Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British LPA Refused in France After Brexit: Bank and Notaire Blockages, French Protection Routes and How to Challenge a Refusal

Your mother lives near Bergerac. Eighteen months ago, in England, she signed a Lasting Power of Attorney — an LPA, the English deed by which a person appoints someone they trust to manage their money and property if they later lose mental capacity — naming you as her attorney. The document is registered with the Office of the Public Guardian in England. It works perfectly with her British bank. Then you fly to France with a certified translation, walk into her French bank to pay her care-home fees, and the adviser shakes her head: “We cannot accept this English document.” A week later the notaire — the French public officer who alone can complete a property sale — tells you the same thing about the Dordogne house you need to sell to fund her care. This article explains why French banks and notaires refuse English LPAs, what French law offers instead, and how you challenge a refusal step by step without losing months or risking personal liability.

Since Brexit, this scene has become routine. While your parent was living in France, French protection law — the set of rules in the Code civil (the French Civil Code) that organises how vulnerable adults are represented — applies to them in France, whatever an English deed says. A French bank that releases funds, or a notaire who completes a sale, on the strength of a foreign power they cannot verify faces professional liability if the consent proves defective. Refusal is therefore rarely hostility and often self-protection. The practical question is what replaces the LPA: the mandat de protection future (a French advance mandate signed before incapacity and activated later), the habilitation familiale (a family authorisation granted by the judge), or a full judicial measure such as sauvegarde de justice (a short-term safeguard), curatelle (assisted decision-making) or tutelle (full representation). Each route has its own judge, its own medical paper and its own delays, and choosing the wrong one costs you half a year. This guide walks through both halves of the problem: first, why the English LPA fails in France and what happens if you ignore the refusal; second, which French route fits your family and how you force a blocked file to move, including the Paris and Ile-de-France specifics many readers need.

I. My English LPA has just been refused by a French bank or notaire — why does French law block it and what is the risk if you do nothing?

A. Why has your English Lasting Power of Attorney just been refused by a French bank or notaire?

An English Lasting Power of Attorney is a creature of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and takes effect in England and Wales once registered with the Office of the Public Guardian, as the official gov.uk guidance on powers of attorney explains. It knows two forms: one for property and financial affairs, one for health and welfare. For a British family it feels universal, and within England it largely is. In France it meets a different legal order. French law protects a vulnerable adult through its own closed list of measures, and the starting point is strict: “Toute personne dans l’impossibilité de pourvoir seule à ses intérêts en raison d’une altération, médicalement constatée, soit de ses facultés mentales, soit de ses facultés corporelles de nature à empêcher l’expression de sa volonté peut bénéficier d’une mesure de protection juridique prévue au présent chapitre.” That sentence is article 425 of the Code civil, and everything French flows from it. Protection in France is not a private deed you buy off the shelf; it is a status the law recognises through defined channels, most of them controlled by a judge, and always anchored to a medically certified alteration of faculties. A bank clerk in Sarlat or a notaire in Paris reads your LPA and sees a foreign private deed, in English, signed under a foreign statute, with no French judicial visa and no French medical certificate attached. Nothing in their training tells them it equals a French measure, because it does not.

The bank’s position is the easiest to understand once you sit in its chair. French banks owe their account holder a duty of vigilance: they must not let a third party empty the account of a person who may lack capacity on the basis of papers they cannot authenticate. An LPA arrives with an English registration stamp, sometimes an apostille — the international authentication attached under the Hague Apostille Convention — and a French translation of variable quality. None of that answers the questions a French compliance officer is trained to ask: has a doctor on the official list certified the alteration of faculties, has the local court endorsed the mandate, and what exactly may the attorney sell, give away or close? Because the English property-and-affairs LPA is deliberately broad, the bank fears the worst case: paying out thousands of euros to someone whose authority a French court would later declare void, then answering to the true owner or the family. So the bank freezes modest day-to-day operations at best and refuses anything structural — closing accounts, redeeming an assurance-vie (a French savings and life-insurance contract with its own succession rules), selling securities — at worst. Readers should know that the bank’s internal legal department, not the branch adviser, takes the real decision, which is why arguing at the counter achieves nothing and a written file addressed to the legal department achieves a great deal, as Part II explains.

The notaire’s refusal follows the same logic with higher stakes. A notaire is not an English solicitor; they are a public officer who gives the deed its authentic force, and they answer personally for the validity of the consent they certify. Selling your mother’s house requires proof that the seller — your mother, acting through you — validly consented. Under French law, acts by a person who lacked capacity can be attacked, and the notaire who instrumented the sale faces a claim. Your LPA, however beautifully translated, does not give the notaire the two anchors French practice demands: a French medical certificate from a doctor on the procureur de la République (public prosecutor) list, and a judicial act — a court order or a court-endorsed mandate — showing that your authority covers a sale of immovable property. The notaire also knows that gifts, sales of the family home and similar grave acts need express judicial authorisation even under French measures, so a foreign deed that purports to authorise everything convinces them of nothing. Add the language gap, the unfamiliar English execution formalities and the post-Brexit background noise — some offices still half-remember European instruments that never applied to powers of attorney — and refusal becomes the safe default. Understanding this mechanism matters because it dictates the remedy: you do not overcome the refusal by shouting louder in English, but by supplying the French anchor the bank and the notaire are waiting for, whether that is an activated French mandate, a family authorisation or a court order, each described below.

One misunderstanding deserves immediate correction. Many families assume that registering the LPA with the Office of the Public Guardian, adding an apostille and paying for a sworn translation turns it into a French-proof instrument. Those steps are useful — a court will want to see them — but they do not create a French protection measure. The sworn translation proves what the deed says; the apostille proves the English stamp is genuine; neither proves that your mother currently lacks capacity in the French medical sense nor that a French judge has entrusted you with her affairs. A second misunderstanding runs the other way: some readers conclude from the refusal that the LPA is worthless and tear it up. Keep it. The LPA remains fully effective in England and Wales for English assets, English banks and English health decisions, and a French judge examining your application will read it as powerful evidence of your mother’s wishes — whom she trusted, before any dispute arose, while she still had full capacity. The task is therefore translation in the deepest sense: carrying the trust your mother expressed in England into the French legal vessel that French institutions recognise, rather than expecting French institutions to board an English vessel they cannot steer.

B. What happens if you insist or do nothing: frozen money, failed sale and personal risk?

The costliest mistake is inertia. While you argue with the branch, your mother’s French current account still receives her French pension and her British State Pension paid into France, but nobody can lawfully move the money toward the nursing-home invoices or the taxe foncière (the French annual property tax on owners). Care homes in the Dordogne, the Lot and the Paris region charge monthly, issue formal demands after two unpaid months and refer files to their recovery departments; a placement can be jeopardised while five-figure sums sit untouched one signature away. Meanwhile the empty house deteriorates, its insurance threatens to lapse — and an uninsured vacant house is a liability no family wants — while the buyer who made an offer in April buys elsewhere in September. One daughter who contacted this firm had paid twelve months of établissement d’hébergement pour personnes âgées dépendantes (EHPAD, a French residential care home for dependent elderly people) fees from her own savings because the bank would not release her father’s funds; by the time the family authorisation arrived, she faced the delicate task of recovering a large intra-family advance from siblings who had not agreed to it. Doing nothing converts a legal problem into a family quarrel, and family quarrels are what French protection litigation feeds on.

Insisting without authority is worse than waiting. If you lean on a junior adviser until a transfer slips through, or if you sign a compromis de vente (the preliminary sale contract) for the house waving the English LPA, you act without a power French law recognises — and the consequences land on you. A buyer who discovers the authority defect can pull out and claim their costs; worse, a sale completed on defective authority can be challenged later by your mother herself if capacity returns, by co-heirs after her death or by a subsequently appointed tuteur (a guardian under full tutelle). French courts take the regularity of protection procedures seriously, as the Court of Cassation showed on 2 March 2022 when it quashed an appeal decision that had upgraded a curatelle without a proper medical-backed application. After stating “Vu les articles 431 et 442, alinéas 3 et 4, du code civil et les articles 1218 et 1228 du code de procédure civile :”, the Court held: “Selon le deuxième de ces textes, si le juge peut, à tout moment, mettre fin à une mesure de protection, la modifier ou lui substituer une autre mesure, il ne peut renforcer le régime de protection que s’il est saisi d’une requête en ce sens, satisfaisant aux conditions fixées par le premier.” It added: “Il résulte de la combinaison des autres que la demande est accompagnée, à peine d’irrecevabilité, d’un certificat circonstancié rédigé par un médecin choisi sur une liste établie par le procureur de la République.” Read the full decision, pourvoi No 20-19.767, on the official Cour de cassation website. The lesson for families is direct: if even a court cannot toughen a measure without the compliant medical certificate described in article 431 of the Code civil — “La demande est accompagnée, à peine d’irrecevabilité, d’un certificat circonstancié rédigé par un médecin choisi sur une liste établie par le procureur de la République.” — then a family member certainly cannot bypass the medical and judicial locks with a foreign deed. Money moved without authority may have to be repaid, and the attorney who moved it can be accused of abus de faiblesse (abuse of a vulnerable person’s weakness, a criminal offence) if the context sours, particularly where siblings disagree about what mother really wanted.

There is a third, quieter risk that British families underestimate: the French tax and benefits machinery keeps running while you are blocked. The annual income-tax return must still be filed and signed for your mother; social charges on rental income continue; the taxe foncière and any impôt sur la fortune immobilière (IFI, the French real-estate wealth tax) fall due whether or not anyone can operate the account. Penalties accrue in your mother’s name, and direct debits fail one by one, each failure generating bank charges that a later application cannot always recover. Health coverage follows the same pattern: without someone lawfully empowered to answer the caisse primaire d’assurance maladie (CPAM, the local health-insurance fund), reimbursements stall and complementary-insurance (mutuelle) premiums lapse. None of this is irreversible if you act within weeks, which is exactly why the refusal letter should be treated as the starting gun for a French protection application rather than as an insult to be appealed emotionally. The sections that follow set out the routes in practical order, from the lightest family solution to full guardianship, so you can match your parent’s situation to the right judge and the right papers at the first attempt instead of learning the scale by rejection.

II. How do you get authority recognised in France and challenge a refusal — which judge, which papers and which remedy?

A. Which French protection route fits your parent: mandat de protection future, habilitation familiale, sauvegarde, curatelle or tutelle?

French law organises protection as a ladder, and the governing principle is subsidiarity: the judge must choose the lightest sufficient measure. The statute states it plainly in article 428 of the Code civil: “La mesure de protection judiciaire ne peut être ordonnée par le juge qu’en cas de nécessité et lorsqu’il ne peut être suffisamment pourvu aux intérêts de la personne par la mise en œuvre du mandat de protection future conclu par l’intéressé, par l’application des règles du droit commun de la représentation, de celles relatives aux droits et devoirs respectifs des époux et des règles des régimes matrimoniaux, en particulier celles prévues aux articles 217 , 219 , 1426 et 1429 ou, par une autre mesure de protection moins contraignante.” A judge who sees that an activated mandate or a family authorisation would suffice must refuse tutelle. For a British family this principle is an ally: it means the court prefers the solution closest to what your mother already chose in England, provided you present it through the correct French channel. Work through the rungs from lightest to heaviest before filing anything.

The closest French cousin of the English LPA is the mandat de protection future, and families who plan ahead should sign one. The Code defines it in article 477 of the Code civil: “Toute personne majeure ou mineure émancipée ne faisant pas l’objet d’une mesure de tutelle ou d’une habilitation familiale peut charger une ou plusieurs personnes, par un même mandat, de la représenter pour le cas où, pour l’une des causes prévues à l’article 425 , elle ne pourrait plus pourvoir seule à ses intérêts.” In practice the mandate is signed before a notaire — the notarised form is strongly recommended for British owners because only the notarised version allows the attorney to sell property — while your parent still has full capacity, and it sleeps until needed. Activation is not automatic: “Le mandat prend effet lorsqu’il est établi que le mandant ne peut plus pourvoir seul à ses intérêts.” That is article 481 of the Code civil, which continues by requiring the attorney to file the mandate plus a medical certificate from a listed doctor with the greffe (the court clerk’s office) of the tribunal judiciaire (the main civil court), whose clerk endorses the mandate and dates its effect. Where protection of the person is included, article 479 of the Code civil adds that “Lorsque le mandat s’étend à la protection de la personne, les droits et obligations du mandataire sont définis par les articles 457-1 à 459-2”. For a British reader the message is concrete: if your mother signed a notarised mandat de protection future years ago when buying the house, you may only need a fresh medical certificate and a trip to the greffe — weeks, not months. If she signed only an English LPA, you cannot convert it into a French mandate after incapacity has arrived; the mandate must predate the loss of capacity, and you must look to the next rung.

That next rung, and the workhorse of Franco-British practice, is the habilitation familiale — the family authorisation. The judge may grant it when the medical condition of article 425 of the Code civil is met: “Lorsqu’une personne est dans l’impossibilité de pourvoir seule à ses intérêts en raison d’une altération, médicalement constatée soit de ses facultés mentales, soit de ses facultés corporelles de nature à empêcher l’expression de sa volonté, le juge des tutelles peut habiliter une ou plusieurs personnes choisies parmi ses ascendants ou descendants, frères et sœurs ou, à moins que la communauté de vie ait cessé entre eux, le conjoint, le partenaire auquel elle est liée par un pacte civil de solidarité ou le concubin à la représenter, à l’assister dans les conditions prévues à l’article 467 ou à passer un ou des actes en son nom dans les conditions et selon les modalités prévues à la présente section et à celles du titre XIII du livre III qui ne lui sont pas contraires, afin d’assurer la sauvegarde de ses intérêts.” That is article 494-1 of the Code civil, and its family circle — children, siblings, spouse, civil partner — covers exactly the people English LPAs usually appoint. The procedure runs before the juge des contentieux de la protection (the specialist protection judge sitting in the tribunal judiciaire), on a standard application with the listed-doctor certificate, and it avoids appointing an outside professional where the family agrees. Its limits matter: the authorised person acts within the mission the judgment defines, and grave dispositions need prior judicial permission. Gifts are the classic trap — a child authorised for general administration cannot simply donate the parent’s money to themselves. The Court of Cassation was asked precisely whether a general family authorisation allows gifts without proof of the protected person’s generous intent, formulating the question as: “« L’absence de caractérisation d’une intention libérale, présente ou passée, de la personne protégée, fait-elle nécessairement obstacle à la possibilité, pour le juge des contentieux de la protection, d’autoriser la personne habilitée à la représenter de manière générale pour l’ensemble des actes relatifs à ses biens, sur le fondement des articles 494-1 et suivants du code civil, à procéder à une donation ? »” — see the opinion of 15 December 2021, No 21-70.022, on the Cour de cassation website. Behind that technical wording sits a warning every British family should hear: French protection is not a blank cheque even when the judge trusts you, because a gift — “La donation entre vifs est un acte par lequel le donateur se dépouille actuellement et irrévocablement de la chose donnée en faveur du donataire qui l’accepte.” under article 894 of the Code civil — requires the protected person’s own generous intent, which a bare administration power cannot supply. So if your plan involves selling the house to pay care fees, say so expressly in the application and ask the judge to include the sale; if it involves gifts to reduce a future succession, expect the judge to refuse or to demand compelling proof.

Above the family authorisation sit the three judicial measures proper, graded by severity. The sauvegarde de justice is a short, flexible safeguard for emergencies — typically a year, renewable once — useful while a fuller application is prepared or while a dubious transaction must be frozen. The curatelle assists a person who can still act but needs continuous support in important acts, while the tutelle represents continuously a person who must be represented in everyday civil acts: “La personne qui, pour l’une des causes prévues à l’article 425, doit être représentée d’une manière continue dans les actes de la vie civile, peut être placée en tutelle.” That is article 440 of the Code civil. Families often ask for tutelle “to be safe,” but judges resist: tutelle strips the adult of nearly all independent action, requires annual accounts, and commonly entrusts management to a professional mandataire judiciaire à la protection des majeurs (a court-registered professional guardian) where relatives disagree. Curatelle, even in its reinforced form, is assistance, not substitution — a distinction the Court of Cassation polices strictly. On 7 February 2024 it held that “alors qu’il résulte des articles 467 et 472 du code civil que le curateur a pour mission d’assister le majeur protégé et que ses pouvoirs de représentation dans la curatelle renforcée sont limités à la perception des revenus, et au paiement des dépenses” See pourvoi No 21-24.864 on the Cour de cassation website. A bank that understands this case law will not let a curateur sell a house alone, and a family that asks for curatelle when only tutelle allows the sale loses months. Practical guidance follows from the ladder: where your parent cannot express any coherent wishes and property must be sold, apply for tutelle or a precisely worded habilitation familiale with sale powers; where they understand with support and only bills need paying, curatelle fits; where relatives fight over every decision, expect the judge to prefer a neutral professional over any child, whatever the English LPA said. The official service-public.fr page on adult protection summarises these measures and the competent court for readers who want the administrative overview before seeing a lawyer.

B. How do you challenge a bank or notaire refusal step by step and get the file moving in Paris and Ile-de-France?

Start by turning the oral “no” into a written refusal you can work with. Return to the branch with a short registered letter — lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception, the recorded-delivery letter that proves receipt — addressed to the legal or succession department, enclosing the LPA with apostille, the sworn French translation, your passport, proof of your mother’s address in France and a recent medical attestation if you hold one. Ask three questions in writing: on which precise legal ground do you refuse to recognise this deed, which French authority would you accept for the transaction I request, and who is the appointed contact for the file? Banks answer written questions from their legal departments far more carefully than verbal ones at the counter, and the reply typically names the missing French anchor — usually the court-endorsed mandate or the protection judgment — which becomes your roadmap. In parallel, ask the notaire for their refusal in writing with the exact powers they consider missing for the planned deed. A notaire who writes that they cannot instrument the sale without a judicial authorisation covering disposal of immovable property has just told you what to ask the judge for. Keep every envelope, every receipt and every email: if the matter later goes to the banking mediator (médiateur bancaire), the Chambre des notaires (the departmental notaries’ disciplinary body) or the court, the paper trail proves diligence and dates the blockage, which matters for recovering charges and for showing urgency.

Next, assemble the medical certificate correctly, because this single paper decides whether your application lives or dies. French procedure does not accept a GP’s note or an English capacity assessment, however eminent the author. The certificate must be circonstancié — detailed and reasoned — written by a doctor on the list drawn up by the procureur de la République, and it must describe the alteration of faculties and its consequences for decision-making, as article 431 of the Code civil demands. Obtain the current list from the tribunal judiciaire of your parent’s residence — for Paris that is the tribunal judiciaire de Paris on the Ile de la Cité, whose protection division handles the capital’s cases; for the inner suburbs it is Nanterre, Bobigny or Créteil, and families in the outer departments go to Versailles, Evry, Meaux or Pontoise depending on domicile. Book the listed doctor early: in Paris and the inner suburbs the wait for an appointment runs two to six weeks, the examination is thorough, and the fee is regulated. Tell the doctor exactly which acts are at stake — paying EHPAD arrears, selling the flat in the 12th arrondissement, closing accounts — so the certificate addresses them. Remember the 2022 Cassation lesson quoted above: a certificate prepared for one purpose, such as activating a future mandate, cannot simply be recycled for another, such as toughening a measure, without risking inadmissibility. One clean, purpose-drafted certificate beats three approximate ones, and filing a defective application to “save time” reliably wastes it, since the judge declares it inadmissible and you rejoin the queue.

With the certificate in hand, file the right application with the right judge and ask for the powers you actually need. The application goes to the juge des contentieux de la protection of the tribunal judiciaire where your parent habitually lives — habitual residence, not nationality, decides jurisdiction, so a British citizen settled in France is fully within French protection jurisdiction. The standard forms distinguish the routes: request for habilitation familiale where united close relatives seek defined powers; request for sauvegarde, curatelle or tutelle where the situation is heavier or relatives disagree. State the English LPA prominently in the file — who was appointed, when, before which capacity — and attach it with translation and apostille, framing it as evidence of your mother’s settled wishes that the judge should honour through the French measure, for instance by appointing you as the authorised person or as tuteur. List the urgent acts expressly: operating named accounts to pay care fees and taxes, selling the identified property at a stated price range, signing the tax return. Judges grant what is asked and reasoned; they rarely invent powers the application forgot. Where siblings oppose you, say so frankly and explain why your appointment still serves your mother’s interests, because the judge will hear them anyway and candour preserves credibility. Timelines vary: an uncontested habilitation familiale in a provincial court can arrive in two to four months, while Paris, Nanterre and Créteil often need longer and contested tutelle files longer still. Ask the judge in the same application for provisional permission to pay current care and tax bills if the wait would cause harm — judges can authorise urgent acts while the main file is examined.

If an institution remains obstructive after the judgment, escalate in the order French practice respects. Against a bank that still refuses despite a clear judgment or an endorsed mandate, write first to the bank’s complaints department, then to the independent banking mediator named in the account agreement, setting out the judgment, the precise refused operation and the mounting charges. Persistent unjustified refusal can be taken to the civil court, which may order release and compensation, and serious cases can be signalled to the supervisory authority. Against a notaire who will not instrument a deed your judgment plainly covers, ask for the written reasons, seek a second opinion from another office — notaires may differ on reading a judgment — and if the blockage persists, refer the matter to the departmental Chambre des notaires and, through your lawyer, to the court for directions. Throughout, keep the English flank in order: notify the Office of the Public Guardian of the French measure where overlap exists, keep English and French attorneys coordinated where different children hold each role, and never use the English LPA to move French assets the French judgment reserves to someone else. Families in Paris and Ile-de-France face one additional practical point: everything runs through larger, busier courts and bigger professional practices, so instruct a lawyer who appears regularly before the protection judge concerned, file complete papers once rather than incomplete papers twice, and diary every deadline the judgment imposes — annual accounts, inventory and prior authorisations — because the capital’s judges enforce them strictly and a sloppy first year poisons later applications to extend or adjust the measure.

Conclusion

A French bank or notaire that rejects your English LPA is not rejecting your mother’s trust in you; it is telling you, in its own cautious language, that England’s vessel cannot sail French waters and that you need a French hull for the same voyage. The refusal letter is therefore the beginning of the file, not its end: have the refusal put in writing, obtain the listed-doctor certificate without delay, and carry your mother’s English choice into the French measure that matches her condition — the endorsed mandat de protection future where one was signed in time, the habilitation familiale where united relatives seek defined powers, or sauvegarde, curatelle or tutelle where the situation demands heavier judicial framing. Ask the judge expressly for the sale, the account operations and the tax signatures you need, because French protection grants what it names and names what it grants. Above all, stop using the English deed alone for French acts the moment refusal arrives: every unauthorised signature deepens the very liability the bank and the notaire feared, while a clean application restores your authority within months and protects the family from quarrels that outlive the crisis. Your mother chose you while she could; French law will still honour that choice — through its own forms, at its own pace, and for as long as you give it papers it recognises.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Telephone consultation: 80 EUR including VAT, with an avocat of the firm within 48 hours. Call 06 46 60 58 22.

Send your documents through our contact page for a first paid analysis. Our Paris office assists British families across Paris and Ile-de-France.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.