Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Foreign Director of a French Company Living Abroad: SAS President or SARL Manager Pay, Social Charges and Tax

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore and you run a French company. Every month the same questions come back: how do I pay myself legally as a foreign director, what will URSSAF (the French social contributions collection agency) claim, what will the French tax office withhold if I am not a French tax resident, and which vehicle, SAS or SARL, leaves me with the lowest lawful cost and the lowest risk? This guide answers those questions for the two companies foreign founders actually use in France: the SAS (societe par actions simplifiee, a simplified joint-stock company run by a president) and the SARL (societe a responsabilite limitee, a limited liability company run by one or several gerants, or managers). It explains every French acronym as it goes, gives the exact legal texts and court decisions that decide your case, and ends with the calendar and the defence procedure to use when URSSAF or the tax office knocks while you live abroad. Read it as the companion to our formation hub for foreign founders, which covers incorporation, the corporate bank account, the Kbis (the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe, the court registry) and VAT registration: setting up a company in France as a foreign founder. The present article goes one step further and deals only with the director: status, pay, social charges and tax.

I. How should a foreign founder pay himself as president of a SAS or manager of a SARL while living abroad?

A. Should you take pay as SAS president under the general scheme, dividends, or management fees from abroad?

The SAS is the default choice of foreign founders because it is flexible and because its president belongs to the general social security scheme by assimilation, not to the self-employed scheme. The starting point is company law. Article L227-6 of the Commercial Code provides, word for word: “La société est représentée à l’égard des tiers par un président désigné dans les conditions prévues par les statuts.” In plain English, the president represents the company vis-a-vis third parties, holds the widest powers to act in the name of the company within the corporate purpose, and any internal limit written in the articles cannot be opposed to third parties. The SAS itself, under Article L227-1 of the Commercial Code, “peut être instituée par une ou plusieurs personnes qui ne supportent les pertes qu’à concurrence de leur apport”, which means one or several founders bear losses only up to their contributions. For a foreign founder this matters because the president can sign, hire, open the bank account and bind the company from day one, even before a full board exists, since there is no board in a SAS.

Social security follows automatically once the president is paid. Article L311-3 of the Social Security Code lists, at paragraph 23: “Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées et des sociétés d’exercice libéral par actions simplifiées”. Those words mean that every paid SAS president is compulsorily affiliated to the general scheme (regime general), exactly like an employee for health, family and retirement purposes, even though he is not an employee under labour law. The official Service-Public guide for company directors confirms this assimilation and details the contributions due on a SAS president’s pay: protection sociale du dirigeant de societe, and the companion page on SAS social contributions: cotisations sociales d’une SAS. Concretely, a paid president costs roughly 75 to 82 percent of his gross pay in combined employer and employee charges at the top of the scale, with a lighter bill at the bottom because health and family contributions are reduced on low pay and because the CSG and CRDS (the two general social levies on all income) apply at their own rates. The base rule is Article L242-1 of the Social Security Code: “Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues au titre de l’affiliation au régime général des personnes mentionnées aux articles L. 311-2 et L. 311-3 sont assises sur les revenus d’activité tels qu’ils sont pris en compte pour la détermination de l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-1-1 .” Every euro of president pay, including bonuses and benefits in kind such as a company flat or car, falls into that base, and the contributions are due for the period to which the income relates, not the period in which cash is wired abroad.

Three court decisions, all published on the Cour de cassation website, lock this analysis in place and every foreign president should know them before choosing between pay and dividends. First, the Second Civil Chamber held on 15 May 2025, appeal number 23-13.763 (Cass. 2e civ., 15 May 2025, No. 23-13.763), that a SAS director “était assujetti par assimilation au régime général en sa qualité de président d’une société par actions simplifiée, de sorte qu’il ne pouvait prétendre à ce titre au service l’indemnité conventionnelle de départ à la retraite prévue pour les salariés de la catégorie des cadres dirigeants”. Translation: assimilation to the general scheme gives you health cover and a basic and supplementary pension, but it does not turn you into an employee. You cannot claim the employees’ collectively agreed retirement bonus, and symmetrically the company cannot deduct or exempt your package as if you were a mere executive employee. Founders who promise themselves a cadre dirigeant leaving indemnity through the articles should delete that clause now, because URSSAF will reintegrate it and the courts will uphold the reassessment. Second, the same chamber held on 15 March 2018, appeal number 17-15.192 (Cass. 2e civ., 15 March 2018, No. 17-15.192), “ayant constaté que M. X… avait la qualité de président d’une société par actions simplifiée, ce dont il résultait que l’intéressé ne pouvait être assujetti au régime de protection sociale des exploitants, le tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale en a exactement déduit que l’intéressé ne pouvait être tenu personnellement au paiement des cotisations faisant l’objet de la contrainte litigieuse”. In other words, a SAS president can never be pushed into the farmers’ or self-employed scheme by mistake, and a constraint (contrainte, the enforceable collection order) issued on the wrong legal basis must be annulled. If you receive an URSSAF or MSA constraint mentioning the wrong scheme, that single paragraph is your annulment argument.

Pay is therefore protective but expensive, which is why most foreign presidents combine a modest salary with dividends. Dividends are not salary: they are company profits distributed to shareholders and they bear no URSSAF contributions, only the single flat tax of 30 percent for French residents (12.8 percent income tax plus 17.2 percent social levies) or the withholding tax for non-residents. The definition sits in Article 120 of the General Tax Code: “Sont considérés comme revenus au sens du présent article : 1° Les dividendes, intérêts, arrérages et tous autres produits des actions de toute nature”. When those dividends leave France to a shareholder who is not a French tax resident, Article 119 bis of the General Tax Code applies: “Les produits visés aux articles 108 à 117 bis donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source dont le taux est fixé par l’article 187 lorsque leurs bénéficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur siège en France”. The standard rate is 25 percent for companies and 21 percent for individuals in many cases, reduced by most tax treaties (often 15 percent, sometimes 5 percent for a parent company holding at least 10 percent), provided the foreign shareholder proves residence with the treaty form before the payment date. A president who lives abroad and takes only dividends pays no French social charges at all, but he earns no French health cover, no French pension quarters and no daily allowances, and a zero-pay president who works full time in France may still be reclassified if the facts show undeclared work. The balanced practice for a founder who needs French cover is a salary around one to two times the annual social security ceiling (21,756 euros in 2026 per ceiling unit, adjusted yearly), which opens full health, maternity, paternity and basic pension rights, topped up with dividends once the company is profitable. The official company page on SAS taxation and the impots.gouv.fr guides for non-residents confirm the mechanics: SAS, ce qu’il faut savoir and impots.gouv.fr, the French tax administration portal.

Two traps await the foreign president who tries to invoice the French company from abroad instead of taking salary. The first is the non-resident withholding on wages. Article 182 A of the General Tax Code states: “les traitements, salaires, pensions et rentes viagères, de source française, servis à des personnes qui ne sont pas fiscalement domiciliées en France donnent lieu à l’application d’une retenue à la source”. A president who performs his duties in France but is paid into a London, New York or Dubai account remains taxable in France on the French-source pay, with the 12 and 20 percent withholding bands above 17,275 euros, creditable against his final French income tax bill. Moving the bank account does not move the taxing right. The second trap is the management-fee invoice from a foreign parent or personal holding company for the president’s own work. URSSAF and the tax auditor treat fees paid to a foreign entity for functions that are in substance the president’s mandate as disguised salary, reintegrate them into the contribution base with penalties of 5 to 25 percent plus late interest, and the corporate income tax auditor disallows them as abnormal management charges unless a detailed service agreement, time sheets, cost-plus benchmarking and proof of actual distinct services exist. A one-page annual invoice labelled strategy advice with no deliverables is routinely struck down. If the group genuinely provides back-office, IT or sales support, sign a written intra-group agreement before the year starts, price each service line at arm’s length, keep monthly reports, and have the French SAS formally approve the agreement under the regulated-agreements procedure so that the statutory auditor can review it. Otherwise take regulated pay and documented dividends and sleep well.

B. Why does the SARL manager route cost less in contributions but expose a foreign majority manager?

The SARL works on the opposite logic. Article L223-18 of the Commercial Code opens with: “La société à responsabilité limitée est gérée par une ou plusieurs personnes physiques.” The gerant, or manager, must be a natural person, may be chosen outside the shareholders, is appointed by the shareholders, and in dealings with third parties “le gérant est investi des pouvoirs les plus étendus pour agir en toute circonstance au nom de la société, sous réserve des pouvoirs que la loi attribue expressément aux associés”. Like the SAS president he binds the company even beyond the corporate purpose unless the third party knew of the excess, and internal limits cannot be opposed to outsiders. The difference lies entirely in social security. A minority or equal-share manager, who alone or together with co-managers holds no more than half of the capital, counting the shares of spouse, civil partner and minor children, belongs to the general scheme. Article L311-3, paragraph 11, of the Social Security Code says exactly: “11° Les gérants de sociétés à responsabilité limitée et de sociétés d’exercice libéral à responsabilité limitée à condition que lesdits gérants ne possèdent pas ensemble plus de la moitié du capital social, étant entendu que les parts appartenant, en toute propriété ou en usufruit, au conjoint, au partenaire lié par un pacte civil de solidarité et aux enfants mineurs non émancipés d’un gérant sont considérées comme possédées par ce dernier”. Every other manager, and in practice every foreign founder who keeps 60, 80 or 100 percent of his SARL, is a travailleur independant, a self-employed worker affiliated to the SSI (securite sociale des independants, the self-employed fund administered within the general system) and to URSSAF for collection. Article L131-6 of the Social Security Code fixes the rule: “Les cotisations de sécurité sociale dues par les travailleurs indépendants non agricoles ne relevant pas du dispositif prévu à l’article L. 613-7 sont assises sur l’assiette définie à l’article L. 136-3.” In practice the majority manager pays roughly 40 to 45 percent of his professional income in social charges, against 75 to 82 percent for a SAS president at equivalent gross, but receives thinner cover: daily sickness allowances only after 90 days of affiliation and under strict conditions, no unemployment insurance at all, a basic pension computed on lower contributions, and complementary pension through the RCI (retraite complementaire des independants) with fewer options. The 15 March 2018 decision quoted above is the mirror image of this rule: because the man was a SAS president he could not be forced into the self-employed scheme, and symmetrically because you are a majority SARL manager you cannot claim the general scheme even if you would prefer it.

For a founder living abroad the SARL therefore looks cheap and proves risky in three precise situations. First, health cover: a majority manager who does not reside in France and pays self-employed contributions in France may end up paying twice, once in France on his manager pay and once in his country of residence for real health cover, without ever reaching the French presence thresholds that open PUMA (protection universelle maladie, the universal residence-based health cover) rights. A SAS president faces the same issue, but his higher contributions at least buy him a portable European record and, if he is an EU national posted or multi-active, coordination under the EU regulations with an A1 certificate. Second, the combined salary-dividend optimisation is narrower in a SARL: the majority manager’s dividends above 10 percent of the capital plus retained earnings are reintegrated into the self-employed contribution base, a specific anti-abuse surcharge that has no equivalent in a SAS, where dividends never bear contributions regardless of amount. A foreign founder who plans to distribute large profits quickly will usually save five figures a year by choosing the SAS. Third, credibility with banks, landlords and the prefecture: the Kbis of a SAS with a president, a proper payroll record and DSN history (the declaration sociale nominative, the single monthly payroll return) reads better in a KYC file than a SARL whose manager takes only drawings. None of this makes the SARL unusable: for a small family business with one French-resident majority manager, low drawings and modest profits, the SARL remains the cheapest lawful envelope, and the Service-Public SARL guide plus the INPI one-stop shop (guichet unique, the single online filing portal for all company formalities at inpi.fr) walk you through registration. But a non-resident founder who keeps control, travels constantly and wants scalable pay plus dividends should default to the SAS, accept the higher contribution rate on a capped salary, and take the rest in treaty-protected dividends. Put the choice in the articles on day one, because converting a SARL into a SAS later costs auditor fees, a unanimous or qualified majority vote, a full tax neutrality file and a new Kbis, BODACC announcement (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the official gazette where company events are published) and bank re-KYC, all billable while the business waits.

II. How do you declare, file and survive an URSSAF or tax challenge on your director income from abroad?

A. Where and when do you declare director pay, withhold tax and file company accounts from abroad?

Once the vehicle is chosen, everything becomes a calendar, and the foreign director who misses a date pays for it in penalties. Start with social declarations. Every SAS president who receives pay must appear in the monthly DSN filed by the company or its payroll provider, generally by the 5th or 15th of the following month depending on headcount, with payment of contributions to URSSAF on the same cycle. The DPAE (declaration prealable a l’embauche, the pre-hiring declaration) does not apply to a pure mandate without an employment contract, but it applies the day the director also hires himself or anyone else under an employment contract, and our first-hire guide details that parallel track. Affiliation itself is automatic upon first pay: the company registers the president with URSSAF, which opens health, family, work-accident and pension branches, while the majority SARL manager is registered with URSSAF and the SSI on the same first euro. Keep a French correspondence address with your accountant, activate the URSSAF online account with two-factor authentication that works on a foreign phone number, and mandate the accountant to receive and pay every notice, because a letter to an old Paris Airbnb that you never open still starts limitation periods against you. Annual pay summaries, the DADS-U successor data embedded in the DSN, feed directly into the prefilled income tax return, so a mismatch between the DSN and the tax return is the single most common trigger of a joint URSSAF and tax control for directors.

Tax filings follow their own rhythm on impots.gouv.fr. A director who is a French tax resident declares worldwide salary and dividends in the May online return (form 2042 with supplement 2042-C PRO for self-employed manager income and 2047 for foreign-source elements), pays the monthly or quarterly instalments, and lets the 182 A withholding impute against the final bill under Article 197 A. A director who is not a French tax resident but receives French-source director pay declares only that French-source income in the non-resident return, suffers the 182 A withholding at source, and claims the treaty rate or exemption with form 5000/5001 stamped by his home tax authority before payment where the treaty allows. Dividends follow the 119 bis withholding with the 2777 fund return filed by the distributing company, and the foreign shareholder claims the treaty reduction through the standard 5000 procedure. Companies themselves close accounts once a year, approve them in an ordinary general meeting within six months of year-end (30 June for a 31 December year-end), and file them with the greffe within one month of approval, or two months if filed electronically via the INPI guichet unique, after which the filing is announced and the updated figures feed the public record behind the Kbis. Late filing costs a court injunction from the greffe, a fine of 1,500 euros, and in practice a frozen bank file at the exact moment you apply for a loan or a lease. Add the CFE (cotisation fonciere des entreprises, the local business premises tax) billed every autumn to every company with French premises, the DAS2 return for fees paid to third parties above 1,200 euros per beneficiary, and the RBE (registre des beneficiaires effectifs, the beneficial owners register) update within 30 days of any change in control or identity document, and you have the full legal calendar of a French company run from abroad. Diary all of them with your accountant in January, not in June.

B. How do you answer an URSSAF reassessment or a non-resident tax notice without flying to Paris?

Controls start on paper and most are won on paper, provided you know the procedure and the two decisions that frame it. An URSSAF control opens with a notice, continues with on-site or on-document inspection, and must close with a lettre d’observations (the written findings letter) that lists every ground of reassessment and the documents relied on. The Cour de cassation polices that letter strictly. On 4 June 2026, appeal number 23-20.189 (Cass. 2e civ., 4 June 2026, No. 23-20.189), the Second Civil Chamber restated: “Selon l’article R. 243-59 du code de la sécurité sociale, dans sa rédaction applicable à la date du contrôle, la lettre d’observations doit mentionner l’ensemble des documents consultés par l’inspecteur du recouvrement ayant servi à établir le bien-fondé du redressement.” If the letter cites a management agreement, invoices or accounting pages without listing them as consulted documents, the reassessment falls for breach of adversarial procedure, even if the underlying pay was genuinely taxable. Your first reflex upon receiving any URSSAF letter from abroad should therefore be a completeness check: compare the documents listed on page 3 of the letter with the documents actually requested during the control, photograph every missing reference, and raise the R. 243-59 plea in the written reply within the 30-day adversarial period, then before the CRA (commission de recours amiable, the internal appeal board) within two months of the formal demand. Never let the 30 days lapse because you were travelling: a one-page holding reply by email plus a registered letter from your counsel preserves the right to expand later.

The same discipline applies on the tax side. A non-resident director who disputes a 182 A withholding or a 119 bis dividend withholding files a written claim (reclamation) with the non-residents tax office, attaches the treaty residence certificate, the payroll or dividend vouchers, the DSN extracts and the bank proof of the withholding, and asks for restitution of the excess within the statutory claim deadline, generally 31 December of the second year following collection. If the claim is rejected expressly or by silence after six months, appeal lies to the administrative court, where the judge checks the source of the income, the place of the duties actually performed (boarding passes, calendar invites and meeting minutes beat assertions), and the correct treaty article for directors’ fees versus salaries versus dividends. Two practical moves decide most files. First, prove where the work was done: a president who sat in the Paris office three days a week is taxable in France on that slice even if his contract says London, while a president who can show that the duties were performed entirely from abroad with dated deliverables can lawfully shrink the French-source fraction. Second, separate the hats: keep the mandate minutes, the employment contract if one genuinely exists with distinct technical duties under a real chain of subordination, and the shareholder resolutions on dividends in three different folders, because inspectors love to collapse everything into salary. The 15 May 2025 decision above is your shield against the reverse error: assimilation to the general scheme does not create an employment contract, so an inspector cannot grant or deny you an employee-only bonus by pretending you are an employee when it suits the reassessment. Answer every inspector in French, on time, through a Paris counsel with a postal mandate, join numbered exhibits, and ask for a face-to-face or video hearing before the CRA: files argued in person settle far more often than files left to rot in a foreign inbox. When the stakes exceed a few thousand euros, engage counsel the day the control notice arrives, not the day the constraint lands on your accountant’s desk.

Conclusion

A foreign founder does not have to choose between overpaying and cheating. Take a real, declared SAS president salary up to the level that buys health cover and pension quarters, document it in the DSN and the tax return, and distribute the surplus as treaty-protected dividends under Articles 120 and 119 bis once profits exist. If you prefer the SARL, accept the self-employed arithmetic of Article L131-6 with open eyes: cheaper today, thinner cover tomorrow, and a dividend surcharge above the 10 percent threshold that often wipes out the saving for profitable companies. In both vehicles, calendar discipline at the INPI guichet unique, the greffe, URSSAF and impots.gouv.fr, plus a procedure-ready defence file built around Articles L242-1, L311-3, R243-59 and the three Cour de cassation decisions of 2018, 2025 and 2026, is what separates a founder who runs France from abroad from a founder who is run by his French mail. Set the structure, the pay slip and the diary right this quarter, and next year’s control letter, if it ever comes, will read like routine instead of a threat.

Need a quick opinion on your case

About to choose between a SAS presidency and a SARL management mandate, or facing an URSSAF reassessment, a disputed director salary or a withholding on pay or dividends while running your French company from abroad? Our firm offers a phone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm to review your status, your pay slips and your deadlines. Phone consultation: 80 EUR including VAT (80 EUR TTC). Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write through our contact page. Our office in Paris advises foreign founders and groups across Paris and Ile-de-France and from abroad in English.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.