Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Offered a Rupture Conventionnelle in France After Brexit: How a British Employee Negotiates Severance, Keeps Benefits and Protects Their Residence

Your French employer has invited you to a meeting and put two words on the table: rupture conventionnelle. If you are a British employee working in France since before or after Brexit, this proposal deserves careful attention. It is neither a dismissal nor a resignation. It is a negotiated mutual separation agreement, a procedure created by French employment law that lets employer and employee agree together on the terms of the break, including a severance payment that cannot fall below a legal floor. Done well, it can fund your next step and preserve your rights to French unemployment benefits and your French residence. Done badly, signed under pressure or for too little money, it can cost you months of income, delay your benefits and even complicate the renewal of your residence card. This guide explains how the procedure works, how to calculate what you are owed, what happens with France Travail and your titre de séjour, and how to challenge a refusal or an unfair deal before the French labour court.

I. Negotiating and signing a rupture conventionnelle that protects a British employee

A. How British employees negotiate severance above the legal floor in France

A rupture conventionnelle, often translated as mutual termination or negotiated exit, is defined by the Labour Code as an agreement in which employer and employee jointly settle the conditions of the break. The statute states it plainly: “L’employeur et le salarié peuvent convenir en commun des conditions de la rupture du contrat de travail qui les lie.” The same article adds two decisive points for any British employee who feels pushed towards the door: “La rupture conventionnelle, exclusive du licenciement ou de la démission, ne peut être imposée par l’une ou l’autre des parties. Elle résulte d’une convention signée par les parties au contrat.” Those sentences come from article L1237-11 of the Labour Code, and they mean that no employer can force you to sign, and that the agreement is neither a sacking nor a resignation, with all the consequences that follow for benefits and references.

The first question every British employee asks is how much money is on the table. French law sets a floor, not a ceiling. The written agreement must state “le montant de l’indemnité spécifique de rupture conventionnelle qui ne peut pas être inférieur à celui de l’indemnité prévue à l’article L. 1234-9”, as article L1237-13 of the Labour Code provides. Article L1234-9 in turn gives the right to a dismissal indemnity to any employee on an open-ended contract (a CDI, contrat à durée indéterminée) with at least eight months of continuous service with the same employer, except in cases of serious misconduct. The text is available at article L1234-9 of the Labour Code. If you have less than eight months of service, there is no statutory floor, which makes advice before signing even more important, because everything then depends on negotiation.

The floor itself is calculated by regulation. Article R1234-2 of the Labour Code states that the indemnity cannot be less than one quarter of a month’s salary per year of service for the first ten years, plus one third of a month’s salary per year beyond ten years. The reference salary is the most favourable of two formulae set by article R1234-4 of the Labour Code: either the average monthly pay over the last twelve months, or one third of the pay of the last three months, with annual or exceptional bonuses counted only pro rata in the second formula. Take a concrete example. A British marketing manager in Lyon earns an average of 4,000 euros gross per month and has six years of service. The floor is six times one quarter of 4,000 euros, which is 6,000 euros. Take a second example. A British finance director in Paris earns 5,000 euros on average with twelve years of service. The floor is ten times 1,250 euros plus two times 1,666.67 euros, which is 15,833.33 euros. Anything below that figure makes the agreement unlawful, and the administrative authority is supposed to refuse approval.

In practice, British employees regularly negotiate well above the floor, and you should treat the first offer as the opening of a discussion rather than a fixed figure. Useful levers include the value of the notice period you would have served, accrued but untaken paid leave (congés payés), pro rata annual bonuses and commissions, compensation for a non-compete clause (clause de non-concurrence) that restricts your next job, and the practical value of a clean employment certificate and a supportive reference. If your employer genuinely wants a quick, dispute-free separation, each of these items has a price, and putting them in writing as part of the specific indemnity increases both your settlement and, within limits, the portion that benefits from favourable tax and social treatment. Ask for a written breakdown of every element of the final payment, the famous solde de tout compte, so that wages, leave, bonuses and the specific indemnity appear on separate lines. Keep every payslip and the draft agreement, because the labour court will want paper, not memories, if there is ever a dispute.

One warning matters more than any other in the negotiation. Do not resign to speed things up. A resignation (démission) generally closes the door to unemployment benefits, while a rupture conventionnelle that has been properly approved opens it. If your manager suggests that resigning would be simpler or quicker, that suggestion alone tells you to slow down and take advice. The same caution applies in reverse: do not let the employer present a dismissal for misconduct that you do not accept as the only alternative, without checking whether the facts would survive before a court. Our companion guide on how a British employee challenges an unfair dismissal in France explains the comparison in detail, and it is worth reading before you choose between fighting a dismissal and negotiating an exit.

B. The signing procedure British employees must follow: interviews, retraction and approval

The rupture conventionnelle is a formal procedure, and each step exists to guarantee that your consent is free. It begins with one or more interviews between you and the employer. During these meetings you have the right to be assisted. You may bring a colleague of your choice, whether a trade union representative, an elected staff representative or any other employee. If the company has no staff representation, you may bring an external employee adviser, known as a conseiller du salarié, chosen from an official list drawn up by the administration. The employer may also be assisted, but only if you use this right yourself, and each side must warn the other in advance. These guarantees come from article L1237-12 of the Labour Code. For a British employee who is negotiating in a second language, bringing a trusted colleague or an adviser is not a sign of hostility. It is the normal use of a statutory right, and it creates a witness to what was actually said in the room.

The agreement itself must be in writing and must settle the conditions of the break. It states the amount of the specific severance indemnity and the planned date of termination, which cannot fall before the day after official approval. Then comes a protection that surprises many British readers: from the date both sides sign, each party has fifteen calendar days to change its mind. This right of retraction (droit de rétractation) is exercised by letter sent by any means that proves the date of receipt by the other party. Only when this fifteen-day period expires without retraction can the file move to the next stage. The full rule is set by article L1237-13 of the Labour Code. In practice, send any retraction by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or by hand delivery against a signed receipt, and keep the proof. An email without proof of receipt is a gamble you do not need to take.

After the retraction period, the most diligent party sends a request for approval, called homologation, to the administrative authority, with a copy of the signed agreement. The authority has fifteen working days from receipt to check that the legal conditions are met and that both sides consented freely. If it stays silent, approval is deemed granted and the authority loses the power to decide. The validity of the agreement depends on this approval, and the statute adds that approval cannot be litigated separately from the agreement itself. Any dispute about the agreement, the approval or a refusal of approval goes to the labour court, the conseil de prud’hommes. That is article L1237-14 of the Labour Code. In daily practice the request is filed online through the TéléRC portal of the Ministry of Labour, and the competent office is the DREETS for the place where you work. If you work in Paris, that means the Paris unit of the DREETS for the Île-de-France region, and the fifteen-working-day clock runs from its acknowledgement of receipt, so keep that receipt with the same care as the agreement.

The official step-by-step guide published by the French administration walks through the same sequence of interview, signature, retraction and approval, and it is worth reading alongside this article. You can find it on the service-public.fr page on rupture conventionnelle. The British government also publishes general guidance for Britons living in France, covering work, benefits and residence, on the gov.uk Living in France guide, which is a useful starting point on the United Kingdom side before you examine the French procedure in detail. Two practical points complete the picture. First, the procedure is closed to certain collective situations, such as employment protection plans and collective agreements of the type listed in article L1237-16 of the Labour Code, so if your exit is part of a wider redundancy programme, different rules apply. Second, never accept a pre-dated or back-dated document. The dates of signature, retraction and approval must reflect reality, because the labour court checks the calendar first when an agreement is challenged.

II. After the signature: unemployment benefits, residence rights and legal remedies

A. How British employees keep France Travail benefits and their French residence after a negotiated exit

An approved rupture conventionnelle ends the contract by mutual agreement, and for unemployment insurance it counts as an involuntary loss of employment. That distinction is the reason the procedure is so widely used. French law provides that persons who are fit for work and seeking employment are entitled to a replacement income under the conditions set by the unemployment insurance scheme, as article L5421-1 of the Labour Code states. In practice, you register as a jobseeker with France Travail, the public employment service, and you claim the return-to-work allowance (allocation d’aide au retour à l’emploi) on the basis of the employer certificate (attestation France Travail) that your employer must give you at the end of the contract. Check that certificate line by line before you leave the building. An error in the reason for the break or in the amounts can delay your payments by weeks, and corrections are far easier to obtain while you still have a contact inside the company.

Two financial points need planning. First, the part of your severance that exceeds the legal or collectively agreed floor can push back the starting date of your benefits through waiting periods and deferrals applied by France Travail. A large negotiated package is still worth having, but you should budget for a gap of several weeks or even months before the first payment, and the exact start date will appear on your France Travail notification. Second, keep every document from the procedure, including the signed agreement, the approval receipt and all payslips, because France Travail may ask for them. If you worked in both the United Kingdom and France, tell France Travail about your full employment history. Periods completed in different states can be aggregated for benefit purposes under the coordination rules that continue to apply between France and the United Kingdom, but aggregation only works if you declare the periods and provide the paperwork.

Your residence in France is the second pillar to protect. Most British employees who arrived recently hold a work-related residence card, typically the temporary “salarié” card for open-ended contracts. The Code on the Entry and Residence of Foreigners provides that a foreigner working under an open-ended contract receives a temporary card marked “salarié” for a maximum of one year, and that the card is extended by one year if the holder is involuntarily deprived of employment, with the following renewal assessed against the remaining unemployment benefit rights. That is article L421-1 of the CESEDA. The same code adds a general shield: a foreigner who is involuntarily deprived of employment is not regarded as having stopped meeting the employment condition attached to cards of this type, as article L432-2 of the CESEDA provides. In plain terms, a properly approved rupture conventionnelle is an involuntary loss of employment, so it does not by itself sink your renewal. Register promptly with France Travail, keep your benefit statements, and present them at renewal as proof that you remain covered.

British residents who settled before the end of the Brexit transition period usually hold a Withdrawal Agreement card rather than a salarié card, and the logic is the same: keep evidence of continuous lawful residence, employment history and benefit entitlement, and do not let an administrative gap turn into a period without rights. Our guide on renewing a Withdrawal Agreement residence card and challenging a refusal explains the renewal procedure and the remedies in detail. One practical warning applies to everyone: do not travel for months without checking the conditions attached to your card, and do not ignore a request for additional documents from the préfecture. A renewal file goes quiet only when the administration has everything it needs, and silence from your side is the most common cause of refusals.

B. How British employees challenge a refusal of approval or an unfair rupture conventionnelle

Not every proposal ends in a clean signature, and the law provides a remedy for each type of failure. If the administrative authority refuses approval, the employment relationship simply continues. You remain an employee with your salary, your position and your protection against unfair treatment. A refusal is not a dismissal and it is not a resignation. It means the file did not satisfy the legal conditions, which happens most often when the severance is below the floor, when the consent of one side looks doubtful, or when the paperwork is incomplete. The dispute about the refusal goes to the labour court, as article L1237-14 of the Labour Code provides, and the same court hears disputes about the agreement and the approval itself. If you are the one who no longer wants the deal, use the fifteen-day retraction window first. It is faster, cheaper and cleaner than any court action.

Signed agreements can still be challenged, and French courts take consent seriously. Pressure, threats, harassment, misleading promises about re-employment, or a state of moral coercion linked to earlier misconduct proceedings can all lead a court to annul the agreement for a defect of consent. The consequence of annulment depends on the circumstances, but the effects are those of a dismissal without real and serious cause, with the corresponding compensation, when the defect comes from the employer’s side. Keep contemporaneous evidence from the start: emails proposing or pressing the signature, messages setting artificial deadlines, medical certificates if the pressure affected your health, and the names of colleagues who witnessed the interviews. A case is won with documents created at the time, not with reconstructions prepared months later.

The Court of Cassation has also confirmed that honesty is required from the employee, not only from the employer. In a widely noted ruling of 19 June 2024, the Social Chamber rejected the appeal of an employee who had obtained his employer’s consent by deliberately hiding information he knew to be decisive, namely that he was already preparing to join a competitor while invoking a wish for professional retraining. The Court recalled that under article 1137 of the Civil Code, “constitue un dol la dissimulation intentionnelle par l’un des contractants d’une information dont il sait le caractère déterminant pour l’autre partie”, and it approved the court of appeal for finding that the employee had deliberately concealed decisive facts to obtain consent, so that the employer’s consent was vitiated. That is article 1137 of the Civil Code as applied by the Court of Cassation, Social Chamber, 19 June 2024, appeal no. 23-10.817, published in the Bulletin. The Court then stated the rule that governs the aftermath: “Lorsque le contrat de travail est rompu en exécution d’une convention de rupture ensuite annulée en raison d’un vice du consentement de l’employeur, la rupture produit les effets d’une démission.” In that case the employee had to repay the severance received in error and pay compensation for the notice period he should have served, under the notice rules recalled by article L1237-1 of the Labour Code. The lesson for British employees is symmetrical and simple: do not sign under pressure, and do not obtain a signature by concealment either.

Time limits are strict, so do not wait. The Labour Code provides that any action concerning the break of the employment contract must be brought within twelve months of the notification of the break, as article L1471-1 of the Labour Code states. That twelve-month clock covers challenges to the agreement, claims for an additional severance balance, and disputes about the approval or its refusal. If you work in Paris, your case will normally go to the Paris labour court, whose procedure is entirely in French and where representation follows the standard rules of that court. Prepare a chronological file with the invitation to the interviews, the draft and signed agreement, proof of the retraction period, the approval request and receipt, the final payslips and the France Travail certificate. A well-ordered file presented early is often what turns a negotiation around before any hearing takes place.

Conclusion

A rupture conventionnelle can be the best exit a British employee in France ever negotiates, or the most expensive signature of their working life, and the difference lies entirely in preparation. Check the legal floor with the quarter-month and third-month formulae before you discuss any figure. Use your right to be assisted at the interviews. Respect the fifteen calendar days of retraction and the fifteen working days of administrative approval, and never accept back-dated paperwork. Register with France Travail without delay, budget for a possible gap before benefits start, and keep your benefit statements for the renewal of your residence card, because an approved agreement counts as an involuntary loss of employment. If the authority refuses approval, the contract continues. If consent was forced or extracted by concealment, the labour court can annul the agreement within twelve months of the break. Measure twice, sign once, and keep every document.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
2 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
6 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
3 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago