You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, and you have just been appointed president of your own French SAS, the société par actions simplifiée, or manager of your French SARL, the société à responsabilité limitée. The company is registered, the Kbis extract, the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe, the court clerk’s office, is in your inbox, and the first question from your accountant stops you cold: how do you actually take money out of this company, and what will the French social system charge you for it. Take a salary and you trigger French social contributions collected by URSSAF, the body that collects social charges, plus income tax. Take only dividends and you may pay no social charges at all, or you may walk into a reassessment, depending on a distinction most foreign founders have never heard of. Choose the wrong company form for the way you want to be paid and you pay minimum charges every year even when the company earns nothing. This guide explains, for the foreign director who runs a French company from abroad, which social regime covers you, what each euro of salary or dividends really costs, and how to document your pay so that neither URSSAF nor the tax administration can unwind it later. Every French acronym is explained along the way. If you are still choosing the vehicle itself, start with our complete guide to setting up a company in France as a foreign founder, then come back here to get paid correctly.
The trap is concrete and expensive. A foreign president of a SAS who votes himself a large bonus without a proper corporate decision can see the payment challenged. A majority manager of a SARL who takes no salary because the company is young still receives a social charges bill, because his regime charges minimum contributions every year. A director who works for the French company while living in another country without clarifying where he is socially insured can be claimed by two systems at once, or covered by none. And a founder who pays himself only in dividends to escape charges discovers, sometimes years later, that part of those dividends belonged in the contribution base after all. The two parts below follow the order in which you should think: first, your title determines your regime before you touch a euro; second, once the regime is known, you choose between salary and dividends and you paper the decision so it survives a control.
I. Your title as a foreign director decides your French social charges before you take a euro
A. President of a SAS living abroad: affiliated to the general scheme, charged only on salary actually paid
The president of a SAS is not self-employed in French social law. He is assimilé salarié, treated like an employee for social security purposes: he belongs to the régime général, the general social security scheme that covers employees, and his contributions are calculated on his pay. The statute says it directly. Article L. 311-2 of the Social Security Code provides: Sont affiliées obligatoirement aux assurances sociales du régime général, quel que soit leur âge et même si elles sont titulaires d’une pension, toutes les personnes quelle que soit leur nationalité, de l’un ou de l’autre sexe, salariées ou travaillant à quelque titre ou en quelque lieu que ce soit, pour un ou plusieurs employeurs et quels que soient le montant et la nature de leur rémunération, la forme, la nature ou la validité de leur contrat ou la nature de leur statut. Nationality does not matter, the place of work does not matter: a British, American or Emirati president of a French SAS falls inside the French system for the work done for that company. Article L. 311-3 then names the company directors concerned, and its item 23 reads: 23° Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et des sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées. The president and the executive officers of a SAS are therefore compulsorily affiliated to the general scheme, and the Cour de cassation, the French supreme court, confirmed the point again on 5 June 2025 in appeal number 23-13.887, holding: Selon l’article L. 311-3, 23°, du code de la sécurité sociale, dans sa rédaction applicable au litige, sont obligatoirement affiliés aux assurances sociales du régime général les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et de sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées.
That 2025 ruling deserves a closer look because it is exactly the situation a foreign group creates without thinking. A company had a supervisory board, a conseil de surveillance, whose president was listed in the BODACC, the official bulletin of civil and commercial announcements, as a person with standing power to bind the company, and on the M2 modification form, the administrative form filed with the company register, as a company director, with a casting vote on large investments and an annual remuneration fixed by the articles. URSSAF treated him as a de facto executive and reassessed the company for contributions on his pay. The Court rejected the appeal and validated the reassessment. The lesson for a foreign founder is symmetrical: titles and filings decide your regime. If your name appears on the Kbis extract, in the BODACC and on the company account as the person who runs the SAS, you are inside the general scheme whether you live in Paris or in Dubai, and URSSAF will read those same publications to prove it. Conversely, the Court recalled the limit that protects purely supervisory roles: ayant pour seule mission de contrôler les organes de direction de la société sans en assumer la gestion, les membres du conseil de surveillance ne sont en principe pas affiliés aux assurances sociales du régime général, sauf à démontrer qu’ils exercent en réalité une fonction de direction. Members of a supervisory board who only supervise are in principle outside the scheme, unless they actually manage. A foreign investor who sits on the board without managing should therefore keep that role genuinely supervisory, documented in minutes, and never sign as the person who routinely binds the company.
Once affiliated, what do you actually pay. Contributions in the general scheme are levied on pay actually received. Article L. 242-1 of the Social Security Code provides: Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues au titre de l’affiliation au régime général des personnes mentionnées aux articles L. 311-2 et L. 311-3 sont assises sur les revenus d’activité tels qu’ils sont pris en compte pour la détermination de l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-1-1. In practice this means the company withholds the employee share from your salary, adds the employer share on top, and pays both to URSSAF through the DSN, the déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly electronic payroll return every French employer files. The combined weight is heavy, roughly three-quarters of the net amount added on top for a typical executive salary once all contributions and levies are counted, so a salary that feels modest in London or New York costs the French company far more than its face amount. Three qualifications soften the picture. First, an unpaid president costs nothing: no salary, no contribution base, no charges, which is why many foreign founders leave the presidency unpaid in the early years and live on dividends or on income from abroad. Second, the assimilated director does not contribute to unemployment insurance and has no right to unemployment benefits, as URSSAF’s own guidance confirms: Le dirigeant d’une SASU a le statut d’assimilé salarié. In that status you join the general scheme but remain outside unemployment insurance, so do not count on French jobseeker benefits if the venture fails. Third, contributions above the social security ceiling, the plafond de la Sécurité sociale, drop for the capped portions: for 2026 the monthly ceiling is 4,005 euros, since la valeur mensuelle du plafond s’élève à 4 005 € (contre 3 925 € en 2025), with 48 060 € en valeur annuelle for the year, so very high salaries face a lower marginal charge rate, while the CSG and CRDS levies continue without any ceiling.
Company law reinforces the same logic from the other side. The SAS is represented by its president, appointed as the articles provide, and article L. 227-6 of the Commercial Code states: La société est représentée à l’égard des tiers par un président désigné dans les conditions prévues par les statuts, adding: Le président est investi des pouvoirs les plus étendus pour agir en toute circonstance au nom de la société dans la limite de l’objet social. Because the president holds the widest powers, the system treats him as inside the company, affiliated and chargeable on his pay, rather than as an outside contractor. A foreign founder who wants the SAS form with its flexible articles and single-shareholder SASU variant, but no French charges in year one, has a clean route: appoint yourself president, fix your remuneration at zero in a written decision, pay yourself nothing, and file nothing for yourself. The day you vote a salary, payslips, the DSN and full contributions start, including for the director who signs them from abroad.
B. Majority manager of a SARL living abroad: self-employed, with minimum charges even in a loss-making year
The SARL, the limited liability company with its more rigid statutory frame, reverses the picture. Article L. 223-18 of the Commercial Code provides: La société à responsabilité limitée est gérée par une ou plusieurs personnes physiques, and the manager holds similarly wide powers toward third parties: Dans les rapports avec les tiers, le gérant est investi des pouvoirs les plus étendus pour agir en toute circonstance au nom de la société, sous réserve des pouvoirs que la loi attribue expressément aux associés. But the social regime of that manager depends on his shareholding. A manager who, alone or together with his spouse, civil partner and minor children, holds more than half of the capital is a gérant majoritaire, a majority manager, and belongs to the independent workers’ scheme, the régime des travailleurs indépendants, historically called TNS for travailleur non salarié. A minority or equal manager, and a manager who holds no shares at all, is assimilated to an employee and follows the SAS-president logic described above, since article L. 311-3 expressly lists minority managers of SARLs among the affiliated persons. Choosing between a SAS and a SARL is therefore also choosing between two social worlds, and a foreign founder who wants to minimise fixed costs should understand the TNS world before electing the SARL for its apparent simplicity.
The TNS manager pays contributions on his professional income under article L. 131-6 of the Social Security Code, which provides: Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues par les travailleurs indépendants non agricoles ne relevant pas du dispositif prévu à l’article L. 613-7 sont assises sur l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-3. Two features surprise foreign founders. First, the contributions are called provisionally on the current year’s estimated income and adjusted later, with flat minimum amounts due for health, retirement and invalidity even in a year with no profit, so a majority manager pays several thousand euros a year to URSSAF while his unpaid SAS counterpart pays zero. Second, the manager’s dividends are not fully sheltered: the fraction of dividends exceeding a statutory share of the capital is pulled back into the contribution base, which means stuffing the company with capital and draining it in dividends does not escape charges the way it largely does in a SAS. The protection side is thinner too: daily sickness benefits start later, pensions accrue on lower bases, and there is no unemployment cover either. None of this makes the SARL a bad vehicle; family businesses and small operations use it every day. It makes the SARL the wrong vehicle for the foreign founder whose plan is to leave the company dormant or unpaid for a year while the business develops abroad. If your plan is zero pay in year one, the SAS with an unpaid president is structurally cheaper, and the articles should say so in black and white.
II. How to take money out of your French company without a reassessment from URSSAF or the tax office
A. Salary or dividends: what each euro really costs and how each is taxed
With the regime settled, the choice is arithmetic plus paperwork. A salary is deductible for the company, taxed as employment income for you, and loaded with contributions. Article 62 of the General Tax Code, the Code général des impôts, sets the income-tax treatment of managers’ pay and provides: Les traitements, remboursements forfaitaires de frais et toutes autres rémunérations sont soumis à l’impôt sur le revenu au nom de leurs bénéficiaires s’ils sont admis en déduction des bénéfices soumis à l’impôt sur les sociétés par application de l’article 211. The salary lowers the company’s corporation tax and lands in your personal income tax under the wages category, with the 10 percent standard deduction or actual expenses. For a profitable company paying 25 percent corporation tax, each euro of employer-cost salary saves 25 cents of company tax while creating personal tax and contributions, which is why founders of profitable companies often prefer salary up to a reasonable level: it builds pension quarters, health rights and payslips that banks understand, at a known net cost. For a company with no profit, salary creates charges without any tax saving, which is why founders of young companies usually vote zero remuneration and wait.
Dividends follow the opposite path: not deductible for the company, since they are distributed from after-tax profit, but not subject to URSSAF contributions for the SAS president and lightly loaded for the shareholder. The default tax treatment is the flat levy of 30 percent, the prélèvement forfaitaire unique, combining 12.8 percent income tax collected at source with 17.2 percent social levies. Article 200 A of the General Tax Code submits capital income to that flat taxation, and its first paragraph covers: sont soumis à l’imposition forfaitaire : 1° Les revenus de capitaux mobiliers mentionnés au VII de la 1ère sous-section de la section II du présent chapitre, which includes dividends distributed by your French company. You can instead elect taxation under the progressive scale with the 40 percent allowance, since the statute grants on distributed income: d’un abattement égal à 40 % de leur montant brut perçu, an option that wins when your marginal rate is low. Either way the 17.2 percent social levies apply, because article L. 136-6 of the Social Security Code provides: Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B du code général des impôts sont assujetties à une contribution sur les revenus du patrimoine assise sur le montant net retenu pour l’établissement de l’impôt sur le revenu, expressly catching: Des revenus de capitaux mobiliers. Note the condition: fiscally domiciled in France. A founder who lives abroad and is not a French tax resident generally escapes the 17.2 percent levies on French dividends, though the distributing company still withholds tax at the treaty or statutory rate, commonly 25 percent for non-residents subject to reduction by the applicable double-tax treaty, with the refund or reduction claimed through the non-resident tax office. Living abroad therefore changes the dividend maths in your favour, while it changes nothing about the salary maths: French-source salary for French duties remains inside French contributions.
The paperwork matters as much as the maths, and the Cour de cassation explained why on 13 January 2021 in appeal number 18-21.860. Majority shareholders had voted their outgoing manager exceptional bonuses worth thirteen times the company’s annual result just before selling their shares, and the new owner asked the courts to cancel the awards as contrary to the company’s interest. The commercial chamber quashed the cancellation, holding: Il résulte du second qu’une délibération de l’assemblée générale des associés d’une société octroyant une rémunération exceptionnelle à son dirigeant ne peut être annulée qu’en cas de violation des dispositions impératives du livre II dudit code ou de violation des lois qui régissent les contrats, et non au seul motif de sa contrariété à l’intérêt social, sauf fraude ou abus de droit commis par un ou plusieurs associés pour favoriser ses ou leurs intérêts au détriment de ceux d’un ou plusieurs autres associés. A shareholders’ decision fixing the director’s pay can only be cancelled for a breach of mandatory company law or contract law, not merely because the amount looks excessive, except in cases of fraud or abuse. The practical reading for a foreign founder is protective in both directions: fix your remuneration, or its absence, in a dated written decision of the competent body, the shareholders or the board as your articles require, before the money moves, and a later minority shareholder, buyer or administrator will struggle to unwind it; but vote yourself an outsized bonus on the eve of a sale, stripping the company, and fraud or abuse remains available to strike it down. Never pay yourself by simple bank transfer with no supporting resolution, never backdate the resolution, and keep the signed minutes with the company’s records where your accountant can produce them during a control.
B. URSSAF control from abroad: registration, payslips, cross-border proof and how to challenge a bill
A control usually starts with paper, not with a visit. Because you live abroad, everything arrives at the company’s registered office, the siège social, or in your accountant’s inbox: a request for payroll records, then a letter of observations, the lettre d’observations, setting out the reassessment item by item, then a formal demand to pay, the mise en demeure, then an enforceable order, the contrainte, served like a court order. The 2018 ruling on the unpaid SAS president shows the full chain in action: the fund served a contrainte for allegedly unpaid contributions, the director filed an opposition, and the judge cancelled the order because the debt had no legal basis. The same chain protects you: each step has a deadline, usually one month for the observations reply and to challenge the mise en demeure, and missing a deadline forfeits the argument even when the substance is on your side. Give your accountant or lawyer a standing instruction to forward every URSSAF letter the day it arrives, and calendar the reply dates from the date of receipt, not from the date you happen to read the email.
Three files decide most controls before they start. First, the affiliation file: the company must be registered as an employer with URSSAF from the first payslip, and the DPAE, the pre-hiring declaration, must be filed before any employee, including a paid president, starts work. A president paid for months with no employer registration and no DSN returns looks like concealed work, travail dissimulé, and turns a routine adjustment into penalties. Second, the payroll file: every payslip must show the gross, each contribution line, the net social, the net taxable and the net paid, matching the DSN totals to the euro. URSSAF cross-checks the DSN against the company’s tax filings, so the salary deducted in the corporate return must equal the salary declared in the DSN; a gap between the two is the single most common trigger for a letter. Third, the cross-border file: a director who lives outside France and works for the French company should carry proof of where he is socially insured. Inside the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland, the coordination rules keep one legislation applicable at a time and the A1 certificate issued by the home institution proves it during secondments and multi-state work. Outside that area, bilateral social security conventions with countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada or Morocco allocate coverage treaty by treaty, and where no treaty covers the situation, the French duties are simply insured in France. Keep the certificate or the treaty analysis with the payroll file, because the URSSAF inspector who asks why a resident director pays nothing will accept that document and little else.
If the bill arrives despite all that, contest it in order. Reply to the letter of observations with documents, not adjectives, asking for each item the legal basis, the calculation and the period. If the mise en demeure follows, challenge it before the social security court within the stated time, and if a contrainte is served, file an opposition, which sends the dispute to a judge who checks both the principle and the amount of the debt. Judges cancel constraints regularly when the affiliation was wrong, the person unpaid, or the calculation unfounded, exactly as in the 2018 case. Late registration can still be regularised: file the employer registration, issue the back payslips, submit the late DSN returns and pay the contributions with the surcharges, which stops the penalties from growing and usually restores a cooperative footing. What you must never do is ignore the letters because you live abroad, pay yourself through a foreign company invoice for work that is really your French directorship, or invent a consultancy agreement to simulate independence while signing everything as president. The 2025 ruling shows that URSSAF and the courts look past labels to real powers, BODACC publications and signature habits, and reclassification then adds the contributions, the late surcharges and, in serious cases, the concealed-work penalties on top.
Conclusion
A foreign founder’s pay in France is a three-step decision, and the order cannot be changed. First, read your title: president of a SAS, you belong to the general scheme and pay charges only on salary actually voted and paid, so zero salary means zero charges; majority manager of a SARL, you belong to the independent scheme with minimum charges every year, so the SARL is the wrong shell for an unpaid start. Second, choose the channel: salary is deductible, builds rights and costs full contributions from the first euro, while dividends come from after-tax profit, escape URSSAF contributions in the SAS, and face the 30 percent flat levy or the progressive scale with its 40 percent allowance, with the cross-border position often improving the dividend side for non-residents. Third, write it down before the money moves: a dated decision fixing remuneration or its absence, payslips matching the DSN, and, for the director living abroad, the certificate or treaty proof showing where he is insured. With those three steps, an URSSAF letter becomes a paperwork exercise instead of a threat, and the French company you run from London, New York or Dubai pays exactly what it owes, no more and no less.
Need a quick opinion on your case
Telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm: first phone consultation 80 EUR incl. tax, first case review 80 EUR incl. tax. We review your director status, your salary and dividend mix, and any URSSAF letter you received. Call Maître Reda Kohen at +33 6 46 60 58 22. Contact the firm.