Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Getting Married in France from the UK After Brexit: the Self-Declaration, the Bans and How to Challenge a Refusal

Every month, British couples type the same hopeful questions into Google: getting married in France from the UK, getting married in France as a UK citizen, getting married in France to a French citizen. The dream is a chateau wedding in the Dordogne or a quiet ceremony at the local mairie, the town hall. The trap is believing that a romantic blessing, a humanist ceremony or a religious service makes you married in the eyes of French law. It does not. In France, only the civil ceremony celebrated by the officier de l’état civil, the civil registrar, creates a marriage, and everything else, however beautiful, is legally invisible until that ceremony has taken place. Since Brexit, British nationals marry in France as third-country nationals, which changes the paperwork in one decisive way: the United Kingdom issues no certificate of no impediment and no certificat de coutume, the certificate of custom that French town halls routinely demand from foreigners, so Britons must use a specific self-declaration procedure instead. This article explains the full procedure as it stands in October 2026: which commune can marry you and after how much residence, which documents to assemble and in which order, what happens on the day, which property regime applies by default, and what to do when the registrar or the prosecutor says no. It is written for British readers in plain English with UK spelling, and every French legal term is explained when it first appears. The statutory quotations are given word for word from the official texts, and the case law comes from two verified decisions of the Court of Cassation, the Cour de cassation, France’s supreme court for civil matters.

I. Getting married in France as a UK citizen: where to marry and which papers to bring

A. Getting married in France from the UK: the commune, the residence rule and the British self-declaration

The first question is geographical: not every town hall can marry you. Article 74 of the Civil Code provides that « Le mariage sera célébré, au choix des époux, dans la commune où l’un d’eux, ou l’un de leurs parents, aura son domicile ou sa résidence établie par un mois au moins d’habitation continue à la date de la publication prévue par la loi. » In ordinary English: you may marry in the commune where either of you, or a parent of either of you, has a home or has lived continuously for at least one month on the date the bans are published. The domicile is your principal and permanent home; the résidence is where you actually live, even on a temporary basis. For a British couple flying in for the wedding, the practical routes are therefore three: one of you already lives in France, one of you moves there at least a month before the file is lodged, or a parent living in France lends you their commune. The official English-language page of the French public service confirms the rule in these terms on its official English-language marriage page: residence must be established by at least one month of continuous living on the date the bans are published, proved by a bill in your name such as an energy invoice, a rent receipt or home insurance. The British government’s own guidance phrases the requirement as at least 40 days’ living in the town before the ceremony, which is best read as a safety margin over the statutory month: satisfy the longer period and nobody can dispute the shorter one. A religious or humanist celebration can only follow the civil ceremony, never replace it, and venues that sell wedding packages cannot confer a legal status the registrar has not pronounced.

The second question is documentary, and this is where British couples differ from almost every other nationality. French registrars normally ask foreigners for a certificat de célibat, a certificate of single status, and a certificat de coutume, a certificate describing the marriage law of your country. The British government’s guidance, on its page for the self-declaration form for marriage in France, states the position bluntly: no certificate of no impediment is issued by the UK government for France-bound weddings, because no such document exists for France-bound weddings. Instead, the town hall may ask you for a certificat de célibat or a certificat de coutume, and since British nationals cannot obtain these certificates, they may instead submit a self-declaration form stating they are free to marry or register a PACS, together with the official explanatory note. The procedure runs in six practical steps: print the self-declaration form and the explanatory note that stands in for the missing certificates, fill the form in without signing it, ask the town hall whether your signature must be legalised, meaning certified as genuine, and if so have a local notaire, a French public-officer lawyer specialised in family and property matters, certify it, gather evidence of any change of name such as a deed poll where your passport and birth certificate differ, then submit everything at the town-hall appointment and sign the form there if no prior legalisation was needed. Where both partners are British, each of you completes the full set. The same guidance reassures couples about recognition back home: the marriage or PACS will be recognised in the United Kingdom where the couple followed the correct French process and the union would be allowed under UK law. A PACS, the pacte civil de solidarité, is France’s registered civil partnership, a lighter status than marriage that some couples choose as a first step, and it follows the same self-declaration logic at the town hall.

Alongside the self-declaration, each of you must produce the standard marriage file. Article 70 of the Civil Code requires that “Chacun des futurs époux remet à l’officier de l’état civil qui doit célébrer le mariage l’extrait avec indication de la filiation de son acte de naissance”, an extract of your birth record showing parentage. Where the birth record was drawn up by a French registrar it must be less than three months old, but a British birth certificate is issued abroad, and the public-service guidance sets the foreign rule: a birth certificate with parentage details no more than six months old, counted from the day you lodge the marriage file, not from the wedding day, because lodging the file triggers the publication of the bans. Two British particularities follow. First, the United Kingdom does not update birth certificates with later events such as marriage or divorce, so no time limit applies to a British certificate, provided you attach a written statement from the embassy, the consulate or another authorised authority of your country confirming that no updating system exists. In practice, order a certified copy from the General Register Office, add that statement, and have both rendered into French by a traducteur assermenté, a translator sworn before a French court of appeal, because any document in a foreign language must be translated by such a sworn translator, although a multilingual extract can sometimes be accepted as it stands. Second, depending on the country of origin, the guidance warns that an apostille, the Hague Convention stamp that authenticates a public document for use abroad, or full consular légalisation may also be required. The United Kingdom is party to the Hague Apostille Convention, so a British birth certificate is authenticated with an apostille from the UK Legalisation Office, not with consular legalisation, and the apostille itself should be translated. Add proof of identity, meaning a passport, proof of address or residence, the full details of your witnesses, and, where relevant, the death certificate of a former spouse or the divorce decree absolute proving you are free to remarry. If either of you was divorced in England, bring the decree absolute with its apostille and sworn translation, since the registrar must see that the previous marriage is definitively dissolved.

Once the file is lodged, the registrar publishes the bans, the publication des bans, a public notice of your intended marriage. Article 63 of the Civil Code organises the whole preliminary stage: before the celebration, the registrar posts the notice at the door of the town hall, collects for each of you the documents required by Articles 70 and 71, proof of identity issued by a public authority, and the full details of the witnesses, and then, as a rule, hears both of you together. That joint hearing, the audition commune des futurs époux, may be skipped only where it is impossible or where the file shows it is unnecessary in light of Articles 146 and 180, the consent provisions. Where the registrar has reasons to fear, from the documents, the joint hearing or substantiated outside information that is not anonymous, that the planned marriage might be annulled for lack of genuine consent, the registrar must interview each of you separately, and where one of you lives abroad, the hearing can be conducted through the diplomatic or consular authority. British couples with a genuine relationship and a coherent file have nothing to fear from this hearing, but they should treat it as a real appointment: inconsistent answers about how you met, where you live or what you plan after the wedding are exactly what triggers deeper checks. Article 64 then sets the clock: « L’affiche prévue à l’article précédent restera apposée à la porte de la maison commune pendant dix jours. Le mariage ne pourra être célébré avant le dixième jour depuis et non compris celui de la publication. » Ten full days of posting, and no ceremony before the eleventh day. Only the procureur de la République, the public prosecutor for the district, can waive publication and waiting periods, and Article 169 allows that waiver « pour des causes graves », for serious reasons only, such as a terminal illness or an imminent posting abroad, never for mere convenience or a photographer already booked.

B. The ceremony at the mairie: what the registrar pronounces and which property regime you wake up in

French marriage is open to every adult couple. Article 143 of the Civil Code states that « Le mariage est contracté par deux personnes de sexe différent ou de même sexe. » Since the statute of 17 May 2013, same-sex couples marry under exactly the same rules, and a British same-sex couple is married in France on the same terms as any other. Article 144 fixes the threshold of adulthood: « Le mariage ne peut être contracté avant dix-huit ans révolus. » No marriage before the eighteenth birthday, with only narrow prosecutorial dispensations for grave reasons. The ceremony itself is a republican civil act. Article 165 provides that « Le mariage sera célébré publiquement lors d’une cérémonie républicaine par l’officier de l’état civil de la commune », publicly, in a republican ceremony, before the registrar of the commune identified under Article 74. Public means the doors are open: anyone may attend, and anyone entitled to object may do so. The registrar reads the key articles on the rights and duties of spouses, receives your consent in the presence of at least two and at most four adult witnesses, and pronounces you united in marriage. The acte de mariage, the marriage record, is drawn up immediately, and Article 76 lists what it must state, including your full identities, those of your parents, the parental consents where required, and, crucially, whether a marriage contract was signed. You leave with a livret de famille, the family record book in which later births and deaths will be entered, a document French administrations will ask for again and again.

The sentence the registrar reads about your property regime deserves your full attention before the day, not after. If you sign nothing, you are automatically married under the communauté réduite aux acquêts, the statutory community of after-acquired property. Article 1400 of the Civil Code states that « La communauté, qui s’établit à défaut de contrat ou par la simple déclaration qu’on se marie sous le régime de la communauté, est soumise aux règles expliquées dans les trois sections qui suivent. » In practice, what either of you owned before the wedding or receives later by gift or inheritance stays personal, while earnings, savings and property bought during the marriage fall into the common pot, divided equally on divorce or death. For many British couples this default works well, but couples with a business, children from a previous relationship, a large premarital portfolio or a strong wish to keep finances separate should see a notaire before the wedding about a contrat de mariage, a notarised marriage contract opting for separation of property or a tailored community. Article 1394 requires that “Toutes les conventions matrimoniales seront rédigées par acte devant notaire”, every marriage contract be drawn up by notarial deed in the simultaneous presence of the parties, and the notary issues a certificate you hand to the registrar so the contract is mentioned in the marriage record. An English prenuptial agreement, however carefully drafted in London, is not a French contrat de mariage and does not bind a French court dividing French assets, a point developed in our guide to which matrimonial regime owns a British couple’s French house. One final British detail: marriage does not change your surname in French law. Either spouse may use the other’s name in daily life as a nom d’usage, a name used by custom, which can be entered on passports and identity documents, but your birth name, your nom de naissance, remains your only legal family name unless you go through a formal change-of-name procedure.

II. Getting married in France to a French citizen: refusals, binational rules and the wedding abroad that still needs France

A. When the registrar or the prosecutor objects: consent, sham-marriage controls and how to challenge a refusal

Couples in which one partner is French and the other British, getting married in France to a French citizen in Google’s wording, face one extra layer of law: each of you brings your own national law to the ceremony. Article 202-1 of the Civil Code provides that “Les qualités et conditions requises pour pouvoir contracter mariage sont régies, pour chacun des époux, par sa loi personnelle.” Capacity, minimum age and impediments such as an undissolved previous marriage are therefore judged for the British partner under English, Scottish or Northern Irish law, and for the French partner under French law. But there is a floor no national law can remove. The Court of Cassation recalled it word for word in a published decision of 18 May 2022, appeal number 21-11.106: « Aux termes de l’article 202-1 du code civil, les qualités et conditions requises pour pouvoir contracter mariage sont régies, pour chacun des époux, par sa loi personnelle. Quelle que soit la loi personnelle applicable, le mariage requiert le consentement des époux, au sens de l’article 146 et du premier alinéa de l’article 180. » Whatever your nationalities, the marriage requires both spouses’ consent within the meaning of Articles 146 and 180. Article 146 is the shortest and sternest sentence in French family law: « Il n’y a pas de mariage lorsqu’il n’y a point de consentement. » No consent, no marriage. Article 180 draws the consequences: a marriage contracted without the free consent of both spouses or of one of them can be attacked by the spouses, by the one whose consent was not free, or by the public prosecutor, and pressure exerted on either spouse, including awe-inspired fear of a parent, the crainte révérencielle envers un ascendant, counts as a ground of nullity. Forced marriage is therefore not a private misfortune but a cause of annulment the prosecutor can pursue, and registrars are trained to detect it at the preliminary hearing.

The same machinery polices sham marriages, the mariages blancs contracted for a residence permit rather than a shared life, and the mariages gris where one spouse’s feelings are genuine and the other’s are feigned. Where the file, the joint hearing, the separate interviews or substantiated outside reports give the registrar serious indications that the marriage could be annulled for lack of real consent, Article 175-2 of the Civil Code orders the registrar to act: « Lorsqu’il existe des indices sérieux laissant présumer, le cas échéant au vu de l’audition ou des entretiens individuels mentionnés à l’article 63 , que le mariage envisagé est susceptible d’être annulé au titre de l’article 146 ou de l’article 180 , l’officier de l’état civil saisit sans délai le procureur de la République. Il en informe les intéressés. » The registrar refers the file to the prosecutor immediately and tells you so. The prosecutor must then decide within fifteen days, and the statute lists exactly three options: « Le procureur de la République est tenu, dans les quinze jours de sa saisine, soit de laisser procéder au mariage, soit de faire opposition à celui-ci, soit de décider qu’il sera sursis à sa célébration, dans l’attente des résultats de l’enquête à laquelle il fait procéder. » Allow the wedding, formally oppose it through an opposition à mariage, or suspend it while an enquiry is carried out, with a reasoned decision sent to the registrar. An opposition is not the end of the road. The public-service guidance explains that opponents must state their identity and elect an address, an élection de domicile, in the marriage commune, and that the court competent to lift the opposition, the mainlevée de l’opposition, is either the court of the marriage commune or the court of the opponent’s real domicile. In practice, your lawyer seises the tribunal judiciaire, the ordinary civil court, for an order lifting the block, and the judge examines whether the serious indications genuinely establish a lack of matrimonial intent or merely an unusual but sincere story: a large age gap, a common language barely shared, or a visa expiring next month invite questions, but none of them proves simulation by itself. Keep every trace of real shared life from the start, meaning joint tenancy agreements, travel together, photographs with each other’s families, money transfers for the household and consistent statements, because the file you build before the hearing is the evidence the judge will read if the prosecutor objects. Where the difficulty is simpler, a missing document rather than suspected fraud, the remedy is administrative: complete the file, ask the registrar in writing which exact item is lacking and on which legal basis, and only then consider a court application, since judges lift oppositions but do not print birth certificates.

B. Married in Gretna Green or London first: transcription, the spouse’s residence permit and the Paris consequences

Some couples take the other road: a quick civil wedding in the United Kingdom, then life in France. That wedding is valid in France if it was valid where celebrated, but it produces effects in France only once transcribed, and transcription is a control, not a rubber stamp. The trap is the fashionable shortcut of marrying without both partners present, by proxy, by video link or through an officiant who promises a marriage without travelling. For a French spouse that shortcut is worthless. The Court of Cassation held on 25 March 2026, in appeal number 24-16.383 concerning a marriage celebrated in Senegal: « Aux termes de l’article 146-1 du code civil, le mariage d’un Français, même contracté à l’étranger, requiert sa présence. » A French national’s marriage, even contracted abroad, requires their presence. The same decision quotes the transcription safeguard: « Selon l’article 171-7 du même code, lorsque des indices sérieux laissent présumer que le mariage célébré devant une autorité étrangère encourt la nullité au titre de l’article 146-1, l’autorité diplomatique ou consulaire chargée de transcrire l’acte en informe immédiatement le ministère public et sursoit à la transcription. » Where serious indications suggest the foreign marriage could be annulled, the consulate tells the prosecution service at once and freezes transcription. The prosecutor then has six months to decide, and if the prosecutor stays silent or opposes transcription, the couple may seise the tribunal judiciaire, which rules within a month, the court of appeal deciding within the same period on appeal. A British-French couple married in the United Kingdom should therefore apply for transcription at the French consulate with the full British file, apostilled marriage certificate, sworn translation, proof of the French spouse’s capacity, and patience: until transcription, the French spouse is still single in the eyes of the French civil register, and administrations will treat you accordingly. Article 146-1 and Article 171-7 of the Civil Code carry the whole mechanism.

Once married and transcribed, the British spouse’s residence position becomes one of the strongest in French immigration law. Article L. 423-1 of the Code on the Entry and Residence of Foreigners and Asylum provides that “L’étranger marié avec un ressortissant français, se voit délivrer une carte de séjour temporaire portant la mention ” vie privée et familiale ” d’une durée d’un an lorsque les conditions suivantes sont réunies : 1° La communauté de vie n’a pas cessé depuis le mariage ; 2° Le conjoint a conservé la nationalité française ; 3° Lorsque le mariage a été célébré à l’étranger, il a été transcrit préalablement sur les registres de l’état civil français.” A foreigner married to a French national receives a one-year temporary residence card marked vie privée et familiale, private and family life, provided the shared life has continued since the wedding, the spouse is still French, and a wedding celebrated abroad has first been transcribed. Note the three fragilities Britons underestimate: entry must have been lawful, the shared life must be genuine and continuing, and spouses who married abroad and skipped transcription have no card until the register is fixed. Renewal leads in time to a multi-year card and then to a ten-year resident card, and the spouse route is far more protective than the visitor route many retirees start with. Where the British spouse already holds a Withdrawal Agreement card or another status, take advice before switching statuses, and where the prefecture refuses or withdraws the card, the refusal can be challenged before the administrative court, like any residence refusal. Couples who married two Britons in France follow the ordinary foreign-resident rules instead, explained in our newcomer visa guide, while the marriage itself remains fully valid.

Marriage also rewires money and property, and the Paris region adds its own practical layer. On the property side, the default community described above now governs everything the couple earns and buys, which is why couples who bought a flat as concubins, unmarried partners, or under a PACS before the wedding should review who owns what with their notaire in the months after the ceremony. Our analyses of matrimonial regimes for British couples in France and of divorce and recognition of English orders after Brexit take over where this article stops. On the tax side, marriage creates a single French tax household, the foyer fiscal, with joint assessment from the wedding year, and surviving spouses enjoy a full exemption from French inheritance tax, the droits de succession, on what they inherit from each other, which makes marriage the simplest protective wrapper for the family home. For the Paris and Ile-de-France specifics: celebrate where the residence rule points you, but remember that Parisian town halls, the mairies d’arrondissement, operate strictly by appointment with complete files and waiting lists of several months in wedding season, so lodge early; notaries in Paris routinely draft marriage contracts in English alongside the French original for binational couples; and where one spouse works in London while the couple lives in France, the cross-border tax and social-security position needs a separate review, since marriage changes the family status but not the treaty rules on where each income is taxed. Keep certified copies of everything, the acte de mariage, the contract certificate, the transcription mention and the residence card, because French administrations ask for the same proofs at every stage, from health cover to property purchase to school enrolment.

Conclusion

Marrying in France as a British citizen after Brexit is entirely possible, but it rewards couples who prepare like applicants, not like guests. Choose the commune under Article 74 and secure the one month of continuous residence before the bans are published. Build the file in the British order: General Register Office birth certificate with the no-updating statement, apostille, sworn translation, passport, proofs of address, divorce or death evidence where relevant, and, in place of the unobtainable certificate of no impediment and certificate of custom, the self-declaration form with its explanatory note, signed at the town hall or legalised before a notary as your mairie requires. Respect the ten-day posting of the bans, attend the joint hearing with a coherent story, and sign nothing about property without understanding that silence means statutory community under Article 1400. Where the registrar hesitates or the prosecutor opposes, remember that consent is the only absolute requirement under Articles 146 and 202-1, that opposition is challenged by lifting proceedings before the civil court, and that a wedding celebrated in the United Kingdom counts in France only after transcription, with the French spouse’s presence mandatory under Article 146-1. Marry in the right commune, on the right papers, under the right regime, and the chateau party afterwards will celebrate a marriage France fully recognises, from the livret de famille to the spouse’s residence card to the tax household you will form together.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
2 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago