Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Live Abroad and Want to Close Your French Company: Dissolution, Liquidation, Tax and Striking Off Without Flying to Paris

You created a French company two or three years ago, the project never took off or the market shifted, and now the entity sits dormant while costs keep running. The accountant still invoices for the annual accounts, the URSSAF (the social-security collection agency) keeps sending calls for contributions, the bank charges monthly fees on a corporate account you barely use, and the commercial lease or domiciliation contract renews silently. From London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, the question is simple and urgent: how do you close this French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company) or SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited-liability company) cleanly, stop the bleeding, and strike it off the register without flying to Paris for every signature? This guide answers that question from start to finish, for a foreign founder or foreign shareholder who lives abroad.

French law does not let you simply walk away. A company that stops trading but remains registered keeps producing legal, tax and social-security obligations: annual accounts must be approved and filed with the greffe (the registry office of the commercial court), corporate income tax returns must be filed, VAT returns continue where the company is still identified for VAT, and payroll and social declarations continue as long as an employee or a remunerated director remains on the books. The company keeps its legal personality until the liquidation is closed and the striking-off entry, called radiation, is published on the commercial register, the RCS (registre du commerce et des sociétés). The extract that proves the company exists, the Kbis, remains available until that radiation. The official bulletin that carries company notices, the BODACC (bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales), will in turn publish the dissolution and then the closing of the liquidation. Only that sequence stops the meter.

The good news is that the whole route can be handled remotely when the file is prepared properly: collective decision taken in writing or by video meeting, electronic filing on the guichet unique (the single online window for business formalities, operated by the INPI, the national industrial-property institute), publication of the legal notice in a SHAL (support habilité à recevoir des annonces légales, an authorised legal-notices newspaper), and powers of attorney for the signatures that require a handwritten original. The traps are equally clear: closing too fast while a creditor, a tax reassessment or an employee claim is pending exposes the liquidator personally, and the tax administration treats any cessation as an immediate taxable event. The two parts below follow the only safe order: first dissolve the company and give the dissolution effect against third parties, then liquidate, clear the tax position and obtain the striking off. Our hub guide on setting up a company in France as a foreign founder covers the birth of the company; this article covers its clean ending.

I. How do you dissolve a French SAS or SARL when you live abroad?

Dissolution is the legal act that decides the death of the company. Liquidation is the settlement that follows. Confusing the two is the most common mistake of foreign shareholders: they stop paying, close the bank account and assume the company is gone, while the RCS still shows an active company and the liabilities keep growing. A proper dissolution is a deliberate collective decision, followed by a filing that makes it enforceable against third parties. From abroad, both steps are accessible, provided the articles of association, called statuts, allow remote decisions or are amended to allow them.

A. Vote the early dissolution and appoint the liquidator from abroad

For a solvent company, the standard route is the voluntary early dissolution, decided by the shareholders before the term fixed in the statuts. The Civil Code lists the ways a company ends, and among them: “Par la dissolution anticipée décidée par les associés” (Article 1844-7, 4° of the Civil Code, in force). That decision belongs to the shareholders collectively, under the majority rules set by the statuts for a SAS or by statute for a SARL, and it must also appoint one or more liquidators, fix their powers and their pay, and set the registered address of the liquidation, which may be the former registered office or the liquidator’s address. The same meeting normally notes the appointment of the liquidator, who can be the former president of the SAS, the former gérant (manager) of the SARL, one of the shareholders, or an outside professional. Nothing in the statute requires the shareholders to be physically present in France: a SAS whose statuts allow written consultation or video meeting can decide everything remotely, and a SARL can do the same where the statuts or the applicable provisions allow it. In practice, the foreign founder signs the minutes, has them countersigned where the bank or the greffe asks for an original, and gives a written power of attorney to the person who will file in France.

Two special cases deserve attention because foreign-owned companies meet them often. The first is the one-shareholder company: where all shares end up in a single hand, the Civil Code provides a fast-track regime, the TUP (transmission universelle du patrimoine, universal transfer of assets). The statute states: “En cas de dissolution, celle-ci entraîne la transmission universelle du patrimoine de la société à l’associé unique, sans qu’il y ait lieu à liquidation.” (Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code). There is then no liquidation phase at all: the sole shareholder takes the assets and the debts directly. But creditors are protected: “Les créanciers peuvent faire opposition à la dissolution dans le délai de trente jours à compter de la publication de celle-ci.” So the publication must be handled carefully, the thirty-day window must be left to run, and the transfer becomes effective only at the end of that period or once any objection is rejected or secured. Note that this shortcut is excluded where the sole shareholder is a natural person; a foreign individual holding 100 percent of a SASU or EURL therefore follows the ordinary dissolution-then-liquidation route described in this article.

The second special case is the company that cannot decide because the shareholders are deadlocked. Foreign co-founders who each hold half the capital know the pattern: one wants to close and cut the costs, the other refuses to sign anything, meetings end in shouting, and the company drifts. The Civil Code offers a judicial exit: “Par la dissolution anticipée prononcée par le tribunal à la demande d’un associé pour justes motifs, notamment en cas d’inexécution de ses obligations par un associé, ou de mésentente entre associés paralysant le fonctionnement de la société” (Article 1844-7, 5° of the Civil Code). The Cour de cassation applies this text strictly but confirms the exit where the breakdown is real. In a decision of 28 May 2026 (pourvoi no. 25-14.596), the commercial chamber recalled: “Après avoir exactement énoncé que la société prend fin par la dissolution anticipée, prononcée par le tribunal, à la demande d’un associé pour justes motifs, notamment en cas de mésentente entre les associés paralysant le fonctionnement de la société”, then approved the finding that “la mésentente entre les associés et la perte de tout affectio societatis entraînaient la paralysie de fonctionnement de la société”. Affectio societatis is the Latin name for the willingness to work together as partners; once it is gone and the bodies of the company can no longer function, the court can order dissolution even against the will of one side. For a founder abroad, the practical lesson is to keep written proof of the deadlock (failed convocations, refused votes, blocked accounts) before petitioning the court, because a mere disagreement on strategy is not enough: the paralysis must be shown.

Where the company is not merely dormant but insolvent, none of the above applies. A company that cannot pay its due debts from its available assets is in cessation des paiements (insolvency) and must be taken to the collective-proceedings regime (safeguard, receivership, judicial liquidation) within forty-five days, not through a voluntary amicable liquidation. Attempting a friendly winding-up of an insolvent company is a fault that can cost the director dearly, as the second part of this article explains. When in doubt, ask the accountant for a dated solvency statement before voting the dissolution: assets realisable, liabilities due, cash available. If the balance is negative, stop and take insolvency advice first.

B. File the dissolution on the guichet unique and publish it against third parties

Once the dissolution is voted, it must be made public, because an unpublished dissolution binds the shareholders but not the outside world. The Commercial Code is explicit: “La dissolution d’une société ne produit ses effets à l’égard des tiers qu’à compter de la date à laquelle elle est publiée au registre du commerce et des sociétés.” (Article L. 237-2 of the Commercial Code). From that same instant, the company enters liquidation by operation of law: “La société est en liquidation dès l’instant de sa dissolution pour quelque cause que ce soit”, and: “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation, jusqu’à la clôture de celle-ci.” The company name must from then on be followed by the words société en liquidation (company in liquidation) on every letter, invoice and filing; the regulation adds: “La mention ” société en liquidation ” ainsi que le nom du ou des liquidateurs doivent figurer sur tous les actes et documents émanant de la société et destinés aux tiers, notamment sur toutes lettres, factures, annonces et publications diverses.” (Article R. 237-1 of the Commercial Code). A foreign director who keeps signing contracts under the old name without the mention takes a personal risk for the confusion created.

In practice the filing runs through the single window. Since 1 January 2023, all business creation, modification and cessation declarations go through one electronic file: “Ce dossier est déposé par voie électronique auprès d’un organisme unique désigné à cet effet.” (Article L. 123-33 of the Commercial Code). For a French company that window is the guichet unique run by the INPI, which forwards the data to the greffe, the tax office (the DGFIP, direction générale des finances publiques), the statistical institute INSEE and the social bodies. The file for a dissolution contains the signed minutes deciding the dissolution, the identity documents of the liquidator, the certificate of publication of the dissolution notice in an authorised legal-notices paper, and the standard declaration form generated by the window. A founder living abroad completes this through an online account, with electronic signatures where accepted and with scanned originals where the greffe still asks for them; the appointed representative in France can file under a written mandate. Expect the greffe to check the exact company name, the RCS number shown on the Kbis, the dates, and the spelling of the liquidator’s name: those four points cause most rejections of foreign-filed dossiers.

The legal notice itself matters more than founders think. The dissolution notice must identify the company, its capital, its registered office, its RCS number and city of registration, the date and author of the dissolution decision, the name and address of the liquidator, and the address of the liquidation. It is published in a SHAL of the department of the registered office, and the registrar publishes in turn in the BODACC. Keep both proofs: the SHAL certificate for the filing, and the BODACC reference for the file. Creditors, landlords, banks and the tax office calculate their objection periods from these publications, and the thirty-day creditor objection period of the TUP regime runs from the publication of the dissolution. A dissolution that is voted but never published leaves the directors exposed to creditors who can still rely on the apparent active company, and it does not stop the social and tax bodies from treating the company as alive.

Three remote-execution points close this first stage. First, the liquidation address fixes where creditors must send claims and where court papers will be served; choosing the French accountant’s office or the lawyer’s office as liquidation address, rather than a foreign home address, speeds up every later step. Second, notify the bank, the landlord, the insurer and the accountant on the day of the dissolution, enclosing the SHAL certificate and the updated Kbis showing the société en liquidation mention once issued; banks in particular freeze online access and require the liquidator’s specimen signature before releasing any payment. Third, stop taking new business immediately: the liquidator’s mandate is to wind up, realise the assets and pay the creditors, not to continue trading except where a short continuation is needed to finish pending contracts or to sell the business as a going concern. Any new commitment beyond the needs of the liquidation can be reclassified as the liquidator’s personal act.

II. How do you liquidate, pay tax and strike the company off without returning to France?

Liquidation is the settlement phase: sell what can be sold, collect what is owed, pay what is due in the legal order, establish the final accounts, and share any remainder, called boni de liquidation (liquidation surplus), among the shareholders. From abroad, this phase is paperwork-heavy but entirely manageable by correspondence, provided the liquidator respects two hard rules verified by the courts every year: clear all the liabilities first, and never close while a dispute that could cost the company money is still open without securing it. The reward for discipline is a clean Kbis de radiation and a tax clearance that lets the founder sleep; the price of haste is personal liability of the liquidator.

A. Clear the liabilities, close the accounts and approve the liquidation

The statute sets the framework simply: “Sous réserve des dispositions du présent chapitre, la liquidation des sociétés est régie par les dispositions contenues dans les statuts.” (Article L. 237-1 of the Commercial Code), completed where the statuts are silent by the detailed provisions of the chapter, which can also be imposed by a court at the request of shareholders holding at least 5 percent of the capital in SARLs and joint-stock companies, or at the request of the creditors: “D’associés représentant au moins 5 % du capital, dans les sociétés en commandite simple, les sociétés à responsabilité limitée et les sociétés par actions” and “Des créanciers sociaux.” (Article L. 237-14 of the Commercial Code). In plain terms, the liquidator inventories the assets and liabilities, terminates or transfers the current contracts (lease, domiciliation, software, insurance), collects the receivables including the unpaid invoices owed by French clients, sells the stock and equipment, dismisses or transfers the employees under the Labour Code procedure where there is still staff, and pays the creditors in their rank: employees and social bodies first in practice through the privilege system, then the tax administration, then secured lenders, then unsecured suppliers, with shareholders coming last.

Each year while the liquidation lasts, the liquidator must report. The Commercial Code requires: “Le liquidateur, dans les trois mois de la clôture de chaque exercice, établit les comptes annuels au vu de l’inventaire qu’il a dressé des divers éléments de l’actif et du passif existant à cette date et un rapport écrit par lequel il rend compte des opérations de liquidation au cours de l’exercice écoulé.” (Article L. 237-25 of the Commercial Code). The shareholders meet at least once a year to approve those interim accounts. For a dormant company with no assets left, this yearly cycle is short; for a company selling a lease right or waiting for a court outcome, it can run two or three years. A founder abroad approves these accounts by the same remote means as the dissolution decision, and the accountant in France prepares the inventory that supports them.

The decisive court warning concerns disputed debts. The Cour de cassation held on 11 March 2026 (pourvoi no. 24-21.461, EURL case) that: “la liquidation amiable d’une société impose l’apurement intégral du passif, les créances litigieuses devant, jusqu’au terme des procédures en cours, être garanties par une provision”, and that: “en l’absence d’actif social suffisant pour répondre du montant des condamnations éventuellement prononcées à l’encontre de la société, il lui appartient de différer la clôture de la liquidation et de solliciter, le cas échéant, l’ouverture d’une procédure collective contre la société”. The legal basis is the liability statute: “Le liquidateur est responsable, à l’égard tant de la société que des tiers, des conséquences dommageables des fautes par lui commises dans l’exercice de ses fonctions.” (Article L. 237-12 of the Commercial Code), combined with the burden-of-proof rule: “Celui qui réclame l’exécution d’une obligation doit la prouver. Réciproquement, celui qui se prétend libéré doit justifier le paiement ou le fait qui a produit l’extinction de son obligation.” (Article 1353 of the Civil Code). Translated for a foreign liquidator: if a former employee has filed a claim before the conseil de prud’hommes (the labour court), if URSSAF has notified a reassessment that is under challenge, or if a client sues for an unpaid invoice, the liquidator must either keep enough money aside as a provision until the final judgment, or refuse to close and hand the file to the insolvency court. Closing the liquidation, cashing the remainder and asking for the striking off while such a case is pending is exactly the fault the Cour de cassation punished: the liquidator paid nothing, closed, and was ordered to compensate the creditor personally. Our companion guides on URSSAF audits challenged from abroad and on dismissing the first employee from abroad detail those two frequent pending cases; never close the liquidation until each of them is either finally settled or fully provisioned and disclosed in the closing accounts.

Once the liabilities are cleared or provisioned, the endgame is a second collective decision: approval of the final liquidation accounts, quitus (discharge) given to the liquidator for the management of the liquidation, acknowledgement of the closing of the liquidation operations, and distribution of the surplus if any. This closing decision is published in the same way as the dissolution (SHAL notice announcing the closing, filing on the guichet unique, entry in the RCS, second BODACC publication), and the liquidator files for the striking off, the radiation. The greffe then issues the final proof that the company no longer exists. Keep that radiation Kbis permanently: banks, landlords and the tax office sometimes keep sending automated reminders for months after the closing, and the radiation extract ends every discussion in one page.

B. Pay the final corporate tax, declare the cessation and obtain the striking off

Cessation is an immediate taxable event in France, and foreign shareholders discover this too late. The Tax Code provides for income-tax companies that: “l’impôt sur le revenu dû en raison des bénéfices réalisés dans cette entreprise ou exploitation et qui n’ont pas encore été imposés est immédiatement établi” (Article 201, 1 of the General Tax Code, Code général des impôts), with a forty-five-day notice period and a sixty-day return for the actual profit, the administration assessing the base automatically where the returns are missing. For companies subject to corporate income tax (the IS, impôt sur les sociétés), the mechanism is extended directly: “En cas de dissolution, de transformation entraînant la création d’une personne morale nouvelle, d’apport en société, de fusion, de transfert du siège ou d’un établissement dans un Etat étranger autre qu’un Etat membre de l’Union européenne”, and in that case “l’impôt sur les sociétés est établi dans les conditions prévues aux 1 et 3 de l’article 201” (Article 221, 2 of the General Tax Code). In practice the accountant must file the final IS return within sixty days of the cessation publication, pay the balance, settle the last VAT return (the TVA, taxe sur la valeur ajoutée) and the final employer declarations, and request the tax clearance certificate where the greffe or a buyer asks for it. Our guide on corporate tax instalments, losses and challenges from abroad explains the IS mechanics that apply one last time here; our guide on VAT registration and returns from abroad explains the final VAT return and the recovery of any VAT credit before the radiation, a credit that is lost in practice once the company is struck off.

The surplus distributed to the shareholders at the end, the boni de liquidation, is itself taxed as a distribution. For individual shareholders resident abroad, French withholding and the tax treaty of their home country decide the final cost; for French-resident shareholders, the general investment-income regime applies, with the well-known 40 percent allowance on dividends distributed by companies subject to corporate tax in the European Union or in a treaty state with an administrative-assistance clause, decided by the competent corporate bodies: the Tax Code frames that allowance at Article 158, 3, 2° of the General Tax Code, and the link leads to the official text in force. Do not confuse this surplus with a dividend voted during the life of the company: it can only be distributed after the closing accounts are approved, and any advance taken by a shareholder before the creditors are paid can be clawed back. Where the company owns real estate, the closing also triggers registration duties and possibly capital-gains tax on the property; sell or transfer the property before voting the closing, not after, so the gain is booked inside the liquidation accounts rather than discovered afterwards.

Social and payroll clearance runs in parallel. As long as the company employs staff or pays its director, the DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly payroll return) and the URSSAF payments continue; the closure of the payroll account must be declared, the final certificates delivered to the employees (attestation France Travail, the unemployment-insurance certificate, final payslips, solde de tout compte, the final-settlement receipt), and the employment register closed. For a director who held a French social-security affiliation, request the radiation from the relevant scheme and keep the written confirmation: URSSAF and the health-insurance bodies are the most frequent senders of post-radiation reminders, and a dated confirmation letter closes those files without a dispute. Where the director lived abroad under a secondment or multi-state affiliation, keep the A1 certificate or the coverage decision with the closing file, because the question of which country collects the last contributions returns in almost every cross-border closure.

The final administrative sequence, all feasible from abroad through the representative, runs as follows: vote the closing and the discharge, publish the closing notice in the SHAL, file the closing dossier on the guichet unique with the closing minutes, the final accounts, the SHAL certificate and the tax and social clearance proofs, wait for the RCS entry and the BODACC publication, then download the radiation Kbis and close the bank account with it. Only at that point should the liquidator distribute any surplus and destroy nothing: French commercial books and tax documents must be kept for the statutory retention periods (ten years for commercial books, six years for tax documents in the current regime), and the closing file should name the person entrusted with keeping them, with a reachable address. Founders who keep a French bank account open for a few extra weeks after the radiation to cash the last refunds and pay the last invoices avoid the painful situation of a balance trapped in an account whose holder no longer legally exists.

Conclusion

Closing a French SAS or SARL from abroad is a two-act procedure, and the order cannot be inverted: a collective dissolution decision, published so it binds third parties, then a liquidation that pays or secures every creditor before any distribution, with the tax and social accounts settled at the same pace and the striking off as the final seal. The foreign founder who respects that order, provisions the disputed claims instead of hiding them, files the final IS and VAT returns inside the sixty-day windows, and keeps the SHAL certificates, the BODACC references and the radiation Kbis in one file, ends the venture with a clean record and can reinvest in France later without a dormant liability resurfacing. The founder who simply stops paying, empties the account and leaves the company on the register keeps a living debtor in France: the greffe still shows an active company, URSSAF and the DGFIP keep assessing, interest and penalties accrue, and the return to France, even years later for a new project, starts with the old file. Between those two paths the difference is a few weeks of disciplined paperwork and one careful closing vote. Prepare the minutes, mandate a representative, publish properly, provision the disputes, pay the final tax, and strike off: the company will be gone, and the proof will fit on a single page.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9262 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
1 week ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.