Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Tenant Renting in France After Brexit: Getting Your Deposit Back, Challenging a Congé and Stopping an Eviction

Every year, thousands of British citizens sign their first French residential lease: a flat in Paris while a purchase goes through, a village house in the Dordogne for a trial year, a studio for a child studying at a French university. The signing feels familiar until something goes wrong. The landlord keeps the whole dépôt de garantie (security deposit) for repainting that was already due. A congé (formal notice terminating the lease) arrives by recorded delivery and gives you six months to leave a home you expected to keep for years. Or a letter headed commandement de quitter les lieux (order to vacate) tells you to leave within two months. At that point British reflexes mislead: there is no tenancy deposit protection scheme, no section 21 that works the way you expect, and no lawful self-help eviction. Almost all French residential letting is governed by a single statute, the loi n° 89-462 du 6 juillet 1989, applied by a specialist housing judge, the juge des contentieux de la protection (protection litigation judge), and interpreted by the Cour de cassation (France’s highest civil court), which hands down tenant-friendly rulings every year. Since Brexit you rent as a third-country national, often against a visa or carte de séjour (residence permit) timetable, so every procedural deadline bites harder. This guide explains, with the exact statutory wording and the most recent decisions, how to recover your deposit when you leave, how to test whether your landlord’s congé is valid, and how to slow down or stop an eviction.

I. Getting Your Deposit Back When You Leave Your French Rental

A. How much your landlord can take, what the two inventories decide, and the one-month or two-month refund clock

French law caps the deposit before any dispute can arise. The official service-public guidance states that the security deposit for an unfurnished letting is capped at one month’s rent excluding charges, and that the amount must appear in the lease. No top-up during the tenancy and no increase at renewal are allowed. If your landlord demanded two months on an unfurnished flat, or an extra payment mid-lease, that demand itself is unlawful, and you should challenge it in writing before you move out rather than letting it contaminate the exit negotiation. Keep the signed lease, every rent receipt and proof of each payment: the refund clock, the uplift for lateness and the justification of every deduction all depend on documents, never on recollection.

Everything then turns on two documents: the état des lieux d’entrée (check-in inventory) and the état des lieux de sortie (check-out inventory). French law requires the comparison of the two before a single euro can be retained, and the Court of Cassation enforces that requirement strictly. Where the parties cannot agree the inventory together, article 3-2 of the 1989 statute provides that “si l’état des lieux ne peut être établi contradictoirement et amiablement par les parties ou par un tiers mandaté par elle, il est établi par un huissier de justice, devenu commissaire de justice, sur l’initiative de la partie la plus diligente, à frais partagés par moitié entre le bailleur et le locataire.” In plain terms, if your landlord will not meet you for a joint inspection, either side can instruct a commissaire de justice (court officer, formerly called huissier de justice), with the cost split equally. The consequence of skipping that step is severe for landlords. In a decision of 16 November 2023 on appeal No 22-19.422, the Third Civil Chamber held that “un état des lieux de sortie établi unilatéralement par le bailleur, sans recours à un commissaire de justice, et dont le défaut de contradiction est dû à sa carence, ne peut faire la preuve de dégradations imputables au locataire.” A check-out report the landlord draws up alone, when the failure to involve you is the landlord’s own fault, proves nothing against you. Attend both inspections in person, photograph every room with a date stamp, note the meter readings, and insist that any disagreement is written into the report before you sign it. If the landlord refuses to attend, instruct a commissaire de justice yourself and send your forwarding address by recorded delivery on the same day.

The refund deadlines are short and the sanction for missing them is automatic. Service-public confirms that the landlord must return the deposit “within a maximum period of 1 month” where the two inventories are identical, and “within a maximum period of 2 months” where they differ. The two-month period runs from the return of the keys, and the uplift for delay runs by right, without any formal demand. The Court of Cassation restated the mechanism on 12 February 2026 in appeal No 24-21.258: “à défaut de restitution dans le délai de deux mois à compter de la remise des clés, le dépôt de garantie restant dû au locataire est majoré d’une somme égale à 10 % du loyer mensuel principal, pour chaque période mensuelle commencée en retard et que la majoration court de plein droit à l’issue du délai de deux mois suivant la remise des clés.” Every month begun late adds ten per cent of the monthly rent excluding charges, automatically. That same decision contains a warning that cuts both ways. The landlord claimed to have posted a refund cheque in time; the tenant said it never arrived and it was never cashed. The Court recalled that “celui qui réclame l’exécution d’une obligation doit la prouver et, réciproquement, celui qui se prétend libéré doit justifier le paiement ou le fait qui a produit l’extinction de son obligation”, and then quashed the lower court’s ruling in these terms: “En statuant ainsi, sans constater que le bailleur justifiait de la réception du chèque par le locataire, qui la contestait, le juge a violé les textes susvisés.” Sending a cheque is not paying; only receipt and cashing count. The operative part reads “CASSE ET ANNULE, mais seulement en ce qu’il rejette la demande formée par M. [Z] au titre de la majoration de dix pour cent du loyer mensuel due pour chaque mois de retard dans la restitution du dépôt de garantie”. For you as a tenant the lesson is practical: pay by bank transfer with a reference, keep the statements, and if you are the one waiting for a refund, put the landlord on notice in writing as soon as the deadline passes, because the uplift accrues month by month while you wait.

One timing trap deserves emphasis because it affects British tenants in blocks of flats disproportionately. Where the building is in collective ownership, service charges are reconciled once a year, and the landlord may keep a provision pending that reconciliation. In a decision of 31 May 2018 on appeal No 17-18.069, the Court recalled that “Vu l’article 22 de la loi du 6 juillet 1989”, the deposit exists to guarantee performance of the tenant’s obligations, and that in a collectively owned building the final reconciliation and the return of the balance, after deducting sums owed to the landlord or owed by the landlord in the tenant’s place, take place in the month following final approval of the building accounts. Any deduction is allowed only “sous réserve qu’elles soient dûment justifiées”, on condition it is duly evidenced. A landlord who withholds a round sum for future charges without producing the building accounts, the annual statement and the calculation is not justified, and the ten per cent uplift continues to run on whatever balance is genuinely owed to you. Ask for the décompte de charges (service-charge statement) with the supporting building accounts, check the dates, and challenge any provision that has no document behind it. The official service-public guide to notice given by the landlord summarises these statutory conditions, so you can cite the exact article in correspondence.

B. Challenging a deduction: what justifies a retention, what proves nothing, and the demand, conciliation and court route

A lawful deduction has three ingredients, and the absence of any one of them defeats it. First, a difference between the check-in and check-out inventories describing the same item in the same detail. Second, proof that the deterioration exceeds normal wear and tear, the vétusté (age-related wear) that the landlord must absorb, such as faded paint after a ten-year letting or a carpet worn thin along its normal path. Third, an invoice for reinstatement, a facture, or at minimum a priced statement tied to the specific damage, produced to you with the breakdown. What the landlord cannot do is any of the following: keep the deposit because the flat was not professionally cleaned where the inventories show no such obligation and no damage; charge a flat-rate repaint of the whole dwelling when only one marked wall differs between the two reports; set off alleged damage against the deposit without sending you the comparative inventories and the vouchers; or rely on a unilaterally drawn-up exit report where your absence was the landlord’s doing, since, as seen above, that report cannot prove tenant-caused damage. Photographs you took jointly at check-in, ideally countersigned or exchanged by email at the time, routinely decide these cases: they fix the original condition better than any later argument.

The garden in the Orléans case illustrates how judges handle vague claims. The landlord resisted refund by pointing to an unweeded garden, but the only voucher was a global gardening invoice that did not separate the cost of clearing the beds identified in the inventory from general maintenance. The Court did not allow the judge to throw out the whole claim or to accept the whole invoice blindly; the loss as established in principle had to be valued on the evidence, each item measured against what the inventories actually showed. Translate that into method: go through the landlord’s letter line by line, match every euro to an inventory difference and a dated voucher, strike out everything unmatched, and put the resulting balance in a recorded-delivery demand letter (mise en demeure) giving a short deadline and quoting the one-month or two-month period with the ten per cent uplift. Most professionally managed files settle at this stage, because the agency knows the uplift math as well as you do.

If the demand fails, France offers a free intermediate step before court: the commission départementale de conciliation (departmental conciliation board), which hears deposit, charge, repair and notice disputes for the area where the dwelling sits. Either party can refer the file by letter with copies of the lease, both inventories, the demand and the vouchers; the board hears both sides and issues a written opinion within two months in most departments. A landlord who ignores a reasoned opinion starts any later court case at a disadvantage, and many insurers require the conciliation attempt before funding litigation. If conciliation fails or the landlord does not attend, the claim goes to the juge des contentieux de la protection of the place where the dwelling is located, by summons or by simplified declaration for smaller sums. Bring the complete file: lease, both inventories, key-handover receipt, forwarding-address letter with its postal slip, bank statements showing rent paid, the demand letter, the conciliation opinion and a schedule computing the uplift month by month from the end of the one-month or two-month period. Ask for the principal, the uplift, interest and a costs order, and check any legal-expenses insurance attached to your home or bank contract, which often covers this litigation.

Two Brexit-specific points belong in this section. First, assemble your tenant file, the dossier de location, with care from the start: passport, visa or carte de séjour, employment contract or evidence of resources, and previous rent receipts. Landlords may only request documents from a closed statutory list, and demands for your full UK bank history or medical records exceed it. Second, a British newcomer without a French guarantor is routinely pressed to offer one; the public Visale guarantee scheme, described in the official service-public Visale guide, exists precisely for tenants without a local personal guarantor, and any landlord who refuses every guarantee while demanding an unlawful deposit is signalling a tenancy to avoid. The British government’s own Living in France guide for British nationals is a useful checklist for the residence and healthcare side of the move, but it does not replace the French statute when money is at stake: in a deposit dispute, cite the article, the inventory and the voucher, in that order.

II. Staying or Being Told to Leave: Notice Periods, Congé Validity and Eviction Defence

A. Your notice and your landlord’s congé: six months, a stated ground, a named beneficiary, and a real and serious plan

Your own freedom to leave is the most protective feature of the French system. You may terminate the lease at any time, for any reason or for none, and no justification is ever required from you. The only questions are the length of the notice and whether it was validly served. The default period is three months; it falls to one month in the listed situations set by the statute, which include dwellings in a designated high-demand area, a zone tendue, professional relocation, a first job, job loss, state of health, or receipt of certain benefits. Paris and almost the whole of the Île-de-France lie in a zone tendue, so a British tenant in the capital or its inner suburbs will normally qualify for the one-month period, but qualification alone is not enough: state the ground expressly in the notice letter and attach or offer the supporting evidence. Serve notice by recorded delivery with proof of receipt, by act of a commissaire de justice, or by hand delivery against a signed receipt; ordinary post and email are unsafe unless the landlord acknowledges them in writing. Time runs from receipt, not from posting, so keep the acknowledgement slip. You owe rent and charges through the notice period even if you move out early, unless the landlord re-lets the flat with your agreement before expiry. Insist on a key-handover appointment producing a signed exit inventory, record your forwarding address in the same document, and photograph the meters: without that address, as seen above, the late-refund uplift cannot run.

The landlord’s position is the mirror image: no freedom, strict forms, and long deadlines. Service-public confirms the headline rule that the tenant must receive the landlord’s notice at least six months before the end of the lease. The Court of Cassation spelled out the full discipline on 12 October 2023 in appeal No 22-18.580: “lorsque le bailleur donne congé à son locataire, ce congé doit être justifié soit par sa décision de reprendre ou de vendre le logement, soit par un motif légitime et sérieux, notamment l’inexécution par le locataire de l’une des obligations lui incombant. A peine de nullité, le congé donné par le bailleur doit indiquer le motif allégué et, en cas de reprise, les nom et adresse du bénéficiaire de la reprise ainsi que la nature du lien existant entre le bailleur et le bénéficiaire de la reprise qui ne peut être que le bailleur, son conjoint, le partenaire auquel il est lié par un pacte civil de solidarité enregistré à la date du congé, son concubin notoire depuis au moins un an à la date du congé, ses ascendants, ses descendants ou ceux de son conjoint, de son partenaire ou de son concubin notoire. Lorsqu’il donne congé à son locataire pour reprendre le logement, le bailleur justifie du caractère réel et sérieux de sa décision de reprise. Le délai de préavis applicable au congé est de six mois lorsqu’il émane du bailleur.” Three practical tests follow. First, the ground must be stated in the notice on pain of nullity: a congé that says nothing, or that invokes sale and repossession in the same breath without choosing, is void. Second, a repossession for a relative only works for the closed circle of beneficiaries the Court lists; a cousin, a friend or a company does not qualify. Third, the plan must be genuine: the landlord who claims to repossess for himself while the flat is advertised for re-letting, or who claims sale while refusing genuine offers, faces annulment and damages for fraudulent notice, the congé frauduleux.

The judge controls that genuineness even if you raise nothing. The same decision recalls that “en cas de contestation, le juge peut, même d’office, vérifier la réalité du motif du congé et le respect des obligations prévues par celui-ci.” So challenge a suspicious congé promptly and in writing, ask for the beneficiary’s details and the evidence of the stated plan, and search whether the dwelling is offered elsewhere. And note a sharper trap the Court confirmed on 16 April 2026 in appeal No 24-13.191: repossession is assessed in the person of the named beneficiary, so that “les conditions de la reprise du logement devant être appréciées en la personne de son bénéficiaire, le décès de celui-ci, survenu avant la date d’expiration du délai de préavis, prive d’effet le congé aux fins de reprise.” In that case the landlady who had given notice to repossess for herself died before the notice expired, and her son tried to take over the notice for himself. The Court quashed the eviction because, as it put it, “alors qu’elle avait constaté que la bénéficiaire de la reprise désignée dans le congé était décédée avant la date d’effet de ce congé, la cour d’appel a violé le texte susvisé.” An heir cannot recycle a dead beneficiary’s notice; a fresh notice in the heir’s own name, with a fresh six months, is required. If your landlord sells during the lease, remember that the buyer steps into the lease on the same terms: a sale is not a termination, and any notice the buyer gives must itself satisfy the six-month rule and the applicable seasonal protections.

B. Unpaid rent and court-ordered eviction: the two-month commandement, judge-granted delays and the winter truce

Where rent goes unpaid, French procedure moves in slow, formal stages, and each stage gives you a chance to pay, negotiate or ask the judge for time. The standard opening is a commandement de payer (formal demand to pay) served by a commissaire de justice, which must reproduce the statutory warnings and gives you two months to pay the arrears or to activate a guarantee. If the lease contains a clause résolutoire (termination clause), that clause can only operate after the two months expire unpaid, and even then only a judge can confirm termination and order eviction. Never ignore a commandement: use the two months to clear the arrears, to agree a written repayment schedule, to call on the Visale guarantee or your insurer, or to apply to the housing solidarity fund, the Fonds de solidarité pour le logement, through your département. If you pay in full within the period, the clause is neutralised and the lease continues. If you cannot, prepare the court file immediately: proof of income and resources, evidence of the cause of the arrears, proof of partial payments, medical certificates where relevant, and any correspondence showing you sought an arrangement.

Even after a court orders eviction, the law inserts breathing space before the removal van can arrive. First, the order itself cannot be enforced at once: the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures provides that “elle ne peut avoir lieu qu’à l’expiration d’un délai de deux mois qui suit le commandement, sans préjudice des dispositions des articles L. 412-3 à L. 412-7”, meaning that once the commandement de quitter les lieux (order to vacate) has been served, at least two months must pass before physical eviction. Second, the judge who orders eviction, or a later application to the enforcement judge, the juge de l’exécution, can grant additional time. The statute states that “Le juge peut accorder des délais renouvelables aux occupants de lieux habités ou de locaux à usage professionnel, dont l’expulsion a été ordonnée judiciairement, chaque fois que le relogement des intéressés ne peut avoir lieu dans des conditions normales.” These renewable grace periods, the délais de grâce, run from three months to three years depending on good faith, repayment efforts, age, health and family circumstances; they suspend enforcement while you pay the occupation indemnity fixed by the judgment. Third, the winter truce, the trêve hivernale, suspends enforcement every year: “il est sursis à toute mesure d’expulsion non exécutée à la date du 1er novembre de chaque année jusqu’au 31 mars de l’année suivante, à moins que le relogement des intéressés soit assuré dans des conditions suffisantes respectant l’unité et les besoins de la famille.” No physical eviction between 1 November and 31 March unless you have been properly rehoused, with only narrow exceptions for squatters who forced entry and for occupiers whose rehousing has been secured. The truce does not cancel the debt or the court order, and proceedings continue during winter, but it moves the enforcement date and gives you months to find a solution.

Throughout any arrears dispute, observe one golden rule: never stop paying rent on your own authority, even where the flat has defects and you feel justified. Only the judge may reduce, suspend or authorise deposit of the rent with a third party, and a tenant who withholds rent unilaterally hands the landlord the serious breach needed for termination. If the dwelling has defects affecting health or safety, report them in writing with photographs, set a reasonable deadline for repair, and, if nothing moves, refer the file to the commission départementale de conciliation and then to the judge, who can order the works on a timetable and adjust the rent in the meantime. Keep paying while the case runs, keep every receipt, and keep the court informed of each payment: judges reward tenants who pay what they can and punish those who pay nothing. Where co-tenants signed together, check the clause de solidarité (joint-liability clause): each co-tenant can be pursued for the whole arrears, and one partner’s departure does not end liability until that partner gives proper individual notice and the solidarity period expires. For British tenants whose visa or carte de séjour renewal depends on proof of address and resources, an eviction judgment or a trail of unpaid rent can damage the prefecture file as well as the housing file, so treat the first missed payment as the moment to seek advice, not the third.

Conclusion

Renting in France as a British tenant after Brexit is entirely manageable once the method is understood. The deposit is capped at one month for an unfurnished letting, refundable within one month where the inventories match and two months otherwise, with an automatic ten per cent monthly uplift for lateness that the courts enforce strictly against landlords who cannot prove the money reached you. Every deduction must be matched to an inventory difference and a dated voucher; a unilaterally drawn-up exit report where your absence was the landlord’s fault proves nothing, and round sums held for future charges without the building accounts are not duly evidenced. Your own notice can be given at any time, with the reduced one-month period available in Paris and the other high-demand zones where the letter states the ground. A landlord’s congé must arrive at least six months before term, state its ground on pain of nullity, name a qualifying beneficiary for repossession, and reflect a genuine plan that the judge can verify on the court’s own motion; a notice whose beneficiary dies before expiry dies with her. If arrears arise, the two-month commandement, the two-month wait after the order to vacate, the renewable grace periods and the winter truce from 1 November to 31 March give you layered protection while you pay, negotiate or rehouse. Most disputes settle at the demand letter or conciliation stage when the file is complete; the cases that reach court are usually those where one side kept nothing in writing. Keep every letter, every receipt and every photograph, and the law will do the rest.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Facing a withheld deposit, a disputed inventory, a congé argument or an eviction threat from your landlord? Get a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page. For homes in Paris and the Île-de-France, bring your lease, both inventories and your photographs to the call.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.