A foreign founder can complete the incorporation of a French company, receive its Kbis, and still find that a bank refuses to open the operating account needed for invoices, payroll and tax payments. This sequence is particularly frustrating when the founder is abroad, the shareholder is a foreign company, or the bank asks for documents that do not exist in the founder’s home legal system. The refusal does not automatically end the project. It changes the immediate task: the company must preserve evidence of the refusal, assemble a file that identifies the company and its ownership chain, and consider the statutory right-to-account procedure.

The relevant right belongs to the French company, not to the foreign founder personally. A registered company is a legal person separate from its shareholders, and a company domiciled in France may fall within the protection of Article L. 312-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code when it has no deposit account in France. The procedure does not guarantee a preferred bank, an overdraft, a credit facility or every payment product. It can, however, lead to the designation of a credit institution that must provide the statutory basic banking services, subject to identification and anti-money-laundering checks.

This article addresses the precise problem of a company already registered in France whose ordinary bank application has been refused. It explains what the Kbis proves, how to request a written refusal, how the Banque de France procedure works, what documents a foreign-owned company should prepare, how the fifteen-day silence rule operates, and what the designated bank may still ask for. The legal sources are linked inline, and the practical sequence is designed for a founder who needs an auditable path rather than a second round of informal applications.

I. What should a foreign founder do when a French company bank account is refused after the Kbis?

A. Is the company entitled to a bank account once it is registered in France?

The first question is not whether a foreign shareholder has a personal right to a French bank account. It is whether the French company is a legal person domiciled in France and whether it is without a deposit account in France. That distinction controls the procedure. A company may be owned by a United States corporation, a British parent, a Swiss investor or an individual who has never lived in France. Those facts can make the bank’s due-diligence review longer, but they do not by themselves remove the French company from the legal analysis.

Article 1842 of the French Civil Code provides that companies, with the statutory exceptions stated in that article, “jouissent de la personnalité morale à compter de leur immatriculation”. In practical terms, registration is the point at which the company becomes the separate legal person that can contract, hold assets and apply for an account in its own name. The Kbis is the official extract that normally demonstrates this registration and identifies the company name, legal form, registered office, registration number and management details. It is not a personal residence permit for the founder and it does not prove that the founder is tax resident in France.

The company’s registration route also explains why a bank may ask for several names for what appears to be the same record. The RCS, or Registre du commerce et des sociétés, is the Commercial and Companies Register. The RNE, or Registre national des entreprises, is the National Business Register. The INPI, the Institut national de la propriété industrielle, operates the national formalities channel through which many company filings are submitted. The greffe is the registry office attached to the competent commercial court. A bank may ask for a recent Kbis, an RNE extract, or evidence obtained through the INPI formalities process. The founder should send the exact current document and explain any difference in terminology rather than allowing a document mismatch to look like an ownership inconsistency.

Article L. 312-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code states that “Toute personne physique ou morale domiciliée en France” has a right to open a deposit account, provided that it does not already have such an account in France. The provision is therefore useful to a French company even when its director and shareholders are abroad. The company must be the applicant. A director, lawyer or authorised representative can carry out the steps, but the documents and the refusal evidence should identify the French legal entity as the customer.

That right should not be confused with an unconditional right to an ordinary commercial relationship with any bank. An ordinary bank may decline an application in accordance with its internal risk policy, provided it follows the rules applicable to the refusal. The right-to-account route is the statutory mechanism that follows. It is also different from the temporary account used to receive share capital before incorporation. A capital-deposit arrangement may be converted, closed or treated differently by the bank after registration. The company should disclose the status of that account accurately and should not claim that it has no account without checking whether the bank considers a capital or operating account to remain open.

The correct question is therefore: “Does the company currently have a deposit account in France, and can it prove that the bank refused its application?” If the answer is no account and yes refusal, the company has a factual basis for examining the procedure. If an account remains open, the right-to-account condition may not be met, even if the account is unusable, restricted or commercially inadequate. In that situation, the company should obtain written clarification from the bank about whether the account is open, closed, blocked, or merely awaiting additional information.

The official government explanation of the procedure is available on the Service-Public page on the right to a professional bank account. It is addressed to practical users, but the legal foundation remains Article L. 312-1 and its implementing provisions. A foreign founder should read the administrative guidance together with the Code because the important deadlines depend on the date the bank receives a complete request and on the date the Banque de France receives the designation file. The wider French business-law hub for foreign founders can be used to place this banking question within the company’s broader registration and compliance work.

A refusal after the Kbis also has a commercial consequence. Until an operating account exists, the company may be unable to collect customer payments, pay a French supplier by transfer, set up direct debits, run payroll or settle tax liabilities from a French account. The founder should not wait for an informal promise that “compliance will come back to you.” The next step is a dated evidence file. That file protects the company’s position and makes it possible to identify whether the difficulty is an ordinary risk decision, an incomplete file, a beneficial-owner problem, a sanctions concern, or a technical problem with the registration documents.

A useful internal distinction is the following:

• registration proves that the French company exists as a separate legal person;
• the refusal letter proves that a chosen credit institution declined the account request;
• the Banque de France designation starts the statutory pathway to a designated institution;
• the anti-money-laundering file allows the designated institution to identify the company, its representative and its beneficial owners;
• the basic-services account is not a promise of credit, overdraft or a full premium banking package.

This sequence avoids a common mistake: sending the founder’s passport repeatedly while leaving the company’s refusal evidence and ownership chart incomplete. The bank is not being asked to open the founder’s personal account. It is being asked to establish a relationship with a French company whose economic ownership may pass through one or more foreign entities. The application must be built around that legal person.

B. Which refusal evidence and documents should the company assemble?

The refusal should be converted into a document that can be used by the company and, where necessary, by the Banque de France. A telephone call, an online status message or a sales email saying that the bank cannot proceed may help explain the history, but it is weaker than a formal attestation issued in the company’s name. Article L. 312-1 requires the refusing credit institution to provide the attestation of refusal free of charge and without delay. Ask for the company’s exact legal name, registration number, registered office and the date of the refusal to appear consistently.

If the bank has not issued a clear written refusal, send a short written request through a traceable channel. State that the company is requesting either the opening of the deposit account or a written refusal attestation. Attach the Kbis and the authority of the signatory. Keep the submission, attachments, acknowledgement of receipt and all follow-up messages in a single chronological PDF. The objective is not to argue with the bank about its commercial decision at this stage. The objective is to establish the date on which the bank received a complete application and to obtain the document required for the next step.

The implementing rule is specific about silence. Article R. 312-6-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code treats “le silence gardé par un établissement de crédit pendant un délai de quinze jours” as a refusal in the circumstances described by the text. The fifteen-day period is not a general invitation to send repeated applications to different departments. It is an evidential clock attached to a request received by the institution. Preserve the acknowledgement of receipt or proof of hand delivery; without it, the company may struggle to prove when the period began.

The foreign-founder file should be organised in layers. The first layer is the French company itself:

• a recent Kbis or equivalent official registration extract;
• the articles of association and any current amendments;
• the company’s registration number, registered office evidence and business purpose;
• the appointment document for the president, managing director or other legal representative;
• the latest beneficial-owner filing and any confirmation that a change has been submitted.

The second layer identifies the people who can act for the company. Provide a clear copy of the director’s passport or national identity document, proof of address where requested, and the document showing the director’s powers. If a lawyer, accountant or incorporation agent communicates with the bank, include a dated power of attorney that identifies the company, the authorised tasks and the term of the mandate. A document signed by a shareholder is not automatically proof that the person can bind the company. The bank must know whether it is dealing with the legal representative, a delegated signatory or an external agent.

The third layer explains the foreign ownership chain. For a foreign corporate shareholder, prepare an official extract from the parent company’s register, its articles or constitutional document, the names of its directors, and a chart showing every entity between the French company and the individuals who ultimately own or control it. If a parent is itself owned by another holding company, stop at the individuals or listed entities that satisfy the beneficial-owner rules. Do not submit a chart that ends at “foreign parent” when the bank has asked for the people behind that parent.

Foreign documents should be presented in a way that permits verification. Ask the bank whether it requires a certified translation, an apostille or another legalisation form for a particular document. Requirements may differ according to the issuing country and the bank’s risk assessment. A founder should not add an unnecessary apostille to every page, but should also not assume that an English-language company extract will always be accepted without translation. Record the bank’s request in writing and respond to the specific gap.

The fourth layer explains the business. A concise business plan should identify the services or products, expected customers, countries of operation, anticipated monthly flows, source of initial funds, expected payroll and the reason a French account is needed. Attach a signed lease or domiciliation agreement where relevant, a customer contract or quotation if available, the group website, an invoice model and evidence of the origin of the funds used to finance the company. A start-up without revenue can still provide a credible forecast. What matters is that the forecast, company purpose, capital contribution and expected transfers tell the same story.

These questions arise because Article L. 561-5 requires the financial institution to “Identifient leur client et, le cas échéant, le bénéficiaire effectif”. The grammar is taken from the French text; the substance is straightforward. The bank must identify the customer and, where applicable, the beneficial owner before or during the establishment of the relationship under the conditions permitted by law. A statutory right to seek an account does not remove that obligation.

Article R. 561-5-1 gives a more concrete framework for a company file. It refers to “Lorsque le client est une personne morale” and provides for an official act or register extract, generally recent, showing the corporate name, legal form, registered office and relevant managers or representatives. The company should therefore send a current corporate extract rather than a screenshot of a commercial website or an old incorporation certificate.

Do not conceal a difficult fact in the application. If the company has a second account outside France, say so if asked, but distinguish it from a French deposit account. If a director has changed, provide the filing evidence and explain whether the Kbis has already been updated. If funds will arrive from a parent company, identify the parent and the purpose of the transfer. If the business touches crypto-assets, defence, dual-use goods, sanctioned jurisdictions, financial services or high-value goods, seek advice before presenting an incomplete explanation. An incomplete or contradictory answer can turn an ordinary document delay into an anti-money-laundering refusal.

Finally, separate an account refusal from a request for a product the bank does not have to provide under the basic-services regime. A bank may decline overdraft risk, a credit line, a delayed-debit card, merchant acquiring or a foreign-currency treasury package even when the company can obtain a basic deposit account. Put the requested service in writing: “deposit account with the statutory basic banking services,” followed separately by any optional products. That wording prevents a refusal of credit from being mistaken for a refusal of the account itself.

II. How does the right-to-account procedure work for a foreign-owned French company?

A. How do you apply to the Banque de France and meet the statutory deadlines?

The procedure begins with a refusal by a credit institution, not with a general complaint that banks are difficult to contact. Once the company has the refusal attestation, it can ask the Banque de France to designate a credit institution. The company should use the current channel indicated by the Banque de France and check whether the application is being made by the legal representative, through a mandate, or through an eligible support organisation. Keep a copy of the complete submission and its receipt.

The application normally needs to tell one coherent story. The applicant is the French company; the Kbis identifies it; the refusal attestation demonstrates that a chosen bank declined; the company’s address establishes its French domicile; and the identity documents explain who is authorised to act. For a foreign-owned company, add the parent-company extracts, beneficial-owner chart, foreign director documents, translation evidence where required, and a concise explanation of the group and expected flows. The aim is to allow the Banque de France to make a designation without having to guess whether the application concerns a company, a branch, a founder personally or a capital deposit.

Article L. 312-1 describes the Banque de France referral as occurring “dans un délai d’un jour ouvré” after the relevant request is received in the statutory process. The designated institution must then operate within the statutory time limits. The company should not confuse one working day for the designation decision with the later period for the bank to contact the applicant or open the account. These are different events and should be recorded separately in the chronology.

Article R. 312-7 provides that the designated institution notifies the applicant “dans les trois jours ouvrés à compter de la réception de la décision de désignation”. The notice must identify the documents and information needed and the establishment or branch through which the account will be opened. If the bank asks for additional material, answer in a single indexed package. A foreign founder should avoid sending ten unlabelled attachments from different email addresses: the bank must be able to match each document to the request.

There is also an expiry risk. Article R. 312-7-1 provides that the designation becomes “caduque dans un délai de six mois” if the applicant does not respond as required. A founder abroad may miss the bank’s letter because it was sent to the French registered office, an agent or a secure online mailbox. Put a monitoring system in place as soon as the Banque de France file is submitted. The director or authorised representative should check the channel used in the application and set a calendar reminder for every deadline.

The opening clock should be calculated from the delivery of the required documents, not from the date on which the founder first heard that a bank had been designated. Article L. 312-1 refers to opening within three working days after the designated institution receives all required documents. If a document is illegible, expired, unsigned or inconsistent with the Kbis, the bank may treat the file as incomplete. Ask the bank to list the missing item and state when the complete file is received. That request creates an objective record if the deadline later becomes disputed.

A simple timeline illustrates the difference:

1. Day 0: the company submits a complete opening request to Bank A and retains proof of receipt.
2. Day 0 or shortly thereafter: Bank A issues a refusal attestation, or its silence reaches the statutory fifteen-day point under Article R. 312-6-1.
3. Next working day in the Banque de France procedure: the company’s designation request is processed and a credit institution is designated, subject to the file being complete.
4. Within three working days of receiving the designation decision: the designated institution tells the company how to provide the remaining documents and where the account will be handled.
5. After the designated institution has all required documents: the statutory three-working-day opening period is assessed from that complete-file date.

The dates in an individual file may differ depending on receipt, public holidays, missing documents and the channel used. The example is not a substitute for reading the acknowledgement of receipt. It shows why an applicant should maintain a table with five columns: event, sender, recipient, date and supporting document. That table is especially useful when the director is outside France and a local domiciliation provider receives letters on the company’s behalf.

If the first refusal does not contain the company’s correct details, ask the bank to correct it before submitting the Banque de France file. A refusal naming only the founder may not demonstrate that the French company’s account request was declined. If the bank refuses to issue the attestation, preserve proof of the request and the response, then obtain guidance from the Banque de France or legal assistance on how to present the evidence. Do not manufacture a refusal letter, alter a PDF or use a screenshot that hides the sender and date.

The application should also address the “no account in France” condition directly. If the company had a capital deposit account that was closed after registration, attach the closure evidence or the bank’s message confirming that no deposit account remains. If an account is technically open but frozen, ask the bank for its status. A company that claims to be without an account while a French account remains open may create a credibility problem at the exact moment when the bank is assessing beneficial ownership and source of funds.

The procedure is available to a company even when the director is not physically in France, but remote execution is not the same as the absence of identity checks. The bank may require a video identification, an original document, a certified copy or a physical appearance by the representative. A power of attorney can help with communication, but it does not necessarily replace the bank’s own identification of the legal representative. Plan for that step instead of treating it as an unlawful obstacle.

Where a parent company funds the French subsidiary, explain whether the transfer is a capital contribution, a shareholder loan, a payment for services or a reimbursement. The bank may ask for the board resolution, loan agreement, invoice or contribution evidence. This is not merely accounting detail. It explains why money will move from the foreign parent to the new French account and helps the institution apply its customer-knowledge obligations consistently.

In a contested case, the strongest file is rarely the longest one. It is the file that shows the legal person, the authority to act, the refusal, the absence of an existing French deposit account, the ownership chain and the source and purpose of funds. A foreign founder should ask an adviser to review that sequence before sending a second application if the first bank’s questions reveal a structural inconsistency.

B. What can the designated bank provide, refuse, or close?

The right-to-account procedure leads to a deposit account with the statutory basic banking services. It does not turn the designated bank into the company’s chosen commercial partner. Article D. 312-5 lists core functions, including opening, maintaining and closing the account, one address change each year, account statements and transfer-related services. The text includes “La délivrance à la demande de relevés d’identité bancaire”. A RIB, or relevé d’identité bancaire, is the bank identity statement used to provide the company’s account details to customers, suppliers and public bodies.

Article D. 312-5-1 completes the basic-services list. It includes a payment card whose authorisation is checked for each transaction, and “Deux formules de chèques de banque par mois”, among other services. The account can support standard collection and payment operations, including transfers within the Single Euro Payments Area, or SEPA. The company should still ask the designated institution which channels it supports, which transaction limits apply and whether a particular payment instruction requires prior verification.

Article D. 312-8 states that a person who has opened the account through the designation procedure may receive the listed basic services “sans contrepartie contributive de sa part”. This wording concerns the statutory basic services. It does not promise that optional products, international payment packages, a merchant terminal, a foreign-currency facility or an agreed overdraft will be free. The company should request a written tariff schedule and ask which services are included in the basic package.

There is no statutory guarantee of credit. A company may need an overdraft to cover payroll before its first customer receipts, but the right-to-account route does not compel the bank to lend. The bank may also refuse a credit card with delayed debit, a credit line, a guarantee, trade finance, foreign-exchange hedging or merchant acquiring. The practical answer is to secure the deposit account and basic payment capability first, then make a separate, documented request for any financing product. Combining both demands can make a credit refusal look like an account refusal.

The designated bank retains customer-knowledge obligations. Article L. 561-5 requires identification of the company and, where applicable, the beneficial owner. Article R. 561-5-1 describes acceptable routes for verifying a corporate customer, including official records and documents that show the company’s legal form, registered office and management. For a group with a foreign parent, the bank may ask for documents from several jurisdictions because it must understand the entire ownership and control structure. It may ask where initial funds came from, why a customer is paying from a particular country, and which activities will be performed from France.

Those questions should be answered precisely, but the company should not send passwords, unnecessary personal data or documents unrelated to the request. Mark the purpose of each document, redact information that is not needed when lawful, and retain the unredacted original securely. If a translation is prepared, keep the original and identify the translator or certification basis. A bank’s verification process is easier when the file is transparent and proportionate.

Article L. 561-8 contains the hard compliance limit. When the relevant person cannot satisfy the identification obligations, the institution “n’établit ni ne poursuit aucune relation d’affaires”. The same article expressly addresses the situation in which an institution has been designated by the Banque de France but cannot satisfy the required identification obligations. The designation therefore creates a legal pathway; it does not override anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing controls, abbreviated AML/CFT.

This is why the foreign-founder file should be prepared before the designated bank contacts the company. The bank may not be able to disclose every internal risk reason, especially where disclosure would undermine a suspicious-transaction process. The company can nevertheless reduce avoidable friction by ensuring that the Kbis, the beneficial-owner declaration, the parent extracts, the director’s authority, the business plan and the source-of-funds evidence are consistent. If the bank asks a question that is unclear, reply by asking which document or factual point must be clarified.

The account can also be closed in circumstances defined by Article L. 312-1. The company may lose the benefit of the procedure if it later has another deposit account in France, loses the relevant domicile condition, provides inaccurate information, or uses the account for prohibited purposes. The account is not a permanent shield against sanctions, fraud controls or an unlawful-use concern.

The limits were illustrated by the Cour de cassation, Commercial Chamber, 30 June 2021, no. 19-14.313, a published decision concerning a company whose account had been opened through the right-to-account procedure. The court accepted that, in the statutory circumstances, the credit institution “peut résilier unilatéralement la convention de compte” where the account was deliberately used for operations the institution had reason to suspect were illegal. The case involved the communication of banking details in a sanctions-related financial circuit. It does not mean that an ordinary international payment is unlawful. It means that the company must understand its counterparties, payment route and sanctions exposure and must never treat the basic-services account as a channel outside financial-crime controls.

Article R. 312-8-1 adds a reporting consequence where the institution refuses or terminates the relationship in the situations covered by the legislation. The text states that “La Banque de France est informée dans les meilleurs délais”. If a designated bank refuses after reviewing the file, keep the complete correspondence, ask for the legal and documentary basis that can lawfully be disclosed, and contact the Banque de France promptly. A lawyer can assess whether the difficulty concerns missing evidence, a real compliance barrier, an incorrect application of the procedure or a decision that should be challenged.

After the account opens, the company should implement a short banking compliance protocol:

• keep a current Kbis and update the bank after a change of director, registered office, legal form or beneficial owner;
• preserve the documents supporting capital, shareholder loans, intercompany invoices and significant incoming payments;
• check the identity and country of important customers, suppliers and parent-company counterparties;
• avoid receiving money for a third party or allowing another entity to use the account;
• keep enough balance for tax, payroll, social-security and supplier payments;
• review every new payment route for sanctions, fraud and unusual-circuit risks.

The company should also distinguish French administrative terms when communicating with a foreign finance team. A bank account is not the same as the company’s tax account. The tax administration may use a separate professional space, and URSSAF, the body responsible for collecting much French social-security financing, may use its own payment instructions. A RIB can be requested for each account, but a RIB does not prove that a tax account or a social-security registration is active. Treat each public-body onboarding step separately.

If a customer insists on paying before the French account is ready, document the contractual and tax consequences before using a parent-company account. A foreign account may be operationally useful, but it does not automatically replace the French company’s account for every French payment, payroll or compliance purpose. The company should not present a parent’s account as if it belonged to the French subsidiary. The cleanest solution is to state whose account is used, why, for how long and how the transaction will be recorded.

The practical objective is not merely to obtain an account number. It is to create a defensible banking relationship for a French legal person whose founders and funds cross borders. The statutory route is strongest when the refusal evidence, application file and post-opening conduct all match the company’s registered purpose. When the bank’s questions reveal a gap in the ownership chain or the source-of-funds explanation, fix that gap before escalating the dispute.

Need a quick opinion on your case

A foreign-owned French company can receive a focused review of its refusal evidence, Kbis, ownership chart and right-to-account file before the next procedural deadline.

Telephone consultations are available within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

To discuss the next step, call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or use the French contact form.

Conclusion

A bank refusal after registration does not erase the French company’s legal personality or prevent it from examining the right-to-account procedure. The company must first prove the relevant facts: it is domiciled in France, it has no existing French deposit account, and a credit institution has refused its application or remained silent for the statutory period. The Kbis establishes the registered company’s identity; it does not replace a refusal attestation, an authority document or a beneficial-owner file.

The reliable sequence is to request a written refusal in the company’s name, preserve the receipt and dates, prepare a complete foreign-founder file, submit the designation request to the Banque de France and respond quickly to the designated institution. The statutory timetable includes the fifteen-day silence rule, the designation stage, the three-working-day notification period and the three-working-day opening period after all required documents are received. The six-month lapse rule makes monitoring particularly important for a director based abroad.

The resulting account supplies statutory basic banking services, not an automatic loan or a premium international banking package. The designated bank must still identify the company, its representative and its beneficial owners and may stop the relationship when the legal anti-money-laundering conditions cannot be met. A carefully indexed file, accurate descriptions of funds and counterparties, and disciplined post-opening conduct give the foreign founder the best basis for restoring the company’s ability to operate in France.