Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Need to Close Your French Company While You Live Abroad: Dissolution, Liquidation, Tax Clearance and Strike-Off

You created a French company for a project that never took off, your French subsidiary has lost its purpose after a reorganisation, or your SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible French joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) sits dormant and keeps generating accounting bills, CFE (cotisation foncière des entreprises, the annual local business tax) notices and filing reminders. You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore and you ask a simple question: how do I close this French company properly, from abroad, without flying to Paris for every signature, and without leaving a debt, a tax return or a court summons behind? This guide explains the full path for a solvent company: early dissolution voted by the partners, amicable liquidation run by a liquidator, final tax and social filings, then strike-off (radiation) from the RCS (registre du commerce et des sociétés, the French commercial register kept by the greffe, the court registry). It also explains the shortcut for a one-member company held by another company, the deadlines that trap foreign directors, and the proof your bank, your landlord and the French tax office will ask for. The developments below are of general scope: they describe the standard voluntary-closure path and do not describe the situation of any particular company. For the starting point of the whole journey, read our pillar guide on choosing the right French vehicle as a foreign founder: SAS, SARL, branch or subsidiary, which explains why closing rules differ according to the vehicle you picked.

I. How to dissolve and liquidate a solvent French SAS or SARL while you live abroad

Voluntary closure of a solvent company follows two distinct legal steps. First the dissolution, which stops the normal life of the company and opens the liquidation period. Then the liquidation itself, during which the liquidator sells the assets, pays the creditors, closes the accounts and asks for the strike-off. French law states the principle in one sentence: “La dissolution de la société entraîne sa liquidation, hormis les cas prévus à l’article 1844-4 et au troisième alinéa de l’article 1844-5 .” That sentence comes from Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code. The same article adds the rule foreign directors forget most often: “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation jusqu’à la publication de la clôture de celle-ci.” The company therefore survives as a legal person until the very end, with its registered office (siège social), its bank account and its capacity to be sued. You cannot simply walk away, stop filing and assume the company vanished. The Commercial Code repeats the mechanism for commercial companies: “La société est en liquidation dès l’instant de sa dissolution pour quelque cause que ce soit sauf dans le cas prévu au troisième alinéa de l’article 1844-5 du code civil.” See Article L237-2 of the Commercial Code. That article also imposes the trading name rule: “Sa dénomination sociale est suivie de la mention ” société en liquidation “.” Every invoice, letter and email must carry it. And it warns: “La dissolution d’une société ne produit ses effets à l’égard des tiers qu’à compter de la date à laquelle elle est publiée au registre du commerce et des sociétés.” Until publication on the RCS, the dissolution cannot be raised against third parties. The detailed liquidation regime starts with a reminder that your articles of association matter first: “Sous réserve des dispositions du présent chapitre, la liquidation des sociétés est régie par les dispositions contenues dans les statuts.” See Article L237-1 of the Commercial Code. Read your statutes before you vote anything.

A. Vote the early dissolution, appoint the liquidator and publish without travelling to France

A solvent SAS or SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the French private limited company with a more rigid statutory frame) ends most often by early dissolution decided by the partners. The legal menu of endings is listed by Article 1844-7 of the Civil Code, which includes “Par la dissolution anticipée décidée par les associés”. In a SARL the vote follows the majority required for amending the statutes. In a SAS the statutes define the majority, and for the related liquidation decisions the fallback rule is stated by Article L237-27 of the Commercial Code: “Sauf clause contraire, à l’unanimité des associés, dans les sociétés par actions simplifiée.” Check your SAS statutes now. Many SAS statutes of foreign groups require unanimity or a reinforced majority for dissolution, and a foreign parent that assumes a simple majority suffices discovers the trap at the signing table. The meeting can be held by videoconference and the minutes signed electronically if your statutes allow it, which almost every recently drafted SAS does. A director living abroad can therefore chair, vote by proxy for the foreign parent, and appoint the liquidator in the same deed. The liquidator is very often the former president of the SAS or the gérant (manager) of the SARL, or a trusted third person in France who can receive mail, visit the bank and sign the filings. The appointment follows the statutes, and in silence of the statutes the partners appoint the liquidator. Publication must then be visible to third parties: the appointment deed “est publié, dans le délai d’un mois, dans un support habilité à recevoir les annonces légales dans le département du siège social”, with the company name followed by the liquidation mention, the capital, the registered office, the cause of the liquidation, the name and address of the liquidator and the court registry where liquidation documents will be filed. That is Article R237-2 of the Commercial Code. In practice you order the legal notice (annonce légale) online from your country, then the liquidator files the dissolution on the Guichet unique (the single online company formalities portal operated by the INPI, the French intellectual-property and companies institute, which replaced the old CFE centres). The official company-closure page of the INPI confirms the two-step logic: the INPI explains that the liquidator files two successive steps on its secure e-procedures portal, first the dissolution and later the strike-off See the INPI guide to closing a company: dissolution and strike-off. The administration’s business-closure page adds the deadline: the administration asks the liquidator to record the voluntary dissolution on the company formalities portal during the month after the partners vote See Service-public Entreprendre: cessation of activity of a company (voluntary dissolution). From abroad, plan three practical points at this stage. First, the Guichet unique account must be opened in the name of the liquidator or your French counsel with a verified email, because every rejection notice arrives there. Second, the Kbis (the official identity card of a French company issued by the greffe) will soon show the mention “société en liquidation” with the liquidator’s name. Order a fresh Kbis after the RCS updates it: banks and landlords only believe the Kbis. Third, inform the bank on day one and restrict payments to joint signature of the liquidator if needed, because creditors paid after dissolution in breach of equality can trigger personal claims against the liquidator. A Versailles court recently recalled that a liquidator sued in that capacity answers for management faults of the liquidation period, in a case where the former single shareholder was sued as amicable liquidator of a renovation company (Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, 4th Chamber, 18 September 2025, RG 22/06467, full text read for this article, official record at Cour de cassation database record 68cc53729da368950468f4cd). The lesson for a foreign group is direct: appoint a liquidator who will actually do the work and keep the paper trail.

B. Run the liquidation: sell, collect, pay, approve the closing accounts and share what remains

Once dissolved, the company cannot start new business. It can only finish pending contracts, sell stock and equipment, collect receivables, terminate the commercial lease (bail commercial), dismiss or transfer employees where applicable, and pay creditors. The INPI summarises the liquidator’s job in plain terms: during the liquidation period the liquidator selling the assets, collecting receivables, paying the debts, drawing up the final accounts, having the partners approve them, sharing any surplus, then requesting the strike-off That is the same INPI closing guide quoted above. When statutes are silent or a dispute arises, the law provides a judicial path: Article L237-14 of the Commercial Code allows liquidation “conformément aux dispositions de la présente section” at the request of partners holding at least 5% in SARL and joint-stock companies, or at the request of the creditors. For a foreign founder this matters when a minority partner blocks the sale or when a creditor refuses to send a final statement. Each year while the liquidation lasts, the liquidator must report. The Code states: “Le liquidateur, dans les trois mois de la clôture de chaque exercice, établit les comptes annuels au vu de l’inventaire qu’il a dressé des divers éléments de l’actif et du passif existant à cette date et un rapport écrit par lequel il rend compte des opérations de liquidation au cours de l’exercice écoulé.” See Article L237-25 of the Commercial Code. In small closures the liquidation lasts a few months and only one closing set of accounts is needed. In longer cases, hold the annual meeting, approve the yearly liquidation accounts, and file them with the greffe. Do not distribute cash to the foreign parent before the creditors are paid and the closing accounts approved. French courts treat early distributions as a classic fault of the liquidator. Keep a strict order: realise the assets, obtain final statements from the URSSAF (union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales, the agency collecting employer social charges), the DGFIP (direction générale des finances publiques, the tax administration) and suppliers, pay in the legal ranking, set aside provisions for disputed invoices and tax reassessment periods, then convene the partners to approve the closing accounts (comptes de liquidation), record the quitus (discharge) of the liquidator, and decide the distribution of the liquidation surplus (boni de liquidation). The surplus paid to a non-resident parent or individual then triggers its own withholding analysis, which belongs to the tax step below. One frequent foreign-founder error is to close the bank account too early. Keep the account open until the last tax payment clears and the strike-off is published, because the DGFIP refunds and the final URSSAF adjustments arrive by transfer and a closed account sends the file to suspense. Another error is to forget the lease. A Paris commercial lease often requires six months’ notice by bailiff deed, and the landlord’s final charge statement arrives months after departure. Provision for it. A third error concerns single-member companies. If your SASU (SAS with one shareholder) or EURL (SARL with one shareholder) is held by a foreign legal person, there is no liquidation at all. The Service-public page warns: a one-member EURL or SASU held by a legal person skips the liquidation phase, with all assets and debts passing directly to the sole shareholder That is the same Service-public voluntary dissolution page. The Civil Code organises this TUP (transmission universelle du patrimoine, the transfer of all assets and debts to the sole shareholder): “En cas de dissolution, celle-ci entraîne la transmission universelle du patrimoine de la société à l’associé unique, sans qu’il y ait lieu à liquidation.” And it protects creditors: “Les créanciers peuvent faire opposition à la dissolution dans le délai de trente jours à compter de la publication de celle-ci.” Both sentences come from Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code. Recent first-instance litigation shows creditors actually use this thirty-day window to block or condition the transfer, for example the opposition admitted by the Avignon economic-activities tribunal on 30 March 2025 (No. 2025003161, official record at Cour de cassation database record 69e4a834cdc6046d47c70d78). If you run a French SASU held by your UK, US or UAE holding, publish the dissolution, wait the thirty days, check the BODACC (bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the gazette where company notices appear) for oppositions, and only then book the transfer. If an opposition is filed, the transfer waits for a court decision ordering repayment or sufficient guarantees.

II. How to leave France cleanly from abroad: tax, social filings and RCS strike-off

French closure is not complete when the partners shook hands on the closing accounts. The tax office, the URSSAF and the RCS each need their own filing, and each filing has its own clock. Foreign directors who manage the closure by email underestimate the French sequence: dissolve first, liquidate, then only ask for strike-off. The INPI states the order without ambiguity: dissolution comes first and no company leaves the register without a prior dissolution decided by its members And it caps the horizon: the INPI describes a dissolution period that, as a rule, stays within three years Both sentences come from the same INPI closing guide. The Civil Code gives the court the tool when the period drifts: “Si la clôture de la liquidation n’est pas intervenue dans un délai de trois ans à compter de la dissolution, le ministère public ou tout intéressé peut saisir le tribunal, qui fait procéder à la liquidation ou, si celle-ci a été commencée, à son achèvement.” That is the final sentence of Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code already cited. A dormant company left “en liquidation” for four years with no meeting is therefore not forgotten: the prosecutor, a creditor or a former partner can ask the court to finish it, at your cost. The Bordeaux Court of Appeal illustrated in April 2026 how a contested SAS dissolution between two 51/49 partners, with rival meetings and a disputed liquidator appointment, ends in years of litigation and a court-controlled exit instead of a quick filing (Bordeaux Court of Appeal, 4th Civil Chamber, 22 April 2026, RG 24/01679, official record at Cour de cassation database record 69e9afeacdc6046d47381fce). Settle the shareholder dispute before you vote the dissolution, in writing, with the price of the shares or the allocation of the surplus fixed.

A. File the last tax and social declarations and secure proof that nothing remains due

Tax comes first because the strike-off does not erase tax debts and the liquidator can be pursued for unpaid corporate tax (IS, impôt sur les sociétés) and VAT (TVA, taxe sur la valeur ajoutée) if distributions were made before payment. For income-tax companies the Code sets a short fuse: taxpayers must notify the administration within forty-five days of the transfer or cessation and file the immediate return on profits not yet taxed. The provision states in its opening words: “Dans le cas de cession ou de cessation, en totalité ou en partie, d’une entreprise industrielle, commerciale, artisanale, minière ou agricole, l’impôt sur le revenu dû en raison des bénéfices réalisés dans cette entreprise ou exploitation et qui n’ont pas encore été imposés est immédiatement établi”, with notice “dans un délai de quarante-cinq jours”. See Article 201 of the General Tax Code. For companies subject to corporate tax, the practical equivalent is a final IS return covering the liquidation period up to the closing date, plus the last VAT returns (CA3), the last DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly payroll return) if staff remained, the declaration of the liquidation surplus, and the CFE adjustment for the closure year. Ask your French accountant for a dated closure checklist with three columns: return name, period covered, proof of filing. From abroad, give the liquidator and the accountant a joint mandate in writing, with access to the professional mailbox, the bank statements and the payroll software, because the SIE (service des impôts des entreprises, the corporate tax office) writes only to the registered office. Two traps catch foreign groups. The first is VAT. A company that collected French VAT must file the last CA3 even for a nil period, request the VAT credit refund where due, and keep the evidence for the EU VAT refund network if the parent reclaims French VAT. A missing final CA3 blocks the INPI strike-off follow-up when the DGFIP flags the file. The second is the liquidation surplus. The boni paid to a foreign parent may bear French withholding, with treaty relief depending on the parent’s residence and the holding percentage. Model the withholding before you vote the distribution, not after the cash left France. On the social side, close the URSSAF account, file the last DSN, pay the last contributions for the liquidator’s fees where the liquidator is affiliated, and request the attestation de vigilance or final statement showing zero due. Keep the PDFs. Your bank will ask for them before releasing the share capital guarantee or closing the account. If the company employed staff, the liquidation does not remove dismissal, severance or employee-claim procedures. Settle employment contracts before the closing accounts, obtain signed receipts (reçus pour solde de tout compte), and keep the DPAE (déclaration préalable à l’embauche, the pre-hiring declaration) and pay-slip history. A buyer, a landlord or a new French partner will later ask for this history during due diligence on your next French venture.

B. Register the strike-off on the Guichet unique from abroad and prove the closure to banks and partners

The last company-law step is the radiation, the removal of the company from the RCS. The liquidator publishes the closing of the liquidation in a legal-notice support, then files the strike-off on the Guichet unique within one month of that publication, attaching the minutes approving the closing accounts, the certificate of publication, and the updated details. The technical filing frame is set by Article R123-3 of the Commercial Code, which lists the electronic file sent to the single body: the information entered by the declarant, the required digitised exhibits, and the proof of payment of fees. The INPI operational page confirms the portal path quoted in Part I and adds the timing: the liquidator then files the strike-off on the single portal during the month after the closing notice is published See again the INPI closing guide. After the greffe validates the file, the RCS entry disappears, a BODACC strike-off notice appears, and you can order the final proof: no Kbis anymore, but an extrait de radiation or a BODACC notice. From abroad, organise the evidence pack the day the strike-off appears. Your foreign bank, your French bank, your landlord, your insurer and your next French counsel will each ask for a different piece, and none of them reads French company law. Prepare a one-page English cover note with the French originals attached: the dissolution minutes and legal notice, the Kbis in liquidation, the closing minutes with quitus, the closing legal notice, the RCS strike-off proof and BODACC notice, the final IS and VAT filings with payment receipts, the URSSAF zero-balance statement, and the bank-closure letter. Keep the company books for the legal retention period even after strike-off, with a named custodian and address, because tax audits can arrive after closure and the former liquidator remains the contact. If the Guichet unique rejects the file, which happens often on first filing for missing powers, wrong corporate name without the liquidation mention, or an unsigned beneficial-owner update, do not refile a second dissolution. Correct the exhibit and refile the same event. Double dissolution filings create parallel RCS mentions and months of correction letters. If the company has no assets and no debts, the whole sequence from dissolution vote to strike-off often takes three to six months, most of it waiting for publications, tax receipts and the greffe queue. If debts remain and the company cannot pay them, stop the amicable path immediately. Amicable liquidation of an insolvent company exposes the liquidator and the former director to liability for late declaration of cessation of payments. The correct path is then the court-led insolvency filing (déclaration de cessation des paiements) before the tribunal des activités économiques, not a quiet distribution followed by a strike-off request that the greffe will refuse. Paris and Ile-de-France founders face the same national rules, with one local accent: the Paris greffe and the Paris SIE process high volumes, so file early in the month, answer Guichet unique messages within days, and keep a Paris address for service until the BODACC strike-off appears, even if the team already left France.

Conclusion

Winding up an SAS or SARL from another country is a paper chain where every link holds the next one: a dissolution vote that respects the majority rules of the statutes, a legal notice and a Guichet unique filing within one month, a liquidation phase that pays creditors before any distribution to the overseas parent, annual and closing accounts drawn up under Article L237-25 of the Commercial Code and Article L237-27 of the Commercial Code, final corporate-tax, VAT and URSSAF filings in line with Article 201 of the General Tax Code, then removal from the register within one month of the closing notice through the framework of Article R123-3 of the Commercial Code. The shortcut without a liquidation phase exists only for a one-member vehicle held by another legal person, under Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code with its thirty-day creditor opposition, and recent cases show creditors use that window. Build the file once, one version in English for the group and one in the registry language for the greffe, keep the Kbis in liquidation then the BODACC removal notice, the tax receipts and the social zero-balance statement together, and retain the books with a named custodian. A clean exit from France protects the next entry into France.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9269 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
2 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.