Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Cannot Pay Its Bills and You Live Abroad: Cessation des Paiements, Redressement, Liquidation and How to Limit Director Liability

Your French company has stopped paying its suppliers, the landlord is threatening to terminate the lease, URSSAF — the French social-security collection agency — has sent a formal demand, and you live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. The first question is brutally practical: can you still close the company quietly with a voluntary dissolution, or has the law already moved you into a different regime where only a court can decide what happens next? French law draws a hard line at a concept called cessation des paiements, best translated as cash-flow insolvency: the moment your company can no longer pay its due debts with its available cash. Once that line is crossed, a voluntary wind-down is no longer available, and you have forty-five days to ask a commercial court to open insolvency proceedings. Miss that deadline and your personal exposure as a director grows with every week that passes. This guide explains, for a foreign owner or director who runs a French SARL or SAS from abroad, how to recognise insolvency, how to file for redressement judiciaire (court-supervised reorganisation) or liquidation judiciaire (court-ordered liquidation) without living in France, what happens to your lease, your staff, your bank account and your tax debts once the court steps in, and how to limit your personal liability for the shortfall. If your company can still pay everything it owes, stop here and read our companion guide on voluntary closure instead: You Live Abroad and Want to Close Your French Company: Dissolution, Liquidation, Debts, Tax and How to Walk Away Cleanly. That guide covers the amiable route — dissolution, appointment of a liquidator, sale of assets, tax clearance and removal from the register. Everything below starts where that guide stops: the company cannot pay, and the court must take over. If the situation is reversed — it is your French customer who went bust owing you money — our creditor-side guide explains how a foreign supplier declares its claim and recovers its goods: Your French Customer Just Went Bust and You Live Abroad: How a Foreign Supplier Declares Its Claim, Takes Back Its Goods and Gets Paid. Our starting point for foreign founders, from bank account to Kbis to first hire, remains the pillar guide: Setting Up a Company in France as a Foreign Founder: Bank Account, Kbis, VAT and Your First Hire.

I. How a foreign owner files for redressement or liquidation from abroad

French insolvency law does not care where you live. It cares about two things: whether the company is in cessation des paiements, and whether you filed within forty-five days. Both questions are decided in France, before the commercial court of the place where the company has its registered office — since 2025 reorganised as the tribunal des activités économiques, the economic-activities court, in most large cities including Paris. You can prepare and sign everything from abroad, but the filing lands on a French court desk, the judgment is published in France, and the court-appointed officers who take control work in France. Understanding that geography is the key to acting fast instead of hoping the problem resolves itself.

A. Your company cannot pay its bills: how French law defines insolvency and the 45-day filing duty

Cessation des paiements sounds like a balance-sheet test, but it is a cash test. The company may own valuable stock, equipment or receivables and still be insolvent if none of that can be turned into cash in time to pay debts that are already due. The statute that opens redressement judiciaire — the reorganisation procedure — states it directly: “Il est institué une procédure de redressement judiciaire ouverte à tout débiteur mentionné aux articles L. 631-2 ou L. 631-3 qui, dans l’impossibilité de faire face au passif exigible avec son actif disponible, est en cessation des paiements.” In plain English: a debtor that cannot meet its currently due liabilities with its available assets is in cessation des paiements, and that state opens the door to court proceedings. The same article adds an important nuance for debtors who have negotiated breathing room: “Le débiteur qui établit que les réserves de crédit ou les moratoires dont il bénéficie de la part de ses créanciers lui permettent de faire face au passif exigible avec son actif disponible n’est pas en cessation des paiements.” A confirmed bank overdraft facility you have not yet drawn, or a written payment moratorium granted by your main creditors, can keep you outside insolvency — but only if the documents are real, current and sufficient to cover what is due. A vague promise from a supplier on the phone does not count.

For a foreign owner, the practical test looks like this. List every debt that is due right now: unpaid supplier invoices past their terms, rent arrears, the URSSAF contributions bill, the VAT balance due to the tax office, loan instalments, unpaid wages. Then list the cash you can mobilise immediately: bank balances, undrawn confirmed credit lines, and any formal moratorium your creditors have signed. If the first list exceeds the second, you are almost certainly in cessation des paiements, and the clock is running. The date matters enormously because the court will later fix the legal date of insolvency in its opening judgment, and everything — suspect-period cancellations, director liability, the ranking of claims — flows from that date. Do not backdate or disguise payments to look solvent: once the court fixes the date, transactions made after it can be annulled, and payments that favour one creditor over the others can be challenged by the liquidator.

From the moment insolvency begins, the director has a personal legal duty to file. The rule is short and strict: “L’ouverture d’une procédure de redressement judiciaire doit être demandée par le débiteur au plus tard dans les quarante-cinq jours qui suivent la cessation des paiements s’il n’a pas, dans ce délai, demandé l’ouverture d’une procédure de conciliation.” Conciliation is a confidential, court-supervised negotiation with creditors, available only if you are not yet insolvent or have been insolvent for less than forty-five days: “Il est institué, devant le tribunal de commerce, une procédure de conciliation dont peuvent bénéficier les débiteurs exerçant une activité commerciale ou artisanale qui éprouvent une difficulté juridique, économique ou financière, avérée ou prévisible, et ne se trouvent pas en cessation des paiements depuis plus de quarante-cinq jours.” If you are still inside the forty-five-day window, requesting conciliation pauses the filing duty while you negotiate. If conciliation was already running when the window expired, the Cour de cassation — France’s supreme court for commercial matters — has held that the debtor is excused during the conciliation and must file immediately when it ends: “Il résulte de la combinaison de ces textes que, lorsque le délai de quarante-cinq jours prévu par le second expire au cours de la procédure conciliation, le débiteur est dispensé d’exécuter son obligation de demander l’ouverture d’une procédure de redressement judiciaire. A l’expiration de la procédure de conciliation, le débiteur est en revanche tenu d’exécuter cette obligation sans délai.” That decision, dated 20 November 2024 on appeal number 23-12.297, is the reason experienced counsel sometimes file for conciliation first: it buys a protected negotiation window, but it never cancels the duty — it only postpones it.

Filing from abroad is entirely possible but requires method. The declaration of cessation des paiements — universally called the dépôt de bilan, literally the filing of the balance sheet — is lodged at the greffe, the court clerk’s office, of the competent court, increasingly through the online single window. The file must include recent accounts, a statement of receivables and payables, the number of employees, pending lawsuits, and a description of the available cash. A director living abroad typically signs a pouvoir, a written power of attorney, authorising a French lawyer to file and appear. The court then summons the director — presence by videoconference or through counsel is commonly accepted — and examines whether the company should enter redressement, with a chance of survival, or go straight to liquidation. The official service-public guide for businesses describes the filing contents and the clerk’s role step by step: Déclaration de cessation des paiements (dépôt de bilan). The Paris court’s own procedure page lists the documents its greffe expects: the Paris economic-activities court clerk’s procedure page for filing a cessation-declaration case. Start assembling bank statements, the aged creditor list, employment contracts and the lease now, because the court will ask for them within days, and a foreign-based director who answers in weeks instead of days is already building the file for a liability claim.

One fork in the road must be settled before you file anything. If the company is not in cessation des paiements — it can still pay, but you simply want out — do not file for insolvency. Close it voluntarily under the dissolution-liquidation procedure, where you control the timetable and keep the company’s legal personality for the needs of the wind-down: “La société est en liquidation dès l’instant de sa dissolution pour quelque cause que ce soit sauf dans le cas prévu au troisième alinéa de l’article 1844-5 du code civil.” Filing for redressement or liquidation when the company is solvent wastes the court’s time, alarms every creditor and bank, and publishes a failure that never needed to exist. When in doubt, have a lawyer test solvency on paper before choosing the door: the voluntary route is described in our companion guide at You Live Abroad and Want to Close Your French Company: Dissolution, Liquidation, Debts, Tax and How to Walk Away Cleanly.

B. Redressement or liquidation: which court procedure fits, and what changes on day one

Redressement judiciaire and liquidation judiciaire both start from cessation des paiements, but they answer opposite questions. Redressement asks whether the business can be saved: the statute defines it as a procedure meant to allow the continuation of the activity, the preservation of jobs and the clearing of debts through a court-approved plan adopted after an observation period. Liquidation answers that rescue is manifestly impossible: “Il est institué une procédure de liquidation judiciaire ouverte à tout débiteur mentionné à l’article L. 640-2 en cessation des paiements et dont le redressement est manifestement impossible.” Its purpose is to end the activity or sell the assets, globally or piecemeal. In practice the court often opens redressement first, observes the business for several months with the help of court-appointed officers, and converts to liquidation if no serious rescue plan emerges. Infogreffe — the official portal of the commercial court clerks — summarises how the observation period, the creditors’ consultation and the plan work: Tout savoir sur le redressement judiciaire, Infogreffe. For a foreign owner, the honest question to put to counsel before filing is whether anyone — you, a buyer, a competitor — would fund a rescue plan. If the answer is no and the company has no viable activity left, asking directly for liquidation saves months of fees, but the court decides, not you.

Three officers will enter your company’s life the day the court rules, and every foreign director should know their names. The mandataire judiciaire, the court-appointed creditors’ representative, represents the creditors collectively, collects their claims and can later sue the directors for the shortfall. The administrateur judiciaire, appointed mainly in redressement, supervises or assists management and prepares the rescue plan; in liquidation the liquidator sells the assets. The juge-commissaire, a judge appointed to supervise the case, authorises key steps such as selling assets or continuing loss-making contracts. From the opening judgment, you no longer run the company alone: major decisions require the administrator’s countersignature or the judge’s permission, and the bank accounts pass under the officers’ control. Payments you make on your own initiative after the judgment can be void and can feed a personal liability case against you.

The opening judgment also freezes the past. Its core effect is a general payment prohibition: “Le jugement ouvrant la procédure emporte, de plein droit, interdiction de payer toute créance née antérieurement au jugement d’ouverture, à l’exception du paiement par compensation de créances connexes.” You must stop paying old invoices, old rent arrears and old tax bills from the day of the judgment, even if a creditor threatens you — paying one old creditor out of order is exactly what the freeze forbids, and the liquidator can claw the payment back. Symmetrically, creditors can no longer sue you individually or seize the company’s assets; they must declare their claims to the mandataire within the legal deadline, and lawsuits already started are interrupted. The judgment is published in BODACC, the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements, which is why banks, suppliers and landlords learn about it within days. Your Kbis — the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe — will then carry a mention of the proceedings, and any counterparty who checks it will see the situation. That publicity is unavoidable; the only choice is whether it happens on your timetable, with a prepared filing, or on a creditor’s timetable, after a summons you ignored from abroad.

Day-one consequences for the lease, the staff and the bank follow automatically. The commercial lease — often a 3/6/9 lease, the standard French commercial lease with three-year break options — does not end by itself: the liquidator or administrator decides whether to continue it or terminate it, and the landlord must declare the arrears like any other creditor. Our guide on the 3/6/9 lease explains the deposit, renewal and exit mechanics that the insolvency officers will now operate: Your French Company Signed a 3/6/9 Commercial Lease and You Live Abroad: Deposit, Rent, Renewal and How to Exit Early. Employment contracts continue in principle, but the liquidator can dismiss staff quickly under a simplified insolvency procedure, with unpaid wages largely guaranteed by the AGS — the wage guarantee scheme funded by employers, which advances the money and then claims it back from the estate. The URSSAF debt and unpaid VAT join the pool of declared claims; the tax office gets no shortcut around the freeze. The corporate bank, once notified, freezes the accounts and declares its own claim for any overdraft or loan. If the bank had previously refused you an account or frozen onboarding, the dynamics described in our banking guide now reverse — the court, not the bank, controls the cash: French Bank Account Refused for Your Foreign-Owned SAS: Deposit Certificate, KYC Freeze and the Banque de France Right-to-Account Fix. Tell your French bank, your accountant and your payroll provider the day the judgment is issued; officers who discover hidden accounts or parallel payments treat them as evidence of bad faith.

II. How to limit your personal bill when the French company fails

Foreign founders often assume that a SARL or SAS — both limited-liability companies — shields them completely. Against ordinary business debts, that shield holds: the company’s creditors cannot normally pursue your house in London or your salary in New York. But French insolvency law pierces the shield in three precise situations: liability for the asset shortfall after a management fault, personal bankruptcy measures for grave misconduct, and liability for specific faults such as late filing that worsened the creditors’ position. None of these is automatic, all of them require the liquidator or the prosecutor to act and the court to be convinced, and each of them can be defended — but only if you understand what the court is looking for and you preserved the evidence from abroad.

A. Paying the shortfall yourself: faute de gestion, late filing and the liquidator’s claim

The central weapon of the liquidator is the action en responsabilité pour insuffisance d’actif — the liability action for the asset shortfall. When a judicial liquidation reveals that the assets do not cover the debts, the court can order the directors, de jure or de facto, whose management fault contributed to the shortfall to bear all or part of it personally. The Cour de cassation restates the rule in these exact terms: “Selon l’article L.651-2 du code de commerce, lorsque la liquidation judiciaire d’une personne morale fait apparaître une insuffisance d’actif, le tribunal peut, en cas de faute de gestion ayant contribué à cette insuffisance d’actif, décider que le montant de cette insuffisance d’actif sera supporté, en tout ou en partie, par tous les dirigeants de droit ou de fait, ou par certains d’entre eux, ayant contribué à la faute de gestion.” That ruling, issued 1 October 2025 on appeal number 23-12.234, rejected the director’s appeal against an order to pay 182,000 euros to the estate — a reminder that the sums at stake are real and routinely reach six figures. The statute itself says the same thing in the code: “Lorsque la liquidation judiciaire d’une personne morale fait apparaître une insuffisance d’actif, le tribunal peut, en cas de faute de gestion ayant contribué à cette insuffisance d’actif, décider que le montant de cette insuffisance d’actif sera supporté, en tout ou en partie, par tous les dirigeants de droit ou de fait, ou par certains d’entre eux, ayant contribué à la faute de gestion.” Note the three cumulative conditions the liquidator must prove: a liquidation with an asset shortfall, a management fault, and a contribution of that fault to the shortfall. Simple negligence alone was later carved out of the heaviest sanction by statute, but gross patterns — continuing a hopeless activity, hiding the accounts, using company money for personal ends — remain the classic faults.

The fault foreign directors commit most often is also the easiest to prove: filing late. Every month between the true date of insolvency and the actual filing deepens the debts, and the liquidator will ask the court to backdate the cessation date and charge you with the liabilities born in the gap. The 20 November 2024 ruling on appeal 23-12.297 shows exactly how courts reason: the judges examine when the company really stopped being able to pay, whether a conciliation covered the delay, and which debts arose after the forty-five-day deadline. A director who kept trading for six months while insolvent, paid some suppliers and ignored URSSAF, and only filed after a creditor served a summons is the textbook defendant. Your defence starts the day you suspect insolvency: stop taking new orders you cannot fulfil, stop repaying shareholder loans to yourself — the compte courant d’associé, the shareholder current account through which many foreign owners fund their company — and document every decision. Our guide on shareholder loans explains why repaying yourself ahead of other creditors shortly before insolvency is the payment a liquidator attacks first: You Lent Money to Your Own French Company and Live Abroad: Shareholder Loans, Interest, Repayment and Rescue When Cash Runs Short. Keep the management accounts, board minutes and email approvals that show you acted on information and advice, because the court judges your conduct with hindsight and the liquidator will present the worst reading of every gap.

Two boundaries protect you, and both were confirmed by the Cour de cassation in 2025. First, the shortfall action does not stack with ordinary company-law liability: where the shortfall action applies, a creditor cannot cumulate it with a parallel claim against the manager under the SARL liability article. The court put it plainly: “Il résulte de ces textes que lorsque le redressement ou la liquidation judiciaire d’une personne morale fait apparaître une insuffisance d’actif, les dispositions des articles L. 651-2 et L. 651-3 du code de commerce, qui ouvrent aux conditions qu’ils prévoient une action en responsabilité pour insuffisance d’actif à l’encontre des dirigeants de droit ou de fait en cas de faute de gestion ayant contribué à l’insuffisance d’actif, ne se cumulent pas avec celles de l’article L. 223-22 du même code.” That decision of 26 March 2025 on appeal 23-20.349 annulled a judgment that had condemned a manager twice over for the same facts. The underlying SARL rule it refers to remains the everyday standard outside insolvency: “Les gérants sont responsables, individuellement ou solidairement, selon le cas, envers la société ou envers les tiers, soit des infractions aux dispositions législatives ou réglementaires applicables aux sociétés à responsabilité limitée, soit des violations des statuts, soit des fautes commises dans leur gestion.” Second, only the liquidator, the public prosecutor or, in narrow conditions, a majority of the court-appointed creditor controllers can bring the shortfall action: “Dans les cas prévus à l’article L. 651-2 , le tribunal est saisi par le liquidateur ou le ministère public.” An angry supplier writing to you directly cannot condemn you to pay the shortfall; that supplier must go through the collective proceedings. Both points shape your strategy from abroad: cooperate with the liquidator’s information requests, since obstruction is itself treated as a fault indicator, and never pay an individual creditor who threatens you personally after the opening — refer every demand to the proceedings.

Beyond the shortfall, two personal sanctions hang over directors who behaved gravely: faillite personnelle, a personal bankruptcy order, and interdiction de gérer, a ban on managing any company, both pronounced by the insolvency court for misconduct such as using company assets as personal property, keeping fictitious accounts, or diverting the business. The statute lists the triggers — including disposing of company property as though it were personal — in article L.653-4 of the commercial code, and the ban can run for many years, published and enforceable across the European Union’s company registers. A foreign director who commutes between countries should take this seriously: a French management ban follows you into every directorship that requires registration in France and complicates banking and KYC checks everywhere. The same conduct can also support criminal prosecution for banqueroute, the criminal offence of fraudulent bankruptcy, punishable by imprisonment and fines. The practical shield is conduct, not distance: file on time, hand over complete accounts, do not move assets out of the company once insolvency looms, and never sign backdated documents. Distance has never excused a director in a French court; documented diligence from abroad has saved many.

B. Your practical checklist from abroad: money, staff, tax and how to challenge each bill

Once proceedings are opened, your job as a foreign owner changes from running the business to managing the fallout in an orderly way. Money first. Draw up the full creditor picture with your French accountant: supplier balances, rent arrears, the URSSAF statement, the VAT and corporate-tax balances, loan schedules, and any personal guarantee — the caution, the surety by which a bank made you personally guarantee the company’s loan — you may have signed. Our guide on personal guarantees explains how to read the guarantee deed, which defences survive insolvency, and how to seek payment delays from the guarantee creditor: Your French Company Owes Money and You Signed a Guarantee: Caution, Personal Exposure and How to Challenge It From Abroad. Expect the bank to call the guarantee the week the judgment is published; that is the moment to have the deed reviewed, not the month before. If you also funded the company through a shareholder current account, declare that claim in the proceedings like any creditor, but accept that it ranks after outside creditors in practice and that any repayment you took shortly before filing will be scrutinised.

Staff second. If the company employed people in France — even one person hired through the DPAE, the pre-hiring declaration filed with URSSAF — the liquidator handles the dismissals under the fast-track insolvency rules, and the AGS wage guarantee scheme covers most unpaid wages, notice pay and severance within its ceilings. Your duty is to supply complete payroll records, employment contracts and time sheets immediately, because late or missing payroll data delays the AGS advances and turns employees into adversaries. If you are yourself a director without an employment contract, you are not covered by the AGS; if you combined a genuine employment contract with your directorship, its validity will be examined strictly. Our hiring guide describes the DPAE, contract and payslip mechanics whose records the liquidator will now demand: Hiring Your First Employee in France While Living Abroad: DPAE, Contract, Payslip, URSSAF and How to Stay Compliant. And if you personally received salary or dividends from the company, expect questions: salary must match real work, and dividends voted while the company was already fragile can be attacked. The pay-and-dividends mechanics for foreign directors are detailed here: Living Abroad and Running Your French Company: How a Foreign Director Gets Paid, Which Social Security Applies and How to Challenge an URSSAF Bill. Dividends that stripped cash needed to pay creditors in the suspect period are among the first transactions a liquidator seeks to reverse.

Tax third. The French tax office declares its claims — VAT balances, corporate-tax instalments, withholding on dividends paid to you abroad — in the proceedings, and a tax audit already underway continues against the liquidator rather than against you. Our tax-audit guide explains the notice, duration and challenge mechanics that now run inside the collective proceedings: Your French Company Faces a Tax Audit and an URSSAF Control While You Live Abroad: Procedure, Deadlines and How to Challenge From Abroad. The URSSAF control follows the same logic: contribution arrears become a declared claim, and penalty disputes are litigated by the liquidator, though the URSSAF may separately pursue you if you were personally at fault — for example by deducting employee contributions from wages without paying them over. Keep every VAT return, every onboarding filing and every exchange with the tax office, because the liquidator will ask for them and gaps look like concealment. If the company held a French VAT number, its fate in liquidation — final returns, refunds, representative issues — follows the mechanics in our VAT guide: Your French Company and French VAT While Living Abroad: Registration, Invoicing, Refunds and How to Unblock From Abroad.

Challenge fourth — because insolvency is not the end of your rights. You can appeal the opening judgment itself if the court fixed a wrong insolvency date or chose liquidation where redressement was viable; the appeal has a short deadline, counted in days, so instruct counsel immediately. You can contest the liquidator’s verification of disputed claims, including the landlord’s inflated arrears or a supplier’s penalty clauses, before the juge-commissaire. You can defend any shortfall action by attacking each of its three conditions: no shortfall properly computed, no management fault, no causal contribution — and the 2025 case law above gives you the exact vocabulary: proportionality of any condemnation, the non-cumulation rule, and the conciliation protection window. You can negotiate the personal guarantee separately with the bank, seeking delays or a discount once the bank understands the estate will pay it little. And if the proceedings reveal that a co-shareholder blocked rescue funding or siphoned value, the deadlock and exclusion remedies described in our shareholder-dispute guide may supply the counter-claim that rebalances the negotiation: Your French Co-Shareholder Is Blocking Everything and You Live Abroad: Deadlock, Exclusion and Dissolution. Every challenge runs on French procedural deadlines measured in days and weeks, not months — which is why a foreign owner needs a French lawyer on record from the first week, not the third month.

Conclusion

A French company that cannot pay is not a company you can quietly switch off from abroad — it is a company the court must process, on a forty-five-day fuse, with your conduct as director under examination from the day you suspected trouble. The sequence that protects you is simple to state and demanding to execute: recognise cessation des paiements early with a cash test, not a hopeful balance sheet; request conciliation if negotiation could still save the business, otherwise declare insolvency within forty-five days through counsel holding your power of attorney; hand the court-appointed officers complete accounts, payroll and tax records without delay; stop all selective payments the day the judgment freezes old debts; and defend each later claim — shortfall action, guarantee call, tax bill — on its own legal conditions instead of treating them as one undifferentiated disaster. The voluntary closure route remains available only while the company can still pay: You Live Abroad and Want to Close Your French Company: Dissolution, Liquidation, Debts, Tax and How to Walk Away Cleanly. Once insolvency is established, the redressement-or-liquidation machinery, the creditor freeze, the AGS wage advances and the director-liability rules described above take over — and a director who filed on time, cooperated fully and documented every decision from abroad reaches the closing of the proceedings with the company’s debts extinguished and personal exposure contained. That outcome is earned in the first six weeks, not the sixth month: instruct, file and disclose now.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Running a French company from abroad leaves no room for guesswork once bills go unpaid. Get a phone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm who will review your cash position, your filing deadline and your personal exposure. Call 06 46 60 58 22 or send your documents through our contact page for a rapid assessment of your insolvency, filing and defence options.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

kader ladjouzi
7 hours ago

Best real estate and business law attorney in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
4 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.