Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Live Abroad and Want to Close Your French Company: Dissolution, Liquidation, Debts, Tax and How to Walk Away Cleanly

You created a French company for a project that never took off, or a subsidiary whose purpose is now over, and you live in London, Dubai, New York or Singapore. The company sleeps, but it still files, still pays its accountant, still receives letters from the tax office and URSSAF, the French social contributions agency, and the landlord still expects the rent. Closing the company looks simple from abroad: stop everything, let it die, walk away. French law does not work that way. A French company never dies by neglect. It ends through a formal two-step procedure, dissolution followed by liquidation, published at the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court, announced in the BODACC, the official gazette where company events are published, and closed with a strike-off from the RCS, the French trade and companies register. Skip a step, and the company legally survives, its debts keep growing, and creditors, including the landlord and the tax administration, can still sue it years after you thought it was gone. Worse, if you close it the wrong way while it owes money, your own personal assets can be pulled into the file through a personal guarantee, a mismanagement claim or a challenge to a hasty asset transfer. This guide explains, for a foreign owner who is not in France, how to choose between dissolving and selling, the exact steps that take a SAS or SARL off the register, which bills must be paid first, and how to fight a claim that blocks the closing from abroad. It is the disputes companion to our step-by-step filing guide for the same procedure (Closing Your French Company From Abroad: Dissolution, Liquidation, Strike-Off, Tax and Social Clearance for Foreign Owners): read that guide for the filing sequence, and this one for the traps, the creditor oppositions, the landlord suits and the remedies that decide whether the closing actually holds.

I. How do you legally close a French SAS or SARL when you live abroad?

A. Should you dissolve the company now or sell its shares instead?

The first decision is the most important, and foreign owners often get it backwards. There are two clean ways out of a French company: kill it through dissolution and liquidation, or transfer it by selling your shares to someone else. Each route suits a different situation, and choosing the wrong one costs months and money. Dissolution is the right answer when the company has no buyer, no valuable contracts, and its assets are worth less than the cost of keeping it alive. A sale is the better answer when the company holds something of value: a commercial lease in a good location, an established Kbis, the French business registration certificate that proves the company exists, a client portfolio, licences, or simply a clean history that a buyer will pay for. Our dedicated guide to that second route explains the approval clauses, price mechanics and tax treatment of a transfer made from abroad (Selling Your Shares in a French Company From Abroad: SAS and SARL Approval, Price, Tax and How to Close the File). Read it before you decide, because once dissolution is published, the company is marked for death and a sale becomes far harder to organise.

If you sell, be aware that the buyer can come back against you. French share deals almost always include a garantie d’actif et de passif, a warranty under which the seller compensates the buyer if hidden liabilities surface after the sale. The Cour de cassation, the highest French court for civil and commercial matters, regularly deals with sellers sued on that warranty years after the deal, as in a 21 April 2022 ruling where the buyer of all the shares of a SARL, the French limited liability company form, sued the seller for enforcement of the warranty and damages after discovering the true financial situation (Cass. com., 21 April 2022, No. 20-10.809, official decision). The facts of that case state the mechanism plainly: “Soutenant que la situation présentée par M. [V] ne correspondait pas à la réalité, la société 2EI l’a assigné en exécution de la garantie d’actif et de passif prévue par l’acte de cession et en paiement de dommages-intérêts”. A sale therefore does not always mean a clean break either; it exchanges the liquidation workload for warranty exposure, and the price must reflect that risk. If no buyer exists at a sensible price, dissolution is the honest route.

Dissolution itself comes in several forms, and only one of them is the voluntary closing this article describes. The Civil Code lists every way a company can end, and the voluntary case is stated in plain terms: “La société prend fin : 1° Par l’expiration du temps pour lequel elle a été constituée, sauf prorogation effectuée conformément à l’article 1844-6 ; 2° Par la réalisation ou l’extinction de son objet ; 3° Par l’annulation du contrat de société ; 4° Par la dissolution anticipée décidée par les associés” (Article 1844-7 of the Civil Code). That fourth case, early dissolution voted by the shareholders, is your route when the company can still pay its bills. It is decided collectively, in an extraordinary general meeting, by the majority required in the articles of association, and it can be organised from abroad by written consultation, videoconference or proxy if the articles allow it, which the articles of a SAS, the flexible French simplified joint-stock company, almost always do.

Two situations require a different track. If the company cannot pay its due debts with its available assets, meaning it is in cessation des paiements, French for insolvency, voluntary dissolution is forbidden in practice: the company must be placed under a court-supervised insolvency procedure instead. The Commercial Code creates that procedure for exactly this case: “Il est institué une procédure de liquidation judiciaire ouverte à tout débiteur mentionné à l’article L. 640-2 en cessation des paiements et dont le redressement est manifestement impossible” (Article L. 640-1 of the Commercial Code). Attempting a friendly dissolution while insolvent does not make the debts disappear; it exposes the director to personal liability for having hidden the insolvency and delayed the mandatory court filing. If there is any doubt about solvency, have an accountant certify it before the shareholders vote, and keep that certificate in the file.

The second special track concerns the single-shareholder company owned by another company, a very common structure for foreign groups with a French subsidiary. In that case there is no liquidation at all: the dissolution transfers the whole estate directly to the sole shareholder through a mechanism called transmission universelle du patrimoine, universal transfer of assets and liabilities, usually shortened to TUP. The Civil Code states: “En cas de dissolution, celle-ci entraîne la transmission universelle du patrimoine de la société à l’associé unique, sans qu’il y ait lieu à liquidation” (Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code). This shortcut is fast and cheap, but it carries a creditor trap that has caught many foreign parents. Creditors can block the transfer: “Les créanciers peuvent faire opposition à la dissolution dans le délai de trente jours à compter de la publication de celle-ci” (Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code). Note carefully that this shortcut is reserved for sole shareholders that are legal entities; the Code adds: “Les dispositions du troisième alinéa ne sont pas applicables aux sociétés dont l’associé unique est une personne physique” (Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code). If you hold the French company directly as an individual, you go through the full liquidation described below, even alone.

The creditor trap is not theoretical. In July 2026 the Economic Activities Court of Nanterre dealt with a French SAS dissolved by its new foreign sole shareholder with a planned transfer of all assets to a German company, while a French creditor holding an unpaid order to pay for portage salarial invoices objected within the thirty-day window (Tribunal des activités économiques de Nanterre, 6th chamber, 22 July 2026, No. 2026F00607, official decision). The court accepted the objection in full: “Dit la SAS [H] recevable et bien fondée en son opposition contre le transfert universel de patrimoine de la SAS [R] au profit de la SDE BHM EUROPÄISCHE BETEILIGUNGEN UG”. It then froze the whole operation, ordering: “Suspend les effets de la dissolution/TUP de la SAS [R] au profit de la SDE BHM EUROPÄISCHE BETEILIGUNGEN UG en date du 22 janvier 2026, publié le 13 février 2026, jusqu’à l’exécution de l’ordonnance d’injonction de payer du 31 décembre 2025 et le paiement par [R] des créances d'[H]”, and even ordered the company put back on the register: “Ordonne la réinscription d'[R] au registre du commerce et des sociétés de Nanterre”. A foreign group that planned a quiet two-month exit ended up re-registered, condemned to pay, and liable for additional damages and costs. The lesson for you: before voting a TUP from abroad, list every creditor, pay or secure the disputed amounts, and only then publish.

B. What are the exact steps that take your company off the French register?

Once dissolution is chosen for a solvent multi-shareholder company, or a company held by an individual, the procedure follows a fixed sequence, and each step leaves a public trace. Understanding the sequence matters because from abroad you will delegate most of it to a lawyer, an accountant and a formalities agent, and you need to know what to demand from each of them. The shareholders first vote the early dissolution and appoint a liquidator, who is usually the former president of the SAS or the gérant, the manager, of the SARL, but can also be an outside professional. The Civil Code sets the rule: “Le liquidateur est nommé conformément aux dispositions des statuts. Dans le silence de ceux-ci, il est nommé par les associés ou, si les associés n’ont pu procéder à cette nomination, par décision de justice” (Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code). From that moment the company enters liquidation automatically: “La société est en liquidation dès l’instant de sa dissolution pour quelque cause que ce soit” (Article L. 237-2 of the Commercial Code). Its name must from then on be followed by the words société en liquidation, company in liquidation: “Sa dénomination sociale est suivie de la mention ” société en liquidation “” (Article L. 237-2 of the Commercial Code). Every letter, invoice and email sent during the winding-up must carry that mention; forgetting it misleads third parties and can engage the liquidator’s liability.

The dissolution must then be published, because an unpublished dissolution does not exist for outsiders. The Commercial Code is explicit: “La dissolution d’une société ne produit ses effets à l’égard des tiers qu’à compter de la date à laquelle elle est publiée au registre du commerce et des sociétés” (Article L. 237-2 of the Commercial Code). In practice your representative files the minutes of the meeting, the liquidator’s acceptance and ID, and an announcement for a legal gazette through the Guichet unique, the single online window run by the INPI, the French intellectual property and companies office, which replaced the old separate filing centres. The greffe examines the file and registers the dissolution on the company’s RCS entry; the Kbis extract then shows the company as in liquidation. Expect the greffe to reject incomplete files for classic reasons: missing proof of the registered office address, an expired ID of the liquidator, or articles of association that do not allow the chosen voting method. Each rejection costs two to four weeks, which is why the file should be reviewed before uploading rather than after a refusal. Our foundation guide to creating the company describes the same window and the same registrar logic from the other direction, and remains the best map of the actors involved (Setting Up a Company in France as a Foreign Founder: Bank Account, Kbis, VAT and Your First Hire).

The liquidation phase is the liquidator’s work, and it has a legal minimum content. The law first defers to your own articles: “Sous réserve des dispositions du présent chapitre, la liquidation des sociétés est régie par les dispositions contenues dans les statuts” (Article L. 237-1 of the Commercial Code). Where the articles are silent, a default statutory regime applies, which can also be imposed by a court at the request of shareholders holding at least five percent of the capital in an SARL or joint-stock company, or at the request of the company’s creditors (Article L. 237-14 of the Commercial Code). Concretely the liquidator collects receivables, sells inventory and equipment, terminates contracts, dismisses employees in due form, pays creditors in their legal order of priority, and files the ongoing tax and social declarations. If the liquidation lasts more than one financial year, which happens often when a lease or a dispute drags on, the liquidator must report yearly: “Le liquidateur, dans les trois mois de la clôture de chaque exercice, établit les comptes annuels au vu de l’inventaire qu’il a dressé des divers éléments de l’actif et du passif existant à cette date et un rapport écrit par lequel il rend compte des opérations de liquidation au cours de l’exercice écoulé” (Article L. 237-25 of the Commercial Code). The shareholders must be convened at least once a year to approve those interim accounts.

The closing itself requires three final acts, and all three can be done without you flying to France. The liquidator draws up the final liquidation accounts, the shareholders meet a last time to approve them, grant the liquidator a quitus, a formal discharge, record the closure of liquidation and decide how to share any remaining cash, and the closure is filed with the greffe and announced, leading to the radiation, the strike-off, on the RCS. The final Kbis shows the company struck off, and only then does the legal personality end. The Civil Code states the endpoint precisely: “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation jusqu’à la publication de la clôture de celle-ci” (Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code). If anything remains after repaying the nominal value of shares, the surplus, called boni de liquidation, is shared in proportion to holdings unless the articles say otherwise: “le partage des capitaux propres subsistant après remboursement du nominal des actions ou des parts sociales est effectué entre les associés dans les mêmes proportions que leur participation au capital social” (Article L. 237-29 of the Commercial Code). That surplus is taxable in your hands, so coordinate with a tax adviser before distributing. The law also sets an outer limit: if closure has not happened within three years of dissolution, the public prosecutor or any interested party can ask the court to take over or finish the liquidation: “Si la clôture de la liquidation n’est pas intervenue dans un délai de trois ans à compter de la dissolution, le ministère public ou tout intéressé peut saisir le tribunal, qui fait procéder à la liquidation ou, si celle-ci a été commencée, à son achèvement” (Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code). A liquidation that drifts is therefore not just expensive; it can be taken out of your hands.

One of the most counter-intuitive points for foreign owners is that striking the company off the register does not bury pending disputes. The Cour de cassation confirmed this forcefully in a 20 September 2023 ruling concerning an SARL dissolved amicably on 31 December 2017 and struck off the trade register on 11 October 2018, whose former landlord sued for unpaid commercial rent, charges and restoration of the premises (Cass. com., 20 September 2023, Nos. 21-14.252 and 22-21.718, official decision). The court of appeal had declared the company’s appeal void for lack of legal existence; the Cour de cassation quashed that reasoning outright: “Il résulte de ce texte que la personnalité morale d’une société dissoute subsiste aussi longtemps que ses droits et obligations à caractère social ne sont pas liquidés”. Because the lease dispute showed that rights and obligations arising from the lease might not have been fully settled, the dissolved and struck-off company legally survived for the needs of that case, despite its radiation. The practical message runs both ways. Your former landlord or supplier can still sue the dissolved company after strike-off if something was left unsettled, and symmetrically, your dissolved company can still defend itself and appeal through a court-appointed representative. Never treat radiation as an amnesty: settle the lease, collect or formally write off receivables, and document everything before the final meeting.

II. What debts, taxes and claims can still reach you after the company is gone?

A. Which bills must be settled before you walk away: landlord, employees, URSSAF, VAT and corporate tax?

Closing from abroad fails most often on the same point: the owner files the dissolution while five files remain open, and each of them can freeze or reopen the procedure. Go through them in order, from the most expensive to the most technical. First, the commercial lease. Most French companies trade under a bail commercial, the protective 3/6/9 commercial lease, and leaving the premises does not end the lease by itself. Notice must be served by bailiff with at least six months before the end of a three-year period, the premises must be returned in the agreed condition, and the landlord can claim restoration costs, unpaid rent and charges for years. The 2023 Cour de cassation case above is exactly that story: congé given in May 2016, dissolution in December 2017, radiation in October 2018, and still a condemnation for rent and restoration, litigated through appeal and cassation into 2023. If you hold such a lease, read our guide written for owners abroad before serving anything (Your French Company Signed a 3/6/9 Commercial Lease and You Live Abroad: Deposit, Rent, Renewal and How to Exit Early). Negotiate an early surrender, a résiliation amiable, against return of the deposit, and get it in writing; it is almost always cheaper than litigating restoration.

Second, the employees. Dissolution does not terminate employment contracts by itself; each contract must be ended through a proper dismissal on economic grounds, with notice, severance and individual notifications, or through mutually agreed departures. Even with a single employee, the paperwork must be exact, because an employee dismissed without the correct procedure can claim unfair dismissal damages against the company in liquidation, and the liquidator must pay. If the company is insolvent, the AGS, the French wage guarantee fund, advances the unpaid wages, then chases the company, and scrutinises the directors. From abroad, the classic mistake is to stop paying salaries while the liquidation drags on; that creates criminal exposure for the director and personal claims that survive the company. Dismiss early, pay everything owed including accrued holiday and the attestation for the unemployment office, and close the payroll accounts with URSSAF.

Third, the social and tax administrations, which never forget a company. URSSAF, which collects employer social contributions, must be paid up to the last payslip, and the final DPAE-linked filings closed. For VAT, the company files its last returns and, where relevant, claims or repays credits; for corporate tax, called IS for impôt sur les sociétés, dissolution triggers an immediate settlement. The Tax Code provides: “l’impôt sur les sociétés est établi dans les conditions prévues aux 1 et 3 de l’article 201” in cases including dissolution (Article 221 of the General Tax Code), which means the final profit is assessed at once under the cessation rules. Those rules require taxpayers under the real-profit regime to send the administration their final profit declaration with a summary of the income statement “dans un délai de soixante jours” of the event (Article 201 of the General Tax Code), and to notify the administration of the cessation within forty-five days. Miss these windows and the assessment is made automatically, d’office, which is invariably worse. Your accountant should prepare a pre-closure tax balance: corporate tax on the final year plus any latent gains triggered by the liquidation, VAT position, local business tax apportionment, and withholding on any distribution to a foreign shareholder under the applicable treaty. Keep the funds for these bills inside the company until the liquidator pays them; distributing the cash first and discovering the tax bill later is the most common route to a director being asked to pay personally.

Fourth, your own position as director or shareholder-guarantor. Two personal traps deserve a paragraph each. If you signed a caution, a personal guarantee, for the company’s bank loan or lease, and most foreign directors of small French companies have, the creditor can pursue you directly even after the company is liquidated; closing the company never extinguishes your personal guarantee. Our guide on challenging and managing that guarantee should be read alongside this article (Your French Company Asked You for a Personal Guarantee and You Live Abroad: How to Fight or Delay the Bank). Separately, a director who continued trading while insolvent, hid the insolvency to attempt a friendly dissolution, paid one creditor to the detriment of others, or emptied the company before closing faces an action for personal contribution to the company’s shortfall and, in serious cases, a ban on managing. The defence is documentation: dated accounts, the solvency certificate before the dissolution vote, proof that all creditors were treated equally, and minutes recording every decision. If you received dividends shortly before the closing, expect the liquidator or a creditor to examine whether they were taken from real distributable profits; our tax and dividends guide explains the mechanics and the treaty relief for distributions to shareholders abroad (Your French Company Voted Dividends and You Live Abroad: Withholding Tax, Treaty Relief and How to Bring the Money Home).

B. How do you challenge a creditor, tax bill or URSSAF claim that blocks the closing from abroad?

Even a well-prepared closing meets objections, and from abroad you need a method for each type. Start with the private creditor who files an opposition, the scenario of the Nanterre case above. The law does not give the creditor a veto; it gives the creditor a judge. Where opposition is filed, “Une décision de justice rejette l’opposition ou ordonne soit le remboursement des créances, soit la constitution de garanties si la société en offre et si elles sont jugées suffisantes” (Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code). In practice your lawyer has three moves: demonstrate the claim does not exist or is not yet due, pay it to clear the path where the amount is small, or offer a guarantee such as a bank guarantee or escrow for the disputed amount and ask the court to lift the freeze. The Nanterre creditor won because its claim rested on an enforceable payment order and the debtor offered nothing; a debtor who consigns the disputed sum usually keeps its timetable. Never ignore an opposition served on the company: a default judgment will suspend the transfer, re-register the company and add damages, exactly as it did there.

Tax and social claims follow their own tracks, and each has short deadlines that run even if you are abroad. A corporate tax reassessment arrives as a proposition de rectification, a detailed notice you must answer within thirty days before any court action; the proper response is a reasoned written reply with documents, drafted by a tax specialist, because most reassessments are reduced or dropped at this stage when the reply is solid. If the assessment becomes final, the routes are an administrative claim, then the administrative court, with strict two-month windows. Our walkthrough of audits for owners living abroad details each step and the documents to gather (Tax Audit on Your French Company While You Live Abroad: Notice, Duration, Reassessment and How to Contest). URSSAF works similarly: formal notice by mise en demeure, then a mandatory prior appeal to the commission de recours amiable, then the judicial social court, each with its own deadline counted in weeks or months. The amounts URSSAF claims on closure, late payslips, undeclared benefits in kind, director’s fees reclassified as salary, are negotiable in part through reductions of surcharges when payment follows quickly, so do not let the file sit while you are away; give your representative a standing instruction to forward every registered letter within forty-eight hours.

Organise the whole closing as a remote project with a realistic timetable and budget. A clean dissolution and liquidation of a small company with no employees and no dispute takes four to nine months; add three to twelve months for each complication, a lease dispute, an employee, a tax audit, an opposition. The indicative out-of-pocket costs for a simple file run from roughly two thousand to five thousand euros, covering legal announcements, greffe fees, accounting for the final balance and counsel, before any tax or creditor payments. Give powers of attorney early: the liquidator, whether that is you or a professional, needs a French postal address for service, access to the bank accounts, and authority to sign filings on the Guichet unique. Foreign documents, such as a passport or a foreign parent company’s powers, sometimes need an apostille or legalised translation, so start that paperwork before the first meeting rather than after the greffe asks. Hold the shareholders’ meetings by videoconference with written minutes signed electronically, keep every proof of publication, and never distribute the remaining cash until the accountant confirms in writing that tax, VAT and social charges are fully provided for. If a dispute erupts mid-liquidation that you cannot fund, consider converting to a sale of the company as-is with full disclosure, or, where insolvency appears, filing for court protection immediately rather than finishing an amiable liquidation that the law forbids in that state.

Conclusion

Closing a French company from abroad is a procedure, not a disappearance. Vote the dissolution only once solvency is certified and the choice against a share sale is deliberate; appoint a liquidator who will actually do the work; publish each step through the Guichet unique and the BODACC until the strike-off appears on the RCS; and treat the landlord, the employees, URSSAF, VAT and corporate tax as mandatory stops on the way, not as afterthoughts. The case law of 2022, 2023 and 2026 delivers the same warning from three angles: a seller remains exposed on its warranties long after the shares are gone, a dissolved company legally survives as long as its affairs are unsettled, and a creditor who objects in time can freeze a transfer and force the company back onto the register. Respect the thirty-day, forty-five-day and sixty-day windows, keep the money for the final bills inside the company, document every decision, and challenge each hostile claim through its proper channel instead of ignoring it. Done this way, the closing ends with a clean Kbis de radiation, a struck-off extract that proves the adventure is over, and no letter from Paris following you home.

Need a quick opinion on your case.

Closing a French company, facing a creditor opposition, a lease dispute or a final tax bill from abroad? Our firm offers a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or reach us through our contact page for a first assessment of your file and the immediate steps to protect your interests.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

kader ladjouzi
8 hours ago

Best real estate and business law attorney in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
4 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.