Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Dividends, Withholding Tax and How to Get the Money Out

Your French company has closed a profitable year and the money is sitting in the corporate account. You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, you own all or most of the shares, and you now want to do the simplest thing in the world: take your profit home. From abroad, this looks like a bank transfer. Under French law, it is a legal operation with two distinct battlefields, and getting either of them wrong costs real money.

The first battlefield is company law. A dividend is not a transfer you order online. It must be voted by the shareholders after the annual accounts are approved, funded exclusively out of distributable profit, and paid within a statutory deadline. A payment taken without a vote, or voted without available profit, is a fictitious dividend that can be reclaimed from you and can engage the personal liability of the director who authorised it. The second battlefield is tax. When the shareholder lives outside France, the French company must withhold tax at source before paying, at rates that depend on who you are, where you live and which tax treaty France has signed with your country of residence. Apply the domestic rate when a lower treaty rate was available, and the overpaid tax is gone unless you reclaim it through a formal procedure with strict deadlines. A September 2026 ruling of the Paris Court of Appeal shows the price of that mistake: an accounting firm was ordered to pay more than 50,000 euros in damages to a shareholder living in Spain because it had applied a 21 percent withholding rate for years when the applicable treaty rate was 15 percent. This guide explains both operations in practical order, for a foreign shareholder directing a French company from abroad: how to vote and pay the dividend lawfully, how much tax France keeps and how to reduce it, and how to reclaim or challenge an excessive levy before the deadlines expire.

I. Getting the Dividend Out of Your French Company From Abroad Without Breaking Company Law

A. Voting and Funding the Dividend: Distributable Profit, Reserves and the Annual Meeting You Must Hold Properly

Everything starts with a principle that surprises many foreign founders: the profit shown in the accounts does not belong to you until the shareholders have voted to distribute it. As long as no distribution has been voted, the profit stays in the company, and any withdrawal you make is legally an advance or, worse, a misuse of corporate assets. If you have not yet chosen the structure that will earn these profits, read our guide on choosing between an SAS, an SARL, a branch and a subsidiary as a foreign founder, because the vehicle determines who votes, who signs and how the profit flows. Once the company exists and earns money, the distribution follows a mandatory sequence.

First, the accounts of the closed financial year must be approved. In a French SAS, the simplified joint-stock company most foreign founders choose, and in a SARL, the limited liability company, the shareholders meet at least once a year to approve the annual accounts, and that meeting must be held within six months of the year end. You can attend and vote by video conference if the articles of association allow it, and you can sign the minutes electronically, so living abroad is no obstacle provided the paperwork is organised. The meeting approves the balance sheet and the profit and loss account, allocates the result, and only then votes the dividend. The two steps cannot be inverted: the dividend is voted after approval of the accounts and after confirming that distributable sums exist.

Second, the dividend can only be funded out of what the law calls distributable profit. Article L232-11 of the Commercial Code defines it precisely: “Le bénéfice distribuable est constitué par le bénéfice de l’exercice, diminué des pertes antérieures, ainsi que des sommes à porter en réserve en application de la loi ou des statuts, et augmenté du report bénéficiaire.” Distributable profit is the profit of the financial year, minus prior losses and the sums that must be placed in reserve by law or by the articles, plus retained earnings carried forward. The same article adds that the shareholders may also distribute sums taken from reserves at their disposal, provided the decision expressly states which reserve accounts are used, and that dividends are taken first from the distributable profit of the year. Two practical consequences follow for a foreign owner. The legal reserve must be funded first: five percent of each year’s profit must be allocated to it until it reaches ten percent of the share capital, and that slice can never be distributed. And prior losses must be absorbed before any distribution, so a company that lost money two years ago and earned money this year must offset the old losses first.

Third, the vote itself must be real and documented. Article L232-12 of the Commercial Code states: “Après approbation des comptes annuels et constatation de l’existence de sommes distribuables, l’assemblée générale détermine la part attribuée aux associés sous forme de dividendes.” After approval of the annual accounts and confirmation that distributable sums exist, the shareholders’ meeting determines the share allocated to the shareholders as dividends. The minutes must record the amount of distributable profit, the amount distributed, and the dividend per share. Keep these minutes with the company’s registers, because your bank, the tax administration and any future buyer will ask for them. If the company needs cash during the year before the accounts are approved, the same article allows interim dividends, but only on the basis of an interim balance sheet certified by the statutory auditor, and only up to the profit shown in that document. Most small foreign-owned companies have no statutory auditor, which means interim dividends are usually unavailable to them, and waiting for the annual meeting is the only lawful route.

The sanction for skipping these steps is severe and has a name you should know: the fictitious dividend. Article L232-12 of the Commercial Code warns: “Tout dividende distribué en violation des règles ci-dessus énoncées est un dividende fictif.” Any dividend distributed in breach of the above rules is a fictitious dividend. A fictitious dividend can be reclaimed from the shareholders who received it, and the directors who authorised it face civil liability and, in serious cases, criminal prosecution for distributing fictitious dividends. For a founder who is both the director and the sole shareholder, this is not an abstract risk: taking money out of the company account as an informal advance and calling it a dividend months later is exactly the pattern courts punish. Vote first, document the distributable profit, then pay.

B. Paying the Dividend to a Shareholder Who Lives Abroad: the Nine-Month Deadline, the Bank Trail and the Paperwork That Proves Everything

Once the dividend is voted, the company owes you a debt, and that debt must be paid on time. Article L232-13 of the Commercial Code provides: “la mise en paiement des dividendes doit avoir lieu dans un délai maximal de neuf mois après la clôture de l’exercice.” Payment of the dividend must take place within nine months after the close of the financial year. Only a court decision can extend this period. For a company whose year ends on 31 December, the dividend voted at the spring meeting must therefore be in your account by 30 September at the latest. Missing this deadline does not cancel the dividend, but it exposes the company to a shareholder action and to interest, and it signals poor management if a dispute later arises. If cash is tight, it is better to vote a smaller dividend on time than a large one you cannot pay.

Pay by bank transfer from the company account to your personal account, and keep the transfer slip. From a foreign founder’s perspective, this bank trail is the single most valuable piece of evidence in the file. It proves the date of payment, which starts the clock for the withholding tax return and for the nine-month deadline. It proves the amount, which must match the minutes and the tax return to the euro. And it proves the beneficiary, which matters because the reduced treaty rate depends on who actually receives the money. Avoid cash, avoid netting the dividend against sums you owe the company, and avoid routing the payment through a third account. Each of these shortcuts creates a mismatch between the minutes, the bank statements and the tax return, and mismatches are what tax auditors investigate first.

Three documents complete the payment file. The first is the minutes of the meeting that approved the accounts and voted the dividend, signed and kept in the company’s records. The second is the updated shareholder position: a transfer of funds to someone who is not recorded as a shareholder raises immediate questions, so make sure the share register and the minutes reflect your holding before the money moves. The third is the company’s own identity paperwork: any foreign bank receiving the funds may ask for proof that the paying company exists and that the signatory had authority, which in France means the Kbis, the official identity certificate of the company issued by the greffe, the clerk’s office of the commercial court. Order a recent Kbis online before the distribution so the payment is never blocked by an expired document.

The company must also declare the payment to the French tax administration. The French company acts as the collecting agent of the withholding tax: it deducts the levy from your dividend, pays it to the Treasury with the specific return for tax on investment income, and gives you a statement showing the gross dividend, the tax withheld and the net amount transferred. This statement is essential because your country of residence will usually tax the same dividend again, and it will only grant a foreign tax credit if you prove the French tax was actually levied. Keep the statement with your foreign tax return. The paying agent’s duties are not a formality. Article 242 ter of the General Tax Code requires that “les personnes qui assurent le paiement des revenus de capitaux mobiliers visés aux articles 108 à 125 ainsi que des produits des bons ou contrats de capitalisation et placements de même nature sont tenues de déclarer l’identité et l’adresse des bénéficiaires ainsi que, par nature de revenus, le détail du montant imposable et du crédit d’impôt, le revenu brut soumis à un prélèvement et le montant dudit prélèvement et le montant des revenus exonérés”. Every person who pays investment income must declare the identity and address of the recipients and, by category of income, the taxable amount, the gross income subject to a levy, the amount of that levy and the exempt amounts. In a dispute between a French taxpayer and a foreign paying bank, the Paris Court of Appeal recalled this exact duty in Paris Court of Appeal, 6 March 2025, case no. 20/12351, where a client accused the Danish bank Jyske Bank of failing in its duties as paying agent for French investment income. The lesson runs both ways: when your French company pays you abroad, it is the paying agent, and its declarations must be complete and consistent with what you received.

One final corporate step is often forgotten by founders living abroad. If the dividend is paid to a foreign parent company rather than to you personally, the French subsidiary must still be able to show the chain of ownership: the parent’s certificate of incorporation, the resolution approving the accounts in the French subsidiary, and proof that the parent is the real economic owner of the shares. These documents are the foundation of the tax exemption examined in the second part. Gather them before the payment, not after the tax administration asks.

II. Keeping the Tax Bill Down and Reclaiming What France Kept Too Much

A. The Withholding Tax, the Treaty Rate and the European Parent Company That May Pay Nothing at All

When a French company pays a dividend to a shareholder who is not a French tax resident, France taxes first and asks questions later. Article 119 bis of the General Tax Code provides: “Les produits visés aux articles 108 à 117 bis donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source dont le taux est fixé par l’article 187 lorsque leurs bénéficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur siège en France”. Income covered by Articles 108 to 117 bis is subject to a withholding tax at the rate set by Article 187 when the beneficial owners are persons who do not have their tax domicile or registered office in France. The key words are beneficial owners: the levy applies to the person who truly receives the income, not to a nominee or conduit, and the treaty benefit follows the same person. Note the contrast with a shareholder who lives in France. Article 117 quater of the General Tax Code states: “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’ article 4 B qui bénéficient de revenus distribués mentionnés aux articles 108 à 117 bis et 120 à 123 bis sont assujetties à un prélèvement au taux de 12,8 % .” Individuals domiciled in France for tax purposes who receive distributed income are subject to a levy at the rate of 12.8 percent. A resident individual may also, under conditions, opt for taxation at the progressive income-tax scale, in which case Article 158 of the General Tax Code provides that qualifying dividends “sont réduits, pour le calcul de l’impôt sur le revenu, d’un abattement égal à 40 % de leur montant brut perçu”, reduced by an allowance equal to 40 percent of the gross amount received. As a non-resident, you do not get the 12.8 percent advance levy or the 40 percent allowance. Your regime is the withholding tax, and your relief comes from the treaty signed between France and your country of residence.

The domestic withholding rates are set by Article 187 of the General Tax Code: “2° 12,8 % pour les bénéficiaires personnes physiques.” 12.8 percent for individual beneficiaries. For dividends paid to a foreign company, the same article refers to “Celui prévu au deuxième alinéa du I de l’article 219 pour tous les autres revenus”, the rate provided for in the second paragraph of Article 219 section I for all other income, which is the standard corporation-tax rate, and Article 219 of the General Tax Code confirms: “Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %.” The standard rate of the tax is set at 25 percent. In plain terms, without a treaty, an individual shareholder living abroad suffers a 12.8 percent French levy and a corporate shareholder suffers 25 percent, each before any tax in the country of residence. These domestic rates are only the starting point, because France has signed bilateral tax treaties with most countries, and nearly every treaty caps the French withholding on dividends at a lower rate, commonly 15 percent for portfolio shareholders and 5 percent or zero for direct corporate investors above a holding threshold, with the exact figures varying treaty by treaty.

To obtain the treaty rate at the time of payment, the shareholder must prove foreign residence to the French paying company before the dividend is paid. In practice this means a certificate of tax residence issued by the foreign administration for the year of payment, or the standard French claim forms for treaty relief, completed, certified by the foreign tax authority and delivered to the company in time for it to apply the reduced rate on the withholding return. If the certificate arrives late, the company must apply the domestic rate and the shareholder must reclaim the difference afterwards, a slower procedure examined below. For a founder who moves between countries, the decisive factor is residence at the date of payment, not at the date of the vote: a shareholder resident in the United Kingdom when the dividend is paid is treated under the France-United Kingdom treaty even if the vote took place while living elsewhere, and the file must contain the residence proof matching the payment date.

A stronger relief exists for dividends paid to a European parent company. Article 119 ter of the General Tax Code provides: “La retenue à la source prévue au 2 de l’article 119 bis n’est pas applicable aux dividendes distribués à une personne morale qui remplit les conditions énumérées au 2 du présent article par une société ou un organisme soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés au taux normal.” The withholding tax under Article 119 bis section 2 does not apply to dividends distributed to a legal entity meeting the conditions listed in section 2 of the article by a company subject to corporation tax at the standard rate. The conditions include having its place of effective management in a European Union member state or in another European Economic Area state that has an administrative assistance agreement with France, taking one of the qualifying corporate forms listed in the European parent-subsidiary directive, being the beneficial owner of the dividends, and holding the shares under the required conditions of proportion and duration. A British, American or Gulf holding company outside this framework cannot use the exemption, but a German, Spanish, Dutch or Irish parent that genuinely holds and manages the French subsidiary usually can. The exemption is not automatic: the parent must deliver to the French payer a certificate confirming each condition, and the administration may challenge artificial arrangements where the parent is an empty shell inserted only to capture the exemption. Where the recipient is not you personally but a foreign parent company inside a group, the dedicated procedure is described in our guide to paying dividends from a French subsidiary to a foreign parent, withholding tax, treaty relief and how to recover or contest the charge.

The mirror situation deserves one paragraph, because foreign founders often hold both statuses in sequence. If you move back to France and become a French tax resident, dividends from foreign companies you own fall under Article 120 of the General Tax Code, which treats dividends, interest and all other income from shares of companies whose registered office is abroad as taxable revenue in France. The withholding suffered abroad is then credited against French tax within the limits of the applicable treaty. Keep the foreign withholding certificates from the start of your investment: they become the proof for the French tax credit on your return.

B. Deadlines, Reclaims and Challenges: Forms, the Strict Time Limit and What the Courts Do With an Excessive Levy

When the domestic rate has been applied although a lower treaty rate was available, the overpaid tax is not lost, but recovering it requires a formal reclaim within a strict deadline. The shareholder, or the paying company acting on the shareholder’s behalf, files a refund claim with the French tax administration supported by the residence certificate for the year of payment, the statement showing the gross dividend and the tax withheld, and the certified treaty form. The administration verifies that the claimant was the beneficial owner and was resident in the treaty state at the payment date, then refunds the difference between the domestic levy and the treaty rate. The trap is the calendar. Article R*196-1 of the Tax Procedures Book requires: “Pour être recevables, les réclamations relatives aux impôts autres que les impôts directs locaux et les taxes annexes à ces impôts, doivent être présentées à l’administration au plus tard le 31 décembre de la deuxième année suivant celle”, to be admissible, claims concerning taxes other than local direct taxes must be submitted to the administration no later than 31 December of the second year following the relevant event, which for a withholding tax means the year of payment. A dividend paid in March 2026 and overtaxed must therefore be challenged by 31 December 2028, and a claim filed in January 2029 is inadmissible however well founded. Diarise this deadline on the day the dividend is paid, because neither the accountant nor the administration will remind you.

A recent Paris ruling shows how expensive a missed treaty rate becomes over several years, and who pays for the error. In Paris Court of Appeal, 15 September 2026, case no. 24/06926, a French national who had been resident in the United Kingdom and then in Spain received dividends from his French company between 2010 and 2018. The facts recorded by the court state: “il a été retenu à la source un taux de prélèvement libératoire de 25% lorsque M.[K] était résident au Royaume-Uni et de 21% lorsqu’il était résident en Espagne.” A final withholding rate of 25 percent was applied while he was resident in the United Kingdom and 21 percent while he was resident in Spain. The shareholder argued that the accounting firm handling the company’s tax returns should have applied the 15 percent rate resulting from the tax treaty between France and Spain on the withholding return for investment income, and that persisting with the wrong rate for six years was professional negligence. The trial court had dismissed the claim, but the Court of Appeal reversed, holding the firm liable for the excess tax caused by the wrong rate. Its operative part reads: “Condamne la société Arfeuille et Associés à payer à M.[N] [K] une somme de 50.040 euros à titre de dommages et intérêts, avec intérêts au taux légal à compter du présent arrêt,” the firm is ordered to pay 50,040 euros in damages with statutory interest running from the ruling. Three lessons follow for any foreign shareholder. First, the treaty rate must be checked before each distribution, not discovered years later, because the gap between 21 and 15 percent compounded over six years of dividends produced a five-figure loss. Second, the professional handling the withholding return can be held liable for the difference when the error is characterised, so give your accountant the residence certificate early and keep written proof that you did. Third, act as soon as an error is suspected: in that case the insurer had argued that the five-year limitation for professional liability had started running when the shareholder first learned of the reduced rate, and only prompt proceedings preserved the claim.

If the administration rejects the refund claim, expressly or by remaining silent for six months, the shareholder can take the dispute to the administrative court. The claim before the court must repeat exactly the grounds raised in the administrative complaint, supported by the same residence and payment evidence, and it must be filed within two months of the rejection. Parallel double taxation in the country of residence is handled separately: most treaties require the residence state to grant a credit for the French tax, but only up to the amount France was entitled to levy under the treaty. If France withheld 25 percent when the treaty allowed 15, the residence state will typically credit only 15, and the remaining 10 points must be recovered from France through the reclaim procedure, not from the other state. This is why the French refund comes first in every strategy: it determines the credit available everywhere else.

Two final safeguards protect the file. Keep every document for at least six years after the payment: minutes, transfer slips, withholding statements, residence certificates, certified treaty forms and the correspondence with the accountant. French limitation periods for tax reassessment and for professional liability claims make old files resurface, and the party with complete paperwork wins those late disputes. And review the structure before the profits grow large: a founder who takes dividends personally from abroad every year may find that interposing a European holding company, relocating residence, or combining a reasonable director’s remuneration with dividends changes the total burden lawfully. Each option has its own conditions and its own anti-abuse limits, and each must be put in place before the distribution is voted, never backdated afterwards.

Conclusion

Taking profit out of a French company while living abroad is a two-step operation in which neither step forgives improvisation. The dividend must be voted out of genuine distributable profit, documented in proper minutes and paid within nine months of the year end, or it risks reclassification as a fictitious distribution. Then the French withholding must be set at the correct rate from the start: the domestic levy for individuals and companies, reduced by the treaty of the country where you actually lived on the payment date, or eliminated entirely where a qualifying European parent receives the dividend. The residence certificate delivered before payment is worth more than any reclaim filed afterwards, and the reclaim itself dies on 31 December of the second year after payment if you let the deadline pass. The Paris ruling of September 2026 puts a number on neglect: six years at the wrong rate cost one shareholder more than 50,000 euros, recovered only through litigation against his own adviser. Build the file in the right order, vote first, prove residence early, withhold at the treaty rate, and keep every slip. The money will then cross the border lawfully, with nothing left behind that was yours to keep.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
2 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
3 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago