For a foreign founder, the first annual accounts of a French company are governed by a sequence of dates rather than by the date printed on the company’s first Kbis. The Kbis is the official extract showing key registration information. The decisive dates are the date of incorporation, the first accounting year-end, the date on which the accounts are approved, and the date on which a complete filing is accepted by the commercial court registry, known in French as the greffe. A company formed in France may have to prepare accounts even when it has made no sale, opened no French bank account or remained dormant.

The answer also depends on the vehicle. A SAS is a simplified joint-stock company; a SASU is a one-shareholder SAS; a SARL is a private limited liability company; an EURL is a one-shareholder SARL; and an SA is a public limited company. A French subsidiary is not treated like a branch of a foreign company. This article explains the first-year calendar, the approval and filing process for a founder abroad, the separate corporate tax return, and the response to a rejected or late filing. It uses RCS for the Commercial and Companies Register, INPI for the French National Institute of Industrial Property, the Guichet unique for the one-stop business-formalities portal, RNE for the National Business Register and BODACC for the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements.

The practical conclusion is simple but form-sensitive: identify the first closing date in the articles, prepare the accounts for that period, apply the approval rule for the exact legal form and the articles, then file the correct documents through the Guichet unique or the competent greffe. The tax return on form 2065 is a separate deadline. A foreign founder should maintain one calendar for all of these events and retain evidence of every submission.

I. When are the first annual accounts and first tax return due in France?

A. How do the incorporation date and year-end determine the first accounts?

The first question is the date on which the first accounting period ends. The date is normally selected in the constitutional documents and is not necessarily 31 December. The official Service Public guidance on choosing an accounting year-end states that a company may choose the end of its accounting year freely, subject to the applicable rules. It also states that the first year may be shorter or longer than twelve months, up to twenty-four months. That flexibility can be useful for a company incorporated late in the year, but it must be coordinated with tax and corporate obligations.

For example, a French subsidiary incorporated on 15 September 2026 may close its first period on 31 December 2026. Its first accounts then cover a short period of roughly three and a half months. The same company may choose 31 December 2027 as its first closing date, creating a longer first period. The longer period does not mean that the company can postpone every compliance obligation indefinitely. For a company subject to French corporate income tax, the first balance sheet cannot be closed later than 31 December of the year following the year of creation, according to the updated answer published by impots.gouv.fr.

The accounting year-end must also be distinguished from the filing date. At year-end, the company closes its books, performs the necessary inventory work and prepares a balance sheet, an income statement and notes to the accounts. The balance sheet describes assets, liabilities and equity at the closing date. The income statement records income and expenses for the period. The notes explain material information needed to understand those statements. A company with no turnover may have simple accounts, but “simple” is not the same as “optional”.

The general accounting obligation is connected with Article L. 123-12 of the French Commercial Code, which requires a trader to record movements affecting its assets and liabilities and to carry out an inventory at least once every twelve months. For a French company, the accounting file should therefore capture formation expenses, capital contributions, shareholder loans, bank charges, professional fees, foreign exchange movements and any transactions with the foreign parent. Keeping an empty ledger because trading has not started can produce an incomplete first balance sheet.

There is a separate tax timing point for a company subject to impôt sur les sociétés, abbreviated IS, meaning French corporate income tax. The official tax answer says: La première déclaration de résultat à déposer concernera la période comprise entre la date de création et la date de clôture du premier bilan. It also says that a newly created company that does not close a balance sheet during its creation year does not have to file a results declaration for that same year. This does not cancel bookkeeping or corporate governance. It only explains why the first form 2065 may cover a longer period than the calendar year in which the company was incorporated.

Form 2065 is the annual French corporate income tax return. The ordinary deadline for a non-31 December year-end is the last day of the third month following the close, with an additional fifteen days for electronic filing, according to the official impots.gouv.fr page on results taxation. If the accounting year ends on 31 December, a different early-May rule applies. A foreign founder should have the accountant record the applicable tax deadline rather than copy the annual-accounts filing deadline into the tax calendar.

Consider a company incorporated on 15 September 2026 with a first closing on 31 December 2027. Its first IS return concerns the period from 15 September 2026 to 31 December 2027. The company does not file a first-year results return merely because 31 December 2026 passed without a balance sheet. It must still prepare accounting records for the entire period and plan for the tax return after the actual first closing. The fact that this is the first year does not remove the need to preserve invoices, bank statements, contracts and evidence of capital movements.

The approval calendar depends on the legal form. For a SARL, Article L. 223-26 provides that the managers’ inventory and annual accounts are submitted to the shareholders for approval within six months of the end of the accounting year, subject to a court extension. The current text is available on Légifrance, Article L. 223-26. For an EURL, Article L. 223-31 applies a specific one-shareholder mechanism and preserves the six-month approval period. The sole shareholder’s decision must still be documented and entered in the appropriate register.

A SASU follows a specific rule as well. Under Article L. 227-9 of the French Commercial Code, the president prepares or stops the relevant accounts and the sole shareholder approves them, where appropriate after the statutory auditor’s report, within six months of the closing date. If the individual sole shareholder is also the president, the signed inventory and accounts filed within the same period can, in the statutory circumstances, serve as approval. The company should still preserve the decision and the evidence of filing.

A multi-shareholder SAS requires more care. Article L. 227-1 excludes several provisions applicable to sociétés anonymes, including Article L. 225-100, subject to the special rules of the SAS chapter. The articles of association determine the collective decisions and their procedure. The Criminal Chamber of the Cour de cassation, 7 January 2026, no. 24-83.864, held that the six-month approval rule for an SA cannot automatically be used to establish the offence of non-establishment of accounts by a multi-shareholder SAS. The Court explained that the analysis changes where the SAS has one shareholder or where its articles set an approval period. A founder should therefore read the articles before treating six months as a universal SAS rule.

That decision does not make a SAS’s accounts optional or give its president an open-ended period. The company remains required to prepare accounts at the end of its accounting year, follow its articles and file after approval where the filing obligation applies. The decision means that a legal analysis must identify the obligation allegedly breached: failure to establish accounts, failure to approve them, or failure to deposit approved accounts. Those are connected events, but they are not interchangeable.

For an SA, the ordinary general meeting is generally held within six months of the end of the accounting year under Article L. 225-100. A foreign group using an SA should add the meeting deadline, the date for dispatching the documents to shareholders, the statutory auditor timetable and the filing deadline to the same control sheet. For a subsidiary, the parent company’s global reporting calendar may be earlier, but it cannot replace the French company’s own statutory calendar.

Once the accounts have been approved, the filing period is normally one month for a paper filing and two months for an electronic filing. For a SARL or EURL, Article L. 232-22 requires the accounts and the result-allocation documents to be deposited within that timetable. For a company by shares, Article L. 232-23 imposes the corresponding filing obligation on a SAS, SASU or SA, subject to the documents and exceptions specified in the provision. The regulatory summary in Article R. 123-111 states: Les sociétés commerciales sont tenues de déposer, dans le délai d’un mois à compter de leur approbation par l’assemblée ordinaire, and extends that period to two months for electronic filing.

The dates can be illustrated without pretending that every company has the same timetable. A SARL closing on 31 December 2027 must ordinarily have its accounts approved by 30 June 2028. If approval takes place on 30 June and the electronic filing is validly completed on 20 August, the filing falls within the two-month period after approval. A paper filing would have to be completed within one month. For a multi-shareholder SAS, first check the articles and the actual approval date before applying that example. For a SASU or SARL, apply the statutory six-month approval rule unless a lawful court extension changes the timetable.

A branch must be placed on a different line in the calendar. A branch is not a new French legal person; its foreign head office remains the company. Under Article R. 123-112, a foreign commercial company opening a first establishment in France files its constitutional documents and, each year, the accounting documents it prepared, had audited and published in the state of its registered office. The French filing follows the deadline of the law governing the foreign head office. Documents may need a French translation, and copies may need certification by the person authorized to bind the company in France. This is not the same as preparing and approving the accounts of a French subsidiary.

The branch distinction matters to a founder deciding whether a parent-company reporting package is sufficient. If the French operation is a branch, the foreign company’s accounts may be the relevant documents under Article R. 123-112. If the operation is a French SAS, SASU, SARL or EURL, the French legal entity must prepare its own accounts and follow the French approval and filing rules. A Kbis or registration extract may identify the establishment, but it does not answer the legal-form question by itself. Check the entity name, registration number and type shown in the company file.

B. What does a foreign founder need to approve and file remotely?

The first remote task is not uploading a PDF. It is assembling a decision-ready package. For a French company, that package normally starts with the annual accounts: balance sheet, income statement and notes. It then includes the result-allocation proposal and the resolution or decision that approves the accounts and records what happens to the profit or loss. Depending on the company’s size, legal form and circumstances, the package may also include a management report, a statutory auditor’s report, consolidated accounts or a group-management report.

Article L. 232-22 expressly refers to the accounts, the proposal for allocation of the result and the resolution or decision on that allocation for a SARL or EURL. Article L. 232-23 describes the documents for companies by shares and addresses the case where the accounts are not approved. If approval is refused, the company does not solve the issue by silently filing a later approved version as if no refusal had occurred. The refusal decision must be analysed and, where required, deposited within the relevant timetable.

The INPI’s official annual-accounts filing service explains that the Guichet unique transmits the filing to the competent greffe. Since 1 January 2023, the online route has been the standard channel. After validation, information is transmitted to the RNE and published on DATA INPI; the greffe also publishes the relevant information in the BODACC. This is why a foreign founder should keep both the portal receipt and the later acceptance or rejection notice. “Submitted” and “accepted” are not necessarily the same status.

At the beginning of the process, the declarant must identify whether the filing concerns accounts of a company or a group and whether it is an initial or rectifying deposit. An initial deposit supplies the accounts and corporate documents for a period not previously accepted. A rectifying deposit corrects or completes a previous filing. Choosing the wrong option can make the history difficult to read, particularly where a filing was rejected for an incorrect company identifier, missing decision, invalid signature or incomplete attachment.

The signature route is a frequent obstacle for a founder who lives outside France. INPI explains that the signatory must be a natural person, such as the legal representative or a duly appointed mandataire. A mandataire is a person authorized to act for the company in the formalities process. The electronic route may require an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate, or FranceConnect+ authentication where the person signing can use that service. A foreign founder who cannot use the required identity system should arrange a written mandate for a French accountant or lawyer before the filing deadline.

The mandate should identify the company, the exact financial years, the authority to submit an initial or rectifying filing, the authority to answer a rejection, and the authority to send proof of regularization to the court if a judicial procedure is pending. A short email saying “please handle the accounts” may not be enough to resolve a court notice. Keep the signed mandate, the identity document or corporate authorization used by the mandataire, and the final submission receipt in the company’s permanent file.

Remote approval must also follow the company’s articles and the legal form. For a one-shareholder company, the sole shareholder records a written decision. For a multi-shareholder company, the shareholders must use the meeting, written consultation or electronic process permitted by the articles and the applicable provisions. The minutes should identify the financial year, the accounts placed before the shareholders, the result allocation, the vote or decision, and the date. If a proxy is used, the proxy should identify the shareholder, the meeting or decision, and the scope of the authority.

Time-zone problems should be addressed before the date of approval. A shareholder in New York, Singapore or London may receive the documents on a local date different from the French company’s date. The corporate file should use one consistent date and time standard, and the minutes should state when the decision was adopted under the company’s rules. Where a foreign parent must approve a related-party transaction or a capital support arrangement, that group approval should be kept alongside, but not confused with, the French company’s annual-accounts decision.

Translation requires the same discipline. A foreign-language power of attorney, shareholder resolution or parent-company certificate may need a French translation for the filing or for communication with the greffe. The translation should not alter the company name, registration number, dates or amounts. Preserve the original and the translation. Do not replace the French subsidiary’s accounts with the parent’s consolidated accounts merely because the consolidated report is already available in English.

Confidentiality is a filing option, not a non-filing option. Article L. 232-25 allows eligible micro-enterprises to declare that their annual accounts will not be made public and allows certain eligible small or medium-sized companies to request limited publication under the conditions stated in the Code. The company must attach the appropriate declaration at the time of filing and verify that it falls within the relevant legal category. A foreign parent’s preference for privacy does not itself create eligibility.

Before the founder signs, run a short control list:

• confirm the exact French legal entity, registration number and accounting period;
• confirm that the first closing date is consistent with the articles and the tax record;
• confirm whether the entity is a French subsidiary, a branch or another form;
• confirm the approval rule for a SAS, SASU, SARL, EURL or SA;
• confirm the result-allocation decision and the authority of every signatory;
• confirm whether the deposit is initial or rectifying;
• confirm whether a confidentiality declaration is available and correctly attached;
• save the filing receipt, the portal reference and every rejection message.

The firm’s French company formation and corporate-structuring page provides the broader context for choosing and maintaining a French entity. For the recurring compliance cycle, a foreign founder may also use the firm’s French company legal calendar. The present article addresses the narrower first-year question: how to identify the first closing, approval and filing sequence without confusing it with a branch’s or a parent company’s obligations.

II. What should a foreign founder do when the first deadline is missed or unclear?

A. How can the company correct a late or incomplete first filing?

A late or unclear first filing should be diagnosed chronologically. Start with the incorporation documents, the Kbis or RCS extract, the articles, the tax registration information and the accounting engagement letter. Then create one row for each accounting period: incorporation date, closing date, accounts-preparation date, approval date, filing date, filing type, portal reference, result and outstanding document. If the company has a letter from the greffe or a court order, add the notification date, the deadline stated in the document and any daily astreinte. An astreinte is a coercive payment fixed by a court to encourage compliance.

The first diagnostic question is whether a period actually closed. A company formed in November may not have a balance sheet at 31 December if its first period validly runs to the following year-end. The tax rule described above must nevertheless be checked, and the company should be able to show the closing date selected in its documents. The second question is whether the accounts were approved. A filing deadline normally runs after approval, not merely after incorporation. The third question is whether a SAS’s articles set a special approval period. The fourth question is whether the uploaded file was rejected rather than accepted.

Once the facts are mapped, obtain or complete the accounts for the earliest outstanding period. The absence of invoices does not eliminate capital, bank, formation-cost, tax or shareholder-loan entries. If the parent advanced funds, the accounting file should identify the nature and terms of the advance. If the company had no bank account, the accounts should still reconcile capital and expenses. A foreign group ledger can be a starting point, but the final file must identify the French company and comply with the applicable French presentation and filing requirements.

Next, hold or document the required approval decision. For a SARL, EURL, SASU or SA, the six-month rule and any court extension should be checked. For a multi-shareholder SAS, review the articles and the actual decision-making process in light of the 2026 Cour de cassation decision. If the original meeting was defective, obtain advice on whether a new approval, a ratification or a rectifying filing is required. Do not backdate minutes to make the calendar look clean. The file should explain the actual sequence and the steps taken to cure it.

Then file through the Guichet unique using the correct filing type. If no filing for the period has been accepted, the submission is normally treated as an initial deposit. If a previous submission was accepted but contained an error, examine whether a rectifying deposit is available. The INPI instructions distinguish initial and rectifying deposits and explain that the documents required can vary with the legal form. Follow the rejection message line by line and use the same company identifier and period throughout the corrected file.

After a late filing, keep evidence that can be sent to the greffe or the court: portal acknowledgement, timestamp, uploaded documents, payment reference if applicable, acceptance notice and the public record after processing. A screenshot alone may not prove that the file was accepted. Ask the mandataire for the official receipt and for confirmation of the status shown in the portal. If the filing is rejected again, preserve the second reason instead of overwriting the first file. This creates a record showing diligence and allows the next correction to address the actual defect.

The consequences of delay include more than a filing inconvenience. A bank may ask for the latest accounts before opening or maintaining a corporate account. A lender or investor may treat a missing first filing as a governance risk. A customer may hesitate to sign with a company whose public record appears incomplete. A parent company may also need the French entity’s accepted accounts before completing group reporting. Prompt regularization can therefore protect financing and commercial credibility even when the company has not yet received a judicial letter.

The company should also test the tax position separately. If the first 2065 return is late, it is not cured merely by filing the annual accounts. If VAT returns, employer declarations or local business tax registrations are involved, those matters belong in a separate workstream. The first annual-accounts article should not become a substitute for a complete tax review. The founder should ask the accountant to reconcile the accounting closing date, the tax period, the form 2065 deadline and any tax payments due.

Where the first filing remains incomplete because the founder cannot sign through the French portal, appoint a mandataire with a clear mandate. Where the issue is a rejected translation, replace the translation and retain both versions. Where the issue is a missing resolution, prepare the proper decision and verify whether a rectifying filing is needed. Where the issue is a disputed deadline, write a short legal chronology with the exact articles, dates and documents. A precise chronology is more useful than a general explanation that the founder was abroad.

The company should not rely on confidentiality to hide a missed filing. Under Article L. 232-25, confidentiality is requested through the filing and is limited to companies and documents meeting the statutory conditions. If the company is eligible, attach the declaration. If it is not eligible, file the documents required by law. An incomplete filing accompanied by an informal request for privacy can lead to a rejection and a longer delay.

A branch requires a different correction plan. Identify the home-state filing deadline under Article R. 123-112, obtain the foreign parent’s approved and published accounts, prepare any French translation and certification, and submit the documents for the French establishment. Do not file a French subsidiary’s local accounts as a substitute for the branch documents, or vice versa. The greffe needs to see the legal perimeter clearly. The Kbis, the foreign parent’s registration evidence and the French establishment details should be checked together.

B. When can the commercial court involve the director personally?

The first stage may be a reminder or an administrative rejection, but a court procedure can follow. Article L. 232-24 of the French Commercial Code states: Le greffier, lorsqu’il constate l’inexécution du dépôt prévu au I des articles L. 232-21 à L. 232-23, informs the president of the commercial court so that the court can consider the statutory measures. This provision is one reason a company should respond to the first letter and not wait for a formal summons.

Under Article L. 123-5-1, a person with an interest or the public prosecutor may ask the president of the court, sitting in urgent proceedings, to order the legal representative to complete the filing under an astreinte. The provision begins: A la demande de tout intéressé ou du ministère public, le président du tribunal, statuant en référé. It also allows the president, in the same circumstances, to appoint a mandataire to carry out the formalities. An order is a judicial act and must be treated differently from an informal registry reminder.

Article L. 611-2, II addresses a commercial company whose directors have not deposited the annual accounts within the applicable deadlines. It permits the president of the court to address an order to the directors to file quickly and under an astreinte. The statutory wording refers to leur adresser une injonction de le faire à bref délai sous astreinte. The foreign director should identify whether the document is a simple reminder, an order under the publicity rules or a prevention procedure. Each requires a different response and evidence package.

Article R. 611-13 provides that the court order gives the legal representative one month from notification or service to deposit the accounts, under the threat of an astreinte. It also fixes the rate and identifies the hearing. The order is not something that can be answered by sending an explanation to the accountant alone. The company should file the accounts, communicate the receipt to the relevant registry and obtain legal advice immediately if the deadline or the scope of the order is disputed.

Notification must be tracked. Article R. 611-14 deals with notification of the order by the clerk and the consequences of an unclaimed or unsuccessful delivery. A foreign director should not assume that living outside France prevents service or suspends the deadline. Check the registered office address, the address used by the company in the RCS, the email notices and the person authorized to receive documents. If the company moved offices without updating its registration, that corporate defect may have contributed to the missed response and should be regularized separately.

If the order is complied with within the stated period, Article R. 611-15 provides that the matter is removed from the list by the president of the court. If the order is not complied with, the clerk records the non-filing by official report. The company should therefore send proof of actual filing rather than only a promise to file. The receipt, acceptance notice and any corrected filing should be matched to the years named in the order.

Under Article R. 611-16, the president of the court decides on liquidation of the astreinte if the order is not complied with. The amount of the condemnation is paid to the French Treasury. An astreinte is therefore not automatically erased by filing after the deadline. The court must decide what amount, if any, is due under the order. A company that has filed late should still regularize promptly and then address the liquidation procedure with evidence of the date of compliance, the reasons for delay and any procedural issue.

The Cour de cassation has made the personal risk clear. In Commercial Chamber, 7 May 2019, no. 17-21.047, the Court held that when the representative fails to comply with an injunction to deposit annual accounts and the astreinte is liquidated, the representative can be ordered personally to pay that amount. The official summary identifies the rule as a condamnation à titre personnel du représentant légal de la personne morale. A foreign director cannot assume that the company’s separate legal personality automatically absorbs a personal astreinte imposed for ignoring a court order.

An official decision indexed as Court of Appeal of Nîmes, RG no. 22/02410 shows how the mechanism can operate in practice. The case concerned an order requiring the legal representative to file accounts for several years within one month, under a daily astreinte. The decision refers to the report recording non-filing, the personal position of the representative and the court’s power to liquidate the astreinte. The practical lesson is that a company with several missing years should build a year-by-year regularization plan as soon as the first judicial notice arrives.

The 7 January 2026 decision, Criminal Chamber, no. 24-83.864, adds an important qualification for a multi-shareholder SAS. The Court held that, where the accounts had not been approved, the one-month period under Article L. 232-23 had not started to run. Its decision states: le délai d’un mois prévu par l’article L. 232-23 du code de commerce pour les déposer au greffe n’a pas commencé à courir. This is a point about the legal elements of the particular offence and the starting event; it is not permission to leave accounts unprepared. The director must still establish the accounts, follow the articles and obtain a valid approval decision where required.

The official Service Public page on annual-accounts filing states that non-filing can expose the company’s legal representative to a €1,500 criminal fine, increased to €3,000 in the event of a repeat offence. It also explains that the offence can be prosecuted for one year from the date on which the accounts should have been filed. Those figures do not replace a case-specific analysis. The legal form, the approval history, the exact filing date, the identity of the representative and the existence of an order all matter.

There is a difference between a criminal fine and an astreinte. The fine is a criminal sanction assessed under the relevant offence. The astreinte is a coercive mechanism ordered by the court to obtain performance; if the order is ignored, the court may liquidate it. A director who has just received a letter should therefore identify the source, legal basis, deadline, recipient and consequence stated in the letter. The response should contain the actual filing plan and evidence, not a generic statement that the company had no activity.

A foreign founder should also assess whether the missing accounts are a signal of wider financial difficulty. The absence of filing can cause the court president to examine the company’s economic and financial position. If the company cannot pay debts as they fall due, the director needs a solvency assessment and possibly a separate preventive or insolvency strategy. Filing the annual accounts is important, but it does not by itself resolve unpaid tax, social contributions, supplier debt or a shareholder dispute.

When communicating with the court or greffe, use a short indexed bundle. Put the court order or notice first, followed by the chronology, the completed accounts, the approval resolution, the filing receipt, the acceptance notice and any explanation of a rejection. Identify the exact years and state what remains outstanding. If an extension or correction is requested, give a date-specific plan and identify the person responsible for each step. An English summary can help a foreign founder, but the formal documents and any required translation must match the French record.

The best preventive control is to set the first-year calendar at incorporation. The company should record the first closing date, the applicable approval deadline, the filing deadline by method, the form 2065 date, the statutory auditor timetable if relevant, the person signing and the backup mandataire. It should schedule reminders before the deadline, not on the deadline. A parent company’s reporting date can be used as an earlier internal target. It should not be used as a substitute for checking the French statutory date.

Conclusion

For a French company established by a foreign founder, the first annual-accounts deadline begins with the first accounting period selected for the French entity. The next dates depend on the legal form: SARL, EURL, SASU and SA generally have a six-month approval framework, while a multi-shareholder SAS must be analysed through its articles and the special SAS rules. After approval, the accounts are filed within one month on paper or two months electronically under the applicable provisions. A branch follows a different regime based on the foreign head office’s accounts and home-state deadline.

The form 2065 corporate tax return is separate. A new company that does not close a balance sheet in its creation year may not have to file a results return for that year, but its first return will cover the period from creation to the first balance sheet, which cannot be postponed beyond 31 December of the following year. If the filing is late, the company should reconstruct the chronology, complete the oldest missing period, obtain the right approval, file through INPI and preserve proof. A court injunction requires a faster response: non-compliance can lead to a liquidated astreinte imposed personally on the legal representative.

These rules make the first-year calendar a governance document, not just an accountant’s reminder. It should show who approves, who signs, which entity is filing, which documents are attached and whether the portal has accepted them. A foreign founder who cannot complete the French electronic identity step should appoint a mandataire early and retain the mandate. That structure prevents the common error of confusing a parent company’s accounts, a branch filing, a French subsidiary’s annual accounts and the separate corporate tax return.

Need a quick opinion on your case

You can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review the incorporation date, first year-end, approval record, filing receipt and any letter from the greffe before advising on the next step.

+33 6 46 60 58 22 — Maître Reda Kohen

Contact the firm to send the key dates and documents securely.