Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Registration Is Stuck and You Live Abroad: Guichet Unique Rejection, Kbis Delay and How to Unblock the File

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, you filed your French company online through the Guichet unique, and then silence. Days pass, then weeks, and still no Kbis. Or worse, an email arrives saying your file is incomplete, non-compliant or rejected, and your launch plan freezes: no bank account released, no lease signed, no invoices issued, no employee hired. This guide explains, for a foreign founder running the process from abroad, why French company registrations get stuck, which three documents cause almost every blockage, how to fix a rejection without flying to France, what your company in formation is legally allowed to do while you wait for the Kbis, and how to challenge a refusal that will not move. Every step is tied to the exact articles and court rulings a Paris lawyer would use, because in France registration is not paperwork, it is the legal birth of your company.

I. Why does your French company filing get rejected when the Guichet Unique checks everything before the Kbis exists?

A. How do you file a complete company registration from abroad and what does the single desk verify?

Since 1 January 2023, every business creation formality in France goes through one single online desk, the Guichet unique operated by the INPI, the French intellectual property and business formalities institute. There is no longer a separate counter at the commercial court registry for filing your company: one electronic file carries your declarations to the company register, the tax office, social security bodies and the statistical institute at once. Article L. 123-33 of the Commercial Code states: « Ce dossier est déposé par voie électronique auprès d’un organisme unique désigné à cet effet. » The same article adds the sentence that explains most rejections: « Ce dépôt vaut déclaration auprès du destinataire dès lors que le dossier est régulier et complet à l’égard de celui-ci. » Your filing counts as a declaration to each authority only if it is regular and complete for that authority. An application that looks finished on your screen can therefore be marked incomplete, sent back for correction, what the registry calls régularisation, or rejected outright, while the Kbis, the official company identity extract issued by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court, from the RCS, the Registre du commerce et des sociétés, the French trade and companies register, is simply not issued.

The single body that receives your file is defined by regulation. Article R. 123-1 of the Commercial Code provides: « L’organisme unique mentionné à l’article L. 123-33 permet aux entreprises de réaliser l’ensemble des formalités et procédures nécessaires à l’accès et à l’exercice de leur activité. » That file must contain everything each recipient requires. Article R. 123-3 of the Commercial Code states: « Le dossier mentionné à l’article L. 123-33 et transmis à l’organisme unique comprend les éléments suivants : » followed by the information entered by the filer, the supporting documents in digital form, and the proof of payment of the registry fees. For a commercial company, the official service-public.fr business portal currently lists a registration fee of 33.83 euros for the RCS plus 19.33 euros for the beneficial owners declaration, on top of the mandatory legal announcement, the annonce légale, the paid publication of your incorporation notice whose price varies by department and legal form. Keep every receipt, because a missing proof of payment alone can freeze the file, and our guide to setting up a company in France as a foreign founder, from bank account to Kbis, VAT and first hire walks through the full sequence in which each of these steps must arrive.

From abroad, the first practical trap is the signature. The file is electronic, but France does not accept a scanned handwritten signature or a click-wrap consent for every act. Article R. 123-5 of the Commercial Code provides: « Lorsqu’une signature est requise, le recours à une signature électronique avancée reposant sur un certificat qualifié est exigé dans les conditions prévues par le règlement (UE) n° 910/2014 du 23 juillet 2014 sur l’identification électronique et les services de confiance pour les transactions électroniques au sein du marché intérieur. » A foreign founder without a qualified electronic certificate therefore cannot always sign personally. The standard solution is a written power of attorney, a pouvoir, giving a French lawyer, accountant or filing agent, a formaliste, authority to sign and file for you, and that power itself must be uploaded in the correct format. Files signed with a non-compliant signature are among the most common causes of an immediate request for correction, and they cost weeks because each new upload restarts the registry review queue.

The second trap is the identity and integrity file for every director and shareholder. The service-public.fr portal lists, for each individual director, a copy of the identity document plus the original declaration sur l’honneur de non-condamnation et de filiation, the sworn statement that you have not been convicted of a crime barring company management, including your filiation, meaning the full names of your parents as shown on your birth certificate. Foreign founders regularly stumble here: the declaration must follow the French model wording, it must be signed, and the filiation details must match your civil records exactly. When the director is itself a foreign company, the portal requires a Kbis less than three months old of the parent company or, if that company is not registered in France, a document proving its existence, plus its articles translated into French and certified by its permanent representative, with the identity document of that representative. If you have not yet chosen between a subsidiary and a lighter presence, read our comparison of the SAS, the SARL and the branch as vehicles for a foreign founder in France before filing, because the vehicle determines which of these documents the registry will demand.

B. Why is your Kbis delayed: incomplete capital paperwork, weak domiciliation proof or a corporate shareholder file?

The single biggest cause of delay for foreign founders is the capital deposit certificate, the certificat de dépôt des fonds. French law requires the cash contributions to be paid up and frozen before registration, and the registry wants written proof. For the SARL, the limited liability company with intuitu personae, Article L. 223-7 of the Commercial Code provides: « Les parts représentant des apports en numéraire doivent être libérées d’au moins un cinquième de leur montant. » At least one fifth of the cash shares must be paid on day one. The same article continues: « La libération du surplus intervient en une ou plusieurs fois sur décision du gérant, dans un délai qui ne peut excéder cinq ans à compter de l’immatriculation de la société au registre du commerce et des sociétés. » For the SAS, the simplified joint-stock company most foreign founders choose, the cash shares must be paid up by at least half on incorporation, with the balance callable within five years, and the same proof logic applies at the registry window.

Where the money must sit, and who certifies it, is fixed by regulation. Article R. 223-3 of the Commercial Code provides: « Dans les huit jours de leur réception, les fonds provenant de la libération des parts sociales sont déposés pour le compte de la société en formation et par les personnes qui les ont reçus à la Caisse des dépôts et consignations, chez un notaire ou dans un établissement de crédit. » The funds must be deposited within eight days of receipt with the Caisse des dépôts et consignations, the state-owned public financial institution, a notary, or a bank, and the provision adds: « Mention de la libération des parts et du dépôt des fonds est portée dans les statuts. » The articles of association, the statuts, must themselves record the payment and the deposit. Foreign founders discover two problems here. First, French banks routinely refuse to open a capital deposit account for a non-resident without French tax numbers and proof of address, which is why so many files stall at this exact stage, a situation detailed in our guide to the French bank that refuses your company account while you live abroad, from capital deposit to release of the funds. Second, even when the money is deposited, founders forget to attach the deposit certificate, the bank or notary attestation, to the Guichet unique file, or the names on the certificate do not match the subscriber list in the statuts to the letter. Either defect stops the Kbis, and the funds stay frozen, because release requires the Kbis itself.

The second classic blocker is domiciliation, the registered address proof. The company must declare its siège social, its registered office, and prove it actually occupies or has the right to use the premises. A common foreign-founder shortcut is declaring the Paris apartment of a friend, an Airbnb, or a virtual address bought online without checking that the provider holds a préfectoral domiciliation licence. The registry rejects addresses without a proper lease, domiciliation contract with an authorised provider, or title deed, and a mismatch between the address in the statuts, the lease and the filing form is treated as an irregularity. French law does allow a light solution: a company may place its registered office at the home of its legal representative. Article L. 123-11-1 of the Commercial Code provides: « Toute personne morale est autorisée à installer son siège au domicile de son représentant légal et y exercer une activité, sauf dispositions législatives ou stipulations contractuelles contraires. » But the same article limits the fallback to five years from creation where a lease or co-ownership rule objects, requires prior written notice to the landlord or co-ownership syndicate, and warns that failure to report the new address to the greffe before expiry leads to radiation d’office, automatic striking off by the registrar. From abroad, the safe route is a real lease or a licensed domiciliation company whose contract and licence number are attached to the file, with the exact same address everywhere.

The third blocker concerns foreign corporate shareholders. When a British Ltd, a Delaware LLC or a Dubai holding company founds or co-founds the French entity, the registry applies the service-public.fr checklist strictly: recent company extract proving existence, articles translated into French and certified, identity of the permanent representative, and the non-conviction declaration of that representative. Translations by a bilingual friend are refused; the registry expects a traducteur assermenté, a sworn translator registered with a French court of appeal, and any foreign public document may additionally be asked to carry an apostille under the Hague Convention or consular legalisation, depending on the issuing country. Each missing or non-certified page generates a fresh correction request, and founders who answer from abroad by uploading the same uncertified document a second time simply collect a second rejection. Until the file is regular and complete, the legal consequence is absolute, and it is stated in one sentence. Article L. 210-6 of the Commercial Code provides: « Les sociétés commerciales jouissent de la personnalité morale à dater de leur immatriculation au registre du commerce et des sociétés. » No registration means no legal person, no capacity to contract, no VAT number, no payroll, however real your business already feels.

II. How do you unblock the registration and protect the business you signed while waiting for the Kbis?

A. How do you cure a rejection, authenticate foreign documents and complete the beneficial owners filing from abroad?

Start by reading the rejection or correction notice line by line, because the Guichet unique lists each defect separately and each needs its own cure. A demande de régularisation is not a refusal: it invites you to complete or correct within the stated time, and a complete answer on every point usually restarts the clock toward registration. A rejet or a declaration judged irrecevable is harder, and it generally requires a fresh corrected filing with a new fee payment. In both cases, work through the same checklist the registrar uses: identity of each director and shareholder, integrity declaration with exact filiation, capital deposit certificate matching the statuts, registered address proof with identical wording everywhere, legal announcement certificate, the attestation de parution issued by the authorised newspaper, fee receipts, and, where a foreign company is involved, its recent extract plus certified French translation of its articles. Never re-upload an unchanged document and hope; registrars compare the new file against the listed defects, and a second identical upload is treated as no answer at all.

Foreign documents deserve a method of their own. Commission the sworn translation first, because the translator will also flag whether the source document is complete, for example a full birth certificate showing filiation rather than a short extract. Then check authentication: within the Hague apostille system, a single apostille stamp from the issuing country authenticates the public document, while outside that system consular legalisation, a chain of stamps ending at the French consulate, may be required, and the registry occasionally asks for both the original and the translation to be uploaded together. Keep the file names explicit, passport-surname, statuts-translation-sworn, deposit-certificate-bank, so the reviewing agent finds each answer in seconds. From abroad, the most reliable accelerator remains a French-based mandataire with a standing qualified signature certificate who files, receives the registrar messages the same day, and cures within hours instead of discovering the message three weeks later in a spam folder.

The beneficial owners filing, the registre des bénéficiaires effectifs, the RBE, the register identifying the natural persons who ultimately control the company, is filed through the same single desk and causes its own share of blockages. Article L. 561-46 of the Monetary and Financial Code, in force at the date of writing, provides that the companies concerned « déclarent au registre du commerce et des sociétés, par l’intermédiaire de l’organisme mentionné au deuxième alinéa de l’article L. 123-33 du code de commerce, les informations relatives aux bénéficiaires effectifs. » The declaration covers identification details, personal domicile and the means of control, and foreign founders must understand that holding companies, trusts and layered ownership do not exempt them: every natural person above the 25 percent threshold or exercising control must be declared with supporting identification. An omitted or inconsistent RBE declaration suspends completion of the file, and the sanction goes beyond delay. Article L. 561-48 of the Monetary and Financial Code provides: « Le président du tribunal, d’office ou sur requête du procureur de la République ou de toute personne justifiant y avoir intérêt, peut enjoindre, au besoin sous astreinte, à toute société ou entité juridique mentionnée au premier alinéa de l’article L. 561-46 de procéder ou faire procéder soit aux déclarations des informations relatives au bénéficiaire effectif, soit à la rectification de ces informations lorsqu’elles sont inexactes ou incomplètes. » The court president can order the filing under a daily penalty payment, the astreinte, appoint an agent to complete it, and ultimately have the company struck off the register if it defies the order. Declare every ultimate owner from the first filing, and update the register whenever control moves, because a buyer, a bank or a public prosecutor can trigger the injunction years later.

Two preventive checks save more time than any cure. First, verify the company name before filing: the dénomination sociale, the corporate name, must not collide with an earlier trademark or company name, and the INPI company-data portal lets you search existing names in minutes. A name objection after filing forces amended statuts, a new legal announcement and a corrected filing. Second, confirm the regulated-activity question: hotels, security, finance, health, education and many other sectors need a prior authorisation, diploma or licence attached to the file under item 2 of article R. 123-1, and a company whose activity description implies a regulated trade without the licence is stopped immediately. File the activity wording your licence actually covers, neither broader nor narrower, because the tax and social bodies read the same description later.

B. What can your company in formation do before the Kbis arrives, and how do you challenge a refusal that will not move in Paris and the Île-de-France?

While the file is pending, your project exists in a precise legal status: the société en formation, the company in formation, which has founders but is not yet a person. The founders who act during this period carry personal risk. Article L. 210-6 of the Commercial Code continues: « Les personnes qui ont agi au nom d’une société en formation avant qu’elle ait acquis la jouissance de la personnalité morale sont tenues solidairement et indéfiniment responsables des actes ainsi accomplis, à moins que la société, après avoir été régulièrement constituée et immatriculée, ne reprenne les engagements souscrits. » Anyone who acts in the name of the company before registration is personally and jointly liable without limit, unless the company, once registered, takes over, reprend, the commitment, which is then deemed to have been made by the company from the start. Signing a lease, ordering stock or hiring in your own name while writing the company name on the document does not protect you; only the formal takeover after the Kbis moves the debt onto the company.

The takeover mechanism rewards founders who prepare it before registration. For joint-stock forms including the SAS, Article R. 210-6 of the Commercial Code provides: « Cet état est annexé aux statuts, dont la signature emporte reprise des engagements par la société, lorsque celle-ci a été immatriculée au registre du commerce. » A schedule listing every pre-registration act, with the obligation each creates for the company, is attached to the statuts, and signing the statuts itself operates as takeover once the Kbis arrives. The Cour de cassation polices this machinery strictly but pragmatically. In Com., 29 November 2023, No. 22-21.623, published in the Bulletin, the Commercial Chamber restates the foundation: « Il résulte des articles L. 210-6 et R. 210-6 du code de commerce que les sociétés commerciales jouissent de la personnalité morale à dater de leur immatriculation au registre du commerce et des sociétés. » The same ruling confirms the personal exposure on the merits: founders who acted for the company before registration stay jointly and indefinitely liable for what they signed, unless the duly formed and registered company takes over the commitments, which are then treated as the company’s own from day one. The Court adds that where the document does not expressly say it was signed for the company in formation, the trial judge examines all the circumstances to decide whether the parties truly intended to act for it. The lesson for a founder abroad is concrete: write on every pre-Kbis document that you sign in the name of and for the account of the named company in formation, keep the schedule of acts current, and make sure the signed statuts take them over, because an informal understanding never survives a dispute with a supplier who wants a solvent debtor.

The same strictness runs through all company forms. Article 1842, paragraph 1, of the Civil Code provides that companies other than partnerships without legal personality « jouissent de la personnalité morale à compter de leur immatriculation », enjoy legal personality from registration. In Civ. 3rd, 21 December 2023, No. 20-23.658, published in the Bulletin, the Third Civil Chamber partially quashed the Rouen appeal ruling in a dispute where a société civile that had never completed RCS registration was treated as having lost its legal personality, with ownership consequences following the loss. The message for commercial founders is identical: without the Kbis, the company cannot invoice with VAT, cannot hire, cannot open the definitive bank account, and cannot sue. Limit pre-registration acts to what is strictly necessary, fund them personally with your eyes open, and push the registration, not the business, as the priority.

In Paris and the Île-de-France, these fights follow concrete local rails. The competent registry is the greffe of the commercial court of the registered office: the Greffe du tribunal de commerce de Paris, on the Quai de la Corse, for a Paris siège, or the greffe of Nanterre, Bobigny or Créteil for the inner suburbs, and each applies its own documentary habits on top of the national checklist, so a file accepted in one registry can draw a correction request in another. Legal announcement rates are set per department and Paris is among the most expensive, which is why the attestation de parution must state the exact department of the siège. If the file is truly blocked, counsel in Paris can write to the registry, file a reasoned corrected declaration, and where the RBE or a declaration is at stake, petition the court president for directions rather than letting months pass. Foreign founders should also calendar the aftermath: once the Kbis arrives, the frozen capital is released against the Kbis, the SIREN numbers activate tax and social registrations, and the clock starts for the first beneficial-owners update, the first accounts and the first tax filings. A registration that took eight weeks instead of two is recoverable; a lease or employment contract signed in the wrong name during the gap can take years to fix.

Conclusion

A stuck French registration is almost never bad luck: it is an incomplete file, an unfrozen capital certificate, or an address the registry does not believe, examined by a single desk that can only say yes once everything is regular and complete. For a foreign founder, the method that works holds in four moves: file once, completely, through a qualified signature or a French mandataire, with the identity file, the matching capital certificate and the licensed address proof attached from day one; declare every ultimate beneficial owner immediately, because the court can order the filing under daily penalties and strike off a company that defies it; sign every pre-Kbis act expressly in the name of the company in formation and schedule it for takeover in the statuts, since founders otherwise remain personally liable without limit; and treat a correction request as a same-day emergency while preparing a reasoned corrected filing when the registry says no. The Kbis is the legal birth certificate of your French company, and everything profitable you plan, invoices, hires, premises, funding, flows from that single page.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago