Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Can a Right-Hand-Drive UK Car Be Registered in France After Brexit? DREAL, COC, RTI and Refusal Remedies

A right-hand-drive car from the United Kingdom is not automatically barred from French registration after Brexit. The difficult question is whether the particular vehicle can be shown to satisfy the French technical route for a vehicle designed for traffic on the left. A V5C logbook proves the vehicle’s British registration history; it does not prove European conformity, French reception, customs clearance or the absence of later modifications. The evidence must be built around the vehicle identification number, its exact specification, its lights, mirrors, speedometer, safety equipment and the document issued by the competent French authority.

For a British owner settling in France, the technical file is separate from the customs file. The customs declaration and certificate 846 A deal with the vehicle entering the European Union; the Direction régionale de l’environnement, de l’aménagement et du logement (DREAL), the French regional environment, planning and housing directorate, deals with conformity; France Titres deals with the registration application. This guide explains the European certificate of conformity (COC), réception à titre isolé (RTI), DREAL checks for right-hand-drive vehicles, the evidence to prepare and the remedies available after a refusal. It covers a private individual’s vehicle, not a commercial fleet, a company-creation project or a French property purchase.

I. Can a right-hand-drive UK car pass French approval after Brexit?

A. What do COC, EU type approval and RTI mean?

The first distinction is between a vehicle’s identity and its technical approval. Article R322-1 of the French Code de la route sets the registration gateway. Its current wording provides: “Tout propriétaire d’un véhicule à moteur autre qu’un cyclomobile léger, d’une remorque dont le poids total autorisé en charge est supérieur à 500 kilogrammes ou d’une semi-remorque et qui souhaite le mettre en circulation pour la première fois doit faire une demande de certificat d’immatriculation”. The same article requires the owner to be able to establish insurance, the appropriate driving licence, domicile and either conformity to a type approved at European or national level, or an individual reception under Articles R321-6 and R321-15.

This means that the French registration application is not decided by the V5C alone. The V5C identifies the British vehicle, the keeper information and its UK registration history. The COC addresses a different question: whether the manufacturer certifies that the vehicle delivered corresponds to a type that has received the relevant European approval. A UK registration document can exist without a COC usable for a French application, particularly where the vehicle was imported into the UK from a third country, was built for a market-specific specification, has been modified or has no complete European approval record.

Article R321-6 of the Code de la route defines the purpose of European reception in precise terms: “La réception communautaire, dite réception CE, est destinée à constater qu’un véhicule ou un type de véhicule, de système ou d’équipement satisfait aux prescriptions techniques exigées pour sa mise en circulation.” In practical language, a type approval is not a promise that every car with the same badge will be accepted. The COC must correspond to the vehicle’s VIN, body type, engine, emissions configuration, safety equipment and the relevant version of the approved type.

For a UK car, there may be several possible situations:

  1. The manufacturer can issue a European COC for the exact VIN and the vehicle remains in the approved specification. The French file may still require a DREAL examination because of the vehicle’s design for left-hand traffic, but the COC gives the authority a substantial technical starting point.
  2. The vehicle has European approval, but the British version has different lamps, mirrors, instruments or other equipment. The existence of a COC does not make those differences irrelevant. The vehicle may need evidence of conformity after the relevant changes.
  3. The manufacturer cannot issue a usable COC, or the vehicle was never covered by a European type approval. The ordinary route is then a national reception or an individual reception. For an individual owner, that route is commonly called an RTI.
  4. The vehicle has been modified after manufacture: converted headlights, a replacement engine, altered suspension, a body conversion, a kit-car structure or a substantial change to the steering or safety systems. The original COC may no longer describe the vehicle that is presented.

Article R321-15 of the Code de la route explains the individual route: “Avant sa mise en circulation et en l’absence de réception CE, tout véhicule à moteur, toute remorque ou tout élément de véhicule, toute semi-remorque doit faire l’objet d’une réception nationale effectuée soit par type à la demande du constructeur, soit à titre isolé à la demande du propriétaire ou de son représentant.” An RTI is therefore not a decorative certificate added at the end of the file. It is the national technical approval route where an acceptable European reception is absent or cannot answer the conformity question.

The word “right-hand-drive” should also be used carefully. The fact that the steering wheel is on the right is not the same as saying that the vehicle is unsafe or legally impossible to register. It signals that the vehicle was designed around a different traffic direction. The DREAL must be able to verify that the lighting pattern, the driver’s field of view, the mirrors, the rear fog lamp, the speed display and other equipment are appropriate for use on French roads. A vehicle may pass one part of the file and fail another: customs can issue an 846 A while DREAL still requests technical evidence.

The French Ministry’s official imported-vehicle information sheet explains that vehicles from a country where traffic keeps to the left may require a reception even when a European certificate of conformity contains a restriction to left-driving Member States. Regional DREAL guidance for vehicles imported from the United Kingdom gives the same practical warning and identifies lighting and fields of vision as points that may be checked. A manufacturer’s general statement that the model is sold in Europe is not necessarily the same as a conformity decision for the particular vehicle. The Ministry’s current homologation guidance also confirms that an individual or isolated reception can apply to a particular imported vehicle.

Ask the manufacturer or its French representative a narrow question before transporting the car: “Can you issue a European COC or an attestation of identification for this exact VIN and this exact UK specification, and does the document describe the lamps, mirrors, speedometer and emissions equipment currently fitted?” Ask for a written answer. If the answer is “the vehicle is too old”, “the UK version is different” or “we cannot identify this VIN in the French database”, that answer should influence the decision to import the vehicle and the budget for an RTI.

Do not confuse four documents:

  • The V5C is the British registration document.
  • The COC is the manufacturer’s certificate of conformity to an approved type.
  • The RTI or its resulting approval evidence is the French individual technical reception route.
  • The 846 A is the customs clearance certificate for a vehicle imported from outside the European Union; it does not prove technical conformity.

The same separation applies to the driving licence. A British licence may allow a person to drive a category of vehicle for a period or under conditions that require separate analysis. It does not make the vehicle technically compliant. Conversely, an RTI does not prove that the driver has the right licence. Keep the vehicle, driver, customs and insurance questions in separate sections of the file so that one document is not used to answer a question it was never designed to answer.

B. Which DREAL documents and modifications matter for UK cars?

The strongest DREAL file is vehicle-specific. It lets the authority identify the car, compare it with the technical description and understand every modification made for French circulation. The current DREAL Normandie checklist for a UK-imported vehicle asks for a copy of the title of circulation or an official document proving ownership and withdrawal of the foreign title, a photograph of the 17-character identification number stamped on an irremovable part, a photograph of the manufacturer’s plate, a manufacturer’s attestation of full European conformity and a COC or specimen COC corresponding to the vehicle. It also asks for evidence about the speed indicator, odometer, dipped-beam pattern, rear fog lamp and, for older vehicles, mirrors or an indirect-vision test.

Prepare a colour scan or photograph for every item. The VIN visible through the windscreen is not always the same evidence as the VIN stamped into the structure. Photograph both if the DREAL instructions require the stamped number. Make sure the number is legible and compare it character by character with the V5C, invoice, insurance certificate, COC and customs declaration. One wrong character can make an otherwise complete application look like it concerns a different vehicle.

The manufacturer’s plate and the COC should be read together. Check the mass, axle loads, type designation, engine code, noise and emissions data, number of seats and body category. If the COC was issued for a left-hand-drive version but the car presented is a UK-market right-hand-drive version, ask the manufacturer to state whether the COC still applies. A generic model brochure, a web page and a dealer’s verbal assurance are useful background information but are weaker than a document linked to the VIN.

Lighting is one of the most visible differences. A dipped-beam headlamp designed for left-hand traffic may direct its asymmetric beam in the wrong direction for a vehicle driving on the right. The DREAL guidance says that the beam must be oriented for right-hand traffic and that a sticker which changes the cut-off line is not acceptable. The practical options may include adjustment, replacement optics or a manufacturer-approved lighting solution. Ask the DREAL or the manufacturer what is acceptable for the exact lamp type before paying for a modification. A temporary sticker may be adequate for a short visit in some circumstances, but it should not be assumed to satisfy a French technical reception.

Mirrors require the same care. The driver sits on the opposite side from the position used in a French-market vehicle, and the fields of indirect vision may not be identical. For a vehicle first put into circulation before 26 January 2010, the DREAL Normandie guidance identifies a manufacturer’s attestation or evidence of approval under Directive 2003/97/EC, and otherwise a favourable indirect-vision test by UTAC-CERAM at Montlhéry. Do not replace mirrors merely because an online forum recommends a particular part. Obtain a written technical requirement and keep the invoice, part number and photographs after the work.

The instrument panel should display speed in kilometres per hour or give the authority a compliant basis to establish the speed indication. The DREAL checklist asks for a photograph of the speed indicator graduated in km/h and a photograph of the odometer in kilometres or clearly showing miles. This does not mean that a miles display automatically prevents registration. It means that the file must explain how the vehicle provides the required information to the driver and how the actual specification will be checked.

The rear fog lamp and other lamps may also matter. The DREAL guidance asks, for vehicles first put into circulation after 30 September 1990, for evidence of at least a rear fog lamp on the left side. It also asks for photographs showing the lighting result rather than merely a receipt for parts. A photograph taken before the modification does not prove the final beam pattern. Take dated photographs after the work and retain the garage’s description of what was changed.

Right-hand-drive is only one possible technical issue. DREAL can also examine braking, tyres, noise, emissions, glazing, seat belts, identification plates, structural repairs and any conversion. A vehicle that has been used as a competition car, camper conversion, replica or rebuilt vehicle may need a different reception route. A salvage category in the UK, an altered chassis, a missing identity plate or an engine change can create an identity or safety issue that a headlamp adjustment cannot solve.

Article R321-6 also distinguishes a reception by type from an individual reception. The authority is not simply asking whether the car looks like another model. It is asking whether the technical requirements for putting that vehicle or type into circulation have been established. If a manufacturer cannot provide a COC, obtain a written explanation of whether it can issue an attestation, technical data sheet or other identification document. If the answer is no, contact the relevant DREAL before import and ask for its list of documents for an RTI.

The technical inspection is a separate document. The current Service-Public procedure for returning to France with a vehicle states that a vehicle previously registered in a country outside the European Union may require a French or EU technical inspection, a certificate of customs clearance 846 A and a COC, identification attestation or RTI evidence. The inspection does not replace DREAL approval, and a DREAL file does not replace an inspection where one is required. Plan the order of the steps so that a test is still valid on the date the registration application is submitted.

Never change the vehicle’s configuration without recording the reason. Create a modification schedule with five columns: original part, proposed replacement, technical issue addressed, evidence of approval and photograph after installation. This helps the DREAL identify a lawful correction and prevents an authority from treating an undocumented modification as a new uncertainty. It also helps a buyer prove what a seller promised and what was actually delivered.

Customs origin remains a separate issue. A car assembled in a European country may have been imported into Great Britain from elsewhere, while a vehicle assembled in the UK may satisfy the rules of origin under the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement only if the product-specific rule and proof requirements are met. The GOV.UK guidance on rules of origin explains that preference requires proof, such as a statement on origin or importer’s knowledge. That evidence may reduce customs duty; it does not create a COC and does not make a headlamp compliant.

Likewise, a customs exemption for a permanent move does not create technical approval. The owner may obtain relief from duty and import VAT and still need an RTI or DREAL conformity evidence. A customs broker who says “the car has been cleared” has answered one question. Ask the broker, the manufacturer and the DREAL each to identify the document they are responsible for.

II. What should you do when DREAL or France Titres refuses registration?

A. What is the correct file and sequence for a UK car?

A refusal is easier to avoid when the file is assembled in the order in which the risks arise. A British resident should not buy or ship a right-hand-drive vehicle on the assumption that the registration application will reveal the legal route at no cost. Use the following sequence.

  1. Identify the exact vehicle. Record the VIN, first-registration date, UK registration number, make, model, body type, engine, steering position, country of manufacture if known, seller, owner, finance or lease status and every modification. Obtain the V5C, invoice or signed sale certificate and photographs before the vehicle leaves the UK.
  2. Ask for the technical route in writing. Contact the manufacturer or its French representative for the COC or a written refusal. Contact the relevant DREAL with the VIN and the right-hand-drive specification. Ask whether a COC, an attestation of identification, a European approval review or an RTI is required. Keep the question and answer together in the dossier.
  3. Resolve customs before registration. The French Customs guidance on buying a vehicle abroad explains that import formalities apply to a vehicle from outside the European Union and that Customs issues the 846 A after clearance. The official Service-Public checklist identifies the 846 A for a vehicle registered in another country. Keep the declaration, assessment, receipt and any written exemption together.
  4. Complete the DREAL process. Supply the title, VIN photographs, manufacturer plate, COC or technical evidence, lighting photographs, mirror evidence, speedometer and odometer photographs, technical inspection and all requested modification records. Do not upload a generic model file in place of a vehicle-specific document.
  5. Arrange insurance. Article L211-1 of the Code des assurances provides: “Toute personne physique ou toute personne morale autre que l’Etat, dont la responsabilité civile peut être engagée en raison de dommages subis par des tiers résultant d’atteintes aux personnes ou aux biens dans la réalisation desquels un véhicule est impliqué, doit, pour faire circuler celui-ci, être couverte par une assurance garantissant cette responsabilité, dans les conditions fixées par décret en Conseil d’Etat.” Ask the insurer to confirm cover by VIN or registration number, the territory, the period, the temporary-registration stage and the right-hand-drive configuration.
  6. Submit the France Titres application. The application should use consistent ownership, address, VIN, customs and technical documents. Upload the DREAL evidence, 846 A or customs exemption, foreign registration document, technical inspection, insurance and the appropriate form. Save the application number, every upload receipt and every message from the administration.
  7. Use a provisional document only within its terms. Article R322-3 of the Code de la route provides that, by way of exception, circulation may be authorised under a provisional registration certificate and certain other temporary documents. The document has a duration and territorial scope. Expiry, an incorrect VIN or an insurance gap cannot be cured by saying that a registration application is pending.
  8. Fit the correct plates after the relevant authorisation. Article R317-8 of the Code de la route states: “Tout véhicule à moteur, à l’exception des matériels de travaux publics doit être muni de deux plaques d’immatriculation, portant le numéro assigné au véhicule et fixées en évidence d’une manière inamovible à l’avant et à l’arrière du véhicule”. Do not confuse a valid foreign plate, a temporary French document and a permanent French registration.

The France Titres file should contain an evidence table. In the first column write the legal or administrative requirement; in the second, name the document already supplied; in the third, state whether the document proves identity, customs, conformity, insurance or ownership. This prevents a common error: attaching the V5C as if it proved the COC, or attaching the 846 A as if it proved the right-hand-drive lighting configuration.

A right-hand-drive checklist should include at least the following questions:

  • Does the COC identify the exact VIN and the vehicle’s actual UK specification?
  • Are the dipped-beam headlamps adjusted or replaced for right-hand traffic, and is the final beam photograph available?
  • Are the mirrors compliant for the relevant date of first registration, or is the required manufacturer evidence or UTAC report available?
  • Does the dashboard display kilometres per hour or provide the technical information required by the DREAL?
  • Is the rear fog lamp positioned and operating in a way accepted for the vehicle?
  • Do the V5C, VIN photograph, COC, insurance and 846 A identify the same vehicle?
  • Has a previous owner modified the vehicle, and can each modification be documented?
  • Does the technical inspection remain valid on the date of the France Titres filing?

Budget the technical stage separately from the customs stage. A COC or manufacturer attestation may have a fee. An RTI can involve DREAL appointments, technical work, an inspection, a manufacturer report or a UTAC test. Headlamps, mirrors and a rear fog lamp can require parts and professional fitting. Registration tax, plates, insurance, transport and storage are separate costs. A cheap British purchase can become an expensive French registration project if the technical route is not checked first.

Where a dealer advertises the car as “ready to register in France”, preserve the advertisement, message, invoice and any statement about COC, customs, conformity or registration. Article 1103 of the Code civil states: “Les contrats légalement formés tiennent lieu de loi à ceux qui les ont faits.” The wording of the promise matters. “European model” is not necessarily a promise of a French COC; “all taxes paid” is not necessarily a promise of DREAL approval; “registration possible” may need to be interpreted with the technical reservations in the contract. Keep the exact wording before a dispute changes the evidence.

The firm’s broader guide on bringing a UK-registered car into France after Brexit deals with the customs, VAT and general registration framework. This article addresses the narrower technical problem of a right-hand-drive vehicle. The two questions should be handled together in a real file, but they should not be collapsed into one document when a DREAL officer or customs officer has requested different evidence.

B. How can you challenge a technical or administrative refusal?

First identify who refused what. A DREAL email requesting a replacement headlamp, a France Titres message asking for a missing COC, a customs assessment, an insurer’s refusal and a seller’s failure to provide a document are different events. They have different decision-makers, evidence and remedies. A general complaint saying “France refuses my car” does not give the recipient enough information to correct the file.

If the DREAL has identified a technical defect, ask for a written description tied to the vehicle and the legal or technical requirement. Ask whether the issue is a missing document, a measurable defect, a mismatch with the approved type, an unrecorded modification or an identity problem. Request the accepted route for correction. For example, “change the lights” is incomplete unless the file states which beam pattern, approval mark, test or photograph the authority requires. The objective is to remove the stated non-conformity without creating a new one.

When the manufacturer refuses a COC, ask whether it can provide an attestation of identification, a technical data sheet or a written reason why the vehicle does not correspond to an approved type. If the manufacturer’s response is generic, send the VIN, photographs of the plate, specification and modification schedule. A vehicle that has the wrong market code or a modified component may require an RTI; that is a technical route question, not necessarily a final legal refusal.

If France Titres has suspended or refused the registration application, request the exact document or rule in dispute. Article L211-2 of the Code des relations entre le public et l’administration states: “Les personnes physiques ou morales ont le droit d’être informées sans délai des motifs des décisions administratives individuelles défavorables qui les concernent.” The article identifies categories of decisions that must be reasoned, including refusals of an advantage that is a right when the statutory conditions are met and refusals of an authorisation, subject to the stated exceptions.

Use the reasoned-decision rule practically. Write the application number, VIN, date, decision or message, document already supplied and precise response. If the issue is the 846 A, attach its identifying number and the customs declaration. If the issue is the COC, attach the COC, manufacturer correspondence or RTI evidence. If the issue is the lighting, attach the DREAL instruction, the repair invoice, the approval mark and dated photographs. Ask France Titres to confirm whether the revised file is complete or whether a different document is required.

Article L411-2 of the same Code provides: “Toute décision administrative peut faire l’objet, dans le délai imparti pour l’introduction d’un recours contentieux, d’un recours gracieux ou hiérarchique qui interrompt le cours de ce délai.” A recours gracieux is an administrative appeal to the authority that made the decision. A recours hiérarchique is sent to the superior authority. Check the notification for the correct recipient, any mandatory prior appeal, the time limit, the channel for filing and proof of delivery. Do not assume that an online message without a formal decision has the same effect as a reasoned refusal; preserve both and ask for clarification.

For a judicial challenge before the administrative court, Article R421-1 of the Code de justice administrative states: “La juridiction ne peut être saisie que par voie de recours formé contre une décision, et ce, dans les deux mois à partir de la notification ou de la publication de la décision attaquée.” The article also contains qualifications, including a prior administrative decision for a claim seeking payment of money and a rule concerning contractual measures. Read the notification and take advice on the exact starting date, any mandatory administrative appeal and the competent court before filing.

An appeal does not automatically authorise the vehicle to circulate. If a provisional registration certificate has expired, if the insurance does not cover the current status or if the foreign plates are no longer lawful for the journey, do not drive the vehicle merely because an appeal is pending. Arrange storage or transport and obtain written confirmation from the insurer. At the same time, do not allow storage costs to consume the appeal period. Send the request for reasons and the administrative appeal promptly while the technical correction is being evaluated.

Where the refusal is caused by a technical misunderstanding, attach a short chronology:

  1. the date the vehicle entered France and the customs document issued;
  2. the date the manufacturer supplied or refused the COC;
  3. the date the DREAL file was submitted and the exact request received;
  4. the repair, test or modification completed in response;
  5. the date the revised evidence was uploaded to France Titres;
  6. the decision or message now challenged and the remedy requested.

For a seller dispute, ask what was promised and what was delivered. If the seller said the vehicle had a COC, request that document. If the seller said that all customs and registration costs were included, ask for the customs declaration and the technical documents. If the vehicle was sold as suitable for French roads but the headlamps, mirrors or structural modifications prevent approval, preserve photographs and an independent technical report. Article 1103 can support a contractual analysis, but it does not remove the need to prove the promise, the non-conformity, the loss and the remedy sought.

The cross-border element also matters. A British dealer, a French importer, a private seller, a transport company and a customs representative may each have a different contractual role. Before sending a claim, identify the contracting party, the governing law clause, the place of delivery, the payment trail and any limitation of liability. A demand against the wrong entity can waste time while the DREAL or France Titres period continues to run. Keep the letter factual: identify the vehicle, the promised document, the authority’s objection, the evidence enclosed and the outcome requested.

A refusal log should remain in the final dossier even after registration succeeds. Record the original DREAL objection, the corrected component, the approval evidence, the date of acceptance, the final certificate and the plates fitted. This can matter when selling the car, renewing insurance, explaining a delay to a lender or answering a later authority. It also shows that the car’s current configuration is the configuration that was examined.

For a British owner planning a move, the safest decision may be made before the car crosses the Channel. Send the VIN and photographs to the manufacturer and DREAL, obtain the customs route and the likely 846 A requirement, price the technical modifications, check insurance and only then compare the total cost with buying a French-market vehicle. The main post-Brexit risk is not that every right-hand-drive car is forbidden. It is that the owner pays for transport, customs and storage before discovering that the evidence for lighting, mirrors, conformity or identity cannot be obtained.

Conclusion

A right-hand-drive UK car may be registered in France after Brexit, but the V5C and a customs clearance certificate do not establish technical conformity. The decisive file is built around the vehicle’s VIN, the exact UK specification, a usable COC or an RTI route, right-hand-traffic lighting, mirrors, speed indication, rear fog lamp, insurance and the DREAL evidence. Customs, DREAL and France Titres answer different questions and should be approached with separate documents.

Before import, obtain a written manufacturer and DREAL position. During the process, keep every photograph, technical report, invoice, upload receipt and administrative message. After a refusal, identify the decision-maker, request the legal and technical reasons, correct the precise defect and use the appropriate administrative or judicial time limit. Do not drive on an expired temporary document or an insurance policy that does not cover the vehicle’s actual status. A narrow, vehicle-specific dossier gives a British owner the best chance of avoiding an unusable car, unnecessary modifications and a missed appeal period.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review the COC, VIN evidence, DREAL request, RTI route, 846 A certificate, insurance position and France Titres refusal. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 (Maître Reda Kohen), or use the contact form.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.