Your French company has closed a profitable year, the cash sits in a Paris bank account, and you live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. Getting that profit home looks simple: vote a dividend, wire the money, declare it at home. In France, each of those three steps has a trap. The dividend must be voted by the right meeting, out of the right profit, in the right year, or the resolution can be annulled. The French company must withhold tax at the source before paying you, at a rate that depends on who you are, where you live and which tax treaty applies, and the wrong rate costs real money. Then your home country may tax the dividend again, unless a treaty or an exemption spares you. This guide walks through the whole chain in order: how to distribute lawfully from abroad, how much France keeps at the source, and how to bring the net amount home with the paperwork your bank and both tax offices will demand.
The stakes are not theoretical. On 15 September 2026 the Paris Court of Appeal (Pôle 5, Chambre 8, RG 24/06926) ordered an accounting firm to pay 50,040 euros to a French national living in Spain because, year after year from 2012 to 2017, it had applied a 21 percent withholding rate to his dividends instead of the 15 percent rate granted by the France-Spain tax treaty. A few words about the vocabulary used below. The Kbis is the official identity certificate of a French company, issued by the greffe, which is the registry of the commercial court. The BODACC (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales) is the official gazette where company events are published. The SIE (service des impôts des entreprises) is the corporate tax office that collects company tax. The CGI (code général des impôts) is the French tax code, IS (impôt sur les sociétés) is corporate income tax, and an AGM (assemblée générale) is the shareholders meeting. SAS (société par actions simplifiée) and SARL (société à responsabilité limitée) are the two company forms foreign founders use most. Keep these initials in mind; every step below refers to them.
I. Vote the dividend in France without getting the resolution cancelled
A. Only distributable profit can be distributed, and only the meeting that approves the accounts can vote it
French company law does not let shareholders distribute whatever the bank balance shows. Article L. 232-11 of the Commercial Code defines the boundary: “Le bénéfice distribuable est constitué par le bénéfice de l’exercice, diminué des pertes antérieures, ainsi que des sommes à porter en réserve en application de la loi ou des statuts, et augmenté du report bénéficiaire.” Only the profit of the financial year, minus prior losses and the sums that must go to reserves, plus retained earnings carried forward (report bénéficiaire), counts as distributable (Article L. 232-11, Commercial Code, Légifrance). Losses from earlier years must be absorbed first, the legal reserve must be fed until it reaches one tenth of the share capital, and any reserve the articles of association (statuts) require comes next. What remains can be paid out, kept in reserves the meeting controls, or carried forward again.
The second rule is about who decides and when. Article L. 232-12 of the Commercial Code provides: “Après approbation des comptes annuels et constatation de l’existence de sommes distribuables, l’assemblée générale détermine la part attribuée aux associés sous forme de dividendes.” The meeting must first approve the annual accounts, record that distributable sums exist, and only then set the dividend (Article L. 232-12, Commercial Code, Légifrance). In practice this means the ordinary annual meeting that signs off the accounts is the meeting that votes the dividend for that year. A foreign owner who asks the manager to wire out last year’s profit before the accounts are approved is asking for an unlawful distribution, and a manager who complies exposes the company and himself.
The Cour de cassation drew the consequences with unusual strictness in a recent ruling that every foreign shareholder should know. On 12 February 2025 the Commercial Chamber (pourvoi C 23-11.410, arrêt 72 FS-B) recalled first that “les délibérations d’une société commerciale s’imposent aux associés tant que la nullité n’en a pas été prononcée.” A company resolution stands and binds everyone until a court annuls it; nobody, not even a unanimous group of shareholders, can simply treat a distribution vote as if it never happened (Cass. com., 12 February 2025, 23-11.410, courdecassation.fr). The same decision then explains the timing rule for retained earnings: “le report bénéficiaire d’un exercice est inclus dans le bénéfice distribuable de l’exercice suivant et que, par voie de conséquence, seule l’assemblée approuvant les comptes de cet exercice pourra décider son affectation et, le cas échéant, sa distribution.” Retained earnings carried forward merge into the next year’s distributable profit, so only the meeting that approves that next year’s accounts can allocate them (Cass. com., 12 February 2025, 23-11.410, courdecassation.fr). The penalty follows immediately: “encourt la nullité la délibération d’une assemblée générale autre que celle approuvant les comptes de l’exercice et décidant la distribution d’un dividende prélevé sur le report à nouveau bénéficiaire d’un exercice précédent.” A meeting that is not the accounts-approving meeting, and that votes a dividend taken from an earlier year’s retained earnings, adopts a resolution that incurs nullity (Cass. com., 12 February 2025, 23-11.410, courdecassation.fr).
In that case, the facts were textbook. The 30 April 2017 meeting had approved the 2016 accounts and allocated the profit to retained earnings; a later meeting on 3 July 2017 voted a 60,000 euro dividend taken from those retained earnings; the shares were sold in between, and the sellers sued for payment. The Court of Appeal had refused payment, and the Cour de cassation approved, because the July meeting had no power to distribute what the April meeting had carried forward. For a foreign founder, the lesson is concrete. If your 2024 profit was carried forward instead of distributed, you cannot simply convene a quick meeting in 2026 and vote it out. The distribution must wait for, and be voted by, the meeting that approves the accounts of the year in which the retained earnings now sit. Plan the calendar with your accountant: approve, allocate, distribute, in that order, at the right meeting. Interim dividends (acomptes sur dividendes) exist, but they require a mid-year balance sheet certified by the statutory auditor and follow their own conditions, so treat them as an exception to organise in advance, not as a shortcut around the annual meeting.
Running this from abroad is an organisation question, not a legal impossibility. Give your French accountant and your manager written instructions before the year-end: which profit to distribute, which to carry forward, and the date of the accounts meeting. If you cannot fly to Paris, vote by proxy (pouvoir) or by the remote means your statuts allow, and make sure the proxy reaches the chairman before the meeting. Keep the signed minutes (procès-verbal), the approved accounts and the attendance sheet in the company records; your bank will ask for the minutes before wiring a large dividend abroad, and the SIE will ask for them if it ever reviews the distribution. A clean paper trail at the voting stage is what makes every later step, withholding, transfer and home-country declaration, defensible.
B. File the distribution, pay the withholding to the Treasury, and prepare the transfer file your bank demands
Once the dividend is voted, the French company becomes the tax collector. The Paris Court of Appeal put it plainly in the September 2026 decision: “L’article 119 bis 2 du code général des impôts prévoit une retenue à la source au niveau de la société sur les revenus des capitaux mobiliers distribués à des non-résidents.” Withholding at source (retenue à la source) applies at the level of the company on investment income paid to non-residents (CA Paris, Pôle 5, Chambre 8, 15 September 2026, RG 24/06926, courdecassation.fr). The court continues: “L’impôt dû étant retranché par la société avant la distribution des dividendes, l’associé non-résident fiscalement en France perçoit en conséquence des dividendes nets d’impôt.” The tax is taken off before the dividend reaches you, so what lands in your foreign account is already net of French tax (CA Paris, 15 September 2026, RG 24/06926, courdecassation.fr). And the court allocates the duty precisely: “il appartient à la société distributrice d’appliquer le taux de prélèvement conforme à la situation considérée, en sélectionnant le taux applicable, en tenant compte le cas échéant de l’existence d’une convention fiscale internationale.” The distributing company must select the correct rate for the situation, taking any applicable tax treaty into account (CA Paris, 15 September 2026, RG 24/06926, courdecassation.fr). If you are the sole shareholder living abroad and your French accountant files the return, verify the rate line yourself; the company is legally identified as the debtor of the withholding, and errors surface years later with interest.
The filing itself runs through a dedicated return. The Paris decision records that the mission of the accounting firm included completing return number 2777 for investment income withholding (revenus de capitaux mobiliers, prélèvement et retenue à la source), and that the form offers several possible rates for the same taxable base. Your accountant files this return and pays the Treasury by the deadline following the distribution month. From abroad, confirm three things in writing: that the 2777 was filed, which rate box was ticked, and that the payment proof (avis de paiement) is in the file. If a reduced treaty rate is claimed, the residence certificate of the shareholder (attestation de résidence fiscale) or equivalent proof should be gathered before the payment date, because the rate must be right on the day the dividend is put into payment, not reconstructed afterwards. The 2026 Paris case turned exactly on this point: the correct 15 percent treaty rate had been known since 2010, yet the firm kept applying 21 percent for six years, arguing that the shareholder had never supplied the Spanish tax residence certificate. The court held the firm liable anyway for never formally demanding the right documents and never warning the client, but the shareholder still waited years and went through two courts to recover his 50,040 euros. Prevention, a certificate collected before distribution, beats cure.
Then comes the wire. French banks apply anti-money-laundering checks to large transfers to foreign accounts, especially first-time dividend wires to a new jurisdiction. Prepare a transfer file before instructing the payment: the signed AGM minutes voting the dividend, the approved accounts showing the distributable profit, the Kbis of less than three months proving the company is active and who represents it, the paid 2777 return, and your residence certificate. If the bank asks for the Statuts or the register of shareholders, that is routine, not hostility. Founders based in Paris and Île-de-France can usually deliver these documents at the counter of the branch holding the company account; from abroad, send certified scans through your relationship manager and keep originals with your French counsel. One practical warning: never mix the dividend wire with a current-account (compte courant d’associé) repayment in the same transfer without labelling each part. The tax treatment differs, and an unlabelled lump sum invites the SIE to reclassify the whole amount. For the general company calendar that frames all these steps, from approving accounts to filing returns, our companion guide on running a French company from abroad remains the reference inside this site (annual legal calendar of a French company run from abroad).
II. Pay the right French withholding and bring the cash home
A. The default French levy on dividends paid abroad, and how tax treaties cut it
French domestic law starts from a simple principle. Article 119 bis, paragraph 2, of the CGI provides: “Les produits visés aux articles 108 à 117 bis donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source dont le taux est fixé par l’article 187 lorsque leurs bénéficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur siège en France”. Dividends and similar distributions paid to beneficial owners who are not French tax residents suffer withholding at the rate set by Article 187 (Article 119 bis, CGI, Légifrance). Note the words bénéficiaire effectif, beneficial owner: the rate follows the real recipient of the income at the end of any chain of intermediaries, not the paying agent in the middle. A dividend routed through a foreign holding or a paying bank is still tested on the person who ultimately receives it.
Article 187 then sets the numbers. For individual shareholders, the rule is short: “12,8 % pour les bénéficiaires personnes physiques.” A non-resident individual suffers 12.8 percent at source under current domestic law (Article 187, CGI, Légifrance). For comparison, French-resident individuals face a formally similar but legally distinct levy, since Article 117 quater of the CGI provides that resident individuals receiving such distributions “sont assujetties à un prélèvement au taux de 12,8 %” Residents pay a 12.8 percent advance (prélèvement forfaitaire non libératoire) credited against their final income tax, while non-residents suffer a final withholding, and the two must not be confused in the 2777 return (Article 117 quater, CGI, Légifrance). For corporate shareholders, Article 187 refers onward: the rate is “Celui prévu au deuxième alinéa du I de l’article 219 pour tous les autres revenus.” Companies suffer the corporate-rate withholding (Article 187, CGI, Légifrance), and Article 219, paragraph I, fixes the reference: “Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %.” The standard corporate rate is 25 percent (Article 219, CGI, Légifrance). So a dividend paid to a foreign parent company suffers 25 percent at source by default, and a dividend paid to a foreign individual suffers 12.8 percent, before treaties enter the picture. Payments routed to a non-cooperative state or territory (ETNC, État ou territoire non coopératif) face a punitive rate: the tax administration confirms that a 75 percent levy applies when the income is paid into a non-cooperative state, a charge that no treaty softens (BOI-RPPM-RCM-30-30-10-20, BOFiP-Impôts). Check where the receiving account sits before distributing; a holding parked in a blacklisted jurisdiction turns a routine dividend into a confiscation.
Treaties then cut these domestic rates, and the Paris 2026 case shows exactly how. The shareholder had lived in the United Kingdom in 2010 and 2011, then in Spain from 2012, while his French SARL distributed dividends every year. France had levied 25 percent, then 21 percent. The France-Spain treaty of 10 October 1995, Article 10, states for dividends paid by a French company to a Spanish resident: “mais si la personne qui reçoit les dividendes en est le bénéficiaire effectif, l’impôt ainsi établi ne peut excéder 15% du montant brut des dividendes.” Where the recipient is the beneficial owner, French tax cannot exceed 15 percent of the gross dividend, as the Paris court recalled (CA Paris, 15 September 2026, RG 24/06926, courdecassation.fr). Six years of 21 percent instead of 15 percent on 849,006 euros of gross dividends produced the 50,040 euro shortfall the court awarded, with the blunt finding: “La société Arfeuille et Associés a ainsi manqué à son obligation d’information et de conseil à l’égard de sa cliente pour la période 2012-2017 ce qui l’a conduit à pratiquer une retenue à la source correspondant à un taux d’imposition erroné de 21% au lieu de 15%.” The firm had breached its duty of information and advice, applying 21 percent instead of 15 percent for six years (CA Paris, 15 September 2026, RG 24/06926, courdecassation.fr).
For a foreign founder today, the operating method follows from that judgment. First, identify your treaty before the distribution: France has treaties with most countries, typically capping dividend withholding at 15 percent for individuals and often 5 percent for corporate parents with substantial holdings, while some treaties go lower or, rarely, higher. Second, prove residence before payment. The administration allows treaty benefits either upfront through the simplified procedure before the dividend is put into payment, or afterwards through the normal refund procedure; the official commentary confirms that eligible residents may claim treaty benefits either upfront through a simplified procedure before the dividend is put into payment or afterwards through the standard refund procedure (BOI-RPPM-RCM-30-30-10-20, BOFiP-Impôts). The simplified route needs the residence certificate delivered to the French paying company before the wire; the normal route means suffering the full domestic rate first and reclaiming the difference from the French Treasury afterwards, with forms, translations and months of waiting. Third, keep the gross-to-net maths: on a 100,000 euro gross dividend to a treaty individual at 15 percent, France keeps 15,000 and you receive 85,000; at the 12.8 percent domestic rate you would receive 87,200. Your accountant should show both lines before the meeting votes, because the treaty rate is not always better than domestic law, and claiming a treaty means paperwork that the domestic rate does not require. Fourth, remember the other side of the border: most home countries tax the dividend again but grant a credit for the French withholding under the same treaty, so bring the French payment proof to your home-country accountant. France does not refund the withholding just because your home country also taxes you; the credit happens on the home-country return.
B. The EU parent-subsidiary exemption, its conditions, its anti-abuse limit, and the refund road when too much was withheld
Where the shareholder is not an individual but a company established in the European Union or the European Economic Area, France can go further than a reduced rate and levy nothing at all. Article 119 ter, paragraph 1, of the CGI states: “La retenue à la source prévue au 2 de l’article 119 bis n’est pas applicable aux dividendes distribués à une personne morale qui remplit les conditions énumérées au 2 du présent article par une société ou un organisme soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés au taux normal.” Dividends paid by a French company subject to corporate tax to a qualifying corporate shareholder escape withholding entirely (Article 119 ter, CGI, Légifrance). This is the French transposition of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive 2011/96/EU, and it is the provision that structures most European group holdings above a French SAS or SARL.
The conditions are cumulative and documentary. The parent must have its effective management in an EU or EEA state that has an administrative-assistance treaty with France, take one of the company forms listed in the directive, be liable to corporate tax without exemption or option, and, crucially, hold the capital: “Détenir directement, de façon ininterrompue depuis deux ans ou plus et en pleine propriété ou en nue-propriété, 10 % au moins du capital de la personne morale qui distribue les dividendes”. A direct holding of at least 10 percent, kept without interruption for two years or more, in full or bare ownership, opens the exemption (Article 119 ter, CGI, Légifrance). A parent that has not yet held the shares for two years can still qualify by committing to keep them for at least two years and appointing a French tax representative answerable for the withholding if the commitment is broken. Where the parent cannot credit the French withholding at home, the threshold drops: the rate “Le taux de participation mentionné au premier alinéa du présent c est ramené à 5 %” for a parent that is the beneficial owner of the dividends, holds participations meeting the Article 145 conditions, and is unable to credit the Article 119 bis withholding. A 5 percent holding suffices when the parent meets the Article 145 holding conditions and cannot credit the withholding (Article 119 ter, CGI, Légifrance). And Article 145 itself frames the domestic equivalent, the mère-fille regime for French parents, which the Code states “est applicable aux sociétés et autres organismes soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés au taux normal qui détiennent des participations satisfaisant aux conditions ci-après”, with registered shares and qualifying holdings (Article 145, CGI, Légifrance). Under Article 216, the dividends a parent receives “peuvent être retranchés du bénéfice net total de celle-ci, défalcation faite d’une quote-part de frais et charges”, and “La quote-part de frais et charges prévue au premier alinéa du présent I est fixée à 5 % du produit total des participations, crédit d’impôt compris.” In plain terms, 95 percent of the dividend is exempt at the parent level and 5 percent is added back to taxable profit, the famous 5 percent quote-part (Article 216, CGI, Légifrance). A German, Dutch or Spanish holding with 10 percent of a French SAS for two years therefore typically receives the dividend with zero French withholding and near-full exemption at home, subject to its own domestic quote-part.
But the exemption has a policed border. Article 119 ter, paragraph 3, denies it to artificial structures: “Le 1 ne s’applique pas aux dividendes distribués dans le cadre d’un montage ou d’une série de montages qui, ayant été mis en place pour obtenir, à titre d’objectif principal ou au titre d’un des objectifs principaux, un avantage fiscal allant à l’encontre de l’objet ou de la finalité de ce même 1, n’est pas authentique compte tenu de l’ensemble des faits et circonstances pertinents.” A scheme set up mainly to capture the exemption, contrary to its purpose, and inauthentic in light of all the facts, gets no exemption (Article 119 ter, CGI, Légifrance). A conduit holding with no staff, no premises and no economic activity beyond receiving and passing on the French dividend is the textbook target. If your European holding is substantive, document the substance before distributing: lease, payroll, board minutes held locally, active bank account, business purpose in the corporate objects. If it is a letterbox, restructure before the dividend, not after the control. The URSSAF, the social-security collection body, has no role in this chain, but do not confuse it with the SIE if correspondence arrives from both; dividend withholding is SIE and DGFiP (direction générale des finances publiques) territory only.
When too much was withheld despite everything, the refund road exists but rewards the organised. If the simplified procedure was missed, file the normal-procedure reclaim with the French tax office for non-residents: the residence certificate for the year of payment, the dividend slips, proof of the withholding suffered, and the treaty claim form, translated where needed. Expect months of processing and keep copies of everything sent, because the file often travels between the SIE of the distributing company and the non-residents office. Where the domestic rate was applied although the EU exemption was available, the same file plus proof of the holding percentage, holding period and tax status of the parent reclaims the full levy. And where the payer applied no treaty at all for years, as in the Paris 2026 case, quantify the loss year by year from the gross dividends, as the court did from 849,006 euros gross to a 50,040 euro award, then choose between an administrative claim and a liability action against the adviser who filed wrong. Time limits run fast in tax matters, so diary them on the day the error is found: reclaim and liability actions both expire, and a late discovery does not reopen them. For Paris-based groups, the file usually sits with the SIE of the arrondissement of the registered office, and companies that moved their siège across Paris or into Île-de-France should confirm which office holds the file before sending the reclaim, or the letters will chase each other for months.
Conclusion
Bringing French profit home from abroad follows a fixed sequence, and each link has one document that proves it. Vote the dividend at the meeting that approves the accounts, out of profit that Article L. 232-11 allows to distribute, because only that meeting can allocate retained earnings and any other meeting incurs nullity under the Cour de cassation rule of 12 February 2025. File return 2777 at the right rate before the wire, since the company is the debtor of the withholding and the Paris Court of Appeal of 15 September 2026 puts the choice of rate, treaty included, squarely on the distributing company. Apply domestic law first, 12.8 percent for individuals and 25 percent for companies under Articles 119 bis, 187 and 219, then the treaty, typically 15 percent for individuals with a residence certificate produced before payment, then the EU parent-subsidiary exemption under Article 119 ter for qualifying holdings of 10 percent over two years, policed by the inauthentic-scheme rule. Keep the minutes, the accounts, the Kbis, the paid 2777 and the residence proof in one file, give the bank a labelled wire, and hand the French payment proof to the home-country accountant for the foreign tax credit. Do this in order and the dividend crosses the border once, taxed once, documented everywhere; skip a step and it gets taxed twice, wired late, or litigated for years.
Need a quick opinion on your case.
Foreign founder with a French company sitting on profit, a dividend to vote, a withholding rate to check or a refund to chase? Our firm offers a telephone consultation within 48 hours with an avocat of the firm, initial telephone consultation: 80 EUR incl. VAT. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page. We assist clients in Paris and throughout Île-de-France, as well as founders based abroad.