Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Closing Your French Company From Abroad: How to Dissolve and Liquidate a SAS or SARL, Pay What You Owe and Get Struck Off

You created a French company from abroad, ran it for a while, and now the project is over, pivoting, or moving to another country. Closing the company is not a single form. French law organises the shutdown in two distinct legal steps, dissolution first and liquidation second, each with its own vote, its own filing on the Guichet unique (the single online company formalities portal run by the INPI, the French intellectual property and companies office), and its own publication. Foreign owners who stop filing returns, empty the bank account, and walk away do not close anything. The company remains registered, tax notices keep coming, and the director remains exposed. This guide explains how to dissolve and liquidate a SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or a SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company with stricter statutory rules) entirely from abroad, what to do with employees, leases, creditors and the bank, and how to get the final strike-off published so the adventure really ends.

French company law applies the same two-step logic to both vehicles, with differences in majority rules that come from your articles of association for a SAS and from the statute for a SARL. The first step, dissolution, puts the company into liquidation but does not kill it. As Article L237-2 of the Commercial Code states, “La société est en liquidation dès l’instant de sa dissolution pour quelque cause que ce soit”, and the same article adds that “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation, jusqu’à la clôture de celle-ci”. In plain terms, the company survives as a legal person only to be wound up. Its name must then be followed by the words signalling that state, since the article continues: “Sa dénomination sociale est suivie de la mention ” société en liquidation “”. The second step, liquidation, sells the assets, pays the creditors, and shares out what is left before the company is struck off the Registre du commerce et des sociétés, the RCS or trade and companies register kept by the greffe (the registry office of the commercial court). If you already know the formation side of the story, our pillar guide on setting up a company in France as a foreign founder: bank account, Kbis, VAT and first hire describes the Kbis (the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe), the bank account and the VAT registration that you will now unwind in reverse order.

Two practical warnings before the detail. First, this article covers the voluntary, solvent shutdown, called dissolution-liquidation amiable, decided by the shareholders while the company can still pay its debts. If the company cannot pay, you must not run an amicable liquidation. French law requires a declaration of cessation of payments and a court-led insolvency procedure instead, which is a different matter with different deadlines and personal risks. Second, closing from abroad is possible but never automatic. Every filing passes through the Guichet unique, publications run in a journal d’annonces légales (a legal announcements newspaper, usually called JAL, where company events must be advertised) and in the BODACC (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the official gazette where registrations and strikes-off are published), and the greffe checks each step. A shareholder living in London, New York, or Dubai votes remotely, signs with a compliant electronic signature, and appoints a representative in France where physical presence is needed, but the steps themselves cannot be skipped.

I. VOTE THE EARLY DISSOLUTION AND ENTER LIQUIDATION WITHOUT LOSING CONTROL OF THE PROCESS

Dissolution is the legal decision that ends the company’s active life and opens the winding-up period. Liquidation is the operations phase that follows. Confusing the two is the most common mistake foreign owners make: they vote one resolution, file one form, and believe the company is gone, when the register still shows it as active and in liquidation. The discipline of the shutdown is to treat each phase separately, document it, and publish it, because as Article L237-2 of the Commercial Code provides, “La dissolution d’une société ne produit ses effets à l’égard des tiers qu’à compter de la date à laquelle elle est publiée au registre du commerce et des sociétés”. Until publication, creditors and counterparties can still treat the company as a going concern, and the directors’ liability continues.

A. How foreign shareholders vote an early dissolution, appoint the liquidator and make it binding on third parties

The standard case is an early voluntary dissolution, which the Civil Code lists among the ways a company ends. Article 1844-7 of the Civil Code provides that “La société prend fin : 1° Par l’expiration du temps pour lequel elle a été constituée”, and continues with “4° Par la dissolution anticipée décidée par les associés”, which is the voluntary route this guide describes. The decision belongs to the shareholders, not to the director alone, and the majority depends on the vehicle. In a SARL, dissolution follows the majority required to amend the articles, and the appointed liquidator may be the manager, a shareholder, or an outsider. In a SAS, the articles of association set the majority and the procedure, because the SAS is built on contractual freedom within the framework of Article L227-1 of the Commercial Code, while the SARL follows the protective template of Article L223-1 of the Commercial Code. Foreign owners should therefore read their own articles before calling the vote: a SAS whose articles require unanimity for dissolution cannot be closed on a simple majority, and a SARL cannot invent a lighter procedure than the statute allows. The English-language official procedure published by the administration confirms this split between vehicles and explains who can serve as liquidator, and it is worth reading before drafting the resolutions: cessation of a business, voluntary dissolution, official English procedure. The INPI portal page describing the same steps is also useful: closing a company, dissolution and strike-off, INPI.

From abroad, the vote itself is organised like any shareholder decision: convene according to the articles, allow remote participation if the articles permit it, document the quorum and the majority, and sign minutes that state three things expressly, the dissolution, the appointment of the liquidator with the scope and duration of the mandate, and the registered office of the liquidation, which is often the former registered office or the liquidator’s address. Where the company has a single shareholder, the same person records the decision in writing as sole shareholder, and no meeting formalities apply beyond proper documentation. One special case deserves attention because it changes everything: where all the shares end up in one hand, the Civil Code offers a shortcut without liquidation. Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code states that “En cas de dissolution, celle-ci entraîne la transmission universelle du patrimoine de la société à l’associé unique, sans qu’il y ait lieu à liquidation”. This is the transmission universelle de patrimoine, universally called TUP, where the whole estate passes to the sole shareholder. Creditors are protected by a right to object, since the same article provides that “Les créanciers peuvent faire opposition à la dissolution dans le délai de trente jours à compter de la publication de celle-ci”. If you are a foreign sole shareholder hoping for the shortcut, calendar that thirty-day window from publication, because the transfer only becomes effective once the opposition period has run or the court has dealt with objections, as the article’s full text explains.

Once voted, the dissolution must be published to bind third parties. The liquidator handles the filings: publication of a dissolution notice in the JAL, filing of the dissolution on the Guichet unique with the minutes, the updated details, and the supporting documents, then registration by the greffe and publication in the BODACC. The Commercial Code puts the burden on the liquidator personally. Article L237-3 of the Commercial Code provides that “L’acte de nomination du liquidateur est publié par celui-ci, dans les conditions et délais fixés par décret en Conseil d’Etat, qui détermine également les documents à déposer en annexe au registre du commerce et des sociétés”, and adds that the public prosecutor or any interested person can ask the court to order the liquidator to publish, if necessary under a penalty. In practice, the Kbis of the company changes at this point: the same legal person continues, but the Kbis now shows the liquidation status and the liquidator’s name, and every letter, invoice, and contract must carry the words société en liquidation after the company name. Bank branches, suppliers, and the tax office check the Kbis, so a company that forgets the mention looks irregular and invites suspicion. The administration’s English page walks through the filing sequence and the supporting documents for each vehicle, and it should be treated as the checklist for this phase: official voluntary dissolution procedure in English.

Paris and Ile-de-France add a practical layer rather than a different law. If the registered office sits in Paris, the competent greffe is the Paris commercial court registry, filings run through the same Guichet unique, and the JAL must be a newspaper authorised for the Paris department. Foreign owners often keep a Paris address through a domiciliation company after leaving France, and that contract should be maintained until the strike-off is published, because the greffe, the tax office, and the liquidator need a valid French address for service throughout the liquidation. Terminating the domiciliation too early means missing a creditor’s letter or a court notice, which is how quiet liquidations turn into disputes. Keep one channel open in France until the very end.

B. How the liquidation runs: sell the assets, pay the creditors and keep the company alive only for winding up

Liquidation is an operations phase with a single legal purpose: convert the assets into cash, pay the debts, and distribute the remainder. Unless the articles say otherwise, the statute governs. Article L237-1 of the Commercial Code states that “Sous réserve des dispositions du présent chapitre, la liquidation des sociétés est régie par les dispositions contenues dans les statuts”, which means the articles lead but the mandatory chapter on liquidation always applies. The liquidator represents the company, realises the assets, pays creditors in their rank, and answers to the shareholders, who keep their meeting rights during the whole period. The courts take this survival of the legal person seriously. In a decision frequently cited on the point, the Metz Court of Appeal recalled that “Il résulte des dispositions combinées des articles L237-2 et L237-9 du code de commerce que la personnalité morale de toute société subsiste pour les besoins de sa liquidation, jusqu’à la clôture de celle-ci, laquelle suppose que les associés sont convoqués en fin de liquidation pour statuer sur le compte définitif, sur le quitus de la gestion du liquidateur et la décharge de son mandat et pour constater la clôture de la liquidation”, a passage worth reading in full in the Metz Court of Appeal decision of 11 February 2025, RG 21/02030, available on the Cour de cassation database. The lesson for a foreign owner is concrete: as long as the closure is not voted and published, the company can still sue and be sued, sign settlements, and receive tax notices, and the liquidator is the only person who can act for it.

The liquidator’s first tasks are an inventory, a creditor map, and a cash plan. On the asset side, the liquidator sells stock, collects receivables, terminates or assigns contracts, and deals with the lease. A point foreign owners often miss is that the commercial lease survives the dissolution. Article L237-5 of the Commercial Code provides that “La dissolution de la société n’entraîne pas de plein droit la résiliation des baux des immeubles utilisés pour son activité sociale”, so the landlord cannot be told the lease simply vanished, and the liquidator must either negotiate an early exit, assign the lease with the landlord’s consent where required, or keep paying rent until the premises are properly surrendered. On the liabilities side, the liquidator pays in order: employees first with their protected wage claims, then secured and preferential creditors, then unsecured suppliers, then shareholder current accounts, which rank last. Shareholder loans that foreign founders injected as compte courant d’associé (shareholder current account, the flexible loan a shareholder makes to the company) are not repaid before outside creditors. Draining the account the week before dissolution to recover the loan is exactly the kind of payment a court can revisit, and a creditor or a later insolvency practitioner can challenge.

Employees and contracts require the same discipline. If the French company still employs staff, the liquidator must run proper dismissal procedures with genuine reasons linked to the closure, respect notice and severance, inform and consult staff representatives where they exist, and file the social declarations through the DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly online payroll and social declaration) until the last payslip. The URSSAF (the social security collection agency that audits payroll and contributions) does not disappear because the shareholders live abroad, and unpaid contributions follow the company into liquidation and can reach the director personally in case of fault. Customer and supplier contracts must each be read individually: some terminate on dissolution, some require notice, some impose penalties, and regulated contracts may need prior authorisation to transfer. The liquidator should send clear written notices, in French, recording the dissolution, the liquidation address, and the invitation to declare claims, and should keep proof of every sending. Foreign owners managing this by email from another time zone should insist on a weekly written report from the liquidator with a creditor table, a cash balance, and a list of pending filings. A liquidation without a paper trail is a dispute waiting for a forum.

Duration matters. An amicable liquidation has no fixed statutory length in the general case, but it must not drift. The Civil Code sets a backstop that every foreign owner should know. Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code provides that “Si la clôture de la liquidation n’est pas intervenue dans un délai de trois ans à compter de la dissolution, le ministère public ou tout intéressé peut saisir le tribunal, qui fait procéder à la liquidation ou, si celle-ci a été commencée, à son achèvement”. A liquidation sleeping past three years invites a court to take over, which costs money and control. During the period, the liquidator must also report annually. Article L237-25 of the Commercial Code requires the liquidator to draw up annual accounts and a written report on the operations of the year, and to convene the shareholders at least once a year to approve them, failing which the report is filed with the greffe and open to inspection. A foreign shareholder who never asks for these annual meetings learns about problems only when it is too late. Calendar them.

II. CLOSE THE BOOKS, GET STRUCK OFF AND SETTLE THE FRENCH TAX AND SOCIAL TAIL FROM ABROAD

Closing is the second vote, the mirror of the first. The shareholders approve the liquidator’s final accounts, give quitus (the formal discharge of the liquidator for the management of the winding-up), record the end of the liquidation, and ask for the strike-off. Each of these words has a legal meaning, and the greffe checks that the sequence was followed before it deletes the company from the register. Foreign owners should treat this phase as a second full transaction, with its own meeting, its own publication, and its own filing, rather than as a rubber stamp on work already done.

A. How to approve the final accounts, close the liquidation and obtain the strike-off from the trade register

The closing meeting is convened by the liquidator at the end of the operations. Article L237-9 of the Commercial Code provides that “Les associés, y compris les titulaires d’actions à dividende prioritaire sans droit de vote, sont convoqués en fin de liquidation pour statuer sur le compte définitif, sur le quitus de la gestion du liquidateur et la décharge de son mandat et pour constater la clôture de la liquidation”. Three separate resolutions therefore appear in the minutes: approval of the final account, discharge of the liquidator, and formal recording of the closure. If a shareholder refuses to attend or to approve, the text organises a fallback, since the same article adds that “A défaut, tout associé peut demander en justice la désignation d’un mandataire chargé de procéder à la convocation”. And where the closing meeting cannot resolve or refuses the accounts, the court decides. Article L237-10 of the Commercial Code states that “Si l’assemblée de clôture prévue à l’article L. 237-9 ne peut délibérer ou si elle refuse d’approuver les comptes du liquidateur, il est statué, par décision de justice, à la demande de celui-ci ou de tout intéressé”. For a foreign-owned company with shareholders in several countries, these fallbacks matter: a minority shareholder living abroad cannot block the closure forever, but forcing the issue through the court takes months, so negotiating the final distribution before the meeting is always cheaper than litigating it afterwards.

The distribution itself, called boni de liquidation (the liquidation surplus left after all debts are paid), follows the articles and the contributions of each shareholder. In a SAS, the articles may organise unequal distributions or priority returns. In a SARL, the statute frames the process more tightly, and the capital structure described at formation in Article L223-1 of the Commercial Code and for the SAS in Article L227-1 of the Commercial Code determines who gets what. The liquidator pays the surplus against tax clearance certificates and proof that all creditors were satisfied or secured, because distributing while a known debt remains unpaid exposes the liquidator and the shareholders who received funds. Before signing the closure minutes from abroad, a foreign shareholder should demand three documents: the final liquidation balance sheet, a certificate or sworn statement from the liquidator that all known creditors were paid or provisioned, and the tax and social clearance position described in the next section. Approving accounts without these papers is approving blind.

Once the closure is voted, the publication and filing sequence repeats a second time. The liquidator publishes a closure notice in the same JAL, files the closure on the Guichet unique with the closing minutes, the final accounts, and the updated forms, and the greffe registers the closure and publishes the radiation, the strike-off, in the BODACC. Only that BODACC publication ends the company’s opposability to third parties. Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code states the rule plainly: “Elle n’a d’effet à l’égard des tiers qu’après sa publication”, and adds that “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation jusqu’à la publication de la clôture de celle-ci”. Keep the proof of each filing, each JAL affidavit, and each BODACC notice in one closing binder, in French, because a bank closing the last account, a landlord releasing a deposit, or a tax office auditing the final year will each ask for a different piece of that chain. The INPI guide to the procedure lists the filings in order and the portal to use: closing a company, dissolution and strike-off, INPI. Foreign owners should also download and archive the final Kbis showing the radiation, since some foreign banks and tax authorities ask for it years later when the former shareholder opens an account or declares the capital gain at home.

Two traps close this section. The first is the forgotten creditor who appears after the distribution. French law does not let shareholders keep the surplus against an unpaid creditor whose claim predates the closure, and the creditor can act against the former shareholders within the limits of what each received, and against the liquidator in case of fault. The second trap is the asset discovered after closure, a receivable nobody collected, a deposit never reclaimed, a tax refund issued late. Reopening requires a court-appointed mandatary, which costs more than the asset is often worth. The prevention is a closing checklist signed by the liquidator: bank accounts identified and closed or transferred, deposits reclaimed, receivables collected or formally abandoned with reasons, tax refunds claimed, archives designated with a named keeper and address, since company records must remain available for the statutory retention periods. A closure voted without that checklist is a closure built on hope.

B. How to settle the tax, VAT, payroll and banking tail that foreign owners forget before leaving

The company being wound up stays a taxpayer until the strike-off. The liquidator files the final corporate income tax return covering the liquidation period, settles the last VAT returns and asks for the VAT registration to be closed, pays the CFE (cotisation foncière des entreprises, the annual local business tax) for the year of activity where due, and handles payroll filings to the last payslip. Our earlier guides on corporate income tax returns, payments and penalties from abroad and on VAT registration, representatives, returns and penalties from abroad describe each of these obligations during the company’s active life, and every one of them has a final version at closure. The practical point for a foreign owner is that the Guichet unique filing does not automatically close the tax files. The liquidator must separately inform the tax office of the cessation, file the final returns, and request the tax clearance, because the company remains liable for late-filing penalties until each file is formally closed. Keep a French correspondence address and a French-speaking contact until the tax office confirms in writing that the files are closed.

The distribution of the surplus has its own tax layer. The boni de liquidation is not a dividend like the others. It is taxed in the hands of the shareholders under specific rules that combine withholding where applicable, personal or corporate taxation depending on who receives it, and the tax treaty between France and the shareholder’s country of residence for foreign recipients. A foreign individual shareholder and a foreign parent company face different treatments, different forms, and different reclaim procedures, and the treaty may reduce or reallocate the French tax. The liquidator should obtain a written tax computation before distributing, withhold where the rules require it, and give each foreign shareholder the French tax certificates needed to claim treaty relief at home. Distributing the cash first and asking the accountant later reverses the safe order and leaves the liquidator personally short if the tax office disagrees with the treatment. Where the shareholder is a foreign company, the transfer-pricing and parent-subsidiary history should also be reviewed before closure, because a liquidation does not cleanse past years from audit, and closing the company does not close the audit window for the years it traded.

On the social side, the last payroll must be perfect. The final DSN must show the last employment contract ending with the correct reason, the final payslips must be issued and paid, the attestation France Travail (the employer’s certificate that lets the former employee claim unemployment benefits) must be delivered, and the solde de tout compte (the final settlement receipt signed at the end of any employment contract) must be prepared. The URSSAF can audit a closed company within its standard look-back years, and assessments reach the liquidator or, after strike-off, the former representatives. Foreign founders who paid themselves as président (the chairman-like executive of a SAS, affiliated to the general social security scheme) or as gérant (the manager of a SARL, whose social regime depends on majority status) should check that all executive contributions were declared and paid to the end of the mandate, because gaps in the last quarters are the classic finding of post-closure audits. Our guide to director status, pay, social security and liability from abroad explains these regimes during the company’s life, and the same logic applies to the final months.

The bank account stays open until the end, and that surprises many foreign owners who close it early to simplify. The liquidator needs an account to collect the last receivables, pay the last creditors, receive the JAL and greffe refunds if any, and distribute the surplus by traceable transfer. Closing the account before the distribution forces awkward private payments that blur the line between company money and personal money. The right sequence is to keep one account for the liquidation, convert it where needed to an account in liquidation, remove remote-management limits so the liquidator can actually operate it, and close it only after the surplus is distributed and the final tax payments have cleared. For Paris-based companies, the bank branch that opened the account usually wants the dissolution Kbis, the liquidator’s identity documents, and the closing minutes before it releases the full balance, and each of these papers must match the names and addresses on the register exactly. A mismatch between the Kbis, the JAL notice, and the bank’s file freezes the money for weeks, which is why the exact company name with the words société en liquidation must appear identically on every document from day one.

Conclusion

Closing a French SAS or SARL from abroad is a two-vote, two-publication, two-filing operation, and each half has the same weight. The dissolution vote opens the liquidation, appoints the liquidator, and must be published before it binds third parties, because as Article L237-2 of the Commercial Code states, “La dissolution d’une société ne produit ses effets à l’égard des tiers qu’à compter de la date à laquelle elle est publiée au registre du commerce et des sociétés”. The liquidation then sells, collects, and pays in the right order, remembering that the lease survives dissolution and that shareholder loans rank behind outside creditors. The closing vote approves the final account, discharges the liquidator, and records the end, following the procedure of Article L237-9 of the Commercial Code, and the strike-off only takes effect once published, since Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code provides that “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation jusqu’à la publication de la clôture de celle-ci”. Around that spine, the foreign owner must keep a French address until the BODACC publishes the radiation, file the last tax, VAT, and social returns separately from the company formalities, compute the tax on the liquidation surplus before distributing a euro, and keep the bank account open until the last payment clears. Done in this order, the shutdown ends the Kbis, the tax files, the payroll files, and the bank relationship together, and the archived closing binder proves it years later. Done in reverse, with the account emptied and the returns abandoned, the company survives on paper and the liabilities survive with it.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9279 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
1 month ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
2 months ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
6 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
7 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

Jean-pierre Steinmetz
2 days ago

De très bons conseils donnés par Maître Cornu lors de notre entretien du 16 octobre.

John Roberts
3 days ago

Service très professionnel et réactif. L’avocat a rapidement et attentivement vérifié la validité du titre de séjour de mon épouse au regard d’un régime juridique particulier. Son travail nous a apporté des éclaircissements, alors que les démarches administratives habituelles étaient longues et ambiguës. J’ai apprécié son efficacité et son professionnalisme, et je recommande ses services.

Jean-François PAPA
1 week ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
1 week ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
2 weeks ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
2 weeks ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
2 weeks ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
2 weeks ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Faiza Traduction
12 hours ago
Alain Arsaut
3 days ago

Vu Hassan au JT

Beaudrique Abao
3 days ago
Krep Events Traiteur Breton
1 week ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
1 week ago
emilie lepicard
2 weeks ago
Zakaria Airbnb
2 weeks ago
إبراهيم عيسى
2 weeks ago