Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Made a Profit While You Live Abroad: Vote Dividends, Suffer Withholding and Reclaim Treaty Relief

Your French company has closed a profitable year and the money is sitting in the company bank account. You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, you own 100 percent or a large block of the shares, and you want to take part of that profit home. In France, that simple wish goes through a strict sequence: the accounts must be approved, the shareholders must vote the dividend, the company must withhold French tax at source, and only then can you claim a lower treaty rate or a European exemption from abroad. Skip one step and the distribution can be reclassified as a fictitious dividend, the withholding can be applied at the full domestic rate, and the refund you expected can be delayed by a year. This guide explains the full chain in plain English for a foreign founder or foreign shareholder: what can be distributed, how to vote and pay the dividend while living outside France, what France withholds on dividends paid to non-residents, and how the European parent-subsidiary exemption and bilateral tax treaties reduce or refund that withholding. Every French acronym is explained on first use, every decisive rule is tied to the official text in force, and every step can be completed from abroad with the right paperwork.

I. How to vote and pay dividends lawfully when you live abroad

A. What your French company can distribute: approved accounts, distributable profit and available reserves

Under French company law, dividends are not decided by the director alone and they are not paid out of turnover or cash alone. They are voted by the shareholders in an annual meeting, after the yearly accounts have been approved and after the meeting has confirmed that distributable sums exist. Article L.232-12 of the Commercial Code states that rule in one sentence: “Après approbation des comptes annuels et constatation de l’existence de sommes distribuables, l’assemblée générale détermine la part attribuée aux associés sous forme de dividendes.” In English: after approval of the annual accounts and confirmation that distributable sums exist, the shareholders’ meeting (assemblée générale, usually shortened to AG) sets the portion paid out as dividends. The meeting can be held by videoconference or by written consultation if your articles of association (statuts) allow it, which is the normal setup for a foreign owner who cannot fly to Paris for a signature. What matters is the written minute, the approved balance sheet and profit-and-loss account attached to it, and a clear vote showing the amount distributed per share and the total.

The amount itself is governed by Article L.232-11 of the Commercial Code, which defines distributable profit as follows: “Le bénéfice distribuable est constitué par le bénéfice de l’exercice, diminué des pertes antérieures, ainsi que des sommes à porter en réserve en application de la loi ou des statuts, et augmenté du report bénéficiaire.” In practice, you start from the profit of the financial year, subtract prior losses carried forward and the sums that must go to reserves by law or by your statuts, and add any retained earnings carried forward (report bénéficiaire) from earlier years. The same article adds two operational rules that foreign owners often discover too late. First, the meeting may also distribute sums taken from reserves that it is entitled to use, but the decision must state expressly from which reserve line the money is taken. Second, no distribution is allowed when equity would fall below the share capital plus the non-distributable reserves: “Hors le cas de réduction du capital, aucune distribution ne peut être faite aux actionnaires lorsque les capitaux propres sont ou deviendraient à la suite de celle-ci inférieurs au montant du capital augmenté des réserves que la loi ou les statuts ne permettent pas de distribuer.” Your accountant (expert-comptable) checks this ratio before any vote, because the Kbis — the official company registration certificate issued through the commercial court registry (greffe du tribunal de commerce) — does not protect a distribution that breaks this floor.

A concrete example helps. Suppose your SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) closes the year with 120,000 euros of accounting profit, 10,000 euros of prior losses still carried forward, and a legal reserve top-up of 5,000 euros required that year. The distributable profit of the year is 120,000 minus 10,000 minus 5,000, which is 105,000 euros, plus any retained earnings from prior years. Corporate income tax — impôt sur les sociétés, shortened to IS — has already been charged on the taxable profit at the standard rate, and the current standard rate is set by Article 219 of the General Tax Code: “Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %.” So a company with 140,000 euros of taxable profit pays roughly 35,000 euros of IS before anything can be distributed, and the dividend can only come from the after-tax remainder plus eligible reserves. If you distribute more than the law allows, the same Article L.232-12 issues a blunt warning: “Tout dividende distribué en violation des règles ci-dessus énoncées est un dividende fictif.” A fictitious dividend (dividende fictif) can be clawed back from the shareholders who received it, and directors who organised it face civil and in serious cases criminal exposure. That is why the order is never reversed: approve, confirm the distributable base in writing, then vote.

Two confusions cause most accidents for foreign owners. The first is mixing the dividend with the shareholder current account (compte courant d’associé), which is the loan-like account through which a shareholder lends money to the company or leaves sums at its disposal. Repaying that account is not a dividend, and voting a dividend does not repay that account. The second is mixing the dividend with monthly transfers the founder calls a salary or management fee. Only the voted dividend follows the dividend regime; everything else follows its own payroll or service-invoice regime and its own social charges through URSSAF, the social security collection agency. If you already put your choice of vehicle in place — SAS, SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company with stricter statutory framing), branch (succursale) or subsidiary (filiale) — the companion guide on choosing that vehicle explains which form distributes most simply for a non-resident owner: choosing between a SAS, a SARL, a branch and a subsidiary in France as a foreign founder. Once the vehicle exists, the dividend rules described here apply in the same way, with the branch variation noted below.

Before the vote, ask your accountant for three documents: the draft annual accounts with the proposed allocation of profit (affectation du résultat), a one-page distributable-profit computation showing prior losses, legal and statutory reserves and retained earnings, and the current equity-to-capital check. If the company carries a large report à nouveau (retained earnings) or a available reserve such as an extraordinary reserve your earlier meetings built up, the vote can combine the profit of the year with a draw on those lines, provided the minute names them expressly. If the company instead carries losses that wipe out the distributable base, no dividend can be voted that year even if the bank balance looks comfortable. Cash is not profit, and French courts look at the balance sheet, not the bank statement. The official company-life portal explains the publication and filing side of these yearly decisions in plain terms (see the service-public.fr pages on approving accounts and the INPI single filing portal, guichet unique, which has replaced the old direct filings at the greffe for most company filings): service-public.fr on the approval of company accounts and INPI single portal for company filings. Keep the minute, the accounts and the computation together: the tax administration and any future buyer will ask for exactly that bundle.

B. How to vote, document and pay the dividend while living outside France

The vote itself is an ordinary or extraordinary shareholders’ decision depending on what your statuts say about the allocation of profit; in most SAS structures used by foreign founders, the yearly allocation is an ordinary decision taken on first notice with the majority your statuts define. From abroad, three mechanics work in practice. The first is a videoconference meeting with a signed attendance sheet and a minute countersigned electronically. The second is a written consultation (consultation écrite) where each shareholder signs the text of the resolutions and returns it by email with an advanced electronic signature, followed by the originals sent by courier to the registered office (siège social). The third, for single-shareholder SASU or EURL structures, is a sole-shareholder decision (décision de l’associé unique) signed by you alone. All three are valid if your statuts allow them, and the choice should be written into your statuts at incorporation rather than improvised the week the dividend is needed. The minute must show the company name and registration number (SIREN, the nine-digit company identifier issued at registration), the date, the exact text of the approved accounts, the distributable base, the dividend per share, the total distributed, the payment date and the reserve lines used. Attach the approved accounts. Have the minute and the accounts filed through the INPI single portal so the greffe records the yearly filing; late filing draws fines and, more importantly for a foreign owner, signals disorder to banks and buyers.

Timing is governed by a short article that many founders overlook. Article L.232-13 of the Commercial Code provides: “Les modalités de mise en paiement des dividendes votés par l’assemblée générale sont fixées par elle ou, à défaut, par le conseil d’administration, le directoire ou les gérants, selon le cas. Toutefois, la mise en paiement des dividendes doit avoir lieu dans un délai maximal de neuf mois après la clôture de l’exercice. La prolongation de ce délai peut être accordée par décision de justice.” The meeting therefore sets the payment mechanics — bank transfer to the shareholder’s declared account, cheque, or set-off against a documented debt — and payment must occur within nine months after the financial year-end, unless a court extends the period. For a 31 December year-end, that means payment by 30 September of the following year. In practice, foreign shareholders align this vote with the corporate tax return (relevé de solde IS) and the accountant’s summer closing so the cash movement, the withholding computation and the tax filing all describe the same event. Interim dividends (acomptes sur dividendes) are possible before the year-end accounts are approved, but only on the basis of an interim balance sheet certified by the statutory auditor (commissaire aux comptes) when the company has one, and capped at the interim profit as Article L.232-12 describes. Most small foreign-owned SAS companies have no statutory auditor and should avoid interim dividends entirely: one missing certification is enough to turn the advance into an unlawful distribution.

Paying from abroad adds three practical layers. First, the bank: a transfer from the French company account to your personal or holding-company account abroad must carry the exact label “dividendes exercice” plus the year, because your home-country bank and tax authority will ask what the transfer is, and the French paying agent needs the same label to match the withholding slip. Keep the foreign-exchange slip. Second, identity and residence proof: your bank, your accountant and the French tax office each need a current proof of your non-resident status — passport, foreign tax residence certificate for the year of payment, and, where a treaty reduction is claimed at source, the treaty residence form discussed in Part II. Third, language: minutes can be bilingual, but the French version governs before the greffe and the tax administration. If you sign in English only, add a certified French translation before filing. None of these steps requires a trip to France. A videoconference vote, an electronic signature that meets the eIDAS qualified standard, a couriered original for the company books (registre des décisions), and an online filing through the INPI portal complete the chain. The company books stay at the registered office address in France — your domiciliation provider (the company that rents you the registered-office address, called domiciliation) keeps them available for inspection. Announce the payment to your home-country adviser the same week: the dividend is taxable in your country of residence under its own rules, with the French withholding credited or refunded under the applicable treaty, and late reporting at home creates penalties that no French exemption can cure.

A final documentation warning for groups: when the French company is owned by a foreign holding company, the dividend sometimes travels up through a chain — French subsidiary to Dutch or Luxembourg holding to ultimate parent — and each link must show board approval, a distribution resolution and a bank trace. French auditors and treaty partners look through chains without substance, and a dividend paid to a mailbox company with no staff, no premises and no decision-making can lose both the European exemption and the treaty rate. Keep the chain short, keep each company’s minute, and keep the bank statements showing the money moving from the French ISIN-paying account to the declared shareholder account. The official tax portal describes the declaration circuit for distributions in practical terms for the paying company (see the impots.gouv.fr professional pages on dividends and withholding and the BOFiP, the tax administration’s official published commentary, for the current forms and filing channel): impots.gouv.fr professional section on company tax filings and BOFiP official tax commentary. With the vote clean and the money traceable, the second question becomes purely fiscal: how much France keeps at source.

II. How French withholding hits foreign shareholders and how to reduce or reclaim it

A. What France withholds at source on dividends paid to non-residents

France taxes dividends paid to non-residents by withholding at source (retenue à la source) before the money reaches you. The charging provision is paragraph 2 of Article 119 bis of the General Tax Code: “Les produits visés aux articles 108 à 117 bis donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source dont le taux est fixé par l’article 187 lorsque leurs bénéficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur siège en France”. In short, dividends covered by Articles 108 to 117 bis distributed to beneficial owners who are not French tax residents suffer withholding at the rate set by Article 187. The French paying company — or the financial institution that pays on its behalf — is the withholding agent: it deducts the tax, pays you the net amount, and remits the withholding to the French Treasury with declaration 2777-D through the online tax channel. You receive a withholding slip (called an attestation de retenue) showing the gross dividend, the rate applied and the amount remitted. Keep it: it is the proof your home country and any reclaim both require.

The domestic rate depends on who you are. For corporate and similar beneficiaries, Article 187 points to the standard corporate tax rate: “Celui prévu au deuxième alinéa du I de l’article 219 pour tous les autres revenus.” Combined with the 25 percent standard IS rate quoted above, that means a dividend paid to a foreign company is in principle withheld at 25 percent. For individual beneficiaries, the same Article 187 sets a distinct domestic rate: “12,8 % pour les bénéficiaires personnes physiques.” A dividend of 80,000 euros paid to a non-resident individual therefore suffers 10,240 euros of French withholding at the domestic rate, leaving 69,760 euros transferred, before any treaty reduction. By contrast, dividends paid to French-resident individuals go through a different domestic mechanism — a 12.8 percent upfront levy (prélèvement) collected by the payer, described by Article 117 quater: “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B qui bénéficient de revenus distribués mentionnés aux articles 108 à 117 bis et 120 à 123 bis sont assujetties à un prélèvement au taux de 12,8 %.” The parallel wording confuses many foreign shareholders, so keep the distinction clear: the 12.8 percent prelevement of Article 117 quater applies to French residents as an advance on their personal income tax, while your dividend as a non-resident falls under the 119 bis withholding, at 12.8 percent for individuals and at the IS rate for companies unless an exemption or treaty says otherwise.

Two related charges complete the picture and must not be mixed with the withholding. First, interest-like income on shareholder current accounts (the compte courant d’associé mentioned in Part I) follows the interest regime, whose payer-side levy for French-resident individuals is described by Article 125 A: “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B qui bénéficient d’intérêts, arrérages et produits de toute nature de fonds d’Etat, obligations, titres participatifs, bons et autres titres de créances, dépôts, cautionnements et comptes courants […] sont assujetties à un prélèvement lorsque la personne qui assure le paiement de ces revenus est établie en France”. If you leave money in your current account and the company pays you interest, that interest is not a dividend and follows this separate track. Second, dividends distributed by a French company remain part of a result already taxed at IS at 25 percent, so the overall burden on a distributed euro combines IS at company level with withholding at shareholder level, softened only by the exemption or treaty of Part II.B. Work the combined arithmetic before voting: on 100,000 euros of pre-tax profit, IS takes about 25,000, leaving 75,000 distributable; a 25 percent withholding on the 75,000 takes another 18,750, leaving 56,250 in hand; a 15 percent treaty rate instead leaves 63,750; a full European parent exemption leaves the whole 75,000. The vote in Part I decides the 75,000; this Part decides how much of it survives the border.

Deadlines and proof from abroad follow a fixed rhythm. The withholding is declared and paid by the payer in the month after payment through the 2777-D channel; the shareholder’s reclaim, if tax was over-withheld relative to the treaty, runs on a separate timetable through the foreign-tax-residence forms and the French non-resident tax office (Service des impôts des particuliers non-résidents, SIPNR). Practical tip: request your foreign tax residence certificate for the year of payment early — some countries issue it only after the local return is filed — and ask the French payer for the withholding attestation within days of the transfer, not months later. Banks merge, accountants rotate staff, and reconstructing a two-year-old slip from abroad is slow. If the dividend goes to a branch structure rather than a subsidiary, warn your adviser: profits of a French branch of a foreign company can face a specific branch levy on deemed distributed earnings, with its own treaty analysis, so the subsidiary-versus-branch choice made at incorporation keeps echoing at distribution time.

B. How to pay less lawfully from abroad: European parent exemption, treaty caps and the reclaim file

The first relief to test is the European parent-subsidiary exemption, because when it applies the French withholding drops to zero at source. Article 119 ter of the General Tax Code provides the entry point: “La retenue à la source prévue au 2 de l’article 119 bis n’est pas applicable aux dividendes distribués à une personne morale qui remplit les conditions énumérées au 2 du présent article par une société ou un organisme soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés au taux normal.” The conditions that follow in the same article are cumulative and documentary. The parent must have its effective management in a European Union member state or in a European Economic Area state that has an administrative-assistance treaty with France; it must take one of the legal forms covered by the European parent-subsidiary directive or an equivalent form; and it must hold directly at least 10 percent of the capital of the French distributing company, continuously for two years or more in full or bare ownership, or commit to keep the stake for at least two years while appointing a French tax representative answerable for the withholding if the commitment is broken. The rate is lowered to 5 percent where the parent holds stakes meeting the conditions set for certain long-term holdings, a refinement your adviser checks against the current BOFiP commentary before the payment date. In practice, the parent sends the French payer, before the dividend is paid, a file proving beneficial ownership, eligible form, qualifying seat and the holding percentage with its acquisition date or the two-year commitment plus the representative appointment. When that file is complete, the payer applies zero withholding and keeps the file for audit. When it is incomplete, the payer must withhold at the domestic rate and the parent reclaims later, which is slower and invites questions. Build the exemption file before the vote in Part I, not after the money has moved.

The second relief is the bilateral tax treaty network, which caps the French withholding for residents of the treaty partner even when the European exemption does not apply. France has treaties with the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, most EU states, the Gulf states and many others, and the dividend article of each treaty sets its own maximum French tax — commonly 15 percent for portfolio shareholders, often 5 percent or zero for direct corporate holders above a treaty-defined ownership threshold, with residual differences for regulated investment vehicles and pension funds. The treaty applies only to the beneficial owner who is genuinely resident of the partner state for the year of payment, and only on production of the residence proof the treaty procedure requires. France operates this through two standard forms handled by the non-resident tax office: form 5000, the certificate of residence signed or stamped by your home tax authority, and form 5001, the computation and claim of the treaty reduction or refund, supported by the French withholding attestation and the bank trace. Where the payer accepts a complete 5000 before payment under the simplified procedure, the reduced treaty rate is applied at source and only the reduced amount is remitted. Where the file arrives late, the full domestic rate is withheld and the difference is reclaimed afterwards through the same forms. Either way, the home country then taxes the dividend under its own rules and grants a credit for the French tax up to the treaty limit, so the same euro is not taxed twice. Ask your home-country adviser in the same month as the French vote how that credit is claimed locally — American, British and Emirati residents each follow a different local return line, and the French attestation is the common input all of them need.

The reclaim timetable rewards early filers. The French claim for over-withheld dividends follows the general tax-claim time limit, which in practice means filing before 31 December of the second year after the withholding, with interest on late refunds running only within statutory bounds. A dividend paid in 2026 and over-withheld should therefore be reclaimed during 2027 and no later than 31 December 2028, with the complete bundle: form 5000 for 2026, form 5001 computation, withholding attestation, dividend minute extract, bank statement showing the net transfer, and proof of your foreign bank account (RIB or equivalent) for the refund. File through the channel the non-resident office currently indicates — the impots.gouv.fr contact route for non-residents and the BOFiP pages on international withholding show the live address and upload path — and keep the acknowledgment. Three mistakes account for most rejections: a 5000 certificate for the wrong year, a claim signed by someone without authority over the shareholder account, and a gross-versus-net confusion where the shareholder claims the IS paid by the company on top of the withholding. Only the withholding is reclaimable; the company’s IS is not yours to recover. Where the dividend was paid to an individual who later moved country mid-year, attach both residence certificates and let the offices split the year under the applicable treaties rather than guessing a single residence. Where the shareholder is a transparent partnership, add the allocation schedule showing each partner’s share, because France looks through to the partners for treaty purposes.

Two frontier cases deserve a short warning because foreign founders meet them often. The first is the holding company with little substance: treaty benefits and the European exemption both require genuine beneficial ownership and, for the exemption, an eligible form and real establishment. A recently created holding with no employees, no premises and no board minutes of its own that receives the French dividend one day and forwards it the next will be challenged, and the challenge arrives as a reassessment with penalties, not as a polite questionnaire. Capitalise the holding, hold real board meetings, keep its own accounts, and let the dividend sit before onward distribution. The second is the American owner: the France-United States treaty and the FATCA information-exchange framework mean the French payer and the American recipient each report the dividend, and the American return claims the French tax as a credit within the Internal Revenue Service limits. Coordinate the French 5000/5001 calendar with the American return calendar so the credit and the refund claim describe identical figures. The same coordination applies to British, Canadian and Swiss residents under their own treaty articles. Done correctly, the chain reads cleanly from end to end: a lawful vote on an after-tax base, a withholding slip at the correct domestic, exempt or treaty rate, and a matching credit at home.

Conclusion

Taking profit out of a French company from abroad is a four-step discipline, not a single transfer. Approve the accounts and confirm the distributable base under Articles L.232-11 and L.232-12, vote the dividend in a minute that names the amounts and the reserve lines, pay within the nine-month period of Article L.232-13, suffer the Article 119 bis withholding at the Article 187 rate — 25 percent in effect for foreign companies, 12.8 percent for non-resident individuals — and then remove the excess through the Article 119 ter European exemption or the applicable treaty via forms 5000 and 5001. Keep the bundle that proves each step: the distributable-profit computation, the signed minute with the accounts, the bank trace labelled by year, the withholding attestation, and the residence certificate for the year of payment. With that file, a dividend voted in Paris, paid to London, New York or Dubai, and credited at home survives every audit on both sides of the border.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
2 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
3 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago