Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Graduate in France After Brexit: Can a UK Degree Qualify You for the French Job-Search Residence Permit?

For a British graduate, finishing a degree does not by itself create a right to remain in France after Brexit. The answer to the practical question “Can my UK degree qualify me for the French job-search residence permit?” is more precise: a British degree may be relevant evidence, but it is not automatically the diploma required by the French route. The legal result depends on where the diploma was obtained, which French residence status you hold, whether the course was completed in France, and whether another work-based route is available.

That distinction matters when a French employer is ready to hire you, when your student permission is approaching its end, or when the online application platform has issued only a filing receipt. A British national who arrived after the end of the Brexit transition period is generally treated as a non-EU national for a new study or work application. A British citizen protected by the Withdrawal Agreement is in a different position and should not casually replace that status with a student or job-search route.

This guide separates the eligibility question from the remedy question. It explains the French titre de séjour (residence permit), the préfecture (local state office handling many immigration applications), the one-year recherche d’emploi ou création d’entreprise card (job-search or business-creation residence card), and the evidence needed to deal with an employer, delay or refusal. It also identifies the official rules and decisions that should be placed in the file before a deadline is missed.

I. Can a British graduate use a UK degree to obtain a French job-search residence permit after Brexit?

A. What route applies to a British graduate who studied in France?

The first question is not nationality alone. It is the legal basis on which you entered and remained in France. A British citizen who was already lawfully resident before 1 January 2021 may have rights under the Withdrawal Agreement and a dedicated residence document. The UK government’s official guidance on living in France distinguishes people protected by that agreement from people who moved after the transition period. A person who arrived later for a degree normally needs the appropriate French visa or residence authorisation, and the UK government’s working-abroad guidance confirms the general post-Brexit position: a British citizen usually needs permission to work in an EU country unless an applicable exception exists.

If you hold a French student status, its legal foundation is the carte de séjour temporaire (temporary residence card) marked “étudiant”. Article L. 422-1 CESEDA of the Code de l’entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d’asile, or CESEDA (the French Code governing the entry and residence of foreign nationals and asylum), states:

« L’étranger qui établit qu’il suit un enseignement en France ou qu’il y fait des études et qui justifie disposer de moyens d’existence suffisants se voit délivrer une carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention " étudiant " d’une durée inférieure ou égale à un an. »

« Cette carte donne droit à l’exercice, à titre accessoire, d’une activité professionnelle salariée dans la limite de 60 % de la durée de travail annuelle. »

The wording is important. The student card is connected to study in France and gives only an ancillary right to salaried work. The corresponding employment ceiling is normally presented by the administration as 964 hours per year, or 60% of the annual legal working time. Article R. 5221-26 of the Labour Code expresses the rule in exact terms:

« L’étranger titulaire du titre de séjour ou du visa pour un séjour d’une durée supérieure à trois mois mentionné au 11° de l’article R. 5221-2 portant la mention étudiant est autorisé à exercer une activité salariée, à titre accessoire, dans la limite d’une durée annuelle de travail égale à 964 heures. »

The official Service-Public explanation of work by a non-EU student adds the practical point that the employer must make a named declaration to the prefecture before the job starts. Article R. 5221-27 requires that declaration at least two working days before the start date. The employer should keep proof of the declaration and should verify the document and the permitted hours rather than relying on a general statement that “students can work”.

During the course, this status may solve a part-time work problem. It does not answer the post-graduation question. A British graduate cannot use the fact that a UK degree is respected academically to extend a French student card beyond its legal end date. The application must move to another basis: a French job-search card if the statutory diploma conditions are satisfied, a salaried or temporary-worker route, a talent route, or another category matching the person’s circumstances.

The French job-search route is found in Article L. 422-10 CESEDA, entitled recherche d’emploi ou création d’entreprise. In broad terms, it is aimed at a foreign student who has completed the relevant higher-education course and obtained a qualifying French higher-education diploma at least equivalent to the master’s level, or another diploma listed by the applicable rules. The card is normally issued for one year and allows the holder to look for a first professional experience connected with the training, or to prepare a business project. Article L. 422-11 describes the relationship between the job, the training and the remuneration threshold, and provides a route towards a salaried, temporary-worker or talent card when the conditions are met.

There are two consequences for a British graduate. First, the French card is not a general “graduate visa” granted to anyone who has any degree and finds France attractive. Second, British nationality does not remove the diploma condition. If your course was completed at a French higher-education institution and the institution awarded the qualifying diploma, the route may be available even though you are British. If you studied entirely in the United Kingdom and obtained only a UK award, the statutory fit is a separate question and must be established before relying on this card.

Timing is part of the route. Article R. 431-5 CESEDA sets application windows for certain renewals and requires an existing resident to apply within the applicable period before the current document expires. The exact window can depend on the category and the filing channel. Do not wait for the plastic card to expire before collecting the diploma, transcript, passport, proof of address, health insurance and employment evidence. A complete file submitted through the correct route gives you a much stronger position than a late explanation that the prefecture’s platform was difficult to use.

B. Why does a UK degree create a separate eligibility question?

Article L. 422-10 does not say that every higher-education qualification from any country automatically produces a French job-search card. It ties the card to a diploma obtained in the French higher-education framework at the required level, or to a diploma expressly covered by the legal and regulatory scheme. That is why a UK Bachelor’s degree, a UK Master’s degree, a postgraduate certificate, and a joint French-British award cannot be placed in one undifferentiated box.

A UK degree can still be valuable. It may demonstrate the connection between a job and your training, help an employer establish your qualifications, support an application based on a work contract, and explain the professional project in France. It may also be part of a joint programme in which a French institution awarded a qualifying diploma. But the degree title alone does not prove that the French statutory diploma condition is fulfilled. A British graduate should obtain written confirmation of the awarding institution, the level of the award, the programme structure, the date of completion, and any French diploma or national accreditation attached to the course.

The following working classification is safer than asking only whether a UK degree is “recognised”:

Situation What it may mean Evidence to assemble
French university or school awarded the qualifying diploma The French job-search route may be open, subject to the remaining statutory conditions Diploma, certificate of completion, transcript, school confirmation and proof of student status
Joint course with French and UK institutions The decisive issue is the actual awarding institution and the diploma named in the French rules, not the marketing name of the course Joint-award agreement, diploma supplement, both transcripts and written statements from the institutions
Only a UK degree from a UK institution Do not assume that it independently satisfies Article L. 422-10; consider a work authorisation route or another residence category Degree certificate, transcript, level evidence, job offer and employer documents
Withdrawal Agreement residence status Your protected residence position may follow a different legal basis from a post-Brexit student application Proof of pre-2021 residence, existing card, travel history and continuity of residence

“Equivalence” is not a magic word. A credential assessment, an academic comparability statement or a university letter may help the prefecture understand the qualification, but it does not silently amend Article L. 422-10. The file should identify the exact French provision relied upon and explain why the particular diploma falls within it. If the answer is uncertain, request a written position from the relevant prefecture before the student document ends, while preserving all other routes and deadlines.

The distinction has been underlined by the Conseil d’État, France’s highest administrative court, in its decision of 7 February 2025, no. 497396. The court treated the move from student status to the job-search/business-creation card as a new residence application on a different legal basis, rather than as a routine continuation of the student card. The official decision is available on Légifrance, Conseil d’État no. 497396. For a British graduate, that means the file should contain the legal basis and eligibility evidence for the new card; a request labelled merely “renew my student visa” may not protect the intended route.

There is also a practical danger in treating a UK Master’s as automatically interchangeable with a French Master’s. The French administration may ask what was awarded, by whom, and under which national framework. A UK degree may be a strong qualification for a French employer, but the immigration question is narrower. If the French card is unavailable because the diploma condition is not met, an employer can explore the salaried route. That route is not a consolation prize: it is a different legal mechanism with its own labour-market, salary, contract and employer obligations.

For a salaried or temporary-worker application, Article L. 5221-2 of the Labour Code requires the relevant visa or work authorisation for entry to work. Article L. 5221-5 states:

« Un étranger autorisé à séjourner en France ne peut exercer une activité professionnelle salariée en France sans avoir obtenu au préalable l’autorisation de travail mentionnée au 2° de l’article L. 5221-2. »

That rule explains why a graduate should not start a full-time post simply because an employer has signed a contract. The employer normally submits the work-authorisation request for the new contract. A UK degree can then be relevant to the job’s qualification requirement, even if it does not independently unlock the job-search card. The two questions should be documented separately: “Does the diploma meet L. 422-10?” and “Can this employer obtain authorisation for this particular job?”

II. What should a British graduate do when the French application is refused or delayed?

A. Which documents and work authorisation route should be prepared?

Start by creating a chronology rather than uploading random documents. List the date you entered France, the visa or residence document used, the date your course started and ended, the date the diploma was awarded, the date the current document expires, every ANEF filing date and every message from the prefecture. ANEF means Administration numérique pour les étrangers en France, the French online platform for many foreign-national applications. The chronology identifies whether you are asking for a new job-search card, a renewal, a change of status or a work authorisation connected to a new employer.

The core diploma bundle should include the award certificate, the final transcript, the diploma supplement, a letter from the institution confirming the awarding body and level, and, for a joint programme, the agreement explaining which institution awarded which qualification. Add an English or French translation where required, but keep the original document. Include evidence that the study was completed, not just an offer of admission or an interim attendance letter. If the diploma will be issued later, obtain a dated completion certificate and ask the institution what official document proves that the qualification has been obtained.

The identity and residence bundle should contain the passport, current visa or card, proof of address, proof of health cover where the route requires it, recent photographs if requested, and the filing confirmation. For a British national, add the document showing whether the person is relying on a post-Brexit student route or on Withdrawal Agreement protection. A person who has lived in France since before 2021 should not submit a post-Brexit student narrative without checking whether the protected status is more appropriate.

The employment bundle should make the proposed activity legible. Include the signed offer or contract, job description, salary, working time, location, start date, employer registration details, and an explanation of how the job relates to the completed training. If the job-search card is issued, Article L. 422-11 limits the relevant employment to work connected with the training and to the applicable remuneration threshold. The employer should therefore describe the duties precisely rather than using an unexplained generic title.

If the UK degree does not clearly meet the French diploma condition, ask the employer whether a salaried or temporary-worker application can be made. Article R. 5221-1 provides that the work-authorisation request is made by the employer and that a new contract requires the corresponding request. Article R. 5221-20 lists the criteria considered in granting authorisation. Depending on the route, the administration may examine a shortage occupation or recruitment search, the employer’s compliance with social obligations, the regulatory conditions of the job, the remuneration compared with the statutory minimum wage or collective agreement, and the match between the role and the worker’s training or experience.

The employer should also understand its verification duties. Article L. 5221-8 requires an employer to check with the relevant administrations that the foreign worker holds a document authorising salaried work. Article L. 5221-9 imposes a specific declaration mechanism when the worker holds a student card. The official Service-Public student-work page explains the 964-hour limit and the named employer declaration in accessible terms. These rules help distinguish three situations that are often confused:

  1. A student card may allow ancillary work within the annual hours ceiling, with the employer’s declaration.
  2. A job-search card, once issued, may allow related employment subject to its conditions and the remuneration threshold.
  3. A full-time salaried post outside those limits requires the appropriate work authorisation and residence basis before the work begins.

A filing receipt is not automatically a work permit. Article L. 431-3 CESEDA provides:

« La détention d’un document provisoire délivré à l’occasion d’une demande de titre de séjour, d’une attestation de demande d’asile ou d’une autorisation provisoire de séjour autorise la présence de l’étranger en France sans préjuger de la décision définitive qui sera prise au regard de son droit au séjour. Sous réserve des exceptions prévues par la loi ou les règlements, ces documents n’autorisent pas leurs titulaires à exercer une activité professionnelle. »

That is why the exact document name matters. An attestation de dépôt (online filing receipt) proves that an application was submitted, but the official Service-Public page on application certificates explains that it does not, by itself, prove regular stay or authorise work. An attestation de prolongation d’instruction (extension-of-instruction certificate) can have a different effect during the examination of a complete and timely application. A récépissé (paper receipt issued by the administration) must also be read for its dates and any wording about work. Send the employer the actual PDF or document, not a screenshot with the decisive line cut off.

Article R. 431-15-1 CESEDA states, for an online application:

« Le dépôt d’une demande présentée au moyen du téléservice mentionné à l’article R. 431-2 donne lieu à la délivrance immédiate d’une attestation dématérialisée de dépôt en ligne. Ce document ne justifie pas de la régularité du séjour de son titulaire. »

The same article deals with a timely and complete application that runs beyond the expiry of the existing document: the administration may issue an extension-of-instruction certificate, which can prove regular stay during the period stated and can be renewed where the application is still being examined. The work consequence depends on the applicable category and the wording of the rules. Article R. 431-15-2 is especially important because it identifies when an extension certificate linked to a first or renewed card authorises work. Do not assume that the favourable rule for renewal of a work-authorising card applies to a first application for a student or job-search card.

The documents should therefore be checked in this order: current legal status, filing type, certificate type, dates, express work authorisation, and the category named in the certificate. If the employer’s compliance team refuses the document, ask for the refusal in writing and request that it identify the precise missing authorisation. That written position can reveal whether the problem is the diploma, the residence category, the hours limit, the certificate type or a simple misunderstanding.

B. How can a refusal, silence or ANEF failure be challenged?

A delayed file and a refusal require different remedies. First preserve evidence: download every ANEF confirmation, save the reference number, keep screenshots showing the error and record attempted calls and appointments. Ask the prefecture to confirm the legal status of the application and the right to work. Send a concise written request through the available contact channel, and keep the delivery proof. A recours gracieux (request asking the same authority to reconsider) and a recours hiérarchique (appeal to the authority above the decision-maker) may be useful, but they do not automatically suspend every deadline. If a formal refusal has been notified, calculate the court deadline immediately.

The ANEF platform cannot turn an ineligible category into an eligible one, but a technical failure must not erase a genuine right to apply. Article R. 431-2 CESEDA provides for online filing and a physical alternative when the applicant has made diligent efforts but cannot use the required electronic service. The applicant should show more than a single unsuccessful attempt: record the date, browser or device, error message, screenshots, helpdesk reference, and any appointment request. Submit the complete paper bundle if the prefecture provides that channel, and state that the electronic route was attempted and could not be completed.

The Conseil d’État addressed the administration’s duty to make its digital service usable in its Assembly decision of 5 May 2026, no. 502860. The official judgment on Légifrance, Conseil d’État no. 502860 states:

« Il doit notamment corriger les dysfonctionnements qui affectent le service et qui sont de nature à limiter de façon anormale le droit d’accès des usagers ou à compromettre l’exercice par ces derniers des droits qui leur sont reconnus par la loi. »

This does not mean every slow page produces an automatic residence card. It does mean that a serious and evidenced digital obstruction should be treated as a legal issue, not only as a customer-service inconvenience. The evidence should connect the failure to the practical harm: inability to submit before expiry, inability to obtain the certificate, inability to accept the job, or risk of an unlawful interruption of work.

Silence also has a legal framework. Article R.* 432-1 CESEDA provides:

« Le silence gardé par l’autorité administrative sur les demandes de titres de séjour vaut décision implicite de rejet. »

Article R. 432-2 CESEDA generally fixes four months for that implied refusal, subject to shorter periods for certain categories. A student or job-search application should not be assigned an assumed deadline without checking the category and the date on which a complete application was received. A request that remains incomplete, an automated acknowledgement, or an extension certificate may change the analysis. Create a calendar with the filing date, four-month date if applicable, certificate expiry date, and the two-month challenge period once a decision is notified or legally deemed to exist.

Article R. 421-1 of the Code of Administrative Justice provides that the court is seized by a claim against a decision within two months of its notification or publication. The official Légifrance text of Article R. 421-1 CJA should be checked alongside the notice actually received. A written refusal may state a different legal basis from the one you expected. The challenge must answer that reason: missing qualifying diploma, insufficient proof of course completion, late filing, lack of work authorisation, public-order ground, or an incorrect assessment of Withdrawal Agreement status.

Where the delay causes an urgent and serious harm, a référé-suspension (urgent application to suspend an administrative decision) may be considered under Article L. 521-1 CJA. The official Légifrance text of Article L. 521-1 CJA requires urgency and a serious doubt about the legality of the decision. An application built only on anxiety about a future refusal is weak. An application supported by a signed job starting shortly, a certificate expiring, a documented ANEF failure and a clearly arguable legal error is more concrete.

Recent case law illustrates both the usefulness and the limits of urgent proceedings. In Conseil d’État, judge of interim applications, 8 July 2024, no. 495315, the official decision includes the following description of the effect of an appropriate extension certificate:

« une telle attestation lui permet, pendant la durée d’instruction de son dossier, d’une part, de justifier de la régularité de son séjour et, d’autre part, d’être autorisée à exercer une activité professionnelle. »

The case concerned a different residence category, so it should not be copied mechanically into a student or job-search dispute. Its value is methodological: identify the exact certificate, the exact category and the legal provision that grants the work effect. The official source is Légifrance, Conseil d’État no. 495315.

In Conseil d’État, 2 February 2026, no. 506904, the court considered a student who sought a salaried residence card and an employer’s full-time work-authorisation request. The judgment contains this important clarification:

« Doit être regardé comme ayant achevé son cursus sur le territoire français au sens de ces dispositions tout étranger titulaire d’un titre de séjour en qualité d’étudiant qui sollicite, en application des dispositions de l’article R. 5221-1 du même code, la délivrance d’une carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention " salarié ", qu’il ait ou non obtenu les diplômes sanctionnant le cursus qu’il suivait en qualité d’étudiant. »

The official decision is Légifrance, Conseil d’État no. 506904. The point is narrow but useful: for that salaried route, the court interpreted “completed the course in France” in the context of an application under Article R. 5221-1, even where the student had not obtained the diplomas sanctioning the course. It does not establish that an unqualified UK degree automatically gives a British national the job-search card. It shows why the legal basis of the application and the employer’s work-authorisation route must be pleaded accurately.

If the refusal concerns a UK degree and the job-search card, the challenge should not simply say “my degree is equivalent”. It should identify the institution, the award, the French provision, any French awarding body or joint diploma, the evidence supplied, and the reason the prefecture’s analysis is legally wrong. If the file cannot establish the Article L. 422-10 condition, plead in the alternative only where a real alternative route exists: employer work authorisation, salaried card, temporary-worker card, talent route or another category. An alternative is not a request for the court to invent a status; it is a request to examine the correct legal pathway supported by the facts.

Before sending a challenge, prepare a compact evidence index:

  1. Passport, visa and every residence document, with exact validity dates.
  2. Proof of the date and place of study, course completion and diploma award.
  3. Evidence identifying the awarding institution and the legal level of the qualification.
  4. ANEF filing confirmations, certificates, messages, technical-error records and appointment attempts.
  5. Employment offer or contract, job description, salary, start date and explanation of the link with the training.
  6. Employer evidence for the work-authorisation route and proof of any declaration or request.
  7. Copies of the refusal, implied-refusal evidence or notice that the administration has not responded.
  8. A dated chronology and a short statement of the urgent consequence: loss of work, inability to start, expiry of lawful stay or interruption of professional training.

For wider residence timing, the British desk’s guide to VLS-TS validation, late filing and ANEF remedies provides the connected framework for long-stay residence documents. “VLS-TS” means visa de long séjour valant titre de séjour, a long-stay visa that functions as a residence permit after the required validation. That page should be read together with the current student or graduate route, not used as a substitute for it. A separate overview of the 90-day rule and long-stay visa options for British citizens may also help explain why a visitor stay cannot be converted casually into a graduate work right.

Finally, keep the UK and French sides distinct. The UK government guidance on travel to France for work addresses the British-side travel and work-permission context, while the French authorities decide the French residence and work authorisation. If HMRC, UK student-loan, professional-regulator or degree-verification questions arise, preserve those documents, but do not treat a UK authority’s confirmation of a degree as a French prefecture’s decision under CESEDA.

Conclusion

A UK degree does not automatically qualify a British graduate for the French recherche d’emploi ou création d’entreprise residence card. The strongest case is one in which a French higher-education institution awarded the qualifying diploma, or in which a joint programme clearly produces a diploma covered by the French rules. A UK-only qualification may still support a French employment application, but it should trigger an eligibility review and, where necessary, an employer-led work-authorisation route rather than an assumption.

Act before the current document expires. Establish the status, identify the exact diploma and legal basis, file through ANEF or document the technical failure, read the certificate’s work wording, and preserve the refusal or silence evidence. The difference between an attestation de dépôt and an attestation de prolongation d’instruction can determine whether work may continue. If the prefecture refuses or the platform prevents a timely application, the remedy must be matched to the decision, the dates and the actual harm.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Book a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm to review your British degree, French residence status and work plan.

We can assess the prefecture or ANEF evidence and identify the next procedural step for your situation in France.

+33 6 46 60 58 22

Contact the firm in France

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.