Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Direct Your French Company From Abroad: Social Regime, URSSAF Bill and Salary vs Dividends

You live in London, Dubai or New York and you have just been appointed president of your new French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose), or manager of a SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the French limited liability company). The company is registered, the Kbis (the official identity card of a French company, issued by the greffe, the clerk’s office of the commercial court) is in your inbox, and then a letter arrives from URSSAF (the union for the collection of social security contributions and family allowances, the body that collects French social charges). It speaks of affiliation, contributions and a bill to pay, even though you drew no salary and you do not live in France. This article answers the two questions every foreign director asks at that moment: which French social regime covers you, and what does it really cost you, salary against dividends. The starting point is the company itself, described in our guide to setting up a company in France as a foreign founder. The rest follows from statutes verified on 18 October 2026 and two court decisions of 2025 that draw the exact line between the regimes.

I. Which French social regime covers you when you direct your company from abroad

A. President of a SAS or SASU: the “assimilated employee” in the general scheme

French social security affiliation does not depend on your passport or your address. Article L311-2 of the Social Security Code states: “Sont affiliées obligatoirement aux assurances sociales du régime général, quel que soit leur âge et même si elles sont titulaires d’une pension, toutes les personnes quelle que soit leur nationalité, de l’un ou de l’autre sexe, salariées ou travaillant à quelque titre ou en quelque lieu que ce soit, pour un ou plusieurs employeurs et quels que soient le montant et la nature de leur rémunération, la forme, la nature ou la validité de leur contrat ou la nature de leur statut.” In plain terms, whatever your nationality and wherever you work, a French corporate office can pull you into the French general scheme. Living abroad does not exempt you; at most, European coordination rules or a bilateral agreement may shift the answer in cross-border situations, and that point must be checked individually before you assume that French affiliation does not apply to you.

For the president of a SAS, the text that decides is article L311-3 of the Social Security Code, whose paragraph 23 provides: “23° Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et des sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées ;”. The president and the senior officers (directeurs généraux) of a SAS are therefore compulsorily affiliated to the general scheme as what French practice calls “assimilés salariés”, literally assimilated employees. No employment contract is required and none is presumed: the affiliation flows from the corporate office itself. This matches company law, since article L227-6 of the Commercial Code provides that “La société est représentée à l’égard des tiers par un président désigné dans les conditions prévues par les statuts. Le président est investi des pouvoirs les plus étendus pour agir en toute circonstance au nom de la société dans la limite de l’objet social.” The person vested with the widest powers to bind the company is also the person the social security system wants to see affiliated.

The Cour de cassation confirmed the logic from the other side on 5 June 2025 (Second Civil Chamber, appeal no. 23-13.887, decision available here). The case concerned the president of a supervisory board whose pay URSSAF had reassessed, and the Court recalled: “Selon l’article L. 311-3, 23°, du code de la sécurité sociale, dans sa rédaction applicable au litige, sont obligatoirement affiliés aux assurances sociales du régime général les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et de sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées.” It then drew the boundary: “ayant pour seule mission de contrôler les organes de direction de la société sans en assumer la gestion, les membres du conseil de surveillance ne sont en principe pas affiliés aux assurances sociales du régime général, sauf à démontrer qu’ils exercent en réalité une fonction de direction.” Supervisory board members, whose only mission is to control management without managing, are in principle not affiliated, unless URSSAF proves they actually performed a management function. Read in reverse, the lesson for a foreign founder is direct: if you actually direct the SAS, affiliation is the rule, and only a purely controlling role escapes it. In that case the Court upheld the reassessment because the person was listed in the BODACC (the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements, where company appointments are published) as a person habitually empowered to bind the company, was declared as a director on the M2 modification form, and held a decisive vote on major investments. Public filings therefore feed URSSAF controls: what you declare at the registry can be used against you in a reassessment.

The practical content of the assimilated-employee regime is described by the French administration itself: the president of a SAS is treated as an employee-equivalent covered by the general social security system, with contributions mirroring those of an executive employee except for unemployment insurance, as explained on the official service-public page on SAS social contributions. The official guidance adds the points foreign founders most often miss: since the director is not entitled to unemployment insurance, no unemployment contribution is paid, as the official service-public page on SAS social contributions explains, and contributions are computed on income actually paid and declared through the DSN. The contrast with the self-employed regime is stark: URSSAF recalls that with low or deficit income, minimal contributions remain due for basic retirement, disability and death cover, daily allowances and professional training. Concretely, an unpaid SAS president costs the company nothing in social charges on the salary track, while a paid one costs roughly what an executive employee costs, minus unemployment insurance. That zero-cost-unpaid feature is the single biggest reason foreign founders who keep their income abroad choose the SAS.

B. Manager of a SARL or EURL: majority means self-employed, minority means assimilated employee

The SARL works differently because the manager’s social regime depends on the shareholding. Article L311-3 of the Social Security Code provides in its paragraph 11: “11° Les gérants de sociétés à responsabilité limitée et de sociétés d’exercice libéral à responsabilité limitée à condition que lesdits gérants ne possèdent pas ensemble plus de la moitié du capital social, étant entendu que les parts appartenant, en toute propriété ou en usufruit, au conjoint, au partenaire lié par un pacte civil de solidarité et aux enfants mineurs non émancipés d’un gérant sont considérées comme possédées par ce dernier ;”. Only the minority or equal-share manager (gérant minoritaire ou égalitaire) joins the general scheme as an assimilated employee. The shares of a spouse, civil partner and minor children count toward the manager’s holding, so a founder who splits shares inside the family can tip into the majority without realising it. Company law confirms who the manager is: article L223-18 of the Commercial Code states that “La société à responsabilité limitée est gérée par une ou plusieurs personnes physiques.” and that “Dans les rapports avec les tiers, le gérant est investi des pouvoirs les plus étendus pour agir en toute circonstance au nom de la société, sous réserve des pouvoirs que la loi attribue expressément aux associés.”

The majority manager belongs to the independent workers’ universe. Article L611-1 of the Social Security Code opens the book on self-employed persons with: “Le présent livre s’applique aux personnes suivantes : 1° Les travailleurs non salariés qui ne sont pas affiliés au régime mentionné au 3° de l’article L. 722-8 du code rural et de la pêche maritime ;”. The contribution base follows article L131-6 of the Social Security Code: “Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues par les travailleurs indépendants non agricoles ne relevant pas du dispositif prévu à l’article L. 613-7 sont assises sur l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-3.” In practice the base is the professional income, and URSSAF specifies on its page explaining independent workers’ contributions that for associate managers of companies subject to corporate tax a share of dividends is also included in the base, and that a reform of the base and rates (Social Security Financing Act for 2024, implemented by decree in July 2024) applies from the 2025 contribution settlement. The same page warns that with low or deficit income, minimal contributions remain due for basic retirement, disability and death cover, daily allowances and professional training. The self-employed regime therefore never costs zero.

The Rennes Court of Appeal applied these rules bluntly on 14 May 2025 (RG 23/06292, decision available here) against a co-manager who argued that he had resigned years earlier. The court recalled: “Le gérant majoritaire ou faisant partie d’un collège majoritaire d’une SARL est considéré comme exerçant une activité non salariée et relève ainsi du régime de sécurité sociale des indépendants”. A resignation letter handed to a co-partner proved nothing, the court held, because the Kbis extract still showed the joint management and the legal publication formalities had never been completed. The activity is deemed to continue until the end of the calendar quarter in which it actually ends, regardless of any dormancy of the company. Then came the sentence foreign founders should memorise: “le gérant majoritaire d’une SARL est considéré comme un travailleur indépendant par la législation sociale et qu’il est tenu, même en l’absence de revenus professionnels, au paiement des cotisations forfaitaires minimales prévues par ce régime (Soc. 28 mai 1998, pourvoi n 96-20.917, Bull.,V, n° 289)”. Even with zero professional income, the majority manager owes flat minimal contributions, a solution the court traces to a 1998 Cour de cassation ruling. The judgment adds: “Il importe peu que par ailleurs il soit également affilié au régime des salariés.” Being separately affiliated as an employee elsewhere changes nothing. For a foreign founder, the message is that creating a SARL in which you hold the majority, then leaving it dormant while living abroad, still generates an annual URSSAF bill until your departure is properly published and registered.

II. What you pay, what you file and how you fight an URSSAF bill from abroad

A. Salary or dividends: the real cost comparison for a foreign founder

Once the regime is identified, the choice between paying yourself a salary (rémunération) and taking dividends is a cost comparison, and the two tracks obey different texts. Salary paid to an assimilated-employee director bears general-scheme contributions under article L242-1 of the Social Security Code: “Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues au titre de l’affiliation au régime général des personnes mentionnées aux articles L. 311-2 et L. 311-3 sont assises sur les revenus d’activité tels qu’ils sont pris en compte pour la détermination de l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-1-1 . Elles sont dues pour les périodes au titre desquelles ces revenus sont attribués.” Contributions therefore attach to the periods to which the activity income is allocated, and the company withholds and pays them through the DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly online payroll return), due by the 15th of the following month according to the official service-public guidance for SAS companies. Salary has a tax counterpart: article 62 of the General Tax Code provides that “Les traitements, remboursements forfaitaires de frais et toutes autres rémunérations sont soumis à l’impôt sur le revenu au nom de leurs bénéficiaires s’ils sont admis en déduction des bénéfices soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés par application de l’article 211 , même si les résultats de l’exercice social sont déficitaires”, for the managers it lists. A regularly voted salary is therefore deductible from the company’s corporate-tax base (IS, impôt sur les sociétés) even in a loss-making year, while generating personal income tax and full social cover for the director, except unemployment insurance.

Dividends follow the other track. Article L136-6 of the Social Security Code provides: “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B du code général des impôts sont assujetties à une contribution sur les revenus du patrimoine assise sur le montant net retenu pour l’établissement de l’impôt sur le revenu, à l’exception de ceux ayant déjà supporté la contribution au titre des articles L. 136-3 , L. 136-4 et L. 136-7 :”. Dividends are investment income (revenus de capitaux mobiliers) and, for a director who is a French tax resident, they bear the CSG (contribution sociale généralisée, the general social levy) and the CRDS (contribution au remboursement de la dette sociale, the social-debt repayment levy) on that patrimony track, on top of income tax. For the unpaid SAS president, dividends are therefore the natural way to extract profit without triggering the heavy general-scheme contributions, since no minimal contribution exists in that regime. For the majority SARL manager, the arbitrage is narrower: URSSAF includes a share of dividends in the independent worker’s base, as recalled above, so dividends partly loop back into contributions, and minimal contributions apply in any event. Non-resident founders add a third layer, withholding tax and treaty relief, which must be examined country by country and is outside the scope of this article.

In practice the decision matrix looks like this. If you direct a SAS from abroad and need no French social cover, take no salary and extract profit as dividends: the contribution cost is zero on the salary track and limited to the patrimony levies on the dividend track, subject to your country of residence. If you need French health, retirement and daily-allowance cover, vote yourself a salary, issue payslips and file the DSN: you pay executive-level contributions without unemployment cover, and the salary is deductible at company level. If you chose a SARL with a majority holding, budget for the independent worker’s contributions every year, including minimal flat amounts in zero-income years, and know that part of your dividends feeds the same base. Whatever the vehicle, two traps must be avoided: cumulating a sham employment contract with your office in the hope of gaining unemployment cover, which Pôle emploi and URSSAF examine strictly, and leaving a dormant company unmanaged, since the Rennes ruling shows that contributions run until your exit is published, not until you stop working.

B. Registration, monthly filings and challenging a reassessment from Paris or from abroad

Affiliation starts with registration: the director’s appointment is filed with the company formalities, published, and reflected on the Kbis, and URSSAF opens the collection account from those filings. The company’s payroll then runs through the DSN each month, with declaration and payment due no later than the 15th of the following month under the official service-public guidance, quarterly filing being an option for small headcounts. From abroad, the operational discipline is simple: keep the registered office address (siège social) actually monitored, because every formal notice goes there; calendar the DSN even in months with zero pay, since a missing return triggers estimates; and keep the assembly minutes that fix your remuneration, because URSSAF asks for them in every control and the Cour de cassation treated the annual fixing of pay as one indicator of real management.

When URSSAF disagrees, the procedure is written and strict. The formal notice (mise en demeure) must state its case precisely: article R244-1 of the Social Security Code provides that “L’avertissement ou la mise en demeure précise la cause, la nature et le montant des sommes réclamées, les majorations et pénalités qui s’y appliquent ainsi que la période à laquelle elles se rapportent.” Any notice that omits the cause, nature, amount or period is vulnerable. If the notice remains unpaid, article R133-3 of the Social Security Code continues: “Si la mise en demeure ou l’avertissement reste sans effet au terme du délai d’un mois à compter de sa notification, les directeurs des organismes créanciers peuvent décerner, dans les domaines mentionnés aux articles L. 133-8-7 , L. 161-1-5 ou L. 244-9 , une contrainte comportant les effets mentionnés à ces articles.” The creditor therefore has one month after notification before issuing the enforceable constraint (contrainte), which is then served by a judicial officer or notified by a means proving its date of receipt. From abroad, do not let that month expire while mail piles up at an unmonitored seat: the Rennes case shows that a notice sent to the company’s address and signed for there can be held valid as sent to the debtor’s effective correspondence address known to the fund, so an unmonitored seat is a default judgment waiting to happen.

Challenges follow three levels. First, attack the notice itself: missing cause, nature, amount, period, or surcharges, and late or irregular service. Second, attack the affiliation: for a SAS supervisory role, invoke the 2025 Cour de cassation boundary and deny any real management function, forcing URSSAF to prove actual direction rather than a bare title; for a SARL, prove minority status with the full share register including family holdings, or prove that your term ended with published filings and an updated Kbis, since a private resignation letter changes nothing on its own. Third, attack the amounts: zero-pay SAS president means zero contributions on the salary track; majority SARL manager means checking that only the proper base, including the correct dividend share, was used. For founders based in Paris and the Île-de-France region, collection is handled by the regional URSSAF and disputes go to the Paris judicial court in its social-protection division, while the company’s Kbis and published appointments come from the Paris commercial court registry; keeping those three addresses aligned, the seat, the payroll contact and the legal correspondence address, prevents most defaults. None of this requires your presence in France: a representative can file the opposition, plead from the documentary record and negotiate a schedule, provided the file is complete before the constraint is served.

Conclusion

Directing a French company from abroad does not place you outside French social security; it places you in one of two precisely defined boxes. President of a SAS, you are an assimilated employee in the general scheme, with executive-level contributions on any salary, no unemployment cover and no bill at all if you take no pay. Majority manager of a SARL, you are an independent worker, with contributions on professional income plus part of your dividends and minimal flat amounts even in zero-income years, until your exit is published. Salary buys cover and deductibility, dividends buy lightness, and the formal notice procedure gives you one documented month to react before constraint. Identify your box on the day of appointment, file accordingly every month, and meet any URSSAF letter with the texts and the 2025 decisions in hand rather than with silence from abroad.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
4 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
4 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
1 week ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
2 weeks ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
5 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
5 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
2 weeks ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago