Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Married to a French Citizen After Brexit: How a British Spouse Secures the Vie Privee et Familiale Card, Works at Once, and Challenges a Refusal or OQTF

Since 1 January 2021, a British citizen married to a French citizen has been treated as any other third-country national family member. There is no more free movement, no more automatic right to live in France, and no more European residence card issued almost as a formality. The route that replaces it is the carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention « vie privée et familiale », that is, the temporary residence permit marked private and family life issued to the foreign spouse of a French national. For couples who married in Gretna Green or in a London register office, who live between Kent and the Dordogne, or who plan to settle in Paris after years in Manchester, this card decides everything: the right to enter and remain, the right to work from day one without a separate work authorisation, the path to the ten-year resident card, and later the option of French nationality by marriage.

This guide explains the spouse-of-French route as it applies to British citizens after Brexit. It covers the two entry paths that matter in practice, the three statutory conditions that every prefecture (préfecture, the local state authority that issues residence permits) checks, the documents that prove a genuine shared life (communauté de vie), the immediate right to work, the bridge to the ten-year carte de résident, and the remedies when the prefecture refuses, withdraws, or adds an order to leave France (obligation de quitter le territoire français, known as OQTF). Throughout, French terms are explained at first use, and every decisive proposition is tied to the statute or to published case law read for this article.

Two warnings shape the whole subject. First, marriage alone is never enough. The prefecture must be satisfied that the shared life has not ceased, that the French spouse has kept French nationality, and, where the wedding took place outside France, that it has been transcribed into the French civil-status registers. Second, a British spouse who simply arrives visa-free for ninety days and then applies from inside France will in most cases be told to go back and apply for the correct long-stay visa. Choosing the wrong entry route is the most common and most expensive mistake in these files.

I. How a British spouse qualifies for the vie privée et familiale card after Brexit

A. Which entry route gives you the one-year spouse card and the right to work at once?

British citizens are visa-exempt for short stays in the Schengen area, but settlement as the spouse of a French citizen still runs through the long-stay visa system. The starting rule is stated in Article L412-1 of the Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile, the code governing entry and residence of foreigners, usually shortened to CESEDA: “Sous réserve des engagements internationaux de la France et des exceptions prévues aux articles L. 412-2 et L. 412-3, la première délivrance d’une carte de séjour temporaire ou d’une carte de séjour pluriannuelle est subordonnée à la production par l’étranger du visa de long séjour mentionné aux 1° ou 2° de l’article L. 411-1.” In plain English, the first temporary card normally requires a long-stay visa, and the British passport does not exempt you.

For a British husband or wife of a French citizen, the relevant card is created by Article L423-1 CESEDA: “L’étranger marié avec un ressortissant français, se voit délivrer une carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention ” vie privée et familiale ” d’une durée d’un an lorsque les conditions suivantes sont réunies : 1° La communauté de vie n’a pas cessé depuis le mariage ; 2° Le conjoint a conservé la nationalité française ; 3° Lorsque le mariage a été célébré à l’étranger, il a été transcrit préalablement sur les registres de l’état civil français.” The official service-public.fr guidance for the card confirms the same three points in its English pages: the spouse must have been French on the wedding day and must still be French, there must be no polygamy, and a marriage celebrated abroad must have been transcribed through the French consulate before it is recognised in France. The English service-public.fr page also confirms the central practical advantage of this card: “The residence card private and family life authorizes you to stay in France. It allows you to work. Your employer does not have to apply for a work permit.” That sentence matters enormously for British spouses who want to take a job in Paris, Lyon or Bordeaux without waiting for a separate labour-market test.

In practice, consulates issue a long-stay visa as spouse of a French citizen (visa de long séjour conjoint de Français) after checking the marriage certificate or transcription, the French nationality of the spouse, and the absence of fraud. On arrival, the visa is validated online as a visa de long séjour valant titre de séjour, a long-stay visa that counts as a residence permit, and at the end of the first year the holder applies on the ANEF platform (Administration numérique des étrangers en France, the online foreigners portal) for the one-year vie privée et familiale card. That renewal is the moment when the prefecture re-examines the three statutory conditions. Couples who married abroad should therefore start transcription months before the visa application, because without transcription the visa and then the card cannot be issued under Article L423-1. Where the marriage certificate is in English, a translation by a sworn translator (traducteur assermenté) is required, and in some cases legalisation by apostille is needed as well.

There is one narrow alternative for a British citizen already in France. Article L423-2 CESEDA provides: “L’étranger, entré régulièrement et marié en France avec un ressortissant français avec lequel il justifie d’une vie commune et effective de six mois en France, se voit délivrer une carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention ” vie privée et familiale ” d’une durée d’un an. La condition prévue à l’article L. 412-1 n’est pas opposable.” This is the only spouse route that expressly waives the long-stay visa requirement. It helps, for example, a British visitor who entered visa-free, married at the local town hall (mairie) in France, and then built six months of proven shared life in France. The service-public.fr English page mirrors this: a person who entered on a short-stay visa and married in France to a French national with whom there is six months of shared and effective life in France can receive the one-year card. Outside that precise fact pattern, a British citizen who entered visa-free, married abroad, or cannot show six months of shared life in France after a wedding in France should expect the prefecture to insist on return to the United Kingdom for the correct long-stay visa. The general newcomer route, described in our companion guide on long-stay visas and first cards for British newcomers, remains the safer framework for planning entry.

Two related points complete the picture. First, the card marked vie privée et familiale as spouse of a French citizen gives an immediate and full right to work as an employee or on a self-employed basis, unlike student or visitor cards. Employers sometimes still ask for an autorisation de travail, a work authorisation, out of habit with other statuses. For this card, no such authorisation is needed, and a refusal to hire on that ground can be answered by showing the card and the service-public.fr wording quoted above. Second, the card is valid for one year and renewable as long as the marriage and the shared life continue. It also protects residence during renewal: where a renewal was lodged before expiry, Article L433-3 CESEDA allows the holder to prove lawful stay with the expired card for up to three months and provides that the foreigner keeps full social rights and the right to work while the administration decides. Keep the ANEF receipt (récépissé or attestation de décision favorable) with the expired card, because employers and social-security bodies ask for it.

B. How do you prove the marriage, the transcription and the continuing shared life?

Prefectures refuse more spouse files on evidence than on any point of law. The three statutory conditions look simple, yet each generates its own paper trail, and British-generated documents need extra steps to be accepted in France.

The first condition is an existing and genuine marriage to a person who is and remains French. Proof means the full marriage certificate (copie intégrale d’acte de mariage) or, for a wedding celebrated in the United Kingdom, the transcription certificate issued after the French consulate has copied the foreign record into the French registers. Transcription is not a second wedding. It is the administrative step by which France recognises a marriage celebrated under foreign forms. The consulate checks capacity, consent, publication of banns where required, and the absence of bigamy or forced marriage, and may interview one or both spouses. Couples married in England and Wales should provide the GRO marriage certificate, proof of the French spouse’s nationality on the wedding day and on the application day, such as a valid French passport or national identity card or a certificate of French nationality less than six months old, and proof that the marriage was reported where the couple lived. Allow several months. A visa or card application lodged before transcription is complete will stall.

The evidential value of foreign civil-status records is governed by Article 47 of the Civil Code: “Tout acte de l’état civil des Français et des étrangers fait en pays étranger et rédigé dans les formes usitées dans ce pays fait foi, sauf si d’autres actes ou pièces détenus, des données extérieures ou des éléments tirés de l’acte lui-même établissent, le cas échéant après toutes vérifications utiles, que cet acte est irrégulier, falsifié ou que les faits qui y sont déclarés ne correspondent pas à la réalité. Celle-ci est appréciée au regard de la loi française.” In practice, that means a proper English marriage certificate is accepted unless the administration has concrete material showing irregularity or falsity. It does not mean that any English document proves French nationality or proves that the couple still live together. Those points need their own evidence.

The second condition, the continuing shared life, is where British couples most often underestimate the file. Communauté de vie means more than being married on paper. Case law requires a material element, living under the same roof and sharing daily expenses, and an intentional element, the mutual wish to live durably as a couple. The Lyon administrative court of appeal put the limit on judicial curiosity clearly in a spouse case on 5 February 2025, CAA Lyon 24LY00280: “alors qu’il n’appartient ni à l’administration ni au juge d’apprécier la réalité des sentiments partagés par les époux dans le cadre du mariage”. The court looks at facts, not at love. In that case, the prefecture had relied on remarks by an elderly French husband about wishing to “offer” French nationality to his much younger Tunisian wife and about her finding a new partner after his death. The court held that those remarks did not show that the wedding, more than six years earlier, had been concluded for a purpose foreign to marriage, and that stays of nearly eight weeks a year with family abroad did not break the shared life where the couple shared a two-room flat and the wife held an open-ended employment contract in France. British couples should read that reasoning as a checklist: joint lease or title deeds, joint tax notices (avis d’imposition), joint bank statements, electricity and broadband bills in both names, home insurance naming both spouses, correspondence received at the shared address, and evidence of daily life together. Short trips back to see parents in Bristol or Leeds do not break shared life. Separate addresses, separate finances with no explanation, and contradictory statements during a home visit or hearing do.

British specifics deserve attention. Couples who kept a house in the United Kingdom while renting in France should explain the arrangement in a short signed statement (attestation sur l’honneur de vie commune) and back it with travel records and bills for both homes. Couples where the French spouse works in London during the week and returns to France should keep transport tickets and employer letters. Where the spouses chose different surnames, which is common for British wives, the file should state the birth name and the married name clearly so that the prefecture does not treat correspondence in different names as evidence of separation. All English-language documents should be translated by a sworn translator, and GRO certificates should carry an apostille where the prefecture or consulate asks for it. Organise the file chronologically from the wedding to the application date, with at least one joint document for every quarter. A thin file invites a home enquiry (enquête de communauté de vie); a thick, ordered file often avoids one.

The third condition, French nationality retained by the spouse, is usually straightforward but still proved. A valid French passport or identity card at the application date is the simplest evidence. Where nationality derives from a parent or from naturalisation rather than birth in France, add the certificate of French nationality or the relevant decree. If the French spouse also holds British nationality, show both passports and make clear that French nationality has not been renounced. Loss or renunciation of French nationality during the marriage destroys eligibility for the spouse card, even if the couple still live together.

II. How a British spouse builds long-term security and answers a refusal, a withdrawal or an OQTF

A. When does the one-year card lead to the ten-year resident card and to French nationality by marriage?

One year of marriage plus one year of residence does not yet give permanent security. The bridge to durable status is the ten-year card as spouse of a French citizen, created by Article L423-6 CESEDA: “L’étranger marié depuis au moins trois ans avec un ressortissant français se voit délivrer une carte de résident d’une durée de dix ans à condition qu’il séjourne régulièrement en France depuis trois ans et que la communauté de vie entre les époux n’ait pas cessé depuis le mariage, que le conjoint ait conservé la nationalité française et, lorsque le mariage a été célébré à l’étranger, qu’il ait été transcrit préalablement sur les registres de l’état civil français.” Three cumulative clocks therefore run together: at least three years of marriage, at least three years of lawful residence in France, and an unbroken shared life with a spouse who is still French and whose foreign wedding remains transcribed.

The same article adds a republican-integration condition and a withdrawal rule that British applicants sometimes discover late. Issue of the ten-year card is subject to republican integration assessed under Article L413-7 CESEDA, which looks in particular at the result in a civic examination and at a command of French sufficient to understand clear conversation, to produce simple and coherent speech on everyday subjects, and to set out an idea briefly, with the mayor consulted for an opinion. In plain terms, attending the civic training, passing the test, and reaching a functional spoken level matter. The article also provides that the card may be withdrawn if shared life breaks within four years of the wedding, while protecting cases where the break comes from death or from domestic or family violence, and protecting a parent who effectively supports children born of the union under Article 371-2 of the Civil Code standards. The mirror rule for the one-year card is Article L423-3 CESEDA: “Lorsque la rupture du lien conjugal ou la rupture de la vie commune est constatée au cours de la durée de validité de la carte de séjour prévue aux articles L. 423-1 ou L. 423-2, cette dernière peut être retirée. Le renouvellement de la carte est subordonné au maintien du lien conjugal et de la communauté de vie avec le conjoint qui doit avoir conservé la nationalité française.” Separation, divorce, or moving into separate homes without explanation therefore puts renewal at risk, while death and proven domestic violence are treated differently and should be documented by death certificates, complaints, protection orders or convictions.

British couples should plan the three-year clocks from the start. Lawful residence means continuous cover by a valid visa, card or renewal receipt; a gap caused by a late renewal application can break the three-year count and push the ten-year card back by a year. Keep every ANEF confirmation, every receipt, and every expired card. Where the prefecture is slow, the receipt plus the expired card proves lawful stay under Article L433-3 and preserves work and social rights while the decision is pending. Where the couple moves département, re-register the address promptly, because the new prefecture will re-examine shared life from scratch.

Beyond residence, many British spouses consider French nationality by declaration through marriage. Article 21-2 of the Civil Code allows a foreigner married to a French citizen to acquire French nationality by declaration after four years from the wedding, provided that shared life, both emotional and material, has not ceased and that the French spouse has kept French nationality, with the period extended to five years where the foreigner cannot show at least three years of uninterrupted lawful residence in France since the wedding or cannot show that the French spouse was registered in the register of French citizens living abroad during their shared life abroad, and provided that a wedding celebrated abroad was transcribed beforehand and that the applicant shows sufficient knowledge of French. The nationality route therefore rewards the same facts as the residence route: transcription, continuous shared life, continuous lawful stay, and real French. It does not replace the residence card while the declaration is examined. A British citizen who becomes French keeps the practical benefits of both nationalities for travel and settlement, subject to the United Kingdom’s own rules on dual nationality, and should take advice on tax residence and on wills before the change, since nationality can affect succession planning for a French house.

A final planning point concerns children. A British parent of a French child has a separate vie privée et familiale route as parent, and a British child born in France may have nationality and residence rights of its own. Those routes are outside this article, but their existence explains why prefectures ask systematically whether children were born of the union and who supports them. A couple with children should add birth certificates, school certificates, and evidence of joint parental support to the spouse file. It strengthens both renewal and any later nationality declaration.

B. How do you challenge a refusal, a withdrawal or an OQTF without losing lawful stay?

Refusals in spouse files usually fall into four groups: missing transcription, insufficient proof of shared life, doubts about the French spouse’s nationality or about fraud, and public-order objections. Each has a different answer, and the remedy depends on what else was notified with the refusal.

Start with the paper decision. A refusal to issue or renew a temporary card or a resident card on public-order grounds must be reasoned, under Article L432-1 CESEDA: “La délivrance d’une carte de séjour temporaire ou pluriannuelle ou d’une carte de résident peut, par une décision motivée, être refusée à tout étranger dont la présence en France constitue une menace pour l’ordre public”. The Paris administrative court of appeal applied that test strictly to a long-standing spouse of a French citizen on 16 October 2025, CAA Paris 25PA00889. The prefecture had relied on a 2013 shoplifting and irregular-entry record and a 2021 driving-without-insurance matter to brand the husband a threat. The court held that “compte tenu de la nature et de l’ancienneté de ces faits, ceux-ci ne sont pas de nature à établir que la présence en France de M. B… constituerait une menace pour l’ordre public”, annulled the refusal, and ordered the prefecture to issue the ten-year resident card within three months. British spouses with an old caution, a spent motoring matter, or a single minor incident should therefore ask the prefecture to weigh nature, age, and subsequent conduct, and should produce rehabilitation, employment, tax, and family evidence rather than leaving the police record to speak alone. A bare list of old entries without analysis of present dangerousness is vulnerable on appeal.

Where shared life is disputed, answer with documents, not adjectives. File a prompt hierarchical appeal (recours hiérarchique to the minister) or informal appeal (recours gracieux to the prefect) only where it adds evidence, because time limits for the court continue to run. The effective remedy against a refusal coupled with an OQTF is the action before the administrative court (tribunal administratif). Article L611-1 CESEDA lists the cases in which the administration may order a foreigner to leave France, including where stay is without a valid permit or where a title has been refused or withdrawn. Article L614-1 CESEDA then provides that the OQTF, the linked residence, voluntary-departure and return-ban decisions may be challenged before the administrative court. In spouse cases, the court examines both the legality of the refusal and, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, whether removal would disproportionately interfere with private and family life. A British spouse with a French partner, a shared home, employment, and integration in France should therefore plead Article 8 alongside the statutory spouse provisions, with dated proof for each year of shared life.

Withdrawal during the card’s validity follows the same logic. Under Article L423-3, a break in the marriage or in shared life found during the one-year validity may lead to withdrawal, and renewal requires the marriage and shared life to continue with a spouse who is still French. If the couple separate temporarily for work or family reasons but the marriage continues and a common home is kept, explain the arrangement with documents before the prefecture treats absence as rupture. If violence caused the separation, say so early and produce the complaint, protection order, medical certificates or conviction, because the statute and the ten-year-card rules protect victims from withdrawal on that ground. If the French spouse dies, produce the death certificate promptly and ask for re-examination on another ground, such as parent of a French child or exceptional admission, rather than letting the file close by default.

Deadlines and stay rights decide tactics. An OQTF with thirty days to leave voluntarily is challenged within that period; an OQTF without voluntary departure, often linked to detention or a return ban, has a much shorter forty-eight-hour limit. Filing within time suspends removal until the judge rules in most spouse configurations, but travel outside France while the case is pending can complicate proof of presence and should be avoided without advice. Always keep the withdrawal or refusal letter, the OQTF with its country of destination, the ANEF history, and the proof of posting or electronic filing. Ask the court for a stay where needed, for annulment of each linked decision, and for an injunction to issue a receipt authorising work pending re-examination. The Lyon case above shows what a well-documented shared life achieves: the first judges annulled the refusal and OQTF and ordered a ten-year card with work rights, and the court of appeal rejected the prefecture’s appeal because eight weeks of family visits and clumsy remarks about nationality did not displace the lease, the open-ended job, and the long marriage.

British-specific pitfalls recur. Do not let a ninety-day visa-free stay drift into overstay while waiting for transcription or for six months of shared life to accrue; an overstay followed by an application invites refusal plus OQTF, as explained in our guide on overstays and entry bans for British citizens. Do not assume that a Withdrawal Agreement card, a visitor card, or a talent-family card converts automatically into a spouse card; each status has its own conditions, and the spouse route must be applied for on its own facts. Do not leave the United Kingdom without checking the travel document: a spouse with only an ANEF receipt and no valid card or travel endorsement may struggle to re-enter. Finally, do not ignore the integration steps. Enrol in the civic and language training when summoned by the French Office for Immigration and Integration (Office français de l’immigration et de l’intégration, known as OFII), sit the examination, and keep the certificates. They count for the ten-year card under Article L413-7 and for nationality under Article 21-2, and their absence is a needless ground for delay.

Conclusion

For a British citizen married to a French citizen, Brexit did not close the door to France. It channelled settlement through a demanding but navigable spouse route. Enter on the correct long-stay visa as spouse of a French citizen unless you precisely meet the six-months-in-France marriage exception, transcribe a British wedding before applying, prove an unbroken shared life with joint documents for every quarter, show that the French spouse is and remains French, and use the immediate right to work that the vie privée et familiale card confers. Treat the one-year card as the foundation for the ten-year carte de résident after three years of marriage and three years of lawful stay, and for French nationality by declaration after four or five years, with language and civic integration built steadily rather than left to the last month. Where the prefecture refuses or withdraws on transcription, evidence, or public-order grounds, or adds an OQTF, challenge quickly before the administrative court with a complete file and Article 8 alongside the CESEDA spouse provisions. Courts annul refusals that rest on stale or minor police entries, on sentiment rather than facts, or on visits home mistaken for rupture. Prepared as a jurist would prepare it, the spouse file turns marriage into durable residence.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
3 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
1 week ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
2 weeks ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
4 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
4 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago