Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Subsidiary Owes Corporate Tax While You Live Abroad: 25% Rate, Advance Payments, Filing and Penalties

You formed a company in France, you run it from London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, and the first profitable year is closing. Sooner or later the same question lands in your inbox: how does French corporate tax work when the director lives abroad, when does the money leave the account, what return has to be filed, and what happens if a deadline slips while you are thousands of kilometres away. This guide answers those questions in one place. It is written for the foreign founder and the foreign parent company, it explains every French acronym as it goes, and every decisive rule below is quoted from the statute or the court decision that states it, with a link to the official text so you can check it yourself.

French corporate tax is called impot sur les societes, usually shortened to IS. It is the tax a French company pays on its own annual profit, at a headline rate of 25 percent, through a system of four advance payments during the year called acomptes, followed by a return and a final balance called the releve de solde. The company pays it itself, from its French bank account, on the French tax calendar, whether its shareholders and directors live in Paris or on another continent. Distance changes nothing about the due dates, but it changes everything about organisation: the notices arrive in French, the online accounts require French identifiers, and the penalties for a missed filing apply exactly as they would to a company whose director sits next to the accountant. The companion walkthrough that covers the whole creation sequence, from the blocked capital to the Kbis extract (the official company identity card issued by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court), the VAT number and the first hire, is the natural starting point if you have not read it yet, and this article takes over exactly where it stops: setting up a company in France as a foreign founder, from bank account to Kbis, VAT and first hire. Read together, the two pieces cover the birth of the company and the first full tax cycle of its life.

I. Your French Company Owes Corporate Tax: Who Pays and What the 25 Percent Rate Means

A. Which companies are liable for French corporate tax when the owner lives abroad

The starting point is simple: a French company is taxed in France because it is French, not because its owner lives in France. The general tax code, the Code general des impots universally shortened to CGI, states that “sont passibles de l’impôt sur les sociétés, quel que soit leur objet, les sociétés anonymes, les sociétés en commandite par actions, les sociétés à responsabilité limitée n’ayant pas opté pour le régime fiscal des sociétés de personnes” (article 206 of the Code general des impots). In plain English, public limited companies (SA, societe anonyme), simplified joint-stock companies (SAS, societe par actions simplifiee, which follows the SA regime for tax purposes), and limited liability companies (SARL, societe a responsabilite limitee) are liable for corporate tax whatever their business is, unless they have validly chosen the partnership tax regime. If you incorporated a SAS or a SARL through the one-stop shop, the Guichet unique run by the INPI (the Institut national de la propriete industrielle, the French intellectual property and business formalities office), your company entered this regime automatically on the day of its registration, and your residence abroad does not move that liability one millimetre.

Two frequent misunderstandings deserve to be cleared up immediately. First, the fact that the shareholders are foreign, that the capital came from abroad, or that the customers are outside France does not exempt the French company. Territoriality in French corporate tax turns on where the business is operated, and a company registered with a French registered office (siege social), filing French accounts and holding a French SIREN number (the unique identification number issued by INSEE, the national statistics institute), is a French taxpayer for its profits. Second, losses do not cancel the compliance calendar: a company that makes no profit still has to file, still has to keep books, and still has to be ready to prove its deficit, because a deficit carried forward is a tax asset the administration can examine later. The accounting duty itself is not a tax rule but a commercial one: “Elle doit établir des comptes annuels à la clôture de l’exercice au vu des enregistrements comptables et de l’inventaire” (article L. 123-12 of the Commercial Code). Every merchant, individual or company, must record movements chronologically, check assets and liabilities by inventory at least once every twelve months, and draw up annual accounts comprising the balance sheet, the profit and loss account and the notes, which form an inseparable whole. From abroad, this means one practical obligation above all: keep a French chartered accountant (expert-comptable) who closes the books on time, because every tax deadline below runs from the closing date of the financial year (exercice) that only proper accounts can establish.

The branch of a foreign company, called a succursale, is a halfway case worth one paragraph. A branch has no legal personality of its own: it is the foreign company acting in France. It is taxed in France on the profit attributable to its French activity, it must keep accounts that isolate that activity, and it files in France, but the assessment technically attaches to the foreign head office through the branch. A subsidiary (filiale), by contrast, is a fully French company owned by a foreign parent: it is taxed exactly like a company owned by French residents, it distributes dividends under French withholding rules, and its director’s foreign residence changes nothing about its obligations. Most foreign founders who intend to stay and grow choose the subsidiary, usually a SAS, and accept the full French compliance calendar in exchange for limited liability and a clean separation of assets. That calendar is the subject of the rest of this article, and its first line is the rate.

B. The 25 percent rate: what profit it applies to and what it costs in practice

The headline is one short sentence of statute: “Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %” (article 219 of the Code general des impots). The normal rate of corporate tax is set at 25 percent. It applies to the taxable profit (benefice imposable), which is the accounting profit corrected by tax rules: some charges are added back, some deductions are capped, and some income follows special rates. A foreign director should understand three corrections that surprise newcomers. Client entertainment, fines and penalties of any kind are never deductible. Interest paid to related parties, typically to the foreign parent that lent money to the French subsidiary, is deductible only within caps and rates set by statute, and the excess is added back to taxable profit. And provisions, the accounting reserves for doubtful debts or future litigation, are deductible only if the loss is precisely identified and probable at the closing date, a point the tax courts police strictly, as the litigation section below shows. None of this requires you to become a tax technician; it requires you to send every material contract, loan and dispute to your accountant before the year closes, not after, because corrections made after closing are corrections made too late.

In cash terms, 25 percent means that a company earning 100,000 euros of taxable profit owes 25,000 euros of corporate tax for the year, before social contributions on distributed profits and before any withholding on dividends paid to the foreign shareholder, which are separate layers. Small companies benefit from a reduced 15 percent rate on the first 42,500 euros of profit when their turnover stays below 10 million euros and their capital is held mostly by individuals, a relief worth knowing but one whose conditions must be checked year by year rather than assumed. Long-term capital gains on qualifying participations follow their own special rates under the same article 219, which is why the sale of shares in a subsidiary is a transaction to plan with advice, not to improvise. The point of this article is not to optimise the base but to make the payment mechanics fail-safe from abroad, so keep one number in mind as you read on: every euro of taxable profit costs the company twenty-five cents of tax, payable in five movements, four advances and one balance, on dates the statute fixes to the day.

One more cost habit to build early: corporate tax is only one of the French levies on a company, and foreigners sometimes confuse it with the others. VAT (TVA, taxe sur la valeur ajoutee) is collected on sales and reclaimed on purchases; it is the company’s customers and suppliers who economically bear it, and it follows its own returns. The territorial economic contribution (CFE, cotisation fonciere des entreprises, with its companion CVAE now being phased out) is a local business tax due every year even without profit, with its own December deadline. Social charges on salaries are collected by URSSAF (the Unions de recouvrement des cotisations de securite sociale et d’allocations familiales, the social security collection agencies) on their own monthly or quarterly rhythm. Corporate tax sits on top of none of these and replaces none of them; it is the annual tax on the profit that remains after all of them have been accounted for. Missing any one of these calendars triggers its own penalties, which is why the foreign director’s real job is not to master each tax but to make sure each tax has an owner, a date and a payment method before the year starts.

II. Paying and Filing Corporate Tax From Abroad: Deadlines, Interest and How to Challenge

A. Advance payments, tax return and balance: the dates that trigger interest when missed

French corporate tax is not paid once a year after the return; it is prepaid in four instalments and settled afterwards. The statute provides that “L’impôt sur les sociétés donne lieu au versement, au comptable public compétent, d’acomptes trimestriels déterminés à partir des résultats du dernier exercice clos” (article 1668 of the Code general des impots). Corporate tax gives rise to quarterly advance payments to the competent public accountant, calculated from the results of the last closed financial year. The same article fixes the payment dates without ambiguity: “Les paiements doivent être effectués au plus tard les 15 mars, 15 juin, 15 septembre et 15 décembre de chaque année” (article 1668 of the Code general des impots). Payments must be made no later than 15 March, 15 June, 15 September and 15 December of each year. Each instalment is roughly one quarter of the tax computed on the previous year’s result, and the total of the four is set against the final tax for the current year when the return is filed. If the advances exceed the final tax, the excess is refunded or carried forward; if they fall short, the company pays the balance with the return. For a founder living abroad, the practical translation is blunt: four direct debits or wire transfers must leave a funded French account on four fixed dates, and the person who checks that the account is funded cannot be someone who discovers the deadline the day before.

The first year of existence is the one exception, and it is generous: “Les sociétés nouvellement créées ou nouvellement soumises, de plein droit ou sur option, à l’impôt sur les sociétés sont dispensées du versement d’acomptes au cours de leur premier exercice d’activité” (article 1668 of the Code general des impots). Newly created companies are exempt from advance payments during their first financial year. The whole first-year tax is therefore paid in one balance with the first return, which helps cash flow at the exact moment the company is also funding its capital deposit, its lease guarantee and its first salaries. From the second year on, the ordinary rhythm applies automatically, and a profitable first year mechanically produces large advances in the second, a cash shock that surprises many foreign founders who assumed the tax would wait for the return. The defence is a forecast: as soon as the first year’s profit becomes visible, provision the second year’s four instalments in the treasury plan, and consider modulating them downwards if the current year is clearly turning worse, a procedure the online tax account allows under conditions your accountant knows.

The return itself follows the closing of the accounts. The statute requires that “la déclaration du bénéfice ou du déficit est faite dans les trois mois de la clôture de l’exercice” (article 223 of the Code general des impots). The declaration of profit or deficit is made within three months of the closing of the financial year. The same article adds the rule most companies actually live under: “Si l’exercice est clos le 31 décembre ou si aucun exercice n’est clos au cours d’une année, la déclaration est à déposer au plus tard le deuxième jour ouvré suivant le 1er mai” (article 223 of the Code general des impots). If the year closes on 31 December, the return must be filed no later than the second working day after 1 May. In practice this is the familiar early-May deadline, filed electronically as form 2065 with its appendices, together with the financial statements, and it is the return that computes the final tax and the balance due after crediting the four advances. Everything is filed and paid online through the company’s espace professionnel on impots.gouv.fr (the official portal of the French tax administration, the Direction generale des finances publiques), which means the foreign director needs working login credentials, a French bank account configured for SEPA direct debit (prelevement SEPA), and a person mandated to click before the deadline, because a return prepared but not transmitted is a return not filed.

Late payment, even by days, has a price that runs automatically. The statute provides that “Le taux de l’intérêt de retard est de 0,20 % par mois” (article 1727 of the Code general des impots). The late-payment interest rate is 0.20 percent per month. The same article fixes the computation period: “L’intérêt de retard est calculé à compter du premier jour du mois suivant celui au cours duquel l’impôt devait être acquitté jusqu’au dernier jour du mois du paiement” (article 1727 of the Code general des impots). Interest runs from the first day of the month following the month the tax should have been paid until the last day of the month of payment. At 0.20 percent per month, a 25,000 euro balance paid three months late costs 150 euros of interest, which looks modest until the surcharges below are added, and until the same delay repeats on advances, VAT and social charges in parallel. Interest is not a penalty for bad faith; it is the automatic price of time, and it runs even when the delay was an honest mistake, a bank rejection or an accountant’s oversight. The only reliable protection is a calendar with alerts set one month, one week and one day before each of the five annual movements, held by two people, one of whom can pay.

B. Late filing, reassessment and penalties: the three-year window and your defences from abroad

Failing to file the corporate tax return is treated more severely than paying late, and the machinery is designed to force the taxpayer back into compliance. The Livre des procedures fiscales, the LPF (the code of tax procedure that governs audits, assessments and disputes), provides for automatic assessment: “à l’impôt sur les sociétés, les personnes morales passibles de cet impôt qui n’ont pas déposé dans le délai légal leur déclaration” are taxed automatically (“Sont taxes d’office”) (article L. 66 of the Livre des procedures fiscales). Companies liable for corporate tax that have not filed their return within the legal deadline are assessed automatically. Taxation d’office, automatic assessment, means the administration computes the tax itself from the information it holds, without the taxpayer’s return, and the taxpayer who wants to contest must then prove the assessment is excessive, a reversal of the burden of proof that makes disputes painful. Before that stage, the administration sends a formal demand (mise en demeure) by registered letter, and the surcharge scale that follows is mechanical. The statute punishes “Le défaut de production dans les délais prescrits d’une déclaration” with a surcharge of 10 percent without a formal demand or with filing within thirty days of it, and 40 percent when the return is still not filed thirty days after the demand (article 1728 of the Code general des impots). An 80 percent surcharge applies where a hidden activity (activite occulte) is discovered, the situation of a company operating without ever registering or declaring, which a foreign-run company must never allow itself to approach.

The courts apply this scale without sentiment, and a Paris case every foreign director should know shows why organisation beats excuses. A service company, SARL 6eme Sens, filed its corporate tax return for the year ended 31 May 2013 only on 15 May 2015, more than thirty days after receiving a formal demand on 18 July 2014, and the administration applied the 40 percent surcharge. The administrative court of appeal confirmed: “L’administration était dès lors fondée à appliquer à l’imposition litigieuse la majoration de 40 % prévue au b du 1 de l’article 1728 du code général des impôts, sa bonne foi alléguée étant sans incidence sur le bien-fondé de la pénalité contestée” (CAA Paris, 24 November 2020, no. 19PA00931). The administration was therefore entitled to apply the 40 percent surcharge, and the company’s alleged good faith had no bearing on the validity of the penalty. Two lessons follow for a director living abroad. First, good faith does not erase the surcharge: neither distance, nor a change of accountant, nor ignorance of French wakes the administration’s mercy, because the penalty attaches to the objective fact of late filing after a demand. Second, the same judgment upheld the rejection of a provision for a doubtful debt because the circumstances making the loss probable had to be assessed at the closing date, not with later documents, which confirms that tax evidence is frozen at year-end and that post-closing justifications rarely save a deduction. File on time, close cleanly, document at closing: the whole strategy fits in one sentence.

The administration’s power to look back is bounded, and the boundary is three years. The procedure code states: “Pour l’impôt sur le revenu et l’impôt sur les sociétés, le droit de reprise de l’administration des impôts s’exerce jusqu’à la fin de la troisième année qui suit celle au titre de laquelle l’imposition est due” (article L. 169 of the Livre des procedures fiscales). For corporate tax, the administration’s right to reassess runs until the end of the third year following the year for which the tax is due. The same article extends the window to ten years where the taxpayer carries on a hidden activity or receives distributions from a company that does, which is the legal reason never to let registration, filing or disclosure lapse: compliance buys the short limitation period, and opacity buys the long one. Within the three-year window the administration may audit the accounts (verification de comptabilite), issue a proposed rectification (proposition de rectification) that the company can answer within thirty days, and then assess additional tax with interest and surcharges. From abroad, the thirty-day answer period is the dangerous one: the letter arrives at the French registered office or in the online account, the director is travelling, and silence at this stage becomes consent in practice. The fix is procedural, not legal: designate a French address that is actually read, activate electronic notification, and instruct the accountant in writing that every administrative letter is forwarded within forty-eight hours with a proposed reply.

Interest, once assessed, survives payment of the principal, a point a recent Lyon decision confirms with unusual clarity. A trading company that had paid its corporate tax in full challenged additional late interest of about 10,000 euros put in collection afterwards, arguing that the collection notice lacked detail and that the interest was time-barred under the three-year reassessment rule. The court rejected both arguments, holding that no statute required the administration to detail the interest computation in the collection notice, and that “La SARL Domaine Bernard Delagrange et Fils ne peut utilement se prévaloir du délai de reprise prévu par les dispositions précitées pour faire échec à l’application des intérêts de retard complémentaires mis en recouvrement après le paiement intégral des droits d’impôt sur les sociétés” (CAA Lyon, 20 February 2025, no. 24LY01643). The company could not rely on the reassessment time limit to defeat additional late interest collected after the tax itself had been fully paid. For the foreign director the message is practical: paying the principal late does not close the file, a supplementary interest notice can follow, and it must be challenged, if at all, on its own grounds and within its own appeal deadlines, starting with an administrative claim (reclamation) to the tax office that issued it, then an appeal to the administrative court (tribunal administratif) if the claim is rejected expressly or implicitly after six months. Every step can be taken from abroad through a representative with a written mandate (mandat), and hearings can often be handled in writing, but the deadlines themselves never bend for distance.

Three defences are genuinely available, and each has a form and a deadline. The administrative claim must generally be filed by 31 December of the second year following the assessment or collection, must state the facts and the legal grounds, and suspends enforced collection only if paired with a request for suspension and, usually, guarantees. Where the dispute turns on a provision, a related-party charge or a valuation, the winning file is the contemporaneous one: contracts, invoices, bank statements and board minutes dated from the year at issue, not reconstructions prepared for the audit. Where the surcharge is the issue, the record of the formal demand matters: was it sent, was it received, was the return filed within thirty days, because those three facts decide between 10 and 40 percent mechanically. And where the company genuinely cannot pay, a payment plan (plan de reglement) or a request for remission of surcharges (remise gracieuse) can be filed with the local tax office, which may grant time or mercy but never owes either. None of these steps requires the director to fly to Paris; all of them require the director to know, within days, that a letter arrived. The companies that lose from abroad are rarely the companies with the weakest legal case; they are the companies that learned about the case too late.

Conclusion

A French subsidiary owned from abroad pays corporate tax like any French company: 25 percent on its taxable profit, four advances on 15 March, 15 June, 15 September and 15 December computed from the last closed year, a return within three months of closing and no later than the second working day after 1 May for calendar-year companies, and a balance with the return. The first year is exempt from advances, which helps cash flow once and never again. Missed payments accrue interest at 0.20 percent per month automatically, missed returns trigger 10 or 40 percent surcharges after a formal demand with good faith counting for nothing, persistent silence leads to automatic assessment with the burden of proof reversed, and the administration has until the end of the third year after the tax year to reassess, ten in cases of hidden activity. The two court decisions quoted above were both lost by companies that filed or paid too late and argued too generally; the companies that win are the ones whose books close on time, whose French account is funded before each fixed date, and whose accountant forwards every letter within days. Distance is not a defence in French tax procedure, but organisation is a complete one: give each of the five annual movements an owner, a funded account and a double alert, keep the evidence of each year inside that year, and answer every administrative letter within thirty days. Run this way, a French company directed from abroad pays exactly what it owes, when it owes it, and keeps the administration’s attention where it belongs: on someone else’s file.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
4 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
5 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
1 week ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
2 weeks ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
6 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
6 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
2 weeks ago
إبراهيم عيسى
2 weeks ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago