Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Run Your French Company From Abroad: Director Pay, Social Charges, URSSAF Bills and Health Cover

You formed your French company from abroad, the Kbis arrived in your inbox, and now one practical question decides how much money leaves your account every quarter: how do you, the foreign director, get paid, and what does French social security charge you for it? The Kbis is the official certificate issued by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court, proving your company exists. From the day your appointment is registered, two French institutions look at you closely. The first is the tax office. The second is URSSAF, the union for collecting social security and family allowance contributions, the body that bills and recovers social charges on pay and on self-employed earnings. If you live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore and you chair a French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or manage a French SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company with stricter statutory rules), this article tells you which social status applies to you, what you owe when you pay yourself and when you take nothing, how an URSSAF reassessment works, and how you challenge it without boarding a plane to Paris.

French company law gives you wide powers. Your social security status, however, depends on the exact corporate office you hold, and the Cour de cassation, the supreme court for civil and criminal matters, draws a sharp line between a president treated like an employee for social security purposes and a manager treated as self-employed. That line decides the rate, the base and the collector of your contributions, your health cover, and your pension rights. Foreign founders often discover the bill late, when URSSAF sends a formal notice to a French address they rarely check, followed by an enforceable order called a contrainte. Every step of that chain has strict formal conditions, and the supreme court annuls recoveries when URSSAF skips them. This guide walks through the classification first, then the billing and the remedies, with the exact statutory texts and recent supreme court rulings you can rely on.

I. Your corporate office decides your French social security status

A. You chair a French SAS from abroad: pay, assimilated-employee status and general-scheme affiliation

The SAS is the vehicle most foreign founders select because the statute book leaves almost everything to the articles of association. The law states: “La société est représentée à l’égard des tiers par un président désigné dans les conditions prévues par les statuts.” In plain English, the company is represented vis-à-vis third parties by a president appointed under the conditions set by the articles, as Article L. 227-6 of the Commercial Code provides. The same article adds that the president holds the broadest powers to act in all circumstances in the name of the company within the limit of the corporate purpose, and that limits written into the articles cannot be invoked against third parties. A foreign resident can hold that office. Nothing in the text requires the president to live in France, and many SAS chaired from abroad operate lawfully with a president who visits only a few days per year. Your tax residence and your immigration status are separate questions handled by other desks; for social security, what matters is the office and the pay attached to it.

Social security law then pulls the SAS president into the general scheme by assimilation. Article L. 311-3 of the Social Security Code lists the persons covered by the compulsory affiliation obligation, and its item 23 covers “Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et des sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées”, meaning the presidents and directors of simplified joint-stock companies. The Cour de cassation applies that text literally. In a ruling of 5 June 2025, pourvoi No. V 23-13.887, the Second Civil Chamber recalled: “Selon l’article L. 311-3, 23°, du code de la sécurité sociale, dans sa rédaction applicable au litige, sont obligatoirement affiliés aux assurances sociales du régime général les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et de sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées.” The full decision is published at Cour de cassation, 2nd civil chamber, 5 June 2025, No. 23-13.887. The holding matters for founders who sit on a supervisory board or chair one: the Court added that members of a supervisory board, whose only mission is to control the management bodies without managing the company, are in principle not affiliated to the general scheme, “sauf à démontrer qu’ils exercent en réalité une fonction de direction”, unless it is shown that they actually perform a direction function. In that case the appeal court had noted that the supervisory board chairman was listed in BODACC, the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements where company events are published, as a person with standing power to bind the company, and that the M2 amendment form, the administrative form used to declare changes to a registered company, designated him as a director. Those findings allowed the court to conclude he genuinely directed the company, so the reassessment stood.

The practical consequence is straightforward. When your SAS pays you a salary or management fees for your office as president, those sums fall into the contribution base of the general scheme. Article L. 242-1 of the Social Security Code states: “Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues au titre de l’affiliation au régime général des personnes mentionnées aux articles L. 311-2 et L. 311-3 sont assises sur les revenus d’activité tels qu’ils sont pris en compte pour la détermination de l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-1-1 .” Contributions are therefore assessed on your activity income as defined for the CSG base, and they are owed for the periods to which that income relates. Your company withholds the employee share, pays the employer share, and reports both each month through the DSN, the nominative social declaration, the monthly electronic payroll return every French employer files. Whether you live abroad changes nothing about the employer’s reporting duty: the SAS remains a French employer and files the DSN for its president exactly like for any employee.

Assimilation is not employment, and the distinction costs real money. The Cour de cassation decided on 15 May 2025, pourvoi No. K 23-13.763, published at Cour de cassation, 2nd civil chamber, 15 May 2025, No. 23-13.763, that a SAS president affiliated by assimilation cannot claim the collectively agreed retirement departure indemnity reserved for executive employees. The Court noted that “il résultait de ses constatations que ce dirigeant était assujetti par assimilation au régime général en sa qualité de président d’une société par actions simplifiée”, so he could not claim, on that basis, the conventional indemnity for departure on retirement. The visa cites Articles L. 242-1, L. 311-2 and L. 311-3, 23° of the Social Security Code together with Article L. 1221-1 of the Labour Code. For a foreign founder, the lesson is concrete: you pay contributions like an employee, you accumulate general-scheme rights on the sums actually paid, but you cannot cumulate an employment contract on top of your office unless you perform technical functions distinct from the mandate, under subordination, for separate pay. Without that genuine dual status, no collective agreement benefit, no employee severance regime, and no shortcut to French employment protection. If you want both offices, document the separate technical role, the separate chain of command and the separate remuneration before any dispute arises.

Taking no pay as SAS president is lawful and common in the first year, when founders leave cash in the company. With no pay, no general-scheme contributions are due on your office, because the base under Article L. 242-1 is the activity income actually attributed. But zero pay does not mean zero paperwork. The articles should state whether the office is remunerated or unpaid, the shareholders should record the decision, and the company should still be able to show URSSAF, on request, that nothing was paid neither as salary nor as disguised benefit. Inspectors look for current-account advances, personal expenses run through the company, and dividends reclassified as pay. Dividends voted by the shareholders are taxed as capital income, not as salary, but an inspector who finds monthly fixed transfers labelled as advances may reassess them as remuneration. Keep the three streams visibly separate: documented salary with payslips and DSN entries, dividends voted in minutes with a distributable profit, and a shareholder current account whose movements are traceable and repayable.

Health cover follows the same logic. A paid SAS president affiliated to the general scheme opens French health, maternity and basic pension rights proportionate to contributions, even while living abroad, subject to the coordination rules that apply between France and the country of residence. An unpaid president residing abroad generally keeps no French health cover from the office alone and relies on the system of the country of residence or on private cover. Do not confuse the office with residence: chairing a French SAS does not grant French residence, does not create a French tax household by itself, and does not replace the visa or permit analysis that belongs to immigration law. For the social security question alone, the rule of thumb holds: paid president means general-scheme affiliation on the pay; unpaid president means no contributions and no new rights from the office.

B. You manage a French SARL from abroad: self-employed status, separate contributions and minimum bills

The SARL plays by different rules. Article L. 223-18 of the Commercial Code opens with the sentence: “La société à responsabilité limitée est gérée par une ou plusieurs personnes physiques.” Only natural persons can manage a SARL, they may be chosen from outside the shareholders, and they are appointed by the shareholders in the articles or by a later decision. Like the SAS president, the SARL manager holds the broadest powers to act in the name of the company vis-à-vis third parties, and the company is bound even by acts beyond the corporate purpose unless it proves the third party knew of the excess. A foreign resident can serve as gérant, the French word for the manager of a SARL, without living in France. The appointment is filed with the RNE, the national register of companies kept through the single-window portal called the guichet unique, and published so that banks and contracting parties can check who signs for the company.

The social security treatment then diverges sharply from the SAS. A majority manager of a SARL, meaning a gérant who holds more than half of the shares alone or with family members, belongs to the self-employed scheme, not the general scheme. The majority manager pays contributions as a travailleur non salarié, abbreviated TNS, the self-employed worker status, assessed on professional income. Article L. 131-6 of the Social Security Code provides: “Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues par les travailleurs indépendants non agricoles ne relevant pas du dispositif prévu à l’article L. 613-7 sont assises sur l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-3.” The base is therefore the professional income defined for self-employed contributions, after deduction of the employee savings sums paid to the manager listed in the Labour Code articles cited by the text. In practice the TNS manager pays health, basic pension, supplementary pension, invalidity-death and family allowance contributions calculated on the SARL earnings attributed to the manager, plus the CSG and CRDS levies, through the self-employed collection channel now operated within URSSAF. The rates and the base differ from the general scheme, and the cover differs too: daily sickness allowances start later, pension accrual follows the self-employed points system, and complementary cover must often be topped up privately.

Two traps catch foreign managers. The first is the minimum contribution bill. Even with modest or zero profit, the self-employed scheme calls flat minimum contributions for health, pension and invalidity once the affiliation exists. A founder who keeps a loss-making SARL alive from abroad while taking nothing still receives calls for minimum contributions, and those calls grow with late-payment surcharges. The second trap is the status boundary inside the SARL itself. A minority or equal manager who also holds a genuine employment contract for separate technical duties can belong to the general scheme for the salary, while a majority manager cannot cumulate that protection. If you designed a 50-50 SARL with a friend in Paris and you manage from abroad, your exact shareholding fraction decides the scheme: cross the half line and you fall into the TNS regime with its minimums; stay at or below half with a real employment contract and the salary follows the general scheme. Founders who adjust shareholdings casually between funding rounds sometimes cross that line without realising it, then contest the TNS bills a year later from abroad. Check the fraction before each capital change and record the manager’s status in the minutes.

Pay design for the SARL manager therefore starts with a comparison the founder must run in numbers, not impressions. Salary within the general scheme costs employer and employee contributions at high combined rates but buys the general-scheme cover and counts for unemployment insurance only with a genuine employment contract, which a majority manager cannot hold. Manager’s drawings taxed as self-employed earnings cost a different bundle of contributions with minimums but keep the accounting simple. Dividends voted on distributable profits are taxed as capital income and, for the majority manager, the fraction exceeding ten percent of the share capital can attract social charges under rules the tax desk handles. Many foreign founders combine a modest manager’s remuneration with annual dividends once profits stabilise, and they revisit the mix each year when the accounts are approved. Whatever mix you choose, vote the remuneration in a shareholders’ decision, pay it through the company accounts with the matching declarations, and keep dividends inside a separate voted resolution backed by accounts showing distributable sums. An inspector treats undocumented monthly drawings as the first sign of concealed pay.

Statutory latitude also differs between the two vehicles when the relationship breaks. In a SAS, the silence of the statute book is filled by the articles: the Cour de cassation held on 9 March 2022, pourvoi No. F 19-25.795, published at Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 9 March 2022, No. 19-25.795, that “les conditions dans lesquelles les dirigeants d’une société par actions simplifiée peuvent être révoqués de leurs fonctions sont, dans le silence de la loi, librement fixées par les statuts, qu’il s’agisse des causes de la révocation ou de ses modalités”. Revocation can therefore take effect without proof of a just ground when the articles say so, as in that case where Article 18 of the Hubbard company articles allowed revocation at any time by the sole shareholder or the ordinary meeting on the president’s proposal. Foreign founders should use that latitude deliberately: write into the SAS articles who removes the president, on what notice, with what severance, and what happens to pay and benefits on departure. In a SARL the statute book constrains removal more tightly and damages for abusive revocation are a classic litigation topic on the French-language company desk. Your choice of vehicle thus shapes both the contribution bill and the exit cost, and both should be modelled before registration rather than renegotiated in a crisis.

II. URSSAF bills you and you answer from abroad

A. URSSAF audits your French company while you live abroad: notice, payslips, contribution base and surcharges

URSSAF audits follow a written procedure with mandatory steps, and each step creates a document you must keep. It starts with an avis de contrôle, the audit notice announcing the inspector’s visit. Article R. 243-59 of the Social Security Code states: “Tout contrôle effectué en application de l’article L. 243-7 est précédé, au moins trente jours avant la date de la première visite de l’agent chargé du contrôle, de l’envoi par l’organisme effectuant le contrôle des cotisations et contributions de sécurité sociale d’un avis de contrôle.” Thirty days minimum between the notice and the first visit is therefore your preparation window: gather articles, shareholder minutes, employment contracts, payslips, DSN receipts, the manager’s status records and the dividend resolutions. The inspector then examines the books, interviews whoever is present, and sends a lettre d’observations, the observations letter listing each planned reassessment by head of adjustment with the law and the facts supporting it and the calculation method. You have thirty days to reply, extendable to sixty on request, and the inspector must answer each of your detailed observations with reasons. Only after that adversarial exchange can URSSAF send the mise en demeure, the formal demand to pay, and then the contrainte, the enforceable order served like a court order that you can oppose before the social court.

For a company directed from abroad, three audit themes return constantly. The first is the contribution base on the director’s pay: salary, bonuses, benefits in kind, and any advantage the inspector reclassifies as pay. The inspector cross-checks payslips against DSN filings, bank transfers and the general ledger, and any gap becomes a head of reassessment. The second is the boundary between pay and dividends: fixed monthly transfers without payslips, personal travel or housing run through the company, shareholder current-account drawings that never return. The third is undeclared work and missing reductions: a founder who has a developer working full time from the Paris flat without a DPAE, the prior hiring declaration, or who claims contribution reductions while employing staff off the books. Article L. 133-4-2 of the Social Security Code warns: “Le bénéfice de toute mesure de réduction ou d’exonération, totale ou partielle, de cotisations de sécurité sociale, de contributions dues aux organismes de sécurité sociale ou de cotisations ou contributions mentionnées au I de l’article L. 241-13 est supprimé en cas de constat des infractions mentionnées aux 1° à 4° de l’article L. 8211-1 du code du travail.” Concealed work therefore costs the reductions as well as the reassessment, plus the surcharges for abuse defined in the following articles of the code.

Distance raises the stakes because paper moves slowly and deadlines do not wait. The mise en demeure and the contrainte are served at the company’s registered office, the siège social, and opposition periods run from service, not from the day you open the letter during a Paris trip. Give your French accountant or your lawyer a standing mandate to receive and forward URSSAF mail, keep the siège social address monitored, and calendar every deadline the day each letter arrives. Late-payment surcharges accrue from the due date, and the complementary surcharge for failure to file or pay on time compounds the damage. When the inspector proposes figures you dispute, answer inside the thirty-day window with documents, not adjectives: corrected DSN receipts, the employment contract proving subordination for the cumulated role, the shareholder minutes voting the dividend, the lease proving the housing is the company’s establishment and not your residence. Inspectors drop heads of reassessment when the paper trail closes the gap; they maintain them when the reply argues in general terms.

Two companion guides on this site complete the picture for founders who want the full chain. The hub guide explains the formation sequence from the capital deposit to the Kbis and the first VAT and payroll steps at Setting Up a Company in France as a Foreign Founder: Bank Account, Kbis, VAT and Your First Hire. The companion piece on being wrongly treated as a director while living abroad covers the mirror situation, where URSSAF pursues you personally for company debts, at Chased Abroad for Your French Company’s Debts? How a Foreign Director Fights the Claim Without Flying to Paris. Read them together: the hub for building, this article for paying yourself, the companion for defending your personal assets.

B. You challenge the URSSAF bill without flying to Paris: formal notice, opposition and court deadlines

The recovery chain has a weak link that the Cour de cassation polices strictly: the mise en demeure must be regular, and a void demand kills the enforcement built on it. Article L. 244-2 of the Social Security Code sets the rule: “Si la poursuite n’a pas lieu à la requête du ministère public, ledit avertissement est remplacé par une mise en demeure adressée par lettre recommandée ou par tout moyen donnant date certaine à sa réception par l’employeur ou le travailleur indépendant.” The demand must be precise and reasoned, sent by registered letter or any means giving a certain date of receipt, and its content follows conditions fixed by decree. On 17 October 2024, pourvoi No. G 21-25.851, published at Cour de cassation, 2nd civil chamber, 17 October 2024, No. 21-25.851, the Second Civil Chamber drew the full consequence: “Il résulte de ces textes que la notification d’une mise en demeure régulière constitue un préalable obligatoire aux poursuites et que la nullité de la mise en demeure fait obstacle à ce que, dans la même instance, l’organisme de recouvrement poursuive le paiement des sommes qui en font l’objet.” The appeal court had annulled the demand of 27 December 2016 and the subsequent order of 3 February 2017, yet validated the reassessment on URSSAF’s counterclaim for the same sums; the supreme court quashed that outcome and held that the nullity of the demand blocks the collector from pursuing payment of those sums in the same proceedings. For a founder served abroad, the checklist is therefore mechanical: pull the demand, check the sender, the registered form, the exact sums per period, the legal basis per head of adjustment, and the one-month invitation to regularise. A demand that lumps years together without per-period figures, cites no text, or was never served at the siège social is vulnerable, and that vulnerability must be raised before the social court early, not as an afterthought on appeal.

The procedural path from abroad runs in four documented stages. First, the adversarial reply to the observations letter within thirty days, extendable to sixty, with exhibits numbered and referenced head by head. Second, the recours gracieux before the collector’s amiable appeals commission, the commission de recours amiable, the mandatory first step for most contribution disputes, filed within the stated deadline with a copy of the demand and your evidence. Third, opposition to the contrainte before the pôle social of the judicial court, the specialised social division of the local court, within fifteen days of service of the order; the opposition must state the grounds and attach the challenged order, and representation by a lawyer admitted in France keeps the file admissible while you stay abroad. Fourth, appeal to the cour d’appel and, on points of law, pourvoi to the Cour de cassation. At every stage the court checks standing, deadlines and the regularity of service before the merits, so a file that proves the company received the order late, or that the signatory lacked authority, can win without debating a single euro of base. Keep every envelope, every acknowledgement of receipt, and every DSN filing receipt: French social courts decide on exhibits, and the founder who produces a complete bundle from abroad beats the founder who explains from memory.

Prescription and surcharges deserve their own calendar line. Contribution claims are subject to a three-year limitation running from the end of the year in which payment was due, extended when criminal concealment is established, and each regularising act, a compliant demand, a granted payment schedule, a partial payment, restarts analysis anew. Late-payment surcharges start at five percent plus a monthly complementary increase, and the surcharge for undeclared work reaches twenty-five percent in the standard case. A founder who discovers an old unpaid call should therefore neither ignore it nor pay blindly: ignoring lets surcharges compound and the contrainte arrive; paying blindly may waive a limitation or regularity defence worth more than the principal. The correct sequence is to stabilise the position by filing the pending declarations, request a payment schedule to stop enforcement while negotiating, and challenge the heads of adjustment that lack a legal base, all within the opposition periods. Payment schedules are granted on written request with cash-flow evidence, and collectors routinely accept monthly instalments from companies that file on time and pay the current charges while clearing the arrears.

For founders who live outside the European Union, two extra layers apply. First, international recovery assistance means a French social debt can follow you through cooperation instruments, and a French enforceable order can be recognised abroad under bilateral or European mechanisms depending on the country. Leaving France does not erase the debt, and dissolving the company does not automatically erase the director’s personal exposure where the law attaches it. Second, double-affiliation risk: a founder who works simultaneously in France and in another state may face competing social security claims, resolved by the coordination regulations within Europe and by bilateral conventions beyond it. If you already pay self-employed contributions in your country of residence, gather the affiliation certificates and the convention text before URSSAF classifies you, because the classification made in the first audit tends to stick for later years. Raise the applicable convention and the posted-worker or multi-state-activity rules at the observations-letter stage, when the inspector can still correct the file, rather than for the first time before the judge.

Conclusion

Directing your French company from abroad is lawful, common and workable, but the social security status never follows the passport: it follows the office. Chair a SAS and take pay, and you belong to the general scheme by assimilation on the sums attributed, with the rights and the limits the Cour de cassation drew in its rulings of 5 June 2025 and 15 May 2025. Manage a majority-held SARL and you belong to the self-employed scheme, with its own base under Article L. 131-6 and its minimum calls even in lean years. Take nothing and you owe nothing on the office, provided the articles say so and the three money streams, salary, dividends and current account, stay visibly separate in the books. When URSSAF audits, the thirty-day notice, the reasoned observations letter, the precise formal demand and the enforceable order form a chain where each link must hold; the ruling of 17 October 2024 shows that a void demand blocks the recovery in the same proceedings. Calendar every deadline at the siège social, answer each head of adjustment with exhibits, use the amiable commission and the opposition to the order within their short periods, and keep the hub formation guide and the personal-assets companion guide alongside this article in your file. The founder who classifies the office correctly on day one, votes the pay properly each year, and challenges a flawed demand on time pays the right amount and nothing more.

Need a quick opinion on your case.

You run a French company from abroad and you need to know what your office really costs you. Our office offers a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm: first telephone analysis for 80 EUR including VAT (TTC). Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write through our contact page with your Kbis, your articles, your latest URSSAF letters and your last twelve payslips or dividend minutes. We check your SAS or SARL status, recalculate the contribution base, verify the regularity of any formal demand or enforceable order, and file the reply, the amiable appeal or the opposition within the deadline.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
1 week ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.