Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Driver Hurt in a Car Crash in France After Brexit: the Insurer Offer, the Fault Trap, and How to Challenge From the UK

You set off from Folkestone at dawn, crossed through the tunnel with the boot packed to the roof, and by mid-afternoon you are bowling down the A26 towards Reims in your right-hand-drive estate when a French articulated lorry drifts across the white line on a rain-slick bend and shoves you into the crash barrier. The airbags fire, the children are screaming in the back, a passing motorist calls the gendarmerie, and within the hour you are sitting in the urgences, the accident and emergency department, with a fractured wrist, a neck brace and a head full of questions. You are a British driver hurt at the wheel in France. Your car is insured in Britain, the lorry is insured in France, the police report is written in French, and you have no idea who pays the hospital bill, who pays for the wrecked car, who compensates months off work back in Kent, and whether your UK driving licence or your number plate somehow counts against you. Here is the reassurance French law gives you before anything else. France runs road crashes through a special victim-friendly statute, the Act of 5 July 1985 on compensation for road-traffic victims, universally called the loi Badinter after the justice minister who carried it. Every driver on French soil must be insured, the liable driver’s insurer owes every injured person a reasoned compensation offer within three months and in every case within eight months of the crash, and late payment carries interest at double the legal rate. If the other driver fled or drove without insurance, a national guarantee fund steps in. A criminal investigation runs alongside and costs you nothing to trigger. The only real trap for a person hurt while driving, as opposed to a passenger, is driver fault: your own proven fault can reduce or remove your compensation, so the whole file turns on evidence, medical proof and deadlines. Brexit changed not one line of these remedies, though it means every step must be managed from Britain, which is why this guide is written for you. Part I covers the roadside, the hospital and the insurer timetable in the first weeks. Part II covers the fault argument, the guarantee fund, the criminal track and how to challenge a poor offer from the United Kingdom.

I. Just crashed while driving in France after Brexit: what secures your compensation in the first weeks?

A. Hit at the wheel with a UK car and a UK licence: what should you do at the roadside, the hospital and with the two insurers?

Start with the body and the paper, in that order. Call 112, the single European emergency number, or 15, the French medical emergency service known as the Samu, and then 17 for the police or the gendarmerie, the military-status police force that patrols most motorways and rural roads. Move to safety if you can, put on the yellow vest, the gilet jaune, that French law requires in every car, set out the warning triangle, the triangle de signalisation, and photograph everything before the vehicles are moved: number plates, final positions, skid marks, debris, damage to all sides, road signs, weather, and your visible injuries. Ask every witness for a name, a telephone number and an email address, because British witnesses drive home and disappear, and French witnesses remember less with each passing month. If the other driver admits nothing, say nothing about blame yourself; exchange registration documents and insurance details calmly and fill in the joint accident report, the constat amiable, the standard European form carried in every French glove box. Sign it only if every box is true, keep your carbon copy, the double, and note any disagreement in the observations box, the case observations. When the gendarmes attend, give a short factual account, ask for the report reference, the numéro de procès-verbal, and ask which unit keeps the file, because your lawyer will need that reference to obtain the file later.

At the hospital, build the medical chain from the first hour, because French compensation pays for what the medical certificates prove, not for what you remember months later. Ask for the initial medical certificate, the certificat médical initial, describing every injury, every pain and every day of total incapacity for work, the incapacité totale de travail, often shortened to ITT, which in this context is a medical measure of how long you cannot live normally, not a work contract concept. Mention the stiff neck, the ringing ears, the nightmares, the numb fingers, not only the fracture, because secondary symptoms documented on day one carry far more weight than symptoms first mentioned six months later. Keep every document: emergency admission slip, X-rays, prescriptions, the stop-work certificate, the arrêt de travail, pharmacy receipts, taxi invoices to appointments, and proof of what you paid. Show your Global Health Insurance Card, the GHIC, the post-Brexit successor to the European Health Insurance Card for medically necessary state care during a stay, alongside your travel insurance and your car policy, and keep copies of whatever the hospital photocopies. If your children or your spouse were hurt as passengers, make sure each of them has a separate certificate in their own name, because each victim holds a separate claim even within one family car.

Your British licence and your British plates change the paperwork, not your rights. Since Brexit your UK photocard licence remains valid for driving in France on a visit, and the gov.uk guidance on driving abroad confirms the documents to carry, while a right-hand-drive car remains an ordinary insured vehicle provided it is roadworthy, taxed and insured. What matters is proof of insurance valid for France. British motorists used to rely on the Green Card, the carte verte, the international certificate proving that a vehicle carries the minimum third-party motor insurance required where it travels. After Brexit the United Kingdom rejoined the number-plate recognition arrangement, so a UK plate is normally enough evidence at the roadside, but carry the policy schedule, the insurer emergency number and any Green Card your insurer issued, because after a serious crash nobody wants an argument about paperwork in a lay-by. French law itself is uncompromising about cover: article L211-1 of the Insurance Code provides: “Toute personne physique ou toute personne morale autre que l’Etat, dont la responsabilité civile peut être engagée en raison de dommages subis par des tiers résultant d’atteintes aux personnes ou aux biens dans la réalisation desquels un véhicule est impliqué, doit, pour faire circuler celui-ci, être couverte par une assurance garantissant cette responsabilité, dans les conditions fixées par décret en Conseil d’Etat.” Every person whose civil liability may be engaged for third-party injury or damage in which a vehicle is involved must be covered by insurance before driving. The French lorry that hit you therefore has an insurer, identified on the police report, and your own UK insurer remains your first port of call for the car, for repatriation cover and for legal-expenses cover, the protection juridique, that many British comprehensive policies include.

Notify both insurers in writing within days, and keep proof of posting. French policies classically require notice within five working days, the cinq jours ouvrés, and British policies impose their own prompt-notification clauses, so send a recorded email to your UK insurer the same week with the policy number, the place, date and time, the other vehicle registration, the police reference, photographs and the hospital certificate, and send a separate registered letter to the French insurer once identified, reserving every head of loss. If the other vehicle was foreign, unidentified at first, or the French insurer plays for time, the French national bureau for cross-border motor claims, the Bureau central français, can trace the liable insurer from the registration number, and your French lawyer writes that tracing letter as a matter of routine. Never authorise the repair or scrapping of your car before the expert examination, the expertise, has taken place, and never sign a discharge, the quittance, or a receipt marked final, the pour solde de tout compte, for a small cheque presented as urgent help. Early money should arrive as a clearly labelled interim payment, the provision, which leaves the balance open. For readers who also wrestle with bringing the car itself back into compliance, our companion guide for British drivers registering a UK car in France after Brexit maps the customs and registration track that runs alongside the injury file.

B. How long does the French insurer have to make you a compensation offer, and what should the first payment look like?

The French timetable is one of the strictest in Europe, and it is the lever that moves your file. article L211-9 of the Insurance Code provides: “Une offre d’indemnité doit être faite à la victime qui a subi une atteinte à sa personne dans le délai maximum de huit mois à compter de l’accident.” A compensation offer must be made to the victim who suffered personal injury within a maximum of eight months from the accident. The same article sharpens the duty where the facts are clear: “Quelle que soit la nature du dommage, dans le cas où la responsabilité n’est pas contestée et où le dommage a été entièrement quantifié, l’assureur qui garantit la responsabilité civile du fait d’un véhicule terrestre à moteur est tenu de présenter à la victime une offre d’indemnité motivée dans le délai de trois mois à compter de la demande d’indemnisation qui lui est présentée.” Wherever liability is undisputed and the loss is fully quantified, the insurer must present a reasoned offer within three months of the compensation request. Where liability is disputed or the loss is not yet quantified, the insurer must within the same period give a reasoned reply to the points raised in the request. Where the victim’s condition has not consolidated, the consolidation, the medical moment when the injuries stabilise and the permanent consequences can be measured, the insurer may make a provisional offer, the offre provisionnelle, and must then make the final offer within five months of learning of consolidation. The article closes with a victim-friendly rule worth quoting to every handler: “En tout état de cause, le délai le plus favorable à la victime s’applique.” In every case the time limit most favourable to the victim applies.

Delay is expensive for the insurer, and that is deliberate. article L211-13 of the Insurance Code provides: “Lorsque l’offre n’a pas été faite dans les délais impartis à l’article L. 211-9 , le montant de l’indemnité offerte par l’assureur ou allouée par le juge à la victime produit intérêt de plein droit au double du taux de l’intérêt légal à compter de l’expiration du délai et jusqu’au jour de l’offre ou du jugement devenu définitif.” Where the offer was not made within the article L211-9 periods, the compensation offered by the insurer or awarded by the court automatically bears interest at double the statutory rate from expiry of the period until the offer or the final judgment. The court may reduce the penalty only for circumstances beyond the insurer’s control. The Court of Cassation applies this mechanism strictly. In a much-cited ruling, Cass. 2nd civ., 14 January 2010, appeals nos. 08-18.939 and 09-65.388, the court recalled: “l’assureur qui garantit la responsabilité civile du fait d’un véhicule terrestre à moteur est tenu, dans un délai maximum de huit mois à compter de l’accident, de présenter une offre d’indemnité à la victime qui a subi une atteinte à la personne” and held that where the offer was not made in time, the compensation bears interest at double the legal rate by operation of law. The message for your file is practical: diary the eight-month date from the crash, keep the proof of your written claim, and if the letter that arrives is a vague holding reply rather than a reasoned and quantified offer, treat it as a missed deadline and say so in writing.

Two recent Court of Cassation cases show how the timetable bites on real files, including a motorcyclist case close to many British readers who tour France on two wheels. In Cass. 2nd civ., 23 January 2025, appeal no. 22-23.015, a motorcyclist injured on 25 November 2011 in a collision with a car insured by Axa France IARD claimed compensation before the civil court alongside the local health fund, the caisse primaire d’assurance maladie, and his mutual insurer, and years later disputed the starting point and base of the double-rate interest on the insurer’s belated offer of 28 December 2021. The court had ordered interest at double the legal rate from 16 June 2013 to 28 December 2021 on the offered sum, and the victim argued that where no offer at all, not even a provisional one, had been made within eight months of the accident, interest should run on the full sums awarded by the court of appeal rather than on the late offer alone. The ruling is technical, but the lesson is plain English: provisions paid along the way, the provisions versées, and deductions for third-party payers, the créance des tiers payeurs, do not cure a missed eight-month deadline, and the argument is always about which capital sum carries the doubled interest and from which date. In Cass. 2nd civ., 18 September 2025, appeal no. 23-23.386, a victim hurt on 18 February 2005 had received a provisional offer of 20,000 euros on 6 October 2005 and a further 5,000 euros on 12 March 2008 while her condition remained unconsolidated, then a final offer of 153,176.64 euros on 18 September 2009 after consolidation was fixed at 26 June 2008, which she refused before seeking court-ordered medical examination and further provisions. The file therefore illustrates the normal rhythm the statute intends: early interim money while the doctors wait, a reasoned final figure once consolidation is certified, and then either acceptance or a court valuation. Accept a provision when it is labelled as such, because it pays the mortgage while the file matures, but never sign language accepting it as the balance, the solde définitif, unless your lawyer confirms the valuation is complete and every head of loss is priced.

Judge every offer against a complete inventory of French heads of loss, the postes de préjudice, valued under the Dintilhac nomenclature, the nomenclature Dintilhac, the national schedule French experts, insurers and courts use to itemise bodily injury. For temporary losses expect temporary functional impairment, the déficit fonctionnel temporaire, pain and suffering, the souffrances endurées, graded on the classic seven-point scale, temporary loss of earnings, the pertes de gains professionnels temporaires, with payslips, employer attestations and self-employed accounts, third-party assistance, the assistance par tierce personne, costed by hours even where the family helped without charge, and extra living and travel costs. For permanent consequences expect permanent functional impairment, the déficit fonctionnel permanent, expressed as a percentage after consolidation, future care and equipment, professional losses including lost promotion chances, loss of amenity, the préjudice d’agrément, for sports and hobbies you can no longer practise, aesthetic harm, the préjudice esthétique, sexual harm, and the changed conditions of daily life. Add the wrecked car, the ruined helmets, leathers, child seats, spectacles and luggage as property loss, the préjudice matériel, with like-for-like invoices, and add every receipt for private physiotherapy back in Britain where French state tariffs left a shortfall. A reasoned offer prices each head separately, cites the medical report behind each figure, deducts itemised third-party payments and provisions transparently, and explains consolidation. A one-page global sum with no breakdown, no medical reference and no deduction schedule is not a reasoned offer in the spirit of the statute, and your reply should ask for the missing breakdown within a short deadline while reserving court action and double interest.

II. Insurer blames you, offers too little, or the other driver vanished: how do you challenge from the UK?

A. Told the crash was your fault as the driver, or offered a fraction of your losses: how do you answer driver fault and force a fair valuation?

Here lies the great divide of French road law, and British drivers must understand it precisely because it differs from English instincts. Passengers, pedestrians and cyclists are protected non-drivers: the driver’s insurer owes them compensation almost automatically, and only an unforgivable fault that alone caused the crash can reduce it. Drivers hurt at the wheel face a sterner rule. Article 4 of the Act of 5 July 1985 on compensation for road-traffic victims (the loi Badinter) provides that fault by the driver of a motor vehicle limits or excludes compensation for that driver’s own injuries. In practice the French court asks three questions: did the driver commit a proven and certain fault, the faute prouvée et certaine, such as excessive speed, drink-driving, crossing a solid white line, using a telephone, running a priority sign or falling asleep; did that fault contribute to the injuries; and if so, by how much should compensation be reduced, from a percentage cut to total exclusion. Where no such fault is proved, the injured driver is compensated in full, and the insurer that merely alleges carelessness without proof loses the argument. The police file therefore decides more than the fine: the plan of the scene, the plan des lieux, the speed estimates, the alcohol readings, the tachograph of the lorry, the chronotachygraphe, and the witness statements are the raw material of the fault debate, which is why obtaining the criminal file early through a French lawyer matters even where you intend to settle.

Answer a fault allegation with evidence, not adjectives. If the insurer writes that you were speeding, demand the measurement behind the claim: calibrated radar reference, reconstruction report, the rapport de reconstitution, or skid-mark calculation, and compare it with your dashcam footage, telematics data and the lorry tachograph. If the insurer invokes drink-driving, check the blood-test chain of custody, the chaîne de traçabilité du prélèvement sanguin, the timing of the sample, and whether the reading actually exceeds the French limits, which are stricter than the English ones at 0.5 grams per litre of blood for experienced drivers and 0.2 for probationary licences, the permis probatoire. If the insurer claims you drifted, commission a sworn automotive expert, the expert automobile assermenté, to read the crush damage, because paint transfer and deformation tell their own story about angles and speeds. Send the reasoned rebuttal by registered letter, annexing each exhibit, and put the insurer on notice that an unproved fault deduction will be contested before the court with a claim for double interest. Where fault is genuinely shared, for example where you were modestly over the limit while the lorry crossed the line, negotiate the percentage openly against comparable court decisions rather than accepting the first figure of seventy percent reduction scribbled by a handler, and remember that your passengers in the same car keep their own full claim regardless of your fault as their driver, because their protection as non-drivers is independent.

Challenge the medical valuation just as methodically. French insurers routinely send victims to a single doctor chosen and paid by the insurer, the médecin-conseil de la compagnie, whose report then anchors a low offer. You are entitled to attend every examination with a doctor of your own choice, the médecin-conseil de victime, an independent doctor who advises injured people rather than insurers, and to receive the full report, not a summary. If the report understates pain, ignores cognitive complaints, fixes consolidation prematurely while you still need surgery, or prices home help at two hours a week where you need two hours a day, instruct your own doctor to write a detailed counter-report, the contre-expertise médicale, and ask the court for a judicial medical examination, the expertise judiciaire, where a neutral expert appointed by the judge examines you with both doctors present and answers a formal list of questions, the mission d’expertise. Courts appoint such experts readily in road cases, and the resulting report normally resets the negotiation. Value each head under the Dintilhac schedule with British proof translated into French logic: the Kent payslips and the P60 for earnings, the employer letter confirming missed overtime and the lost bonus, the self-employed profit-and-loss accounts, the private physiotherapy invoices with the French state reimbursement slips showing the shortfall, the family diary of night care, and the cycling-club secretary letter confirming the racing season you missed. Interest at double the legal rate continues to run behind the negotiation where the deadline was missed, which is why a calm, documented, deadline-driven correspondence moves figures more than any telephone complaint.

Where the other driver fled the scene or drove without insurance, do not accept that nobody pays. article L421-1 of the Insurance Code provides that the guarantee fund for compulsory motor insurance, the fonds de garantie des assurances obligatoires de dommages, commonly shortened to FGAO: “Le fonds de garantie des assurances obligatoires de dommages indemnise, dans les conditions prévues aux 1 et 2 du présent I, les victimes ou les ayants droit des victimes des dommages nés d’un accident survenu en France” The fund then pays personal injury where: “Lorsque le responsable des dommages est inconnu” and where: “Lorsque le responsable des dommages n’est pas assuré, sauf par l’effet d’une dérogation légale à l’obligation d’assurance.” Property damage is also covered under conditions fixed by decree, normally requiring personal injury alongside where the liable driver is unknown. File the criminal complaint immediately, because the fund will ask for the police reference and will pursue the unknown or uninsured driver afterwards through its own recovery action, the recours subrogatoire, while you are paid without waiting for that hunt to succeed. If you yourself drove a UK car whose insurance turns out to be invalid for France, take specialist advice at once, because the fund may still compensate the victims you injured and then turn to you for repayment, and driving without valid cover also exposes you to criminal penalties, impoundment of the vehicle, the mise en fourrière, and real difficulty obtaining future cover.

B. How do you run the police case and the court claim from Britain, and which deadlines must never be missed?

Run the criminal and civil tracks together, because each feeds the other. File the criminal complaint, the plainte, at the gendarmerie or police station of the crash area or online with a follow-up signature, describing the facts, the injuries and the witnesses, and join the proceedings as a civil party, the partie civile, the victim who claims damages inside the criminal case. article 85 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: “Toute personne qui se prétend lésée par un crime ou un délit peut en portant plainte se constituer partie civile devant le juge d’instruction compétent” Any person claiming to have been harmed by a serious or lesser offence may, by filing a complaint, join as a civil party before the competent investigating judge. For road injuries the prosecutor, the procureur de la République, normally orders a police inquiry, obtains the medical findings, questions the drivers and decides whether to prosecute for involuntary injury, the blessures involontaires, speeding, drink-driving or failure to assist a person in danger, the non-assistance à personne en danger, or to close the file without prosecution, the classement sans suite. Even a closure helps your civil file, because the file kept at the registry contains the measurements and statements, and your lawyer obtains a copy. Where prosecution goes ahead, the criminal court can convict and award you damages in the same judgment, and the insurer of the convicted driver, called into the case where useful, cannot then relitigate fault from scratch. Where the case is closed, the civil action survives independently: article 1240 of the Civil Code provides: “Tout fait quelconque de l’homme, qui cause à autrui un dommage, oblige celui par la faute duquel il est arrivé à le réparer.” Any act whatever of man which causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it occurred to repair it. The ordinary civil and criminal court, the tribunal judiciaire, then values your loss without deference to the insurer scale and can order its own medical examination.

While the full valuation proceeds, interim money is available from the emergency judge, the juge des référés, the judge who grants urgent provisional relief within weeks. article 834 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: “Dans tous les cas d’urgence, le président du tribunal judiciaire ou le juge des contentieux de la protection dans les limites de sa compétence, peuvent ordonner en référé toutes les mesures qui ne se heurtent à aucune contestation sérieuse ou que justifie l’existence d’un différend.” And article 835 of the Code of Civil Procedure adds: “Dans les cas où l’existence de l’obligation n’est pas sérieusement contestable, ils peuvent accorder une provision au créancier, ou ordonner l’exécution de l’obligation même s’il s’agit d’une obligation de faire.” Where the debt is not seriously disputable, the judge may grant the creditor an interim payment. Against an identified insured driver, an injured British driver with a police report, hospital certificates and an insurer on risk will normally obtain such a provision covering hospital advances, travel for treatment and destroyed equipment within weeks, while the argument about percentages and permanent impairment continues behind. Ask your lawyer to issue the emergency summons, the assignation en référé, as soon as the insurer stalls, because handlers recalibrate once a judge sets a hearing date.

Limitation gives you breathing room but never an excuse for delay. article 2226 of the Civil Code provides: “L’action en responsabilité née à raison d’un événement ayant entraîné un dommage corporel, engagée par la victime directe ou indirecte des préjudices qui en résultent, se prescrit par dix ans à compter de la date de la consolidation du dommage initial ou aggravé.” The liability action for bodily injury is time-barred ten years after consolidation of the initial or aggravated injury. Medical aggravation found later, the aggravation, restarts its own assessment, and any settlement should therefore reserve aggravation expressly rather than waiving unknown futures in small print. Keep every deadline printed on served documents, especially for appeals, whose periods run in days from service, and never let an insurer silence mature into a missed court date: silence answers in court, not by telephone. Run the whole file from Britain through a single French lawyer holding a written authority, the pouvoir, to receive documents, instruct experts and negotiate. Send one organised bundle: the police reference and any report copy, every medical certificate in chronological order, photographs, witness details, employment and booking proofs, GHIC and travel-insurance correspondence, the UK policy and any Green Card, and every insurer letter with its envelope showing the date. Ask for translations of key medical conclusions where the expert needs them, attend examinations by video or in person as directed, and diary the eight-month offer date, the consolidation examination and the emergency hearing together. If the crash ends your French driving seasons altogether and you later rethink the house in the Dordogne that hosted them, keep the injury file and the property decision strictly separate, and value each on its own evidence.

Conclusion

A crash at the wheel in France looks like the lorry driver’s story, but French law makes it the victim’s procedure, even where the victim held the steering wheel. As a British driver hurt in France, you stand inside the Badinter system: the liable driver’s insurer owes you a reasoned offer within three months of a clear claim and in every case within eight months of the accident, with interest at double the legal rate where it misses the date, and only your own proven fault can reduce what you receive, a test the insurer must prove rather than assert. If the driver fled or drove uninsured, the guarantee fund takes the insurer’s place while it hunts the driver afterwards, and the criminal complaint you filed in the first days produces the measurements, the statements and the medical findings that anchor everything. Challenge weak files with paper and deadlines rather than resignation: a reasoned rebuttal of fault, an independent medical examination, a court-appointed expert and an interim payment from the emergency judge move figures more than any telephone negotiation. Keep the bundle complete from the lay-by to the courtroom, run it through one French lawyer from the United Kingdom, and let the procedure do what the 1985 statute designed it to do: put the cost of French roads back on those who insure them, with the penalty for delay paid to you.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Telephone consultation with a lawyer of the firm within 48 hours. Telephone consultation: EUR 80 including VAT. To arrange it, call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page. We review your police reference, your medical certificates and the insurer letters, then set out the next step for your claim in France.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.