Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company’s Bank Account Was Refused: Droit au Compte, Banque de France Designation and How a Foreign Owner Gets Operating From Abroad

Your French company exists on paper, the articles are signed, the funds for the share capital are waiting — and then the bank says no. No operating account, no payment tools, no way to pay the first supplier or receive the first invoice. For a foreign founder running the project from London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, that single refusal can freeze the whole launch for weeks. This guide explains why French banks turn down foreign-owned companies, what the bank legally owes you when it refuses, and how you force a solution from abroad: the statutory right to an account (droit au compte), the Banque de France designation procedure, and the practical split between the capital deposit account (compte bloqué) and the day-to-day operating account. Every step below is anchored in the exact statute or court decision that creates it, so you can act — or instruct counsel — with the right reference in hand.

I. Why a French bank refuses your company’s account and what the refusal letter must contain

A. How a foreign-owned company triggers a refusal: identity checks, beneficial owners and missing substance

A French bank is not a free agent when it opens an account for your company. Before entering into a business relationship, it must, by statute, identify its client and, where applicable, the beneficial owner and verify these identification elements on presentation of any written document of probative value, under Article L. 561-5 of the Code monétaire et financier (Monetary and Financial Code). The beneficial owner (bénéficiaire effectif) is defined by Article L. 561-2-2 of the same Code as the natural person or persons who ultimately control the client, directly or indirectly, or on whose behalf a transaction is carried out or an activity exercised. For a foreign founder, that means the bank must trace the chain of ownership up to you personally, even through a foreign holding company, and verify your identity with probative documents.

In practice, four features of a foreign-owned file make the bank hesitate. First, non-French identity and corporate documents: passports, foreign company registers, powers of attorney and articles written in another language must be authenticated — frequently by apostille under the Hague Convention — and translated by a sworn translator (traducteur assermenté) before the bank’s compliance team accepts them. Second, distance: where the legal representative (président of a SAS, gérant of a SARL) lives abroad and never appears at the branch, the bank cannot easily complete the face-to-face verification its internal procedures demand. Third, opaque ownership chains: a Delaware LLC or a multi-layer holding sitting above the French SAS forces the bank to identify every intermediate layer, and each missing certificate stalls the file. Fourth, absent economic substance in France: no signed commercial lease, no French phone number, no local supplier contracts and a share capital of one euro signal, to a risk-averse compliance officer, a file that costs more to verify than it will ever earn the bank.

The decisive point is that the bank is legally entitled — indeed required — to walk away where it cannot complete these checks. Article L. 561-8 of the Code monétaire et financier provides that where a person mentioned in Article L. 561-2 is unable to satisfy the obligations laid down in Article L. 561-5 or Article L. 561-5-1, it shall carry out no transaction, whatever the terms, and shall establish or pursue no business relationship. That text expressly extends to the situation where a credit institution has been designated by the Banque de France on the basis of Article L. 312-1 and the institution was unable to satisfy one of the obligations laid down in Article L. 561-5 or Article L. 561-5-1. In plain terms: anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing duties override even a Banque de France designation. A refusal grounded in genuinely incomplete identification is therefore lawful, and the remedy is to complete the file, not to protest the refusal itself.

This is why the commercial form you chose matters upstream. A SAS (société par actions simplifiée), governed by Article L. 227-1 of the Code de commerce (Commercial Code), borrows most of its capital rules from the law on sociétés anonymes, while a SARL follows its own regime under which shares representing cash contributions must be paid up for at least one fifth of their amount pursuant to Article L. 223-7 of the Code de commerce. Banks know the SAS inside out; an exotic foreign vehicle named as shareholder, or a barely capitalised company with no French address, multiplies the questions. None of this makes your project unlawful — it means the documentary answer must be airtight before you present it.

There is also a background commercial obligation worth knowing. Article L. 123-24 of the Code de commerce states that every trader is required to have an account opened in a credit institution or in a postal cheque office. Your French company must therefore hold an account; the system cannot leave you with none. That is precisely the gap the statutory right to an account fills, as the second part of this guide shows. But before invoking it, you need the refusal itself to be documented correctly — which is the subject of the next section.

B. What the bank owes you when it says no: written reasons and the refusal certificate that unlocks the Banque de France

A silent or purely oral refusal is not a proper refusal. The statute organises what the bank must hand over, because that document is the key that opens the next door. For business accounts, the official service-public guidance for professionals states that where a bank refuses a professional deposit account, it must supply an attestation de refus (refusal certificate) within 15 days of the acknowledgement of receipt of the account request or of its hand delivery at the counter. That certificate must state the reason for the refusal — frozen banking status, financial situation, incomplete file, for example — and explain the recourse: the applicant may ask the Banque de France to designate a credit institution. Keep the dated proof of your request (receipt, bailiff’s report or email acknowledgements) so the 15-day clock is demonstrable.

The general statute says the same thing in broader terms. Article L. 312-1 of the Code monétaire et financier provides that where the chosen institution refuses to open an account for one of the persons entitled under that text, the credit institution which refused to open an account shall systematically, free of charge and without delay, provide the applicant with a certificate of refusal of account opening and inform him that he may ask the Banque de France to designate a credit institution to open an account for him. The same article adds that the refusing bank must, on paper free of charge — and on another durable medium where the applicant expressly requests it — give the reasons for the refusal, mentioning where relevant the designation procedure. Ask expressly, in writing, for both the certificate and the statement of reasons on a durable medium; an email counts, and it creates your evidence trail from abroad.

Two practical consequences follow. First, if the bank refuses to give you the certificate, note that refusal in writing (a second registered letter referring to the statutory duty) and file with the Banque de France anyway, attaching proof that you requested the account and received no usable answer: the Banque de France procedure also covers the bank that never replies, since service-public guidance confirms that proving the absence of a reply suffices. Second, read the stated reason with a lawyer’s eye before acting on it. A reason such as unverifiable beneficial owner — missing apostilled register extract tells you to fix the file and reapply, which is faster than any procedure. A reason such as no commercial interest or a bare form letter with no genuine justification tells you to trigger the designation procedure immediately, because the file is complete and only the bank’s commercial appetite is missing.

One warning at this stage: do not confuse the operating account with the capital deposit. The funds subscribed in cash must be deposited, with the list of subscribers and the sums paid by each, subject to deposit under conditions determined by decree of the Conseil d’Etat under Article L. 225-5 of the Code de commerce, applicable to the SAS through the reference in Article L. 227-1. The implementing rule, Article R. 22-10-6 of the Code de commerce, directs those funds — for the account of the company being formed and through the persons who received them — to the Caisse des dépôts et consignations (the public deposit institution), a notary (notaire), or a credit institution, and states that this deposit shall be made within eight days of receipt of the funds unless the funds were received by a credit institution or listed intermediary. In other words, a notary or the Caisse des dépôts can issue your deposit certificate (attestation de dépôt) without any bank operating account, and that certificate is what the company formation desk (guichet unique, run by the INPI) needs to register the company and obtain the Kbis — the official registration certificate issued by the court clerk’s office (greffe du tribunal de commerce). Founders who wait for a full operating account before depositing capital lose months for nothing: deposit the capital with a notary or the Caisse des dépôts, register, get the Kbis, then fight the operating-account battle with a registered company — a far stronger file.

Finally, record everything in both languages of your file: keep the French originals (attestation de refus, dated request, list of documents supplied) and your own English schedule of what was sent, when, and to whom. The Banque de France examiner and, if needed, the judge will work from the French documents; your English schedule keeps the foreign board and shareholders aligned while the procedure runs.

II. How a foreign owner forces a solution from abroad: Banque de France designation, minimum services and keeping the account alive

A. How the Banque de France designates a bank for your company: file, one-day designation and three-day opening

The core mechanism is straightforward and free. Article L. 312-1 III of the Code monétaire et financier provides that in the event of refusal by the chosen institution to open such an account for one of the persons mentioned in I, that person may refer the matter to the Banque de France so that it designates a credit institution located near its domicile or another place of its choice, taking into consideration the market shares of each institution concerned, within one business day of receipt of the required documents defined by order (arrêté). The first paragraph of the same article opens the right to any natural or legal person domiciled in France lacking such an account in France — and your French company, once formed with a French registered office (siège social), is exactly that: a legal person domiciled in France, whatever the nationality of its shareholders. The Banque de France’s own guidance confirms the procedure works even where the applicant is subject to a banking ban (interdit bancaire) or listed in Banque de France incident files, and more than 30,000 people used it in 2022 alone.

The designated institutions are required to offer the account holder basic banking services (services bancaires de base) whose content and pricing conditions are specified by decree, and shall open the deposit account within three business days of receipt of all the documents necessary for that purpose. Those basic services are listed by Article D. 312-5 of the Code monétaire et financier and they are operationally complete for a starting company: opening, maintaining and closing the account; one change of address per year; bank identity statements (relevés d’identité bancaire, RIB) on request; direct debit domiciliation; a monthly statement of transactions; cashing cheques and transfers; SEPA direct debits, SEPA interbank payment orders and SEPA transfers, executable at the counter or remotely; remote balance consultation; cash deposits and withdrawals at the counter or the institution’s cash machines; and a payment card suitable for online payments and cash withdrawals within the European Union. For a foreign-run company, the remote-consultation, remote-transfer and card elements matter most: insist that they are activated from day one, in writing, with login credentials sent to your verified address.

The management of that account is governed by a written agreement (convention de compte) on paper or another durable medium where the applicant consents. The general framework for account agreements appears in Article L. 312-1-1 of the Code monétaire et financier, which requires credit institutions to make their general and pricing conditions available to customers and the public. Read the convention before signing: check the pricing of transfers outside the euro area, the conditions for adding signatories (a second authorised person in France is often the single most useful operational step a foreign founder can take), and the notice periods for closure.

Filing from abroad is entirely feasible. The Banque de France accepts files online, at the counter of a Banque de France branch (succursale), or by post. Your file should contain: the refusal certificate (or proof of absence of reply), the company’s Kbis or, if the company is still being formed, the draft articles plus the capital deposit certificate, the identity documents of the legal representative and of each beneficial owner holding, directly or indirectly, more than 25 percent, the registered-office lease or domiciliation contract, and a cover letter in French expressly requesting designation (demande de désignation) and naming the preferred area — Paris, for example, where most foreign founders centralise. A Paris-based lawyer or accountant (expert-comptable) can file and receive correspondence under a written mandate (pouvoir), so nothing requires your physical presence. Expect designation within one business day of a complete file and opening within three business days of the designated bank receiving the complete supporting documents — those are statutory deadlines, not targets, and citing them in your follow-up letters concentrates minds.

Case law shows the designation has teeth. In a judgment of 21 December 2023 (RG 22/05426), the Versailles Court of Appeal recalled that Article L. 312-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code states the principle of the right to open a deposit account for any natural or legal person domiciled in France in the credit institution of its choice (CA Versailles, 21 December 2023, RG 22/05426, official text). In that case the bank designated by the Banque de France on 16 November 2017 had refused by letter of 15 December 2017, invoking an earlier account closed by its litigation department and a discrepancy in the applicant’s date of birth between documents. The first-instance court had found that the Crédit Agricole designated by the Banque de France to open an account in the name of Mr [E] had committed a fault (faute) by failing to do so within three business days of receipt of the supporting documents supplied by him, when it held all the documents needed to open a deposit account in its books in the name of Mr [E], awarding 2,000 euros in damages with a daily penalty (astreinte) to compel opening — and the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment in all its provisions. The lesson for a foreign company is direct: once the file is complete, the designated bank has three business days, and a court will treat delay as a fault costing damages plus a coercive penalty. Keep the dated proof of when the bank received your complete documents; that date starts the clock the judges will use.

B. How a foreign owner keeps the account and the company running: closure notice, Paris practice and the complete dossier

Getting the account opened is only half the battle; keeping it requires knowing the closure rules, because a bank that did not want your file may later try to end the relationship. The statute draws a sharp line between an ordinary account and an account opened under the designation procedure. For an ordinary deposit account held by a business, the general account-agreement rules of Article L. 312-1-1 apply, and the convention de compte sets the notice period — commonly 30 to 60 days — which the bank must respect. For an account carrying basic services opened under designation, Article L. 312-1 IV of the Code monétaire et financier forbids unilateral termination by the bank unless at least one of six exhaustively listed conditions is met: deliberate use of the account for operations the institution has reason to suspect of pursuing illegal purposes; inaccurate information supplied by the client; loss of the domicile or residence conditions; subsequent opening of a second deposit account in France giving access to basic services; repeated incivility toward staff; or an anti-money-laundering termination ground under Article L. 561-8. Any termination at the bank’s initiative must be sent by free paper letter, with reasons — unless reasons would harm national security or public order — with a copy for information to the Banque de France, and with a minimum two-month notice except in the illegal-purpose and false-information cases. The letter must also tell the client about the customer-relations department and mediation for disputes over the termination.

For professional accounts the official guidance adds a concrete figure: where a bank that opened an account under the right-to-an-account procedure wishes to close it, it must warn the business 45 days in advance, then inform the Banque de France with the reason for closure — after which the Banque de France designates another bank where appropriate and a new professional account is opened under the same procedure. And the courts enforce notice strictly against complainants too: in a judgment of 30 June 2022 (RG 19/18242), the Paris Court of Appeal noted that even though no notice period had been specified when the agreement was terminated, a notice period of 4 months had indeed been observed before the account was closed, and it dismissed the client’s claims for lack of proof that any transaction had been rejected or any charge unduly levied (CA Paris, 30 June 2022, RG 19/18242, official text). The same judgment quotes the operative shield for designated accounts: under the terms of Article L. 312-1 IV of the Monetary and Financial Code, the credit institution may not unilaterally terminate the deposit-account agreement carrying basic banking services, opened pursuant to III, unless at least one of the following conditions is met. Two lessons follow for the foreign owner: never leave the account dormant or unresponsive to compliance requests, because false or stale information is a lawful termination ground; and if a closure letter arrives, check immediately whether the notice period and the statement of reasons comply — a defective closure letter is itself actionable, and mediation plus a fresh Banque de France referral are your remedies.

Paris and Île-de-France practice deserves a specific note, since most foreign founders register there. The competent company court clerk is the greffe du tribunal de commerce de Paris for a Paris siège social, and filings run through the single company formation desk (guichet unique). The Kbis is issued from the trade and companies register (registre du commerce et des sociétés, RCS) held by that greffe. Publication of the incorporation notice runs in a legal gazette (journal d’annonces légales, JAL) of the department, and the company’s existence is announced in the official civil and commercial bulletin (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, BODACC). None of these steps requires a French operating bank account — the notary-held or Caisse des dépôts-held capital deposit certificate suffices. Practically, Paris-based compliance teams see foreign files daily and process apostilled documents faster than provincial branches; designating Paris as your preferred area in the Banque de France request therefore shortens verification. Keep a French correspondence address from day one — a domiciliation company (société de domiciliation) registered with the prefecture is enough — because every actor (greffe, Banque de France, designated bank, tax office) writes to the siège social, and unanswered mail is the most common silent cause of stalled files.

Assemble now the complete dossier that prevents the next refusal. For the company: Kbis less than three months old (or draft articles plus deposit certificate if forming), registered-office lease or domiciliation contract, legal-gazette publication certificate, and the register of beneficial owners (registre des bénéficiaires effectifs, RBE) filing receipt from the greffe — banks check it systematically. For each individual (representative and every beneficial owner above 25 percent): passport, proof of address less than three months old, and, where the person is foreign-resident, a certified translation. For the activity: two or three contracts, invoices or letters of intent showing real French business, plus the projected first-year accounts. Present this as a single indexed PDF in French with a one-page English cover note for your board. Where the bank asks for more, answer within days: Article L. 561-8, read above, lets the bank freeze everything while identification is incomplete, so speed of response is a legal strategy, not merely good manners.

Three mistakes account for most foreign-founder failures on this file. First, applying to five banks simultaneously with five different document sets: each triggers a separate compliance review, and inconsistencies between the sets (different addresses, different capital figures) generate suspicion. Apply to one bank with the complete file, get the written refusal, then trigger designation. Second, moving the share capital into France through unexplained personal transfers before the account exists: document the source of funds (sale of shares, intra-group loan, savings) with bank statements and translate them, because the first question after identification is the origin of funds (origine des fonds). Third, ignoring the URSSAF and tax registrations after the Kbis arrives: the company must register with URSSAF (the social-security collection body, Unions de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales) before hiring, and obtain a VAT number (numéro de TVA intracommunautaire) from the tax office (service des impôts des entreprises, SIE) before intra-EU trading. A company that cannot show its SIREN (the nine-digit national business identifier issued by INSEE at registration) and active tax status looks hollow to the next bank. Our formation walkthrough, which covers the bank account, the Kbis, VAT and the first hire in one sequence, is the companion to this guide: Setting Up a Company in France as a Foreign Founder: Bank Account, Kbis, VAT and Your First Hire.

Conclusion

A refused bank account is not the end of a French project; it is a procedural moment the statute anticipates and equips. The bank that cannot verify must refuse, under Article L. 561-8 — but the bank that refuses must document its refusal, and the Banque de France must then designate, within one business day, an institution that opens within three, with the full basic-services package of Article D. 312-5. The Versailles and Paris decisions quoted above prove both edges of the blade: delay by a designated bank is a compensable fault, and closure without proper notice fails. For the foreign owner, the winning sequence is therefore: deposit the capital with a notary or the Caisse des dépôts within the eight-day rule, register and obtain the Kbis, apply to one bank with a complete translated file, collect the written refusal, file for designation citing Paris, activate remote tools on day one, and answer every later compliance request within days. Run that sequence and the account ceases to be a barrier and becomes what it should be: plumbing.

Need a quick opinion on your case?

A refused account, a frozen capital deposit or a closure letter needs an answer within days, not weeks. Get a phone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page. We assist foreign founders in Paris and across Île-de-France, entirely in English.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
3 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.