Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Closing Your French Company From Abroad: Voluntary Dissolution, Liquidation, Strike-Off, Debts and Tax Clearance

You set up a French company from London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. It traded, hired, invoiced, paid its corporate tax. Now the project is over, the group is restructuring, or the French market never took off, and you want to shut the company down cleanly while you live thousands of kilometres away. Closing a French company is a two-stage legal operation with traps at every step: first the company is dissolved, then it is liquidated, and only then is it struck off the trade register. Each stage has its own vote, its own newspaper notice, its own online filing and its own tax return, and the company keeps a legal personality in between. This guide explains, for a foreign shareholder or director who cannot be in Paris every week, how to dissolve a French SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreigners choose) or SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company with stricter statutory rules), how the liquidator sells the assets and pays the creditors, how the final accounts are approved, and how the company is finally removed from the RCS (registre du commerce et des sociétés, the trade and companies register kept by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court). You will also learn when you are not allowed to use this friendly route at all: a company that cannot pay its debts must go through a court-led insolvency procedure instead, and trying to dissolve it quietly exposes the director to personal claims.

I. How Do You Dissolve a French SAS or SARL When You Live Abroad?

A. What Vote, What Papers and What Filing Close the Active Life of the Company?

Dissolution is the legal act that ends the active life of the company and opens the liquidation period. The Civil Code lists the possible causes of extinction of a company, and for a healthy company the relevant one is: “Par la dissolution anticipée décidée par les associés”, the early dissolution decided by the shareholders. In practice this means an extraordinary meeting of the shareholders, held in person or, if the articles of association (statuts) allow it, by video conference or written consultation, which votes the dissolution, appoints the liquidator and gives him his powers. Foreign shareholders can vote by proxy or by correspondence, which is how a founder living abroad keeps control of the timetable without flying to Paris. Check the majority rule before you convene. In a SAS the voting rules are freely set by the articles, so read them line by line: some SAS articles require unanimity for dissolution, and a vote taken at the wrong majority is void. In a SARL the rule is statutory (Article L.223-30 of the Commercial Code): “Toutes autres modifications des statuts sont décidées par les associés représentant au moins les trois quarts des parts sociales.” Early dissolution amends the articles, so it needs shareholders holding at least three quarters of the shares. The minutes (procès-verbal) must record the exact wording of the resolution, the number of votes, the date the dissolution takes effect, the full identity and address of the liquidator, and the address chosen for the liquidation, which is often the former registered office (siège social) or the liquidator’s office.

Once the vote is taken, the dissolution must be made public, because it is the publication that makes it effective against third parties. The Commercial Code states (Article L.237-2 of the Commercial Code): “La dissolution d’une société ne produit ses effets à l’égard des tiers qu’à compter de la date à laquelle elle est publiée au registre du commerce et des sociétés.” Three formalities follow in order. First, a dissolution notice is published in a SHAL (support habilité à recevoir des annonces légales, formerly called JAL, journal d’annonces légales), the official gazette authorised to carry legal notices in the département (administrative county) of the registered office; for a Paris company this is a Paris gazette, and the notice must state the company name, legal form, capital, registered office, RCS number, date of the vote and identity of the liquidator. Second, a single filing (dossier de dissolution) is submitted on the INPI guichet unique, the one-stop online portal run by the INPI (Institut national de la propriété industrielle) through which all company formalities now pass; the portal forwards the file to the greffe of the commercial court, which registers an amended Kbis (the official identity extract of the company) bearing the words in liquidation. Third, the amended Kbis is checked: from that day the company must trade, invoice and sign under its name followed by the words required by regulation (Article R.237-1 of the Commercial Code): “La mention ” société en liquidation ” ainsi que le nom du ou des liquidateurs doivent figurer sur tous les actes et documents émanant de la société et destinés aux tiers”. Every letter, invoice and contract signed during the liquidation must carry that mention and the liquidator’s name, and forgetting it is one of the small faults that later nourish creditors’ claims. Practical tip for the founder abroad: give the liquidator, who is often yourself or your French accountant or lawyer, a written delegation covering bank operations, tax filings and correspondence with the greffe, because banks freeze online access as soon as they learn of the dissolution and will only talk to the named liquidator. A related question many foreign founders ask at this stage is who runs the company while it winds down and what the director’s personal exposure is; our companion guide on directors’ status, social security and personal liability in France explains that side of the picture, and the official English-language page on voluntary cessation of a company confirms the sequence of vote, notice and filing described here.

Tax and social bodies must be told in parallel, not at the end. The SIE (service des impôts des entreprises, the corporate tax office of the DGFIP, the French tax administration) is informed through the same online filing, but the returns themselves have their own deadlines, explained in Part II. Employees, if any remain, are not an afterthought: employment contracts do not vanish with the dissolution vote, dismissals for closure follow the ordinary dismissal procedure with notice, severance and final documents, and unpaid wages rank as priority claims in the liquidation. The URSSAF (the social security collection agency) must be settled and the employer’s account closed, because contribution arrears survive the strike-off and can be pursued against the director who failed to declare them. Landlords deserve the same attention: a commercial lease (bail commercial) does not end automatically, the notice period must be served, the premises returned and the deposit recovered or offset, otherwise rent keeps running during the whole liquidation and eats the assets. In short, the dissolution stage is won or lost before the vote: a clear majority, complete minutes, a gazette notice without errors, a clean online filing, and letters to the bank, the staff, the landlord, the tax office and the social agencies. The most common failure seen in practice is a dissolution voted in London or New York, announced to nobody in France, while invoices, payroll charges and rent continue to accumulate against a company the founder already considers dead.

B. What If the Company Has a Single Shareholder, Heavy Losses, or Shareholders Who No Longer Speak to Each Other?

Three situations change the route completely, and foreign-owned companies meet them often. The first is the single-shareholder company: a SASU (SAS with one shareholder) or an EURL (SARL with one shareholder) owned 100 percent by the foreign parent or founder. There is no need to appoint a liquidator or to run a full liquidation. The Civil Code provides (Article 1844-5 of the Civil Code): “En cas de dissolution, celle-ci entraîne la transmission universelle du patrimoine de la société à l’associé unique, sans qu’il y ait lieu à liquidation.” The whole assets and liabilities pass automatically to the single shareholder in a TUP (transmission universelle du patrimoine, universal transfer of assets). The protection of creditors is built into the same article: “Les créanciers peuvent faire opposition à la dissolution dans le délai de trente jours à compter de la publication de celle-ci.” During those thirty days any creditor can object before the court, which can order immediate repayment or a guarantee; the transfer and the disappearance of the company only happen once the period expires or the objection is rejected. Note the trap for individuals: the fast TUP track described here applies when the single shareholder is a legal entity; where it is a natural person, the standard liquidation route must be used. For a foreign group closing its French subsidiary, the TUP is usually the cheapest and fastest exit, provided the subsidiary’s creditors, including the tax office and the URSSAF, are identified and paid or secured before the thirty days run out. Publication for a TUP is made the same way, through a legal notice and the online portal, and the Court regularly reminds practitioners that the thirty-day clock runs from proper publication, so a defective notice restarts the waiting period.

The second situation is the company with heavy losses. French law does not let shareholders sleep on a ruined balance sheet. The Commercial Code provides (Article L.223-42 of the Commercial Code): “Si, du fait de pertes constatées dans les documents comptables, les capitaux propres de la société deviennent inférieurs à la moitié du capital social, les associés décident, dans les quatre mois qui suivent l’approbation des comptes ayant fait apparaître cette perte s’il y a lieu à dissolution anticipée de la société.” Shareholders’ equity (capitaux propres) means net assets; when losses drag it below half of the share capital, the shareholders must vote within four months of approving those accounts on whether to dissolve early, publish their decision, and, if they choose to continue, rebuild the equity or reduce the capital within the statutory period. A foreign founder who discovers that his French SAS has two years of accumulated losses must therefore treat the next annual meeting as a fork in the road: either vote the dissolution while the company can still pay its debts, or vote continuation and actually re-inject money. Continuing without funds, while hoping the losses will reverse, is the classic path to personal liability, because the gap between half-capital proceedings and a court insolvency later looks, to a judge, like mismanagement. If the company is already unable to pay its debts as they fall due with its available assets, a state called cessation des paiements, the voluntary route is closed altogether: the debtor must request the opening of insolvency proceedings (Article L.631-4 of the Commercial Code) “au plus tard dans les quarante-cinq jours qui suivent la cessation des paiements”, within forty-five days of the cash-flow insolvency. Dissolving a company you know to be insolvent in order to avoid the insolvency court is a fault, and the liquidation that follows will be reclassified by the court, with the directors answering for the delay.

The third situation is deadlock: two fifty-fifty shareholders, a Franco-foreign joint venture where the partners no longer speak, a family company split by an inheritance. The Civil Code allows the court to order (Article 1844-7, 5° of the Civil Code): “Par la dissolution anticipée prononcée par le tribunal à la demande d’un associé pour justes motifs, notamment en cas d’inexécution de ses obligations par un associé, ou de mésentente entre associés paralysant le fonctionnement de la société”. The key word is paralysing: French courts do not dissolve a company only because the atmosphere is bad. The Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation confirmed this in a much-cited ruling of 16 March 2011 (No. 10-15.459), holding that “la mésentente existant entre les associés et par suite la disparition de l’affectio societatis ne pouvaient constituer un juste motif de dissolution qu’à la condition de se traduire par une paralysie du fonctionnement de la société”, meaning that disagreement, even with the loss of the shared will to work together (affectio societatis, the mutual intention to cooperate as partners), only justifies dissolution if it actually paralyses the company. In that case two equal co-managers of a property company who paid the bills each on their side and kept the building rented could not obtain dissolution, because the difficulties were “not serious enough to paralyse” operations. Contrast the Commercial Chamber’s ruling of 5 April 2018 (No. 16-19.829), decided under “Vu l’article 1844-7, 5° du code civil”, where dissolution was granted: lasting disagreement, total loss of trust between two family camps holding equal shares, a company-versus-tenants dispute unresolved after three years, rival projects filed with the town hall in the company’s name, and decisions only ever adopted through the manager’s casting vote. For the foreign shareholder locked in a French deadlock, the lesson is practical: collect written proof of paralysis (blocked meetings, unanswered convocations, contradictory acts signed in the company’s name, frozen accounts), because the judge will ask for the file, not the feelings. A negotiated buyout or a mediated dissolution voted together almost always costs less than a contested judicial dissolution, but the court route exists and works when paralysis is documented. Our guide to the annual legal calendar of a French company shows which yearly meetings and filings produce the paper trail that later proves, or disproves, paralysis.

II. How Do You Liquidate, Pay Creditors and Get Struck Off the Register?

A. How Does the Liquidator Sell Assets, Pay Debts and Report Each Year?

Dissolution opens liquidation automatically (Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code): “La dissolution de la société entraîne sa liquidation”. There is one famous exception, the TUP described above, and the general regime is then set by the Commercial Code (Article L.237-2 of the Commercial Code), which states that “La société est en liquidation dès l’instant de sa dissolution pour quelque cause que ce soit”, and that “La personnalité morale de la société subsiste pour les besoins de la liquidation, jusqu’à la clôture de celle-ci.” The company therefore survives as a legal person, but only to be wound up: it keeps its bank account, its debtors still owe it money, its creditors can still sue it, and the liquidator, not the former president or manager, is its only legal representative. The liquidator’s mandate is to realise the assets (sell stock, equipment, vehicles, assign the lease, collect receivables), terminate ongoing contracts, dismiss any remaining employees through the proper procedure, pay the creditors in their legal order of priority, and distribute any remainder to the shareholders. Secured and priority creditors come first: employees for their final wages and severance, the tax office and the URSSAF for arrears, banks holding pledges or guarantees, then ordinary unsecured suppliers. A liquidator who pays shareholders before creditors, or who favours one creditor over others of equal rank, commits a personal fault. The statute is blunt (Article L.237-12 of the Commercial Code): “Le liquidateur est responsable, à l’égard tant de la société que des tiers, des conséquences dommageables des fautes par lui commises dans l’exercice de ses fonctions.”

The Court of Cassation gives teeth to that liability. On 23 March 2010 (No. 09-13.666), the Commercial Chamber ruled, under “Vu les articles 1382 du code civil et L. 237-12 du code de commerce”, that “les dispositions du second de ces textes ne s’appliquent qu’aux personnes investies de la qualité de liquidateur d’une société dissoute”. In that case a dissolved building company had received money from customer-claimants under court decisions that were later overturned, the liquidator had failed to ring-fence the sums, and the heirs sued both the liquidator’s estate and the former manager. The Court quashed the conviction of the former manager precisely because he had never been appointed liquidator, which confirms the mirror principle: whoever is properly appointed liquidator answers for the funds, and whoever is not cannot be pursued on that ground. For the foreign founder this has two consequences. First, appoint the liquidator in writing in the dissolution minutes and publish the appointment, because only the published appointment proves who the liquidator is. Second, if you act as liquidator yourself from abroad, behave like one: open a liquidation file, keep every receipt, never mix company money with personal money, never distribute cash to yourself as shareholder before the creditors are paid, and place disputed sums beyond reach until the dispute ends. Courts also sanction the idle liquidator: where the liquidation drags on, the Civil Code warns (Article 1844-8 of the Civil Code) that “Si la clôture de la liquidation n’est pas intervenue dans un délai de trois ans à compter de la dissolution, le ministère public ou tout intéressé peut saisir le tribunal, qui fait procéder à la liquidation ou, si celle-ci a été commencée, à son achèvement.” Three years is therefore the practical ceiling, and the INPI’s official closing guide repeats that the dissolution phase cannot in principle last more than three years.

During those years the liquidator must report like a director. The Commercial Code requires (Article L.237-25 of the Commercial Code): “Le liquidateur, dans les trois mois de la clôture de chaque exercice, établit les comptes annuels au vu de l’inventaire qu’il a dressé des divers éléments de l’actif et du passif existant à cette date”. Each year he draws up an inventory of what is left, prepares annual accounts, writes a report on the liquidation operations of the year, and convenes the shareholders at least once a year within six months of year-end to approve the accounts, grant the necessary authorisations and renew the auditors if any. If the meeting is not held, the report must be filed at the greffe and communicated to anyone interested, and a liquidator who neglects these duties can be stripped of part of his fees and removed. For a founder living abroad, the yearly meeting is best held by video or written consultation if the articles allow it, with the accounts prepared by the French accountant, signed by the liquidator and filed on time; a liquidation with no yearly accounts looks, in a later dispute, like a liquidation with something to hide. Practical points often missed: keep the company’s insurance running until the last asset is sold, because a dissolved company remains liable for damage its property causes; keep the registered office address valid, because the greffe, the tax office and the courts serve papers there, and uncollected mail does not stop deadlines from running; and keep the bank account open in the company’s name with the liquidation mention until the final distribution, because closing it early makes the last payments and the tax refunds technically difficult. Where the company owns real estate, the sale follows ordinary conveyancing with a notary (notaire), and any remaining lease must be formally terminated, since rent arrears declared late by the landlord still rank in the liquidation.

B. How Do You Approve the Final Accounts, Pay the Last Tax and Obtain the Strike-Off?

When everything is sold and every known creditor is paid or secured, the liquidator calls the shareholders for the last time. The Commercial Code provides (Article L.237-9 of the Commercial Code): “Les associés, y compris les titulaires d’actions à dividende prioritaire sans droit de vote, sont convoqués en fin de liquidation pour statuer sur le compte définitif, sur le quitus de la gestion du liquidateur et la décharge de son mandat et pour constater la clôture de la liquidation.” Three votes are therefore taken together: approval of the final liquidation accounts, discharge (quitus) of the liquidator’s management, and formal recording of the closure of the liquidation. If a shareholder refuses to attend, any shareholder can ask the court to appoint an agent to convene the meeting, so one absent or hostile minority cannot block the ending forever. The minutes of this final meeting are the most important document of the whole file: they state the final cash position, the amounts distributed to each shareholder, and the fact that the liquidator is discharged. Refuse the quitus only if you have a real grievance, because granting it and later suing the liquidator for facts known at the time is difficult. The closure decision is then published in the same SHAL gazette, and a final filing (dossier de radiation) is submitted on the INPI guichet unique: final minutes, updated accounts, proof of the gazette notice and the liquidator’s declaration. The greffe removes the company from the RCS, and the strike-off (radiation) is announced in the BODACC (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements), which is the public death certificate of the company. Keep the BODACC notice and the final Kbis marked radiated: banks, landlords and foreign registries sometimes ask for proof years later, and the company number can be reactivated in disputes about forgotten liabilities.

Tax is the second half of the ending, and it has its own calendar. Dissolution accelerates everything: the Tax Code states (Article 221 of the General Tax Code) that in such cases “l’impôt sur les sociétés est établi dans les conditions prévues aux 1 et 3 de l’article 201”, corporate income tax being assessed under the cessation rules. Concretely, the company must notify the tax office of the cessation within forty-five days and then: “Les contribuables assujettis à un régime réel d’imposition sont tenus de faire parvenir à l’administration, dans un délai de soixante jours déterminé comme indiqué au 1, la déclaration de leur bénéfice réel accompagnée d’un résumé de leur compte de résultat.” Within sixty days the company files its final profit declaration with a summary of its income statement, covering the period from the start of the financial year to the dissolution date, plus a second declaration later for the liquidation period itself up to closure (Article 201 of the General Tax Code). If the declarations are missing, the tax office assesses the bases itself (taxation d’office), which is always worse than declaring. VAT follows the same logic: a final VAT return (CA3 for monthly filers, CA12 for the simplified annual regime) up to the cessation date, possible regularisations on fixed assets sold or kept, and a request to close the VAT account; businesses that made intra-EU supplies file their last recapitulative statement (état récapitulatif) and Intrastat responses (enquête EMEBI) where applicable. The local business tax (CFE, cotisation foncière des entreprises) is due for the year of closure with relief only in narrow cases, so budget for it. Where the liquidation leaves a surplus distributed to shareholders (boni de liquidation, the liquidation surplus), that surplus is taxed as distributed income in the shareholders’ hands under their own regime: French-resident individuals face the standard dividend regime, non-residents face a withholding tax whose rate depends on the applicable tax treaty, and a foreign parent company checks its treaty and the French participation rules before repatriating the cash. The DGFIP’s official guidance for professionals on impots.gouv.fr details each return, and the company should request a full tax clearance letter (quitus fiscal) and keep proof of every filing, because an unclosed tax file is the most frequent cause of a strike-off that never quite finishes.

Social and administrative closures run alongside. The employer’s URSSAF account is closed once the last payroll declaration (DSN, déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly electronic payroll return) and the final contributions are paid; certificates of employment, final payslips and the unemployment attestation for France Travail (the public employment service) must have been delivered to each dismissed employee, since missing documents generate claims that reopen the file. Pension and complementary schemes (Agirc-Arrco for executives and staff) are notified. The commercial court file is closed at the greffe, the company’s records, accounts and payroll data are archived for the statutory retention periods, and the liquidator keeps a complete closing binder: dissolution minutes, gazette notices, Kbis in liquidation, yearly accounts, final minutes, radiation Kbis and BODACC notice, tax returns and clearance, social certificates. From abroad, the safest organisation is a single shared folder with the accountant holding originals in France and the founder holding certified copies, because nobody wants to search for a 2026 payroll slip in 2032. One last warning specific to foreign founders: do not confuse strike-off with disappearance of debts. Creditors who were never informed of the liquidation, or whose claims were ignored, can still sue the former shareholders within the limits of the sums distributed and pursue the liquidator personally for his faults; tax reassessments can reach back within the statute of limitations; and a creditor who discovers that the company was already insolvent when it was dissolved can ask the court to open insolvency proceedings afterwards. A clean file with published notices, paid creditors, filed returns and a voted quitus is the only real protection, and it is also what makes the whole operation cost less than the dispute it prevents.

Conclusion

Closing a French company from abroad follows a fixed order: vote the early dissolution at the right majority, publish the notice in the legal gazette, file on the INPI portal and obtain the Kbis in liquidation; then let the liquidator sell, collect, pay the creditors in rank order and report every year; then vote the final accounts, grant or refuse the discharge, publish the closure, file the strike-off and collect the BODACC notice; and at every stage file the matching tax and social returns within their forty-five and sixty-day deadlines. Single-shareholder groups use the faster universal transfer with its thirty-day creditor objection period; loss-making companies face the half-capital vote within four months; deadlocked partners must prove real paralysis before a judge will dissolve; and insolvent companies belong to the insolvency court within forty-five days, never to a quiet voluntary dissolution. Run from another country, the operation succeeds when one person in France, the liquidator with a written mandate, holds the calendar, the mailbox and the bank access, and when every step leaves a published trace. Kept documents are then what they have always been in French company law: the difference between a company that is truly closed and a file that wakes up years later.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
2 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago