Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British in France After Brexit: Your VLS-TS Validation, the OFII Track and the Tax — Late Validation, Refusal and How to Challenge an OQTF

You are British, you have just landed in France with a long-stay visa in your passport, and between the removal boxes, the French bank account and the children’s school enrolment, one administrative step has slipped through the net: validating your visa online. Weeks pass, then somebody at the prefecture, a landlord or a new employer asks for your residence permit and you realise that your visa alone no longer proves anything. Since Brexit, British nationals are third-country nationals in France, which means your right to stay depends entirely on papers you actively obtain and maintain: a visa before entry, a validated visa after arrival, then a residence permit. This guide explains, in plain English and with the exact French statutes and court decisions, how the VLS-TS works, how to validate it within the three-month deadline and pay the tax, what the OFII procedure involves after validation, what happens when validation is late or missed, and how to challenge a refusal of residence or an order to leave France. Every French term is explained the first time it appears, so you can read official letters and government websites without a dictionary.

The short answer is that a long-stay visa acting as a residence permit, known in France as a VLS-TS (visa de long sejour valant titre de sejour, a long-stay visa that counts as a residence permit for its duration), only produces its effects if you validate it online within three months of entering France and pay a dedicated tax on top of the visa fee. Without that validation, you are not lawfully resident even though your visa sticker looks valid, and you fall into the situations in which the prefecture (the local representative of the French State in each departement, the administrative district) can order you to leave France through an OQTF (obligation de quitter le territoire francais, an order to leave French territory). The good news is that each of those decisions must be reasoned in writing and can be challenged before the tribunal administratif (the administrative court), provided you act within very short time limits and keep every piece of evidence. The pages that follow set out the procedure step by step, the two court cases British readers should know, and the practical file you must build from day one.

I. How Do You Validate Your VLS-TS After Arriving in France and What Does the OFII Procedure Require?

A. Who Must Validate Within Three Months and How Do the Online Validation and the Tax Work?

French law starts from a simple principle that now applies to every British adult settling in France. Article L411-1 of the CESEDA (Code de l’entree et du sejour des etrangers et du droit d’asile, the French code governing entry, residence and asylum) provides that “tout étranger âgé de plus de dix-huit ans qui souhaite séjourner en France pour une durée supérieure à trois mois doit être titulaire de l’un des documents de séjour suivants : 1° Un visa de long séjour ; 2° Un visa de long séjour conférant à son titulaire”. In ordinary English: any foreigner over eighteen who wishes to stay in France for more than three months must hold a stay document, and the second category on the list is precisely the VLS-TS, the long-stay visa that carries the rights of a temporary residence card. Before Brexit you moved to France under EU mobility rules and none of this applied to you; today it is the gateway through which almost every British settlement passes, whether you come as a visitor with sufficient means, as an employee, as a student, as a trainee or for family reasons.

The visa itself must be obtained before you travel, from the French consular authorities in the United Kingdom. Article L312-2 of the same code states that “Tout étranger souhaitant entrer en France en vue d’y séjourner pour une durée supérieure à trois mois doit solliciter auprès des autorités diplomatiques et consulaires françaises un visa de long séjour dont la durée de validité ne peut être supérieure à un an.” The same article adds that the visa can authorise a stay of more than three months for family reasons, as a visitor, as a student, as a trainee or for professional activity, and more generally any stay of more than three months conferring the rights of a temporary residence card or of several listed multi-year cards. Two practical points follow for British readers. First, the sticker in your passport is capped at one year and it states its category, visiteur (visitor), salarie (employee), etudiant (student), vie privee et familiale (private and family life) or another label: read it carefully, because the category determines what you are allowed to do in France, and in particular whether you may work. A visiteur visa never authorises employment, while a salarie visa is tied to the authorised job. Second, holders of a Withdrawal Agreement residence card, the carte de sejour mention accord de retrait du Royaume-Uni de l’UE, are outside this entire procedure: they already hold a residence permit and never validate a visa. If you were lawfully settled in France before 1 January 2021 and hold that card, this guide is not about you, though the sections on challenging an OQTF remain useful background.

Once you have entered France on a VLS-TS, the decisive step is validation, and it is entirely your responsibility: no office sends you a reminder. The official service-public.fr information page states the rule plainly: you must validate your VLS-TS and pay the tax, charged on top of the visa fee, within three months of arriving in France (service-public.fr, long-stay visa page) In practice you validate on the ANEF portal (Administration numerique pour les etrangers en France, the Interior Ministry’s online platform for foreign nationals, reachable at the ANEF online portal), where you enter the visa sticker number, your arrival date and your address in France, and you pay the validation tax online by bank card or with electronic fiscal stamps. The dedicated service-public.fr procedure page, Valider un visa de long sejour valant titre de sejour (VLS-TS) et payer la taxe, walks through the same online steps. Keep in mind three details that cause most British failures. The three-month period runs from the date you physically entered France, shown by your passport stamp or your travel proof, not from the visa issue date and not from the day you found permanent housing. The validation and the tax payment are inseparable: an online file left unpaid is not a validated visa. And the confirmation you receive at the end of the process, usually a PDF validation certificate to print, is the document that turns your visa sticker into a proven residence right for landlords, employers, banks and the prefecture: save it in several places and keep the payment receipt with it.

Validation also triggers two obligations that surprise many newcomers. First, anyone applying for a stay document signs a republican commitment contract. Article L412-7 of the CESEDA provides that “L’étranger qui sollicite un document de séjour s’engage, par la souscription d’un contrat d’engagement au respect des principes de la République, à respecter la liberté personnelle, la liberté d’expression et de conscience, l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes, la dignité de la personne humaine, la devise et les symboles de la République au sens de l’article 2 de la Constitution, l’intégrité territoriale, définie par les frontières nationales, et à ne pas se prévaloir de ses croyances ou de ses convictions pour s’affranchir des règles communes régissant les relations entre les services publics et les particuliers.” This is a signed undertaking attached to your file, not a language test, and a fresh contract is signed at each renewal application. Second, the British side of the Channel matters for your planning but never replaces French papers. The United Kingdom government’s guidance for Britons settling in France, Living in France on gov.uk, and its France entry requirements page, remind travellers that passports must meet validity rules and that stays without a visa are capped at 90 days in any 180-day period across the Schengen area. Those pages are useful for planning visits, but for a move of more than three months only the French visa and its validation count. A common and costly misunderstanding is to believe that owning a French house, having French health cover or paying French tax creates a residence right by itself: it does not. Only the validated visa, then the residence card, proves lawful stay.

B. What Happens After Validation: the OFII Summons, the Medical Examination and the Papers You Must Keep?

After you validate online, your file passes to the OFII (Office francais de l’immigration et de l’integration, the French office for immigration and integration), the public body that organises the reception track for newly arrived foreign nationals. Depending on your visa category, the OFII may summon you to a medical examination, carried out by an OFII-approved doctor, and for certain categories to additional reception appointments. The summons arrives by post or by email at the address you declared during validation, which is why a stable postal address from the first week matters enormously: students in university housing, employees in temporary corporate flats and retirees moving between a holiday home and a rental lose summonses every year, then face complications for something they never received. If you move within France during your first year, update your address on the ANEF portal immediately and keep proof of the change. Attend every OFII appointment with your passport, your visa, your validation certificate and, where relevant, your employment contract or school certificates, and keep the attendance documents the OFII hands back to you.

The medical examination itself is straightforward and nothing to worry about, but it is compulsory when the OFII orders it. It generally includes a general clinical check and, for adults, screening examinations that the doctor explains on the day. At the end of the track the OFII records that you have completed the required steps, and your validated VLS-TS remains your residence document until it expires. Do not expect a separate plastic card during this first year: for a VLS-TS holder, the combination of the passport sticker plus the printed validation certificate plus the tax payment receipt is the residence permit in practical terms. Show all three together whenever an employer runs a right-to-work check, a landlord asks for a titre de sejour (residence permit), or a bank opens a resident account. Keep certified copies or clear scans apart from the originals, because replacing a lost validation certificate from abroad is slow and stressful.

The final months of your VLS-TS year deserve the same discipline as the first three months. A VLS-TS expires at the latest on its printed expiry date and it cannot be extended: you must apply for a residence card before it ends. Article L412-1 of the CESEDA provides that “Sous réserve des engagements internationaux de la France et des exceptions prévues aux articles L. 412-2 et L. 412-3, la première délivrance d’une carte de séjour temporaire ou d’une carte de séjour pluriannuelle est subordonnée à la production par l’étranger du visa de long séjour mentionné aux 1° ou 2° de l’article L. 411-1.” In plain terms, your first carte de sejour temporaire (one-year residence card) or carte de sejour pluriannuelle (multi-year residence card) is issued on the strength of the long-stay visa, which means a missing or unvalidated visa poisons the renewal as well as the first year. Apply online through ANEF two to four months before expiry, in the category matching your situation on the day of the application rather than the category of your original visa where your life has changed, for example from etudiant to salarie after graduation, or from visiteur to vie privee et familiale after marriage to a French resident. While the prefecture examines the renewal, it issues a recepisse (a receipt acknowledging your renewal application) that authorises you to stay and, in most employment-linked cases, to keep working. Never travel outside France without checking that your validation certificate, your expiry-date calculation and, where applicable, your recepisse are all in order, because border officers read dates, not intentions.

Two worked examples show how the pieces fit together. Take Susan, aged sixty-four, who sells her semi in Kent and moves to the Dordogne on a visiteur VLS-TS with pension income and private health insurance for the first year. She enters France on 10 March, validates online on 28 March and pays the tax the same day, receives her OFII summons at her rented cottage in April, attends the medical examination in Perigueux in May and keeps every document in a dedicated folder. When she applies for her first carte de sejour temporaire visiteur the following January, her file shows an unbroken chain: entry stamp, validation certificate, tax receipt, OFII attendance note, proof of address, proof of means and health cover. Contrast this with David, aged forty-one, hired by a Paris technology company on a salarie VLS-TS. He enters France on 2 September, starts work immediately, assumes his employer’s immigration provider handles everything, and discovers in February that nothing was ever validated. His visa sticker looks valid until August, but administratively he has no proven residence right, his employer’s right-to-work file is defective, and his renewal application the following summer will start from a gap he cannot paper over. The difference between the two files is not money or luck: it is a dated online validation, a tax receipt and a folder.

II. What Happens If Your Validation Is Late or Missing and How Do You Challenge a Refusal or an OQTF?

A. Why Does Late Validation Leave You Without a Right to Stay and Expose You to an OQTF?

The legal consequence of a missed validation is blunt: once the three-month window closes without validation, you are staying in France without a valid stay document, and the prefecture may treat you as unlawfully present even while your visa sticker still shows a future expiry date. Article L611-1 of the CESEDA lists the situations in which “L’autorité administrative peut obliger un étranger à quitter le territoire français lorsqu’il se trouve dans les cas suivants : 1° L’étranger, ne pouvant justifier être entré régulièrement sur le territoire français, s’y est maintenu sans être titulaire d’un titre de séjour en cours de validité ; 2° L’étranger, entré sur le territoire français sous couvert d’un visa désormais expiré ou, n’étant pas soumis à l’obligation du visa, entré en France plus de trois mois auparavant, s’est maintenu sur le territoire français sans être titulaire d’un titre de séjour ou, le cas échéant, sans demander le renouvellement du titre de séjour temporaire ou pluriannuel qui lui a été délivré ; 3° L’étranger s’est vu refuser la délivrance d’un titre de séjour, le renouvellement du titre de séjour, du document provisoire délivré à l’occasion d’une demande de titre de séjour ou de l’autorisation provisoire de séjour qui lui avait été délivré ou s’est vu retirer un de ces documents”. A British holder of an unvalidated VLS-TS typically falls under the first or the second of these cases: no valid stay document can be produced, or the stay continues without the required validated document having been secured. The third case then takes over at the next stage, because the prefecture refuses the subsequent residence card on the ground that the underlying visa was never validated, and attaches an OQTF to that refusal. Each step follows the previous one with administrative logic, and none of them requires any fault beyond the missing validation.

An OQTF is not a simple invitation to leave: it is a formal administrative decision that sets a departure timetable, designates the country of return, and is very often accompanied by an interdiction de retour sur le territoire francais (a re-entry ban, usually called an IRTF), which forbids coming back to France and to the Schengen area for a fixed period. It can also refuse or withdraw any voluntary departure period, the delai de depart volontaire, where the prefecture considers that you may abscond or that your presence threatens public order. The courts review these combined decisions as a package, and the published case law shows how strictly judges read the underlying papers. In one case examined by the administrative court of appeal of Douai, CAA Douai, 2nd chamber, decision No 23DA01094, the file concerned a foreign national who asked the administrative court of Lille to cancel a prefectural order, since the applicant had asked the tribunal administratif of Lille to cancel the 2 February 2023 order by which the prefect of the Nord had obliged him to leave France without delay, fixed the destination country and imposed a one-year re-entry ban The package under challenge is exactly the one a British reader with a defective file would face: an OQTF without a voluntary departure period, a designated destination country and a one-year re-entry ban. The lesson is practical rather than theoretical: by the time the prefecture signs such an order, the argument that you own a house, that your children are in a French school or that you simply forgot a website form carries almost no weight against dated documents, and only a properly built legal challenge can suspend or cancel the effects.

A second decision illustrates the limits of the VLS-TS route itself when the underlying conditions are not met. In CAA Paris, 5th chamber, decision No 20PA03449, the applicant had sought cancellation of a prefectural refusal to issue a long-stay visa acting as a residence permit as the spouse of a French national, together with an order requiring the prefecture to issue it. The Paris court examined the file against the statutory conditions for that category, including regular entry and a sufficient prior stay, and the reasoning turned entirely on whether the documents proved each condition on the relevant date. For British readers the message cuts two ways. Where you apply for the wrong VLS-TS category, for example a visiteur visa while planning to work, or a family visa without the required civil-status evidence, the prefecture can lawfully refuse and the court will uphold the refusal if the papers do not match the category. And where you hold the right visa but never validate it, you arrive at the same wall one year later dressed differently: the prefecture refuses the residence card because the validated visa that Article L412-1 demands as its foundation is absent from the file. Either way, the dispute is won or lost on dated, categorised, matching documents, never on general fairness.

Beyond the prefecture, an unvalidated visa damages everyday legal life in ways British newcomers rarely anticipate. Employers in France face criminal and administrative penalties for employing a worker without a valid work authorisation, so a human-resources department that discovers an unvalidated salarie VLS-TS must suspend the employment relationship until the situation is regularised, and many simply terminate the contract during the trial period instead. Landlords and letting agencies increasingly verify residence documents before signing or renewing leases, and banks periodically review the residence status attached to resident accounts. Travel becomes hazardous: leaving France with an expired or unvalidated stay document risks refusal of re-entry at the border, while remaining means accumulating unlawful presence that stains every later application, including any future visitor, student or work visa filed from London. None of these consequences is a punishment for dishonesty; they are the automatic effects of a file without the validation certificate at its centre. That is why the first reaction to discovering a missed validation must never be to wait for the expiry date or to hope the prefecture overlooks the gap, but to assemble the evidence and seek advice immediately, while the file can still be repaired or challenged.

B. How Do You Challenge a Refusal of Residence or an OQTF Before the Administrative Court?

Every refusal and every removal order must be given to you in a reasoned written decision, and that document is the starting point of any challenge. Article L613-1 of the CESEDA provides that “La décision portant obligation de quitter le territoire français est motivée. Elle est édictée après vérification du droit au séjour, en tenant notamment compte de la durée de présence de l’étranger sur le territoire français, de la nature et de l’ancienneté de ses liens avec la France et des considérations humanitaires pouvant justifier un tel droit.” “Dans le cas prévu au 3° de l’article L. 611-1, la décision portant obligation de quitter le territoire français n’a pas à faire l’objet d’une motivation distincte de celle de la décision relative au séjour.” “Toutefois, les motifs des décisions relatives au délai de départ volontaire et à l’interdiction de retour édictées le cas échéant sont indiqués.” Read the decision the day you receive it and check four things: which of the cases in Article L611-1 the prefecture relies on, what it says about your length of presence, your family and private ties and any humanitarian considerations, whether it grants or refuses a voluntary departure period with reasons, and whether a re-entry ban is attached with its duration and reasons. Any missing or copy-pasted reasoning is a potential ground for cancellation, because the prefecture must examine your personal situation rather than stamp a template. Keep the envelope with its postmark, photograph each page, and note the exact date and method of notification, since the time limit for court action runs from that notification and it is counted in days, not weeks.

The main remedy is an appeal to the tribunal administratif, the administrative court for the area of the prefecture that signed the decision. Article L614-1 of the CESEDA provides that “La décision portant obligation de quitter le territoire français ainsi que la décision relative au séjour, la décision relative au délai de départ volontaire et l’interdiction de retour sur le territoire français qui l’accompagnent, le cas échéant, peuvent être contestées devant le tribunal administratif selon la procédure prévue à l’article L. 911-1.” A specialised accelerated timetable then applies, which is why speed matters more than polish: the court must rule within weeks, and in detention or assigned-residence configurations within days. Where the foreign national is placed under assigned residence, article L614-2 adds that “lorsque l’étranger est assigné à résidence en application de l’ article L. 731-1 , la décision portant obligation de quitter le territoire français ainsi que la décision relative au séjour, la décision relative au délai de départ volontaire et l’interdiction de retour sur le territoire français qui l’accompagnent, le cas échéant, peuvent être contestées devant le tribunal administratif selon la procédure prévue à l’ article L. 921-1 . Lorsque l’étranger est placé en rétention administrative, ces décisions peuvent être contestées devant le tribunal administratif selon la procédure prévue à l’ article L. 921-2 .” Assigned residence (assignation a residence, an order confining you to a defined area with regular reporting to the police or gendarmerie) and administrative detention (retention administrative, holding in a dedicated centre pending removal) are the enforcement tools that accompany contested OQTFs, and each has its own judge and its own forty-eight-hour style clock. If you are served with either, contact a lawyer the same day and do not sign any statement you do not fully understand.

A re-entry ban imposed after the OQTF has its own autonomous challenge. Article L614-4 of the CESEDA provides that “L’interdiction de retour sur le territoire français édictée en application de l’article L. 612-7 après la décision portant obligation de quitter le territoire français peut être contestée devant le tribunal administratif selon la procédure prévue à l’article L. 921-1 ou, lorsque l’étranger est placé en rétention administrative, selon la procédure prévue à l’article L. 921-2. Lorsque le tribunal administratif est saisi de requêtes distinctes tendant l’une à l’annulation d’une décision portant obligation de quitter le territoire français et l’autre à l’annulation d’une interdiction de retour sur le territoire français édictée postérieurement en application de l’article L. 612-7, il statue par une seule décision, dans le délai prévu pour statuer sur l’obligation de quitter le territoire français.” In practice this means you challenge the ban together with the OQTF wherever possible, asking the court to annul both, or at least to shorten the ban and restore a voluntary departure period so that a later visa application from the United Kingdom is not automatically doomed. Judges look at proportionality: length of lawful presence, intensity of family and private life in France, health considerations, behaviour since arrival, and genuine prospects of regularisation. A British retiree with two years of validated presence, a French home, continuous health cover and a single missed renewal deadline is judged very differently from a newcomer whose file shows neither validation nor ties, which is another reason to keep every proof of integration from the first month.

Alongside the court appeal, always consider a parallel request to the prefecture itself asking it to withdraw or reconsider the decision in the light of new documents, for example a validation completed late where the portal exceptionally accepted it, fresh medical evidence, a marriage, or a child’s schooling certificates. Such a reconsideration request does not suspend the removal order and does not extend the court deadline, so it must never replace the tribunal appeal: file both, and tell the court about the pending reconsideration so the judge has the complete picture. Your court file should contain, in chronological order, the passport pages with the visa sticker and entry stamp, the ANEF validation certificate and tax receipt or a dated account of the failed validation attempts with screenshots, the OFII summonses and attendance notes, the prefecture’s refusal and OQTF with its notification envelope, proof of address for every month of presence, proof of means such as pension statements or employment contracts and payslips, health cover documents, family ties such as marriage certificates or children’s school enrolments, and any evidence of integration such as language course certificates. Number the exhibits, translate the essential English documents into French through a certified translator (traducteur assermente, a translator sworn before a French court of appeal), and keep originals for the hearing. Most OQTF appeals can be filed and argued with the help of a lawyer working from copies while you remain reachable at your declared address, but do not leave France while the case is pending without written advice: departure can render the appeal moot and activate the re-entry ban.

Conclusion

The VLS-TS system rewards British newcomers who treat administration as part of the move itself. Validate online within three months of entry, pay the tax the same day, keep the certificate and the receipt with your passport, attend every OFII appointment, update your address at once, and apply for your first residence card months before the visa expires: that chain of dated papers is your residence right, and any missing link breaks it. If the link is already broken, do not wait for the expiry date and do not rely on property, tax payments or good intentions to fill the gap. Read the prefecture’s decision the day it arrives, note the notification date, challenge the OQTF and any re-entry ban before the tribunal administratif within the short deadline, and ask the prefecture in parallel to reconsider on the basis of complete new evidence. The statutes quoted in this guide show both sides of the system: strict conditions on entry and stay, and reasoned decisions open to a judge’s review. A documented file, lodged on time, is how you move from the first side to the second.

Need a quick opinion on your case.

Telephone consultation: 80 EUR TTC with an avocat of the firm within 48 hours. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via the contact page. Bring your visa sticker, your entry stamp, your ANEF validation certificate or the screenshots of your validation attempts, the OFII letters, the prefecture’s refusal or OQTF with its envelope, and your proofs of address, means and health cover, so the advice starts from your papers, not from generalities.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.