Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, attorney at the Paris Bar
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Buying Property in France: The Complete Step-by-Step Guide for Foreign Buyers

Buying Property in France: The Complete Step-by-Step Guide for Foreign Buyers

I. Before the Purchase: Planning, Financing and Due Diligence

A. Defining Your Project and Setting a Realistic Budget

Acquiring real estate in France as a non-resident—whether you are based in the United Kingdom, the United States or Australia—is a legally structured process governed by the French Civil Code. French property law offers a high degree of protection to the buyer, but also imposes obligations that differ in significant respects from those in common law jurisdictions. This guide is designed to walk you through each stage of the process, from the initial budget planning to the moment you receive the keys.

Under French law, a sale of immovable property is defined by Article 1582 of the Civil Code as a contract by which one party undertakes to deliver a thing, and the other to pay for it (« La vente est une convention par laquelle l’un s’oblige à livrer une chose, et l’autre à la payer »). The sale is perfected—and ownership transfers between the parties—as soon as there is agreement on the chose (the property) and the prix (the price), as set out in Article 1583: « Elle est parfaite entre les parties, et la propriété est acquise de droit à l’acheteur à l’égard du vendeur, dès qu’on est convenu de la chose et du prix, quoique la chose n’ait pas encore été livrée ni le prix payé. » This means that the binding contract exists between buyer and seller once they agree on what is being sold and for how much, even before the money changes hands or the deed is signed. This distinction between perfection (binding effect between the parties) and opposabilité (enforceability against third parties, which requires registration at the Land Registry) is fundamental to understanding the French conveyancing system.

Before embarking on a property search, the foreign buyer should establish a clear budget that accounts not only for the purchase price but also for frais de notaire (notary fees and transfer taxes), which typically range from 7% to 8% of the purchase price for existing properties, and from 2% to 3% for newly built properties subject to VAT. The buyer must also consider agency fees (honoraires d’agence), which in France are customarily borne by the seller in most residential transactions but may be included in the advertised price—this should be verified early. For British buyers, post-Brexit currency fluctuations, the absence of EU passporting for certain financial products, and the need to open a French bank account to set up direct debits for utilities and taxes should all be factored into the planning stage.

The overarching principle governing all pre-contractual dealings is that of good faith, enshrined in Article 1104 of the Civil Code: « Les contrats doivent être négociés, formés et exécutés de bonne foi. Cette disposition est d’ordre public. » Contracts must be negotiated, formed and performed in good faith; this provision is a matter of public policy. This means that both parties owe each other a duty of loyalty and transparency from the earliest stages of negotiation—a concept that differs from the more limited pre-contractual duties found in some common law systems. If a seller or agent deliberately withholds material information, the buyer may have grounds to seek annulment of the sale for dol (fraudulent misrepresentation).

At Kohen Avocats, our real estate department regularly assists international buyers in structuring their French property acquisitions from the very first planning stages, helping them navigate the interaction between French civil law rules and the tax or inheritance implications of their country of origin.

B. The Search, Visits and Due Diligence: What to Verify Before Signing

Once financing is arranged—or a realistic plan is in place—the buyer enters the property search phase. Whether working with an agent immobilier (estate agent) holding a carte professionnelle (professional licence) or dealing directly with the seller, the pre-purchase due diligence phase—known as vérifications préalables—is critical. Professional guidance is indispensable at this stage precisely because the information gathered here will determine the content of the legally binding preliminary contract.

French law imposes on the seller two principal obligations under Article 1603 of the Civil Code: « Il a deux obligations principales, celle de délivrer et celle de garantir la chose qu’il vend. » — the obligation to deliver the property and to warrant it against hidden defects and eviction. The obligation to deliver includes the duty to provide a property that conforms to the contractual description. Under Article 1602, the seller “est tenu d’expliquer clairement ce à quoi il s’oblige. Tout pacte obscur ou ambigu s’interprète contre le vendeur” — the seller must explain clearly what he undertakes to do; any obscure or ambiguous agreement is interpreted against the seller.

The Cour de cassation, France’s highest civil court, has affirmed the strength of this obligation in a significant ruling. In a decision of 21 December 2023 (Cass. 3e civ., 21 Dec. 2023, no. 22-21.518), the Court reversed a court of appeal ruling that had refused to characterise a defect in the délivrance conforme (conforming delivery) of a house whose attic—described in the deed simply as a grenier (attic)—was in fact structurally unusable. The third civil chamber held that the lower court should have examined whether the very mention of an attic in the sale deed implied that it must be usable, rather than dismissing the buyer’s claim. This decision underscores that a seller cannot escape liability by couching the property description in ambiguous or incomplete terms. For the foreign buyer who may not be physically present during all visits, relying on the accuracy of the property description takes on heightened importance.

The buyer should pay close attention to the dossier de diagnostic technique (technical diagnostic file), a mandatory bundle of surveys that the seller must provide before the sale. These include reports on lead paint (plomb), asbestos (amiante), termites (termites), natural and technological risks (état des risques naturels et technologiques), energy performance (diagnostic de performance énergétique or DPE), and, for properties in copropriété (co-ownership such as apartment buildings), an assessment of the building’s common areas. If the seller fails to provide these diagnostics, the statutory warranty against hidden defects cannot be excluded and the buyer may be entitled to a price reduction or, in serious cases, annulment of the sale.

One particular risk for foreign buyers—who may be less familiar with French utility infrastructure—concerns hidden servitudes. In a landmark ruling of 8 January 2026 (Cass. 3e civ., 8 Jan. 2026, no. 24-11.599), the Cour de cassation held that an administrative servitude (easement) consisting of a public water supply pipeline buried under the property was a hidden charge for which the sellers were liable, even though a copy of the building permit mentioning the pipeline in a footnote was attached to the sale deed. The Court confirmed that under Article 1638 of the Civil Code, a buyer may seek either rescission of the sale or a reduction in price where the property is burdened with a non-apparent servitude of such importance “qu’il y ait lieu de présumer que l’acquéreur n’aurait pas acheté s’il en avait été instruit” — that there is reason to presume the buyer would not have purchased had he been informed. For a foreign buyer considering a rural property with a river, a large garden or an old outbuilding, this is a pitfall that merits particular vigilance: the presence of drainage easements, utility conduits, or rights of way may not be obvious from a casual inspection.

II. The Legal Purchase Process: From Preliminary Agreement to Ownership

A. The Compromis de Vente: Structure, Key Clauses and the Buyer’s Cooling-Off Period

Once the buyer and seller have agreed on the essential terms—the property, the price and the principal conditions—the next step is the compromis de vente (also referred to as a promesse synallagmatique de vente), a bilateral preliminary agreement in which both parties commit to the sale, subject to the fulfilment of conditions precedent. Under Article 1589 of the Civil Code, “la promesse de vente vaut vente, lorsqu’il y a consentement réciproque des deux parties sur la chose et sur le prix” — a promise of sale is equivalent to a sale when both parties have mutually agreed on the property and the price.

The compromis is a legally binding document that crystallises the parties’ rights and obligations. It typically includes: a precise description of the property (désignation) with its cadastral (land registry) references and surface area (loi Carrez for apartments); the agreed price; the identity of the notaire (notary) who will handle the transaction; the estimated completion date; the dépôt de garantie (security deposit, usually 5% to 10% of the price, held in the notary’s escrow account); and, crucially, the conditions suspensives (conditions precedent). The most common condition is financing: the condition suspensive d’obtention d’un prêt (condition precedent of obtaining a loan) protects the buyer by making the sale contingent on securing a mortgage within a defined period. If the loan is refused under the terms specified in the compromis, the buyer may withdraw without penalty and recover any deposit paid.

However, the case law imposes strict requirements on the buyer who relies on this protection. In a ruling of 4 July 2024 (Cass. 3e civ., 4 Jul. 2024, no. 22-12.043), the Cour de cassation confirmed that the buyer must have submitted loan applications that conform to the characteristics stipulated in the compromis—including the maximum amount, repayment duration and interest rate. The Court examined whether a loan application at 2%, slightly below the maximum 2.2% specified in the promise, was still compliant, accepting it because the application stated that the rate was “susceptible d’amélioration” (subject to improvement). The practical lesson for a foreign buyer is clear: the precise financial terms set out in the financing condition must be scrupulously respected; a loan application for a different amount or duration may cause the condition to be deemed unsatisfied through the buyer’s own doing, exposing the deposit to forfeiture.

A decision of 30 March 2023 (Cass. 3e civ., 30 Mar. 2023, no. 22-10.797) further illustrates the importance of procedural compliance. The Court held that where a promesse unilatérale de vente (unilateral promise of sale, in which only the seller commits, leaving the buyer an option to purchase) stipulated that the buyer must provide proof of having filed loan applications within a set deadline, and that the condition would be deemed to have failed absent such proof, the failure to provide the required justification rendered the promise null. The Court also distinguished between the promesse unilatérale and the compromis: in the former, the beneficiary retains the right not to proceed with the purchase even if the conditions are met—an important structural difference that the foreign buyer should understand before choosing the type of preliminary agreement.

Another instructive decision, of 8 June 2023 (Cass. 3e civ., 8 Jun. 2023, no. 22-10.633), concerned a buyer who had received a bank refusal letter but failed to communicate it to the seller within the contractual deadline. The Court ruled that when the buyer—as the party who had the obligation to forward the refusal—had prevented the timely communication of the condition’s failure, the condition could be deemed fulfilled under the former Article 1178 of the Civil Code (the condition is deemed accomplished when the party who had an interest in its non-fulfilment has prevented its accomplishment). In other words, a buyer who obstructs the satisfaction of a condition cannot then rely on its non-fulfilment to escape the contract. The buyer must remain proactive and transparent throughout the condition period.

The compromis must also respect the mandatory cooling-off period established by Article L. 271-1 of the Construction and Housing Code. For any acquisition of residential property by a non-professional buyer, the law grants a délai de rétractation (retraction period) of ten days from the day after the first presentation of the registered letter notifying the act—or from its hand delivery by a professional intermediary. During these ten days, the buyer may withdraw without giving any reason and without penalty. Any deposit paid must be returned in full within 21 days. This cooling-off period applies to the compromis (or promesse), not to the final deed, and is a mandatory protection that cannot be waived. The compromis must prominently state the buyer’s right of retraction, failing which an administrative fine of up to €3,000 for individuals and €15,000 for legal entities may be imposed. For the foreign buyer, this ten-day window provides a vital opportunity to have the documents reviewed by an independent French lawyer and to seek any additional information about the property.

B. The Acte Authentique: Transferring Title, the Notaire’s Role and Final Safeguards

Once all conditions precedent are satisfied and the compromis is firm, the parties proceed to the acte authentique de vente (authentic deed of sale), signed before a notaire. In the French legal system, the notaire is not merely a witness or certifying officer: the notaire is a public officer (officier public) vested with the authority of the State, responsible for verifying the legality of the transaction, ensuring the valid transfer of title, collecting transfer taxes on behalf of the French Treasury, and registering the deed with the Service de la publicité foncière (Land Registry). The involvement of a notaire is mandatory for any sale of real estate in France. Typically, a single notaire handles the transaction—most often the buyer’s choice—although both parties may each appoint their own, with the fees shared.

The notaire‘s role is governed by strict professional obligations, the most significant of which is the devoir de conseil (duty to advise) owed to both parties. In a published decision of 16 November 2023 (Cass. 3e civ., 16 Nov. 2023, no. 22-14.091, Bull.), the Cour de cassation reaffirmed that « le notaire est tenu d’éclairer les parties et d’appeler leur attention sur la portée, les effets et les risques des actes auxquels il prête son concours » — the notary must enlighten the parties and draw their attention to the scope, effects and risks of the instruments to which he lends his assistance. The Court also clarified the limits of this duty, holding that it does not extend to the economic wisdom of contracts concluded without the notary’s participation, but that there is a duty to verify the coherence of the overall contractual framework when the notary is aware that related agreements form part of a single transaction.

For a foreign buyer who may never have encountered the civil law notarial system, the notaire serves as an essential bridge between French law and the buyer’s expectations. The notaire verifies the seller’s title over the preceding thirty years (origine de propriété), checks for pre-emption rights (droits de préemption) exercisable by the municipality (the droit de préemption urbain) or by the SAFER (agricultural land agency) in rural areas, confirms that all planning permissions (permis de construire, déclarations préalables) have been obtained, and ensures that the copropriété regulations—where the property is an apartment—have been fully communicated and the relevant service charges are current.

On the day of signature, the notaire reads the full deed aloud to both parties (the lecture de l’acte), explains its terms in plain language, answers questions and collects the buyer’s funds—which must have been transferred to the notaire‘s compte séquestre (escrow account) in advance. The purchase price, fees and taxes are settled through this dedicated client account, which is subject to strict regulatory oversight. The notaire then issues the attestation de vente (certificate of sale) immediately upon signature, which serves as provisional proof of ownership pending registration. The final registered title deed (titre de propriété) is received by the buyer several months later, once the Land Registry has completed its publication formalities.

Between the signature of the compromis and the final deed, a period of typically two to three months elapses. During this interval, the notaire conducts all the administrative searches (recherches administratives) necessary to verify the absence of any hidden charges, pre-emption rights or planning restrictions. The buyer should use this period to finalise insurance—home insurance (assurance habitation) is mandatory in France, and proof must be provided on the day of completion—to open a French bank account if this has not already been done, and, where applicable, to register with the relevant utilities and local tax authorities.

A recurring concern for foreign buyers relates to the garantie des vices cachés (warranty against hidden defects), governed by Article 1641 of the Civil Code: « Le vendeur est tenu de la garantie à raison des défauts cachés de la chose vendue qui la rendent impropre à l’usage auquel on la destine, ou qui diminuent tellement cet usage que l’acheteur ne l’aurait pas acquise, ou n’en aurait donné qu’un moindre prix, s’il les avait connus. » The seller warrants the property against hidden defects that render it unfit for its intended use, or that diminish that use to such an extent that the buyer would not have purchased—or would have paid less—had they been known. However, Article 1642 provides an important limitation: the seller is not liable for apparent defects that the buyer could have discovered for himself (« Le vendeur n’est pas tenu des vices apparents et dont l’acheteur a pu se convaincre lui-même. »). For a foreign buyer who may be less familiar with French construction methods, regional stonework, humidity patterns or signs of structural distress, this limitation is particularly significant. It is strongly advisable to commission an independent building survey (expertise) by a qualified professional, even though this is not a legal requirement in France as it is in the United Kingdom or the United States.

Where the property is located within a copropriété (a condominium or apartment building governed by co-ownership rules), the buyer is entitled to receive the règlement de copropriété (co-ownership regulations), the état descriptif de division (description of the division into lots), the minutes of the last three general assemblies of co-owners (procès-verbaux d’assemblée générale), and the carnet d’entretien (maintenance log). These documents are essential to understanding whether major renovation works have been voted, whether there are ongoing disputes between co-owners, whether short-term rentals are permitted or restricted, and what the current level of charges de copropriété (service charges) is. An unprepared buyer may find themselves liable for a substantial share of roof or façade renovation works voted before the purchase but payable by whoever owns the lot at the time the works are carried out.

For foreign buyers acquiring a newly built or recently completed property, the garantie décennale (ten-year builder’s warranty) and the garantie de parfait achèvement (one-year perfect completion warranty), both governed by Articles 1792 and following of the Civil Code, provide substantial protection against construction defects. These warranties run with the property and are automatically transferred to the new owner upon resale within the relevant period. Likewise, for buyers contemplating holding the property through a French société civile immobilière (SCI), the structural implications for inheritance planning, wealth tax and capital gains tax should be analysed with a lawyer before the purchase structure is finalised.

Throughout the conveyancing process, our firm assists international clients in reviewing preliminary contracts, liaising with the notaire, verifying the completeness of the diagnostic file and negotiating protective clauses—all with an understanding of the specific challenges faced by non-resident buyers, from language barriers and distance to the unfamiliar interaction between French property law and the legal and tax systems of their home jurisdiction.

Conclusion

Buying property in France as a foreigner is an achievable and well-regulated process, provided the buyer approaches it with an understanding of the legal architecture and an awareness of where French law diverges from that of their home country. The French Civil Code and the Construction and Housing Code provide substantial protections—a mandatory ten-day cooling-off period, a strict duty of disclosure imposed on the seller, rigorous professional obligations on the notaire, and a robust statutory warranty regime—but they also impose duties of diligence, good faith and procedural precision on the buyer.

The sequence is clear: define the project and budget with realistic assumptions about fees and taxes; search for the property and conduct thorough due diligence on its physical and legal condition; negotiate the compromis de vente with carefully drafted conditions suspensives that reflect the buyer’s actual financing circumstances; observe the mandatory ten-day retraction period and use it to seek independent legal advice; diligently pursue the satisfaction of the conditions within their contractual deadlines; and, once all conditions are fulfilled, attend the acte authentique before the notaire for the final transfer of ownership.

The French courts have consistently upheld a high standard of protection for buyers who act in good faith and with reasonable diligence. The decisions of the Cour de cassation reviewed in this guide demonstrate that sellers who fail to disclose material defects, hidden servitudes or incomplete property descriptions face the prospect of price reductions, rescission of the sale or damages. The notaire, as a public officer bound by a statutory duty to advise, provides an additional—and mandatory—layer of security. For the informed foreign buyer, these safeguards collectively make the French property acquisition process one of the most legally secure in Europe.

Source: Cour de cassation – “Judilibre” & “Légifrance” Open Data.

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
4 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.