Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Needs Premises While You Live Abroad: Sign a 3/6/9 Commercial Lease, Control the Rent and Survive Non-Renewal

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, your French company is registered and trading, and now it needs a real address with real walls: an office, a shop, a workshop or a warehouse. In France, the moment your company rents premises to run its business, a protective legal regime almost automatically applies: the statut des baux commerciaux, the commercial lease regime of the Commercial Code. Foreign founders often discover it too late, either by signing a lease that quietly gives away rights the statute would have granted them, or by learning at renewal that the rent can jump to market value, or that the landlord can refuse renewal altogether. This guide explains, entirely from the official texts and court decisions in force on 9 October 2026, how to choose the right lease, what to negotiate before signing, how the rent moves during the lease, and how a non-renewal ends with either an eviction payment or an orderly exit. Every French acronym is explained as it appears.

I. Take the Right Lease and Lock In Fair Terms Before You Move In

A. Choose Between the 3/6/9 Commercial Lease and the Short-Term Trial Lease

The first question a foreign founder must ask is whether the protective regime applies at all. Article L.145-1 of the Commercial Code states that the chapter applies to leases of buildings or premises in which a business (fonds de commerce, meaning the going concern: customers, lease right, stock and equipment taken together) is operated, provided the business belongs to a trader or industrialist registered with the RCS (Registre du commerce et des sociétés, the French companies register kept by the greffe, the court clerk’s office of the commercial court) or to a craft business registered with the RNE (Registre national des entreprises, the national business register). The official entreprendre.service-public.fr page summarises the test in four cumulative conditions: a lease contract, premises for commercial, craft or industrial use, operation of a business in the premises, and registration of the tenant with the RCS or the RNE (see the official contract page). The practical consequence for a founder living abroad is direct: if your French vehicle is not yet registered, or if you sign the lease in your own name before the company exists and is registered, you may fall outside the protection. Register first, through the INPI (Institut national de la propriété industrielle, which runs the single online business formalities desk, the Guichet unique), obtain the Kbis (the official company identity extract issued by the greffe, the standard proof that your company legally exists), and only then sign in the company’s name. If you are still hesitating between a SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible limited company most foreign founders choose), a SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the more rigid closed company) or a branch, read our companion guide on choosing between a SAS, a SARL and a branch in France before committing to premises, because the tenant named on the lease should be the vehicle that will actually operate the business.

Once registration is secured, the default instrument is the 3/6/9 lease, so called because it lasts nine years with an exit every three. Article L.145-4 of the Commercial Code provides: “La durée du contrat de location ne peut être inférieure à neuf ans.” The same article gives the tenant the key counterpart right: “le preneur a la faculté de donner congé à l’expiration d’une période triennale, au moins six mois à l’avance, par lettre recommandée avec demande d’avis de réception ou par acte extrajudiciaire.” In plain English: a nine-year minimum term, with the tenant free to leave at the end of each three-year period on six months’ notice sent by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt or by bailiff’s writ (acte extrajudiciaire, today served by a commissaire de justice, the merged profession of former bailiffs and judicial officers). Note the asymmetry that surprises many foreign tenants: the landlord cannot end the lease at those three-year marks except on narrow statutory grounds such as rebuilding or demolition. Offices-only leases and certain storage premises may lawfully contain contrary clauses, which is why a pure office tenant in Paris La Défense or the Paris central business district must read the termination clause with particular care rather than assume the 3/6/9 rhythm applies in full.

The alternative for testing the French market is the derogatory short lease (bail dérogatoire). Article L.145-5 of the Commercial Code allows the parties, when the tenant takes possession, to set aside the whole protective chapter “à la condition que la durée totale du bail ou des baux successifs ne soit pas supérieure à trois ans.” The official page on short-term derogatory leases confirms the mechanism. This is the instrument of choice for a foreign company that wants a one- or two-year showroom on the rue de Rivoli, a pop-up store, or a pilot workshop before committing to nine years. But the trap is mechanical and unforgiving: if the tenant stays on with the landlord’s tolerance beyond the term, and at the latest one month after expiry, a brand-new lease governed by the full protective regime automatically arises. Many foreign founders who “just stayed a few months longer” discover they have become holders of a nine-year commercial lease, with all the duties that status implies. Diarise the expiry date from abroad, instruct a local contact, and either leave or sign a deliberate new lease before the deadline.

Two entry formalities deserve attention because disputes about them are frequent and expensive. First, the security deposit (dépôt de garantie). According to the official contract page, for any lease signed or renewed from 28 May 2026 the deposit is now capped by law at one quarter of rent, meaning three months. Older leases may still carry higher deposits, so a founder taking over existing premises (cession de bail, assignment of the lease, or cession de fonds, purchase of the going concern with its lease) should check which regime governs. Second, the handover inspection (état des lieux). The official guidance states that an inspection report must be drawn up jointly by landlord and tenant when the tenant takes possession, describing each room and its equipment precisely, with a commissaire de justice splitting the cost if the parties disagree. A founder who cannot fly in for the handover should mandate a representative in writing and keep dated photographs, because without an entry report the tenant is presumed to have received the premises in good repair and will struggle to recover the deposit or contest dilapidation claims at exit.

B. Negotiate the Rent, the Charges and the Works Before You Sign

The initial rent of a new commercial lease is freely agreed between the parties. That freedom makes the surrounding clauses decisive, because each of them will shape what you pay for the next nine years. Three documents must be settled before signature: the rent and indexation clause, the schedule of charges and taxes, and the works programme.

Indexation (clause d’échelle mobile) adjusts the rent each year by reference to an official index published by INSEE (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques, the national statistics office): the ILC (indice des loyers commerciaux, the commercial rents index) for retail and commercial premises, or the ILAT (indice des loyers des activités tertiaires, the tertiary activities index) for offices and services. A clause that compares mismatched periods, for example a base quarter that does not correspond to the anniversary rhythm of the revisions, can be struck down as unlawful. The Cour de cassation (the supreme court for civil and commercial matters, whose Third Civil Chamber hears commercial lease cases) upheld this discipline in a widely cited ruling: Cass. civ. 3rd, 17 May 2018, appeal no. 17-15.146. The court approved judges who had verified that no distortion existed between the fixed base index and the successive comparison indices, holding that “le juge devrait adapter le jeu de la clause d’échelle mobile à la valeur locative, la révision du loyer ne pouvant elle-même organiser la distorsion prohibée par la loi” (the judge must adapt the indexation clause to the rental value, since the revision of the rent cannot itself create the distortion prohibited by law). The same ruling confirmed that where the rent had risen by more than a quarter since it was last fixed, the landlord’s request to reset the revised rent to rental value was admissible: “le loyer ayant augmenté de plus du quart depuis sa dernière fixation, la demande de fixation du loyer révisé à la valeur locative était recevable”. For a foreign tenant, the lesson is concrete: accept ILC or ILAT with matching quarters and anniversary dates, refuse any exotic private index, and keep every annual indexation notice, because the history of increases will determine who can demand a reset and when.

Charges, taxes and fees are the second negotiation front, and the statute is unusually strict with landlords. Article L.145-40-2 of the Commercial Code requires: “Tout contrat de location comporte un inventaire précis et limitatif des catégories de charges, impôts, taxes et redevances liés à ce bail, comportant l’indication de leur répartition entre le bailleur et le locataire.” Every lease must therefore contain a precise and exhaustive list of charge categories with their allocation between landlord and tenant, followed by an annual summary statement, plus a three-year forward works budget and a three-year backward works record communicated at signature and then every three years. The official page on the allocation of charges, taxes and works details the scheme. From abroad, insist on receiving the backward-looking works statement before signing: it reveals whether a major roof, façade or lift programme is coming and who the lease says pays for it. In Paris and the inner suburbs (petite couronne: Hauts-de-Seine, Seine-Saint-Denis, Val-de-Marne), where service charges in managed office buildings can add 30 to 60 euros per square metre per year, an uncapped charge clause can cost more than the rent increase you thought you had negotiated away.

Finally, verify who owns what ends up attached to the walls. Fit-out works (travaux d’aménagement) paid for by a foreign tenant, air conditioning, kitchens, partitioning, become the landlord’s property by accession at the end of the lease unless the lease says otherwise, and the tenant that removes them must restore the premises. Negotiate a written schedule of authorised works with a waiver of the restoration obligation for agreed improvements, and align it with the landlord’s three-year works budget so that your fit-out is not torn out by a façade programme in year two. If the landlord later decides to sell the walls, be aware that Article L.145-46-1 of the Commercial Code gives the tenant of retail or craft premises a statutory pre-emption right (droit de préférence): the owner must notify the price and conditions by registered letter, and the tenant has one month to accept, then two months, or four with a loan, to complete. A foreign group that likes its Paris shop may one day buy the freehold through this mechanism, but only if it kept its contact address for notifications up to date.

II. Live With the Lease, Control the Rent and Survive Its Ending

A. Pay on Time, Revise Every Three Years and Challenge Unlawful Indexation

During the lease, two clocks run simultaneously: the payment clock, where delay triggers a formidable termination machinery, and the revision clock, where each side periodically resets the rent. Understanding both from abroad, with a local manager or counsel diarising every date, is the difference between a controlled tenancy and a crisis.

The payment clock is governed by the termination clause (clause résolutoire), which most French commercial leases contain. Article L.145-41 of the Commercial Code, in its wording in force since the simplification statute of 26 May 2026 (Law no. 2026-403), states: “Toute clause insérée dans le bail prévoyant la résiliation de plein droit ne produit effet qu’un mois après un commandement demeuré infructueux. Le commandement doit, à peine de nullité, mentionner ce délai.” In practice, after any missed rent, the landlord serves a formal payment order (commandement de payer) through a commissaire de justice; the tenant then has exactly one month to pay the arrears in full, and the order is void if it fails to mention that one-month period. If the tenant pays within the month, the clause is neutralised for that incident. If not, the landlord may ask the court to record (constater) the termination, which operates almost automatically.

The same article L.145-41 preserves the judges’ power to grant mercy delays (délais de grâce): “Les juges saisis d’une demande présentée dans les formes et conditions prévues à l’article 1343-5 du code civil peuvent, en accordant des délais, suspendre la réalisation et les effets des clauses résolutoires, lorsque la résiliation n’est pas constatée ou prononcée par une décision de justice ayant acquis l’autorité de la chose jugée.” And: “La clause résolutoire ne joue pas, si le locataire se libère dans les conditions fixées par le juge.” But since May 2026 this indulgence has a new, harder edge for unpaid rent: “L’octroi de délai de paiement et la suspension des effets de la clause résolutoire pour non-paiement des loyers sont, par ailleurs, conditionnés à la capacité du preneur à régler la dette locative et à la reprise du versement intégral du loyer courant avant la date de la première audience.” A foreign company in temporary cash difficulty must therefore do two things before the first hearing: prove it can clear the arrears and actually resume paying the full current rent. Wire transfers from abroad take time and French landlords’ counsel check bank statements closely, so instruct payment of the current rent immediately upon receiving any commandement, even while negotiating the arrears schedule. The official page on terminating a commercial lease usefully summarises the procedure for non-specialists.

The revision clock entitles each party, every three years, to demand that the rent be reset to rental value (valeur locative, the market rent determined by the characteristics of the premises, their permitted use, the parties’ respective obligations, local commerciality factors and comparable neighbourhood rents). Article L.145-38 of the Commercial Code sets the rhythm: “La demande en révision ne peut être formée que trois ans au moins après la date d’entrée en jouissance du locataire ou après le point de départ du bail renouvelé.” Triennial revision is then capped by default to the movement of the ILC or ILAT index, unless a material change in local commerciality factors moving rental value by more than 10% is proved. At renewal, the logic is parallel but distinct: Article L.145-33 of the Commercial Code states the principle that “Le montant des loyers des baux renouvelés ou révisés doit correspondre à la valeur locative”, while Article L.145-34 caps the renewed rent of a lease of nine years or less to the index movement since the original rent was fixed, unless a notable change in the statutory rental-value factors is shown. The Cour de cassation ruling of 17 May 2018 cited above illustrates the articulation: indexation is policed for distortion, and a rent that has climbed more than a quarter can be pulled back to rental value by the judge. For premises in Paris, where the facteurs locaux de commercialité (footfall, transport, neighbouring brands) move fast, both sides should commission an expert valuation (expertise) before the revision or renewal date rather than exchange bare assertions: the Paris judicial court (tribunal judiciaire de Paris, which has a specialised commercial rents division, the pôle des loyers commerciaux) decides dozens of these valuation disputes each year, and the party with a reasoned expert report almost always frames the debate.

B. Face Renewal or Refusal: Renew, Claim Eviction Compensation or Leave Cleanly

Every 3/6/9 lease ends with the same fork: renewal or departure, and departure with or without compensation. The tenant that has operated its business continuously holds the strong hand. Article L.145-8 of the Commercial Code provides: “Le droit au renouvellement du bail ne peut être invoqué que par le propriétaire du fonds qui est exploité dans les lieux.” Only the owner of the business actually operated in the premises can claim renewal, and the business must have been effectively operated during the three years before expiry, absent legitimate reasons. A foreign company that keeps a Paris lease as a mere brass plaque (plaque) address while operating from abroad, with no genuine activity, no staff and no turnover in the premises, risks losing the renewal right entirely. Keep the shop or office genuinely running, file the accounts, and keep proof of operation: tax returns, employment records, supplier invoices and client contracts tied to the address.

Procedurally, nothing ends without a formal step. Article L.145-9 of the Commercial Code states: “les baux de locaux soumis au présent chapitre ne cessent que par l’effet d’un congé donné six mois à l’avance ou d’une demande de renouvellement.” Without a six-month notice to quit (congé) or a renewal request (demande de renouvellement), a written lease continues by tacit extension (tacite prolongation), during which notice must be given six months ahead for the last day of a calendar quarter. The symmetry is deceptive: the tenant’s renewal request and the landlord’s congé look alike but produce opposite effects, so every notice received while abroad must be forwarded to French counsel the same day. A congé with refusal of renewal must state reasons; the official page on refusal of renewal by the landlord and the page on renewal or tacit extension walk through the steps.

When the landlord refuses renewal, compensation is the rule and refusal without compensation the narrow exception. Article L.145-14 of the Commercial Code states: “payer au locataire évincé une indemnité dite d’éviction égale au préjudice causé par le défaut de renouvellement” The eviction payment (indemnité d’éviction) covers in particular the market value of the business assessed by professional usage, plus standard removal and reinstallation costs and transfer duties for an equivalent business, unless the owner proves the loss is smaller. And the tenant cannot be forced out before being paid: Article L.145-28 provides that “Aucun locataire pouvant prétendre à une indemnité d’éviction ne peut être obligé de quitter les lieux avant de l’avoir reçue. Jusqu’au paiement de cette indemnité, il a droit au maintien dans les lieux aux conditions et clauses du contrat de bail expiré.” This right to remain (droit au maintien dans les lieux) is the foreign tenant’s strongest practical shield: it converts an abrupt eviction into a funded transition, with an occupancy payment (indemnité d’occupation) set under the same valuation rules until the compensation is paid.

A second Cour de cassation ruling completes the picture and corrects a frequent misunderstanding. In Cass. civ. 3rd, 28 June 2018, appeal no. 17-18.756, a landlord had served a notice to quit refusing renewal without offering compensation, and the tenant sued to annul the notice and obtain the eviction payment. The court held that the nullity of such a notice under article L.145-9 is only relative: “la nullité de ce congé prévue par l’article L. 145-9 du code de commerce est une nullité relative qui ne peut être soulevée que par le preneur”. The tenant then has a genuine choice: “celui-ci peut soit renoncer à la nullité du congé en sollicitant une indemnité d’éviction et en se maintenant dans les lieux en l’attente de son paiement en application de l’article L. 145-28 du même code, soit s’en prévaloir en optant pour la poursuite du bail”. Whether the tenant stayed in the premises or not is irrelevant to the effects of the irregular notice. For a founder abroad, the message is operational: an unmotivated or equivocal congé is not a dead letter that you can frame and ignore; it ends the lease, and you must actively elect between pursuing the lease (invoking nullity) and cashing out (waiving nullity and claiming the payment while staying put). Silence is the only losing option, because limitation periods (prescription, two years for most commercial lease claims) run while mail piles up at the Paris address.

When departure is the chosen path, whether at a three-year exit, at expiry, or after a refused renewal with compensation, the exit must be as documented as the entry. Give notice in the statutory form and time, commission a joint exit inspection, photograph everything, stop the direct debits only after the final account (décompte définitif) of charges is settled, and obtain written clearance for the deposit. If the landlord withholds the deposit over alleged damage that the entry report contradicts, the small sums involved often suit the juge des référés (the urgent-applications judge) or the simplified small-claims declaration (déclaration au greffe) rather than a full trial. Throughout, keep a single chronological file, in French or with certified translations, of the lease, amendments, indexation notices, charge statements, works correspondence and every commandement or congé: the Paris courts decide commercial lease cases on paper, and the foreign litigant whose file is complete usually beats the local party whose file is not.

Conclusion

Renting business premises in France from abroad is neither exotic nor perilous once the statute is read as an operating manual. Register the company and sign in its name so the protective regime of article L.145-1 applies; choose deliberately between the nine-year 3/6/9 lease of article L.145-4 with its three-year tenant exits and the short derogatory lease of article L.145-5, never drifting from one into the other by inertia; cap the deposit, list every charge under article L.145-40-2 and budget the works before signing; pay the current rent at the first sign of a payment order and diarise the triennial revision of article L.145-38 within the rental-value principle of article L.145-33; and at the end, either renew under articles L.145-8 and L.145-9 or convert a refused renewal into a funded transition through the eviction compensation of article L.145-14 with the right to remain of article L.145-28. The two Cour de cassation rulings of May and June 2018 show the courts policing indexation distortion and giving the tenant a real choice when faced with an irregular notice. With the dates diarised, the file complete and local counsel copied on every formal notice, the Paris, Hauts-de-Seine or Val-de-Marne premises become what they should be: the French home of a foreign business, not a source of cross-border litigation.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
2 days ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
1 week ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
3 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago