Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Lent Money to Your French Company From Abroad: Shareholder Loan Repayment, Interest and Proof

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, your French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company with a stricter legal frame) needs cash before the first invoices are paid, and the bank will not lend to a company with no balance sheet. The natural move is to wire your own money to the company. Under French law that wire is not a gift and not equity: it is a shareholder loan, called a compte courant d’associé, a current-account advance recorded in your name in the company’s books. It can be repaid, it can bear interest, and it can destroy value if the paperwork is wrong. This guide explains how a founder living abroad funds a French company by shareholder advance, when repayment can be demanded, what interest the company may deduct, how the interest is taxed, and what proof file keeps the loan safe from recharacterisation, from a blockage dispute, and from insolvency. It complements the setup roadmap for foreign founders covering the corporate bank account, the Kbis company certificate, VAT registration and the first hire in France: once the company exists, the shareholder loan is usually its first financing.

I. Can you fund your French company with a shareholder loan while living abroad

Yes. French law places no nationality or residence condition on lending to your own company, and no minimum or maximum amount applies by default. A non-resident shareholder can wire euros from a foreign personal account to the French corporate account at any time, before or after the Kbis (the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe, the clerk of the commercial court) is delivered. The advance is booked as a liability of the company toward the shareholder. Unlike a capital contribution, it does not change the share capital, does not require a notary or a capital-increase meeting, and does not appear in the BODACC (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the gazette publishing company creations and capital changes). Unlike a dividend, it needs no profit and no annual meeting. But informality is the danger: an undocumented wire looks like unexplained cash to the bank, unproven equity to a buyer, and a disguised gift to the tax office. The loan must be written, approved where the law requires, and traceable from the foreign account to the company ledger.

A. How does a shareholder advance work when the lender lives outside France

Civil law treats the advance as an ordinary loan of fungible things. The Civil Code defines it in these terms: “Le prêt de consommation est un contrat par lequel l’une des parties livre à l’autre une certaine quantité de choses qui se consomment par l’usage, à la charge par cette dernière de lui en rendre autant de même espèce et qualité.” Money lent must be returned in the same amount and currency. For a shareholder advance, restitution is the default: the company owes the balance back. The same Code adds a formality that governs every interest clause: “L’intérêt est légal ou conventionnel. L’intérêt légal est fixé par la loi. L’intérêt conventionnel peut excéder celui de la loi, toutes les fois que la loi ne le prohibe pas. Le taux de l’intérêt conventionnel doit être fixé par écrit.” No written rate, no interest: a founder who wires 200,000 euros with a verbal promise of 5 percent holds, in law, a loan bearing no interest until a writing says otherwise.

The written agreement should be short and complete: identities of lender and company, amount, currency and value date, term (open or fixed), interest rate and calculation method, repayment mechanics, subordination if any, and the law and jurisdiction clause. Cross-border lenders add three clauses: the foreign source account reference for anti-money-laundering traceability, the exchange-rate rule when the wire passes through another currency, and a statement that the advance is a shareholder loan distinct from the capital contribution and from any later dividend. The agreement is signed before or at the time of the wire, not reconstructed a year later when the auditor asks. The company books the receipt the same day, the shareholder keeps the SWIFT message, the foreign bank debit advice, and the company bank credit advice with matching references.

Company law then asks whether the loan agreement is a regulated related-party transaction. In a SARL, the manager or the auditor where one exists must report on agreements between the company and its managers or shareholders, and the meeting votes on that report, with the interested party excluded from the vote and from quorum. The Code states that “Le gérant ou, s’il en existe un, le commissaire aux comptes, présente à l’assemblée ou joint aux documents communiqués aux associés en cas de consultation écrite, un rapport sur les conventions intervenues directement ou par personnes interposées entre la société et l’un de ses gérants ou associés. L’assemblée statue sur ce rapport. Le gérant ou l’associé intéressé ne peut prendre part au vote et ses parts ne sont pas prises en compte pour le calcul du quorum et de la majorité.” Where the company has a single shareholder dealing with itself, the rule lightens to a mere entry in the decision register: “lorsque la société ne comprend qu’un seul associé et que la convention est conclue avec celui-ci, il en est seulement fait mention au registre des décisions.” In an SAS, the mirror rule provides that “Le commissaire aux comptes ou, s’il n’en a pas été désigné, le président de la société présente aux associés un rapport sur les conventions intervenues directement ou par personne interposée entre la société et son président, l’un de ses dirigeants, l’un de ses actionnaires disposant d’une fraction des droits de vote supérieure à 10 % ou, s’il s’agit d’une société actionnaire, la société la contrôlant au sens de l’article L. 233-3.” Unapproved agreements still bind the company, but the interested person bears any harmful consequences, and with a single shareholder the same register entry suffices. A foreign founder who is both president and lender therefore signs twice, once for each capacity, files the entry in the register, and keeps the auditor’s report where an auditor exists. Banks in Paris routinely ask for that register page before accepting a large shareholder wire as stable funding rather than transitory cash.

Two structures deserve attention. The open advance (compte courant libre) is repayable on demand and suits bridge financing before a capital increase or a bank loan. The blocked advance (compte courant bloqué) locks the funds for a fixed term, often to reassure a bank granting credit or to support an application file; the blockage agreement states the duration, the conditions for early release, and whether interest accrues during the lock. A cash-pooling agreement between a foreign parent and its French subsidiary works the same way at group level, with sweeping mechanics and remuneration grids. Whatever the label, the substance decides: money made available by a shareholder and recorded in its name is a shareholder advance, and the clauses on term and interest written at the start determine everything that follows, including survival in insolvency as the 2026 ruling discussed below shows.

B. When can you demand repayment, and what can stop you

The default rule favours the lender. The Court of Cassation, commercial chamber, 12 February 2025, appeal No. D 23-17.483, endorsed the principle in these terms: “sauf stipulation contraire, tout associé était en droit d’exiger à tout moment et peu important les motifs de sa demande le remboursement du solde de son compte courant, dès lors que l’avance ainsi consentie constituait un prêt à durée indéterminée”, adding that the appeal court had “en a exactement déduit” the consequences, and closing with “REJETTE le pourvoi”. An open shareholder advance is therefore a loan of indefinite duration: the shareholder can call it back at any moment, for any reason, without justifying the request. That case concerned a departing shareholder whose shares had been bought back while the current account stayed unpaid; the Court confirmed that the price of the shares and the repayment of the advance are independent obligations unless the parties linked them in writing. For a founder abroad, the message is that demanding repayment needs no motive, but linking the advance to another transaction needs an explicit clause.

Three agreed limits can delay repayment. First, a fixed term or a blockage agreement: while the lock runs, the company may refuse early repayment, and the lender can only invoke the release events stated in the clause, such as the bank loan being repaid or a minimum equity ratio being restored. Second, a subordination clause in favour of a bank or a restructuring plan: the shareholder agrees to be paid after certain creditors, which is common when the bank makes its loan conditional on the shareholder leaving funds in place. Third, the company’s cash position as interpreted by the courts: repayment remains due in law, but forcing payment against an empty account yields a judgment, not cash, and a demand that pushes a fragile company into insolvency can later be examined for fault where the lender also managed the company. The prudent founder calendars the blockage expiry, keeps the bank’s written consent to any early release, and staggers large repayments against supplier and payroll dates rather than emptying the account the day the lock ends.

Insolvency changes the ranking without cancelling the debt. The shareholder advance is declared as an ordinary unsecured claim (créance chirographaire) in the receivership or liquidation, paid after employees, the tax office, URSSAF (the French social-contributions collector) and secured banks. Interest treatment follows a strict statutory stop. The Commercial Code provides that “Le jugement d’ouverture arrête le cours des intérêts légaux et conventionnels, ainsi que de tous intérêts de retard et majorations, à moins qu’il ne s’agisse des intérêts résultant de contrats de prêt conclus pour une durée égale ou supérieure à un an ou de contrats assortis d’un paiement différé d’un an ou plus.” Only loans agreed from the start for one year or more, or with a deferred payment of one year or more, keep producing interest after the opening judgment. A very recent ruling with a cross-border pattern illustrates the point: the Court of Cassation, commercial chamber, 9 September 2026, appeal No. W 25-16.955, in a case where a Swedish parent had funded its French subsidiary through a cash-pool agreement later supplemented by shareholder advances, restated that “Seuls les intérêts résultant d’un contrat de prêt conclu pour une durée égale ou supérieure à un an ou d’un contrat assorti d’un paiement différé d’un an ou plus échappent à la règle de l’arrêt du cours des intérêts édictée par le premier de ces textes et rendue applicable au redressement et à la liquidation judiciaires par les deuxième et troisième.” The Court quashed the appeal ruling because the funds had been paid under an original cash-pool agreement that fixed no repayment period, so the later five-year extensions could not rescue post-opening interest. The founder’s lesson is concrete: state the duration in the original agreement, keep each amendment signed and dated, and understand that an open advance called repayable at any moment stops earning interest the day insolvency opens.

Paris and Ile-de-France practice adds a procedural layer. Where the French company is registered in Paris, shareholder-company disputes go to the Paris judicial court or the Paris commercial court depending on the nature of the claim, the greffe of the Paris commercial court keeps the decision register extracts that prove the related-party entry, and the publication of any insolvency opening appears in the BODACC with the claims-declaration deadline, usually two months from publication for creditors abroad. A lender living outside France declares the claim electronically within that deadline, attaches the loan agreement, the SWIFT trail and the ledger extract, and designates a French address for service. Missing the deadline turns even a well-documented advance into a late claim paid, in practice, out of whatever remains.

II. What does the shareholder loan earn and cost: interest, tax and criminal risk

A shareholder advance can work twice: it funds the company, and its interest rewards the lender. French tax law allows both effects but caps and taxes them precisely. The company deducts interest only within a statutory ceiling, the lender is taxed on the interest in France and at home, and the manager who confuses the company’s money with personal money faces criminal exposure. Each point turns on documents signed before the dispute, not on explanations given after it.

A. Can your French company pay you interest, and how is it taxed

Interest must be written, and deductible interest must stay within the legal ceiling. The Tax Code allows deduction of “Les intérêts servis aux associés à raison des sommes qu’ils laissent ou mettent à la disposition de la société, en sus de leur part du capital, quelle que soit la forme de la société, dans la limite de ceux calculés à un taux égal à la moyenne annuelle des taux effectifs moyens pratiqués par les établissements de crédit et les sociétés de financement pour des prêts à taux variable aux entreprises, d’une durée initiale supérieure à deux ans.” This average rate, known as the TMP (taux moyen de pratique du marché, published quarterly in the Journal officiel), is the maximum deductible rate. Interest above the TMP stays taxable in the lender’s hands but is permanently non-deductible for the company. A second condition applies: “Cette déduction est subordonnée à la condition que le capital ait été entièrement libéré.” A founder who subscribed 10,000 euros of capital but paid up only 6,000 cannot make the company deduct a single euro of current-account interest until the remaining 4,000 is paid in. Indexation clauses on shareholder advances are treated as interest under the same ceiling.

A numerical example makes the ceiling tangible. Suppose the founder advances 150,000 euros for the full year at a contractual 6 percent while the annual TMP average stands at 5 percent. The company pays 9,000 euros of interest but deducts only 7,500 euros; at the standard corporate rate recalled earlier in this guide, the deduction saves about 1,875 euros of corporate tax, and the 1,500 euro excess is lost for deduction purposes. Had the contract set 5 percent, the full 7,500 euros would be deductible. Founders who refinance each year therefore check the published TMP before amending the rate clause, and auditors adjust the excess automatically when the clause overshoots.

On the lender’s side, interest paid by a French company to an individual is subject to a withholding levy where the payer sits in France. The Code provides that individuals receiving interest and similar investment income, including interest on shareholder advances whether open or blocked individual accounts, “sont assujetties à un prélèvement lorsque la personne qui assure le paiement de ces revenus est établie en France, qu’il s’agisse ou non du débiteur, ce dernier étant établi en France ou hors de France.” For a lender resident in France the levy works as an advance against the single 30 percent levy or the progressive scale; modest households can request exemption from the advance under the stated thresholds. For a lender living abroad, French withholding applies at the domestic or treaty rate, commonly reduced by tax treaties for interest, and the residence State taxes the gross interest with a credit for the French levy within treaty limits. The paying company must therefore identify the lender’s residence before paying: obtain the tax-residence certificate, apply the treaty form where one exists, withhold correctly, and issue the annual tax statement (imprimé fiscal unique) that the lender reports in both countries. Interest wired gross to a foreign account without withholding or certificate is the most common source of later reassessment, because the administration treats the omission as a failure of the payer, then pursues the company for the missing levy plus penalties.

Value-added tax does not apply to the loan itself: granting and repaying a shareholder advance is outside VAT scope, and interest is exempt without credit. Where the foreign lender is a company rather than an individual, the interest enters its taxable profit at home or under the treaty permanent-establishment rules, and transfer-pricing discipline applies inside groups: the rate must match what independent parties would agree, documented by the TMP reference and, for large balances, a comparability note. The official impots.gouv.fr company pages and the service-public.fr business guides describe the declaration chain, from the corporate return to the withholding forms, and the INPI one-stop shop (the Guichet unique run by the Institut national de la propriété industrielle) keeps the company filings that support the accounts in which the interest appears.

B. What turns a helpful advance into a liability, and what proof protects you from abroad

The mirror image of the shareholder’s credit balance is the debit balance: the founder who borrows from the company instead of lending to it. French criminal law punishes managers who misuse corporate assets for personal ends. The Code provides imprisonment and a fine for managers who commit “de faire, de mauvaise foi, des biens ou du crédit de la société, un usage qu’ils savent contraire à l’intérêt de celle-ci, à des fins personnelles ou pour favoriser une autre société ou entreprise dans laquelle ils sont intéressés directement ou indirectement”. A persistent debit current account, used to pay personal expenses from London or New York with no repayment date and no interest, is the textbook illustration prosecutors and auditors cite: company cash funding a lifestyle unrelated to the business, with bad faith inferred from duration, amount and concealment. The parallel prohibition on managers borrowing from the company or overdrawing their account completes the picture. Founders must therefore keep the flow one-directional unless a documented business reason, a board authorisation and a repayment schedule support the opposite movement. Never pay personal rent, school fees or travel unrelated to the company from the corporate account and label it an advance; the label does not cleanse the substance.

Recharacterisation is the tax version of the same warning. The administration reclassifies undocumented shareholder inflows as hidden profit distributions or undeclared capital contributions, and undocumented outflows as disguised remuneration, each with its own penalty rate. An advance with no agreement, no ledger entry and no interest, repaid in round trips around year-end, reads as window-dressing. An advance converted informally into capital without a capital-increase resolution reads as an unfiled transaction the greffe never recorded. An advance whose interest exceeds any market reference with no comparability note reads as a profit strip. Each reading costs more than the drafting that would have prevented it.

The proof file for a lender living abroad has six layers. First, the signed advance agreement with term, written rate, repayment and governing law, executed before the wire. Second, the bank trail: foreign debit advice, SWIFT message, French credit advice, and ledger entries in the company’s accounting software showing the credit to the named shareholder account. Third, the corporate approvals: decision-register entry for a single-shareholder company, meeting minutes with the interested party excluded for multi-shareholder companies, and the auditor’s related-party report where an auditor exists. Fourth, the life of the loan: annual statements of balance and accrued interest, amendments for rate or term signed before their effective date, and board notes recording each drawdown and repayment with references. Fifth, the tax trail: corporate return claiming the deductible portion within the TMP ceiling, withholding computation and payment evidence, annual tax statement issued to the lender, French non-resident or resident return reporting the interest, and the residence-State return claiming treaty credit with the exchange-rate method stated. Sixth, the insolvency survival kit: original duration clause, dated amendments, and the declaration file ready for electronic filing within the claims deadline published in the BODACC. Stored together in one bilingual folder, these documents answer the bank’s compliance officer, the auditor, the tax inspector and the insolvency judge with the same consistent story.

Two final reflexes separate durable financing from fragile improvisation. Calendar discipline: diary the blockage expiry, the TMP publication dates, the accounts-approval meeting that reviews the advance balance, and the withholding payment dates, because every missed date converts a right into a dispute. Separation discipline: one corporate account movement, one reference, one ledger line, no netting of personal and company flows across the same transfer, because netted wires are unauditable wires. A founder in another time zone who respects both disciplines runs the French company on the same footing as a Paris-based owner, with the added advantage that every decision leaves a written trace by necessity rather than by habit.

Conclusion

A shareholder loan is the simplest way for a founder living abroad to finance a French company, and the easiest to mishandle. The advance is a loan of indefinite duration repayable at any moment unless the parties agreed otherwise, it bears interest only at a written rate, the company deducts that interest only within the published market-average ceiling and only where the capital is fully paid up, the interest suffers withholding in France before being taxed again at home with treaty relief, and the whole structure survives related-party review and insolvency only through documents signed at the start. Write the agreement before wiring, record the related-party entry, stay within the rate ceiling, withhold correctly, and keep the bank, ledger and tax trails aligned. Handled that way, the compte courant d’associé does what it promises: it puts the founder’s money to work in France and brings it home, with interest, when the time comes.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
2 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago