Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Family SCI in France After Brexit: Buying the House Through a Société Civile Immobilière, Paying the Right Tax, and Challenging the Bill

You have found the stone farmhouse near Sarlat, or the two-bedroom flat in Nice that will become your base in France, and the estate agent, the agent immobilier, tells you that every British family buys through an SCI. An SCI, which stands for société civile immobilière, is a French civil property company: a small company whose only job is to own and manage one or more French buildings. It sounds reassuring, flexible and clever for inheritance. It can be all three, but it can also be an expensive mistake, because the SCI changes nothing about Brexit residence rules, it can cost you the main-home capital gains exemption, it drags annual filing duties behind it, and since Brexit British shareholders face the same declarations and anti-avoidance taxes as any other non-EU owners.

This guide answers the two questions British buyers actually ask, in the order a lawyer would examine them. First, should your family hold the French house through an SCI at all, how does the vehicle work day to day, and who pays tax on the rents and on the sale. Second, what Brexit really changes for a British-owned SCI, how you escape the dreaded 3% yearly tax, how the wealth tax and succession duties hit SCI shares, and how you challenge a French assessment or refusal step by step, with the exact statutes and two rulings of the Cour de cassation, the highest French court, that show how judges decide.

I. Should my British family buy its French house through an SCI rather than in our own names?

A. How does an SCI own, manage and pass on the family house in France?

Start with what the SCI is in French law. The Civil Code provides that Les dispositions du présent chapitre sont applicables à toutes les sociétés civiles, à moins qu’il n’y soit dérogé par le statut légal particulier auquel certaines d’entre elles sont assujetties. That is Article 1845 of the Civil Code, and it tells you the essential point: an SCI is a fully recognised civil company, not a trust, not an informal arrangement, and not a tax shelter. It needs at least two shareholders, called associés, who can be husband and wife, parents and children, or friends. There is no minimum capital, so a family SCI is commonly formed with a few hundred euros of cash contributions plus the purchase price financed by shareholder loans recorded in a current account, the compte courant d’associé. The company is registered with the company register, the registre du commerce et des sociétés, and it acts through its manager, the gérant, who signs the purchase deed, the insurance, the letting agreements and the tax returns within the powers the articles, the statuts, give him.

Day-to-day management is where the SCI earns its reputation for flexibility. The gérant handles routine administration alone, while important decisions, selling the house, borrowing, approving repairs above an agreed threshold, go to a shareholders’ meeting under the majority rules you wrote into the statuts. A well-drafted SCI keeps one British family from the classic deadlock of direct co-ownership, the indivision, where every co-owner can block a sale and any co-owner can force one. In an SCI, the majority fixed in the articles decides, the manager executes, and a minority shareholder cannot paralyse the family home. That single difference explains why English couples who own a French holiday house together, and later bring adult children into the ownership, so often prefer shares to bricks.

Transfers are the second reason families choose the SCI, and here precision matters. Shares in an SCI move under company rules, not land rules: a gift of shares to your children is made by a share transfer recorded in the company’s books, and it can be split, or démembré, between a life interest and a bare ownership. The life tenant, the usufruitier, keeps the use of the house or the rents; the bare owner, the nu-propriétaire, typically the child, holds the capital interest that becomes full ownership when the life interest ends. Done properly in front of a French notary, the notaire, this lets parents hand the capital value to children progressively while keeping control and occupation, and successive gifts of bare ownership can use the renewable tax allowances between parents and children. But none of this removes the French forced heirship reserve, the réserve héréditaire, from the picture for French-resident families, and none of it avoids French succession duty on French property, as Section II explains.

The lock on the door is the approval clause, the clause d’agrément, and British families should insist on a strong one. The Civil Code states that Les parts sociales ne peuvent être cédées qu’avec l’agrément de tous les associés. That is Article 1861 of the Civil Code, and although the articles may relax unanimity to a stated majority or give the power to the gérant, the default keeps strangers out: no shareholder can sell to an outsider without the family’s consent. The Cour de cassation polices these clauses strictly. In a dispute over shares in a family property company, where an amendment to the articles had tried to reshape approval and pre-emption rights after a sale was already agreed, the court held CASSE ET ANNULE, en toutes ses dispositions, l’arrêt rendu le 22 septembre 2009, entre les parties, par la cour d’appel de Bordeaux, sending the case back because the lower court had given a family member a pre-emption right the statutes and the law did not grant him. That is Cour de cassation, Commercial Chamber, 7 December 2010, No. 09-17.351. The lesson for your SCI is practical: write the approval and pre-emption mechanics once, clearly, at formation, and never amend them mid-sale to favour one side, because a French judge will annul the manoeuvre.

Two neighbouring questions belong to companion guides rather than this one. If you are married in England and now live in France, which matrimonial regime actually owns the house and the SCI shares, and what happens on divorce or death, is answered in our guide to English marriages, French houses and matrimonial regimes after Brexit. If a relative already placed the French property in an English trust rather than an SCI, the declaration duties and fines are different and heavier, as explained in our guide to British trusts holding French assets after Brexit. An SCI and a trust are not interchangeable: the SCI is a French company the French administration understands, while the trust remains a foreign arrangement France taxes with suspicion.

B. Does the SCI pay French tax itself, or do we pay tax personally on the rents and the sale?

The default answer surprises many British buyers: the ordinary family SCI pays no tax itself, and each shareholder is taxed personally on his slice. The General Tax Code provides that les associés des sociétés en nom collectif et les commandités des sociétés en commandite simple sont, lorsque ces sociétés n’ont pas opté pour le régime fiscal des sociétés de capitaux, personnellement soumis à l’impôt sur le revenu pour la part de bénéfices sociaux correspondant à leurs droits dans la société. That is Article 8 of the General Tax Code, extended to civil companies, and a companion provision deems qualifying property companies transparent, stating that they sont réputées, quelle que soit leur forme juridique, ne pas avoir de personnalité distincte de celle de leurs membres pour l’application des impôts directs under Article 1655 ter of the General Tax Code. In plain terms, if your SCI lets the Nice flat for 12,000 euros a year and you hold half the shares, France taxes you personally on 6,000 euros of rental income, under the same furnished or unfurnished rules as a direct owner, and your spouse on the other half. The SCI files an annual information return, the déclaration 2072, and each shareholder reports his share on his French income return, the déclaration 2044 et 2042.

Where you live then decides the second layer of tax. If you remain resident in Britain with a French letting SCI, France taxes the rents first because the building stands on French soil, and Britain gives relief against UK tax on the same income under the France-UK Double Tax Convention of 19 June 2008, whose article on immovable property income keeps taxing rights for rents where the property sits. The official treaty text and HMRC guidance are published on gov.uk France tax treaties. Keep every French tax notice, the avis d’imposition, because HMRC will ask for proof of the French tax paid before granting the credit, and mismatched year-ends between the French calendar year and the UK tax year cause most of the double-tax complaints our office sees. If you have moved to France and become French-resident, you declare the same rental share in France as worldwide income and you declare it in Britain too, with the credit operating in the other direction, exactly as our guide to dual residence and the treaty tie-breaker explains.

The SCI can elect to pay corporation tax, the impôt sur les sociétés, instead, but that election is a one-way door with lasting effects and it suits only a minority of British families. The statute lists which companies fall under corporation tax as a matter of course, providing that sont passibles de l’impôt sur les sociétés, quel que soit leur objet, les sociétés anonymes, les sociétés en commandite par actions, les sociétés à responsabilité limitée and others under Article 206 of the General Tax Code, while a civil company enters that regime only by formal option. Once the option is exercised, rents are taxed inside the company each year, loan interest and depreciation are deducted under company rules, and shareholders are taxed only on dividends actually distributed. That can suit a family that borrows heavily, reinvests every euro of rent, and wants to hold for decades. But the exit price is steep: when the company later sells the house, the gain is computed under company rules with no taper relief for length of ownership, and a later distribution or sale of the shares is taxed again in the shareholders’ hands, so the same economic gain can be taxed twice where a transparent SCI would have enjoyed the individual taper. An option taken to save a little tax in year two can therefore cost tens of thousands in year fifteen. Take written advice modelling both paths over your actual holding horizon before signing the option, and never let a letting agent elect for you by ticking a box on a form.

The sale itself is where the SCI most often disappoints British sellers who assumed shares and bricks were taxed alike. When a transparent SCI sells the house it owns, the gain is taxed in the shareholders’ hands under the private real-estate gains regime, because the Code provides that les plus-values réalisées par les personnes physiques ou les sociétés ou groupements qui relèvent des articles 8 à 8 ter, lors de la cession à titre onéreux de biens immobiliers bâtis ou non bâtis ou de droits relatifs à ces biens, sont passibles de l’impôt sur le revenu under Article 150 U of the General Tax Code, with taper relief growing with years of ownership and full exemption after the statutory holding period, plus social charges with their own taper. The trap is the main-home exemption: the same article exempts buildings Qui constituent la résidence principale du cédant au jour de la cession, yet where an SCI owns the house, the seller is legally the company, not you, so the exemption you would have enjoyed as a direct owner-occupier is generally lost even though you lived under that roof for years. Families who plan to live in the house permanently should weigh that loss coldly against the SCI’s inheritance advantages before choosing the vehicle, because no restructuring after the sale can recover an exemption the statute never granted to the company.

Practical discipline makes the transparent SCI work. Keep the shareholder loan accounts documented with written agreements and interest terms if interest is charged, never mix family living costs with company money without recording them as advances, hold a short annual meeting even when the two shareholders agree on everything, and file the 2072 return every year even when the house stood empty and earned nothing, because late or missing returns draw penalties and mark the file for audit. Open a dedicated French bank account in the SCI’s name, keep the purchase deed, the loan offers, the works invoices and the letting statements in one folder, and give your French accountant the British tax year summary each April so both returns reconcile. The SCI rewards organised families and punishes informal ones.

II. What does Brexit change for a British-owned SCI, and how do I challenge a French tax bill or refusal?

A. How do British owners escape the 3% yearly tax, file the right returns and handle the wealth tax?

The tax British owners fear most, the 3% annual tax on the market value of French property, the taxe de 3%, does not strike the ordinary French SCI the way rumour suggests, but it punishes opacity without mercy. The Code provides that legal entities owning French buildings or real rights directly or through an interposed entity sont redevables d’une taxe annuelle égale à 3 % de la valeur vénale de ces immeubles ou droits under Article 990 D of the General Tax Code. Read carefully: the target is the foreign company, foundation or trust sitting above French property, including through a chain of holdings, not the standard French SCI owned by named individuals that files its returns. A British family whose Dordogne house is held by a French SCI with mum, dad and two children as declared shareholders is not the natural target of the 3%. The danger cases are the British family that kept a UK limited company, a Jersey vehicle or an English trust above the French SCI or the French house, and the structure where nobody declares who ultimately owns what. The statute then opens a door back to exemption, since La taxe prévue à l’article 990 D n’est pas applicable in the listed cases under Article 990 E of the General Tax Code, and for British owners the useful route is the treaty route: entities resident in a state that has concluded with France a treaty containing an administrative assistance clause against fraud, which the France-UK treaty does, escape the tax provided they declare each year who holds what, identify shareholders above the threshold, and file on time. Miss the declaration and the exemption is lost for that year, however good the underlying treaty position.

The courts apply this strictly, and the leading modern ruling should be read by every British owner using a foreign vehicle. A Liechtenstein foundation holding French property through the years 2010 to 2014 challenged assessments totalling several million euros, arguing in substance that the declaration duties went too far and that it had nothing to hide. The Cour de cassation answered with two words that every adviser quotes since: REJETTE le pourvoi, dismissing the appeal, condemning the foundation to the costs, and ordering a further payment under Article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure. That is Cour de cassation, Commercial Chamber, 10 May 2024, No. 21-11.230. The message for a post-Brexit British structure is direct: the 3% machinery is compatible with the EU rules on movement of capital where it pursues the fight against tax evasion through proportionate declaration duties, and judges will not waive the paperwork because the owners seem respectable. Since Brexit, British entities are third-country entities, so the declaration route is not optional comfort but the only shield. File the 2746 return for the foreign entity where one exists, ensure the French SCI files its 2072, and keep proof of posting and receipts, the accusés de réception, because the first question the administration asks in every dispute is whether the return was filed, not whether the tax was substantively due.

Alongside the 3% sits the annual wealth tax on property, the impôt sur la fortune immobilière, known as IFI, which catches SCI shares by design. The Code states that Il est institué un impôt annuel sur les actifs immobiliers désigné sous le nom d’impôt sur la fortune immobilière. under Article 964 of the General Tax Code, due where the qualifying assets exceed 1,300,000 euros on 1 January. For the base, the Code counts Des parts ou actions des sociétés et organismes établis en France ou hors de France appartenant aux personnes mentionnées au 1° du présent article, à hauteur de la fraction de leur valeur représentative de biens ou droits immobiliers détenus directement ou indirectement par la société ou l’organisme. That is Article 965 of the General Tax Code. In practice, your SCI shares count for IFI up to the fraction of their value that represents French bricks, after deducting qualifying loans under the strict conditions the statute sets for debt, with anti-avoidance rules for loans taken out from family members or from companies the taxpayer controls. If you are resident in France, the threshold looks at your worldwide property; newcomers benefit from a five-year tempering on foreign assets if they were not French-resident during the previous five calendar years. If you stayed resident in Britain, only the French fraction counts, but it counts in full. Value the house honestly each 1 January with comparable sales, deduct only loans the statute allows, and file even in a borderline year, because the penalties for an unfiled IFI return exceed the cost of the advice.

When the bill or the refusal arrives, work the challenge procedure in order and never by telephone alone. First, read the assessment or the rejection letter for the remedy paragraph, the voies et délais de recours, and diary the deadline immediately, since French tax challenges run on short limitation periods and a late claim fails whatever its merits. Second, file a written administrative claim, the réclamation contentieuse, attaching the missing declaration or the treaty analysis the inspector overlooked, and ask expressly for a stay of payment, the sursis de paiement, with guarantees where required, so enforcement does not run while you argue. Third, if the administration rejects expressly or by silence, appeal to the administrative court, the tribunal administratif, within two months of the rejection, structuring the application around one clean ground per plea: wrong legal person taxed, treaty exemption with declarations filed, valuation excessive with comparables attached, or penalty disproportionate with payment history exhibited. A Paris or Île-de-France address changes the competent court and the practical pace, with the Paris tribunal handling heavy volumes, but it changes nothing in the statute, so the same file discipline applies from a Paris flat to a Périgord farmhouse.

B. What happens to my SCI shares when I sell up or die, and how do I fight the French assessment?

Selling the shares and selling the house are two different operations with two different tax bills, and British families usually choose between them when the children do not want the house. If the SCI sells the house, the transparent company pays nothing itself and each shareholder is taxed on his slice of the gain under the real-estate regime of Article 150 U described above, with taper relief for holding years. If instead you sell your shares to the buyer, the buyer takes the company with its history, its loans and its latent gains, so he will discount the price accordingly, and you are taxed on the shares under the regime for shares in property-rich companies, with the buyer’s notary, the notaire, and the registration duty adding friction. Non-resident sellers face a further mechanic: the Code provides that Sous réserve des conventions internationales, les plus-values, telles que définies aux e bis et e ter du I de l’article 164 B, réalisées par les personnes et organismes mentionnés au 2 du I lors de la cession des biens ou droits mentionnés au 3 sont soumises à un prélèvement selon les taux fixés au III bis. That is Article 244 bis A of the General Tax Code, the withholding levy on gains realised by non-residents, collected through an accredited fiscal representative, the représentant fiscal, for sellers resident outside the European Economic Area, a category that has included British sellers since Brexit. Appoint the representative before signing the preliminary contract, the compromis de vente, or the completion timetable will slip while the file waits.

Death is where the SCI shows both its strength and its limits for British families. The strength is control: the agrément clause keeps the shares in the family, the surviving spouse who is gérant keeps the administration without interruption, and the démembrement already put in place decides who enjoys the house and who owns the capital without a forced sale. The limit is tax, because France taxes the French house whatever passport the deceased held. The Code provides that duty applies to Les biens meubles et immeubles, que ces derniers soient possédés directement ou indirectement, situés en France even where the deceased was not domiciled in France, under Article 750 ter of the General Tax Code, and shares in a French SCI that owns a French house are French-situs assets through the company. A British shareholder who never left Manchester but held half a Provençal SCI therefore leaves French succession duty on that half, with the Anglo-French position then settled by treaty credit on the UK side. Within the family, an English will choosing English law for the estate under Article 22 of EU Succession Regulation No. 650/2012 can govern who inherits the shares, which our wills guide explains in detail for British wills covering French houses, but the choice of law governs devolution, not taxation: the French Treasury still applies Article 750 ter to the French assets. Keep the two questions separate in every file, one lawyer handling who gets the shares, the same file computing the duty, and the family will thank you.

Assessments on sales and successions are challenged like any French tax assessment, but the evidence differs. Against a capital gains reassessment, attack the valuation inputs first: the inspector’s comparable sales, the works invoices he disallowed, the holding period he miscounted, and the treaty residence position he assumed. Produce the completion statement, the décompte du notaire, the dated works invoices paid by bank transfer, the loan offers proving deductible financing, and the entry and exit OFII or residence documents fixing your residence on the relevant date. Against a succession reassessment, exhibit the share valuation with the company’s balance sheet, the property valuation with local comparables, the allowable liabilities with their contracts, and the will with its choice-of-law clause and probate. In both cases, follow the ladder: written claim with stay of payment, then the administrative court within two months of rejection, then appeal to the administrative court of appeal, the cour administrative d’appel, and only then the Council of State, the Conseil d’Etat, on points of law. Most British files settle or win at the claim stage when the exhibits answer the exact paragraph of the adjustment notice, the proposition de rectification, rather than arguing Brexit fairness in general terms.

Conclusion

The SCI remains a sound vehicle for a British family buying a French house, provided it is chosen for the right reasons: keeping management in one hand through the gérant, keeping buyers and strangers out through the agrément clause, and passing capital to children progressively through gifts and démembrement of shares. It is the wrong vehicle where the family wants the main-home sale exemption, where nobody will file the 2072 return each year, or where a foreign company above the SCI would drag the 3% tax into the picture. Since Brexit, treat every declaration as load-bearing: the treaty protects British owners who declare, and it does not protect structures nobody declared. Take the choice-of-law clause in your English will, the corporation-tax option, the loan paperwork and the annual valuations as seriously as the purchase price itself, and challenge every assessment on paper, on time, and on the exact article the inspector cited. The distance between Manchester and the French tax office then becomes what it should be: an administrative detail, not a defeat.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Our firm offers a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm to review your SCI project, your purchase structure, your 3% assessment, your IFI return, a sale of shares or a succession involving SCI shares. First telephone consultation: 80 EUR including VAT. Call 06 46 60 58 22, or write via our contact page with the SCI name and registration number, the purchase deed or draft articles, the assessment or refusal letter with its date, and the question you need answered.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9257 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
5 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.