Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Who Pays French Taxe Foncière While a UK Owner’s Estate Is Being Settled?

A British owner of a French house or apartment may die while the property is still registered in the deceased owner’s name, while the heirs are deciding whether to accept the estate, or while a French notaire is preparing the property transfer. The annual taxe foncière — the French property tax on buildings and land — does not wait for the English or French estate paperwork to finish. The practical question is therefore not simply who receives the notice. It is who is legally liable for the year, who must advance the money, how the cost is divided between heirs, and what happens when one heir refuses to contribute.

The answer is governed by two layers of law. French tax law identifies the person or estate appearing on the tax roll, fixes liability by reference to 1 January, and sets the procedure for a claim. French succession and co-ownership law then determines how the debt is administered internally. A death certificate, a British will, an English executor or a delay in obtaining an acte de notoriété — the French notarial deed establishing the identity of heirs — does not by itself suspend the tax. This guide explains the position for a French property forming part of a British-connected estate, including a property held by several heirs in indivision, meaning shared ownership before partition. It also covers a surviving spouse with usufruit, the right to use the property and receive its income, while children hold the nue-propriété, the bare ownership.

I. Who is legally liable for French taxe foncière after a UK owner’s death?

A. Does the tax stay in the deceased’s name and who pays at 1 January?

The starting point is the nature of the tax. Article 1380 of the French Code général des impôts provides: “La taxe foncière est établie annuellement sur les propriétés bâties sises en France à l’exception de celles qui en sont expressément exonérées par les dispositions du présent code.” In other words, a building situated in France is assessed annually because of its French location. The owner’s British nationality, residence in the United Kingdom, or absence of French income does not remove the tax. The official guidance for non-residents on local taxes directs a non-resident owner to the tax service responsible for the property.

The legal taxpayer is normally the owner. Article 1400 of the Code général des impôts states that “toute propriété, bâtie ou non bâtie, doit être imposée au nom du propriétaire actuel.” It then gives specific rules where an immovable is subject to usufruit. The annual reference date is decisive. Article 1415 says: “La taxe foncière sur les propriétés bâties, la taxe foncière sur les propriétés non bâties et la taxe d’habitation sur les résidences secondaires sont établies pour l’année entière d’après les faits existants au 1er janvier de l’année de l’imposition.” There is no ordinary daily apportionment by the tax authority because the owner died on 15 March or because the sale completed on 20 September. The year is assessed by the facts existing on 1 January.

That produces two common outcomes. If the owner died on 15 March 2026, the 2026 taxe foncière remains a charge connected with the deceased’s estate. If the owner was alive on 1 January 2026 and the death occurred later in the year, the death does not create a fresh 2026 assessment for each heir. If the owner died before 1 January 2026, the heirs may already hold the property in an indivision on that date, subject to the registration position and any usufruit. The exact wording of the notice can lag behind the legal transfer. A notice addressed to “Succession of” the deceased is not proof that one named heir personally owns the whole debt.

French succession law explains why the estate can continue to be treated as the relevant owner while the file is being settled. Article 724 of the Code civil provides: “Les héritiers désignés par la loi sont saisis de plein droit des biens, droits et actions du défunt.” The heirs therefore receive the deceased’s property rights by operation of law, even though the formal property certificate and cadastral update may still be pending. If more than one person inherits the French property, the property is usually held in an indivision until it is sold, divided or assigned to one heir with compensation to the others. Article 815 of the Code civil states: “Nul ne peut être contraint à demeurer dans l’indivision et le partage peut toujours être provoqué, à moins qu’il n’y ait été sursis par jugement ou convention.” The existence of that temporary shared ownership does not suspend local tax.

The cadastral position is particularly important for a British family dealing with a French notaire. Article 1403 of the Code général des impôts provides: “Tant que la mutation cadastrale n’a pas été faite, l’ancien propriétaire continue à être imposé au rôle, et lui ou ses héritiers naturels peuvent être contraints au paiement de la taxe foncière, sauf leur recours contre le nouveau propriétaire.” A mutation cadastrale is the administrative update of the cadastral tax record after a change of ownership. It is not the same thing as the private agreement among the family about who should transfer the money.

The Conseil d’État applied this rule directly in its decision of 20 April 1977, no. 02525. The official decision no. 02525 concerned property still held in indivision by heirs and confirmed that the tax could remain entered in the deceased’s name, represented collectively by the succession. The fact that an assessment notice was sent to only one heir did not change the tax roll or make that heir the exclusive debtor. That distinction is crucial where a British heir receives the letter because they are the only person with a French address or because the notaire has listed them as the correspondence contact.

The more recent Conseil d’État decision of 20 October 2016, no. 388940, is even more practical. In decision no. 388940, the court held: “Il résulte de ces dispositions qu’en cas de décès du propriétaire et tant que la mutation cadastrale n’a pas été faite, les héritiers du propriétaire sont chacun tenus à hauteur de leur part dans l’indivision au paiement de la taxe foncière.” It added that the obligation of an indivisor cannot exceed their share because solidarity does not arise automatically from being an indivisor. Thus, the tax may be issued under the deceased’s name while each heir’s internal burden remains linked to their percentage in the estate.

Suppose a British mother leaves a French house to two children in equal shares. One child lives in London and the other lives near Bordeaux. The Bordeaux child may receive the notice, contact the service des impôts, and pay the whole amount to prevent late-payment action. That payment does not turn the Bordeaux child into the sole owner or the sole person liable between the heirs. Subject to the succession documents and any usufruit, the paying child can seek contribution for the other half. The family should record the payment, the tax year, the property, the exchange rate if money came from a sterling account, and the request for reimbursement.

B. How do usufruit, bare ownership, sale and an unpaid bill alter the answer?

A British will or an intestacy arrangement may leave the surviving spouse with usufruit and the children with nue-propriété. This is a different legal structure from a simple indivision. Article 1400 specifically provides that where a building is subject to usufruit, the taxe foncière is established in the name of the usufruitier. The Conseil d’État explained the consequence in its decision of 4 January 1978, no. 08507: “la taxe foncière est établie au nom de l’usufruitier.” The official decision no. 08507 also shows that a private arrangement under which a bare owner pays the bill does not make the bare owner the legal taxpayer for other public-law purposes.

The family can agree that the children will fund the tax, especially where the surviving spouse has limited cash or the estate has been arranged to protect the spouse. That agreement should be written into the estate accounts. It should not be confused with the identity of the redevable légal, the legally liable taxpayer named by the tax rules. If the notice is wrong because it names a child as sole owner even though the spouse has usufruit, the family should preserve the deed, the attestation de propriété immobilière and the usufruit clause before asking for a correction. The attestation de propriété immobilière is the French notarial deed recording the transfer of an immovable from the deceased to the heirs.

A sale creates a second distinction. The date of completion may determine who is responsible under the sale deed for a private prorata, but the tax authority applies the statutory annual rule. If the deceased or the estate owned the property on 1 January, the estate-side owner remains associated with that year’s assessment. The deed can require the buyer to reimburse a proportion for the period after completion, but the clause is an arrangement between the contracting parties. It does not rewrite Article 1415 or automatically alter the tax roll. Before relying on a sale clause, compare the completion date, the 1 January owner, the cadastral update and the wording of the notaire’s statement of account.

Article 1403 also matters after the property has been sold from the estate. Until the cadastral mutation has been made, the former owner or heirs may still be pursued on the role, subject to their recourse against the new owner. Article 1404 provides a mechanism for a discharge when tax was assessed in the name of someone other than the legal taxpayer, but the formal obligations for updating the record must be respected. The legal rule is not a substitute for sending the notaire the signed deed and checking that the publication at the service de la publicité foncière has been completed.

Payment is not necessarily an act of acceptance of an uncertain estate. Article 784 of the Code civil treats as purely conservatory acts, among others, “le paiement des frais funéraires et de dernière maladie, des impôts dus par le défunt, des loyers et autres dettes successorales dont le règlement est urgent”. This allows a person who has not yet taken the title of heir to deal with urgent estate liabilities without that act alone being treated as a tacit acceptance. A British beneficiary who is unsure whether the estate contains other debts should still obtain advice about the acceptance option before taking wider steps, signing a sale agreement or distributing assets.

Once an heir accepts the succession purely and simply, Article 785 provides that the heir answers indefinitely for the debts and charges of the estate. French law also allows an heir to declare that they accept only up to the net estate assets. Article 787 states: “Un héritier peut déclarer qu’il n’entend prendre cette qualité qu’à concurrence de l’actif net.” The annual property tax is a comparatively ordinary charge, but the payment strategy should be coordinated with the notaire when the estate has a mortgage, unpaid works, several properties or an uncertain British liability.

The official Service-Public explanation of local taxes in an indivision gives the operational answer: the tax for the year of death is a debt of the succession; where there are several heirs, each pays according to their share; and the notaire can pay the whole bill from available estate funds if all heirs authorise that arrangement. That is the cleanest route where the French estate account has enough money. It avoids one heir becoming an involuntary lender to the family and creates a documentary trail for the eventual distribution.

II. How can British heirs organise, contest and recover the taxe foncière?

A. What should the executor, notary or heir do before paying?

The first step is to identify the precise debt. Obtain every page of the avis de taxe foncière, the French property-tax notice, and record the tax year, property address, cadastral references, owner wording, assessed base, local rates, waste-collection line and payment deadline. Do not rely on a photograph of the first page. A British heir should ask the French contact person, the notaire and the property manager whether another notice was issued for the same commune. If the property is part of a larger building, check whether the notice concerns the whole building, a lot, land, an outbuilding or a business portion.

Next, create a one-page ownership timeline. Put the death date, the date of the will or inheritance certificate, the date the heirs accepted or renounced, the date of the attestation de propriété, the date of publication, the date of any sale and the date of the cadastral update in separate columns. Mark who held full ownership, usufruit or nue-propriété on each 1 January. This prevents a frequent error: using the date on which a British probate or French notarial document was signed as if it were the statutory tax date.

The amount itself should be tested against the property record. Article 1388 of the Code général des impôts bases the tax on the cadastral rental value, known in French as the valeur locative cadastrale, rather than on the current estate-agent market value. Article 1495 says that each property is assessed by its composition, use, location and condition at the relevant assessment date. For an ordinary dwelling, Article 1496 provides a comparison method, while Article 1498 deals with professional or exceptional premises. A holiday home that was converted into a furnished rental, a barn that became part of the dwelling, or a mixed-use building may therefore need a more careful classification review.

Recent case law shows why the estate file must contain measurements and not merely a complaint that the bill is high. In Conseil d’État decision no. 497701 of 3 October 2025, the court dealt with a local-tax dispute involving the surface used for a parking facility and a partial discharge after part of the assessment was corrected. The premises were professional, so the decision is not a universal rule for a French second home. It is nevertheless a useful evidential model: identify the precise surface, the precise use and the precise part of the assessment that is wrong. In Conseil d’État decision no. 372249 of 28 May 2014, no. 372249, the court examined the valuation method applicable to professional buildings and land. A claim should explain the legal method that should apply instead of asking for a general reduction.

Vacancy is a separate issue for an estate. A French property left empty while heirs live in Britain is not automatically exempt. Article 1389 requires conditions relating to the nature of the property, the duration of the vacancy and the fact that the vacancy or non-use is independent of the taxpayer’s will. The official Article 1389 text should be read before presenting the claim. In Conseil d’État decision no. 265562, the court said that the vacancy test “obéit à des critères objectifs différents” from another vacant-homes tax. A weak rental market or an intention to sell is not automatically enough. In decision no. 400351, the court referred to the failure to establish that the vacancy was “indépendante de sa volonté”. A property locked after a death may require evidence of the actual condition, marketing efforts, insurance restrictions, access problems and the period for which it could not reasonably be occupied or let.

The estate should appoint one administrative contact, but that person needs a written mandate. The heir who lives in France can scan notices, speak with the local tax office and organise repairs. The heir in the UK can retain the estate ledger and release funds. Article 815-2 of the Code civil allows an indivisor to take necessary conservation measures and, if the indivision has no funds, to require the co-indivisors to contribute to necessary expenses. Article 815-3 allows holders of at least two-thirds of the undivided rights to perform acts of administration and give a general administration mandate, with information duties towards the other heirs. The article should not be used to conceal a sale or a major alteration of the property; it is a practical framework for routine administration, including dealing with the annual tax.

Keep a contribution schedule. Article 815-10 of the Code civil states: “Chaque indivisaire a droit aux bénéfices provenant des biens indivis et supporte les pertes proportionnellement à ses droits dans l’indivision.” A tax payment made by one child is therefore entered as an advance paid on behalf of the indivision, not as a gift to the other child. The schedule should show the gross tax, any approved reduction, the person who paid, the date, the bank reference, each heir’s percentage and the balance due on the final distribution. If the property produces rent, the administrator should also record the income and explain how it is applied to tax and insurance.

A useful document pack for a claim or a payment instruction includes:

  • the death certificate and the document proving the quality of each heir;
  • the will, any renunciation or acceptance declaration, and the notaire’s correspondence;
  • the attestation de propriété immobilière, title deed and cadastral references;
  • the usufruit or bare-ownership instrument if the surviving spouse has a reserved right;
  • the tax notice, previous notices and the calculation of each heir’s share;
  • the sale deed and completion statement if the property was sold;
  • photographs, reports, plans, invoices and letting evidence if the assessment or a vacancy reduction is disputed; and
  • a mandate authorising the notaire or one heir to pay and correspond with the French tax service.

British documents may need a French translation or formal certification before a notaire or public authority will use them. Ask the notaire which form is required before ordering an apostille or paying for a translation. The tax service should receive a short, organised explanation with the relevant pages attached, not an unindexed bundle of UK probate documents.

B. What are the complaint deadline, payment route and remedies for a non-resident British estate?

A disagreement with the amount or legal basis is a French tax claim, called a réclamation. It should be sent to the service that manages the property-tax account, normally the tax office for the commune where the property is situated, through the secure messaging service or the channel stated on the notice. The official impots.gouv.fr claims guidance explains the online route and the need to identify the notice and the grounds. A non-resident British heir should not automatically send the claim to the general non-resident income-tax office if a local property-tax service is named on the notice.

The deadline must be calculated from the tax year and the type of argument. Article R*196-2 of the Livre des procédures fiscales contains the ordinary claim rule for local taxes. A vacancy claim has its own rule in Article R*196-5. These provisions should be checked against the current notice and the exact relief requested. A claim about a wrong owner, wrong surface or wrong category is not automatically governed by the same reasoning as a claim about vacancy. Record the date the claim was filed and download the acknowledgement.

The claim should identify only one commune at a time. Article R*197-2 provides: “En matière d’impôts directs locaux, une réclamation distincte doit être présentée par commune.” If the estate contains a house in Dordogne and a flat in Paris, submit separate claims to the relevant services. Article R*197-3 requires the claim to identify the tax, explain the grounds and conclusions, be signed and include the notice or a copy. The notaire’s letter can support the claim, but it should not replace a clear submission signed by the person entitled to act for the estate or accompanied by the mandate.

Paying and challenging are separate decisions. A claim does not automatically suspend the obligation to pay. Where the estate has enough cash, paying the undisputed amount on time can prevent collection costs while the claim is examined. If the estate cannot safely pay the disputed part, ask expressly for a sursis de paiement, meaning suspension of payment of the contested amount. Article L. 277 of the Livre des procédures fiscales provides the legal framework for a request “à différer le paiement de la partie contestée”. The administration may require guarantees depending on the amount and circumstances. The request must be explicit; a general sentence saying that the family disagrees is not enough.

If the tax service rejects the claim, the estate should preserve the rejection letter, the date of notification and the reasons. The official impots.gouv.fr guidance on a rejected claim explains the next route. A judicial challenge is not a fresh opportunity to make an undocumented complaint. The court will need the notice, the claim, the administration’s response, the ownership documents and the evidence supporting the legal calculation. A British heir should ask the French notaire or lawyer to calculate the procedural deadline rather than relying on the date an email was opened in the United Kingdom.

An ownership error has its own remedy. If the tax was placed on the wrong person after an estate transfer, collect the published deed, the attestation de propriété and evidence of the cadastral request. Article 1404 can support a discharge where a contribution was established in a name other than the legal taxpayer, provided the relevant cadastral obligations were fulfilled. A 1977 Conseil d’État case no. 02525 shows that an address on the notice is not enough to turn one heir into the sole debtor. The 2016 decision no. 388940 shows the converse: each heir can still be pursued for their own share while the estate remains in the role. The remedy is therefore often a correction of the record combined with an internal contribution claim, not the cancellation of the entire year’s tax.

The property record can also generate a partial reduction. If the estate’s house contains a surface that was never built, a demolished dependency, a wrongly recorded room or a professional classification that no longer applies, attach plans and dated evidence. The reasoning in decisions nos. 372249 and 497701 supports a precise method-based claim. If the property was empty, the estate must prove the statutory vacancy conditions rather than rely on the fact that the owner died or that the heirs live abroad. Conseil d’État decision no. 434521 warns that defects or administrative obstacles affecting an immovable do not automatically establish a vacancy independent of the owner’s will. The facts and evidence must be matched to the exact statutory condition.

Before closing the estate, ask the notaire to reconcile four figures: the tax due for each year, any amount already paid by the deceased, any amount advanced by an heir, and any refund or discharge received after a claim. If the property is sold, ensure the completion statement records the agreed tax prorata separately from the public-law liability. If one heir has paid the whole bill, the final account should show the reimbursement or set-off against that heir’s share. If a usufruit exists, record whether the family followed the legal default or a written private agreement. This avoids the later argument that a payment was a gift, a loan, or an acceptance of a different ownership share.

For a British-connected estate, the cleanest practical sequence is: obtain the notice; identify the owner and status at 1 January; inform the notaire; release estate funds or agree the advance; check the cadastral record; file a precise claim before the applicable deadline if needed; and keep the internal contribution account. The UK origin of the deceased may make the evidence and banking steps more complex, but it does not change the French tax office’s need for a property address, an owner or succession identity, a tax year and a properly supported claim.

Conclusion

When a British owner dies with a property in France, the taxe foncière for the relevant year does not disappear and it is not automatically divided by the number of people who receive the notice. The annual tax is determined by the facts at 1 January. Until the cadastral mutation is completed, the notice may remain in the name of the deceased represented by the succession. The estate pays the debt, while the heirs normally bear the cost according to their shares in the indivision. A surviving usufruitier may be the legal taxpayer, and a private agreement or sale prorata does not by itself change the public-law position.

One heir or the notaire can make the payment, but the contribution must be recorded. A wrong owner, surface, classification or vacancy assessment can be challenged with the local tax service using the correct deadline, commune-by-commune filing, evidence and, where necessary, a request to suspend payment of the disputed amount. The safest file combines the French tax notice, the death and heir documents, the notarial property deed, the cadastral history, the payment ledger and a clear written mandate. That structure protects the estate, avoids treating the British heir who receives the letter as the sole debtor, and gives the family a defensible basis for recovery or appeal.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review the French property-tax notice, the estate documents and the contribution or appeal strategy.

+33 6 46 60 58 22

Contact the firm through its online form.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.