Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

My Husband Died in France After Brexit: Can His British Widow Keep the Family Home? Share, Usufruct, Deadlines and Challenges

Your husband has died in your French home. The funeral is barely over when the practical questions arrive all at once: can you stay in the house, what share of the estate is legally yours, and what happens if his children from a first marriage want their money now? For a British widow or widower living in France after Brexit, these questions are answered by French succession law, not by English law and not by the family arrangement you may have assumed. France gives a surviving husband or wife two distinct protections that work side by side: a share of the estate that depends on whose children survive, and a protected right to remain in the family home. Both protections come with strict deadlines, written formalities and traps for blended families. This guide explains each of them in the order you will meet them: first, the share you take and how gifts already received reduce it; second, the one free year in the home and the lifetime right that follows it; third, how the children can ask a judge to convert your usufruct into money and how you resist; and finally, the deadlines, the paperwork a British survivor needs and the tax position. Every decisive rule is quoted from the Civil Code, the Tax Code or a judgment of the Cour de cassation, and every French term is explained as it appears.

I. My husband died in France: what share do I inherit and can I stay in our home?

A. The quarter in ownership or the whole in usufruct: your share depends on whose children survive

French law starts from a simple distinction that surprises many British families. When the person who died leaves children, the surviving husband or wife, called the conjoint survivant in French, does not automatically inherit half of everything. The Civil Code provides that “le conjoint survivant recueille, à son choix, l’usufruit de la totalité des biens existants” (article 757 of the Civil Code), meaning the survivor may choose the usufruit, or usufruct, of the whole estate. An usufruct is the right to use property and to take its income, rents or harvests, while the nue-propriété, or bare ownership, belongs to someone else, usually the children, who recover full ownership when the usufruct ends. The alternative offered by the same article is ownership of one quarter of the estate, but only “lorsque tous les enfants sont issus des deux époux”, that is, when every surviving child is the child of both spouses.

That last condition is the decisive one for blended families, which are common among British couples settled in France. Where the deceased leaves even one child who is not the child of both spouses, there is no choice at all. The Cour de cassation stated the rule plainly in a 2025 judgment: “si l’époux prédécédé laisse un ou plusieurs enfants qui ne sont pas issus des deux époux, le conjoint survivant recueille la propriété du quart des biens existants” (Cour de cassation, First Civil Chamber, 5 March 2025, appeal no. 23-11.430). In that case a widower had left a daughter born of an earlier relationship alongside his wife, and the wife’s family argued that she had taken the whole estate in usufruct. The Court quashed the appeal judgment and held that “les droits légaux du conjoint survivant ne pouvaient être que de la propriété du quart des biens existants, sans faculté d’option pour l’usufruit de la totalité de ces biens”, meaning her legal share could only be ownership of one quarter, with no option for a usufruct over the whole. If your late husband had children from a first marriage or a first relationship, your intestate share, the share the law gives you when there is no will, is therefore fixed at one quarter in full ownership, and no one can argue you into a whole-estate usufruct you never chose.

A will or a gift between spouses, called a donation entre époux, can improve on these legal minimums, but only within a ceiling the Code calls the disposable portion between spouses. Article 1094-1 allows a husband or wife who leaves children to give the other “soit de la propriété de ce dont il pourrait disposer en faveur d’un étranger, soit d’un quart de ses biens en propriété et des trois autres quarts en usufruit, soit encore de la totalité de ses biens en usufruit seulement” (article 1094-1 of the Civil Code). In ordinary language, your husband could leave you the largest of three packages: whatever he could leave a stranger, or one quarter in ownership plus three quarters in usufruct, or the whole estate in usufruct. Many British couples signed a French gift between spouses at the notaire’s office years ago without realising it, so ask the notaire settling the estate, called the notaire in every French succession, to search for one before you accept any figure the family puts to you.

Whatever you were given during the marriage or by the will is then set against your legal share. The Code states that “Les libéralités reçues du défunt par le conjoint survivant s’imputent sur les droits de celui-ci dans la succession.” (article 758-6 of the Civil Code), which means every lifetime gift and every legacy from your husband counts towards your entitlement and is deducted from it. If what you received is less than your legal rights, you may claim the difference, but you can never take home more in total than the disposable portion between spouses. The calculation itself is done on an enlarged pot, because the Code directs that the survivor’s ownership right be computed on all property existing at death plus anything the deceased gave away to other heirs without exemption from bringing it back into account: “Le conjoint ne pourra exercer son droit que sur les biens dont le prédécédé n’aura disposé ni par acte entre vifs, ni par acte testamentaire” (article 758-5 of the Civil Code), so lifetime gifts to the children shrink what is left for you to take your quarter from.

The Cour de cassation confirmed how strict this setting-off is in a 2022 case that will feel familiar to many British stepfamilies. A widower had left his wife a specific legacy of a house, furniture and money, while his two daughters came from an earlier marriage. The widow argued she could keep both the legacy and her full legal quarter. The Court rejected the argument, holding that “le conjoint survivant est tenu à un rapport spécial en moins prenant des libéralités reçues par lui du défunt dans les conditions définies à l’article 758-6” (Cour de cassation, First Civil Chamber, 12 January 2022, appeals nos. 19-25.158 and 20-10.091). In practice the legacy is credited against your quarter, and the ordinary presumption that legacies are extra, found in article 843, does not help a surviving spouse. There is, however, a useful piece of flexibility inside article 1094-1 itself: “le conjoint survivant peut cantonner son émolument sur une partie des biens dont il a été disposé en sa faveur”, which means you may limit, or ring-fence, what you take from a gift to only some of the assets offered, for example keeping the house and refusing the rest, and that refusal is not treated as a gift to the other heirs. A British widow who has been left the whole estate in usufruct by her husband’s will can therefore confine her usufruct to the family home, which often calms the dispute with his children while keeping her housed.

B. Staying in the family home: one free year, then a lifetime right you must claim in time

Alongside your share of the estate, French law gives you two rights that concern the roof over your head, and they apply whether or not you inherit anything else. The first is immediate and automatic. Where you were actually living in the home as your main residence at the time of death, and the home belonged to both spouses or entirely to the estate, the Code provides that “il a de plein droit, pendant une année, la jouissance gratuite de ce logement” (article 763 of the Civil Code), a full year of free use of the home and the furniture in it. If you rented the home, the succession refunds your rent for that year as you pay it. These one-year rights are unusually strong: the Code declares that “Les droits prévus au présent article sont réputés effets directs du mariage et non droits successoraux.”, meaning they flow directly from the marriage itself rather than from the inheritance, and it adds that “Le présent article est d’ordre public.”, so no will and no family agreement can take them away. For the first twelve months, nobody, not even children who technically own the walls, can make you pay to stay or force you out.

The second right is longer but must be claimed. Unless your husband deprived you of it in a will drawn up in the strict formal manner the Code requires, a survivor who was actually occupying the home as a main residence at death holds “a sur ce logement, jusqu’à son décès, un droit d’habitation et un droit d’usage sur le mobilier” (article 764 of the Civil Code), a right of habitation over the home until your own death plus a right of use over the furniture in it. A droit d’habitation is a personal lifetime right to live in the dwelling; unlike an usufruct, you cannot sell it or give it away, though the Code lets you, if the home no longer suits your needs, “peut le louer à usage autre que commercial ou agricole”, that is, let it for non-commercial and non-agricultural use to fund a more suitable home. The deprivation by will is the exception, not the rule, and it leaves any usufruct you hold untouched, since the statute keeps each right under its own regime. Either you, the children or any one of them may also insist “qu’il soit dressé un inventaire des meubles et un état de l’immeuble”, that a formal inventory of the furniture and a condition report of the building be drawn up, which protects you against later claims that you damaged or removed anything.

The trap, and the one that has destroyed real cases, is the deadline for claiming the lifetime right. The Cour de cassation has held that “le conjoint survivant dispose d’un an à partir du décès pour manifester sa volonté de bénéficier de son droit viager au logement” (Cour de cassation, First Civil Chamber, 13 February 2019, appeal no. 18-10.171). You have one year from the death to make known your wish to take the lifetime habitation right. The same judgment adds that “cette manifestation de volonté peut être tacite”, that your expression of will may be implied rather than written, but relying on silence is a gamble no British survivor should take, because in that very case the widow’s vague letter stating she wished to keep the flat in accordance with the law was judged too imprecise. The safe course is a short, dated, written declaration to the notaire settling the succession, sent by a traceable method within the first months, stating that you claim your lifetime right of habitation and use under article 764. Keep a copy with proof of sending, because the children who want the house sold will be watching the calendar. Our companion guide to the first steps after a death in France explains how the succession is opened and proved: My Husband Died in France: First Steps, Succession Opening and How to Challenge.

II. Can the children force me out or convert my usufruct, and what tax will I pay?

A. Conversion into an annuity or a lump sum: who can demand it and how to resist it

Children who have inherited the bare ownership often dislike waiting. They own the walls but cannot sell the house or live in it while your usufruct lasts, so French law offers them a way out called conversion, the transformation of your usufruct into a lifetime annuity, called a rente viagère, or into a capital sum. The Code provides that every usufruct held by a spouse over the deceased’s property, whether it comes from the law, a will or a gift of future property, “donne ouverture à une faculté de conversion en rente viagère, à la demande de l’un des héritiers nus-propriétaires ou du conjoint successible lui-même” (article 759 of the Civil Code). In other words, either the children or you yourself may ask for the usufruct to be swapped for regular payments for life. You might welcome that yourself if you would rather move back to Britain and live on an income than remain tied to a house in the Dordogne, but you should never accept a conversion figure proposed across the kitchen table without advice, because the annuity must reflect the true rental value of what you give up.

Where everyone agrees, the conversion can take the form of a lump sum instead of an annuity: “Par accord entre les héritiers et le conjoint, il peut être procédé à la conversion de l’usufruit du conjoint en un capital.” (article 761 of the Civil Code). Any such agreement should be drawn up by the notaire, state the valuation method used for the usufruct, usually a percentage of full ownership that falls as your age rises, and record the securities for payment, because a promise of capital from children who then sell the house and spend the proceeds is worth little. Where there is no agreement, the request goes to the judge, and the Code sets two boundaries that protect you. First, the application “Elle peut être introduite jusqu’au partage définitif.” (article 760 of the Civil Code), meaning it can be brought at any time up to the final division of the estate, so delay alone does not defeat the children, but once the partage, the final partition deed, is signed, the door closes. The judge who grants conversion fixes the amount of the annuity, the guarantees the debtor children must provide and the indexation that keeps the payments equivalent to the usufruct over time. Second, and crucially for a widow still living in the home, “le juge ne peut ordonner contre la volonté du conjoint la conversion de l’usufruit portant sur le logement qu’il occupe à titre de résidence principale”, so the court cannot force conversion of the usufruct over the dwelling you occupy as your main residence, nor over the furniture in it, against your will. A British widow living in the French family home therefore holds a veto over the forced conversion of that home’s usufruct for as long as it remains her principal residence. Moving back to the United Kingdom permanently before the dispute is settled can weaken that shield, so take advice on timing before you give up the house.

The same logic applies to the lifetime habitation right. The survivor and the heirs may “peuvent, par convention, convertir les droits d’habitation et d’usage en une rente viagère ou en capital” (article 766 of the Civil Code), that is, convert those rights by agreement into a lifetime annuity or a capital sum, and where a minor or a protected adult is among the parties the family council’s judge must authorise the deal. Note the difference: unlike the usufruct, the habitation right can never be converted by a judge against your wishes; it takes your signature. If the children press you to sign, ask for three things before you even discuss figures: a current valuation of the home by an independent agent, a calculation of the rental value you are surrendering, and the draft conversion deed from the notaire showing the guarantees. A common error is to sign a private letter agreeing in principle to leave in exchange for a sum that is never secured. Challenge an unfair conversion by refusing to sign, by writing to the notaire that you maintain your rights under articles 759 to 761 and 766, and, if proceedings are issued, by asking the court to verify the valuation, the indexation and the securities, and by invoking the protection of the main home where you still live there.

Two further defences deserve mention because they decide many Franco-British files. First, the ring-fencing described earlier lets you confine a testamentary usufruct to the home alone, which removes the children’s incentive to seek conversion of everything else. Second, where the numbers show your legal quarter has been eaten away by lifetime gifts to the children, the enlarged calculation mass of article 758-5 can restore it: insist the notaire produce the full statement of gifts, the relevé des libéralités, and check that each gift to a child without exemption from return has actually been added back before your quarter is computed. If the notaire refuses or the children hide gifts, a summons to take a position and an application to the court for disclosure and provisional payments are the standard procedural answers, and they are developed in our guide to contested successions and English wills in France: British Resident in France With an English Will: Choice of Law, Forced Heirship and the Notaire Process.

B. Deadlines, paperwork and tax: the four months to choose, the exemption from death duties, and the documents a British survivor needs

Three clocks run at once after the death, and a British survivor who misses them pays for it. The first is the general inheritance option. The Code provides that “L’héritier ne peut être contraint à opter avant l’expiration d’un délai de quatre mois à compter de l’ouverture de la succession.” (article 771 of the Civil Code), meaning no heir can be forced to accept or refuse the estate during the four months after it opens. After that period a creditor, a co-heir or the State can serve you with a formal demand to take your position, and you then have a short further period to accept, refuse or accept under benefit of inventory, the procedure that limits your liability for the deceased’s debts to what the estate contains. For a surviving spouse the practical point is simple: use those four months to gather information instead of signing anything, and if the estate may be in debt, ask the notaire about acceptance under benefit of inventory before the formal demand arrives. The second clock is the one-year period for claiming the lifetime right in the home, explained above, and the third is the limitation period for bringing claims arising from the partition, which makes early written positions valuable.

The tax news, at least, is good. French death duties, called droits de mutation par décès, do not touch what passes between husband and wife. The Tax Code states that “Sont exonérés de droits de mutation par décès le conjoint survivant et le partenaire lié au défunt par un pacte civil de solidarité.” (article 796-0 bis of the General Tax Code). Whatever you inherit from your husband, whether a quarter in ownership, a usufruct or a lifetime habitation right, bears no French inheritance tax in your hands. That exemption does not remove the duty to declare. The succession must still be declared to the tax office within the statutory time limit, currently six months from death where the death occurred in France, through the notaire’s declaration of succession, and penalties and interest for late filing apply even where no tax is due from you. Tell the notaire immediately about any British assets, English bank accounts and any United Kingdom estate administration, so the French declaration and the British side are consistent; the interaction with the British tax authority is a matter for coordinated advice, and you should not sign a French declaration that omits assets the British side will later reveal.

As a British national, you will be asked for documents a French widow is never asked to produce, so prepare them early. The notaire will normally want the death certificate, your marriage certificate and birth certificates, any English will with a sworn French translation, proof of your matrimonial property regime, and evidence of who owns the French home and under what title. Certificates issued in the United Kingdom generally need an apostille, the international authentication stamp, and translation by a sworn translator, called a traducteur assermenté, before a French notaire or court will rely on them. Our guide to proving civil status with British documents explains the apostille and translation chain: it is linked from the first-steps guide above. If your husband left an English will, its interaction with your French rights must be read together with the European succession rules on choice of law, which is why the English-will pillar cited above should be read alongside this article rather than instead of it. The United Kingdom government’s own living-in-France guidance is also worth consulting for the administrative side of bereavement abroad: Living in France: official United Kingdom guidance, and the French administration’s own pages describe the spouse’s housing rights in French: Droits du conjoint sur le logement du défunt (service-public.fr).

If the family blocks you, the procedure is graduated. Start with a recorded delivery letter to the notaire asserting your one-year housing rights, your four-month reflection period and your requirement for a full statement of gifts, and keep copies of everything. If the notaire will not act or the children change the locks, sell furniture or market the house over your head, instruct counsel to issue a summons before the judicial court, the tribunal judiciaire, seeking confirmation of your habitation right, an inventory under seal where needed, provisional maintenance payments and penalties for obstruction. Conversion applications by the children are answered in the same forum: oppose the valuation, demand proper securities and indexation, and rely on the main-home protection for as long as you genuinely live there. Every application has its own time limit, so the earlier a lawyer sees the death certificate, the will, the title deed and the notaire’s correspondence, the more of these defences remain open.

Conclusion

A British widow or widower in France is far from powerless, but every protection has a clock attached. Where all the children are yours together, choose deliberately between the whole estate in usufruct and the quarter in ownership; where any child comes from another relationship, the law fixes your share at the quarter in ownership, and lifetime gifts to the children are credited against it with no cumulation beyond the disposable portion between spouses. You enjoy a free year in the family home that no will can remove, and a lifetime habitation right that you must claim in writing within a year of the death. The children may ask to convert your usufruct into an annuity or capital, but they cannot force conversion of the home you live in as your main residence, and the habitation right can only be converted with your signature. You pay no French death duties on what you inherit, yet the declaration must still be filed on time and must include the British side of the estate. Put your claim in writing to the notaire in the first weeks, gather the apostilled and translated British documents, check for a gift between spouses you may have forgotten, and challenge valuations and conversion figures before you sign anything. Taken in that order, the French rules do what they were designed to do: keep the surviving spouse housed, paid and heard, even when the family around the table speaks with two accents.

Need a quick opinion on your case.

A telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm, to review your share, your right to stay in the home and the deadlines running against you before you sign or give up anything. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22.

Or write to us through our contact page with the death certificate, the title deed, any will and the notaire’s letters: we will tell you quickly what you can claim, what to refuse to sign and how to challenge an unfair valuation or conversion.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
2 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.