Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Article généré par une intelligence artificielle, selon un processus conçu et contrôlé par le cabinet

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

You Run Your French SAS From Abroad: Director Pay, French Social Charges, Health Cover and How to Challenge the Bill

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, and you have just registered a French company. The Kbis (the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe, the registry office of the commercial court) names you as president. The bank asks for your pay slips. Your accountant in Paris mentions URSSAF (the network of bodies collecting social security contributions) and the DSN (the monthly online payroll return called déclaration sociale nominative). Then a letter arrives: social contributions are due on your director pay, with surcharges. You do not live in France, you hold no French health card, you never signed a French employment contract, and you wonder what this bill has to do with you. This article answers that question from start to finish. It explains every French acronym in plain English, shows when a foreign director really owes French social charges and when the claim is wrong, compares the president of a SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) with the manager of a SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited-liability company with a stricter statutory frame), details the true cost of director pay including income tax and company deductibility, clarifies what health cover you actually obtain for that money, and gives a step-by-step method to challenge a reassessment from abroad. Readers setting up their structure will also benefit from our general guide on setting up a company in France as a foreign founder, which covers the bank account, the Kbis and VAT registration. The stakes are concrete: unpaid contributions generate a 5 percent increase plus 0.4 percent per additional month, block your attestation de vigilance (the compliance certificate large clients and public buyers demand), and can follow the director personally. Read on before you pay and before you ignore the letter.

French law starts from a blunt principle. Article L. 311-2 of the Social Security Code provides: « Sont affiliées obligatoirement aux assurances sociales du régime général, quel que soit leur âge et même si elles sont titulaires d’une pension, toutes les personnes quelle que soit leur nationalité, de l’un ou de l’autre sexe, salariées ou travaillant à quelque titre ou en quelque lieu que ce soit, pour un ou plusieurs employeurs et quels que soient le montant et la nature de leur rémunération, la forme, la nature ou la validité de leur contrat ou la nature de leur statut. » The rule covers everyone working in France whatever their nationality, whatever the contract label, and whatever the pay. The rest of this guide shows how that rule reaches a director who lives abroad, where its limits sit, and how judges apply it.

I. Do You Owe French Social Charges When You Direct a French Company From Abroad?

A. Are Presidents of a SAS Covered Like Employees Even When They Live Abroad?

Short answer: yes, as soon as you are paid for directing a French SAS, you fall under the French general social security scheme by assimilation, even if you live outside France and even if you hold no employment contract. The company itself is defined by Article L. 227-1 of the Commercial Code: « Une société par actions simplifiée peut être instituée par une ou plusieurs personnes qui ne supportent les pertes qu’à concurrence de leur apport. » Shareholders risk only their contributions, but the person who runs the vehicle is pulled into the social security net the moment pay is attached to the mandate. The bridge is Article L. 311-3 of the Social Security Code, whose paragraph 23 lists: « Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et des sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées ». Those words mean the president and the executive officers of a SAS are brought inside compulsory coverage. The Cour de cassation (the supreme court for civil and criminal matters, whose rulings unify case law nationwide) confirmed the reading on 5 June 2025 in decision number 23-13.887, published at Cour de cassation, 2nd civil chamber, 5 June 2025, no. 23-13.887: « Selon l’article L. 311-3, 23°, du code de la sécurité sociale, dans sa rédaction applicable au litige, sont obligatoirement affiliés aux assurances sociales du régime général les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et de sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées. » A second ruling sharpens the point for pay treatment: on 15 May 2025, decision number 23-13.763, published at Cour de cassation, 2nd civil chamber, 15 May 2025, no. 23-13.763, the Court described the director as follows: « ce dirigeant était assujetti par assimilation au régime général en sa qualité de président d’une société par actions simplifiée ». Assimilated, not employed: you are treated like an employee for social security without being an employee under labour law. That distinction drives everything else. You get a pay slip, the company files a DSN each month, contributions flow to URSSAF, and you build rights in the general scheme, but you have no employment contract, no protection against dismissal, no severance, and no unemployment insurance with France Travail (the public employment service), because unemployment cover requires a genuine subordination relationship that a corporate mandate lacks.

Living abroad does not switch this off by itself. What matters is where the directing work is performed and under which legislation you remain covered. If you fly to Paris two weeks a month, sign contracts there, manage staff there and attend board meetings there, the French scheme claims you for the pay attached to that French activity, even if your home, your family and your personal tax residence sit in another country. Tax residence and social security affiliation obey different maps: you can be tax resident in the United Kingdom and still affiliated in France for your French director pay. Inside the European Union, the European Economic Area and Switzerland, coordination rules prevent double coverage: the A1 certificate (attestation de détachement ou de pluriactivité) proves you stay under one Member State scheme, and the employer must hold it before invoking it against URSSAF. A director who already pays full employee contributions in Germany for a genuine parallel activity may, with the correct A1, keep that single affiliation for overlapping periods, but a letter asserting foreign residence alone proves nothing. Outside the EU, bilateral social security conventions decide; the French-American convention, for example, contains a detachment clause of limited duration, while many corridors such as the Emirates or Singapore have no convention at all, so French affiliation applies in full to French-source director pay. The practical test URSSAF inspectors run is documentary: the Kbis showing your appointment, publication in the BODACC (the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements), board minutes fixing pay, bank transfers labelled salary or management pay, DSN filings or their absence, travel records, and the M2 company form (formulaire M2) filed with the guichet unique (the INPI single online business desk, see INPI) declaring you as director. In the 5 June 2025 case the court relied on exactly that bundle: the BODACC entry presenting the person as empowered to bind the company, the M2 form designating him as director, and a proven power to choose investments. Founders who appear everywhere as the decision-maker cannot credibly claim they direct nothing.

Three exceptions genuinely exist, and each must be documented before URSSAF calls. First, the unpaid mandate: a president who receives strictly zero pay, zero benefit in kind, zero reimbursed flat-rate allowance and zero dividend reclassified as pay owes no general-scheme contributions on the mandate, because the charge attaches to remuneration, not to the title. The company must still be able to show clean minutes stating the mandate is unpaid, a full year of bank statements with no transfer to the director, and consistent DSN records. One bonus or one car paid by the company destroys the defence for the whole period. Second, the genuinely supervisory role: a person titled honorary president or supervisory-board chairman who only controls management without running it is in principle outside coverage, as the 5 June 2025 ruling recalls, unless URSSAF proves real direction functions exercised independently. Third, proven single foreign affiliation inside coordination rules: a valid A1 or convention certificate covering the exact reassessed period, produced in its original form with dates matching the pay. Note the asymmetry with health rights: affiliation without French residence creates contribution duties immediately but opens French health benefits only if you actually reside or work in France and register with the CPAM (the local health insurance fund, caisse primaire d’assurance maladie). Paying from Dubai does not create a French carte Vitale (the green health insurance card) in your mailbox. If you hold no French residence and no detached-worker status, the money funds the French system without opening French care, which is exactly why the pay-versus-dividend calculation in Part II matters so much before you set a salary level.

B. What Changes If You Chose a SARL With a Majority Manager Instead?

Everything changes if your company is a SARL and you are its majority manager (gérant majoritaire). Article L. 223-18 of the Commercial Code states: « La société à responsabilité limitée est gérée par une ou plusieurs personnes physiques. » Those physical persons, when they together hold more than half of the capital, are not assimilated employees at all: they belong to the self-employed scheme for non-agricultural independent workers. The compass is Article L. 611-1 of the Social Security Code, which opens the independent-workers book to non-salaried workers, and Article L. 131-6 of the Social Security Code, which provides: « Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues par les travailleurs indépendants non agricoles ne relevant pas du dispositif prévu à l’article L. 613-7 sont assises sur l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-3. » In plain terms, the majority manager pays contributions on professional earnings as defined for income tax, with no pay slip, no DSN for the mandate, and a direct call for payment from URSSAF each year with provisional instalments followed by a final adjustment once the real income is known. The rates look lower than the 45 to 75 percent all-in cost of an assimilated SAS president, often landing near 35 to 45 percent at modest income levels, but the cover is thinner: daily sickness allowances only after a waiting period and under conditions, a lighter disability and death scheme, retirement through the independent-workers branch with fewer supplementary points per euro at high incomes, and, crucially, no unemployment insurance either. Since 2020 the health side of the independent scheme has been handled inside the general scheme by the CPAM, so the manager does receive care through the same counters, but contributions, control and collection remain specific, and minimum flat contributions apply even in a loss-making year. A foreign founder who lives abroad and manages a profitable Paris SARL from a distance therefore pays French independent-worker contributions on the management earnings with almost no French benefit to show for it, exactly like the SAS president, unless coordination rules say otherwise.

The borderline cases decide most reassessments, so learn the three tests inspectors apply. First, the capital test: minority or equal-share managers of a SARL fall back into the general scheme under Article L. 311-3, paragraph 11, which covers managers who together hold no more than half of the capital, counting shares held by spouse, civil partner and minor children as held by the manager. Marry a 50-50 split with a spouse holding 1 percent and the manager flips to majority status retroactively. Second, the cumulation test: a SAS president who also holds a genuine employment contract for separate technical functions keeps two tracks, pay slip for the job plus mandate pay for the office, but URSSAF and courts require real subordination for the job track, distinct duties, distinct pay and actual leave taken; the 15 May 2025 ruling shows courts rejectingrank-and-file labels when the person was in truth only a director, denying the executive departure indemnity regime attached to employee status. Third, the dividend test: dividends paid to an assimilated SAS president on shares held personally are not subject to social contributions, which makes them attractive, but URSSAF reclassifies disguised pay labelled as dividends, management fees invoiced from a foreign vehicle, or current-account interest at abnormal rates. Keep the paper trail clean: shareholder resolutions distributing a real profit after approval of the accounts, bank wires labelled dividends with the withholding form 2777 filed when non-resident withholding applies, and no monthly flat dividend mimicking a salary. Foreign founders often ask whether a SARL or a SAS costs less for a director living abroad. The honest answer: at zero or low pay the SARL costs more because of minimum independent-worker contributions, while at high pay the SAS costs more in percentage terms but buys a better pension record and simpler monthly processing through payroll software. Model both tracks over three years with your accountant before choosing, because converting a SARL into a SAS later (transformation) resets mandates, pay slips and affiliation files, and URSSAF will ask who did what and when during the changeover year.

II. How Much Does a Foreign Director Really Cost and How Do You Fix a Wrong Bill?

A. How Is Director Pay Taxed and Charged in Practice: Payslip, CSG-CRDS, Income Tax and Dividends?

Take a concrete case: your Paris SAS pays you 60,000 euros gross per year as president while you live in London and fly in monthly. The company draws a monthly pay slip, withholds employee contributions of roughly 22 to 25 percent, adds employer contributions of roughly 42 to 45 percent, and declares everything through the DSN on the 5th or 15th of each month. The all-in employer cost lands near 85,000 to 90,000 euros, of which 25,000 to 30,000 euros flow to URSSAF, the AGIRC-ARRCO supplementary pension scheme and the other collectors. On top of social charges come the CSG-CRDS (the general social contribution and the contribution to the repayment of social debt levied on earnings), income tax under Article 62 of the General Tax Code, which provides: « Les traitements, remboursements forfaitaires de frais et toutes autres rémunérations sont soumis à l’impôt sur le revenu au nom de leurs bénéficiaires s’ils sont admis en déduction des bénéfices soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés par application de l’article 211 », and the company-side deduction of the pay against corporate profit taxed at Article 219 of the General Tax Code: « Le taux normal de l’impôt est fixé à 25 %. » Pay is therefore deductible for the company within the standard 25 percent corporate tax, taxable in your hands under the applicable treaty, and chargeable for social purposes in France when the work sits in France. Non-resident directors often discover the French withholding on top: salaries for work physically performed in France remain taxable in France under most treaties, with the DINER (the non-resident tax office, direction des impôts des non-résidents) and the annual non-resident return 2041-E, filed through impots.gouv.fr, deciding the final position. Dividends follow a different road: distributed from after-tax profit, they carry no French social charges for the assimilated president, but suffer corporate tax first, then the 25 percent non-resident withholding under domestic law, reduced by treaty to 15, 12.8 or sometimes 0 percent with form 5000 filed in time, plus the individual levy. A 60,000 euro profit paid as dividends instead of salary can therefore cost the group 15,000 euros of corporate tax plus 6,000 to 15,000 euros of withholding, against 25,000 to 30,000 euros of social charges plus income tax on the salary road. Neither road dominates in every case; the mix depends on your residence treaty, your need for French pension quarters, and whether you need pay slips for a future visa, mortgage or school file.

Health cover deserves a cold-eyed paragraph because founders overpay for illusions here. An assimilated SAS president with a French pay slip and French residence registers with the CPAM, obtains a social security number, and accrues sickness, maternity and pension rights like any executive; the employer must also offer the company supplementary health plan (mutuelle d’entreprise) under Article L. 911-7 of the Social Security Code, which organises minimum employer-funded complementary health cover. But the same pay slip without French residence opens almost no care: no CPAM registration without a stable home, no reimbursements for treatment in London or Dubai, and no dispensation from the health system of your home country. Some founders imagine the French contributions buy worldwide cover; they do not. If you work partly in France under detachment, the S1 or A1 form keeps your home cover for care received in France, and the CFE (caisse des Français de l’étranger, the voluntary fund for French nationals abroad) can top up specific situations, but it is voluntary, contributory and never automatic. Practical consequences follow. First, do not set a high French salary solely to buy health rights you will never use; a lean pay with documented dividends often serves a non-resident better. Second, if you do relocate to Paris or the inner suburbs, register with the CPAM of your arrondissement within days, keep the lease, the passport stamp and the first pay slip together, and choose the company mutuelle before the deadline stated in the unilateral employer decision. Third, never confuse the director mandate with an employment contract when claiming benefits: the 15 May 2025 ruling refused the executive retirement indemnity to a president precisely because assimilation is not employment. Keep every status in its lane, mandate pay on mandate minutes and pay slips, contract pay on contract and time sheets, and dividends on shareholder resolutions after the annual accounts (assemblée générale d’approbation des comptes) are signed.

B. Your Company Received a URSSAF Reassessment and You Live Abroad: How Do You Challenge It Step by Step?

Most files start the same way: an inspection notice, a long silence, then a redressement letter (lettre d’observations) listing undeclared director pay, reclassified dividends or missing DSN periods, with a 30-day window to reply. Article R. 243-59 of the Social Security Code guarantees the opening move: « Tout contrôle effectué en application de l’article L. 243-7 est précédé, au moins trente jours avant la date de la première visite de l’agent chargé du contrôle, de l’envoi par l’organisme effectuant le contrôle des cotisations et contributions de sécurité sociale d’un avis de contrôle. » No notice, except in undeclared-work cases, means the whole procedure wobbles; check the date on the notice against the date of the first visit before anything else. Then work the file in order. First, freeze the calendar: the observations letter gives you 30 days to answer and to request an extension, which inspectors routinely grant once when asked in writing with a reason such as gathering foreign payroll records. Answer inside the window even from abroad, by registered letter with acknowledgment or through the company accountant’s formal reply, addressing each head of reassessment line by line: mandate pay acknowledged with pay slips attached, supervisory role documented with minutes showing no management power, A1 certificate attached for the exact months claimed, dividend distributions defended with shareholder minutes and proof of real profit. Silence at this stage is treated as agreement and resurfaces later before the judge. Second, use the contradictory exchange: the inspector must reply to your observations before any final bill, and any head of reassessment abandoned or reduced there cannot quietly return. Third, when the mise en demeure (the formal demand to pay) arrives, read the amounts, periods and surcharge computation, and file the prior administrative appeal with the CRA (commission de recours amiable, the friendly-appeals board of the URSSAF) within the stated deadline, usually two months, attaching everything again because the board reads the file fresh. Fourth, if a contrainte (the enforceable collection order served by a commissaire de justice, the enforcement officer formerly called huissier) is served, file an opposition before the judicial social chamber (pôle social) of the competent judicial court within 15 days of service, and nowhere else: an opposition sent only to URSSAF does not stop enforcement. State in the opposition the exact sums contested, the periods, and the grounds, because a blanket I contest everything is routinely declared inadmissible. Each step suspends or channels collection differently, so note every date of receipt on the envelope and on the server report, keep the French originals, and never let a deadline run while waiting for a translated summary.

Distance adds friction at three points, and each has a fix. Language: URSSAF writes only in French, and the CRA and the court accept only French pleadings; appoint a French-speaking representative early, give a written mandate, and file translations of foreign payroll or posting certificates with the originals attached, because the inspector cannot be faulted for ignoring a document he cannot read. Proof: foreign evidence carries weight only when it is dated, signed and consistent; a German A1 covering January to June answers a January-to-June claim, while a Berlin employment contract without hours, duties or pay slips answers nothing. Send the full chain: foreign contract, foreign pay slips, foreign contribution receipts, travel diary, board calendar, and the French minutes fixing or denying mandate pay. Forum: for a Paris-registered company the competent bodies sit in the Paris region, typically URSSAF Île-de-France for collection and the Paris judicial court social chamber for opposition, with hearings that can sometimes be prepared in writing but rarely by video; budget one trip or a properly mandated counsel rather than discovering the rule a week before the hearing. Five mistakes lose most cases: answering the observations letter late; paying the mise en demeure in full and then asking the judge for a refund on the same grounds without a proper appeal; opposing the contrainte before the wrong body or after 15 days; invoking an A1 that covers different months than the reassessment; and mixing mandate pay with dividends in the same wire with the same label. If the reassessment is well founded, negotiate in the right order instead: request a payment plan (échéancier) from URSSAF with cash-flow proof, ask the director of the body for a partial waiver of surcharges (remise des majorations) once principal is paid or scheduled, and correct the DSN and the minutes going forward so the next inspection finds a clean file. A reassessment letter is the start of a procedure with rules, not a final invoice, and directors who answer precisely, in French, on time and with matching documents recover significant sums every month.

Conclusion

If you direct a French company while living abroad, remember five operational truths. First, paid direction of a SAS triggers French general-scheme affiliation by assimilation under Article L. 311-3, paragraph 23, whether or not you reside in France and whether or not you hold an employment contract, as the Cour de cassation restated on 5 June and 15 May 2025. Second, the SARL majority-manager road runs through the independent-workers scheme under Articles L. 611-1 and L. 131-6, with no pay slip, yearly instalments and minimum contributions even in lean years. Third, price the two roads over three years before choosing: a 60,000 euro SAS salary costs the group 25,000 to 30,000 euros in charges for real pension and health rights that only materialise with French residence, while dividends escape social charges but suffer corporate tax at 25 percent plus non-resident withholding under your treaty. Fourth, health rights follow residence and registration, not contributions alone: without a French home and a CPAM file, French pay does not buy French care, so set salary levels for what they truly purchase. Fifth, every URSSAF dispute follows a timed track, 30 days to answer the observations, administrative appeal to the CRA, and 15 days to oppose a contrainte before the social chamber, with French-language documents and matching dates deciding the outcome. Put the minutes, the Kbis, the BODACC print, the M2 form, the pay slips, the dividend resolutions and any A1 certificate in one file today, and the next letter from Paris becomes a manageable procedure instead of a crisis.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9274 Google reviews
kader ladjouzi
3 weeks ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
7 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.

Fatima Arbouhi
7 months ago

Excellent real estate lawyer. Professional, responsive and attentive, he perfectly met my expectations and accompanied me with great seriousness throughout my case. I highly recommend his services.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law in Paris requires constant attention, each situation is unique and deserves support that meets the mark. Your recommendation gives us great pleasure.

Jean-François PAPA
1 day ago

Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement Maître Esther Cornu pour son professionnalisme, sa disponibilité et la qualité de son accompagnement. Dans le cadre d’un dossier particulièrement important pour mon avenir professionnel, elle a su faire preuve d’une grande réactivité, de rigueur et de pédagogie, en prenant le temps de répondre précisément à mes interrogations et de m’expliquer les différentes démarches juridiques. J’apprécie tout particulièrement la clarté de ses analyses, son sérieux et son implication dans le suivi de mon dossier. Un grand merci à Maître Esther Cornu pour son écoute et son accompagnement. Je recommande vivement !

Hamid Agouz
5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness of Monsieur Reda Cohen, who took the time to answer my questions regarding my case immediately. It has become so rare nowadays to find a lawyer who is so available, responsive, and attentive, even when it simply comes to answering inquiries. His answers are clear, precise, and reassuring. You can really feel that he takes the time to understand the situation and provide relevant answers. Beyond his excellent Google reviews, it is above all this availability and thoroughness that make all the difference. A huge thank you to Monsieur Reda Cohen for his professionalism and responsiveness. I highly recommend him!

Translated from French

Sandra Imbert
6 days ago

A huge thank you to Maître Esther Cornu from Kohen Avocats for her support during a particularly difficult time. Her attentiveness, empathy, and humanity touched me deeply. She was able to answer my questions with clarity and sensitivity, while demonstrating great professionalism and fully respecting the confidentiality of the case. Beyond her professional qualities, I met a deeply humane lawyer whose support made a real difference. I sincerely recommend her.

Translated from French

Salon Sisters
1 week ago

Thank you, Maître Kohen, for your professionalism, responsiveness, and dedication. You handled my case perfectly with great attentiveness, rigor, and efficiency. I was very satisfied with your support and the work accomplished. I recommend him without hesitation!

Translated from French

Djamel Haddouche
1 week ago

I am facing a dispute with my employer, and the support provided by Maître Hassan COHEN as well as Maître Esther Cornu is excellent. The answers are clear and well-thought-out, they genuinely listen, and interactions are very pleasant. Thank you again, I highly recommend.

Translated from French

Frederic Lopes
1 week ago

Excellent professional. I highly recommend for their dedication and expertise.

Translated from French

Nima Sdc
2 weeks ago

A law firm that is attentive to its clients. Maître Kohen and his team are very, very professional and truly master their field.

Translated from French

Amir
7 months ago

Excellent expertise in real estate law from Me Reda Kohen

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you for this feedback. Real estate law is a field that leaves no room for approximation, and it is this high standard that guides our work. Your recognition honors us.

Krep Events Traiteur Breton
2 days ago

The article is very clear.

Translated from French

TOULEIMAT HACHEM
3 days ago
emilie lepicard
1 week ago
Zakaria Airbnb
1 week ago
إبراهيم عيسى
1 week ago
Gabriele
2 weeks ago