Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Can a French Company Change Its Financial Year-End After Incorporation? Procedure, Tax Deadlines and Foreign-Parent Consolidation

Yes. A French company can usually change the closing date of its financial year after incorporation, but the change is a corporate act with accounting, tax and registry consequences. It is not an informal adjustment made by the accountant or a setting changed only in the parent company’s reporting software. The closing date appears in the company’s constitutional information, and the transition must be documented, approved and reported consistently.

This question is especially practical for a foreign founder. A French subsidiary may have been incorporated with a 31 December year-end while its foreign parent closes on 30 June, or the business may discover that its busiest trading period makes the original date inconvenient. Changing the date can align the French accounts with the group calendar, create a shorter transition period, or postpone a future closing date. It does not, however, erase an accounting period that has already closed or move French tax and payroll obligations into the foreign parent’s calendar.

The safe method is to separate four decisions: the shareholder or member decision, the exact transition period, the filing with the French business formalities one-stop shop, and the tax and consolidation instructions. This article explains the procedure for a French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, a simplified joint-stock company), SASU (a one-shareholder SAS), SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, a private limited company) and comparable companies. It also identifies the records a foreign parent should obtain before using the new date in group reporting.

I. Can a French company change its financial year-end after incorporation?

A. What decision and legal limits govern the change?

The starting point is the company’s articles of association. In French company law, the “date de clôture de l’exercice social” is the date on which the company’s accounting year ends. It is normally stated in the articles and disclosed in the company’s registration information. The legal point is not that every company must close on 31 December. A company may generally select a fixed date that fits its activity, such as 31 March, 30 June, 30 September or 31 December. A variable formula, such as “the last Monday of March”, creates avoidable uncertainty and should not replace a fixed calendar date.

The accounting obligation remains continuous. Article L. 123-12 of the French Commercial Code requires the business to record transactions, control the existence and value of assets and liabilities by inventory at least once every twelve months, and prepare annual accounts at the end of the financial year. The operative French sentence states: “Elle doit contrôler par inventaire, au moins une fois tous les douze mois.” The same provision adds that the annual accounts are prepared at the close of the year from the accounting records and inventory. Changing the closing date therefore changes the timetable; it does not remove the annual inventory discipline.

The accounts must also remain regular, sincere and faithful. That is the requirement stated by Article L. 123-14 of the Commercial Code: “Les comptes annuels doivent être réguliers, sincères et donner une image fidèle du patrimoine, de la situation financière et du résultat de l’entreprise.” A transition year should be designed so that revenue, costs, provisions, assets, liabilities, related-party balances and cut-off entries are allocated to the correct period. A longer or shorter year is not a licence to select a period that hides losses, accelerates a distribution or produces a misleading comparison with the previous accounts.

Because the closing date is part of the articles, the company must adopt a formal decision to amend it. The public guidance issued by Service Public Entreprendre states that an extraordinary general meeting, commonly called an AGE (assemblée générale extraordinaire), should take place before the closing date of the current year. A written record or procès-verbal must identify the resolution and the new date. The public guidance also says that the amendment is filed within one month of the decision through the business formalities one-stop shop.

The exact decision mechanism depends on the legal form and the articles. For an SAS or SASU, Article L. 227-9 of the Commercial Code provides that “Les statuts déterminent les décisions qui doivent être prises collectivement par les associés dans les formes et conditions qu’ils prévoient.” In other words, the shareholders’ consultation, quorum, majority and signature method must be checked in the actual articles. A SAS should not copy the voting rule of a SARL without reviewing its own constitution. In a SARL, the statutory amendment must follow the rules applicable to that form and the version of the articles in force.

The resolution should state at least five points. First, it should identify the existing closing date. Second, it should approve the target date as a fixed calendar date. Third, it should specify which period is shortened or extended and the first year affected. Fourth, it should approve the amended article number and the updated articles. Fifth, it should authorise a representative to complete the filing and respond to a request from the INPI (Institut national de la propriété industrielle, the French intellectual property and business-formalities authority) or the greffe (the clerk’s office of the competent commercial court).

A foreign founder should also decide whether the proposed change is an ordinary operational alignment or part of a wider reorganisation. A group reporting calendar is a legitimate business reason, as can be seasonal activity, an acquisition or a change in the accounting team. The file should still show the real decision date. The company should not sign a resolution after a closing date and describe it as if it had been approved before that date. A post-closing decision may have consequences for the next transition period, but it cannot retroactively reopen signed accounts or substitute an unfiled date for the date already used in a tax return.

The first practical answer is therefore: yes, the date can generally be changed, but the company must treat the change as a statutory amendment, approve it under its form-specific rules, and make the transition date unambiguous. An email from the foreign parent to the French accountant is evidence of group policy, not by itself a French corporate resolution.

B. What changes for accounting, tax and group consolidation?

The central technical issue is the transition period. Suppose a French subsidiary currently closes on 31 December and decides, before the 31 December 2026 closing, to close in future on 30 June. The 2026 financial year can close on 31 December as planned. The next period can run from 1 January to 30 June 2027, producing a six-month transition year, followed by twelve-month periods from 1 July to 30 June. The resolution and the accounts should say this expressly. If the company instead delays the transition so that no balance sheet is prepared at the usual date, the company and its tax adviser must analyse the resulting long period and the separate inventory required during it.

The reverse example is equally important. A company that closes on 30 June and moves to 31 December may have a six-month transition period from 1 July to 31 December. A different timing can produce an eighteen-month period, depending on when the decision is taken and how the next closing is defined. The choice affects revenue cut-off, work in progress, accrued expenses, depreciation, provisions, deferred income, employee bonuses, related-party interest and intercompany confirmations. The accounting file should contain a calendar showing the opening date, the old closing date, the new closing date and the tax return due date for every affected period.

Article 37 of the French General Tax Code (CGI, or Code général des impôts) deals with a period that is longer or shorter than twelve months. It states: “Si l’exercice clos au cours de l’année de l’imposition s’étend sur une période de plus ou de moins de douze mois, l’impôt est néanmoins établi d’après les résultats dudit exercice.” If no balance sheet is prepared during a year, the same article requires a tax calculation for the period ending on 31 December, with the relevant profit later deducted from the accounts in which it is included. A longer accounting year therefore does not make a year tax-free.

For a company subject to IS (impôt sur les sociétés, French corporate income tax), Article 223 of the CGI provides that the profit or loss return is filed within three months of the closing date when the year does not close on 31 December. When the year closes on 31 December, the return is due by the second working day after 1 May, subject to the electronic-filing rules. The tax administration’s current explanation of corporate results also distinguishes the three-month rule from the 31 December rule. The French entity must calculate its due date from its own statutory closing date, not from the parent’s reporting date.

Changing the closing date also changes the way the company plans IS payments. Under Article 1668 of the CGI, IS is normally paid through quarterly instalments due no later than 15 March, 15 June, 15 September and 15 December, calculated from the relevant prior results subject to the statutory rules. The balance is generally paid with the balance statement no later than the 15th day of the fourth month following the close; for a 31 December close, the statutory date is the following 15 May. A 30 June year-end therefore creates a different balance deadline from a 31 December year-end. The company should obtain a written tax calendar rather than assume that the bank mandate or parent-company cash forecast has moved automatically.

The new date does not move every French obligation. VAT (value added tax) returns follow the company’s VAT regime and filing frequency. Payroll declarations and social contributions to URSSAF (Unions de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales, the bodies collecting social-security contributions) remain linked to payroll periods. CFE (cotisation foncière des entreprises, a local business-property tax) has its own annual rules. Commercial contracts, insurance policies, bank covenants, director mandates and employee bonus plans may contain their own dates. A good transition file has separate columns for annual accounts, IS, VAT, payroll, CFE, audit, corporate approvals, bank reporting and foreign-parent consolidation.

The accounts themselves must remain comparable. Articles L. 123-13 and L. 123-14 of the Commercial Code require the balance sheet, income statement and notes to give a faithful picture and explain information needed to understand the figures. A six-month transition period should be clearly labelled. The notes should explain the change, the dates covered, the reason for the transition, the effect on the profit or loss and any comparison issue. If a foreign parent converts euros into its reporting currency, the consolidation package should preserve the French statutory trial balance and the conversion methodology separately.

Foreign-parent consolidation is not the same thing as French tax integration. A parent may request monthly reporting or ask the subsidiary to align to 30 June for group accounts, but that group instruction does not itself amend the French articles. Conversely, if the French entity participates in a French tax group, Article 223 A of the CGI contains a specific same-closing-date rule for the group companies and refers to notification of a change by the deadline for the preceding result return. The provision says that the companies in the group must generally open and close their years on the same dates and that the exception for a different length can apply only once during a period covered by the same option. A foreign parent should therefore ask two separate questions: does the group require a common reporting date, and does the French tax regime impose a common tax closing date?

The distinction has practical value. If a wholly foreign parent simply wants a 30 June consolidation package, the French subsidiary may retain a 31 December statutory close and supply interim information, or it may amend its articles to close on 30 June. If the French subsidiary changes its statutory date, it must still file French accounts and tax returns for the transition period. If the entity is in a French tax group, the parent and each relevant member must coordinate the notification and the list of group entities. A consolidation instruction cannot be used to skip the transition accounts, and a tax-group election cannot be inferred from a foreign parent’s internal policy.

Finally, annual accounts approval and filing remain tied to the French closing date. For an SA (société anonyme, a public limited company), Article L. 225-100 of the Commercial Code states that the ordinary general meeting is held at least once a year within six months of the close. For an SASU, the six-month rule for approval by the sole shareholder is stated in Article L. 227-9, subject to its wording and the applicable statutory situation. After approval, Article L. 232-23 of the Commercial Code sets the filing obligation for companies limited by shares, including the one-month or electronic two-month filing period described in the provision. The new date changes the start of these periods; it does not abolish them.

II. How should a foreign founder file and protect the company?

A. Which corporate, INPI, tax and registry documents must be aligned?

A foreign founder should build one controlled closing-date file before the resolution is signed. The file should be understandable to the French director, the accountant, the parent’s finance team and any auditor. It should include the current articles, an extract of the Kbis (the official extract showing key registration information), the proposed resolution, the transition calendar, the tax analysis and the filing receipts. A Kbis is evidence of the company’s registered information; it is not a substitute for the signed minutes or the tax return.

The first document is the shareholder or member resolution. It should identify the legal name, SIREN (the nine-digit national identification number of the legal entity), legal form, registered office, current closing date and target closing date. It should state whether the transition period is shorter, longer or unchanged, and identify its start and end dates. The updated articles should reproduce the new date exactly. If the company has a sole shareholder, the decision should be recorded in the sole shareholder’s decision register. If it has several shareholders, the convening evidence, voting result and signed procès-verbal should be preserved.

The second document is the filing through the Guichet unique (the electronic business-formalities one-stop shop operated through the INPI). Article L. 123-33 of the Commercial Code says that an enterprise declares its creation, change of situation or cessation by one dossier and that the dossier is filed electronically with a designated one-stop body. Its wording includes: “Ce dossier est déposé par voie électronique auprès d’un organisme unique désigné à cet effet.” The filing should contain the resolution, the updated articles and the details requested by the portal. Keep the submission confirmation, the status history, the request for correction if any, and the final accepted document.

Article R. 123-66 of the Commercial Code requires an incorporated legal person to request a modifying registration through the one-stop body within one month of an act or event that requires correction or completion of the information covered by the following provisions. The article states: “Toute personne morale immatriculée demande, par l’intermédiaire de l’organisme unique mentionné à l’article R. 123-1, une inscription modificative dans le mois de tout fait ou acte rendant nécessaire la rectification ou le complément des énonciations prévues aux articles R. 123-53 et suivants.” The company should not wait for the next annual accounts filing to update a disclosed closing date.

The connection with the registration record is confirmed by Article R. 123-53 of the Commercial Code, which lists the information declared for a legal person. For a company required to publish annual accounts, it includes “la date de clôture de l’exercice social”. That information may appear in the RCS (Registre du commerce et des sociétés, the Trade and Companies Register) and in the RNE (Registre national des entreprises, the National Business Register). A change should therefore be checked against the accepted filing and the updated public extract, not only against an internal PDF.

The third document set concerns the tax administration. The company should notify or update its SIE (Service des impôts des entreprises, the business tax office) through the professional tax account and confirm the first result return after the transition. The INPI filing is not a reason to assume that the SIE has received every accounting detail required for the tax period. In CAA Marseille, 22 July 2020, no. 19MA03567, the court considered a resolution changing a SARL’s closing date and held that “un changement de la date de clôture de l’exercice doit faire l’objet d’une inscription modificative au registre du commerce et des sociétés.” The same decision distinguished the registry transmission from the company’s separate burden to demonstrate that the tax administration had actually received the relevant information.

That decision is a useful warning for a foreign parent. A portal receipt may prove that a filing was submitted; it may not prove that every tax consequence was correctly processed. The file should contain the accepted formalities receipt, the updated registration evidence, the tax return acknowledgement and, where the transition affects an IS group, the notification made by the parent or by the relevant French entities. If the tax office asks why the declared period does not match the prior date, the company should be able to produce the resolution and a short calculation of the transition period immediately.

The fourth set aligns the operational records. The accountant should update the ledger and reporting calendar. The auditor, if one is appointed, should receive the resolution and the transition memo. A bank or lender may require the new annual accounts date under a facility agreement. The payroll provider should know the date only for annual bonus accruals and year-end reporting; monthly salary declarations do not wait for the annual close. The VAT adviser should verify whether any annual or periodic VAT option refers to an accounting year. Insurance, lease, software, grant, subsidy and commercial contracts should be reviewed for financial information covenants.

The fifth set is the foreign-parent consolidation package. Ask the parent to confirm the group close, the consolidation reporting deadline, the intercompany confirmation cut-off, the currency used, the transfer-pricing documentation date and the person authorised to approve the French entity’s accounts. The French statutory ledger should remain identifiable. Parent reporting templates can be delivered in English, but they should not replace the French statutory documents or change the legal period by implication. The subsidiary should keep a bridge from the French accounts to the group package, including entries for consolidation-only adjustments.

For a company with foreign directors or shareholders, language and signing logistics deserve attention. The resolution may be prepared in English for group review, but the French filing must contain documents accepted by the Guichet unique and the greffe. Use the company’s exact registered name and date format. If a translation, certification or qualified electronic signature is requested, obtain it before the filing deadline. Article R. 123-5 of the Commercial Code addresses electronic signatures and the preservation and security of transmissions in the formalities process. A foreign signature workflow should leave an audit trail showing who signed, in what capacity and on what date.

A concise internal checklist can be attached to the resolution:

  • Current closing date, target closing date and exact transition dates.
  • Applicable legal-form voting rule, signed resolution and updated articles.
  • Guichet unique filing submitted within one month, with the receipt and accepted result.
  • Updated Kbis, RCS or RNE information checked after processing.
  • Written tax calendar for the result return, IS balance, instalments and CFE.
  • Accounting memo covering inventory, cut-off, comparative figures and the first post-change annual accounts.
  • Foreign-parent consolidation instruction and reconciliation to the French statutory ledger.
  • Evidence that the accountant, auditor, bank and relevant service providers received the new date.

Foreign founders planning the wider incorporation or restructuring steps can also use the firm’s French company formation and incorporation guide as the pillar resource for the surrounding legal calendar. The new article should link back to that hub so that the specific closing-date question remains connected to the broader formation and compliance sequence.

B. What happens if the change is late, refused or used to postpone obligations?

A late filing creates a proof problem before it creates a drafting problem. The company may have a signed resolution but an outdated registration extract, or an updated extract but a tax account that still expects the former closing date. The response is to reconcile the dates, submit any correction through the official channel, and preserve a dated explanation. Do not create a second set of accounts merely because the parent’s spreadsheet used a different date. First establish which period was legally approved and what the tax administration received.

If the Guichet unique or the greffe requests corrections, check the company name, legal form, representative capacity, article number, closing date and attachments. A refusal does not normally authorise the company to treat the amendment as completed. The company should answer the request within the indicated period, preserve the refusal and correction submission, and tell the parent that the group calendar remains provisional until the French registration is accepted. If the filing is genuinely disputed, a French corporate lawyer can assess whether the articles, voting process or formalities need to be redone.

The tax risk is separate. A changed date does not cancel a return that was due under the former date, and it does not permit the company to leave a year without the inventory and tax treatment required by Article 37 of the CGI. If the company has no balance sheet in a calendar year, the tax calculation must still be considered. If two balance sheets fall in the same calendar year, the results may need to be totalled for the relevant tax assessment. The accountant should map the actual transactions and closing entries rather than select the result that is most convenient for the parent’s presentation.

There is also a difference between late approval and failure to prepare accounts. The recent Cour de cassation, Criminal Chamber, 7 January 2026, no. 24-83.864 concerned an SAS and the offence of failing to prepare annual accounts. The published decision explains that the offence cannot simply be inferred from failure to approve accounts within six months under the rule applicable to an SA when that rule is excluded for an SAS, unless the SAS is a single-shareholder company or its articles set a period for approval. The decision’s title and reasoning matter for foreign founders: the legal form and the actual articles control the approval timetable. The ruling is not permission to delay; it is a warning against applying the wrong company-law rule.

For an SASU, the sole shareholder should still approve the accounts within the applicable six-month period under Article L. 227-9 and record the decision. For a company limited by shares, the accounts should then be deposited under Article L. 232-23 of the Commercial Code. If the company has an auditor, the auditor’s report and any required reports must be included. A change of year-end moves the date from which the approval and filing periods are counted; it is not a general extension of those periods.

The courts also show why a foreign-parent calendar cannot override a French cessation or restructuring event. In Cour de cassation, Commercial Chamber, 26 January 2010, no. 08-12.186, the Court dealt with a company in judicial liquidation and the effect on tax filings and a tax group. It held, in that specific insolvency context, that “la seule cessation d’activité de la société liquidée” prevented the former companies from continuing to be treated as if their accounting periods were aligned for the tax-group issue. The case is not an ordinary year-end change, but it illustrates the governing principle: a statutory or tax period follows the legally relevant event, not a parent’s internal reporting preference.

A year-end change should also not be used to delay distributions. A company must know which accounts have been prepared and approved before deciding whether distributable profit exists. A parent that wants cash upstream should distinguish the accounting close, approval of annual accounts, dividend resolution, withholding-tax analysis and payment date. The closing-date amendment is not a dividend authorisation. If the company has shareholder loans, management fees or other related-party balances, the transition memo should reconcile them at the old and new cut-off dates.

Another common problem is confusing the statutory closing date with a management forecast. A parent may ask for a “June close” while the articles still state 31 December. In that situation, the French entity may produce a management pack as at 30 June, but it should label it as interim or consolidation information and avoid presenting it as French annual accounts. The difference should appear in the parent’s audit file. If the target is a permanent legal change, the company should complete the corporate and formalities steps first.

Finally, preserve the evidence after publication of the amendment. Save the signed minutes, updated articles, filing number, accepted Guichet unique record, updated Kbis or RNE extract, tax acknowledgement, accounting memo, transition trial balance, inventory documents, auditor correspondence and parent approval. The evidence is particularly important when the French company is managed remotely. It proves the date on which the decision was made, the period it covers and the steps taken to inform the registration and tax authorities.

Can the closing date be changed only to match a foreign parent? Yes, group alignment can be a rational reason, but the French company must still amend its own articles and make its own French filings. The parent’s consolidated accounts do not replace French statutory accounts.

Can the company wait until after the old year-end? The official public guidance says that the decision should be made before the closing date of the current year. Waiting creates a risk that the old period has already closed and that the transition cannot be described accurately. Obtain a date-specific accounting and tax analysis before signing a late resolution.

Does the INPI filing automatically update the tax deadlines? It should not be assumed. The company must verify the SIE account, calculate the return and balance deadlines, and retain proof that the tax administration received the relevant information. The CAA Marseille decision cited above shows why registry transmission and tax opposability must be distinguished.

Can a longer year avoid an annual inventory? No. Article L. 123-12 requires an inventory at least once every twelve months. A long transition year may require an inventory at the twelve-month point and another at the new closing date, in addition to the tax calculations required by Article 37 of the CGI.

Does the change alter the company’s SIREN or SIRET? No. The SIREN identifies the legal entity and the SIRET identifies an establishment; the closing date is a separate registration item. The company should update the relevant registration information without treating the year-end change as a new incorporation.

Conclusion

A French company can normally change its financial year-end after incorporation, including to align its French subsidiary with a foreign parent’s consolidation calendar. The defensible route is a properly authorised statutory amendment, approved before the current closing date where possible, filed through the Guichet unique within one month, and followed by a written tax and accounting transition plan. The company should calculate the shortened or extended period, maintain the twelve-month inventory discipline, file the correct IS return, update the registration record and preserve evidence of the tax communication.

The foreign parent should treat the French closing date as a legal data point, not as a group spreadsheet preference. French statutory accounts, French tax returns, corporate approval, registry publication and group consolidation can be reconciled, but they must not be conflated. A clear resolution and an auditable transition file prevent the most expensive errors: a missing tax period, an outdated Kbis, a rejected filing, an unsupported group adjustment or a late approval presented as a year-end extension.

Need a quick opinion on your case

You can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours.

The consultation is with a lawyer from the firm, based on the documents and timetable in your file.

Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 (06 46 60 58 22 in France) or use the firm’s contact form.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.