Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Can British Citizens Still Vote in France After Brexit? The French Ballot You Lost, the UK Vote You Kept, and How to Challenge a Refusal

Searches for “electoral roll” have surged in Britain and Ireland this week, and many of the people typing those words live on the other side of the Channel. If you are a British citizen settled in France, the question behind the search is a sharp one: after Brexit, can you still vote in France, and where else can you vote at all? The short answer is split in two. Since 1 February 2020 you cannot vote in any French election, municipal or European, and the Cour de cassation has now confirmed that exclusion three times over, including twice in cases brought by British residents themselves. But you have not lost every vote: as a British citizen who previously lived in the United Kingdom, you can register as an overseas voter and vote in UK Parliament elections from your French address, by post, by proxy or in person when you are back in Britain. This guide explains both halves in full: why the French electoral roll is closed to you and which court decisions sealed it, how the French registration and challenge machinery works if you are refused or removed, and how to register, renew and protect your British overseas vote, with every decisive rule quoted from the official text.

I. Can a British Resident Still Vote in French Elections After Brexit?

The blunt answer is no, and it has been tested to the highest level. Before Brexit, British residents voted in French municipal elections and in European elections in France as citizens of the European Union. That right survived neither the withdrawal agreement nor the litigation that followed. Two British residents challenged their removal from the French rolls all the way to the Cour de cassation, one of them twice over with references to the Court of Justice of the European Union, and both lost. Understanding exactly what was decided matters, because it tells you which doors are closed, which one remains open through French nationality, and why no individual examination of your personal situation can change the outcome.

A. Why the French Electoral Roll Is Closed to British Citizens: Municipal and European Elections

French electoral law reserves the general roll to French nationals. Article L2 of the Code électoral, the Electoral Code, states the rule in one sentence: “Sont électeurs les Françaises et Français âgés de dix-huit ans accomplis, jouissant de leurs droits civils et politiques et n’étant dans aucun cas d’incapacité prévu par la loi.” In plain English: only French men and women aged eighteen or over, enjoying their civil and political rights and under no legal incapacity, are electors. The only exception ever made for foreign residents concerned citizens of the European Union, and it was fenced off on a separate roll. Article LO227-1 provides that “Les citoyens de l’Union européenne résidant en France, autres que les citoyens français, peuvent participer à l’élection des conseillers municipaux dans les mêmes conditions que les électeurs français, sous réserve des dispositions de la présente section.” EU citizens living in France, other than French citizens, may therefore vote in municipal council elections on the same terms as French electors. Article LO227-2 adds the mechanics: “Pour exercer leur droit de vote, les personnes visées à l’article LO 227-1 doivent être inscrites, à leur demande, sur une liste électorale complémentaire.” To vote, they must apply to join a complementary electoral roll, the liste électorale complémentaire, a second roll kept alongside the main one for EU citizens, one for municipal elections and one for European elections. The official service-public.fr guidance confirms the same architecture in English: only nationals of a European Union Member State other than France may use these complementary rolls, and it cites the governing statute, Law No. 77-729 of 7 July 1977 on the election of representatives to the European Parliament, for European elections.

The moment the United Kingdom ceased to be a Member State, British residents fell outside both provisions. That is precisely what the Cour de cassation held on 1 October 2020 in the first great Brexit voting case, Second Civil Chamber, appeal No. 20-16.901, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:C201153, a claim by Mr O., a British resident of Le Dorat in Haute-Vienne who said he had been on the French rolls since 2009 and was removed when the withdrawal agreement took effect. He asked to be re-registered for the postponed second round of the 2020 municipal elections, the mayor refused on 7 May 2020, the control commission confirmed the refusal on 4 June, and he fought the case up with arguments based on retained European citizenship, non-discrimination and proportionality, even seeking a reference to the Court of Justice. The Cour de cassation rejected everything. Its central holding deserves quotation in full: “qu’à compter du 1er février 2020, date d’entrée en vigueur de cet accord, le Royaume-Uni a cessé d’être un État membre de l’Union et que, par suite, ses ressortissants ne jouissent plus de la citoyenneté européenne, à laquelle est subordonné, aux termes des articles 88-3 de la Constitution du 4 octobre 1958 et L.O. 227-1 du code électoral, le droit de vote et d’éligibilité aux élections municipales en France.” Since 1 February 2020, the Court says, the United Kingdom is no longer a Member State, its nationals no longer enjoy European citizenship, and European citizenship is the precondition for municipal voting rights under Article 88-3 of the Constitution and Article LO227-1. The Court added that there was no need for a Luxembourg reference: “il n’y a pas lieu de saisir la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne à titre préjudiciel, en interprétation ou en appréciation de validité de l’accord sur le retrait du Royaume-Uni.” And it disposed of the case with the single line “REJETTE le pourvoi.” Read the full ruling here: Cass. Civ. 2e, 1 October 2020, No. 20-16.901.

One limb of that 2020 reasoning gave British readers a crumb of comfort that is worth understanding. Mr O. argued that losing the French municipal vote left him with no vote anywhere, a disproportionate wound. The Court answered that he had kept his British voting rights and therefore could not claim to have been stripped of every electoral right. That sentence is the bridge to Part II of this guide: the British vote survived, and it is the one you must now organise.

The second British case went further and closed the European-elections door too. Mrs U., a British farmer living in a commune in the Gers since 1984, challenged her removal from the complementary roll for European elections. Her case produced two references to Luxembourg, CJEU 9 June 2022, Préfet du Gers I, C-673/20, and CJEU 18 April 2024, Préfet du Gers II, C-716/22, and then a final French ruling: Cass. Civ. 2e, 9 October 2025, No. 25-60.142, cassation without remand at the prefect’s request. The Cour de cassation recited the Luxembourg answers word for word. On municipal elections: the EU provisions “doivent être interprétés en ce sens que, depuis le retrait du Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord (le Royaume-Uni) de l’Union européenne, le 1er février 2020, les ressortissants de cet État qui ont exercé leur droit de résider dans un État membre avant la fin de la période de transition, ne bénéficient plus du statut de citoyen de l’Union, ni, plus particulièrement, au titre de l’article 20, paragraphe 2, sous b), et de l’article 22 du TFUE, du droit de vote et d’éligibilité aux élections municipales dans leur État membre de résidence, y compris lorsqu’ils sont également privés, en vertu du droit de l’État dont ils sont ressortissants, du droit de vote aux élections organisées par ce dernier État (CJUE, arrêt du 9 juin 2022, Préfet du Gers I, C-673/20).” Even voters who had exercised residence rights before the end of the transition period, and even voters left voteless under British law, keep no municipal vote. On European elections the answer was identical: since 1 February 2020, British residents “ne bénéficient plus d’un droit de vote et d’éligibilité aux élections au Parlement européen dans leur État membre de résidence (CJUE, arrêt du 18 avril 2024, Préfet du Gers II, C-716/22)”. The French Court drew the general conclusion in a sentence every British reader should memorise: “un ressortissant du Royaume-Uni ne peut être inscrit en France sur les listes électorales complémentaires en vue de participer aux élections municipales et aux élections européennes, sans qu’il y ait lieu de procéder à l’examen de sa situation individuelle.” No British national may be entered on the complementary rolls for municipal or European elections, with no individual examination of personal circumstances. It quashed the Auch tribunal’s judgment in full, “CASSE ET ANNULE, en toutes ses dispositions, le jugement rendu le 14 mai 2025, entre les parties, par le tribunal judiciaire d’Auch”, declared “DIT n’y avoir lieu à renvoi”, and “REJETTE la demande de Mme [U] tendant à l’annulation de la décision de rejet de réinscription sur la liste électorale de la commune de [Localité 5], pour les élections européennes”. The Court also explained why length of residence, farming under the common agricultural policy since 1984, and moral objections to naturalisation change nothing: the loss of Union citizenship “est une conséquence automatique de la seule décision prise souverainement par le Royaume-Uni de se retirer de l’Union, en vertu de l’article 50, paragraphe 1, TUE”, and “ni les autorités compétentes des États membres ni les juridictions de ceux-ci ne sauraient être tenues de procéder à un examen individuel des conséquences de la perte du statut de citoyen de l’Union pour la personne concernée, au regard du principe de proportionnalité”. No authority and no court owes you a personal proportionality assessment.

Two practical consequences follow. First, the only route back onto a French roll is French nationality itself: a British reader who becomes French votes as a French citizen on the main roll, with full rights in every election, municipal, parliamentary, presidential and European. Naturalisation, with its residence, language and assimilation conditions, is therefore also an electoral strategy, and our guide to British newcomers’ residence rights from visa to carte de séjour explains the residence foundation on which any later nationality application is built. Second, dual French-British nationals were never affected: holding French nationality, you register exactly like any French citizen. If you hold both passports and a mayor tells you otherwise, the challenge procedure in the next section is yours to use.

B. Refused or Removed from the French Roll? How to Challenge the Decision Step by Step

Even though British citizens cannot be entered on the rolls, the challenge machinery matters to you in three situations: you hold French nationality as well and are wrongly refused, you were wrongly removed, or you want to understand the deadlines because a spouse, child or neighbour is affected. French electoral litigation moves fast, with time limits counted in days, and missing one is usually fatal. Here is the chain exactly as the Code lays it down.

Everything starts with the mayor, the maire of your commune, or in Paris with the mayor of your arrondissement, since Paris, Lyon and Marseille keep one roll per arrondissement. Registration is on application, and Article L11 provides that “Sont inscrits sur la liste électorale de la commune, sur leur demande”, then sets the territorial tests: real domicile in the commune or six months’ residence there opens the door, and electors’ children under twenty-six follow them onto the same roll. The mayor checks the file and “Il statue sur cette demande dans un délai de cinq jours à compter de son dépôt.” Five days to decide. The same article organises removals, called radiation: “Le maire radie les électeurs qui ne remplissent plus aucune des conditions mentionnées au premier alinéa du présent I à l’issue d’une procédure contradictoire.” No one is struck off without first being heard. Every decision is notified within two days and sent to INSEE, the national statistics institute that holds the single national electoral register: “La liste électorale de la commune est extraite d’un répertoire électoral unique et permanent. Ce répertoire est tenu par l’Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques aux seules fins de gestion du processus électoral.” That is Article L16, and it explains why a removal in one commune follows you everywhere: the register is national.

If the mayor refuses or removes you, the first appeal is compulsory and administrative under Article L18: “Tout recours contentieux formé par l’électeur intéressé contre une décision prise au titre du présent article est précédé d’un recours administratif préalable, à peine d’irrecevabilité du recours contentieux. Ce recours administratif préalable est formé dans un délai de cinq jours à compter de la notification de la décision prévue au II du présent article.” Five days from notification to file the prior administrative appeal, the recours administratif préalable, on pain of inadmissibility of everything after. The appeal goes to the control commission, the commission de contrôle of Article L19: “Dans chaque commune ou, à Paris, Marseille et Lyon, dans chaque arrondissement, une commission de contrôle statue sur les recours administratifs préalables prévus au III de l’article L. 18.” That commission also polices the roll on its own motion. Up to the twenty-first day before polling day, a majority of its members may overturn the mayor’s decisions, add an omitted voter or remove a wrongly registered one, with a hearing before any removal: “Lorsqu’elle radie un électeur, sa décision est soumise à une procédure contradictoire.”

After the commission, the judge takes over, and this is the tribunal judiciaire, the ordinary civil court sitting as election judge. Article L20 gives two doors. The general door: “Tout électeur inscrit sur la liste électorale de la commune peut demander, auprès du tribunal judiciaire, l’inscription ou la radiation d’un électeur omis ou indûment inscrit ou contester la décision de radiation ou d’inscription d’un électeur.” Any registered elector, and the préfet, the State’s representative in the département, in every case, can ask the court to add, remove or correct an entry. “Le recours est formé dans un délai de sept jours à compter de la publication de la liste électorale. Le jugement du tribunal judiciaire, qui se prononce en dernier ressort dans un délai de huit jours à compter du recours, est notifié dans un délai de deux jours aux parties, au maire et à l’Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. Un pourvoi en cassation peut être formé contre ce jugement dans un délai de dix jours à compter de sa notification. Le pourvoi n’est pas suspensif.” Seven days to seize the court, eight days for a last-resort judgment, ten days for a cassation appeal that does not suspend. The emergency door stays open until polling day itself: “Toute personne qui prétend avoir été omise de la liste électorale de la commune en raison d’une erreur purement matérielle ou avoir été radiée en méconnaissance de l’article L. 18 peut saisir le tribunal judiciaire, qui a compétence pour statuer jusqu’au jour du scrutin.” A purely clerical omission or a removal in breach of the hearing requirement can be taken to the judge up to election day.

Three recent rulings show how courts actually use these texts, and each carries a lesson. First, the judge must examine the substance, not rubber-stamp the commission. On 13 March 2026 the Second Civil Chamber quashed a Gonesse proximity-court judgment that had upheld the removal of Mrs B., a Romanian national, from a complementary roll, because the lower court had merely noted she had not supplied an extra proof of address in time. The Cour de cassation recalled the test, “peuvent être inscrits sur une liste électorale complémentaire de la commune, sur leur demande, notamment, les citoyens de l’Union européenne résidant en France qui ont leur domicile réel dans la commune ou y habitent depuis six mois au moins”, and held: “En se déterminant ainsi, sans rechercher si Mme [B] répondait aux conditions prescrites par la loi pour être inscrite sur la liste électorale complémentaire de la commune de [Localité 1], le tribunal a privé sa décision de base légale.” Failure to check the legal conditions is a lack of legal basis, and the judgment was quashed in full: “CASSE ET ANNULE, en toutes ses dispositions, le jugement rendu le 5 mars 2026”. Read it here: Cass. Civ. 2e, 13 March 2026, No. 26-60.098. For EU-citizen readers, and for dual nationals, the message is that a removal letter demanding one more document does not end the story: the judge must verify domicile, residence and capacity. Second, mind who is allowed to appeal. On 10 June 2021 the same Chamber declared inadmissible a cassation appeal filed by a mayor in his official capacity: “le pourvoi en cassation contre le jugement statuant sur l’inscription d’un électeur sur la liste électorale de la commune ou sur sa radiation ne peut être formé que par les personnes ayant été parties à l’instance, limitativement énumérées, que sont l’électeur intéressé, tout électeur inscrit sur la liste considérée, ainsi que, dans tous les cas, le représentant de l’Etat dans le département. Il en découle que la commune n’a pas qualité pour former un pourvoi en cassation.” Only the voter concerned, a registered elector of the same roll, or the préfet may go to cassation; the commune as such may not, and the appeal was declared inadmissible: “DÉCLARE IRRECEVABLE le pourvoi.” See Cass. Civ. 2e, 10 June 2021, No. 21-60.115. If your mairie threatens to fight your registration up to Paris, know that the mairie itself has no ticket for that journey. Third, late registrations are possible in defined hardship cases. Article L30 lets certain voters register “entre le sixième vendredi précédant le scrutin et le dixième jour précédant ce scrutin”, between the sixth Friday before polling day and the tenth day before it: transferred civil servants and their families, demobilised soldiers, people who move commune for professional reasons after the deadline, young people who turn eighteen, and newly naturalised French citizens. A British reader who acquires French nationality just before an election should memorise that fourth category.

In practice, start online before you write any letter. The official English-language pages let you check your registration and polling station, file an online registration application with proof of identity and address, and read the rules for EU citizens voting in France and for registering and voting in the same year. Keep every notification letter with its date: your five-day administrative appeal runs from notification, and the commission that hears it must answer within thirty days, silence counting as a decision you can then take to the tribunal judiciaire. In the Paris region, the catchment courts are used to these cases, as the Gonesse and Pontoise litigation in Val-d’Oise shows. Act in days, not weeks.

II. How to Keep Voting in UK Elections While Living in France

The vote you keep is the British one, and since the old fifteen-year cut-off described in the Gers litigation belongs to the past, the current system is more generous than many long-settled residents realise. GOV.UK states the test without any time limit: British citizens who move or live abroad can register as overseas voters, provided they previously lived in the United Kingdom, with a parallel route for eligible Irish citizens registering in Northern Ireland. Previous UK residence plus British citizenship is the whole gateway; how many decades ago you left does not appear in the test. Registration or past residence, either suffices. What follows is the complete operating manual: the declaration, the renewal cycle, the three ways of casting the ballot, and the traps that remove you from the register.

A. Registering as an Overseas Voter: the Electoral Commission Test, the Declaration and Renewal

Registration runs through the ordinary register-to-vote service for England, Scotland and Wales, with a paper route through the Electoral Office for Northern Ireland, and full guidance sits on the official voting when living abroad pages . Full guidance sits on the official voting when living abroad pages. The service asks for a National Insurance number while allowing registration without one, and links your application to where you last lived in the United Kingdom, because everything afterwards, reminders, the polling station, the constituency, hangs off that last address. Give the most precise last address you can, including the postcode, and keep a copy of the declaration and every confirmation: three years later, at renewal, you will need the same facts again, and consistency across cycles is what keeps withdrawals and objections away. Treat any request for further evidence from the registration officer as urgent: the officer decides on the papers before them, and a thin file invites refusal.

The registration you obtain is not permanent. Renewal is required every three years to keep voting in UK elections, with a reminder from the registration office when the date approaches. The renewal runs through a dedicated renewal service with a nine-digit access code from the reminder letter or email, or by paper form if you cannot use the online service, and the sanction for letting it lapse is blunt: Failure to renew means removal from the register, after which a fresh overseas application is needed. Two administrative habits therefore protect your vote for life: tell the registration office whenever you change name, address or nationality, and renew on the reminder, not after. Diary the renewal alongside any postal or proxy arrangement so the whole bundle is checked together. For a household in France, put all British adults’ renewals on the same reminder and check them together each autumn.

Know also what this registration does not give. Registration as an overseas voter opens voting in UK Parliament elections. Westminster general elections, yes, plus by-elections for the Commons seat of your last address. Local council elections in England, devolved elections in Scotland and Wales, and Police and Crime Commissioner elections are not included, and referendums each set their own franchise: Referendums each set their own franchise, which may or may not include overseas voters. Do not assume that a future referendum copies the general-election franchise; read its instrument. If you cross the Channel on polling day, your polling station is the one attached to your last United Kingdom address. Otherwise your ballot travels by post or through your proxy.

B. Postal, Proxy or In-Person Votes: Deadlines, Evidence Requests and Keeping Your Registration Alive

Three channels exist, and the choice is tactical, especially from France where post between the two countries can be slow in holiday periods. For England, Scotland and Wales the three channels are postal voting, proxy voting where eligible, or voting in person. Postal voting sends a pack with your ballot paper to your French address ahead of polling day; you return it by post, and the return journey across the Channel is the weak link, so apply early in the regulated window and post back the same day you receive the pack. Proxy voting appoints a trusted person in Britain to cast your ballot; from France a proxy is often the safer option because it removes the cross-border postal gamble entirely. In-person voting means presenting yourself at the polling station of your last UK address, or the station covering where you used to live if you were never registered there, with the modern formality strictly enforced, with photographic identification required to confirm identity. Bring identification and check the accepted list before you fly, because an election-day refusal at the desk has almost no remedy in the hours left.

Northern Ireland follows stricter channels: proxy or in person only. For Northern Ireland only proxy or in-person voting is available, with no postal voting. Readers whose last UK home was in Belfast or Derry should therefore organise a proxy now rather than discovering the postal ban during an election campaign.

Each channel needs its own application on top of the overseas registration: Apply for the absent vote alongside the registration itself and confirm that both are granted; a registered overseas voter with no confirmed postal or proxy arrangement who is sitting in Lyon on polling day has no usable vote. When the registration officer queries your file, answer with documents, not indignation: proof of the last UK address, passport details, National Insurance number and a clear statement of whether you rely on past registration or past residence. Keep copies of the declaration and every confirmation email, because three years later, at renewal, you will need the same facts again, and consistency across cycles is what keeps withdrawals and objections away. If an application is refused, ask for written reasons, cure the precise defect identified, and re-apply within the election timetable rather than arguing the principle by email: the timetable, unlike the officer, does not wait.

One final cross-border warning. Voting in the United Kingdom does not affect your French residence, tax or healthcare position, and voting or not voting has no bearing on a Withdrawal Agreement residence permit. Conversely, holding a French carte de séjour does not give you a French vote, as Part I showed. The two systems are hermetic: organise each on its own rules, keep the renewal dates of the British declaration alongside the expiry date of your French residence documents, and no election on either side of the Channel will ever catch you unregistered.

Conclusion

Brexit redrew your electoral map with a hard line. In France, the complementary rolls are closed to British nationals for municipal and European elections, the Cour de cassation has rejected every challenge, from Mr O. of Le Dorat in 2020 to Mrs U. of the Gers in 2025, Luxembourg has confirmed the reading twice, and no court owes you an individual proportionality assessment. The only French ballot available is the one that comes with French nationality. In Britain, the mirror image applies: previous UK residence plus British citizenship opens registration as an overseas voter with no time limit in the current test, renewed every three years, exercisable for Westminster by post, by proxy or in person with photo ID, at the polling station of your last United Kingdom address. Check your French position on service-public.fr if you hold French nationality, register or renew your British overseas declaration before the next UK poll is called, appoint a proxy if your French post is slow, and keep every decision letter: in electoral law, on both sides of the Channel, the voter who acts within days keeps rights the voter who waits loses.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
2 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago