Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Winter Fuel Payment Stopped in France After Brexit: How Can a British Pensioner Challenge the Decision?

If your Winter Fuel Payment has stopped after you moved from the United Kingdom to France, the first question is not whether your heating bill is high enough. It is which rule the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) applied, to which winter, and on which facts. For winter 2026 to 2027, the official guidance says that a person must usually live in England, Wales or Northern Ireland and must have been born on or before 27 June 1960. It also says that a person who usually lives outside those parts of the United Kingdom is not eligible. A British State Pension paid into a French bank account is a separate entitlement and does not, by itself, preserve Winter Fuel Payment.

That rule makes many older explanations about British pensioners abroad unsafe to rely on. A refusal may nevertheless be wrong if the DWP has confused a temporary stay with your usual residence, used the wrong qualifying week, failed to process a claim, or treated an income-recovery issue as a refusal. The correct response is a factual and legal challenge to the DWP, not an appeal to a French caisse primaire d’assurance maladie (CPAM), the primary French health-insurance fund. This guide sets out the current test, the evidence to gather, the mandatory reconsideration route, the tribunal stage, and the separate French consequences that may need their own procedure.

I. Why has my Winter Fuel Payment stopped after I moved to France?

A. Can a British pensioner living in France still qualify in winter 2026–2027?

For the 2026–2027 winter, start with the current GOV.UK eligibility page, not a page written when European Union social-security coordination operated differently. The published test has several elements:

  • you were born on or before 27 June 1960;
  • you usually live in England, Wales or Northern Ireland; and
  • you are not excluded by one of the specific circumstances concerning hospital treatment, prison or certain care-home situations.

The relevant qualifying week for winter 2026–2027 is 21 to 27 September 2026. The date is important, but it is not a magic solution for a person whose settled home is in France. Spending a few days in England during that week does not automatically change your usual residence. Conversely, a person who normally lives in England but was temporarily in France may have a factual argument if the DWP recorded the temporary absence as a permanent move. The decision must therefore be read against the chronology, not against the address printed on one isolated document.

The statutory background is also now clear. The explanatory memorandum for the Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment Regulations 2025 explains that the replacement scheme is paid to people ordinarily resident in England and Wales during the third full week of September and states that Winter Fuel Payments will not be made outside the United Kingdom. Northern Ireland operates its own arrangements, reflected in the current government guidance. A British citizen who is ordinarily resident in metropolitan France will usually fail the residence condition even if the person receives a UK State Pension, owns a property in England, keeps a UK bank account or pays UK tax on part of the pension.

This is also why an old article about “exportable” Winter Fuel Payment can be misleading. Under earlier arrangements, some people living in specified European countries could qualify if they satisfied additional conditions. France was in any event subject to historic temperature and country-list restrictions. The current 2025 regulations and 2026 guidance must be applied to the winter being claimed. A search result that describes a previous winter is not evidence of entitlement for 2026–2027.

The Brexit Withdrawal Agreement residence position should still be recorded, but it should not be confused with the Winter Fuel Payment test. A Withdrawal Agreement residence permit is the French document issued to a British national whose situation is protected by the agreement. The French government’s official guidance on health insurance for a foreign national settling in France confirms that the rules differ for a UK national and depend on the person’s status, while the government’s Brexit information explains that people settled in France before 31 December 2020 may retain acquired rights and benefit from specific coordination rules. That information can matter for healthcare, family benefits and other coordinated rights. It does not mean that the French permit itself creates an automatic right to a UK heating payment. If the DWP has failed to consider a protected factual situation, the permit and the date of establishment in France should be included in a reconsideration request; the legal effect must then be assessed against the exact benefit period and decision reason.

Keep the Winter Fuel Payment separate from other UK benefits. The current claim guidance lists State Pension, Pension Credit, Universal Credit, Attendance Allowance, Personal Independence Payment, Carer’s Allowance and other benefits as circumstances that may make automatic payment possible. That list concerns administration of the claim. It does not turn every listed benefit into an exception to the overseas residence rule. A British pensioner can continue to receive a State Pension in France and still be refused Winter Fuel Payment. Attendance Allowance or Personal Independence Payment may also have their own residence and exportation rules. The loss of one payment should not be treated as proof that all UK or French rights have ended.

There is a further geographical distinction. Scotland has replaced Winter Fuel Payment with Pension Age Winter Heating Payment, administered under a separate Scottish scheme. A person whose usual residence is in Scotland should use the Scottish route rather than argue that the England, Wales and Northern Ireland payment applies. A person resident in France is not made eligible by describing a French home as a Scottish or English “second base”. The DWP will look at ordinary residence, the benefit period and the information supporting the claim.

The practical conclusion is uncomfortable but important. If you genuinely moved your permanent home to France and remained ordinarily resident there throughout the relevant period, an appeal based only on British nationality, National Insurance contributions, a UK pension or colder weather in your French département (administrative area) is unlikely to succeed under the current published rule. A challenge is worthwhile when it identifies a real error: the move was temporary, the usual home remained in the United Kingdom, the DWP assessed the wrong winter, the claimant was in Northern Ireland rather than France during the relevant period, or the notice gives a reason that does not match the facts. That is the threshold between a legal challenge and a request for discretionary help that the DWP is not authorised to grant.

B. Is the problem residence, income, payment data or a change of circumstances?

Do not assume that every missing payment is an overseas-residence refusal. The wording of the letter determines the next step. Four different situations are commonly mixed together.

First, the DWP may say that you are not eligible because you usually live outside England, Wales or Northern Ireland. This is a substantive residence decision. Your evidence should address where your normal home was during the relevant qualifying week, whether the French stay was temporary, and whether the DWP has recorded a move date incorrectly. A French address in a DWP file is not conclusive if the address was used only for correspondence, but a French address combined with a settled life in France will be powerful evidence against entitlement. The facts must be stated honestly and consistently across the claim, tax records, residence documents and bank correspondence.

Secondly, you may have been eligible in principle but failed to make a claim. Most eligible people receive the payment automatically, but the official claim page says that a claim may be needed if you have never received Winter Fuel Payment or if you deferred your State Pension since the last payment. Claims for winter 2026–2027 open on 21 September 2026. If your letter is really a failure-to-claim or missing-data message, the immediate task is to contact the Winter Fuel Payment Centre and ask what claim or information is required. The current change-of-circumstances guidance gives the centre’s address and explains that a move, address change or care-home admission should be reported promptly. Keep a copy of every form and letter.

Thirdly, a payment may be made but later recovered because of personal income. For winter 2025–2026 and subsequent periods covered by the new rules, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) can recover a payment when the recipient’s total personal income is above £35,000. The HMRC recovery guidance says that the calculation can include the State Pension, occupational and personal pensions, employment earnings, savings interest, dividends, trust income, taxable benefits, net self-employed profits and net rental income. Only the recipient’s share of a joint source is counted. A partner’s income is not automatically added to the recipient’s figure.

This recovery is not the same as saying that a person failed the residence condition. HMRC may collect the full payment through a tax code or Self Assessment. The current guidance says that a person with income of £35,000 or less keeps the payment, while a person above the threshold repays it. If your bank statement shows no payment at all, or the decision letter says that you are ineligible because you live in France, challenging the tax charge will not correct the DWP residence record. If the issue is an incorrect income calculation, preserve the HMRC notice and use the tax route as well as any DWP route that applies.

Fourthly, the DWP may have recorded a change of circumstances without understanding its legal effect. A move from the United Kingdom to France, a return to the United Kingdom, a stay in hospital, admission to a care home, a change in a partner’s situation or deferred State Pension can all affect payment administration. The current eligibility page lists free hospital treatment for the whole qualifying week, imprisonment and certain care-home circumstances as exclusions. A short hospital stay or a short visit to France is not automatically the same as one of those exclusions. The dates must be checked against the exact wording of the decision.

The document set should therefore begin with the decision notice, not with a general bundle of proof. Mark the date on the notice, the winter or qualifying week mentioned, the reason given, the benefit office address, and whether it explains a reconsideration right. Then write a one-page timeline:

  • the date you left the United Kingdom, if you did;
  • the date you moved to or from France;
  • where your normal home was during 21–27 September 2026, or the qualifying week for an earlier winter;
  • periods spent in the United Kingdom and France, distinguishing visits from a settled move;
  • the date of any State Pension deferral, first claim or change report; and
  • the date and wording of every DWP or HMRC letter.

If the issue is a genuine French residence with no temporary absence, do not build a challenge around the cost of heating in France. The payment is governed by statutory eligibility, not by a comparison between French and British temperatures. Instead, ask whether another UK benefit, Pension Credit, a French energy measure or a local social-support scheme may apply. That alternative question is legally different from proving an entitlement to Winter Fuel Payment.

Your French legal status, healthcare registration and tax residence should also be reviewed separately. The French Social Security Code distinguishes healthcare entitlement from a UK cash benefit. Article L. 111-2-1 sets out the universal and solidarity-based structure of French health protection in the Code de la sécurité sociale. Article L. 111-2-3 leaves the assessment of stable residence and lawful stay to specific rules, as shown in the official text of Article L. 111-2-3. Those provisions do not restore Winter Fuel Payment, but they help prevent a mistaken conclusion that a DWP refusal automatically cancels French healthcare.

II. How can I challenge a stopped Winter Fuel Payment from France?

A. How do I ask the DWP for mandatory reconsideration and what evidence should I send?

The first formal step is usually a mandatory reconsideration. This is the DWP process in which the original decision is looked at again before an appeal can proceed. The official mandatory reconsideration guidance expressly includes Winter Fuel Payment and says that you usually have one month from the date of the decision. If you apply late, explain the reason immediately; the same guidance gives hospitalisation and bereavement as examples of circumstances that may justify a late request. Do not wait for a reply to an informal telephone call if the deadline is running.

Use the contact details on the decision letter. You can normally ask by telephone, in writing or with the relevant form. The DWP’s current CRMR1 and CRMR1A publication explains that the completed request and supporting evidence should be sent to the address at the top of the decision letter. If you live in France, send the request in a way that produces proof of delivery or a reliable electronic confirmation. A postal receipt proves dispatch, but the guidance says a written request must arrive within the time limit, so allow for international delivery.

The request should identify the decision precisely. A useful opening is:

  • the benefit: Winter Fuel Payment;
  • the winter and qualifying week concerned;
  • the date of the decision;
  • the exact part of the decision you dispute; and
  • the correction you ask the DWP to make.

Then put the grounds in numbered paragraphs. If the alleged error concerns residence, state where your usual home was and why. Do not simply say that you are British or that you paid National Insurance. Explain the factual status of the French stay: a holiday, a temporary family stay, a medical absence, a split arrangement, or a permanent move. If the DWP has used the wrong date, give the correct date and the document proving it. If you were living in England, Wales or Northern Ireland during the qualifying week but the DWP used an old French address, say so directly and ask it to reassess the qualifying-week condition.

If the issue concerns a missing claim, state when you first claimed, whether you had deferred your State Pension, and what automatic-payment information the DWP already held. If the issue concerns a hospital, care-home or prison exclusion, provide exact admission and discharge dates. If the decision concerns income or repayment, identify whether the notice came from DWP or HMRC and do not combine a residence argument with an unparticularised complaint about tax. A reconsideration officer can only correct the decision being challenged.

The evidence should prove the reason for the challenge. Depending on the facts, consider:

  • the complete DWP decision notice and any payment statement;
  • letters showing the address held by the DWP and the date any change was reported;
  • travel records, tenancy or occupation records and other documents showing whether France was a temporary destination or your settled home;
  • proof of the UK home actually occupied during the qualifying week, where that is the case;
  • the Withdrawal Agreement residence permit and evidence of the date you established residence in France, if you rely on a protected pre-2021 situation;
  • State Pension deferral or award correspondence;
  • hospital, care-home or custody dates where an exclusion is disputed; and
  • the HMRC income calculation, tax-code notice and documents showing the correct personal income, if the dispute is about recovery.

There is no advantage in sending every bank statement or every travel receipt without an explanation. The DWP guidance says that evidence should support why the decision is wrong. Arrange the documents in the same order as the numbered grounds, redact irrelevant account numbers and explain any French-language document in clear English. Keep the originals and a complete copy of what was sent. If an authorised representative or appointee is involved, identify that person and include evidence of the authority already recognised by the DWP.

A strong request asks for a decision, not merely “help”. The final paragraph can ask the DWP to revise the decision, restore the payment for the correct winter if the legal conditions are met, and issue a written explanation if it maintains the refusal. It should also ask the DWP to identify the residence date, qualifying week and regulation relied upon. That makes it easier to see whether the dispute is factual or legal.

There are limits to the argument. If your permanent home was in France throughout the relevant week and the DWP has applied the current overseas-residence rule correctly, the mandatory reconsideration is unlikely to create an exception. An honest application can still ask the DWP to correct an inaccurate date or explain an inconsistent notice, but it should not present a French winter, a British passport or a UK pension as a legal exemption. A solicitor can assess a genuinely protected Withdrawal Agreement or coordination issue when the facts are unusual, but the documents and dates must come first.

B. What happens after mandatory reconsideration, and what is the French route for a separate CPAM decision?

The DWP should send a mandatory reconsideration notice explaining whether the original decision has changed and what evidence was considered. If the result remains adverse, the next route is normally an appeal to the independent Social Security and Child Support Tribunal. The official guidance says that you must wait for the mandatory reconsideration notice before appealing, and the DWP appeal material generally gives one calendar month from that notice. Follow the instructions printed on your notice, use the current His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) social-security and child-support forms, and attach the notice. If your appeal is late, explain the reason and ask for the late appeal to be admitted; do not assume that a late appeal will be accepted.

The tribunal stage is about the legal and factual entitlement to the UK benefit. It is not a French administrative appeal. A French prefecture, CPAM or caisse d’allocations familiales (CAF, the French family-benefits fund) cannot overturn a DWP Winter Fuel Payment decision. A complaint about poor DWP service is also different from an appeal. A complaint may address delay, lost correspondence or inaccessible communication, but it does not replace the reconsideration deadline and does not, by itself, create entitlement.

The distinction matters because the end of Winter Fuel Payment may expose a different problem in France. A British pensioner may simultaneously need to establish healthcare coverage, register a UK S1 form, address a contribution notice, or challenge a refusal by a French body. The French government’s Brexit portal confirms that the position can depend on whether the person was settled in France before 31 December 2020, which state is competent and whether a pension or employment relationship creates a coordination link. The French procedure must be built from the French decision, not copied from the DWP form.

For healthcare, Article L. 160-1 of the French Social Security Code says that a person working in France or, without professional activity, residing there in a stable and lawful manner can receive healthcare cost coverage under the Code. The current Article L. 160-1 text is therefore relevant when a French body treats a British resident as uninsured, but it does not decide whether the UK pays Winter Fuel Payment. For an inactive resident, Article L. 160-1-1 addresses healthcare coverage subject to a financial participation in the situations covered by that provision; read the official Article L. 160-1-1 before assuming that a payment refusal has changed your French affiliation.

Article L. 160-6 is particularly important for a pensioner with an international link. It lists circumstances in which Article L. 160-1 does not apply, including certain holders of a foreign pension whose healthcare is, under an international agreement or European regulation, the responsibility of the foreign scheme paying the pension. The official Article L. 160-6 must be read with the applicable UK–France coordination rules and the person’s S1 or other evidence. The fact that a UK heating payment stops does not itself prove that the UK remains, or ceases to be, the competent healthcare state.

The benefits being discussed are also different in legal nature. Article L. 160-8 describes the healthcare services covered by French social protection, including medical care, medicines and hospital treatment. See the official Article L. 160-8. A Winter Fuel Payment is a UK cash benefit aimed at winter heating costs. It is not a French healthcare benefit and is not a substitute for an S1 registration or French health-insurance affiliation.

If a French social-security body sends a refusal, recovery notice or affiliation decision, do not send it to the DWP. Article L. 142-1 defines the scope of French social-security litigation, including disputes about the application of social-security legislation; the official Article L. 142-1 reference is the starting point for identifying the competent dispute route. Article L. 142-4 provides that contentious proceedings in the matters covered by the relevant provisions are preceded by a prior appeal in the conditions set by regulation; consult the official Article L. 142-4 before filing in court.

The French prior appeal is commonly handled by a commission de recours amiable (CRA), meaning an amicable appeals commission inside the relevant social-security organisation. Article R. 142-1 describes that commission for claims against decisions of French social-security organisations; its official text should be read with the remedy notice on your decision. The CRA route is not the DWP’s mandatory reconsideration. Filing one does not suspend the UK one-month limit, and asking the DWP for mandatory reconsideration does not preserve a French deadline.

French administrative decisions can also raise a reasoning issue. Article L. 211-2 of the Code des relations entre le public et l’administration recognises a right to be informed of the reasons for certain individual adverse decisions, including refusal of an advantage when the statutory conditions are met; see the official Article L. 211-2. Article L. 211-5 requires the reasons covered by that chapter to be written and to state the legal and factual considerations supporting the decision; see the official Article L. 211-5. These provisions may help analyse an inadequately explained French refusal, but they do not impose French reasoning rules on the DWP’s British benefit decision.

Before any UK tribunal appeal or French CRA challenge, make a two-column file:

  • United Kingdom: DWP decision, Winter Fuel Payment period, residence, qualifying week, claim history, mandatory reconsideration deadline and HMCTS route.
  • France: residence permit, healthcare basis, S1 or pension evidence, CPAM or other French decision, CRA deadline, tax residence and any separate social contributions.

This prevents a common procedural error: sending a French residence card to the wrong authority and believing that it proves a UK benefit entitlement. It also stops a person from missing a French deadline while waiting for a DWP reply. If your French healthcare decision is based on a foreign pension, obtain the written legal basis and ask the relevant body to identify whether it treats the UK as the competent state. If a French notice is silent or contradictory, preserve the envelope, the date received and the appeal instructions before seeking a review.

The evidence should be translated into a coherent chronology rather than divided into two unrelated stories. For example, a British pensioner who moved permanently to France in 2022 may have no strong Winter Fuel Payment challenge for 2026–2027, but may have a separate argument about continued healthcare coordination, an S1 registration or the reasoning of a CPAM decision. A pensioner who was only visiting France during the qualifying week may have a DWP residence challenge even if the French healthcare issue is straightforward. The same person can have one claim that fails and another that succeeds.

For tax questions, keep the UK benefit file separate from French tax advice. The place where Winter Fuel Payment is administered is not the same as tax residence, and the £35,000 UK recovery threshold is not a French income-tax threshold. If your wider question concerns a UK pension, treaty classification or a French declaration, review it alongside this related UK–France tax guide, but do not use a tax conclusion as a substitute for proving ordinary residence to the DWP.

Finally, check payment timing without giving away your appeal rights. The current payment guidance says that most eligible people are paid in November or December and that, for winter 2026–2027, a person who has not received a letter or payment by 27 January 2027 should contact the Winter Fuel Payment Centre. If you are challenging an earlier decision, use the deadline on that decision now; waiting for the normal payment month may make the evidence harder to collect. If you are asked for personal information by text message or an unsolicited email, use the official GOV.UK pages rather than a link in the message. A DWP or HMRC appeal should never require you to disclose passwords or send bank credentials to an unknown address.

Conclusion

A Winter Fuel Payment stopped after a move to France is usually a question of ordinary residence, the qualifying week, the claim history or the reason given by the DWP. For winter 2026–2027, the published rule is restrictive: a person must usually live in England, Wales or Northern Ireland, subject to the scheme’s detailed conditions. A UK passport, National Insurance record, State Pension or French winter temperature is not, by itself, an exception. A person permanently resident in France may therefore have no viable entitlement challenge, while a person whose temporary absence, return to the United Kingdom, claim or payment data was recorded incorrectly may have a strong one.

Act quickly. Preserve the decision notice, calculate the one-month mandatory reconsideration period, send a focused factual chronology to the DWP office named in the notice, and keep proof of delivery. If the reconsideration remains adverse, follow the notice to the independent tribunal within its time limit. At the same time, treat French healthcare, S1, CPAM, CAF, tax and residence questions as separate legal files. French Social Security Code provisions can guide a French appeal, but they do not replace the British DWP route. The best case is built from the exact decision, the correct winter and documents that prove the disputed fact.

Need a quick opinion on your case

If your Winter Fuel Payment has stopped after moving between the UK and France, a lawyer can review the decision, the qualifying-week facts and the evidence before the deadline expires.

We offer a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 (Maître Reda Kohen), or use the contact form.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.