Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Tenant in France: Getting Your Deposit Back, Reading the Inventory, and Challenging Deductions and Notices

You have found the flat in Lyon, Bordeaux or a quiet street in the 15th arrondissement of Paris, the rent looks fair, and the letting agent slides two documents across the table: the lease and the état des lieux, the descriptive inventory of the property’s condition. Before you reach for a pen, remember that in France the largest cheque a tenant writes after the first month’s rent is usually the dépôt de garantie, the security deposit, and the paper that decides whether you ever see that money again is the inventory you are about to sign. British tenants lose deposits every year for reasons that have nothing to do with damage: vague inventories signed in a hurry, deductions backed by no invoice, refunds that arrive months late, and notices to leave that appear suspiciously soon after a request for repairs. The good news is that French tenancy law protects tenants with unusual force. The deposit is capped, the refund clock is strict, late return triggers an automatic monthly penalty, and the courts punish landlords who send a cheque that never arrives or who issue a sham notice to recover the flat. This guide walks you through the whole arc of a French letting from a tenant’s point of view: what can lawfully be demanded on day one, how to build an inventory that protects you, how the refund rules work at the end, and how to challenge deductions and hostile notices with the exact legal weapons the Cour de cassation has confirmed in recent decisions.

I. The Deposit You Pay and the Inventory You Sign: Locking In Your Refund on Day One

A. How Much Deposit Can the Landlord Demand, and Which Clauses Should You Refuse to Sign?

The dépôt de garantie is a sum you hand to the landlord when the lease starts, held as security against unpaid rent, unpaid service charges and damage beyond normal wear. It is not an extra month’s rent and it is not a fee. French law caps it strictly: for an unfurnished letting used as your main home, the deposit cannot exceed one month’s rent excluding charges, and for a furnished letting used as your main home, it cannot exceed two months’ rent excluding charges. Any demand above those ceilings is unlawful, even if it is written into the lease, and the official service-public.fr guidance on deposits in residential leases sets out these limits and the refund mechanics for tenants who want to check the figures before signing (service-public.fr, deposit in a residential lease). The statute behind these rules is the law of 6 July 1989 on landlord-tenant relations, the loi n° 89-462 du 6 juillet 1989 tendant à améliorer les rapports locatifs, whose consolidated text is published in the official Journal officiel under reference JORFTEXT000000509310.

Two traps catch British newcomers at this stage. The first is the request for extra money beyond the permitted deposit: a second deposit, a cash advance on future rent or a payment to reserve the flat. French law forbids the landlord or agent from making you pay any sum beyond the rent, the lawful deposit and regulated agency fees in order to obtain the lease. If the agent insists, ask for the demand in writing and keep it, because a written unlawful demand is far easier to challenge than a verbal one remembered months later. The second trap is the tenant’s mirror image: when money is tight in the final month, some tenants simply stop paying the last month’s rent and tell the landlord to keep the deposit instead. Do not do this. The deposit is not a rent advance, the landlord can treat the missing payment as arrears and start formal recovery, and you lose the protection of the refund procedure described below. The official guidance confirms that the last month cannot unilaterally be set off against the deposit (service-public.fr, paying the last month with the deposit).

Read every clause of the lease before signing, because certain clauses are deemed abusive and therefore unwritten in a residential lease. The classic examples include clauses that impose an automatic rent deduction from a bank account, that make the tenant pay the landlord’s own costs, that forbid the tenant from seeking compensation, or that terminate the lease automatically for any reason other than those the statute allows. When you spot such a clause, do not simply cross it out and initial it without a trace. Photograph the page, keep the original wording, and raise the point in an email so that a written record exists. An abusive clause is already unenforceable, but the written record turns a later argument about what was agreed into a short discussion instead of a trial about memory.

Two tenant duties deserve attention at signing because they shape liability later. First, you must take out home insurance, the assurance habitation, covering fire, water damage and similar risks, and the landlord can ask for proof each year. Second, the Civil Code places fire liability squarely on the tenant. Article 1733 of the Civil Code provides, in the official Légifrance wording: “Il répond de l’incendie, à moins qu’il ne prouve : Que l’incendie est arrivé par cas fortuit ou force majeure, ou par vice de construction. Ou que le feu a été communiqué par une maison voisine.” (Civil Code, article 1733). Where several tenants share the building, article 1734 adds that they are each liable in proportion to the rental value of their part, unless they prove where the fire started or that it could not have started in their unit (Civil Code, article 1734). For a British tenant, the practical lesson is simple: never let the insurance lapse, keep the annual certificate, and send it to the landlord or agent by email so the sending is traceable.

One final signing point concerns the person standing behind you financially. If you offer a garant, a guarantor, the landlord may ask that person for proof of identity, income and address, and the official guidance on tenant guarantees explains the framework (service-public.fr, tenant guarantee). A guarantor living in the United Kingdom is not automatically invalid, a point our companion guide on the British rental file examines in detail (renting in France after Brexit with UK income and a UK guarantor). Whatever guarantee is agreed, make sure the guarantee deed states its amount and duration, and keep a signed copy. An open-ended guarantee with no figures is the document most likely to produce a painful surprise two years later.

B. The État des Lieux: the Photographs, Wording and Signatures That Decide Every Later Deduction

The état des lieux is the joint written description of the property’s condition, drawn up when you move in and again when you leave, in the presence of both sides or their representatives. Every deduction the landlord will ever make from your deposit must be measured against the difference between those two documents. A precise entry inventory is therefore worth more than any argument you could make later, however justified. Walk through every room, run the taps, flush the toilets, switch on the oven rings and the extractor, open and close every shutter and window, test the intercom, count the keys and note their type, read the meters, and write down stains, cracks, scratches, limescale, mould spots and wobbly fittings with their exact location. Then photograph everything in daylight, including the inside of the oven, the seals around the bath, the flooring joints and the walls behind doors, and make sure each photograph carries a date, whether from the camera metadata or by including that day’s newspaper in one frame per room.

The legal reason this matters is a presumption that works against the tenant who signs carelessly. Article 1731 of the Civil Code states: “S’il n’a pas été fait d’état des lieux, le preneur est présumé les avoir reçus en bon état de réparations locatives, et doit les rendre tels, sauf la preuve contraire.” (Civil Code, article 1731). In plain terms, if there is no inventory, or if the inventory says nothing about a defect, the law presumes you received that part of the flat in good tenant-repair condition and must return it in that condition unless you prove otherwise. A bare printed form that says “good condition” in every box, signed in the hallway in three minutes, is almost as dangerous as no inventory at all. Insist on detailed wording, add handwritten reservations in the margins, and never accept an agent’s promise that details “will be added later”. If the other side refuses a joint inventory, send a formal request by registered letter, take your own dated photographs with a witness, and consider having the inventory drawn up by a commissaire de justice, the sworn officer formerly called a huissier, whose report no court will brush aside. The cost of that report is shared between landlord and tenant by law, and it is modest next to a lost deposit.

The burden of proof in any later dispute follows a simple rule that British tenants should memorise. Article 1353 of the Civil Code provides: “Celui qui réclame l’exécution d’une obligation doit la prouver. Réciproquement, celui qui se prétend libéré doit justifier le paiement ou le fait qui a produit l’extinction de son obligation.” (Civil Code, article 1353). Applied to deposits, this means the landlord who keeps part of your money must prove the damage and justify the amount, while you must prove what you paid and when you returned the keys. Keep bank transfer references for the deposit and every rent payment, keep the key handover receipt, the remise des clés, and keep every email with the agency. Tenants who can produce a dated paper trail usually recover their money without ever seeing a courtroom, because the landlord’s adviser will read the file and advise settlement.

For British readers dealing with the wider admin of a move, the United Kingdom government maintains general guidance for Britons living in France covering residence, healthcare and practical steps after Brexit (GOV.UK, living in France guidance). It does not replace French tenancy law, but it helps to situate the lease among the other tasks of arrival, from the visa or Withdrawal Agreement permit to the French bank account from which the rent will actually be paid.

II. The Refund and the Fight: Getting the Money Back and Challenging What Is Kept

A. The One-Month or Two-Month Clock, Lawful Deductions and the 10 Percent Monthly Penalty

The refund clock starts on the day you hand back the keys, and it runs for one month if the exit inventory matches the entry inventory, or two months if there are differences. That comparison of the two états des lieux is the whole mechanism: identical condition means fast refund, recorded differences mean the landlord gets an extra month to obtain quotes and invoices. The landlord may deduct only sums that are justified and documented, typically unpaid rent or charges arrears and the cost of repairing damage that goes beyond ordinary wear, the vétusté and fair wear and tear that no tenant can be charged for. Each deduction must be backed by paperwork: the two inventories showing the deterioration, invoices or firm quotes for the repair, and statements for any charges arrears. A lump sum described as “cleaning and miscellaneous repairs” with no invoice attached is not a justification, and a deduction for repainting a wall that was already marked on the entry inventory, or for replacing a ten-year-old carpet at full new value, will not survive serious scrutiny.

When the landlord misses the deadline, the statute punishes delay automatically. The Cour de cassation restated the rule in a decision of 12 February 2026 that every tenant should know. The case concerned a furnished letting where, after the tenant left on 11 March 2021, the landlord claimed to have repaid the deposit by posting a cheque on 9 April 2021, a cheque the tenant said he never received and which was never cashed. The trial judge accepted the landlord’s story because the cheque stub proved sending and no complaint had arrived for months. The Cour de cassation quashed that reasoning. It recalled first that “Aux termes du premier de ces textes, celui qui réclame l’exécution d’une obligation doit la prouver et, réciproquement, celui qui se prétend libéré doit justifier le paiement ou le fait qui a produit l’extinction de son obligation.” It then stated the deposit rule: “Il résulte du second qu’à défaut de restitution dans le délai de deux mois à compter de la remise des clés, le dépôt de garantie restant dû au locataire est majoré d’une somme égale à 10 % du loyer mensuel principal, pour chaque période mensuelle commencée en retard et que la majoration court de plein droit à l’issue du délai de deux mois suivant la remise des clés.” (Cour de cassation, Third Civil Chamber, 12 February 2026, no. 24-21.258). The court added that ruling as the judge had, “sans constater que le bailleur justifiait de la réception du chèque par le locataire, qui la contestait”, violated the cited texts. Three lessons follow. First, sending a cheque is not paying: under article 1342 of the Civil Code, “Le paiement est l’exécution volontaire de la prestation due. Il doit être fait sitôt que la dette devient exigible. Il libère le débiteur à l’égard du créancier et éteint la dette, sauf lorsque la loi ou le contrat prévoit une subrogation dans les droits du créancier.” (Civil Code, article 1342). Only receipt and cashing count. Second, the 10 percent monthly uplift runs automatically once the two months expire, without any formal demand. Third, the landlord bears the proof of actual receipt, so a tenant who never got the cheque owes no apology for complaining late.

Put this ruling to practical use the moment a refund stalls. As soon as the one-month or two-month mark passes, send a mise en demeure, a formal demand, by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, recalling the key handover date, the deposit amount, the 10 percent monthly uplift and a short deadline to pay. Attach copies of the entry and exit inventories, the transfer proof for the deposit and the key receipt. If the landlord answers with deductions, require the invoices line by line and compare each item with the two inventories. Where the parties cannot agree, the commission départementale de conciliation, the departmental conciliation board for tenancy disputes, offers a structured settlement route before any court claim, and the housing pages of service-public.fr explain how to seize the local board (service-public.fr, housing rights and procedures). If conciliation fails, the claim goes to the juge des contentieux de la protection, the specialist judge for residential tenancy disputes at the local tribunal judiciaire, who can order the refund, the uplift and damages. Bring the complete file: lease, both inventories with photographs, payment proofs, the demand letter and its receipt slip, and the landlord’s deduction documents. Judges decide deposit cases largely on documents, and the tenant with the tidy bundle normally wins.

During the tenancy itself, two Civil Code provisions protect the everyday quality of the home and are worth invoking in writing before any dispute hardens. Article 1719 obliges the landlord, by the very nature of the contract and with no special clause needed: “1° De délivrer au preneur la chose louée et, s’il s’agit de son habitation principale, un logement décent. Lorsque des locaux loués à usage d’habitation sont impropres à cet usage, le bailleur ne peut se prévaloir de la nullité du bail ou de sa résiliation pour demander l’expulsion de l’occupant ; 2° D’entretenir cette chose en état de servir à l’usage pour lequel elle a été louée ; 3° D’en faire jouir paisiblement le preneur pendant la durée du bail ; 4° D’assurer également la permanence et la qualité des plantations.” (Civil Code, article 1719). Article 1720 continues: “Le bailleur est tenu de délivrer la chose en bon état de réparations de toute espèce. Il doit y faire, pendant la durée du bail, toutes les réparations qui peuvent devenir nécessaires, autres que les locatives.” (Civil Code, article 1720). And article 1721 guarantees the tenant against hidden defects: “Il est dû garantie au preneur pour tous les vices ou défauts de la chose louée qui en empêchent l’usage, quand même le bailleur ne les aurait pas connus lors du bail. S’il résulte de ces vices ou défauts quelque perte pour le preneur, le bailleur est tenu de l’indemniser.” (Civil Code, article 1721). When the boiler fails in January or a hidden leak ruins the flooring, these are the texts to cite in the registered letter requesting repair, with photographs and a reasonable deadline. A landlord who lets the property decay while planning deductions at exit will find these same texts turned against the deduction claim.

B. When the Landlord Reaches for a Notice Instead: Sham Repossession, Sale Notices and Your Remedies Before the Judge

Sometimes the dispute is not about an invoice but about the flat itself: after you complain about the deposit, the damp or the broken heating, a congé, a formal notice to leave, arrives. French law gives the landlord only three lawful reasons to end a residential lease at its term: repossession to live in the property or house a close relative, sale of the property, or a legitimate and serious ground such as persistent breach by the tenant. The notice period for a landlord’s notice is six months before the end of the lease, and the notice must state its ground. The Cour de cassation recalled the framework in a decision of 12 October 2023: “lorsque le bailleur donne congé à son locataire, ce congé doit être justifié soit par sa décision de reprendre ou de vendre le logement, soit par un motif légitime et sérieux, notamment l’inexécution par le locataire de l’une des obligations lui incombant. A peine de nullité, le congé donné par le bailleur doit indiquer le motif allégué et, en cas de reprise, les nom et adresse du bénéficiaire de la reprise ainsi que la nature du lien existant entre le bailleur et le bénéficiaire de la reprise qui ne peut être que le bailleur, son conjoint, le partenaire auquel il est lié par un pacte civil de solidarité enregistré à la date du congé, son concubin notoire depuis au moins un an à la date du congé, ses ascendants, ses descendants ou ceux de son conjoint, de son partenaire ou de son concubin notoire. Lorsqu’il donne congé à son locataire pour reprendre le logement, le bailleur justifie du caractère réel et sérieux de sa décision de reprise. Le délai de préavis applicable au congé est de six mois lorsqu’il émane du bailleur.” (Cour de cassation, Third Civil Chamber, 12 October 2023, no. 22-18.580). Check any notice against each element of that passage: the ground stated, the names, addresses and family link for a repossession, and the six-month period. A notice that omits its ground is void, and a void notice cannot oblige you to leave.

That same decision contains a subtle point that tenants often misunderstand. The court approved the appeal judges for holding that a notice is not void merely because it does not itself set out, as a formal element, a full demonstration of the genuine and serious character of the repossession decision. In other words, the notice does not have to contain a long essay proving sincerity; the proof can be debated before the judge, who may examine of his or her own motion whether the stated ground for the notice is genuine. Do not therefore throw a notice away on that single formal point. The real battle is evidence: is the repossession genuine or a pretext to re-let at a higher rent or to punish a tenant who asked for repairs? In the 2023 case the landlord proved sincerity with electoral-roll registration, renovation invoices after the tenants left, new utility and internet contracts and a notification to the tax authorities, and the court accepted that the owner could keep a second home in the south while making the repossessed flat the main residence. Learn the lesson in reverse: if your landlord serves a repossession notice and then re-lets the flat within months, advertises it online or carries out no works and moves nobody in, preserve every trace at once, including dated screenshots, new letting advertisements and testimony from neighbours, because those are exactly the materials on which fraudulent-notice damages are won.

A second recent decision gives tenants an even sharper weapon in one specific but painful situation. On 16 April 2026 the Cour de cassation held that where the person named as the beneficiary of the repossession dies before the notice takes effect, the notice falls with that person. The court restated the statute: “Selon ce texte, lorsque le bailleur donne congé à son locataire, ce congé doit être justifié soit par sa décision de reprendre ou de vendre le logement, soit par un motif légitime et sérieux. A peine de nullité, le congé donné par le bailleur doit indiquer le motif allégué et, en cas de reprise, les nom et adresse du bénéficiaire de la reprise ainsi que la nature du lien existant entre le bailleur et le bénéficiaire de la reprise. Lorsqu’il donne congé à son locataire pour reprendre le logement, le bailleur justifie du caractère réel et sérieux de sa décision de reprise.” It then drew the consequence: “Il s’en déduit que les conditions de la reprise du logement devant être appréciées en la personne de son bénéficiaire, le décès de celui-ci, survenu avant la date d’expiration du délai de préavis, prive d’effet le congé aux fins de reprise.” (Cour de cassation, Third Civil Chamber, 16 April 2026, no. 24-13.191). In that case the heir tried to carry on with the deceased mother’s notice and add his own intention to move in; the court refused, because the notice’s conditions are assessed in the person of the named beneficiary. If you receive a notice naming an elderly parent and learn of the death before the notice expires, do not vacate on the strength of that document: write to the heir’s representative, keep paying the rent, and ask a lawyer to confirm in writing that the notice has lapsed.

Procedure matters as much as substance when a notice arrives. Never leave solely on the strength of a letter, however official its letterhead looks. Only a court can order your eviction, and only a commissaire de justice acting on a court order can enforce it, so a landlord who changes the locks or removes your belongings without a judgment commits a separate wrong that can itself attract damages. Reply to any notice by registered letter within days, contesting precisely what is contestable: the missing ground, the wrong period, the absent family link, the deceased beneficiary, or the pretextual motive. Continue paying the rent and charges throughout, because arrears hand the landlord the legitimate ground the notice may currently lack. Gather the file a judge would want: the lease, the notice and its envelope, proof of rent payments, the correspondence about repairs or deposit that preceded the notice, and any evidence of the landlord’s true intention. Then seek advice quickly, because challenge deadlines and the timetable of the lease term do not wait, and an early registered reply often brings the other side back to negotiation before costs mount on both sides.

Conclusion

A French letting rewards the tenant who writes things down. The deposit is capped and refundable on a strict clock, the inventory decides every deduction, late repayment costs the landlord 10 percent of the monthly rent per month started, and a posted cheque that never arrives is not payment at all. Notices to leave must state a lawful ground, allow six months and name a living beneficiary whose genuine intention the judge can verify. None of this requires confrontation from day one. Photograph the flat, keep every receipt and email, answer every letter by registered post, and raise problems early in writing. Most deposit disputes settle once the landlord’s adviser sees a complete tenant file quoting the correct texts. Where settlement fails, the conciliation board and then the protection judge decide on documents, and the three Cour de cassation decisions explained above show how those documents are read. For a British tenant newly arrived after Brexit, that discipline is the difference between a deposit quietly kept and a refund paid with the statutory uplift, and between a frightening notice and an orderly challenge that protects the home.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Talk it through with a lawyer of the firm within 48 hours. Telephone consultation: 80 EUR incl. VAT. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22, or write via our contact page. We assist British tenants across Paris and Île-de-France, and remotely elsewhere in France.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.