Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Freelancer in France After Brexit: Entrepreneur Visa, Micro-Entrepreneur Tax and How to Challenge a Refusal

Since 1 January 2021, a British passport no longer opens the French labour market. The end of free movement means that a consultant in Manchester, a designer in Bristol, a translator in Edinburgh or an IT contractor in London who wants to live in Paris, Lyon or the Dordogne and work for their own clients is treated as a third-country national. That single change shapes everything: entry, residence, registration, tax and social charges. There is no British shortcut, no retained right to set up as self-employed, and no way to regularise a freelance life in France from a short visitor stay.

The route that matters for most independent Britons is the entrepreneur / profession libérale card. The first term, entrepreneur, covers commercial, craft and industrial self-employment. The second, profession libérale, covers independent intellectual work such as consulting, translating, design, software development, coaching, training and many advisory activities. The residence card and the tax regime are two different things that newcomers constantly confuse. The card gives the right to stay and to work for yourself. The micro-entrepreneur regime, formerly called auto-entrepreneur, is the simplified way of paying income tax and social contributions on freelance turnover. You need both, and each has its own refusals, deadlines and remedies.

This guide explains, for a British reader, how to obtain the long-stay visa and the residence card as a freelancer after Brexit, how to register and pay as a micro-entrepreneur, what level of income the préfecture, the administrative authority headed by the préfet in each département, actually expects, and how to challenge a refusal, a non-renewal, an obligation to leave France or a removal from the micro-entrepreneur regime. Every decisive legal statement below is anchored in a verified statute or a real court decision, quoted word for word, with an official link. French terms are explained the first time they appear.

I. How does a British freelancer obtain the entrepreneur / profession libérale visa and residence card after Brexit?

A. Which long-stay visa and which residence card does a British self-employed newcomer need?

Any Briton who wants to live in France for more than three months must hold a residence document. French law puts the rule in plain terms: tout étranger âgé de plus de dix-huit ans qui souhaite séjourner en France pour une durée supérieure à trois mois doit être titulaire de l’un des documents de séjour suivants, which means that any foreigner over eighteen who wishes to stay in France for longer than three months must hold one of the listed residence documents, starting with a long-stay visa, a visa de long séjour. A British freelancer therefore starts at the French visa centre in the United Kingdom, through the France-Visas system and its contractor, before travelling. Arrival on a visa waiver or a short Schengen stay followed by an in-country application as a freelancer is not the normal path and exposes the applicant to a refusal for irregular entry or stay.

The key residence card is the carte de séjour temporaire, the temporary residence card, bearing the mention entrepreneur / profession libérale. The statute that creates it states: L’étranger qui exerce une activité non salariée, économiquement viable et dont il tire des moyens d’existence suffisants, dans le respect de la législation en vigueur, se voit délivrer une carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention ” entrepreneur/ profession libérale ” d’une durée maximale d’un an. In plain English, the foreigner who carries on a non-salaried activity that is economically viable and provides sufficient means of existence, in compliance with the legislation in force, is issued a temporary residence card marked entrepreneur / self-employed professional for a maximum of one year. Three conditions therefore decide every file: genuine self-employment, economic viability and sufficient income, all within the law. The broader hub guide for British newcomers, which maps every long-stay visa and every carte de séjour and the remedies against a refusal or an removal order, is the companion to this article: British Newcomer Needs a French Visa After Brexit: Which Long-Stay Visa, Which Carte de Sejour, and How to Challenge a Refusal or OQTF.

The visa application itself is decided on the business project. The official France-Visas page for self-employed or liberal activity sets out the exercise: describe the activity, show qualifications or experience where the profession requires them, present a forecast budget, show funds available for the launch, and, for regulated professions, show the diploma, authorisation or registration the French rules demand. The Business France welcome portal describes the same temporary entrepreneur card as the status for foreign company founders and self-employed professionals setting up in France. Both pages are official and both point in the same direction: the consulate wants evidence that the business will really trade, not an idea on one page. Practical files that succeed typically contain a two-year forecast profit and loss account, letters of intent or draft contracts from clients, proof of professional indemnity insurance where relevant, a French business bank account or funds earmarked for the launch, and, for translators, consultants or IT contractors, CVs, references and examples of past billings in the United Kingdom.

British applicants should organise the regulated-activity question before filing. A management consultant, a translator, a software developer or a designer working as a profession libérale normally registers only with the social and tax bodies. A builder, plumber, electrician or hairdresser is an artisan and must register with the chambre de métiers et de l’artisanat, the craft chamber, and hold the required qualification. A person selling goods is a commerçant, a trader, registered with the registre du commerce et des sociétés, the companies and trade register. Qualification checks, honourability conditions and insurance obligations can delay the visa, so a British tradesperson who applies as a liberal professional to avoid them risks a refusal for non-compliance with the legislation in force. Choose the right box from the start and evidence it.

Once in France on the correct long-stay visa, the newcomer applies to the préfecture of the place of residence for the card itself. In Paris that means the Préfecture de police de Paris, which handles a very large volume of foreign business files and applies the viability test strictly. The card is issued for up to one year and is renewable for as long as the conditions remain met. A later multi-year card, the carte de séjour pluriannuelle, exists for those who have held the temporary card and continue to meet the conditions, but the first grant and the first renewal are where British files most often fail, because the income evidence is thin. Keep every proof from day one: the visa, the entry stamp, the lease, the registration certificate, the bank statements, the invoices and the contribution receipts. A renewal file is judged on what the business actually earned, not on what the plan once promised.

B. How do you prove an economically viable activity with sufficient income?

The préfecture does not count turnover the way a newcomer counts it. Turnover, the chiffre d’affaires, is the gross amount billed. Income, for residence purposes, is what remains available to live on once the costs of the business are paid. The administrative courts have built a consistent method around that distinction, and two appeal decisions show exactly how British-style freelance files are judged.

The leading Lyon appeal decision states the burden of proof in terms every applicant should memorise: il lui appartient de présenter à l’appui de sa demande les justificatifs permettant d’évaluer la viabilité économique de son activité ou entreprise, que celle-ci soit encore au stade de projet ou déjà créée. In other words, where the foreigner is the creator of the activity, it is for that person to supply the documents that allow the viability of the business, whether still a project or already trading, to be assessed. A forecast without clients, a client list without invoices, or invoices without bank movements will not meet that test. The court expects coherent paperwork across the chain: registration, contracts, invoices, receipts, bank credits and contribution payments.

The same decision explains the arithmetic that defeats many micro-entrepreneur files: doivent notamment être soustraites du chiffre d’affaires les charges et cotisations versées, ainsi que les dépenses professionnelles engagées. Charges, social contributions paid and professional expenditure must be deducted from turnover when assessing whether income is sufficient. The court added an important nuance for micro-entrepreneurs: the sum used to assess income cannot simply be reduced to the net taxable figure produced by applying the flat tax allowances of 71 percent, 50 percent and 34 percent for sales, commercial profits and non-commercial profits. The allowance is a tax shortcut, not a measure of money available to live on. The administration must look at real outgoings, and the applicant must evidence them, including professional expenses, which the Lyon applicant had failed to document at all.

The figures in that case are a warning. The applicant, a handyman working under the micro-entrepreneur regime in a company he had created and registered in January 2021, showed gross turnover of 20,918 euros for 2022 with 2,738 euros of contributions, but produced nothing on professional expenses, and half of the turnover had been billed in the final quarter, including an invoice of 6,079 euros dated after the contested decision. The court held that nothing in the file established sufficient means of existence at the date of the decision, and it closed with the blunt operative part: La requête de M. B… est rejetée. The application was dismissed, and the linked obligation to leave France survived with it. A British freelancer billing around twenty thousand euros gross, unevenly spread and poorly documented, should expect the same outcome.

The Paris appeal decision adds a second trap for Britons with family money. The applicant sought renewal of an entrepreneur / profession libérale card and relied in part on benefits and annuities received from his family. The court answered: Le préfet de police n’était nullement tenu de prendre en compte les avantages et rentes que le requérant perçoit de sa famille et dont il ne soutient nullement qu’ils auraient pour contrepartie une activité professionnelle. The préfet was in no way obliged to count advantages and income received from the family where the applicant did not even claim they were consideration for professional activity. The lesson is direct: only income derived from the self-employed activity counts. Savings, parental help, a partner’s salary or UK rental income may help the household in real life, but they do not prove that the freelance activity provides sufficient means. Put UK rental income in the tax return by all means, as the double tax treaty requires, but do not present it as freelance viability evidence. A related guide on declaring UK rental income while resident in France explains the treaty credit mechanism here: British in France With UK Rental Income After Brexit: How to Declare It, Claim the Treaty Credit and Challenge the Bill.

In practice, aim for a file that shows regular monthly billing, paid invoices, bank credits matching the declared turnover, contributions actually paid, and a net available income at least around the full-time minimum wage level, the SMIC, over the year, with an upward trend at renewal. There is no statutory minimum written into the entrepreneur card, which is why refusals always turn on evidence, but files below that level are routinely treated as insufficient, and files with long gaps, a single client paying late, or turnover concentrated in the weeks before the préfecture appointment are treated as fragile. Declare turnover every month or quarter from the start, even when it is small, keep the professional expense receipts separate from household spending, and never let the file show undeclared work, which destroys the condition of compliance with the legislation in force.

II. How does a British micro-entrepreneur pay tax and social charges in France, and how do you challenge a refusal or a removal?

A. How do you register, declare turnover, and pay income tax, VAT and social contributions?

Registration now runs through the guichet unique, the single online portal managed by the INPI, the French intellectual property and business formalities institute, which transmits the file to the tax office, the social bodies and the relevant register. The newcomer receives a SIREN number identifying the business and a SIRET number identifying each place of business. A profession libérale registers with the URSSAF, the body that collects social contributions, through the portal. The choice of activity code, the code APE, and the description of the activity should match the visa project, because a mismatch between the authorised activity and the registered activity can be used against the file at renewal.

The micro-entrepreneur is not a separate legal form. It is a simplified method of calculating and paying social contributions and income tax, available to a sole trader whose turnover stays within the statutory ceilings. The social side of the bargain was created by the 2008 modernisation of the economy act, and the Paris social court recalled its architecture in these terms: La loi n°2008-776 du 4 Août 2008 de modernisation de l’économie (LME) a mis en place, pour les travailleurs indépendants, un régime simplifié, meaning that the 2008 act set up a simplified regime for self-employed workers. The current social code provision states the mechanism plainly: contributions sont calculées mensuellement ou trimestriellement, en appliquant au montant de leur chiffre d’affaires ou de leurs recettes effectivement réalisés le mois ou le trimestre précédent un taux global fixé par décret pour chaque catégorie d’activité, which means they are calculated monthly or quarterly by applying to the turnover or receipts actually achieved in the previous month or quarter an overall rate fixed by decree for each category of activity. The freelancer therefore pays a percentage of what was actually billed and received, each month or each quarter as chosen at registration. There is no bill for nothing, but there is a declaration for nothing: even with no turnover, the declaration must still be filed, marked nil, on time.

Income tax follows the nature of the work. A consultant, translator, designer, developer or coach normally falls under non-commercial profits, the BNC category, taxed under the micro-BNC article. That article provides that taxable profit est égal au montant brut des recettes annuelles diminué d’un abattement forfaitaire de 34 %, which means it equals gross annual receipts less a flat allowance of 34 percent, with a minimum allowance of 305 euros, for turnover within the 83,600 euro ceiling for the prior or penultimate year that the verified version states. A trader selling goods or a host providing accommodation falls instead under commercial profits, the BIC category, under the micro-BIC article, with different ceilings and allowances that must be checked on impots.gouv.fr for the year concerned. The micro articles also impose a discipline that matters at renewal: Les contribuables visés au 1 doivent tenir et, sur demande du service des impôts, présenter un document donnant le détail journalier de leurs recettes professionnelles. Taxpayers under the regime must keep and, on request from the tax office, produce a document showing the day-by-day detail of professional receipts. Keep that receipts book from the first invoice, with client identity, amount, date and means of payment, because the same document proves both tax compliance and residence viability.

Value added tax, the TVA, is the third layer. Small businesses established in France benefit from the franchise en base, the VAT exemption for small turnover, which the code expresses as follows: les assujettis établis en France bénéficient d’une franchise qui les dispense du paiement de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée, meaning taxable persons established in France benefit from an exemption releasing them from paying VAT, while turnover stays below the stated ceilings, whose verified version sets 85,000 euros for the previous year for total national turnover and 37,500 euros for services other than catering and accommodation, with higher current-year thresholds of 93,500 and 41,250 euros. Below the ceiling, the freelancer bills without VAT and does not recover VAT on purchases, and must show the statutory mention on invoices. Above it, VAT applies from the date the threshold is crossed, with registration, VAT returns and a price adjustment with clients. British B2B clients sometimes assume UK zero-rating travels with them. It does not. French invoicing rules govern French-established work, and a file showing systematic VAT errors undermines the good-compliance image the préfecture expects.

Social protection follows payment. Contributions open health cover through the CPAM, the local health insurance fund, maternity and daily allowances under self-employed rules, basic and supplementary pension points, and family benefits, each at self-employed rates and conditions that differ from employee rights. After three months of stable and regular residence, the freelancer who is not otherwise insured can also rely on the PUMA, the universal health protection that covers residents, with possible CSM bills, the subsidised health contribution, for higher incomes that parallel guides explain. The UK Global Health Insurance Card covers only necessary care during temporary stays, not a settled freelance life, and it does not replace French affiliation. Register quickly, declare from the first period, pay on time, and keep every URSSAF receipt, because those receipts are also renewal evidence for the card.

Tax residence completes the picture. A Briton who makes France the home, the centre of economic interests or the place of habitual presence becomes a French tax resident and declares worldwide income in France, including any continuing UK freelance receipts, UK rental income and UK investment income, with the France-United Kingdom double tax treaty of 19 June 2008 allocating taxing rights and France generally granting a credit for UK tax on UK-source income taxable in both states. The UK side applies its own statutory residence test and, for the year of move, possible split-year treatment, explained on gov.uk. Keep both calendars aligned: the French year runs January to December with online returns in May and June, while the UK year runs 6 April to 5 April. A first French return uses forms 2042 for overall income and 2047 for foreign-source income, with the micro turnover already declared to URSSAF now declared for tax, and the 3916 form for any UK bank account still held. Mismatches between URSSAF declarations, bank credits and the tax return are the fastest way to attract both a tax enquiry and a residence renewal problem.

B. How do you challenge a visa refusal, a card refusal or non-renewal, an OQTF, or a removal from the micro-entrepreneur regime?

Refusals must be reasoned, and each type of refusal carries its own deadline, so the first task after a refusal is to read the letter, identify every decision it contains, and diary every time limit on the same day. A refusal of a residence card is often notified together with an obligation to leave France, the OQTF, with a departure period, a destination country and a warning about a possible entry ban. The statute lists the cases, starting with irregular entry or stay, and it expressly covers the freelancer situation: L’étranger s’est vu refuser la délivrance d’un titre de séjour, le renouvellement du titre de séjour, du document provisoire délivré à l’occasion d’une demande de titre de séjour ou de l’autorisation provisoire de séjour qui lui avait été délivré ou s’est vu retirer un de ces documents, which means the foreigner who has been refused issue or renewal of a residence card or a related provisional document, or has had one withdrawn, can be required to leave. The general power is stated at the head of the same article: L’autorité administrative peut obliger un étranger à quitter le territoire français lorsqu’il se trouve dans les cas suivants, meaning the administrative authority may require a foreigner to leave French territory in the listed cases. A separate refusal provision adds that issue of a temporary or multi-year card or a resident card may be refused by a reasoned decision where presence in France is a threat to public order: La délivrance d’une carte de séjour temporaire ou pluriannuelle ou d’une carte de résident peut, par une décision motivée, être refusée à tout étranger dont la présence en France constitue une menace pour l’ordre public. Most British freelancer refusals are not public-order cases but viability and income cases, so the reasoning will cite insufficient turnover, late or missing declarations, unproven expenses, or activity outside the authorised category.

The remedy against a card refusal and an OQTF is an action before the tribunal administratif, the administrative court, of the place of residence, normally within a short deadline stated in the notification, often thirty days for an OQTF with a departure period and forty-eight hours where there is no departure period or detention is involved. Ask a lawyer immediately which deadline appears in the letter, because the wrong assumption is fatal. The application seeks annulment of the refusal and, where needed, of the OQTF and the destination and entry-ban decisions, with an order to the préfet to re-examine the file or to issue the card, and interim relief through a référé-suspension, the urgent procedure to suspend enforcement, where removal is imminent. The Lyon and Paris cases both show applicants asking the court to order issue of the entrepreneur card within one month or fifteen days, and both show how courts decide: they re-examine the viability evidence at the date of the decision, they disregard family money that is not professional income, and they dismiss the OQTF challenge as a consequence once the refusal is confirmed lawful. Build the court file the way the court reasons: updated declarations, bank credits, paid contribution receipts, client contracts performed after the decision where the court accepts them, and a clear calculation from turnover to available income after charges, contributions and professional expenses.

Visa refusals from London follow a parallel track. The consulate must give reasons for refusing a long-stay visa, and the applicant can file a recours gracieux, an informal appeal to the authority that refused, to the visa appeals commission in Nantes, the Commission de recours contre les refus de visa, within two months, then to the tribunal administratif in Nantes which hears visa litigation. The commission stage is quick on paper and slow in reality, so applicants with a strong business file often re-apply with a reinforced project while the appeal runs, rather than waiting abroad with no income. Never travel to France to wait out a visa refusal as a visitor while trading. Working without the correct card and staying beyond the visa exposes the later file to an irregularity refusal and an OQTF on the exact ground the statute lists for staying without a valid card.

Removal from the micro-entrepreneur regime is administrative, not judicial in the first instance, and it surprises Britons who pause billing while waiting for a renewal. The Paris social court case concerned a translator registered as a micro-entrepreneur from February 2017 to December 2020 who received a letter in March 2021 ending her micro-entrepreneur status because, in the words recorded in the judgment: les micro-entrepreneurs qui déclarent un chiffre d’affaires nul pendant une période de 24 mois civils ou 8 trimestres civils consécutifs perdent le bénéfice de ce régime. Micro-entrepreneurs declaring nil turnover for 24 consecutive calendar months or 8 consecutive calendar quarters lose the benefit of the regime. She challenged the decision before the commission de recours amiable, the internal appeals commission of URSSAF, which rejected her in December 2021, then before the social division of the judicial court, which rehearsed the simplified-regime architecture before deciding. The path is therefore: read the URSSAF letter, file the CRA appeal within its two-month deadline with corrected declarations and proof of real activity, then, if rejected, bring the case before the pôle social of the tribunal judiciaire, the social division of the judicial court, with evidence of turnover, declarations and any URSSAF reminders. The deeper lesson for residence purposes is that a gap in declarations reads, to a préfet, as a gap in viability. File nil declarations rather than filing nothing, answer every URSSAF reminder, and restart billing before the renewal appointment, because a twenty-four-month hole is difficult to explain away.

For Britons in Paris and the Ile-de-France, the geography of the dispute matters. Visa holders living in the capital renew at the Préfecture de police, litigate refusals at the Tribunal administratif de Paris, and answer URSSAF Ile-de-France on contributions, exactly the combination seen in the Paris and social cases above. File early through the ANEF online system where the procedure requires it, keep the confirmation receipt, and never let the existing card expire while waiting for a slot: the receipt, the récépissé, or the attestation of extension preserves the right to stay and, depending on its wording, the right to work while the file is examined. If the récépissé does not authorise work, pause billing rather than working uncovered, and document the pause so the gap does not look like concealed activity. Bring to any lawyer meeting the full bundle in date order: passport and visa, entry proof, lease, registration certificate, APE code, every URSSAF declaration and receipt, the receipts book, bank statements showing client credits, client contracts, insurance, tax returns with foreign-income schedules, the refusal letter with its deadlines, and any OQTF with the departure period. A complete bundle allows a targeted appeal within days. An incomplete one consumes the deadline in correspondence.

Conclusion

A British freelancer succeeds in France after Brexit by treating residence and business as one file with two readers. The consulate and the préfecture read viability and sufficient professional income through banked, declared and taxed turnover, after real charges and contributions, documented from project to renewal. URSSAF and the tax office read the same turnover through monthly or quarterly declarations, a daily receipts record, correct BNC or BIC treatment, correct VAT franchise handling, and worldwide declaration once French tax residence begins. The courts, from Lyon to Paris, apply the same method: the creator proves the business with documents, family money does not count as professional income, nil or missing declarations destroy credibility, and a refusal confirmed as lawful carries the removal order with it. Organise the evidence in that order, keep declaring even in quiet months, align the visa project with the registered activity, and challenge a refusal within its stated deadline with a reinforced calculation rather than a bare protest. The freelance life in France remains fully open to Britons who can show a real business that pays its way.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
3 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
1 week ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
2 weeks ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
4 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
4 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago