Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Resident in France After Brexit: Filing Your First French Tax Return — UK Pension, Rental Income, Bank Accounts and How to Challenge the Bill

Your first French tax return as a British resident after Brexit is the moment your move becomes real for the French tax office. The year you settle in France, you must tell the Direction générale des finances publiques (the French tax administration) who you are, where you live, and what you earn everywhere in the world — including your UK pension, any rent from a property you kept in Britain, interest from a British bank account, and the very existence of that account. British newcomers regularly get three things wrong: they assume their Withdrawal Agreement residence card settles their tax position, they declare only their French-source income, and they forget the separate form that lists every bank account held abroad. Each of these mistakes carries its own price, from late-filing surcharges to a fixed fine per undeclared account. This guide explains, step by step, how to file your first French return correctly: first, whether France treats you as a tax resident and which three forms you must complete; second, how the France–United Kingdom double tax treaty allocates each type of British income and how to challenge a bill you consider wrong. Every rule below is drawn from official sources — the tax code, the treaty text, the administration’s own guidance pages, and court decisions you can read in full.

I. Are you a French tax resident and what exactly must you declare?

Before any figure goes on any form, one preliminary question decides everything: does France regard you as one of its tax residents? The answer determines whether you declare your worldwide income in France or only your French-source income, which forms you file, and which treaty protections you can claim. British citizens often confuse immigration status with tax status. They are two separate legal worlds.

A. How France decides that a British newcomer is one of its tax residents?

French tax residence — the domicile fiscal — is defined by Article 4 B of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts): you are a French tax resident if your home (foyer) is in France, if you spend your main period of physical presence there, if you carry on a professional activity there, or if the centre of your economic interests is there. A single one of these four tests is enough. The first test, the foyer, looks at where you habitually live with your family; the courts give it a factual reading, checking school enrolment, utility bills, club memberships and the pattern of your travel, rather than accepting a declaration of intent at face value.

The Cour de cassation applies these tests strictly, and it does so against taxpayers who believed their paperwork abroad protected them. In a widely noted wealth-tax dispute, the court recorded that “Selon l’arrêt attaqué (Reims, 4 décembre 2018), l’administration fiscale a notifié à M. [I] et son épouse, Mme [Y], (M. et Mme [I]) une proposition de rectification de leur impôt de solidarité sur la fortune (ISF), au titre des années 2007 et 2008” after they claimed Swiss tax residence, and it upheld the French reassessment on the facts of their real life rather than on their stated choice of residence (Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 24 November 2021, appeal no. 19-14.013). The lesson for a British household is direct: keeping a UK address, a British driving licence or even days counted carefully across the Channel does not by itself defeat French tax residence if your family home, your daily life and your economic centre have moved to France.

Three misunderstandings need clearing up at once. First, your Withdrawal Agreement residence card (the WARP card) proves a right to live in France; it neither creates nor excludes tax residence. Second, spending fewer than 183 days in France does not automatically keep you non-resident: the foyer test and the professional-activity test apply regardless of day counts. Third, owning or renting a home in France that you present as a mere holiday home can still tip the balance if the administration shows that your habitual abode is in fact there. Once France treats you as resident, Article 4 A of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts) makes you liable to French income tax on all of your income, French and foreign alike — which is why the declaration forms for foreign income and foreign accounts matter so much.

The declaration duty itself sits in Article 170 of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts): every tax household (foyer fiscal) must file an annual return of the previous year’s income within the statutory deadline, online by default through your personal space on impots.gouv.fr. For a first arrival, the practical step that many British newcomers miss is creating that online space early and requesting the paper forms as a fallback: the main return form 2042, its foreign-income supplement form 2047, and the foreign-account statement form 3916. Filing only the 2042 while holding British income or British accounts is the single most common first-year error, and it is the error the administration’s computers are best equipped to detect through automatic exchange of information between the United Kingdom and France.

B. Which three forms carry your British income and your British accounts?

Your first French return as a British resident normally rests on three documents. Form 2042 is the main return: it carries your identity, your household composition, your address on 1 January of the tax year, and your total taxable income by category. Form 2047 is the supplement for income received abroad: the administration describes it exactly as the “declaration des revenus encaisses a l’etranger” (form 2047 on impots.gouv.fr), and it is here — not on the 2042 alone — that you itemise your UK pension, UK rental profits, UK bank interest and UK dividends, country by country, before the totals flow back onto the main return. Form 3916 is the separate statement of bank accounts and life-insurance contracts opened, held, used or closed abroad during the year: every British current account, savings account, ISA-linked cash account and investment platform account must appear on it, even an account that earned nothing and even one you closed mid-year.

The 3916 deserves special attention because its sanction is automatic and per account. The administration’s official guidance states the rule plainly in the tax code itself: undeclared accounts “sont passibles d’une amende de 1 500 € par compte ou avance non déclaré. Toutefois, pour l’infraction aux dispositions du deuxième alinéa de l’article 1649 A, ce montant est porté à 10 000 € par compte non déclaré lorsque l’obligation déclarative concerne un Etat ou un territoire qui n’a pas conclu avec la France une convention d’assistance administrative en vue de lutter contre la fraude et l’évasion fiscales permettant l’accès aux renseignements bancaires” (article 1736 of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts); see also service-public.gouv.fr, declaring accounts opened abroad). The United Kingdom has a full assistance convention with France, so the standard exposure is 1,500 euros per omitted British account — but three forgotten accounts mean 4,500 euros, and the same guidance adds a steep proportional increase of the duties at stake, which then replaces the fixed fine. Under the declaration duty of Article 1649 A, taxpayers “sont tenues de déclarer, en même temps que leur déclaration de revenus ou de résultats, les références des comptes ouverts, détenus, utilisés ou clos à l’étranger”. The legal basis for these fines is Article 1736 of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts), combined with the declaration duty of Article 1649 A of the General Tax Code (Code général des impôts).

The courts show no indulgence for taxpayers who held foreign accounts and stayed silent. In a February 2025 judgment, the Nancy court set out the typical pattern without ambiguity: “l’administration fiscale a constaté que M. [F] [D] était titulaire de deux comptes bancaires au Luxembourg, qu’il n’avait pas déclarés” — the administration had found two undeclared Luxembourg accounts — and the case then turned on demands for justification of the funds, taxation of unexplained balances at the top gift-tax rate, and the full machinery of reassessment (Tribunal judiciaire de Nancy, 27 February 2025, RG 23/00348). Luxembourg, like the United Kingdom, cooperates with France on tax information; the exchange that exposed those accounts works identically for a Barclays, HSBC or Lloyds account. Declare every account in year one, however small the balance, because the administration learns of it sooner or later and the fine runs per account.

Deadlines and late-filing surcharges complete the first-year picture. Online filing deadlines fall in May and June according to the department of residence — Paris and the inner suburbs traditionally close last — and missing them triggers Late-filing surcharges apply on a rising scale: 10 per cent for simple delay for simple delay, 20 per cent after a formal demand (mise en demeure) goes unanswered, and 40 per cent for a deliberate failure. A related trap concerns the return for the year of arrival itself: you file in France only the income of the period after you became resident, but you must still complete the foreign supplement and the foreign-account statement for that period. Finally, keep every British P60, P45, pension payslip, letting statement and bank certificate for at least the reassessment period — the administration may ask for the origin of any sum, as the Nancy case demonstrates, and a tidy file prepared in year one is your cheapest form of insurance.

II. How is each type of British income taxed and how do you challenge the bill?

Declaring is only half the job; the other half is making sure France taxes each item at the right rate, in the right category, with the right treaty relief — and knowing the procedure when the assessment notice (avis d’imposition) looks wrong. The 2008 France–United Kingdom double tax convention, in force and published by the British government, allocates taxing rights between the two states article by article, and France then applies its own scale, allowances and social levies within the space the treaty leaves it. Errors are frequent on pension classification, on rental-income credits, and on social charges — all three are worth checking line by line.

A. What does the treaty say about your UK pension, your UK rent and your social charges?

Start with the pension most British retirees live on: the regular occupational or personal pension paid for past employment. Article 18 of the 2008 convention reserves ordinary pensions paid for past employment to the state of residence alone, so a British pensioner resident in France is taxable in France on that pension and not in the United Kingdom (2008 UK–France Double Taxation Convention, official GOV.UK text, Articles 18 and 19). In plain terms, if you are resident in France, France alone taxes your ordinary British pension, and the United Kingdom must step back. France then taxes it as pension income with the standard 10 per cent allowance, and the gross amount converted into euros goes through form 2047 onto the 2042. The companion rule that British former public servants must memorise is that Article 19, paragraph 2 keeps the mirror rule for public-service pensions. A Crown pension for British government service therefore stays taxable only in the United Kingdom — unless you are both a French resident and a French national without British nationality, in which case France takes over. Misclassifying a Crown pension as an ordinary pension, or vice versa, is one of the costliest first-year mistakes, and it is worth a dedicated analysis for anyone with mixed service history (see our detailed pension guide, British Pension in France: the 25% Tax-Free Lump Sum France Still Taxes and the Crown Pensions France Cannot Tax).

Rental income from a property kept in Britain follows the opposite logic. Article 6, paragraph 1 of the convention lets the state where the property sits tax the rental income first. The United Kingdom therefore taxes the rent first under its own rules, and France, as your state of residence, includes the same rent in your taxable base but must eliminate the resulting double taxation under Article 24 of the convention — for French residents, by granting a tax credit equal to the French tax attributable to the British rent. The practical consequence is that you declare the gross UK rent on form 2047 with the British tax paid, and you verify on the French assessment that the credit has actually been applied at the right amount. When the credit is missing or short, the French bill is wrong by exactly that sum, and the remedy is a claim, not a shrug.

Social charges — the CSG (contribution sociale généralisée) and CRDS (contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale) on investment and property income — are the third item to check, and the one where European law repeatedly proves taxpayers right. The principle, settled after the de Ruyter line of cases and confirmed in later French litigation, is that a person affiliated to the social-security scheme of another state cannot simultaneously be charged French social levies that finance French social-security branches. The Cour de cassation keeps refining this boundary: in a September 2025 decision concerning a person “domiciliée en France et travaillant en Suisse”, who had “demandé le 2 juillet 2019” to the URSSAF the refund of contributions paid since 2015, the court examined precisely which levies finance compulsory French schemes and which fall inside European coordination rules (Cour de cassation, second civil chamber, 25 September 2025, appeal no. 22-24.634). For a British resident holding an S1 certificate of health cover or affiliated in the United Kingdom, the parallel question is live: CSG and CRDS charged on UK rental income or investment gains may be recoverable, and the claim follows the same refund route as any tax dispute. The legal anchor for the levies is Article L. 136-6 of the Social Security Code (Code de la sécurité sociale), and any exemption must be argued against that text with proof of foreign affiliation attached.

A final classification point before turning to remedies: British bank interest and dividends declared on form 2047 enter the French system at the flat rate (prélèvement forfaitaire unique) of 30 per cent including social charges, unless you elect for the progressive scale — an election worth modelling when your overall income is modest. Currency conversion uses the rate at the date of receipt, and the figures must reconcile across forms: the pension on the 2047, the totals on the 2042, the accounts on the 3916. Inconsistency between the three is the fastest route to an automated query, and consistency is entirely within your control.

B. How do you correct a return, claim a refund and take a dispute to court?

French tax procedure gives you a clear ladder: correct, claim, litigate — each rung with its own deadline. Start with correction. A return filed online can be corrected online during the corrective window that reopens in August after the spring campaign, and a paper correction remains possible by letter to your tax office (service des impôts des particuliers). If the assessment notice has already arrived and something is wrong — a missing treaty credit on UK rent, a Crown pension taxed as an ordinary pension, CSG charged despite an S1, a pension allowance forgotten — the remedy is the formal claim (réclamation) governed by Articles L. 190 and R. 190-1 of the Tax Procedure Book (Livre des procédures fiscales). The administration’s own guidance is framed by the contentious-procedure rule: “Les réclamations relatives aux impôts, contributions, droits, taxes, redevances, soultes et pénalités de toute nature, établis ou recouvrés par les agents de l’administration, relèvent de la juridiction contentieuse lorsqu’elles tendent à obtenir soit la réparation d’erreurs commises dans l’assiette ou le calcul des impositions, soit le bénéfice d’un droit résultant d’une disposition législative ou réglementaire.” (article L. 190 of the Tax Procedure Book (Livre des procédures fiscales)). The administration’s own guidance sets the practical tone: six months of silence or an unsatisfactory reply opens the door to the court (service-public.gouv.fr, tax claims and legal remedies). For income tax assessed in 2026, the guidance gives the concrete marker of 31 December 2028. File the claim online from your impots.gouv.fr space wherever possible, attach the treaty article, the British payslip or P60, the S1 certificate or the letting accounts, and state the exact sum claimed with its calculation — a claim that merely complains, without figures or documents, is routinely rejected.

Silence has a legal meaning, and it works in your favour. The administration must decide within six months: the administration must decide within six months of receiving the claim, Once that period expires without an answer, the silence counts as an implied rejection (rejet implicite), which opens the door to the administrative court. Filing the claim does not suspend collection — the tax remains payable in the meantime — but you can apply separately for deferred payment (sursis de paiement) with guarantees, so that enforcement is paused while the dispute runs. Interest for late payment (intérêt de retard) accrues mechanically, but it is reduced or cancelled when the claim succeeds, and the court can also award costs. Keep proof of every filing date: the six-month clock and the court deadline both run from dated events, and an undated claim is a procedural gift to the other side.

If the claim fails, the dispute moves to the administrative court (tribunal administratif) under Article R. 199-1 of the Tax Procedure Book (Livre des procédures fiscales): two months from express rejection, or from the expiry of the six-month silence period. For residents of Paris, that is the Paris administrative court; residents of Seine-Saint-Denis, Val-de-Marne and parts of the east go to Montreuil, and Hauts-de-Seine, Val-d’Oise and Yvelines to Cergy-Pontoise — so an address in Boulogne-Billancourt and an address in Saint-Denis do not lead to the same courtroom. The application must identify the tax, the year, the amount, the legal grounds and the evidence; representation by a lawyer is not compulsory at first instance but is strongly advisable once treaty interpretation or European social-security coordination is in play. Appeals go to the administrative court of appeal, and points of law to the Conseil d’État, whose tax chamber decides many treaty cases each year — including, in a September 2026 ruling on cross-border health cover that illustrates how seriously French courts take European coordination arguments, a cassation that sent the parties back for a fuller analysis (Cour de cassation, second civil chamber, 24 September 2026, appeal no. 23-19.562). A parallel lesson comes from declaration litigation itself: the Chambéry court of appeal dealt in September 2026 with a dispute turning on the taxpayer’s declaration duties and the resulting sanctions, a reminder that courts examine who declared what, and when, before reaching the substance (Court of Appeal of Chambéry, 8 September 2026, RG 23/01392).

Two practical warnings close the procedure. First, never ignore a reassessment proposal (proposition de rectification): you have thirty days to respond, extendable on request, and silence at that stage forfeits your best opportunity to stop the surcharge before it is assessed. Second, never pay a professional to “make the file disappear” — the exchange of information between London and Paris means the administration already holds the British figures, and a coherent, documented file with correct treaty references settles faster and cheaper than any shortcut. Done properly, the first return sets the pattern for every later year: residence established once, forms understood once, treaty positions recorded once, and each subsequent spring becomes a routine update rather than a fresh emergency.

Conclusion

Your first French tax return as a British resident stands on three pillars: honest residence analysis under Article 4 B, complete declaration through forms 2042, 2047 and 3916, and correct treaty application to each British income stream. The pension article gives France the taxing right over your ordinary UK pension while reserving Crown pensions to the United Kingdom; the immovable-property article lets Britain tax your UK rent first while obliging France to neutralise the double charge through its credit; and European coordination law may remove French social charges where you are affiliated elsewhere. Each pillar has its sanction — surcharges for late or missing returns, 1,500 euros per undeclared account, full taxation where a credit is forgotten — and each has its remedy: online correction, reasoned claim before 31 December of the second following year, and appeal to the administrative court within two months of rejection or silence. Prepare the file in year one with British certificates, treaty references and dated filings, verify every line of the first assessment notice, and challenge promptly anything that departs from the rules above. The French tax system rewards the organised newcomer and punishes the silent one; after Brexit, organisation is the whole of the art.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
2 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
6 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
3 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago