Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company and Mandatory E-Invoicing Since 1 September 2026: Platform, Deadlines and Getting Paid From Abroad

You formed a company in France, you live abroad, and until recently invoicing looked like the easy part: your accountant issued PDFs, you emailed them to clients, suppliers emailed theirs, and the VAT return followed. That world ended on 1 September 2026. France has switched business-to-business invoicing to a mandatory electronic circuit, and every French company is concerned from day one, including a small SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) owned and managed from London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. This article explains, in practical terms, what your French company must do now, which deadlines apply to it, which platform it must use, which new invoice details it must show, and how you enforce payment or defend a dispute from abroad under the same rules. The reform is described on the official economy ministry page in these terms: the business-to-business e-invoicing reform took effect on 1 September 2026 (official guidance of the Ministry of the Economy on e-invoicing). From that date, the administration states: every business, whatever its size, must be able to receive electronic invoices Sending follows a staggered calendar depending on company size, and the ordinary PDF sent by email no longer counts: an administration notice warns that an invoice a scanned paper invoice, an ordinary PDF or a document sent by simple email will no longer comply. For a foreign shareholder, the risk is concrete: invoices rejected by the circuit, VAT deducted on invalid documents, late-payment interest running against you, and administrative fines. The good news is that the system, once set up, gives you real-time tracking of every invoice and a faster, cheaper way to recover unpaid bills through the French order-to-pay procedure, even from abroad.

Two warnings before we start. First, this guide concerns companies registered in France (SAS, SARL — société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company — branch or subsidiary) that invoice and receive invoices in France. If you only sell from abroad without a French establishment, different VAT rules apply. Second, acronyms are explained at first use throughout: SIREN (the nine-digit company identification number shown on the Kbis, which is the official certificate of existence issued by the greffe, the commercial court clerk), TVA (taxe sur la valeur ajoutée, the French VAT), DGFiP (Direction générale des finances publiques, the tax authority), DGCCRF (Direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes, the competition and fraud authority), PDP (plateforme agréée, the accredited private e-invoicing platform) and PPF (portail public de facturation, the free public portal), URSSAF (the social security collection agency), BODACC (the official gazette of commercial announcements) and RNE (registre national des entreprises, the national company register fed through the Guichet unique, the single online filing desk).

I. What the French E-Invoicing Mandate Requires of Your French Company

A. Which Deadlines Apply to Your Company: Receiving Now, Issuing by Size

The single most important point is that there is no grace period for receiving. Since 1 September 2026, every taxable business established in France must be able to receive electronic invoices through the mandated circuit, whatever its size and whatever the nationality or residence of its shareholders and directors. Your SAS with one shareholder living abroad and no employee in France is covered exactly like a large French group. In practice this means your company must have designated its receiving channel — a PDP of its choice or the free PPF — and must appear correctly in the national directory (annuaire) so that suppliers can route invoices to it. An invoice that cannot reach you through the circuit is not merely an administrative inconvenience: your supplier cannot discharge its own issuing obligation, your accounts payable stalls, and your VAT deduction calendar slips.

The obligation to issue electronic invoices follows a two-step calendar based on company size. Large companies (grandes entreprises) and intermediate-sized companies (entreprises de taille intermédiaire) have had to issue all their domestic business-to-business invoices in electronic format and transmit their transaction and payment data (e-reporting) since 1 September 2026. Small and medium-sized companies, micro-businesses and every small foreign-owned SAS or SARL follow on 1 September 2027: from that date they must be able to issue electronically and transmit e-reporting data. The official presentation confirms the scale: more than ten million businesses are concerned If your French company is a small structure — and most foreign founders’ vehicles are — your issuing deadline is therefore 1 September 2027, but your receiving obligation is already in force, and large customers may already require you to route through a platform simply so their own systems accept your invoices.

Do not confuse the two complementary duties. E-invoicing (e-invoicing) covers domestic transactions between VAT-registered businesses established in France: the invoice itself travels through the platform in a structured format (Factur-X, UBL or CII), with statuses tracked in real time. E-reporting (e-reporting) covers the rest — sales to private individuals, intra-EU supplies, exports and certain services — where no electronic invoice circulates but the transaction data must still be transmitted to the administration through your platform. A foreign-owned SAS selling both to French professionals and to consumers or foreign clients must therefore handle both flows. Your accountant or platform should map, client by client and flow by flow, which invoices go through e-invoicing and which sales go through e-reporting, because a sale wrongly classified is a sale wrongly declared, with VAT and penalty consequences described below.

The legal backbone of invoicing has not changed, only its channel. Under the Commercial Code, invoicing between professionals remains compulsory: “Le vendeur est tenu de délivrer la facture dès la réalisation de la livraison ou de la prestation de services au sens du 3 du I de l’article 289 du code général des impôts” (article L441-9 of the Commercial Code). On the tax side, the VAT rule provides that “Tout assujetti est tenu de s’assurer qu’une facture est émise, par lui-même, ou en son nom et pour son compte, par son client ou par un tiers” (article 289 of the General Tax Code). Who pays the VAT remains governed by the basic rule that “La taxe sur la valeur ajoutée doit être acquittée par les personnes qui réalisent les opérations imposables” (article 283 of the General Tax Code), with reverse-charge exceptions where the French VAT-registered customer accounts for the tax on supplies from a supplier established outside France. The reform adds a layer — the platform, the format, the directory, the new mandatory details — but a missing invoice still means a missing right to deduct and, in the worst case, a fine for missing or fictitious invoicing, since the Tax Code punishes “le fait de ne pas délivrer une facture ou la note prévue à l’article 290 quinquies et de ne pas comptabiliser la transaction” (article 1737 of the General Tax Code). Keep every invoice and supporting document for ten years in euros and in French, as company records require: “Les documents comptables et les pièces justificatives sont conservés pendant dix ans.” (article L123-22 of the Commercial Code).

For the foreign owner, three practical consequences follow. First, check today that your company can actually receive: ask your accountant which PDP or PPF channel is designated, test the directory entry under your SIREN, and confirm who inside or outside the company monitors incoming invoices (accountant, local manager, or you through remote access). Second, diary the 1 September 2027 issuing deadline now, but consider moving earlier if your big customers demand platform-routed invoices — commercial pressure often bites before the legal deadline. Third, align your VAT position with the invoicing circuit: if your French company files French VAT returns (the CA3 periodic return and the VAT setup explained in our companion guide on VAT returns, CA3 deadlines and refunds for foreign-owned French companies), the data in the returns must match the data in the platform. Divergence between platform flows and filed returns is exactly what automated tax checks will flag first.

B. Which Platform, Which Format and Which New Invoice Details Your Company Must Use

Your company cannot simply choose any software: invoices must travel through an accredited platform (PDP) or the free public portal (PPF), directly or through a compatible solution connected to one of them. The list of accredited platforms is published and updated by the tax authority on impots.gouv.fr, and the administration invites every business to consult it and designate its platform for issuing, receiving or reporting. For a company run from abroad, the choice is operational, not just legal: who logs in, who validates, who corrects a rejected invoice, in which language, with which notification chain? A founder in another time zone who discovers a rejected invoice three weeks later pays late-payment interest in the meantime. Set up notifications to at least two people (you and your accountant or local contact), define who may issue a credit note (avoir) and who may accept a supplier invoice, and document these powers — a platform account shared informally with no written authority is a dispute waiting to happen.

The format matters because the platform validates structure, not just content. The three accepted structured formats are Factur-X (a PDF with embedded structured data, the gentlest path for small companies), UBL and CII (pure structured messages for integrated accounting systems). Your existing PDF template is not enough on its own: as noted above, a scanned paper invoice, an ordinary PDF or a document sent by email will no longer comply with the rules. Ask your software provider explicitly whether it produces one of the three compliant formats and whether it connects to your chosen PDP, or whether you will create invoices directly on the platform — the administration confirms that a business without software can create invoices directly on its accredited platform. Test the full loop before the deadline: issue, transmission, customer receipt status, correction by credit note, and e-reporting transmission for non-invoiced flows.

Four new mandatory details must appear on invoices from 1 September 2026, in addition to the classic list (names, addresses, dates, quantities, prices, VAT, payment date, penalty rate, recovery indemnity, order number). The most quoted is the customer’s SIREN number; the others concern the category of the transaction (sale of goods, supply of services, or both), the delivery address of the goods where different from the billing address, and information about payment of the VAT on account (acomptes) where relevant. For a foreign-owned company, the SIREN-of-customer rule has immediate bite: you must collect and verify every French professional customer’s SIREN before invoicing, and foreign customers without a SIREN fall under different reporting flows. Update your client onboarding form now — legal name, SIREN, billing and delivery addresses, VAT number, platform routing details — and clean the existing customer file, because the platform will reject or your customer will refuse invoices with missing details, and each rejection restarts the payment clock against you if you are the supplier.

Non-compliance is punished on two fronts. Commercially, breach of the invoicing rules exposes the company to an administrative fine: any breach of these invoicing duties exposes the business to an administrative fine of up to 75,000 euros for an individual and 375,000 euros for a legal entity, doubled for a repeated breach within two years (article L441-9 of the Commercial Code). Fiscally, missing, inaccurate or fictitious invoicing can trigger the 50% penalty of article 1737 of the General Tax Code and loss of the customer’s VAT deduction, which your customer will then claim back from you contractually. Added to this is the reform’s own penalty for breach of the electronic invoicing and e-reporting duties (a per-invoice fine with a cap, applied per offender and per year), which your accountant should quantify for your volumes. From abroad, you cannot plead distance: directors of a French SAS or SARL are liable for organising compliance, and the company’s money pays first. Budget the platform cost, the customer-file cleanup and a short training session for whoever issues invoices — it is a fraction of one fine.

A Paris and Ile-de-France note, since many foreign founders base their French company in the capital: no regional variation applies to the mandate itself — it is national — but Paris-area practice matters. Commercial courts and counterparties in Paris (Tribunal de commerce de Paris for disputes, Paris Centre des finances publiques for VAT) process high volumes of platform-era disputes, large Paris customers imposed platform routing earliest, and Paris accountants moved first to PDP partnerships. If your registered office (siège social) is domiciled in Paris while you live abroad, make sure your domiciliation agent forwards platform notifications and tax mail without delay, and that your Greffe (registry) and RNE details — legal name, address, directors — are current, because directory routing and invoice details draw on them. A company whose address changed without an RNE update invoices with a wrong address and gets rejected by careful customers.

II. How You Enforce Payment and Handle Invoice Disputes From Abroad

A. How Late-Payment Interest, the 40-Euro Indemnity and Invoice Proof Work in Your Favour

French law is unusually creditor-friendly on late payment between professionals, and the platform era makes proof easier because every invoice carries a timestamp and a status history. The Commercial Code sets the default payment period at thirty days after receipt of the goods or performance of the service, allows agreed terms up to sixty days from the invoice date, and tolerates forty-five days end-of-month only if expressly stipulated and not manifestly abusive (article L441-10 of the Commercial Code). Your general terms or the contract should therefore state the agreed period clearly; from abroad, align it with the platform reality — a customer who receives instantly through the platform cannot credibly claim it never saw the invoice. Keep the clause short, bilingual if needed, but with the French version prevailing, and mirror it on every invoice’s payment-details block.

When the due date passes, three rights arise automatically, without any reminder letter. First, late-payment penalties (pénalités de retard) run from the day after the due date at the rate stated in your terms or, failing that, at the European Central Bank refinancing rate plus ten points; the rate cannot be set below three times the legal interest rate. Under article L441-10, late penalties accrue automatically from the day after the due date with no reminder letter required. Second, every late-paying professional automatically owes a fixed recovery indemnity per late invoice, set by decree at 40 euros. These two sentences should be quoted in your reminder letters, because French debtors know them and foreign debtors learn quickly. Third, you may claim proven additional recovery costs above the 40 euros on justification.

Two court decisions show how judges apply these rules to real invoices, and both deserve the attention of a foreign owner who will never attend the hearing in person. In a 2015 ruling of the Commercial Chamber of the Cour de cassation (the supreme court for civil and commercial matters), case number 14-17.116, a supplier’s late-payment interest printed on the back of its invoices was upheld because the customer had never disputed that mention: the Court approved the appeal judges who found that “la cour d’appel a pu retenir que ces conditions de paiement étaient entrées dans le champ contractuel” (decision of 15 September 2015, Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, no. 14-17.116). The lesson is direct: print your penalty rate and recovery-indemnity clause on every invoice and in your terms, and an undisputed mention becomes part of the contract. Conversely, a missing mention leaves you arguing from scratch.

The second decision is a May 2026 ruling of the Paris Court of Appeal, RG 23/10014, which reads like a manual for platform-era invoice litigation. A supplier claimed late-payment interest and the 40-euro indemnities on three invoices paid late (with 137 days of accumulated delay), after an order-to-pay (injonction de payer) and an opposition that sent the case to the commercial court. The Court of Appeal held that the debtor owed the penalties at the rate shown on the supplier’s own invoices — three times the legal interest rate, the statutory minimum — because the supplier’s own mention derogated from the customer’s purchasing terms, and it added the now-famous line that the fixed indemnity was owed by any debtor in late payment under article L441-10 of the Commercial Code, even though the invoices had since been paid It therefore ordered 526.86 euros of interest plus 120 euros (three times 40 euros) of fixed indemnities, while rejecting the order-to-pay costs as court costs. Three lessons for a company run from abroad: claim interest even after the principal is paid, because the right survives payment; itemise per invoice with dates, since the court verified each invoice’s issue and payment dates; and do not inflate the order-to-pay costs into the claim, because judges reclassify them. The ruling is published under RG 23/10014 before the Paris Court of Appeal, Pole 4, Chamber 5, 20 May 2026, and its reasoning on article L441-10 is worth having your counsel cite in any reminder or petition.

Proof of the invoice itself is the other half of the battle, and here the platform helps but does not replace good habits. An accepted, unprotested invoice remains strong evidence of the obligation between merchants, especially when backed by the order, the delivery note (bon de livraison) or service acceptance, the contract, and consistent accounting entries. Keep the full chain for each disputed invoice: order, proof of delivery or performance, invoice with platform timestamps and statuses, reminders, and the customer’s responses or silence. Silence after receipt, combined with partial payment or a request for a payment plan, weighs heavily. From abroad, organise this file as you go — a shared folder per customer with everything dated — because the French judge decides on documents, and a complete file presented by your lawyer wins cases without your physical presence.

B. How You Recover an Unpaid Invoice From Abroad: Order to Pay, Opposition and Force Majeure Limits

The fastest recovery route for a contractual claim of a determined amount is the injonction de payer, the French order-to-pay procedure: a judge grants an enforceable payment order on your paper application, without a hearing, and the debtor is served and given one month to oppose (contester). The Code of Civil Procedure opens this route where “Le recouvrement d’une créance peut être demandé suivant la procédure d’injonction de payer lorsque : 1° La créance a une cause contractuelle ou résulte d’une obligation de caractère statutaire et s’élève à un montant déterminé” (article 1405 of the Code of Civil Procedure). File before the competent court — usually the commercial court (tribunal de commerce) of the debtor’s place for business debts, or the judicial court (tribunal judiciaire) depending on the parties — through French counsel with a power of attorney, the contract, the order, the delivery proofs, the platform-stamped invoices, the statement of account and the unsuccessful demand letter. No travel is needed: your lawyer represents the company throughout, and you sign and transfer documents electronically.

If the debtor does nothing within the month, you ask for enforceability (apposition de la formule exécutoire) and instruct a commissaire de justice (the enforcement officer, formerly huissier) to seize or obtain payment — bank attachment (saisie-attribution), attachment of receivables, or negotiated payment. If the debtor opposes, as happened in the Paris case above, the order-to-pay converts into an ordinary adversarial case before the competent court, and the procedure continues with exchanges of pleadings; opposition is not a defeat, it is the normal second round, and your documented file carries over. Diary two traps: first, limitation — five years for commercial claims in principle, so do not let a foreign customer’s silence age your file; second, the debtor’s insolvency — check the BODACC and the insolvency register before spending on enforcement, because an order against a company in liquidation (liquidation judiciaire) joins the queue of creditors instead of producing payment. A quick solvency check by your counsel before filing is money well spent.

Debtors resist with three classic defences, and the platform era weakens all of them when your file is complete. The first is it never received the invoice: platform timestamps, receipt statuses and e-reporting records answer it, backed by your email reminders. The second is the goods or services were defective or late, so it applied penalties or set off amounts owed: here the contract governs — “Les contrats légalement formés tiennent lieu de loi à ceux qui les ont faits.” (article 1103 of the Civil Code) — and a judge compares the penalty clause, the proven delay or defect, and your late-payment interest symmetrically, exactly as the Paris court did when it confirmed 31,818.16 euros of delivery-delay penalties against the supplier while awarding the supplier its own late-payment interest. The third is force majeure, and it fails more often than debtors hope. The Civil Code defines it strictly: “Il y a force majeure en matière contractuelle lorsqu’un événement échappant au contrôle du débiteur, qui ne pouvait être raisonnablement prévu lors de la conclusion du contrat et dont les effets ne peuvent être évités par des mesures appropriées, empêche l’exécution de son obligation par le débiteur.” (article 1218 of the Civil Code). In the Paris case, the supplier blamed the March 2021 Suez Canal blockage for late delivery, but the court dismissed the defence because a Wikipedia extract about the 2021 Suez Canal obstruction could not prove the impact of that event on the delivery delays at issue, adding that the supplier produced no evidence of the precise impact on its own business. A famous event is not proof: your opponent must prove the concrete causal link to its own failure, and general press cuttings do not suffice. When you are the creditor facing such a defence, ask for the missing proof in your pleadings; when you are the debtor invoking it, build the file event by event, document by document.

Organise the whole function so it runs without you being in France. Give your French lawyer a standing file: company Kbis, articles, delegation of powers to the person who signs demands, template demand letter citing articles L441-9 and L441-10, and the platform access needed to export invoice histories. Give your accountant a monthly closing checklist: all issued invoices transmitted, all received invoices accepted or disputed within days, e-reporting sent, VAT return reconciled with platform data, doubtful receivables flagged before they age. And set escalation thresholds in writing: reminder at due date plus seven days, formal demand (mise en demeure) with interest calculation at plus thirty days, order-to-pay petition above a defined amount or age. A foreign owner who runs this calendar from abroad, with counsel and accountant each knowing their cue, recovers faster and cheaper than an owner who discovers the unpaid pile at year-end.

Conclusion

Your French company must receive electronic invoices through the mandated circuit since 1 September 2026, whatever its size, and must issue electronically from 1 September 2026 if it is large or intermediate-sized and from 1 September 2027 if it is a small or micro-business — which covers most foreign-owned SAS and SARL structures. Designate the PDP or PPF channel now, clean the customer file with SIREN numbers and addresses, add the four new mandatory details to the template, test the Factur-X, UBL or CII loop, and reconcile platform data with VAT returns every month. The sanction for neglecting the circuit is not theoretical: fines up to 375,000 euros for a legal entity on the commercial side, loss of VAT deduction and heavy tax penalties on the fiscal side, and interest running against you as a late payer. Symmetrically, the same law arms you as a creditor: penalties without reminder, 40 euros per late invoice even after payment, contract clauses that bind an undisputed debtor, and the order-to-pay procedure that a French lawyer runs for you from filing to enforcement. Run the calendar from abroad with two partners — a platform connected to a responsive accountant, and counsel holding a standing enforcement file — and the reform becomes what it promises: faster invoices, fewer disputes, and unpaid bills recovered without boarding a plane. For related VAT mechanics, keep alongside this guide our analysis of VAT returns, CA3 deadlines and refunds for foreign-owned French companies.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
2 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
6 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
3 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago