Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

How to Close a French Company from Abroad: Dissolution, Liquidation or TUP?

Closing a French company while its founders, directors or parent company are abroad is a legal process, not a simple deletion of a Kbis. The Kbis is the official extract of the French Trade and Companies Register, or RCS (Registre du commerce et des sociétés). The company must first be dissolved, then either liquidated or transferred by a TUP, and finally removed from the French registers. The right route depends on the company form, the identity of the shareholder, the solvency of the business and the existence of creditors, employees, tax liabilities or unresolved contracts.

This guide is for foreign founders, foreign shareholders and overseas groups that want to close a solvent French subsidiary, SAS, SARL, EURL or SASU from outside France. It does not address immigration or a private individual’s move to France, and it does not concern real-estate purchases. A voluntary closure is possible only when the company can pay its debts. If the company has stopped making payments, a judicial insolvency procedure may be required. The practical sequence is therefore decisive: choose the procedure, approve the decision, appoint the right representative, complete the tax and social filings, deal with creditors, and obtain the final radiation from the RNE, the National Register of Enterprises.

I. How do you choose between French dissolution-liquidation and a TUP from abroad?

A. When is a voluntary dissolution and liquidation legally available?

The first question is not whether the shareholders are tired of maintaining the French entity. It is whether the entity is solvent. Voluntary dissolution and liquidation are designed for a company that can settle its liabilities, including known debts, disputed debts that should reasonably be provisioned, employee entitlements, taxes, social contributions, lease obligations and the costs of the closure itself. If assets are insufficient to pay debts as they fall due, the directors must not use an amicable procedure to conceal insolvency. The company should obtain a current balance-sheet view, a cash forecast, a list of unpaid invoices and a statement of tax and social accounts before any shareholder vote.

Article 1844-7 of the French Civil Code identifies the early dissolution decided by the shareholders as one event that can end a company. The official text refers to dissolution “décidée par les associés” (decided by the shareholders). That decision is not the same as the final disappearance of the legal person. Under article 1844-8 of the Civil Code, dissolution generally causes liquidation, and the company’s legal personality survives for the needs of the liquidation until the closure is published. The distinction matters for a foreign founder: after the vote, the company still exists, but its purpose is now to collect, sell, pay, account and close.

The principal exception is a judicial procedure triggered by financial distress. A company in cessation des paiements, meaning that it cannot meet due and payable liabilities with available assets, should be assessed for sauvegarde, redressement judiciaire or liquidation judiciaire rather than an orderly shareholder liquidation. The official Service-Public procedure for closing a company distinguishes an amicable closure from a company that is unable to pay its debts. A foreign board or parent company should obtain French legal and accounting advice before signing a dissolution resolution if there is any doubt about solvency.

The company form affects the internal approval. For an SAS, the statutes normally determine the majority and quorum rules, and the shareholders must follow those rules precisely. For an SARL, the applicable shareholder majority depends on the date and circumstances of the company and the wording of its articles. For an EURL or SASU, the sole shareholder records the decision in writing. The formal record should identify the date, the reason for the dissolution, the appointment and powers of the liquidator, the address for correspondence, the duration of the liquidation and the authority granted for the French filings. A foreign shareholder can sign through a qualified electronic process or give a properly documented mandate to a local representative, subject to the Guichet unique requirements.

Do not confuse a registered-office change with a closure. A company can be managed from abroad and still remain registered in France. Closure requires a decision that ends the company, whereas remote management merely changes who gives instructions and where those instructions originate. A foreign founder who leaves France, sells a house in France or moves the group’s headquarters abroad has not, by that fact alone, closed the French subsidiary. The French entity remains responsible for its RCS and RNE entries, tax returns, employee obligations, contracts and debts until the proper closure is completed.

Once the dissolution is approved, the company enters liquidation unless a TUP or another statutory exception applies. Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code states that dissolution “entraîne sa liquidation” (leads to its liquidation), except in the cases provided by law. The provision also states that the dissolution has no effect against third parties until it is published, and that the legal personality remains for the needs of the liquidation until publication of the closure. The company name must then show the words “société en liquidation” in the relevant documents and correspondence.

The liquidator is not a ceremonial contact. Article L237-24 of the Commercial Code gives the liquidator the power to represent the company, realise its assets and pay creditors. The official provision says that the liquidator is “habilité à payer les créanciers et répartir le solde disponible” (authorised to pay creditors and distribute the available balance). The shareholder resolution should therefore appoint someone who can obtain bank information, instruct accountants, sign with the tax office, terminate contracts, handle employee matters and respond to creditors. A liquidator living abroad may be possible, but a French professional representative is often more practical when there are filings, notices or disputes to manage in France.

The appointment and the dissolution must be made visible to third parties. Article R237-2 of the Commercial Code requires publication of the liquidator’s appointment, whatever the form of the act, within one month in a publication authorised to carry legal notices. The notice identifies the company, its form, its capital, its registered office, the reason for the liquidation, the liquidator’s identity and address, the limits of the liquidator’s powers, the correspondence address and the court registry. The exact requirements for the liquidation notice should be checked against the company’s current details before publication.

A foreign group should also decide whether its French legal entity has a continuing commercial purpose during the wind-down. It may need to finish an order, collect a receivable, sell stock, transfer intellectual property, terminate a lease or defend a claim. The liquidator’s mandate should be broad enough to complete those tasks but controlled enough to preserve evidence and avoid new trading that is inconsistent with liquidation. The company should not distribute cash to shareholders merely because the parent wishes to repatriate funds. Creditors, employees and the French tax and social authorities must be dealt with first.

For an overview of the relationship between the procedural stages and the legal-service route, a foreign shareholder can also review the firm’s French company dissolution and liquidation legal support page. The page does not replace the company-specific review of its articles, accounting, employment situation and liabilities, but it helps distinguish a normal liquidation from an urgent insolvency matter.

B. When can a foreign parent use a TUP instead of a liquidation?

A TUP is a transmission universelle du patrimoine, meaning a universal transfer of the company’s assets and liabilities. It is not a general shortcut available to every foreign founder. It is principally available when the sole shareholder is a legal person, such as a foreign company. It is not the ordinary route where the sole shareholder is an individual. The foreign parent takes over the dissolved company’s universal patrimony, subject to the statutory creditor-opposition period and the rules applicable to the transaction.

Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code provides the legal mechanism. Its official wording states: “En cas de dissolution, celle-ci entraîne la transmission universelle du patrimoine de la société à l’associé unique, sans qu’il y ait lieu à liquidation.” In English, dissolution transfers the company’s entire patrimony to the sole shareholder without a liquidation. The same article states that creditors may oppose the dissolution within thirty days from its publication, and that the transfer and disappearance of the legal person occur only after the opposition period has expired or after opposition has been resolved. Those safeguards are essential when the sole shareholder is a foreign parent.

Since 1 October 2024, a dissolution resulting in a TUP must also be published in the BODACC, the Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, in addition to the legal notice publication. The official Service-Public update on TUP notices explains that a legal-person sole shareholder must use the TUP mechanism and that the BODACC publication is part of the creditor-protection framework. The company should not treat a notice in a local legal newspaper as the whole procedure. The evidence of publication, the date on which the opposition period ends and the registry filings must be retained together.

The TUP transfers both rights and obligations. It can therefore pass contracts, receivables, bank balances, intellectual property, tax positions, litigation, guarantees and liabilities to the foreign parent. The foreign parent should perform a due-diligence review before deciding: outstanding customer claims, supplier disputes, employment claims, tax audits, social contributions, shareholder loans, personal guarantees and data-retention obligations do not disappear because the French subsidiary no longer has a separate legal personality.

The Cour de cassation has confirmed the practical reach of a universal transfer. In Cass. 3e civ., 9 April 2014, no. 13-11.640, the court dealt with the effect of a TUP on a lease and referred to the sole shareholder being substituted for the dissolved company “dans tous les biens, droits et obligations” (in all its assets, rights and obligations). A foreign parent should therefore inventory the contracts that will pass automatically and the contracts whose terms, licences, regulatory approvals or counterparties require a separate practical action.

Creditor opposition is not a formality that can be neutralised by rushing the filing. In Cass. com., 25 May 2022, no. 19-24.470, the Cour de cassation held that a creditor can challenge the dissolution without liquidation when the beneficiary has implemented a process that could “priver d’efficacité la faculté d’opposition ouverte par l’article 1844-5” (deprive the opposition right of its effectiveness). The parent should keep the publication dates, respond to any opposition, and avoid transfers or distributions intended to make the creditor’s statutory protection useless.

The same warning appears in Cass. com., 11 September 2012, no. 11-11.141, concerning a TUP that was alleged to have been used to defeat collective creditor proceedings. A TUP is appropriate for a solvent, properly documented group simplification. It is not a device for moving assets out of a French company after it has become unable to pay its creditors. If the company is in financial distress, the directors should urgently examine the insolvency rules and the risk of personal liability.

There is also an important corporate distinction between an EURL or SASU owned by an individual and one owned by a legal person. The individual shareholder generally does not benefit from the universal transfer without liquidation. Where the sole shareholder is a foreign company, a TUP may apply; where the sole shareholder is a person, an ordinary liquidation is normally required. The precise status of the shareholder at the date of the dissolution must be established from the corporate register and the ownership documents, not assumed from the trading name or from the fact that the founder lives abroad.

Before choosing a TUP, the parent should obtain a written schedule of assets and liabilities, confirm that the French company is not in cessation des paiements, identify all known creditors, and determine the tax consequences in both France and the parent company’s jurisdiction. A foreign parent may need a corporate approval, a certified extract of its own register, a translation, proof of authority of its signatory and documents showing its legal-person status. The Guichet unique or the appointed mandataire may request specific evidence. A technically valid TUP can still create a poor commercial result if the parent cannot prove its authority or respond to a French creditor within the opposition period.

II. What are the remote filing, tax and creditor steps before a French company is finally closed?

A. How can a foreign shareholder complete the dissolution and liquidation remotely?

Since 1 January 2023, French company cessation formalities are submitted through the Guichet unique operated by the INPI, the Institut national de la propriété industrielle. The official Service-Public page on creation, modification and cessation formalities confirms that foreign companies and foreign representatives can use the unified channel, subject to the supporting documents and authority evidence. A foreign founder should plan the remote process as a controlled file rather than as a single online form.

Step one is the corporate decision. Prepare the shareholder resolution or sole-shareholder decision, the company’s current statutes, the identity and address of the liquidator, the liquidator’s acceptance, and the address at which notices can be received. The resolution should state that the company is solvent, unless a different legal procedure is being considered, and should give the liquidator authority to complete the dissolution, liquidation, tax, social and registry tasks. If the shareholder is a foreign company, prepare the parent company’s current registry extract, proof of its legal existence and a board or shareholder authorisation for the TUP decision. If documents are not in French, obtain the translation or certification required for the filing rather than uploading an informal translation.

Step two is the notice and the Guichet unique filing. Publish the dissolution and liquidator notice in an authorised legal-notice publication, then submit the cessation or dissolution formalities through the INPI e-procedures portal. The INPI’s closure guide explains that dissolution and radiation are separate stages. The first stage records the decision to dissolve. The second stage records the completed liquidation and requests radiation. A company normally cannot be radiated before the dissolution stage has been properly recorded, except in specific statutory operations such as a merger or demerger.

The remote signatory must use the accepted identity and signature route. The INPI explains that FranceConnect+ is recommended where available; an INPI Connect account may require a qualified advanced electronic signature and a qualified certificate. The exact interface can change, so the applicant should follow the current portal instructions on the day of filing. If a mandataire files on behalf of the foreign shareholder, the mandate or delegation should be uploaded with the filing. The foreign director should keep the submission receipt, the payment evidence, every attachment and any registry request for correction.

The one-month period is operationally important. The act appointing the liquidator is subject to publication within one month under article R237-2 of the Commercial Code. The official list of notice information includes the company name, form, capital, registered office, cause of the liquidation and the liquidator’s contact details. For a foreign liquidator, the correspondence address must be genuinely usable. A mailbox that no one monitors can cause missed creditor opposition, tax letters or court documents.

Step three is the liquidation work itself. The liquidator should obtain bank statements, accounting ledgers, customer and supplier ageing, payroll records, tax account statements, social account statements, insurance policies, leases, licences, software subscriptions and corporate registers. The liquidator should record the date on which operations ceased, collect receivables, sell or transfer assets at defensible values, cancel or assign contracts, pay creditors in the proper order, and preserve evidence for later tax or litigation questions. A foreign parent should not instruct the French bank to close the account before final payments, tax refunds, social adjustments and registry costs have cleared.

Employees require a separate review. Closing the company may require redundancies, transfer analysis, settlement of wages and paid leave, final payroll declarations and documentary proof of termination. The DSN, or déclaration sociale nominative, is the French monthly social data return used for employees. Social contributions are generally administered through URSSAF, the Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales. A company without employees can still have outstanding URSSAF charges, director contributions or a request for a social regularity certificate. The liquidator should obtain a written position rather than infer that a zero payroll means a zero social liability.

Step four is the final accounts and closure decision. Article L237-23 of the Commercial Code requires the liquidator to call the shareholders to approve the final accounts within six months of appointment; a court can extend the period in appropriate circumstances. The official text of article L237-23 sets out that six-month timetable and the possibility of judicial intervention if the liquidation is not completed. At the end, article L237-9 requires the shareholders to examine the final accounts, grant discharge to the liquidator and record the closure. The resolution should state whether there is a liquidation surplus or a loss and what is to be distributed or borne.

Step five is the radiation filing. The final accounts and the closure decision must be deposited with the competent commercial court registry or the electronic register route. Article R237-7 of the Commercial Code requires supporting evidence that can include the decision approving the final accounts, a social regularity certificate under the Social Security Code and a tax certificate. The current article R237-7 should be checked because the documents and electronic filing rules have evolved. The closure notice must then be published under article R237-8, whose official wording addresses publication of the liquidation closure.

After publication of the closure, the liquidator files for radiation from the RNE and the RCS. Article R123-265 of the Commercial Code provides a one-month filing period after publication of the closure for the liquidator. The official RNE radiation rule also addresses the TUP route, under which the sole shareholder makes the relevant declaration after the transfer has taken effect. The updated Kbis or register extract should be downloaded after the registry processes the filing. A foreign parent should preserve both the pre-closure and post-radiation extracts.

The final result is not established merely by receiving a portal acknowledgement. Check that the RNE record, the RCS extract, the legal notices, the tax account and the bank closure all tell the same story. If the INPI requests a correction, respond through the portal and keep the request and answer. If the registration was originally made through an old registry route, or if an earlier change was never recorded, the radiation filing may be rejected until the historic inconsistency is corrected. A foreign founder should budget time for that possibility.

B. Which tax, social-security and creditor issues must be cleared before radiation?

Tax closure is a set of filings, not a single tax certificate. A company subject to French corporate income tax, or IS (impôt sur les sociétés), must establish the final taxable result under the rules applicable to its regime. Article 201 of the French General Tax Code addresses cessation declarations and the final result. For a company under a real tax regime, the official tax guidance generally refers to a final result declaration within sixty days after cessation. The official article 201 text should be read together with the current instructions from the French tax administration, because the date and form depend on the company’s tax regime and filing calendar.

The French tax administration’s current practical timetable is more useful for the closing checklist. Its page on deadlines for professional taxpayers identifies the final corporate result declaration, the final VAT return and other declarations. For VAT, a CA3 return is generally filed within thirty days for the relevant cessation event, while a CA12 return generally has a sixty-day period. CA3 and CA12 are French VAT return forms; the correct form depends on the company’s VAT regime. The company must also determine whether it has collected VAT, claimed input VAT, imported goods, made intra-European transactions or retained stock requiring an adjustment.

CFE, or cotisation foncière des entreprises, is the local business property contribution. The tax administration explains that CFE can be assessed by reference to the situation on 1 January, while a business that ceases during the year may be able to request a reduction for the months after cessation. The request should be made through the secure professional tax account and supported by the cessation date. CVAE, or cotisation sur la valeur ajoutée des entreprises, may also need to be reviewed depending on turnover and the applicable year. A foreign parent should not assume that a closed bank account or a zero invoice period automatically cancels a CFE assessment.

Other tax points can include payroll withholding, tax on salaries, apprenticeship or training contributions, customs accounts, the taxation of a liquidation surplus and withholding on payments to a foreign shareholder. The accounting treatment of a liquidation bonus may differ from the treatment of repayment of paid-in capital. The parent company’s jurisdiction may also impose reporting or withholding rules. The French liquidator should ask the accountant and the tax adviser to reconcile the final accounts with the tax filings and to obtain written evidence of the company’s position.

Social obligations must be closed with the same care. The company should submit its final DSN where employees were employed, pay salary and leave balances, request the relevant URSSAF statement and address any director social-security contributions. A director’s social status depends on the company form and the director’s role; it should not be inferred solely from residence abroad. A social regularity certificate may be needed for the final radiation file. If the company has no current employees but previously employed people, preserve payroll records and termination documents for the applicable retention period.

Creditors are not limited to suppliers who have sent invoices. The list should include landlords, banks, payment providers, customers with refund claims, employees, former employees, insurers, public authorities, URSSAF, the French tax administration, customs, software providers, licensors, professional advisers and litigants. The liquidator should identify contingent liabilities and create a written reserve for disputed matters. If a creditor claims after the final distribution, the question is not automatically solved by the Kbis radiation. The former legal personality can disappear while the obligations have moved to another person or while a responsible party remains exposed under the applicable law.

The Cour de cassation has highlighted that post-liquidation creditor rights can remain material. In Cass. com., 8 October 2013, no. 12-24.825, the court examined the responsibility of a former shareholder toward social creditors after closure and the extent of an improperly received distribution. The lesson for a foreign shareholder is practical: do not distribute the apparent surplus until the accounts, creditor list and provisions are reliable, and keep evidence of the payments made by the liquidator.

The bank account should be closed last, not first. The liquidator may need it to receive customer payments, collect a tax refund, pay a late invoice, settle a social adjustment or reimburse a creditor. Keep the final statement, proof of account closure, proof of payment for the liquidation costs and evidence of any balance transferred to the foreign parent. If the bank refuses remote instructions, a local representative with a defined mandate may be needed. The mandate should address access to account information, payment approval and the authority to receive correspondence.

Corporate records and electronic evidence also matter. Retain the shareholder resolutions, notices, filing receipts, accounting journals, invoices, contracts, employment records, tax returns, VAT ledgers, bank statements, asset-sale documents, litigation files and correspondence with public authorities. Keep a copy of the final Kbis or RNE extract and the document proving the date of radiation. A foreign parent may need those records for an audit, a group reorganisation, a tax enquiry or a later dispute about a contract that passed through a TUP.

A TUP has its own creditor and tax workflow. The company publishes the dissolution, observes the opposition period, answers any opposition, and then records the transfer and disappearance. The parent should make sure that the BODACC and legal-notice dates are documented. Under article 1844-5, the transfer is not complete and the legal person does not disappear until the opposition period has ended or opposition has been dealt with. The statutory protection is especially important when the French company has customers or suppliers who are not part of the group and may not know that the foreign parent is taking over the liabilities.

For an ordinary liquidation, the practical sequence can be expressed as a remote closing checklist:

  1. Confirm solvency and identify any cessation-of-payments risk.
  2. Review the statutes, shareholder identity, director powers and required voting threshold.
  3. Choose ordinary liquidation or TUP, taking account of whether the sole shareholder is a legal person.
  4. Prepare the decision, liquidator acceptance, mandate and corporate supporting documents.
  5. Publish the dissolution notice and submit the first Guichet unique filing.
  6. Collect assets, pay or provision liabilities, close contracts, complete employee and social filings, and reconcile the tax accounts.
  7. Prepare final accounts, obtain the required social and tax evidence, and approve the closure.
  8. Publish the closure notice, submit the radiation filing, verify the RNE and RCS extracts, and only then close the remaining bank and operational accounts.

This sequence also helps a foreign company plan its timeline. A straightforward solvent liquidation can take several months because creditor payments, tax filings, final accounts and registry processing must occur in order. A TUP can be shorter where the company has no complex operations, but the creditor-opposition period and the BODACC process remain essential. An unresolved tax audit, employee dispute, lease, bank guarantee or litigation can make the practical timetable longer even when the legal decision is signed on day one.

Paris and Île-de-France do not create a separate closure law, but a company registered there may deal with a busy commercial registry, a local tax office, a landlord, employees and counsel in the same region. The competent registry and the company’s current registered office should be verified before filing. The place of the foreign founder’s residence does not move the French company’s registered office and does not remove the company’s French filing obligations.

Finally, the closure should be checked from the perspective of each person who may later rely on it. The foreign parent needs proof that the French entity has ended. A creditor needs to know whom to contact. The tax authority needs final declarations. Employees need their documents. A contracting party may need evidence of the successor in a TUP. A court may need the decision, the publication and the register history. A complete closing file answers each of those questions without relying on an informal email that the founder has left France.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Closing a French company from abroad can involve a dissolution vote, creditor protection, tax filings, social-security evidence and a final radiation. A lawyer can identify the right route before an incorrect TUP or an incomplete liquidation creates additional exposure.

We offer a 48-hour telephone consultation with a lawyer from the firm to review your French entity, its shareholder structure, its debts and the documents needed for a remote closure.

Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or use the contact form for the firm.

Conclusion

A foreign founder can usually close a solvent French company without travelling to France, but the process must follow the company’s legal form and financial reality. Ordinary dissolution leads to liquidation: a liquidator collects assets, pays or provisions creditors, completes the tax and social filings, approves the final accounts and requests radiation. A TUP may avoid a liquidation when a foreign legal person is the sole shareholder, but it transfers the entire patrimony and remains subject to creditor opposition, publication and documentary requirements.

The safest approach is to begin with a solvency review and a complete liability schedule, then prepare the shareholder decision and remote mandate, use the INPI Guichet unique, preserve every notice and filing receipt, and verify the final RNE and RCS position. The Kbis is the evidence of a completed registration status; it is not a substitute for paying creditors, filing final returns or retaining the company’s closing records.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Paul MALIK (powlo)
2 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
3 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
3 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
3 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
3 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
4 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
5 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Amir
5 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.