Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Run a French SAS From Abroad: Salary or Dividends, Costs, Withholding and Proof

You founded a French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible French limited company most foreign founders choose) but you live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. The company is starting to make money and you ask the question every foreign founder asks: should you pay yourself a salary as president, vote yourself dividends as shareholder, or combine both? The answer decides three bills at once: French social charges, French withholding tax, and the tax bill in the country where you actually live. It also decides what you must be able to prove, from abroad, if the French social security collector (URSSAF, the body that collects social contributions) or the French tax office asks questions two years later. This guide walks through both routes in plain English, with the exact French statutes and court decisions that govern them, worked numbers on 100,000 euros of profit, and a proof file you can build without boarding a plane. If you have not yet chosen your French vehicle, read first our guide on how to choose between a SAS, a SARL, a branch and a subsidiary in France, because the salary-versus-dividends equation is one of the reasons the SAS wins for most non-resident founders.

I. Paying Yourself a Salary as a Non-Resident SAS President: Social Charges, Withholding Tax and Paper Proof

A. French Social Charges Apply Even When You Live Abroad: The Assimilated-Employee Rule and What URSSAF Audits

The starting point surprises many foreign founders: the president of a SAS is not self-employed in the eyes of French social security law. The company is, in the words of the Commercial Code, represented towards third parties by a president appointed under the conditions set by the articles of association, and Le président est investi des pouvoirs les plus étendus pour agir en toute circonstance au nom de la société dans la limite de l’objet social. Because the president holds a corporate office rather than an employment contract, there is no payslip hierarchy to climb and no unfair-dismissal protection attached to the office itself. But for social security purposes the president is pulled into the general employees scheme by assimilation. Article L. 311-3 of the Social Security Code lists, at item 23, Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et des sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées among the persons compulsorily covered. The Cour de cassation confirmed the practical meaning of that assimilation in a decision of 15 May 2025 concerning a SAS president and a URSSAF reassessment: the court held that ce dirigeant était assujetti par assimilation au régime général en sa qualité de président d’une société par actions simplifiée (2nd Civil Chamber, 15 May 2025, appeal no. 23-13.763). Assimilated means you pay roughly the same contributions as an employee, without becoming an employee: no employment contract, no subordination link required, but contributions due all the same.

What exactly is charged? Article L. 242-1 of the Social Security Code provides that Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues au titre de l’affiliation au régime général des personnes mentionnées aux articles L. 311-2 et L. 311-3 sont assises sur les revenus d’activité tels qu’ils sont pris en compte pour la détermination de l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-1-1, and adds that Elles sont dues pour les périodes au titre desquelles ces revenus sont attribués. In practice, every euro of presidential pay declared to the DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly electronic payroll return every French company files) triggers two layers of contributions: the employer layer paid by your SAS, roughly 40 to 45 percent of gross pay as a rule of thumb, and the employee layer withheld from your pay, roughly 20 to 25 percent. A gross monthly salary of 5,000 euros therefore costs the company about 7,000 to 7,250 euros and leaves you about 3,800 to 4,000 euros before income tax. These are orders of magnitude, not a quote: the exact rates move every January with the social security ceiling and the supplementary pension rates, so ask your payroll provider for the year schedule and keep it in the file.

Living abroad does not switch these charges off. French social charges follow the work, not the residence: pay voted in Paris for managing a French company is French-source professional income, and the assimilation under L. 311-3 applies whether you sleep in the 8th arrondissement or in another country. The only exits are narrow and must be set up before the pay starts. Inside the European Union, the European Economic Area and Switzerland, a founder who remains affiliated in another Member State can work in France under a portable A1 posting or multi-state certificate; outside those frameworks, or when you genuinely manage the company day to day from French territory part of the year, French affiliation applies in full. Do not improvise this point: URSSAF controllers treat a zero-charge presidential pay as an anomaly, and our vertical has already documented what a full URSSAF audit looks like when you live abroad. If you pay yourself nothing at all, no contributions are due, because contributions sit on activity income actually attributed, but you then accrue no French health cover, no French pension quarters and no daily sickness benefits, and a sudden large dividend after years of zero pay is precisely the pattern that makes a controller open your file.

Build the proof as you go, because every document below is requested in audits and none can be reconstructed credibly afterwards. Keep the corporate decision fixing or changing your remuneration, whether it sits in the articles of association or in a shareholders decision; keep every monthly payslip (bulletin de paie) and the corresponding DSN receipts showing the pay was declared on time; keep the employment-register entry if you cumulate a genuine technical employment contract alongside the office, with the payslips that prove the two functions are real and separate; and keep the A1 certificate or the foreign affiliation proof if you claim an exemption. Our companion guide on hiring your first employee in France while living abroad explains the DPAE, contract, trial period and DSN mechanics that apply equally to your own pay run. One signature missing on the remuneration decision, one quarter of DSN never filed, and the discussion with URSSAF starts on the worst possible footing.

B. Income Tax on Your French Salary When You Live Abroad: Article 182 A Withholding, Treaty Relief and the French Return

Once social charges are accounted for, the salary meets French income tax at a special gate for non-residents. Article 182 A of the General Tax Code (CGI, Code général des impôts) provides that les traitements, salaires, pensions et rentes viagères, de source française, servis à des personnes qui ne sont pas fiscalement domiciliées en France donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source. Your SAS therefore withholds at source each month; this is not the pay-as-you-earn advance of French residents but a specific non-resident levy with its own annual scale. The current scale taxes only the slice above 17,275 euros: 12 % pour la fraction supérieure à 17 275 € et inférieure ou égale à 50 112€, then 20 % pour la fraction supérieure à 50 112€, with the annual bracket limits divided by twelve for monthly pay. Take a gross annual salary of 60,000 euros: nothing is due on the first 17,275 euros, 12 percent applies to the 32,837 euros between 17,275 and 50,112 euros, about 3,940 euros, and 20 percent applies to the 9,888 euros above 50,112 euros, about 1,978 euros, for a total withholding near 5,918 euros. The levy is then credited against your final French income tax bill, because the statute adds that the withholding is set against income tax assessed under the non-resident rules. If your tax treaty gives France no right or only a shared right to tax that salary, typically when you perform the duties entirely from your home country without a French fixed base, the treaty overrides the domestic levy and you reclaim or are exempted; if the duties are performed in France, France taxes first and your home country usually grants a credit.

Three practical consequences follow. First, the company must apply the scale correctly and remit on time: the 182 A withholding is the employer’s liability, and a mistake is collected from the SAS with penalties, not politely re-billed to you. Second, you still file a French non-resident return each spring covering the prior year, even when the withholding looked final, because the return reconciles the levy with the treaty, the real-expense deduction option and any other French-source income such as rental income or capital gains. Third, keep the monthly withholding slips, the annual tax summary your payroll provider issues, the filed return and the treaty-residence certificate of your home country together: when both countries claim the same salary, the file that wins the double-tax argument is the one that shows, month by month, where the work was done, what was withheld and what the treaty says. Founders who split their time should add boarding passes, board minutes recording where meetings were held and calendar extracts; tax residence under article 4 B of the CGI turns on facts, and facts without paper lose.

A final salary warning concerns deductibility at company level. Salary is deductible from the company’s taxable profit, but only within limits: article 39 of the CGI provides that les rémunérations ne sont admises en déduction des résultats que dans la mesure où elles correspondent à un travail effectif et ne sont pas excessives eu égard à l’importance du service rendu. A part-time founder living abroad who votes himself a Paris chief-executive salary while a local manager does the work invites the tax office to disallow part of the charge and tax the company on money it already paid out. Pay what the function is worth, minute it, and be able to describe a Hi week of presidential work if asked.

II. Paying Yourself Dividends as a Founder Living Abroad: Company Tax First, Withholding Second, Proof Always

A. No Dividend Without Distributable Profit: Approving the Accounts, the General Meeting and the Excessive-Pay Trap

Dividends obey a strict chronological order that no shareholder vote can shortcut: first the company earns a profit and pays corporate tax on it, then the shareholders approve the annual accounts, then the meeting verifies that distributable sums exist, and only then does it fix the dividend. Article L. 232-12 of the Commercial Code states the lock clearly: Après approbation des comptes annuels et constatation de l’existence de sommes distribuables, l’assemblée générale détermine la part attribuée aux associés sous forme de dividendes. For a founder living abroad this means the dividend calendar is the accounts calendar: financial year closed, usually on 31 December, accounts approved within six months, dividend voted at that meeting or from a later decision drawing on reserves, payment within nine months of year-end unless a court extends the deadline. Our annual legal-calendar guide details each deadline and the late-filing fixes; dividends voted without approved accounts showing distributable sums are not a clever shortcut but fictitious dividends, and fictitious dividends must be paid back, with the directors who arranged them exposed alongside the shareholders who knew or should have known.

The tax definition of what you receive matters because it draws the border between the two routes. Article 120 of the CGI provides that Sont considérés comme revenus au sens du présent article : 1° Les dividendes, intérêts, arrérages et tous autres produits des actions de toute nature et des parts de fondateur des sociétés, compagnies. In a SAS, everything the meeting distributes to you as shareholder falls in that basket, while everything the company pays you for your presidential function falls in the salary basket with its social charges. The border is policed from both sides. The tax office can recharacterise disguised salary as dividends or, conversely, excessive dividends as salary, depending on which reading raises more revenue; URSSAF can argue that a distribution rewards your work rather than your capital and belongs in the contribution base. The Cour de cassation drew an important boundary for the company-law side of these fights on 13 January 2021: a general meeting resolution granting exceptional pay to a director ne peut être annulée qu’en cas de violation des dispositions impératives du livre II dudit code ou de violation des lois qui régissent les contrats, et non au seul motif de sa contrariété à l’intérêt social, sauf fraude ou abus de droit commis par un ou plusieurs associés pour favoriser ses ou leurs intérêts au détriment de ceux d’un ou plusieurs autres associés (Commercial Chamber, 13 January 2021, appeal no. 18-21.860). Read that holding from the founder perspective: a minority shareholder or a buyer who attacks your pay package must prove a breach of mandatory company law, breach of contract law, fraud or abuse of rights, not merely that the sum looks large against the company’s results. The protection is real but narrow, so draft the resolution as if it will be read by a hostile reader: describe the duties performed, the period covered, the criteria applied, and have it voted by the competent body under your articles of association, with the statutory auditor convened whenever the law or the articles require it.

The economic contrast with salary is then simple to state and often misunderstood. Salary is deductible from corporate profit when it matches real work and stays reasonable, as article 39 requires; dividends are never deductible, because they are the distribution of profit after tax. France taxes that profit first at corporate level, where article 219 of the CGI sets the standard rule: Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %. On 100,000 euros of pre-pay profit with no salary, the company pays about 25,000 euros of corporate tax (IS, impôt sur les sociétés) and 75,000 euros remain available for the meeting to distribute. With a 60,000-euro gross salary, the company deducts the salary plus roughly 25,000 euros of employer charges, taxable profit falls near 15,000 euros, corporate tax near 3,750 euros, and the remaining profit can still feed a smaller dividend or reserves. Neither route is universally cheaper: the salary route buys French social cover and pension quarters at the price of heavy contributions, while the dividend route avoids social charges on the distribution but pays corporate tax first and leaves you socially uncovered for that income. Run both scenarios with your accountant on your real numbers before the year-end, not after, because once the accounts are approved the choice is locked for that year.

From abroad, organise the dividend paperwork around one meeting file. Before the meeting, the full accounts, the management report where required, the proposed allocation of profit between legal reserve, other reserves, retained earnings and dividends, and the draft resolutions must reach every shareholder within the statutory notice period, by the means your articles allow, including electronic notice if the articles permit it. At the meeting, or by written consultation if your SAS articles authorise it, record the approval of the accounts, the finding of distributable sums, the dividend per share, the payment date and the option, if any, between cash and shares. After the meeting, file the accounts with the greffe (the court registry that keeps the commercial register, the RCS) within the deadline, update the shareholder ledger and the beneficial-owner register (RBE, registre des bénéficiaires effectifs) if holdings moved, and have the bank transfer reference the meeting date. A dividend paid by a company whose accounts were never filed at the greffe, decided in an undated document signed only by you, is the file URSSAF and the tax office both love to challenge.

B. French Withholding on Dividends Paid Abroad: 12.8 Percent, Treaty Reductions and the Residence Forms That Unlock Them

When the dividend crosses the border to a shareholder who does not live in France, France taxes at source before the money leaves. Article 119 bis of the CGI provides that Les produits visés aux articles 108 à 117 bis donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source dont le taux est fixé par l’article 187 lorsque leurs bénéficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur siège en France. The rate sits in article 187: 12,8 % pour les bénéficiaires personnes physiques, while for most other income paid to foreign companies the levy equals Celui prévu au deuxième alinéa du I de l’article 219 pour tous les autres revenus, in other words the 25 percent corporate rate. On the 75,000 euros of distributable profit from the earlier example, a founder who is an individual living abroad suffers about 9,600 euros of French withholding and receives about 65,400 euros net of French tax, before any tax in the country of residence. Dividends routed through a non-cooperative state or territory face a 75 percent levy, which is why the payment chain must be clean and documented. Contrast this with the position of a founder who lives in France: article 117 quater of the CGI subjects France-domiciled individuals receiving distributions to un prélèvement au taux de 12,8 %, an advance credited against the final bill, with a means-tested exemption for modest households, and article 158 of the CGI lets resident shareholders who opt for the progressive scale reduce qualifying dividends by un abattement égal à 40 % de leur montant brut perçu. Neither the advance-levy exemption nor the 40 percent allowance is available to you as a non-resident; your regime is withholding at source, period, unless a treaty says otherwise.

The treaty is where a well-prepared founder recovers real money. France has signed around 120 double-tax treaties, and most cap French dividend withholding for individuals well below 12.8 percent, frequently at 15 percent and sometimes lower for direct corporate parents holding a substantial stake. But the reduced rate is never automatic: the French paying company must hold proof of your foreign tax residence before it pays, otherwise it must withhold at the full domestic rate and you are left reclaiming the excess afterwards. The proof runs on two official forms available on the tax administration website: form 5000, the residence certificate for the foreign administration, and form 5001, the calculation and settlement of the withholding on dividends, both published at the official form 5000 page and the official form 5001 page. The sequence that works is: obtain the residence certificate from your home tax authority early in the year, send it to your French company before the dividend is paid so the reduced treaty rate applies immediately, and keep a copy with the meeting file. Miss the timing and the reclaim runs through the foreign-tax procedure with translated documents, a wait measured in months, and interest for no one.

Then comes the second tax bill, in your country of residence. Most countries tax worldwide dividends and grant a credit for the French withholding within the treaty limit, which means the 12.8 or 15 percent paid in France reduces but rarely eliminates the home bill. American founders report the dividend on their federal return with a foreign tax credit subject to its basket limits; British founders use the foreign pages of the self-assessment return; founders in the Gulf states with no personal income tax may find the French withholding is the only tax, which changes the salary-versus-dividends maths dramatically in favour of dividends. Whatever your flag, keep a single cross-border file: the French meeting minutes, the dividend vouchers, the withholding certificates, the filed French forms, the home-country return and the treaty article you relied on. When two tax offices describe the same 65,400 euros differently, the founder with the complete file settles in correspondence; the founder without it settles in penalties.

Put the two routes side by side on the same 100,000 euros of pre-pay profit to see the trade-off. The all-salary route at 60,000 euros gross costs the company about 85,000 euros including employer charges, leaves about 15,000 euros of taxable profit and about 3,750 euros of corporate tax, and puts roughly 46,000 euros net of employee charges in your pocket before the 182 A withholding of about 5,900 euros, so around 40,000 euros spendable with full French social cover attached. The all-dividend route costs 25,000 euros of corporate tax, distributes 75,000 euros, withholds about 9,600 euros at 12.8 percent, and leaves about 65,400 euros with no French social cover and a home-country bill still to come. The mixed route, a modest salary covering your social-cover floor plus a dividend on the rest, is what most non-resident founders end up choosing: enough salary to keep health cover and pension quarters where they matter, enough dividend to avoid contributions on the surplus. The exact crossover point moves with your age, your health coverage abroad, your treaty and your home tax rate, which is why the calculation must be rerun every year and minuted, not remembered.

Conclusion

Salary buys French social protection and a company-level deduction at the price of 60 to 70 percent all-in loadings and a non-resident withholding you must reconcile each year; dividends skip social charges but pay 25 percent corporate tax first and 12.8 percent withholding second, with treaty relief available only to founders who prove residence before payment. Neither route tolerates improvisation from abroad: fix pay in a written corporate decision, declare it through payslips and the DSN, vote dividends only on approved accounts showing distributable sums, file those accounts at the greffe, and keep the withholding certificates and residence forms in one file your successor could understand. Run the numbers annually with your accountant, keep every paper the controllers will ask for, and the border becomes an administrative detail rather than a tax risk.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9271 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
2 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.