Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French SAS Pays You Dividends While You Live Abroad: Vote, Withhold and Reclaim the Treaty Difference

Your French SAS Wants to Pay You Dividends While You Live Abroad: Vote the Distribution, Withhold the Right Tax and Reclaim the Treaty Difference

You formed a French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose), the company is profitable, and now you want the money to move from Lyon, Paris or Bordeaux to your personal account in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. Your accountant in France tells you that the shareholders must vote, that the company must withhold French tax before wiring anything, and that your country of residence may tax the same dividend again. You wonder whether you can simply transfer the cash, which rate applies to a person who no longer lives in France, whether a tax treaty lowers the bill, and which papers prove that the distribution was lawful if the French tax office (the Direction générale des finances publiques, the national tax administration) asks questions two years later.

This guide answers those questions in the order a foreign owner actually faces them. First, the company-law sequence: can the SAS distribute this year, who votes, and when the payment must arrive. Second, the tax sequence: the French withholding tax (retenue à la source, an amount the paying company deducts and sends to the Treasury on your behalf), the different rates for individuals and companies, the European parent-subsidiary exemption, and the practical reclaim procedure when a treaty rate is lower than the French domestic rate. Every French acronym is explained on first use: Kbis (the official company identity extract issued by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court), INPI (the National Industrial Property Institute that runs the single business filing portal called the Guichet unique), BODACC (the official bulletin that publishes company creations, transfers and insolvencies), URSSAF (the social-security collection agency for employers and the self-employed), DSN (the monthly online payroll declaration), and CGI (the Code général des impôts, the French Tax Code).

The starting point for any foreign founder is the general formation path described in our pillar guide for overseas owners, Setting Up a Company in France as a Foreign Founder: Bank Account, Kbis, VAT and Your First Hire, which explains the Kbis, the capital deposit certificate and the VAT (value added tax) number. The present article builds on that foundation for the specific moment when profits leave the company as dividends to a shareholder who lives outside France.

I. How does a French SAS vote and pay dividends when the owner lives abroad?

A dividend is not a salary, not a repayment of a shareholder loan (called a compte courant d’associé, the current account through which a shareholder lends money to the company), and not an unrestricted cash movement the president can order alone. It is a collective decision that converts a slice of the company’s equity into a personal claim of each shareholder, and French courts cancel distributions that skip the required steps. For a founder who manages from abroad, the discipline is therefore to vote correctly, document the vote in a way the greffe and the tax office accept, and pay within the legal deadline.

A. Can your SAS pay dividends this year: distributable profit, reserves and the sham-dividend trap?

French law starts from a simple equation. The statute provides that “Le bénéfice distribuable est constitué par le bénéfice de l’exercice, diminué des pertes antérieures, ainsi que des sommes à porter en réserve en application de la loi ou des statuts, et augmenté du report bénéficiaire.” In plain English: distributable profit means the profit of the financial year, minus prior losses, minus the sums that the law or the articles of association require to be placed in reserve, plus retained earnings carried forward (called report bénéficiaire, the past profits the shareholders chose not to distribute). The shareholders in general meeting may also decide to distribute sums taken from reserves that are at their disposal, but the resolution must state expressly from which reserve items the amounts are taken, and dividends are taken first from the distributable profit of the year. No distribution is allowed, except in a capital reduction, when equity would fall below the share capital plus the non-distributable reserves. The revaluation surplus (écart de réévaluation, an accounting uplift that does not reflect cash) can never be distributed.

Three practical consequences follow for a SAS held from abroad. First, you need approved annual accounts before you vote an ordinary dividend. The statute states that “Après approbation des comptes annuels et constatation de l’existence de sommes distribuables, l’assemblée générale détermine la part attribuée aux associés sous forme de dividendes.” Without approved accounts showing distributable sums, there is nothing to distribute. An interim dividend (called acompte sur dividendes, an advance paid before the year-end accounts are approved) is possible only on the basis of an interim balance sheet certified by a statutory auditor (called commissaire aux comptes, the independent auditor appointed in larger companies), and its amount cannot exceed the interim profit defined by the same article. Small SAS companies with no auditor therefore rarely use interim dividends, and founders who wire an advance to themselves without that certified balance sheet create a textbook sham dividend.

Second, a dividend paid in breach of those rules is classified by the same article in severe terms: “Tout dividende distribué en violation des règles ci-dessus énoncées est un dividende fictif.” A sham dividend (called dividende fictif, a distribution voted without real distributable profit) exposes the managers who ordered or knowingly received it to civil liability to repay the company and, in serious cases, to criminal prosecution for presenting false accounts or distributing fictitious dividends. The tax administration may also reclassify the payment as salary or as another form of income with a different tax treatment. From abroad, you cannot verify the numbers by glancing at the bank balance. You must ask your French accountant for the approved balance sheet, the profit-and-loss account, the notes, and the written resolution showing the calculation from net profit to distributable sum, including the 5 percent legal reserve allocation that applies until that reserve reaches 10 percent of the share capital in most companies.

Third, the opposite pattern also creates litigation: profits that are never distributed because the majority shareholder systematically pushes everything into reserves. French case law defines abuse of majority as a resolution adopted against the interests of the company and for the sole purpose of favouring majority shareholders at the expense of minority shareholders. The Court of Appeal of Poitiers recalled on 11 March 2025 in case RG 24/00333, published at https://www.courdecassation.fr/decision/67d1246df456a51eaee36dbb, that “La notion d’abus de majorité, dégagée par la jurisprudence, se définit comme une résolution prise contrairement à l’intérêt social et dans l’unique dessein de favoriser des membres de la majorité au détriment de membres de la minorité.” The same judgment quotes the leading Commercial Chamber ruling of 1 July 2003 number 99-19328, under which “les bénéfices d’exploitation de l’entreprise sont venus systématiquement accroître le montant des capitaux propres, (…) sans que cette mise en réserve n’ait eu aucun effet sur la politique d’investissement de l’entreprise” can constitute such abuse. For a foreign minority investor in a French SAS, this matters when a local partner who runs the business refuses any dividend for years, builds reserves from 138,000 euros to more than 280,000 euros, and at the same time increases his own manager pay. The remedy is not to wire money unilaterally. It is to request documented investment plans at the meeting, have your opposition recorded in the minutes, and, if the reserves serve no debt, no risk and no profitable investment, seek annulment of the allocation resolution and damages before the commercial court of the registered office (called tribunal de commerce, the business court of the siège social, the registered address shown on the Kbis).

In short, before thinking about tax, confirm three documents from wherever you live: the approved accounts, the written calculation of distributable profit after losses and reserves, and the signed minutes allocating a precise dividend per share. If any of the three is missing, postpone the payment and fix the company-law basis first.

B. Who votes the dividend in a SAS and when must the money reach you?

The SAS is famous for contractual flexibility, but the vote on accounts and profits cannot be left informal. The Commercial Code provides that “Les statuts déterminent les décisions qui doivent être prises collectivement par les associés dans les formes et conditions qu’ils prévoient.” Your articles of association (called statuts, the private constitution of the company filed with the INPI and the greffe) therefore decide whether dividends are voted in a physical meeting, by video conference, by written consultation or by unanimous written consent, and what quorum and majority apply. Most foreign-held SAS articles require a collective decision of the shareholders for accounts and profits, often by simple majority of votes cast, sometimes with a reinforced majority for distributions from reserves. Read that clause before you act, because a dividend voted in a form your own articles forbid is vulnerable to annulment even if the numbers were correct.

Where there is a single shareholder (called associé unique, the sole owner of a SASU, the one-person version of the SAS), the same article adds that the sole shareholder approves the accounts within six months of the year end, cannot delegate that power, and records each decision in a register. The practical tip for a founder who lives abroad is to keep that register rigorously: date, place or consultation method allowed by the articles, full text of each resolution, dividend per share, total per shareholder, payment date and method, and signature. Banks, auditors and tax inspectors treat that register as the primary proof that the money wired to London or New York is really a dividend and not disguised pay.

The tax judge applies the same logic. The Council of State (called Conseil d’État, the supreme court for tax disputes) held on 27 March 2019 in decision number 421211, published at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ceta/id/CETATEXT000038279160, that “une décision de distribution de dividendes n’est irrégulière que si elle n’a pas été prise par l’organe compétent, si elle est le résultat d’une fraude ou si elle n’entre dans aucun des cas pour lesquels le code de commerce autorise la distribution de sommes prélevées sur les bénéfices.” A missing signature on a register, by itself, did not make the distribution irregular when the competent body had actually decided it, but a decision taken by the wrong person, obtained by fraud, or paid from sums the Commercial Code does not allow to distribute does. From abroad, the lesson is operational: hold the vote with the right body under your articles, record it, and keep the auditor report when one is required.

Once voted, the dividend must be paid promptly. The statute provides for the payment mechanics that “la mise en paiement des dividendes doit avoir lieu dans un délai maximal de neuf mois après la clôture de l’exercice.” The shareholders set the payment terms, or the board or managers do if the meeting delegates that task, but the outside limit is nine months after the financial year closed, unless a court grants an extension. A dividend voted in June for a calendar-year company should therefore reach your foreign account by 30 September of the same year in the normal case. After payment, the company files the accounts with the greffe (one month after the meeting, two months if filed online through the Guichet unique), and the publication appears in BODACC. Keep the bank proof of the wire with the same value date, because the withholding-tax return and your foreign tax credit both refer to the payment date, not the vote date.

Foreign founders sometimes ask whether they can fix a missed vote later. You can hold a late meeting and vote late, but you cannot backdate minutes, and you cannot reclassify an old unexplained transfer as a dividend after a tax audit starts. If money already left the company without a vote, ask your accountant whether it must be booked as a compte courant d’associé advance, repaid, or formalised through the next lawful distribution, with interest and tax consequences disclosed. A clean new resolution never cures a sham dividend retroactively, and an auditor who certifies a false interim balance sheet faces separate liability.

II. How much French tax is withheld on dividends paid to a shareholder living abroad?

Once the company-law base is clean, the second question is who takes what before the net amount lands abroad. France taxes dividends paid by a French company to a person who lives outside France at source, meaning the SAS itself deducts the French tax and pays it to the Treasury. Your country of residence may then tax the gross or net dividend again, with a foreign tax credit under the applicable treaty. The two most expensive mistakes are to apply the French-resident 30 percent flat-tax reasoning to a non-resident, and to assume that a treaty automatically applies without any form.

A. What withholding rate applies to you and can a tax treaty reduce it?

The domestic starting point is Article 119 bis of the Tax Code. It provides that “Les produits visés aux articles 108 à 117 bis donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source dont le taux est fixé par l’article 187 lorsque leurs bénéficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur siège en France” The beneficial owner (called bénéficiaire effectif, the person who really receives and enjoys the income, not a mere intermediary) who has neither a French tax domicile nor a French seat therefore suffers a withholding tax whose rate is set by Article 187.

Article 187 then distinguishes between individuals and companies. It provides a rate of “12,8 % pour les bénéficiaires personnes physiques.” A foreign individual shareholder of a French SAS therefore faces a 12.8 percent French withholding on the gross dividend under domestic law. For other beneficiaries, essentially companies, the same article refers to “Celui prévu au deuxième alinéa du I de l’article 219 pour tous les autres revenus.” Article 219 states for the calculation of tax that “Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %.” In practice, the French paying company withholds 25 percent on dividends paid to a foreign company shareholder under current domestic law, and 75 percent when the dividend is paid into a non-cooperative jurisdiction listed under Article 238-0 A of the Tax Code (called ETNC, the French blacklist of non-cooperative states and territories), unless the payer proves the payment has neither the object nor the effect of locating income there for tax fraud. The 12.8 percent individual rate and the 25 percent company rate are the domestic defaults before any treaty.

Treaties change those defaults. France has signed more than one hundred bilateral conventions for the avoidance of double taxation, each with its own dividend article, usually paragraphs that cap the source-state tax at 0, 5 or 15 percent depending on the percentage of capital held and the holding period. The United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates conventions, for example, each contain their own thresholds and their own definition of beneficial ownership, and the applicable text is the English-and-French authentic version in force on the payment date as published by decree. You do not choose the most favourable treaty. The only treaty that can apply is the one between France and the state where you are resident for tax purposes on the payment date, and only if you are its beneficial owner and meet any limitation-on-benefits, holding-period and anti-abuse conditions it contains.

Inside the European Union and the European Economic Area, a further domestic exemption can remove the withholding entirely for parent companies. Article 119 ter of the Tax Code provides that “La retenue à la source prévue au 2 de l’article 119 bis n’est pas applicable aux dividendes distribués à une personne morale qui remplit les conditions énumérées au 2 du présent article par une société ou un organisme soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés au taux normal.” The conditions include an effective management seat in the European Union or the European Economic Area with administrative assistance, an eligible legal form, direct ownership of at least 10 percent of the distributing company’s capital held continuously for two years or a commitment to hold for two years with a tax representative, and liability to corporate tax without exemption. The rate is reduced to 5 percent for a beneficial owner that holds qualifying participations under Article 145 and cannot credit the withholding. Dividends paid by special property vehicles (called SIIC, the listed real-estate regime, and similar vehicles) follow separate withholding rules at specific rates and are outside the standard SAS case.

Do not confuse the non-resident withholding with the French-resident levy that your French friends pay. For individuals domiciled in France, Article 117 quater of the Tax Code sets a 12.8 percent non-final levy collected by the payer on distributed income That 12.8 percent is a non-final instalment (called prélèvement forfaitaire non libératoire, an advance collected by the payer), later credited against the single flat-rate tax of 30 percent (called prélèvement forfaitaire unique, 12.8 percent income tax plus 17.2 percent social charges, often shortened to PFU or flat tax) under Article 200 A of the Tax Code, unless the household opts for the progressive scale with the 40 percent allowance. The Tax Code grants that allowance in these terms for qualifying dividends: “sont réduits, pour le calcul de l’impôt sur le revenu, d’un abattement égal à 40 % de leur montant brut perçu” None of that resident machinery applies to you as a non-resident. You pay the Article 187 withholding, reduced only by treaty or by the Article 119 ter parent-subsidiary exemption, and you declare the net or gross amount in your state of residence under its own rules.

A numerical example makes the stakes concrete. A French SAS distributes 100,000 euros of gross dividends to its sole individual shareholder who lives in London and is resident in the United Kingdom for tax purposes. Under domestic law alone, the SAS withholds 12,800 euros and wires 87,200 euros. If the applicable treaty caps source tax at 15 percent for portfolio dividends, the domestic 12.8 percent is already below the cap, so no reduction is available and no reclaim arises. Reverse the situation with a foreign parent company holding 100 percent of the SAS: domestic withholding is 25,000 euros on 100,000 euros, while the treaty or the European exemption may cap or eliminate the French tax, leaving a reclaim of up to 25,000 euros if the correct form was not applied at payment. The treaty never creates a French refund beyond the tax actually withheld, and it never exempts the dividend in your residence state unless that state’s domestic law says so.

B. How do you prove your residence, file the forms and reclaim the difference?

The treaty rate is not automatic. The French payer must know, on the payment date, that you are entitled to it, or it must withhold at the domestic rate and you reclaim later. The standard proof is the residence certificate form 5000 (called imprimé 5000, the certificate of residence that your foreign tax office stamps) plus the dividend-specific form 5001 (called imprimé 5001, the calculation of the French withholding and the treaty reduction for dividends), both published by the French tax administration and filed through the payer. For relief at source (called application du taux réduit à la source, the reduced rate applied directly before wiring), the completed and stamped forms must reach the SAS or its paying agent before the dividend is paid. For a refund after withholding (called restitution, the later repayment of the excess over the treaty rate), the forms are filed after payment, generally before 31 December of the second year following payment, with bank proof, the minutes voting the dividend, and the withholding return.

The payer declares and pays the withholding through the French tax returns for investment income. For the advance on resident dividends, the Tax Code requires that “Le prélèvement visé à l’article 117 quater est versé au Trésor dans les quinze premiers jours du mois qui suit celui du paiement des revenus” The withholding on non-resident dividends follows a parallel monthly discipline through form 2777 (called déclaration 2777, the return for investment income and withholding) and its online payment. Late payment triggers interest and the same penalties as the withholding under Article 119 bis. Keep the 2777 receipt with the minutes and the wire slip: together they prove the date, the gross amount, the rate applied and the net paid, which is exactly what the foreign tax office will ask for when you claim a foreign tax credit.

Beneficial ownership is where files fail. The payer and the administration check that you, and not an interposed conduit, really enjoy the dividend. If a holding company in a treaty state forwards 95 percent of the dividend within days to a parent in a non-treaty state, keeps no staff and bears no risk, the administration may deny the treaty rate and apply the domestic 25 percent or 75 percent rate, plus penalties for abuse of law (called abus de droit, the procedure that disregards artificial arrangements). European case law on parent-subsidiary structures and the French beneficial-owner test in Article 119 bis require substance: directors who meet, accounts, employees or real activity, and a business reason beyond the tax saving. A foreign founder who holds the SAS directly as an individual rarely faces this challenge, but a chain with a shell company inserted just before the dividend vote will.

When domestic withholding exceeded the treaty cap, the reclaim file should contain six items: the stamped 5000 and 5001 forms for the year of payment, the signed minutes and accounts proving a regular distribution under the Council of State test quoted above, the 2777 return and payment proof showing the 12.8 or 25 percent withheld, the bank statement showing the net received abroad, a certificate of beneficial ownership and residence for the treaty article relied upon, and a cover letter identifying the gross dividend, the rate applied, the treaty article and the amount claimed. File through the French paying agent where possible, because direct filings from abroad take longer and generate more requests for supplements. Track the two-year reclaim deadline from the payment date, not from the French tax assessment, and declare the dividend in your residence state in the same year to avoid a mismatch that the foreign office treats as an omission.

Two boundary cases deserve a warning. Dividends that replace salary for a manager who works in France remain exposed to reclassification by URSSAF and the tax office when the manager’s pay is abnormally low and dividends abnormally high: the administration compares functions, hours and market pay, and the labour courts examine payslips, DSN filings and the employment contract. Dividends paid while the company is insolvent or on the eve of insolvency (called cessation des paiements, the moment the company cannot meet current liabilities with available assets) expose the managers to liability for increasing the shortfall and to claw-back of the distribution. If the SAS is fragile, ask your accountant to confirm solvency in writing before any vote, and consider leaving profits in a blocked reserve rather than distributing them.

Conclusion

A dividend from a French SAS to an owner who lives abroad succeeds when two files are clean on the same day. The company-law file shows approved accounts, a precise calculation from profit to distributable sum, a collective vote taken in the form your articles require and recorded in the register, and payment within nine months of the year end. The tax file shows the correct domestic withholding of 12.8 percent for an individual or 25 percent for a company, the treaty or European exemption properly evidenced by stamped residence forms before payment or by a complete reclaim afterwards, and a beneficial owner who can explain the holding chain. The Poitiers and Council of State rulings quoted above remind foreign owners of both risks at once: reserves built without investment can become an abuse of majority against a minority, while a distribution voted by the wrong body or from the wrong sums is irregular and loses its tax advantages. Prepare the minutes, the accounts, the 5000 and 5001 forms and the 2777 receipt together, wire the net amount with a clear dividend reference, and keep every proof where your successor, your bank and both tax offices can find it.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
2 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago