, this declaration passes through the single online business counter (guichet unique des formalités des entreprises), operated under the responsibility of the National Institute of Industrial Property (Institut national de la propriété industrielle, abbreviated INPI), which forwards the file to the commercial court clerk (greffe) for RCS registration and to the tax administration for the tax file. The official business-creation guidance describes this single-entry filing and the documents each company form must attach (draft articles, proof of registered office, identity of directors, capital deposit certificate from the bank). A founder abroad completes the same online file, signs electronically or through a duly authorised representative (mandataire) holding a power of attorney, and receives the RCS registration and the Kbis in return. The practical difficulty for non-residents is rarely the law; it is logistics — obtaining an apostilled passport copy in time, aligning the bank’s capital deposit certificate with the articles, and designating a registered office address in France that accepts administrative mail while the founder is overseas.

The second link is tax identification. Once the company is on the RCS, the tax office of the place of the registered office (Service des impôts des entreprises, abbreviated SIE, the local corporate tax office) opens the company’s tax file and assigns the SIREN number’s tax attributes, including the VAT file when the company declares a taxable activity. No separate trip to France is needed: correspondence with the SIE runs by post and increasingly through the professional online account (espace professionnel) on the impots.gouv.fr portal, which the foreign director activates with the company’s SIREN number and the activation codes sent to the registered office. Founders who live abroad should therefore organise mail forwarding from the French registered office from day one, because activation letters, VAT option confirmations and return reminders arrive on paper at that address. Companies that opted for the small-business exemption at creation receive a different file marking; companies that declared taxable activity are placed under the normal or simplified VAT regime according to their expected turnover, and the SIE confirms the return frequency in writing. Keep that letter: it determines every deadline described in the second part of this article.

The third link is the intra-Community VAT number itself, the identifier printed on invoices in the form FR followed by two digits and the nine-digit SIREN number. It is derived automatically from the tax file once the company is identified for VAT, and customers and suppliers verify it through the European Commission’s VAT Information Exchange System (VIES). A foreign founder should test the number on VIES as soon as it is communicated, before issuing the first large invoice, because a customer whose accounts-payable system cannot validate the number will hold payment. Where the French company belongs to a group, the parent company’s finance team should circulate the new number internally on the day it is confirmed, update invoicing templates, and align the intra-group service agreements so that the reverse-charge wording appears correctly on cross-border invoices. The official guidance on the intra-Community VAT number explains its structure and verification (official guidance on the French VAT number), and the business-creation portal details the declaration-of-existence step that triggers the whole chain (declaring the start of activity, service-public.fr).

Two traps specific to non-resident founders deserve emphasis. The first is the dormant-company illusion: a company that holds a Kbis but files nothing because “it has not traded yet” accumulates late-filing exposure if its file marks it as a VAT taxable person. If the company genuinely has no operations, the correct move is to align the file marking with reality — through the guichet unique correction procedure — rather than silently filing nothing. The second trap is the representative gap: French administration letters are validly notified to the registered office even if the director lives in another time zone and reads them weeks later. Deadlines for returns, payments and objections run from notification or from the statutory due date regardless of when the director actually opened the envelope. A reliable mail-scanning arrangement with the domiciliation provider, combined with activated online accounts and calendar alerts set to Paris time, closes most of this gap at modest cost.

II. How do you live with French VAT from abroad without penalties?

A. How do you file French VAT returns, pay, deduct and claim a refund from abroad?

The core ongoing duty is the periodic VAT return. Article 287 of the General Tax Code states that “Tout redevable de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée identifié conformément aux dispositions combinées des articles 286 ter et 286 ter A est tenu de remettre au service des impôts dont il dépend et dans le délai fixé par arrêté une déclaration conforme au modèle prescrit par l’administration.” (Article 287 CGI, Légifrance). Every identified VAT payer must file the prescribed return with its tax office within the deadline set by regulation. The same article then distinguishes the two standard rhythms: “Les redevables soumis au régime réel normal d’imposition déposent mensuellement la déclaration visée au 1 indiquant, d’une part, le montant total des opérations réalisées, d’autre part, le détail des opérations taxables.” (Article 287 CGI, monthly returns, Légifrance). Companies under the normal real regime file monthly, reporting total turnover and the detail of taxable transactions, and the same article allows quarterly filing when the annual VAT payable stays below 4,000 euros, while smaller businesses under the simplified regime file one annual return with two half-yearly instalments. The SIE letter received at registration tells the new company which rhythm applies; the most common position for an active foreign-owned SAS with regular turnover is monthly filing (form CA3), with payment of the VAT due made at the same time by electronic transfer from the professional account.

Filing from abroad is entirely electronic and therefore fully compatible with non-resident management. Returns are filed and paid through the impots.gouv.fr professional account, which accepts SEPA transfers from the company’s French bank account. The director abroad should ensure three things: a French bank account technically enabled for professional tax debits, at least one authorised person able to validate the filing in the online account (the director personally or an accountant with an access mandate), and internal closing discipline that delivers the month’s sales and purchase data to the person filing within the first days of the following month. Many foreign groups centralise bookkeeping in the parent company’s systems and transmit a monthly cut-off pack to the French accountant; this works well provided the cut-off dates respect the French return calendar rather than the group’s home-country calendar, because French deadlines are computed under French rules and French public holidays shift practical filing capacity.

The deduction mechanism is where VAT turns from a cost into a neutral pass-through, and it rewards documentary discipline. Article 271 of the code opens with the principle: “La taxe sur la valeur ajoutée qui a grevé les éléments du prix d’une opération imposable est déductible de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée applicable à cette opération.” (Article 271 CGI, Légifrance). VAT that burdened the price components of a taxable transaction is deductible from the VAT applicable to that transaction. The same article fixes the timing: “La déduction de la taxe ayant grevé les biens et les services est opérée par imputation sur la taxe due par le redevable au titre du mois pendant lequel le droit à déduction a pris naissance.” (Article 271 CGI, deduction timing, Légifrance). Deduction is taken by offset against the VAT due for the month in which the right of deduction arose. In practice, the company offsets the VAT shown on compliant supplier invoices against the VAT it collected on its own sales, and pays only the difference — or carries forward a credit when input VAT exceeds output VAT, as commonly happens during the investment phase when a new subsidiary pays rent, works and equipment while its sales are still ramping up.

Compliant invoices are the key that unlocks deduction, and the statute is direct about the duty. Article 289 provides that “Tout assujetti est tenu de s’assurer qu’une facture est émise, par lui-même, ou en son nom et pour son compte, par son client ou par un tiers” (Article 289 CGI, Légifrance). Every taxable person must ensure that an invoice is issued, by itself or in its name and on its behalf. Supplier invoices must therefore show the supplier’s VAT number, the customer’s details, the price, the VAT rate and the VAT amount, in the format Article 289 prescribes. A founder abroad should impose an invoice-acceptance policy on the French team from the first month: no payment of a French supplier invoice above a defined threshold without the company’s VAT number shown as customer, without the supplier’s VAT number, and without the VAT amount stated separately. Missing or defective invoices do not merely create accounting noise; they expose the deduction to rejection on audit, and reconstruction months later from bank statements alone rarely satisfies the tax auditor.

When input VAT durably exceeds output VAT, the excess becomes a VAT credit (crédit de TVA) that the company may carry forward or claim as a refund under the conditions set by regulation. Start-up subsidiaries financed from abroad encounter this position frequently: the foreign parent injects funds through equity or shareholder loans (on which the companion guide on funding a French subsidiary from abroad explains the interest-rate and tax limits (funding your French subsidiary from abroad)), the subsidiary spends the funds on French taxable inputs, and a VAT credit accumulates. The refund claim follows the return that reveals the credit and must respect the regulatory time limits.

Timing discipline is strict because the two duties combine. Article 271 requires deduction to be taken by offset against the VAT due for the month in which the right of deduction arose (Article 271 CGI, deduction timing, Légifrance), while Article 287 requires every identified VAT payer to file the prescribed return with its tax office within the deadline set by regulation (Article 287 CGI, Légifrance). Deductible VAT shown on a supplier invoice must therefore be declared through the return for the correct month, starting from receipt of the invoice, and a credit that was never declared in its returns can be rejected when the tax office reviews the file. For a founder abroad, the lesson is operational: invoice reception must be logged centrally and without delay, because the clock for declaring deductible VAT runs from receipt of each invoice, and a credit discovered years later in a drawer is far harder to defend.

B. What happens when the tax office audits your VAT and how do you challenge from abroad?

VAT is the most audited French tax for young companies, because returns arrive monthly, anomalies are visible in data cross-checks, and refunds trigger systematic review. The audit typically begins with a notice, continues with a review of returns, invoices, contracts and bank movements, and ends with a proposed adjustment (proposition de rectification) that the company may accept or contest. A founder living abroad defends an audit the same way a resident founder does — through documents, deadlines and procedure — but must organise representation and responsiveness in advance, since audit correspondence arrives at the French registered office and short response windows run regardless of travel schedules. Appointing a French accountant and, when the stakes justify it, a French lawyer with a standing mandate to receive copies of audit correspondence ensures that no letter sits unread while the director is on another continent. The companion guide on URSSAF audits describes a comparable control-and-challenge rhythm on the social-security side and the same discipline of answering on time with complete files (facing a URSSAF audit while living abroad).

Penalties for late or missing VAT returns follow a graduated scale that the statute states precisely. Article 1728 of the General Tax Code provides that “Le défaut de production dans les délais prescrits d’une déclaration ou d’un acte comportant l’indication d’éléments à retenir pour l’assiette ou la liquidation de l’impôt entraîne l’application, sur le montant des droits mis à la charge du contribuable ou résultant de la déclaration ou de l’acte déposé tardivement, d’une majoration de : a. 10 % en l’absence de mise en demeure ou en cas de dépôt de la déclaration ou de l’acte dans les trente jours suivant la réception d’une mise en demeure d’avoir à le produire dans ce délai” (Article 1728 CGI, Légifrance). Failure to file within the prescribed deadlines triggers a surcharge on the duties assessed, starting at 10 percent where no formal notice was sent or where the return is filed within thirty days of receiving a formal notice to file. The same article raises the surcharge to 40 percent where the return is not filed within thirty days of the formal notice, and to 80 percent where an undisclosed business activity (activité occulte) is discovered. Each of these thresholds is therefore a deadline with a price: the formal notice (mise en demeure) opens a thirty-day window, and conduct after that window determines whether the surcharge stays at 10 percent or climbs to 40 percent. A founder abroad who discovers a missed return should file it immediately, before any formal notice arrives, because spontaneous filing keeps the case in the lowest bracket.

Late payment carries its own cost on top of the surcharge. Article 1727 states that “Toute créance de nature fiscale, dont l’établissement ou le recouvrement incombe aux administrations fiscales, qui n’a pas été acquittée dans le délai légal donne lieu au versement d’un intérêt de retard.” (Article 1727 CGI, Légifrance). Any tax debt within the remit of the tax administrations that is not paid within the legal deadline gives rise to late-payment interest. The interest accrues month by month on top of any surcharge, so a VAT balance left unpaid while the group debates internally whether the French assessment is correct grows continuously during the debate. The rational sequence is therefore to secure the position first — file the missing return, pay the principal shown, document the payment — and argue second through the remedies, rather than withholding payment as a negotiating tactic. Payment under reservation does not waive the right to challenge; it stops the interest meter.

The challenge path itself runs in two stages, and both are accessible from abroad. The first stage is the administrative claim (réclamation contentieuse) filed with the SIE, setting out the facts, the legal grounds and the relief requested, with the supporting invoices, contracts and returns attached. The claim suspends enforced collection only when combined with the applicable guarantee procedure, so the company should ask its adviser about the stay conditions at the same time as filing. The second stage, if the administration maintains the assessment in whole or in part, is the appeal to the administrative court (tribunal administratif) of the place of the tax office, filed within the statutory appeal period stated in the administration’s reply — a period the company must calendar on receipt, because it is a strict admissibility deadline (délai de recours) that the court enforces regardless of the director’s residence. Proceedings are written, representation by a lawyer is available without the director travelling to France, and hearings can be prepared by videoconference with the representative. Throughout, the standard of proof favours the company that kept complete records: numbered purchase and sales ledgers, contracts matching invoices, bank statements matching declared payments, and the VAT returns themselves. The Article 286 record-keeping duties quoted in the first part of this article are not decorative; on audit, the company that produces the statutory books and the underlying invoices within days settles most factual disputes before they harden into assessments.

Distance also affects evidence gathering in one specific way that founders should anticipate. Auditors routinely ask for the business rationale of intra-group flows: service agreements between the foreign parent and the French subsidiary, transfer-pricing documentation where applicable, proof that management services invoiced were actually rendered, and demonstration that the French company is not an empty shell. A subsidiary whose director lives abroad should keep board minutes, signed intra-group agreements, timesheets or deliverables for management fees, and proof of local substance — lease, payroll records for the first hires, supplier contracts — in a single audit-ready file. The corporate income-tax companion guide explains the wider tax position of the French company, including instalments and filings that auditors often review alongside VAT (French corporate tax for a company run from abroad). When the audit ends with a refund instead of an assessment — the common outcome for an investing subsidiary with a genuine VAT credit — the same file accelerates payment, because the SIE releases refunds faster when the credit’s documentary trail is complete and consistent with the returns.

Conclusion

A French VAT number is not a bureaucratic ornament; it is the operating licence of a foreign-owned French company that bills, buys or moves value in France. The liability test starts with the broad sweep of Article 256, the reverse-charge rule of Article 283 allocates VAT correctly across borders, the fifteen-day declaration duty of Article 286 opens the file, the return rhythm of Article 287 structures every month or quarter, the deduction principle and timing of Article 271 make VAT neutral only for the company that declares on time, the invoicing duty of Article 289 supplies the proof, and the penalty and interest rules of Articles 1727 and 1728 price every delay. Above these statutes, the combined effect of Articles 271 and 287 is that deductible VAT declared late, outside the return for the month in which the right of deduction arose, is exposed to rejection on audit and can then neither be offset nor refunded (Article 271 CGI, Légifrance; Article 287 CGI, Légifrance). For a founder who lives abroad, the entire system is manageable without relocating: register through the single counter, activate the professional tax account, forward the registered-office mail, impose invoice discipline on the French team, file and pay electronically on the French calendar, log every supplier invoice on receipt, and mandate a French accountant and representative to receive audit correspondence. Done in this order, VAT becomes what it should be for a growing business in France — a neutral, documented, refundable flow — rather than the source of the first painful assessment.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9277 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
4 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

John Roberts
14 hours ago

Service très professionnel et réactif. L’avocat a rapidement et attentivement vérifié la validité du titre de séjour de mon épouse au regard d’un régime juridique particulier. Son travail nous a apporté des éclaircissements, alors que les démarches administratives habituelles étaient longues et ambiguës. J’ai apprécié son efficacité et son professionnalisme, et je recommande ses services.

Jean-François PAPA
6 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
1 week ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
2 weeks ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Alain Arsaut
12 hours ago

Vu Hassan au JT

Beaudrique Abao
17 hours ago
Krep Events Traiteur Breton
1 week ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
1 week ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
2 weeks ago
إبراهيم عيسى
2 weeks ago