Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

CFE in France for a Newly Created Company: First-Year Exemption and Form 1447-C-SD

A foreign founder who incorporates a French company may expect the main formalities to end with the Kbis, the official extract from the French commercial register. The first tax form often arrives afterwards: the 1447-C-SD, the initial declaration for the cotisation foncière des entreprises (CFE), the French business property contribution. The fact that a new company does not pay CFE for the year in which its establishment is created does not make the form optional. The declaration gives the tax administration the information it needs to calculate later CFE, identify the business premises, apply any local or statutory exemption, and determine whether a minimum contribution will apply.

This distinction matters particularly when the shareholder, director or parent company is outside France. The registered office may be a domiciliation address, the working premises may be in a different municipality, and the person completing the form may not have a French tax vocabulary. A mistake can lead to an incorrect municipality, an incorrect surface area, a missing exemption request or a CFE assessment that must later be challenged. The analysis below separates the automatic first-year rule from optional exemptions, explains the 2026 filing sequence, and sets out the evidence a foreign-owned French company should keep. It complements the firm’s French company-formation and business-creation guidance and the broader guide to French corporate tax and the first-year tax calendar by focusing on the CFE declaration itself.

I. When is a newly created French company exempt from CFE?

A. Does a foreign-owned French company fall within the CFE rules?

CFE is a French local business tax. It is separate from corporate income tax, value added tax and social-security contributions. The URSSAF, the French body that collects many social-security contributions, does not replace the tax office for CFE. The tax is administered by the Direction générale des finances publiques (DGFiP), the French public-finance authority, through the relevant service des impôts des entreprises (SIE), meaning the corporate tax office.

The starting point is Article 1447 of the Code général des impôts (CGI), the French General Tax Code. The current text states that “La cotisation foncière des entreprises est due chaque année” by persons and entities that habitually carry on a non-salaried professional activity. The official text is available through Article 1447 CGI. The provision is not limited to French nationals or to companies whose shareholders live in France. A French société par actions simplifiée (SAS, simplified joint-stock company), société à responsabilité limitée (SARL, private limited company), SASU or EURL can therefore fall within the CFE rules even when its founder manages the business from another country.

The decisive facts are the activity and the establishment, not the nationality of the shareholder. A French subsidiary carrying on a business in France will normally have an establishment for CFE purposes. A branch of a foreign company can also have a French establishment even though the branch is not a separate legal person. A company that merely owns shares and carries on no professional activity must be analysed differently from an operating company. Likewise, a foreign company with no French establishment is not automatically subject to CFE merely because it has French customers; the territorial rules and the precise place of the activity must be examined.

This is why the CFE form must not be confused with company registration. The guichet unique is the online business-formality portal. The Institut national de la propriété industrielle (INPI) operates the portal. The greffe is the registry office of the competent commercial court. The Kbis is the official registration extract issued after the company has been registered. A SIREN is the nine-digit identifier of the legal entity, while a SIRET is the fourteen-digit identifier of a particular establishment. The Kbis and SIRET help identify the taxpayer, but they do not themselves calculate the CFE.

The physical address must also be classified carefully. A registered office at a commercial domiciliation provider is not necessarily the place where employees work, goods are stored or clients are received. If the company has no other premises, however, the domiciliation location can be relevant to the minimum CFE. Article 1647 D CGI provides that a taxpayer domiciled under a commercial domiciliation agreement is liable for the minimum contribution at the place of domiciliation. The official provision is available at Article 1647 D CGI. The form should therefore describe the real arrangement rather than reproducing a generic address without explanation.

The distinction between the registered office and the operating premises becomes important where the foreign founder uses a French coworking site, a warehouse, a client site or a home office. The company should keep the lease, domiciliation agreement, service agreement, invoices and any document showing which premises were available for the business during the relevant period. A foreign parent company should also preserve the agreement governing the French subsidiary’s use of premises. The question is not whether a document looks French enough; it is whether the document proves the location and nature of the establishment that the form describes.

French case law shows why the tax should be treated as a statutory obligation rather than as an optional charge negotiated with the tax office. In Cour de cassation, Commercial Chamber, 24 March 2021, no. 20-13.832, the Court stated that CFE is “une obligation légale et est inhérente à l’activité poursuivie” in the circumstances examined. That decision concerned the treatment of CFE in insolvency proceedings, not the first-year exemption for a new company. Its practical value here is narrower: once the factual conditions for CFE are present, the company should not assume that a foreign shareholder, a foreign bank account or a remote director removes the tax obligation.

Finally, CFE should be kept separate from the company’s other French compliance systems. The legal calendar can also contain corporate accounts, beneficial-owner information, VAT returns, payroll and URSSAF obligations. Each system has a different authority, form and deadline. A foreign founder who has completed the INPI registration, obtained a Kbis and opened an account has not necessarily completed the first CFE step. The initial 1447-C-SD must be treated as a separate tax filing with its own evidence trail.

B. What does the first-year CFE exemption mean in practice?

The automatic rule is found in Article 1478 CGI. For a newly created establishment, the text states that “la cotisation foncière des entreprises n’est pas due pour l’année de la création”. The current official version is available at Article 1478 CGI. If a French company or a new establishment is created in 2026, the ordinary result is that no CFE is due for 2026 on account of that creation. The rule applies by reference to the year of creation; it is not a promise that the company will never pay local business tax.

The next year is different. Article 1478 provides that, for the first year of assessment following the year of creation, the new operator’s assessment base is reduced by half. The tax base is not the same concept as the final amount on the notice. The final CFE can depend on the municipality or intermunicipal body, the premises, the applicable rate, any minimum contribution and any specific exemption. A foreign founder should therefore avoid the shorthand that “CFE is half price next year” without checking the calculation. The safer explanation is that the statutory base reduction applies to the first assessment year, subject to the other CFE rules.

Consider a company incorporated and operating from a French establishment on 15 June 2026. The company should generally have no CFE to pay for 2026 under the year-of-creation rule. It should nevertheless file Form 1447-C-SD by 31 December 2026. The information will be used to determine its 2027 CFE. The 2027 assessment is the first assessment after creation, so the reduced-base rule may apply. The company should then expect the ordinary CFE framework to become more significant from 2028, while still checking its turnover, premises, local rates and any continuing exemption.

Now compare a company that acquires an existing business or takes over an existing establishment. That is not necessarily a creation. Form 1447-C-SD contains different choices for creation, acquisition, transfer and change of operator because the legal consequences differ. A founder who buys a French business, moves an existing foreign activity into France or changes the operator of a premises should not tick “creation” simply because a new legal entity has appeared in the transaction documents. The effective date, the premises, the prior operator and the continuity of activity must be reviewed together.

The same care is needed when an existing French company opens a second location. The new location can be a newly created establishment even though the legal entity already existed. In that situation, the company may need an initial declaration for the establishment and should identify the principal establishment and any additional premises consistently. A company with multiple municipalities may also face different local rates. The form is not just a notification of the legal entity; it is a description of the taxable establishments.

A further distinction concerns the minimum CFE. Article 1647 D sets minimum bases according to the amount of turnover or receipts. It also states that “les redevables réalisant un montant de chiffre d’affaires ou de recettes inférieur ou égal à 5 000 € sont exonérés de la cotisation minimum”. The threshold must be applied using the statutory reference rules and, where the reference period is shorter than twelve months, the amount may have to be annualised. This is not the same as the automatic exemption for the year of creation. It is a separate rule that may apply in later years if the company’s relevant turnover or receipts remain within the statutory threshold.

For a company with no dedicated premises, the minimum contribution can be more important than a calculation based on the rental value of a business premises. Article 1647 D also addresses taxpayers without a local or land and includes the commercial domiciliation situation. The local authority sets the minimum base within the statutory bands. A company should not assume that a low rent, a free registered office or a virtual-office package means a zero CFE after the creation year.

Optional exemptions are another matter. Some depend on the activity, the location, a local deliberation or a specific regime. Examples may include certain priority areas, rural revitalisation zones or innovation regimes, but eligibility is fact-specific and can change. The first-year exemption under Article 1478 is not a substitute for requesting an optional exemption. If a company wants an optional relief from the first year in which it would otherwise apply, the request must be made in the correct declaration and within the applicable deadline. The official Service Public Entreprendre CFE guidance and the current notice to Form 1447-C-SD should be checked before the form is signed.

The practical conclusion is simple but often misunderstood: no CFE payment in the creation year does not mean no CFE file. The company should create a calendar entry, identify the SIE, keep proof of submission, and record the premises and turnover data used. That file is valuable later if the 2027 notice does not correspond to the information that was declared.

II. How should a foreign founder file Form 1447-C-SD and correct an assessment?

A. Which boxes, documents and deadlines apply?

Form 1447-C-SD is the initial CFE declaration. The official form and its current-year versions are published by the French tax administration at impots.gouv.fr. The form is not an annual return in the ordinary sense. It is the initial declaration for a created or acquired establishment, with a later modificative form used when relevant facts change. A foreign founder should use the official version for the relevant year rather than a saved PDF from a previous year.

Article 1477 CGI sets the declarative framework. For a creation or change during the year, it requires that “une déclaration provisoire doit être fournie avant le 1er janvier de l’année suivant celle de la création”. The official text is available at Article 1477 CGI. In practical terms, a company created during 2026 should send its initial declaration by 31 December 2026. The official tax administration also explains the deadline and the content of the initial declaration in its CFE filing guidance.

Before completing the document, assemble a coherent identification file. It should normally include the Kbis, the SIRET of the establishment, the company’s legal name, the registered address, the actual activity, the date on which the establishment began and the contact details for the person responsible for the filing. If the Kbis is still pending, do not invent a SIRET. Obtain the available registration evidence and ask the SIE how it wants the declaration handled. The company should later retain the final Kbis and confirm that the SIRET on the tax records matches the establishment described in the form.

Frame A1 concerns the company and establishment identity. Check the legal name, address and activity against the Kbis and the INPI filing. A foreign parent’s brand name is not necessarily the legal name of the French subsidiary. A director’s personal address is not automatically the establishment address. If the French company uses a trading name, state the legal entity accurately and preserve the supporting corporate documents.

Frame A2 is important where the business is conducted from a home, at client premises or without another dedicated local. If the company has no other premises, describe the space used for the activity as the official instructions require. Do not use a symbolic surface area merely because the founder works remotely. The declared information should be consistent with the actual business arrangement. If the founder lives outside France and the company has a French domiciliation address, do not treat the founder’s foreign home as the French establishment unless the facts support that conclusion.

Frame A3 identifies the origin of the establishment. “Creation” is different from “acquisition”, “transfer” and a change of operator. This selection can affect the starting year, the taxable base and the documents needed. Frame A4 concerns the previous operator where an existing establishment or business has been acquired. A company that has bought a fonds de commerce, meaning a French business undertaking, should not leave the previous-operator information blank without checking the transaction structure.

Frames B1 and B2 collect information about the company and the establishment. The filing may ask for the creation date, employee numbers, estimated turnover or receipts, seasonal activity and the number of months of activity. A foreign founder should distinguish an estimate requested for the form from a contractual revenue commitment. The estimate should be based on the company’s business plan and accounting records, and the calculation should state whether it is before or after tax where the form asks for turnover excluding tax.

Frame C concerns premises and property-tax information. If the company rents a French office, keep the lease and identify the owner and the surface used. If it occupies a coworking site, keep the service agreement and the description of the access rights. If it is commercially domiciled, retain the domiciliation contract and record whether any other premises exist. If the company owns a premises, preserve the purchase document and property information. The CFE base under Article 1467 CGI begins with the rental value of taxable property available for the professional activity during the relevant period. The official rule states that the CFE “a pour base la valeur locative des biens passibles d’une taxe foncière situés en France”; see Article 1467 CGI.

Article 1467 A CGI sets the reference period for the normal base calculation. It states that the reference period is generally “l’avant-dernière année précédant celle de l’imposition”, subject to the special rules in Article 1478. The current text is available at Article 1467 A CGI. For a newly created establishment, Article 1478 modifies the normal timing, which is why the creation date and the premises available at 31 December of the first activity year must be documented carefully.

Frame D is where specific exemptions or reliefs may need to be requested. The initial form can contain information needed for a local or statutory exemption, and some reliefs require a separate form or a local decision. Do not tick every box as a precaution. Check the eligibility condition, the relevant municipality and the current notice. If the company has a real claim, describe the facts and attach the requested evidence. If a local option is involved, preserve the municipal or intermunicipal decision and the date on which it became applicable.

The completed form should be sent to the competent SIE. Depending on the current instructions, the route may be the professional messaging system on impots.gouv.fr or a postal submission. A foreign founder should avoid relying on an unsigned scan sitting in an email draft. Save the signed PDF, the transmission receipt, the date, the destination SIE and the documents attached. If the founder is abroad, appointing a French accountant or lawyer to assist with the filing can be useful, but the company should retain the mandate and the final submitted version.

A practical 2026 checklist is therefore: confirm the creation or acquisition classification; confirm the SIRET; identify the correct SIE; download the current 1447-C-SD; complete the identity, activity, premises, turnover and exemption information; attach or retain the Kbis, lease or domiciliation evidence; submit by 31 December 2026; and calendar the first CFE notice for 2027. The company should also keep a copy of the broader INPI file, because a later discrepancy between the Kbis, SIRET, premises and tax notice is easier to explain when the chronology is complete.

B. What should you do if CFE is assessed, the form is late or premises change?

If a new company receives a CFE notice for the year of creation, begin by checking the facts rather than assuming that the tax office made a simple error. Was the establishment really created in that year? Was the company acquiring an existing activity? Was there an earlier establishment under another SIRET? Did the company move premises or change operator? Was the notice issued for a different establishment in the same municipality? The first-year exemption applies to the legal situation described by Article 1478, so the evidence must identify the establishment and its effective date.

Read the notice line by line. Check the tax year, SIRET, municipality, establishment address, taxable base, minimum base, local rate, exemptions, reliefs and payment deadline. Compare those items with the 1447-C-SD, the Kbis, the lease or domiciliation contract, the accounting records and the correspondence with the SIE. If a foreign parent paid for premises or services, clarify whether the French company had the premises available for its own professional activity. A spreadsheet showing the premises and dates can be more useful than a general assertion that the company was “new”.

The collection mechanism also matters. Article 1679 quinquies CGI states that CFE and its additional taxes “sont recouvrées par voie de rôles”; the official text is available at Article 1679 quinquies CGI. In Cour de cassation, Commercial Chamber, 4 October 2023, no. 22-14.410, the Court held that CFE is “un impôt recouvré, non par voie d’avis de recouvrement mais par voie de rôle”. The decision concerned proof of a tax claim in safeguard proceedings, not a new-founder exemption. It nevertheless prevents a common procedural mistake: the company should identify the tax roll and the CFE notice rather than looking only for an avis de mise en recouvrement.

If the assessment is wrong, send a formal reclamation to the SIE with the notice, the legal basis of the request, the chronology and the supporting documents. Article L. 190 of the Livre des procédures fiscales, the French Tax Procedure Book, recognises claims seeking correction of errors in the assessment or calculation of tax. It describes claims relating to taxes and penalties as falling within contentious jurisdiction when they seek the repair of assessment or calculation errors; see Article L. 190 LPF. A secure message through the company’s professional tax account should be saved, and a postal submission should be sent in a way that proves receipt.

The time limit must be protected. Article R*196-2 LPF states that a claim concerning local direct taxes must be presented “au plus tard le 31 décembre de l’année suivant celle” of the relevant event, including the placing of the tax roll into collection. The official text is available at Article R*196-2 LPF. For example, a CFE roll put into collection in 2027 will generally have a claim deadline of 31 December 2028, subject to the exact legal basis and any special rule stated on the notice. Do not treat an informal request for information as a formal reclamation unless the filing clearly identifies the assessment and the relief sought.

The form of the claim should be adapted to the error. If the company was exempt because the establishment was created in the assessed year, attach the Kbis, the SIRET evidence, the INPI chronology and the opening or creation documents. If the wrong premises were used, attach the lease, domiciliation agreement, termination notice and move-in dates. If the minimum contribution was calculated using the wrong turnover, attach the accounts and the reference-period calculation. If an optional exemption was omitted, explain the statutory conditions and attach the evidence that should have been supplied with the initial declaration.

Where several municipalities or establishments are involved, do not submit one vague global message. Article R*197-2 LPF provides that “une réclamation distincte doit être présentée par commune” for local direct taxes. The official provision is available at Article R*197-2 LPF. The claim should identify each notice and each establishment concerned. A foreign group with a French subsidiary and a branch may need separate schedules even if the same parent company funds both structures.

If the initial form was filed late, file it as soon as possible and explain the reason. A late filing is not automatically cured by the first-year payment exemption. The SIE still needs the information used to determine later CFE, and an optional relief may have its own deadline. The company should not backdate a document, change the creation date to obtain a tax result or send inconsistent versions to different offices. The correct approach is to submit the accurate information, state the date of actual filing and ask the SIE how it will process the correction.

If the business changes premises, update the tax information promptly. A move can alter the establishment’s municipality, the taxable property, the domiciliation analysis, the minimum contribution and the applicable local rate. A company that keeps the old registered office on the Kbis while working from a new site must also examine its corporate and INPI obligations. A new SIRET may be required, and the CFE form should match the legal and factual sequence. The tax file should never be used to conceal an unrecorded corporate move.

A foreign founder should also distinguish a correction of CFE from a challenge to another tax. A CFE reclamation does not automatically resolve corporate income tax, VAT, payroll or social-security questions. It is possible for the CFE address to be correct while VAT registration is incomplete, or for the CFE amount to be correct while the company has another problem with its employment registration. Keep each claim within its own tax and factual scope, and cross-reference documents only when the connection is real.

Finally, preserve the full audit file for at least the period required by the company’s tax and accounting obligations. That file should contain the submitted 1447-C-SD, all pages and annexes, the transmission receipt, the Kbis and SIRET history, leases and domiciliation agreements, invoices proving access to premises, turnover calculations, exemption requests, SIE replies and any CFE notices. A foreign parent should be able to understand the file without relying on the memory of the local founder. This is especially important when the French director changes, the company is put on hold, or the French activity is later closed.

Need a quick opinion on your case

We offer a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review the creation date, the 1447-C-SD, the French premises or domiciliation arrangement, the CFE notice and any reclamation deadline.

Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 (Maître Reda Kohen), or use the contact page. The firm can assist founders and companies operating in Paris, Île-de-France and elsewhere in France.

Conclusion

A French company created by a foreign founder is normally exempt from CFE for the year in which its establishment is created, but it must still submit the initial 1447-C-SD by the end of that creation year. The declaration is the foundation for the later assessment: it records the establishment, premises, domiciliation, turnover, employees and possible exemptions. The first assessment year is not the same as the creation year, and the statutory reduction of the assessment base must not be confused with a permanent exemption or a zero tax result in later years.

The safest file links the Kbis, SIRET, INPI chronology, premises documents, tax-account transmission and CFE notice. If an assessment is wrong, challenge it through a documented reclamation before the applicable deadline, identifying the establishment and municipality precisely. For a foreign-owned company, the core risk is rarely the existence of a French acronym; it is the gap between the legal registration, the actual premises and the tax information sent to the SIE. Closing that gap early protects the company’s first French tax calendar and makes any later correction far easier.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.